DOCSLIB.ORG

City of Geraldton-Greenough

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
City of Geraldton-Greenough CITY OF GERALDTON-GREENOUGH LOCAL PLANNING STRATEGY GREENOUGH (OCTOBER 2008) Endorsed by the Western Australian Planning Commission 9 September 2008 DISCLAIMER This is a copy of the Local Planning Strategy at the date of endorsement produced from an electronic version of the Strategy held by the Department for Planning and Infrastructure. Whilst all care has been taken to accurately portray the current Strategy provisions, no responsibility shall be taken for any omissions or errors in this documentation. Consultation with the respective Local Government Authority should be made to view a current legal version of the Strategy. Please advise the Department for Planning and Infrastructure of any errors or omissions in this document PREPARED BY THE CITY OF GERALDTON-GREENOUGH With the assistance of O’Brien Planning Consultants Landform Research and Cad Directions Australia CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION.........................................................................................................................4 1.1 Background .................................................................................................................................4 1.2 Model Scheme Text ....................................................................................................................4 1.3 Scheme Review Objectives ........................................................................................................4 1.4 Scheme Area ..............................................................................................................................5 2 PLANNING CONTEXT ...............................................................................................................7 2.1 Introduction .................................................................................................................................7 2.2 State Planning Strategy ..............................................................................................................7 2.3 Geraldton Region Plan 1999.......................................................................................................8 2.3.1 Introduction ....................................................................................................................8 2.3.2 Regional Development...................................................................................................8 2.3.3 Community Development Objective...............................................................................9 2.3.4 Environmental Objective ............................................................................................. 10 2.3.5 Economic Objective .................................................................................................... 10 2.3.6 Infrastructure Objective............................................................................................... 10 2.3.7 The Land Use Strategy ............................................................................................... 10 2.4 The Greater Geraldton Structure Plan..................................................................................... 11 2.4.1 Population ................................................................................................................... 11 2.4.2 Residential Areas........................................................................................................ 11 2.4.3 Commercial Development........................................................................................... 13 2.4.4 Community Services ................................................................................................... 13 2.4.5 Rural-Residential Areas .............................................................................................. 13 2.4.6 Rural Areas ................................................................................................................. 13 2.4.7 Recreation, Landscape and Conservation Areas ....................................................... 13 2.4.8 Industrial Areas ........................................................................................................... 14 2.4.9 Transport..................................................................................................................... 14 2.4.10 Infrastructure............................................................................................................... 15 2.5 AGRICULTURAL AND RURAL LAND USE PLANNING POLICY........................................... 15 2.6 RURAL STRATEGY 1993 ....................................................................................................... 16 2.7 AQUACULTURE SITES ASSESSMENT................................................................................. 16 2.8 HERITAGE INVENTORY......................................................................................................... 16 2.9 MIDWEST TOURISM STRATEGY .......................................................................................... 17 2.10 GERALDTON-GREENOUGH RETAIL AND SERVICES STRATEGY.................................... 17 2.11 GERALDTON REGIONAL ACCOMMODATION STUDY........................................................ 18 2.12 BATAVIA COAST STRATEGY ................................................................................................ 18 2.13 DRAFT MORESBY RANGE MANAGEMENT STRATEGY..................................................... 19 2.14 CHAPMAN RIVER REGIONAL PARK MANAGEMENT PLAN ............................................... 19 3 KEY ISSUES............................................................................................................................ 20 3.1 COMMUNITY ISSUES............................................................................................................. 20 3.1.1 Introduction ................................................................................................................. 20 3.1.2 North Ward.................................................................................................................. 20 3.1.3 South Ward ................................................................................................................. 21 3.1.4 Tarcoola Ward............................................................................................................. 23 3.1.5 West Ward .................................................................................................................. 23 3.1.6 Individual Community Comments ............................................................................... 25 3.1.7 Walkaway.................................................................................................................... 25 3.1.8 Waggrakine ................................................................................................................. 26 3.2 LAND USE ISSUES................................................................................................................. 27 3.2.1 Introduction ................................................................................................................. 27 3.2.2 Heritage....................................................................................................................... 27 3.2.3 Rural Areas ................................................................................................................. 28 3.2.4 SettlementAreas Introduction...................................................................................... 