DOCSLIB.ORG

Record 2001/7: Regolith–Landform Resources of the Howatharra 1:50

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Record 2001/7: Regolith–Landform Resources of the Howatharra 1:50 RECORD REGOLITH–LANDFORM RESOURCES OF 2001/7 THE HOWATHARRA 1:50 000 SHEET by R. L. Langford GOVERNMENT OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA GEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA DEPARTMENT OF MINERALS AND ENERGY GEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA Record 2001/7 REGOLITH–LANDFORM RESOURCES OF THE HOWATHARRA 1:50 000 SHEET by R. L. Langford Perth 2001 MINISTER FOR STATE DEVELOPMENT; TOURISM; SMALL BUSINESS; GOLDFIELDS–ESPERANCE The Hon. Clive Brown MLA DIRECTOR GENERAL, DEPARTMENT OF MINERALS AND ENERGY L. C. Ranford DIRECTOR, GEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA Tim Griffin REFERENCE The recommended reference for this publication is: LANGFORD, R. L., 2001, Regolith–landform resources of the Howatharra 1:50 000 sheet: Western Australia Geological Survey, Record 2001/7, 61p. National Library of Australia Card Number and ISBN 0 7307 5693 9 Grid references in this publication refer to the Geocentric Datum of Australia 1994 (GDA94). Locations mentioned in the text are referenced using Map Grid of Australia (MGA) coordinates, Zone 50. All locations are quoted to at least the nearest 5 m. Printed by Haymarket Print and Internet Services, Perth, Western Australia Copies available from: Information Centre Department of Minerals and Energy 100 Plain Street EAST PERTH, WESTERN AUSTRALIA 6004 Telephone: (08) 9222 3459 Facsimile: (08) 9222 3444 This and other publications of the Geological Survey of Western Australia are available online through dme.bookshop at www.dme.wa.gov.au Contents Abstract ................................................................................................................................................................ 1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................................................ 1 Location ............................................................................................................................................................... 2 Infrastructure....................................................................................................................................................... 3 Landuse................................................................................................................................................................ 3 Vegetation ........................................................................................................................................................... 4 Climate ................................................................................................................................................................. 4 Previous investigations ...................................................................................................................................... 5 Land systems methodology ............................................................................................................................... 6 Geology and geomorphology .......................................................................................................................... 6 Regolith–landform systems ............................................................................................................................. 10 Northampton System (No) .............................................................................................................................. 11 Moresby System (Mo) ...................................................................................................................................... 17 Casuarina System (Ca) ..................................................................................................................................... 24 Spearwood System (Sp) ................................................................................................................................... 27 Greenough System (Ge) .................................................................................................................................. 31 Greenough Alluvium System (Ga) ................................................................................................................ 35 Quindalup System (Qu) ................................................................................................................................... 38 Marine System (M) ........................................................................................................................................... 45 Mineral resource potential ............................................................................................................................... 48 Overview .................................................................................................................................................... 48 Ferruginous gravel .................................................................................................................................... 48 Sand............................................................................................................................................................. 48 Sand and gravel ......................................................................................................................................... 48 Limestone ................................................................................................................................................... 49 Limesand .................................................................................................................................................... 49 Common clay ............................................................................................................................................. 49 Stone ........................................................................................................................................................... 49 Titanium, zirconium, and garnet ............................................................................................................. 49 Base metals ................................................................................................................................................. 49 Hydrogeology............................................................................................................................................ 