Annual Report 2018-2019 Contents
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Centre for Regional Development
CENTRE FOR REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT April 29th Senate Standing Committee on Rural and Regional Affairs and Transport, PO Box 6100, Parliament House, Canberra ACT 2600. To whom it may concern, Please find attached our submission to the Senate Inquiry regarding The future role and contribution of regional capitals to Australia. Our submission is based on extensive work and research conducted in rural, regional and remote communities of Western Australia over the last three decades. The Centre for Regional Development at the University of Western Australia is research intensive, focussing on understanding the major economic, social and environmental opportunities and challenges facing rural, regional and remote Australia. It was established in 1999 and has since undertaken research for, and disseminated scholarly and applied academic information to, a range of national and government agencies, private sector and community organisations and natural resource management groups. Our submission drawers upon intensive socio-economic assessment of the largest and/or most strategically located regional towns in Western Australia: Port Hedland, Karratha, Geraldton, Bunbury, Kalgoorlie-Boulder and Albany. 1 CENTRE FOR REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT Should you have any additional questions that you think we may be able to assist with, please do not hesitate to contact us. Yours sincerely, on behalf of Professor Fiona Haslam McKenzie Co-director Centre for Regional Development Professor Paul Plummer Co-director Centre for Regional Development Professor Matthew Tonts Head, School of Earth and Environment 2 CENTRE FOR REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT Senate Inquiry The future role and contribution of regional capitals to Australia This submission draws on research undertaken for seven of the largest regional centres in Western Australia, referred herein as the Western Australian Regional Capitals. -
2007 Local Government Postal Elections Report
WESTERN AUSTRALIAN Electoral Commission Local Government Postal Elections Election Report 2007 Foreword In October 2007, the Electoral Commissioner was made responsible for the conduct of 64 postal elections and one voting in person election under the Local Government Act 1995. By making the Electoral Commissioner responsible for these elections, the local governments concerned ensured that the elections were conducted independently and with impartiality. In addition, for those choosing postal voting, local government adopted a method of conducting elections that is more convenient for electors and typically achieves a higher rate of voter participation. Postal elections for local government were first trialled by four local governments in 1995. This increased to eight in 1997, 34 in 1999, 47 in 2001 and 55 in 2003. In 2005, 50 local governments chose the postal voting option, whilst in 2007 this rose to 64. On 20 October 2007, the 64 local governments using the postal voting method consisted of 1,202,481 electors. At the close of nominations on 13 September 2007, 715 candidates had nominated for 375 vacancies resulting in 59 postal elections. A total of 1,054,343 election packages were forwarded. A total of 68 candidates were elected unopposed and two vacancies were unfilled. A total of 94% of all electors in Western Australia had the opportunity to vote in a postal election. Postal elections have clearly become the preferred way that electors choose to participate in local decision-making in Western Australia. The conduct of these elections remains a considerable task for the Commission. A shift in the date of the election from May to October every two years; and the introduction of Preferential and Proportional Representation voting, presented additional challenges to the management of the 2007 program. -
AGENDA for the ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING to BE HELD on Wednesday 20 July 2016
AGENDA FOR THE ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING TO BE HELD ON Wednesday 20 July 2016 SHIRE OF MINGENEW 1 of 249 AGENDA FOR THE ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING TO BE HELD ON Wednesday 20 July 2016 SHIRE OF MINGENEW MINGENEW SHIRE COUNCIL ORDINARY MEETING AGENDA – 20 July 2016 Shire of Mingenew Ordinary Council Meeting Notice Paper 15 July 2016 Madam President and Councillors, An ordinary meeting of Council is called for Wednesday, 20 July 2016, in the Council Chambers, Victoria Street, Mingenew, commencing at 4.30 pm. Martin Whitely Chief Executive Officer 15 July 2016 MINGENEW SHIRE COUNCIL ORDINARY MEETING AGENDA – 20 July 2016 MINGENEW SHIRE COUNCIL ORDINARY MEETING AGENDA – 20 July 2016 MINGENEW SHIRE COUNCIL DISCLAIMER No responsibility whatsoever is implied or accepted by the Mingenew Shire Council for any act, omission or statement or intimation occurring during Council/Committee meetings or during formal/informal conversations with staff. The Mingenew Shire Council disclaims any liability for any loss whatsoever and howsoever caused arising out of reliance by any person or legal entity on any such act, omission or statement occurring during Council/Committee meetings or discussions. Any person or legal entity that acts or fails to act in reliance upon any statement does so at that person’s or legal entity’s own risk. In particular and without derogating in any way from the broad disclaimer above, in any discussion regarding any planning application or application for a licence, any statement or limitation of approval made by a member or officer of Mingenew Shire Council during the course of any meeting is not intended to be and is not taken as notice of approval from the Mingenew Shire Council. -