51 Acknowledgements .......................................................................................................................................... 51 References ......................................................................................................................................................... 52 Appendices 1. Description of digital datasets ............................................................................................................... 54 2. Gazetteer of localities ............................................................................................................................. 55 3. Slope classification system ..................................................................................................................... 56 4. Grain-size ranges for field classification and particle-size determinations of regolith .................. 56 5. Mineral occurrence definitions ............................................................................................................. 57 6. Classification of rock material strength ................................................................................................ 61 Figures 1. Location of HOWATHARRA in Western Australia ....................................................................................... 2 2. Infrastructure and drainage ..................................................................................................................... 3 3. High-quality agricultural land................................................................................................................. 4 4. Interpreted onshore bedrock geology ................................................................................................... 6 5. Pebbly sandstone and conglomerate of the Cattamarra Coal Measures (Jc) exposed in a road cutting on the Chapman Valley Road ....................................................................................8 6. Hinged bivalve shell pair (Gresslya sanfordii) and other broken shells in ferruginized Newmarracarra Limestone....................................................................................................................... 9 7. Distribution of land systems .................................................................................................................. 10 8. Distribution of the Northampton System (No) .................................................................................... 11 9. Low hills and rises of the Northampton System (No) adjacent to the North West Coastal Highway ................................................................................................................ 11 10. Abundant exposures and exhumed corestones of fresh to moderately weathered granulite of the Northampton Complex ............................................................................................................... 14 iii 11. Stream bed exposures of a north-northeasterly trending fine-grained gabbro dyke cutting pegmatite and semipelitic to pelitic granulite of the Northampton Complex ................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Annual Report 2018-2019 Contents
    ANNUAL REPORT 2018-2019 CONTENTS Mayor’s Foreword .......................................................4 Message from the CEO .............................................7 Wards ..............................................................................8 Councillors ....................................................................9 Meeting Attendance ..............................................10 City Snapshot ............................................................11 Organisation Structure ..........................................13 Achievements 2018/19 ..........................................15 Planning for the Future ..........................................33 Disability Services ....................................................37 Statutory Reports .....................................................38 Financial Summary ..................................................40 Financial Highlights .................................................4242 Community Snapshot .............................................43....4 2 WELCOME Located 424 kilometres north of Perth with a thriving population of over 38,000 - Greater Geraldton has been named one of Australia’s regional capitals. The City and the Mid West Region are recognised as having the most diversifi ed economy in the State through industries including mining, fi shing, aquaculture, agriculture, manufacturing, construction, retail and tourism. As one of Western Australia’s top places to live, work, study or invest, Geraldton is the capital of the Mid West region.
    [Show full text]
  • 2007 Local Government Postal Elections Report
    WESTERN AUSTRALIAN Electoral Commission Local Government Postal Elections Election Report 2007 Foreword In October 2007, the Electoral Commissioner was made responsible for the conduct of 64 postal elections and one voting in person election under the Local Government Act 1995. By making the Electoral Commissioner responsible for these elections, the local governments concerned ensured that the elections were conducted independently and with impartiality. In addition, for those choosing postal voting, local government adopted a method of conducting elections that is more convenient for electors and typically achieves a higher rate of voter participation. Postal elections for local government were first trialled by four local governments in 1995. This increased to eight in 1997, 34 in 1999, 47 in 2001 and 55 in 2003. In 2005, 50 local governments chose the postal voting option, whilst in 2007 this rose to 64. On 20 October 2007, the 64 local governments using the postal voting method consisted of 1,202,481 electors. At the close of nominations on 13 September 2007, 715 candidates had nominated for 375 vacancies resulting in 59 postal elections. A total of 1,054,343 election packages were forwarded. A total of 68 candidates were elected unopposed and two vacancies were unfilled. A total of 94% of all electors in Western Australia had the opportunity to vote in a postal election. Postal elections have clearly become the preferred way that electors choose to participate in local decision-making in Western Australia. The conduct of these elections remains a considerable task for the Commission. A shift in the date of the election from May to October every two years; and the introduction of Preferential and Proportional Representation voting, presented additional challenges to the management of the 2007 program.