Agenda for the Ordinary Meeting of the Murchison Shire Council
Agenda for the Ordinary Meeting of the Murchison Shire Council, To be held in the Council Chambers, Carnarvon Mullewa Road, Murchison, On Friday 24 September 2010, commencing at 10.00 am. Ordinary Council Meeting Agenda – April 2010 - Page 2 - TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. DECLARATION OF OPENING/ANNOUNCEMENT OF VISITORS ................................ 3 2. RECORD OF ATTENDANCE/APOLOGIES/LEAVE OF ABSENCE ............................... 3 3. RESPONSE TO PREVIOUS PUBLIC QUESTIONS TAKEN ON NOTICE ..................... 3 4. PUBLIC QUESTION TIME ............................................................................................... 3 5. NEXT MEETING............................................................................................................... 3 6. APPLICATIONS FOR LEAVE OF ABSENCE .................................................................. 3 7. NOTICE OF ITEMS TO BE DISCUSSED BEHIND CLOSED DOORS ........................... 3 8. CONFIRMATION OF FLYING MINUTES ........................................................................ 4 9. CONFIRMATION OF MINUTES ...................................................................................... 4 9.1 ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING –20 August 2010 ....................................................... 4 10. ANNOUNCEMENTS BY PRESIDING PERSON WITHOUT DISCUSSION .................... 5 11. PETITIONS/DEPUTATIONS/PRESENTATIONS/SUBMISSIONS .................................. 5 12. ANNOUNCEMENTS CONCERNING MEETINGS ATTENDED ...................................... 6 12.1 PRESIDENT .................................................................................................................... -
Using Deliberative Democracy for Better Urban Decision-Making Through Integrative Thinking
Article Using Deliberative Democracy for Better Urban Decision-Making through Integrative Thinking Janette Hartz-Karp and Dora Marinova * Curtin University Sustainability Policy (CUSP) Institute, Curtin University, Perth, WA 6845, Australia; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: This article expands the evidence about integrative thinking by analyzing two case studies that applied the collaborative decision-making method of deliberative democracy which encourages representative, deliberative and influential public participation. The four-year case studies took place in Western Australia, (1) in the capital city Perth and surrounds, and (2) in the city-region of Greater Geraldton. Both aimed at resolving complex and wicked urban sustainability challenges as they arose. The analysis suggests that a new way of thinking, namely integrative thinking, emerged during the deliberations to produce operative outcomes for decision-makers. Building on theory and research demonstrating that deliberative designs lead to improved reasoning about complex issues, the two case studies show that through discourse based on deliberative norms, participants developed different mindsets, remaining open-minded, intuitive and representative of ordinary people’s basic common sense. This spontaneous appearance of integrative thinking enabled sound decision-making about complex and wicked sustainability-related urban issues. In both case studies, the participants exhibited all characteristics of integrative thinking to produce outcomes for decision-makers: salience—grasping the problems’ multiple aspects; causality—identifying multiple sources of impacts; sequencing—keeping the whole in view while focusing on specific aspects; and resolution—discovering novel ways that avoided bad choice trade-offs. Keywords: sustainability; deliberative democracy; mini-publics; integrative thinking; participatory Citation: Hartz-Karp, J.; Marinova, D. -
Greater Geraldton Economic Development Strategy (2013 – 2023)
GREATER GERALDTON ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY (2013 – 2023) ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND INNOVATION UNIT CITY OF GREATER GERALDTON 63 CATHEDRAL AVE, GERALDTON W A 6 5 3 0 TEL: 08 9956 6600 EMAIL: [email protected] DRAFT GREATER GERALDTON ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY (2013 – 2023) Table of Contents INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................... 2 The Mid West Region ................................................................................................................... 2 The Greater Geraldton Region .................................................................................................... 2 The Economic Development of Greater Geraldton .................................................................. 3 ECONOMIC SNAPSHOTS ........................................................................................................ 5 THE SWOT ANALYSIS ............................................................................................................. 7 THE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK ................................................................... 8 THE VISION .............................................................................................................................. 9 THE OBJECTIVE .....................................................................................................................11 THE TRANSFORMATIONAL CHALLENGES ..........................................................................11 -
Chapman Valley Municipal Inventory
Shire of Chapman Valley Heritage Inventory Lot 7 Chapman Valley Road, Nabawa PO Box 1, Nabawa WA 6532 Phone: (08) 9920 5011 Fax: (08) 9920 5155 Email: [email protected] Website: www.chapmanvalley.wa.gov.au Produced: October 2012 Prepared by Tanya Henkel and Kathryn Jackson for the Shire of Chapman Valley and with the generous support of the State Heritage Office. The Shire would like to extend a big THANK YOU to the Municipal Inventory of Heritage Places Review Steering Committee members: Cr Anne Bell Cr Pauline Forrester Cr Peter Humphrey Delma Attrill Jayne Vlahov Kathryn Jackson Shirley Mincherton Simon Lancaster Tanya Henkel The Shire would also like to say THANKYOU to the following people who submitted additional information and photographs: John Stokes, Chapman Valley Historical Society, Danny Williamson, Terry Williamson, Pam Batten, Lyle Gray, Trevor Cooper and LandCorp. Original Municipal Inventory produced and adopted 1995 Reviewed October 2012 Page 2 CONTENTS INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................................. 6 THEMATIC FRAMEWORK .................................................................................................................. 7 THEMES IN TIME ................................................................................................................................ 7 THEMES THROUGH TIME .......................................................................................................... 26 LEVELS -
Wildflower A4 Document [STYLE GUIDE]
FIVE YEAR DEVELOPMENT PLAN 2012 - 2017 A plan to guide the direction of Wildflower Country tourism CONTENTS 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...............................................................................................4 STRATEGIC PLAN INTENT ................................................................................................... 5 METHODOLOGY & PROJECT BACKGROUND .................................................................................................. 6 STRATEGIC DIRECTIONS ................................................................................................................................... 6 2.0 OUR VISION ................................................................................................................8 3.0 TOURISM IN WILDFLOWER COUNTRY ........................................................................9 3.1 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................................... 10 3.2 TOURISM ASSETS .................................................................................................................................. 10 3.3 TRANSPORT .......................................................................................................................................... 12 3.4 MANAGEMENT OF TOURISM ................................................................................................................ 13 3.4 STAKEHOLDERS .................................................................................................................................... -
Beresford Foreshore Coastal Protection and Enhancement–Master Plan Report Prepared for City of Greater Geraldton
Beresford Foreshore Coastal Protection and Enhancement–Master Plan Report Prepared for City of Greater Geraldton Cardno (WA) Pty Ltd ABN 77 009 119 000 11 Harvest Terrace West Perth WA 6005 PO Box 447, West Perth Western Australia 6872 Australia Telephone: 08 9273 3888 Facsimile: 08 94868664 International:+61 89273 3888 [email protected] www.cardno.com Document Control Version Date Author Reviewer 1 Dec 2011 Jeff Allott JA Barbara Pedersen BP 2 Jan 2012 Jeff Allott JA Barbara Pederson BP 3 Mar 2012 Jeff Allott JA Barbara Pedersen BP 4 Mar 2012 Jeff Allott JA Barbara Pedersen BP 5 Mar 2012 Jeff Allott JA Barbara Pederson BP 6 Mar 2012 Jeff Allott JA Barbara Pederson BP Filename MASTERPLAN REPORT_Final_28March2012.Docx Author: Jeff Allott Reviewer: Barbara Pedersen Position Title: Manager Landscape Architecture Position Title: Section Leader-Environmental Planning, Environment & Planning Printed on 100% Australian Recycled Paper "© 2012 City of Greater Geraldton All Rights Reserved. Copyright in the whole and every part of this document belongs to City of Greater Geraldton and may not be used, sold, transferred, copied or reproduced in whole or in part in any manner or form or in or on any media to any person without the prior written consent of City of Greater Geraldton.” MASTER PLAN REPORT March 2012 Version: 6 (Final) i Beresford Foreshore Coastal Protection and Enhancement–Master Plan Report Prepared for City of Greater Geraldton Executive Summary Cardno (WA) Pty Ltd were engaged by the City of Geraldton – Greenough to provide professional design consultancy services for the Beresford Coastal Protection Project as outlined in the Councils Request for Tender Document, RFT Number; 27/1011. -