    [Show full text]
  • Using Deliberative Democracy for Better Urban Decision-Making Through Integrative Thinking
    Article Using Deliberative Democracy for Better Urban Decision-Making through Integrative Thinking Janette Hartz-Karp and Dora Marinova * Curtin University Sustainability Policy (CUSP) Institute, Curtin University, Perth, WA 6845, Australia; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: This article expands the evidence about integrative thinking by analyzing two case studies that applied the collaborative decision-making method of deliberative democracy which encourages representative, deliberative and influential public participation. The four-year case studies took place in Western Australia, (1) in the capital city Perth and surrounds, and (2) in the city-region of Greater Geraldton. Both aimed at resolving complex and wicked urban sustainability challenges as they arose. The analysis suggests that a new way of thinking, namely integrative thinking, emerged during the deliberations to produce operative outcomes for decision-makers. Building on theory and research demonstrating that deliberative designs lead to improved reasoning about complex issues, the two case studies show that through discourse based on deliberative norms, participants developed different mindsets, remaining open-minded, intuitive and representative of ordinary people’s basic common sense. This spontaneous appearance of integrative thinking enabled sound decision-making about complex and wicked sustainability-related urban issues. In both case studies, the participants exhibited all characteristics of integrative thinking to produce outcomes for decision-makers: salience—grasping the problems’ multiple aspects; causality—identifying multiple sources of impacts; sequencing—keeping the whole in view while focusing on specific aspects; and resolution—discovering novel ways that avoided bad choice trade-offs. Keywords: sustainability; deliberative democracy; mini-publics; integrative thinking; participatory Citation: Hartz-Karp, J.; Marinova, D.
    [Show full text]
  • Greater Geraldton Economic Development Strategy (2013 – 2023)
    GREATER GERALDTON ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY (2013 – 2023) ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND INNOVATION UNIT CITY OF GREATER GERALDTON 63 CATHEDRAL AVE, GERALDTON W A 6 5 3 0 TEL: 08 9956 6600 EMAIL: [email protected] DRAFT GREATER GERALDTON ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY (2013 – 2023) Table of Contents INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................... 2 The Mid West Region ................................................................................................................... 2 The Greater Geraldton Region .................................................................................................... 2 The Economic Development of Greater Geraldton .................................................................. 3 ECONOMIC SNAPSHOTS ........................................................................................................ 5 THE SWOT ANALYSIS ............................................................................................................. 7 THE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK ................................................................... 8 THE VISION .............................................................................................................................. 9 THE OBJECTIVE .....................................................................................................................11 THE TRANSFORMATIONAL CHALLENGES ..........................................................................11
    [Show full text]
  • Chapman Valley Municipal Inventory
    Shire of Chapman Valley Heritage Inventory Lot 7 Chapman Valley Road, Nabawa PO Box 1, Nabawa WA 6532 Phone: (08) 9920 5011 Fax: (08) 9920 5155 Email: [email protected] Website: www.chapmanvalley.wa.gov.au Produced: October 2012 Prepared by Tanya Henkel and Kathryn Jackson for the Shire of Chapman Valley and with the generous support of the State Heritage Office. The Shire would like to extend a big THANK YOU to the Municipal Inventory of Heritage Places Review Steering Committee members: Cr Anne Bell Cr Pauline Forrester Cr Peter Humphrey Delma Attrill Jayne Vlahov Kathryn Jackson Shirley Mincherton Simon Lancaster Tanya Henkel The Shire would also like to say THANKYOU to the following people who submitted additional information and photographs: John Stokes, Chapman Valley Historical Society, Danny Williamson, Terry Williamson, Pam Batten, Lyle Gray, Trevor Cooper and LandCorp. Original Municipal Inventory produced and adopted 1995 Reviewed October 2012 Page 2 CONTENTS INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................................. 6 THEMATIC FRAMEWORK .................................................................................................................. 7 THEMES IN TIME ................................................................................................................................ 7 THEMES THROUGH TIME .......................................................................................................... 26 LEVELS
    [Show full text]
  • Beresford Foreshore Coastal Protection and Enhancement–Master Plan Report Prepared for City of Greater Geraldton
    Beresford Foreshore Coastal Protection and Enhancement–Master Plan Report Prepared for City of Greater Geraldton Cardno (WA) Pty Ltd ABN 77 009 119 000 11 Harvest Terrace West Perth WA 6005 PO Box 447, West Perth Western Australia 6872 Australia Telephone: 08 9273 3888 Facsimile: 08 94868664 International:+61 89273 3888 [email protected] www.cardno.com Document Control Version Date Author Reviewer 1 Dec 2011 Jeff Allott JA Barbara Pedersen BP 2 Jan 2012 Jeff Allott JA Barbara Pederson BP 3 Mar 2012 Jeff Allott JA Barbara Pedersen BP 4 Mar 2012 Jeff Allott JA Barbara Pedersen BP 5 Mar 2012 Jeff Allott JA Barbara Pederson BP 6 Mar 2012 Jeff Allott JA Barbara Pederson BP Filename MASTERPLAN REPORT_Final_28March2012.Docx Author: Jeff Allott Reviewer: Barbara Pedersen Position Title: Manager Landscape Architecture Position Title: Section Leader-Environmental Planning, Environment & Planning Printed on 100% Australian Recycled Paper "© 2012 City of Greater Geraldton All Rights Reserved. Copyright in the whole and every part of this document belongs to City of Greater Geraldton and may not be used, sold, transferred, copied or reproduced in whole or in part in any manner or form or in or on any media to any person without the prior written consent of City of Greater Geraldton.” MASTER PLAN REPORT March 2012 Version: 6 (Final) i Beresford Foreshore Coastal Protection and Enhancement–Master Plan Report Prepared for City of Greater Geraldton Executive Summary Cardno (WA) Pty Ltd were engaged by the City of Geraldton – Greenough to provide professional design consultancy services for the Beresford Coastal Protection Project as outlined in the Councils Request for Tender Document, RFT Number; 27/1011.