Identification of High Quality Agricultural Land in the Mid West Region: Stage 1 – Geraldton Planning Region Second Edition Resource Management Technical Report 386
Department of Agriculture and Food Identification of high quality agricultural land in the Mid West region: Stage 1 – Geraldton Planning Region Second edition Resource management technical report 386 Supporting your success Identification of high quality agricultural land in the Mid West region: Stage 1 – Geraldton planning region Second edition, replaces Resource management technical report 384 Resource management technical report 386 Peter Tille, Angela Stuart-Street and Dennis van Gool Copyright © Western Australian Agriculture Authority, 2013 April 2013 ISSN 1039–7205 Cover photo: Young wheat crop growing on the rich alluvial soils of the Greenough flats. (Photo: A. Stuart-Street,) Disclaimer While all reasonable care has been taken in the preparation of the information in this document, the Chief Executive Officer of the Department of Agriculture and Food and its officers and the State of Western Australia accept no responsibility for any errors or omissions it may contain, whether caused by negligence or otherwise, or for any loss, however caused, arising from reliance on, or the use or release of, this information or any part of it. Copies of this document are available in alternative formats upon request. 3 Baron-Hay Court, South Perth WA 6151 Tel: (08) 9368 3333 Email: [email protected] agric.wa.gov.au Identification of high quality agricultural land in the Geraldton planning region Contents Acknowledgments ........................................................................................................... v Executive -
Future Role and Contribution of Regional Capitals to Australia Submission 31
Senate Inquiry The future role and contribution of regional capitals to Australia 1.0 The City of Greater Geraldton Western Australia Context The City of Greater Geraldton is located 424 km north of Perth at a central point on the west coast boundary of the Mid West region (see Figure 1). The Mid West region covers 478,000 square kilometres, or almost 25% of the state’s land area and encompasses 17 local government authorities (Department of Regional Development, 2014). The region is well endowed with natural resources but sparsely populated. The City of Greater Geraldton is an important functional hub for the region, with all government departments represented. The City of Greater Geraldton is the largest regional centre outside the Perth metropolitan area. Figure 1. Geraldton and the Mid West of Western Australia Source: Government of Western Australia Department of Regional Development http://www.drd.wa.gov.au/regions/Pages/Mid-West.aspx The City of Greater Geraldton covers an area of around 9,890 km2 extending from the west coast to over 150 km inland. Between 2001 and 2011 the overall population of the area now encompassed in the city increased by around 4,000 or approximately 12%. Consistent with a broader regional trend, the two previously distinct administrative areas now incorporated into the recently formed City performed differently. 1 The Mid West is recognised as having a relatively strong and diversified economy. In the relevant period, Gross Regional Product has been the third highest in Western Australia after the Pilbara and Goldfields reflecting the elevated activity in the resources sector (Regional Development Australia, 2013). -
A. Batavia Regional Organisation of Councils
A. BATAVIA REGIONAL ORGANISATION OF COUNCILS This Group is self governing. Purpose: The purpose of the committee is to address potential area of resource sharing whether it be through employers, equipment and general services. Members appointed to represent the City of Geraldton-Greenough: External members Cr J Collingwood – President Shire of Chapman Valley Cr P Batten Shire of Chapman Valley Mr D Sellenger Shire of Chapman Valley Cr S Chandler President Shire of Irwin To be advised Shire of Irwin Mr Brian Jones CEO Shire of Irwin Cr G Wilson President Shire of Northampton Cr L Parker Shire of Northampton Mr G Keeffe CEO Shire of Northampton City of Geraldton-Greenough - support staff Chief Executive Officer External Group’s Contact Details N/A - Jointly managed (in rotation) by the Mayor/President and CEO of each member Council: City of Geraldton-Greenough, Shire of Chapman Valley, Shire of Irwin and Shire of Northampton, on a yearly basis. Current Host for 2010 Mayor, Ian Carpenter City of Geraldton-Greenough Term of Office: Expires 15 October 2011 or as determined by Council. Terms of Reference 1. SET the Terms of Reference of the Batavia Regional Organisation of Councils to be: a. development of BROC Regional Paper prior to State and Federal Elections; b. resource Sharing opportunities; c. Town Planning Scheme consistency; d. waste management Initiatives; and e. development and implementation of a Memorandum of Understanding between BROC and the State Government. Delegation: As requested by the Chief Executive Officer. Meeting Details (if known) Meetings held approximately 3 monthly and held at the Host’s venue.