    [Show full text]
  • Future Role and Contribution of Regional Capitals to Australia Submission 31
    Senate Inquiry The future role and contribution of regional capitals to Australia 1.0 The City of Greater Geraldton Western Australia Context The City of Greater Geraldton is located 424 km north of Perth at a central point on the west coast boundary of the Mid West region (see Figure 1). The Mid West region covers 478,000 square kilometres, or almost 25% of the state’s land area and encompasses 17 local government authorities (Department of Regional Development, 2014). The region is well endowed with natural resources but sparsely populated. The City of Greater Geraldton is an important functional hub for the region, with all government departments represented. The City of Greater Geraldton is the largest regional centre outside the Perth metropolitan area. Figure 1. Geraldton and the Mid West of Western Australia Source: Government of Western Australia Department of Regional Development http://www.drd.wa.gov.au/regions/Pages/Mid-West.aspx The City of Greater Geraldton covers an area of around 9,890 km2 extending from the west coast to over 150 km inland. Between 2001 and 2011 the overall population of the area now encompassed in the city increased by around 4,000 or approximately 12%. Consistent with a broader regional trend, the two previously distinct administrative areas now incorporated into the recently formed City performed differently. 1 The Mid West is recognised as having a relatively strong and diversified economy. In the relevant period, Gross Regional Product has been the third highest in Western Australia after the Pilbara and Goldfields reflecting the elevated activity in the resources sector (Regional Development Australia, 2013).
    [Show full text]
  • Western Australia 1: 50 000 Regolith–Landform Resources Series
    Northampton 47 km 114°30À 35À 40À 114°45À 56 57 58 59 ä60 6162 63 64 65 66 67 68 69ä70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 ä80 28°45À 10 6590 100 28°45À M´ 10 Boyd Street 17 10 Mµ âc MoC 10 âc MoA¤ GeA¤ Brook Moresby CUTUBURY NATURE Una WESTERN AUSTRALIA 1Ý:Ý50Ý000 REGOLITH_LANDFORM RESOURCES SERIES 10 RESERVE ged to 10 m 6680 dred MoC§ 80 90 NARRATARRA M° 10 D Jc 17 10 CHAMPION M´ MoC§ âc GeA¶ GeA¶ GEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA MoC ROAD 50 70 10 GaA¶ âc Champion Bay 5 10 MoRz SHEET 1840Ý-ݱ±± FIRST EDITION 2000 Outer Knoll SpE CHAPMAN MoA¤ 60 60 16 10 5 GeA¤ 5 10 40 90 6591 5 Beach MOONYOONOOKA SYMBOLS 5 MoC 5 Inner Knoll 5 30 10 BAY SIMPLIFIED LAND SYSTEMS, SHADED RELIEF, 5 MoRf² 5 5 AP 2 Bore SpE 16 INFRASTRUCTURE, AND DRAINAGE 5 ìmNO âc MoRf² 5 Woorree Park Bore 6592 Geological boundary Horizontal control, major...................................................................................... Ge The Geraldton Regolith-Landform Resources map provides information on 35 5 52 5 CITY OF GERALDTON the regolith (soils) and 5 underlying rocks, on the 5 RIVER landforms (landscape), SHIRE OF GREENOUGH 5 WR 1 Bore WT 1 Bore GaA¤ 37 ìmNO exposed........................................................................................................... Sand dune............................................................................................................. Mo 5 5 topography, infrastructure, and on the mineral and construction material 5 M´ 5 M§ WT 2 Bore âc GERALDTON Sp GaA¢ GILES 10 GaA¢ 15 5 Fault or shear Swale line.............................................................................................................. M§ resources of Geraldton. This map will be of value in landuse planning, WR 3 Bore 30 the sustainable development of resources, and in identifying natural 10 WR 2 Bore WO 1 Bore Mµ 6593 GaA¢ âc exposed..........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • City of Geraldton-Greenough's Submission Is Attached
    Submission No. 16 Geraidton-Greenough (Australian SKA Pathfinder Radio Telescope) CMnm'eOi Opporf jrntv OurRef: tb:sjm-133 Enquiries: Tony Brun 4 September 2008 Chairman Parliamentary Standing Committee on Public Works Parliament House CANBERRA ACT 2600 Dear Chairman, SUBMISSION ON THE ASKAP PROJECT Thank you for the opportunity to present a submission to the Inquiry into the Australian SKA Pathfinder Radio Telescope in Geraldton-Greenough and in Murchison Shire, WA. A copy of the City of Geraldton-Greenough's submission is attached. The City is prepared to provide direct evidence or submission if requested. If there are any queries they may be directed to me on (08) 9956 6601. serely, IXECUTIVE OFFICER Cathedral Avenue Geraldton WA 6530 lei 9956 6600. Fax 9956 6674 Cnr Edward / Geraldton / Mt Magnet Road Utakarra WA 6530 Tel 9921 0500 PO Box 101 Geraldton WA 6531 ABM 56641 867 188 General tinail [email protected] www.cgg.wagov.au Page 1 of 1 SUBMISSION BY THE GITY OF GERALDTON-GREENOUGH Parliamentary Standing Committee on Public Works Inquiry into the Australian SKA Pathfinder Radio Telescope in Geraldton-Greenough and in Murchison Shire, WA 1. The City of Geraldton-Greehough understands the following with respect to the Australian Square Kilometre Array Pathfinder (ASKAP) project: a, ASKAP will be a world-class radio telescope in its own right, as weil as being a pathfinder instrument {1% demonstration project) for the full Square Kilometre Array (SKA) project; b. when built ASKAP will be the most powerful radio astronomy instrument in existence. It will consist of multiple dishes, working together as a single instrument; C, Early Pathfinder experiments are expected to start in 2007/08, construction of the Pathfinder telescope will take place from 2009; d.
    [Show full text]
  • City of Greater Geraldton
    !2014069GG! WESTERN 1493 AUSTRALIAN GOVERNMENT ISSN 1448-949X PRINT POST APPROVED PP665002/00041 PERTH, TUESDAY, 13 MAY 2014 No. 69 SPECIAL PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY JOHN A. STRIJK, GOVERNMENT PRINTER AT 1.00 PM © STATE OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA CITY OF GREATER GERALDTON ——————————— LOCAL GOVERNMENT ACT 1995 ANIMALS, ENVIRONMENT AND NUISANCE LOCAL LAW _________ LOCAL GOVERNMENT AND PUBLIC PROPERTY LOCAL LAW 13 May 2014 GOVERNMENT GAZETTE, WA 1495 LOCAL GOVERNMENT ACT 1995 CITY OF GREATER GERALDTON ANIMALS, ENVIRONMENT AND NUISANCE LOCAL LAW 2014 CONTENTS PART 1—PRELIMINARY 1.1 Citation 1.2 Commencement 1.3 Application 1.4 Repeal 1.5 Interpretation PART 2—KEEPING OF ANIMALS Division 1—Keeping of birds 2.1 Keeping of poultry and pigeons in a residential zone 2.2 Conditions for keeping of poultry 2.3 Roosters, geese, turkeys and peafowl 2.4 Conditions for keeping of pigeons 2.5 Conditions of keeping aviary birds 2.6 Nuisance caused by birds Division 2—Keeping of farm animals 2.7 Keeping of farm animals 2.8 Conditions for keeping farm animals PART 3—BUILDING, DEVELOPMENT AND LAND CARE Division 1—Litter and refuse on building sites 3.1 Provision of refuse receptacles 3.2 Control of refuse 3.3 Unauthorised storage of materials Division 2—Prevention of Dust and Liquid Waste 3.4 Prohibited activities Division 3—Smoke 3.5 Burning of cleared vegetation prohibited Division 4—Unsightly land and disused materials 3.6 Storage of vehicles, vessels and machinery 3.7 Disposing of disused refrigerators or similar containers PART 4—NUISANCES AND DANGEROUS THINGS
    [Show full text]
  • Developing Legitimacy for Action by Connecting Citizens and Government
    Developing Legitimacy for Action by Connecting Citizens and Government: Lessons for U.S. Local Government Leaders from a Citizen Engagement Process in Australia William R. Barnes, Ph.D. Visiting Scholar, Institute of Public Policy The George Washington University June 2016 This report was funded by the Local Government Research Collaborative. About the Local Government Research Collaborative: In early 2013, 21 local governments and three universities joined together with the Alliance for Innovation, the International City/County Management Association, and the Center for Urban Innovation at Arizona State University to establish the Local Government Research Collaborative (LGRC). The LGRC is developing and funding an actionable research agenda that addresses significant issues confronting local governments. For more information on the LGRC email Toni Shope, Strategic Initiatives Director with the Alliance for Innovation at [email protected] Members funding this report include: Alliance for Innovation Grande Prairie, Alberta Arizona State University ICMA Arvada, Colorado Kansas University Auburn, Alabama Milton, Georgia Austin, Texas Navajo County, Arizona Catawba County, North Carolina Oak Ridge, Tennessee Clearwater, Florida Olathe, Kansas Decatur, Georgia Phoenix, Arizona Dubuque, Iowa Sacramento, California Edmonton, Alberta Sarasota County, Florida Evanston, Illinois Stafford County, Virginia Flagstaff, Arizona University of North Carolina - Chapel Hill Fort Lauderdale, Florida University of Colorado - Denver About the Authors William R. Barnes, Ph.D.1 is a Visiting Scholar at the George Washington University Institute of Public Policy. He retired after a career in policy analysis, research, and senior management at the National League of Cities in Washington DC. He is a Fellow of the National Academy of Public Administration.
    [Show full text]
  • City of Greater Geraldton Local Planning Strategy
    City of Greater Geraldton Local Planning Strategy “from a local to global regional city” December 2014 DRAFT FOR PUBLIC COMMENT Page ii ADVERTISING The City of Greater Geraldton Local Planning Strategy certified for advertising on …………………………. _____________________________________________________ an officer of the Commission duly authorised by the Commission (pursuant to the Planning and Development Act 2005) Date: __________________________________ ADOPTED Adopted by resolution of the Council of the City of Greater Geraldton at the Ordinary Meeting of the Council held on the ………………………. day of …………………… 20.… …………………………………… Mayor …………………………………… Chief Executive Officer ENDORSEMENT Endorsed by the Western Australian Planning Commission on the ………………………. day of …………………… 20.… _____________________________________________________ an officer of the Commission duly authorised by the Commission (pursuant to the Planning and Development Act 2005) Date: __________________________________ Page iii PREAMBLE Geraldton is at the start of a substantial economic growth process driven by mining, trade and science that will draw the Geraldton region into the global economy. The 2029 and Beyond project is a community-based planning process initiated by the City of Greater Geraldton and its partners in 2010, to address the challenges and opportunities facing our City and region and responds to requests in the community for citizens to be more actively involved in planning for their future. This Local Planning Strategy draws extensively on (and is a key deliverable of) the 2029 and Beyond project and will assist the transformation of Geraldton – from a local to global regional city. The local planning strategy (the Strategy) is a statutory requirement under the Planning and Development Act 2005 and forms the strategic basis for the preparation of a local planning scheme for the City.
    [Show full text]