30 3.2.5 Population ................................................................................................................... 35 3.2.6 Economic Development .............................................................................................. 37 3.2.7 Infrastructure............................................................................................................... 40 3.2.8 Conservation............................................................................................................... 44 4 PLANNING DIRECTIONS ....................................................................................................... 45 4.1 Introduction .............................................................................................................................. 45 4.2 Major Developments ................................................................................................................ 45 4.2.1 Introduction ................................................................................................................. 45 4.2.2 Oakajee Industrial Estate............................................................................................ 45 4.3 Projected Population and Land Requirements ........................................................................ 47 4.4 Urban Development ................................................................................................................. 47 4.4.1 Land Supply ................................................................................................................ 47 4.4.2 Land Release Plan...................................................................................................... 47 4.4.3 Dwelling Stock and Vacant Lots ................................................................................. 47 4.4.4 Vacant Urban Zoned Land.......................................................................................... 48 4.4.5 Vacant Commercial and Industrial
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Member for Wakefield South Australia
    Conference delegates 2016 *Asterisks identify the recipients of the 2016 Crawford Fund Conference Scholarships ACHITEI, Simona Scope Global ALDERS, Robyn The University of Sydney ANDERSON AO, John The Crawford Fund NSW ANDREW AO, Neil Murray-Darling Basin Authority ANGUS, John CSIRO Agriculture *ARIF, Shumaila Charles Sturt University ARMSTRONG, Tristan Australian Government Department of Foreign Affairs & Trade ASH, Gavin University of Southern Queensland ASTORGA, Miriam Western Sydney University AUGUSTIN, Mary Ann CSIRO *BAHAR, Nur The Australian National University BAILLIE, Craig The National Centre for Engineering in Agriculture (NCEA), University of Southern Queensland *BAJWA, Ali School of Agriculture & Food Sciences, The University of Queensland BARLASS, Martin Plant Biosecurity Cooperative Research Centre BASFORD, Kaye The Crawford Fund *BEER, Sally University of New England, NSW *BENYAM, Addisalem Central Queensland University BERRY, Sarah James Cook University / CSIRO *BEST, Talitha Central Queensland University BIE, Elizabeth Australian Government Department of Agriculture & Water Resources BISHOP, Joshua WWF-Australia BLACKALl, Patrick The University of Queensland *BLAKE, Sara South Australian Research & Development Institute (SARDI), Primary Industries & Regions South Australia BLIGHT AO, Denis The Crawford Fund *BONIS-PROFUMO, Gianna Charles Darwin University BOREVITZ, Justin The Australian National University BOYD, David The University of Sydney BRASSIL, Semih Western Sydney University BROGAN, Abigail Australian Centre
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2018-2019 Contents
    ANNUAL REPORT 2018-2019 CONTENTS Mayor’s Foreword .......................................................4 Message from the CEO .............................................7 Wards ..............................................................................8 Councillors ....................................................................9 Meeting Attendance ..............................................10 City Snapshot ............................................................11 Organisation Structure ..........................................13 Achievements 2018/19 ..........................................15 Planning for the Future ..........................................33 Disability Services ....................................................37 Statutory Reports .....................................................38 Financial Summary ..................................................40 Financial Highlights .................................................4242 Community Snapshot .............................................43....4 2 WELCOME Located 424 kilometres north of Perth with a thriving population of over 38,000 - Greater Geraldton has been named one of Australia’s regional capitals. The City and the Mid West Region are recognised as having the most diversifi ed economy in the State through industries including mining, fi shing, aquaculture, agriculture, manufacturing, construction, retail and tourism. As one of Western Australia’s top places to live, work, study or invest, Geraldton is the capital of the Mid West region.
    [Show full text]
  • Geraldton Marine Electronics Productivity Ensures Our Produce and Resources Are Highly Sought After
    GERALDTON MARITIME SERVICES NETWORK Geraldton lies at the heart of a region Mid West Ports Authority with a diverse economy and many City of Greater Geraldton opportunities for agriculture, aquaculture, Mid West Chamber of Commerce mining, tourism, manufacturing and and Industry infrastructure opportunities. Centrally located between Perth and Broome, in Fine Entry Marine Western Australia, Geraldton sits outside Fleet Hydraulics and Fleet the cyclone zone of the North West. Supplies & Services Geraldton and it industries have the GHS Solutions potential to be a home for projects that build on existing strengths, as well as Geraldton Marine Diesel new and innovative enterprises. Mark Millman Marine Batavia Coast Maritime Institute With strong infrastructure and linkages to the Asia Pacific region, our clean Xtreme Marine and green reputation for efficiency and Geraldton Marine Electronics productivity ensures our produce and resources are highly sought after. Greater Geraldton contains a range of engineering and manufacturing enterprises involved in marine infrastructure production, prefabricated metal products and sheet metal products for a variety of export and domestic construction customers. Businesses engaged in marine services can access high quality infrastructure at the fishing boat harbour, including 50- and 200-tonne boat lifting and hard-stand facilities. Geraldton What’s more, all businesses benefit from the city’s skilled, specialised workforce, low input costs and proximity to industrial sites and communities to develop high margin niche markets. Geraldton’s maritime industry has demonstrated that it has the potential to be a world leader. Comprising of large and small companies, the maritime industry makes a great contribution to this region’s economy and unique lifestyle.
    [Show full text]
  • Geology of the Northern Perth Basin, Western Australia
    See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/233726107 Geology of the northern Perth Basin, Western Australia. A field guide Technical Report · June 2005 CITATIONS READS 15 1,069 4 authors: Arthur John Mory David Haig Government of Western Australia University of Western Australia 91 PUBLICATIONS 743 CITATIONS 61 PUBLICATIONS 907 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE Stephen Mcloughlin Roger M. Hocking Swedish Museum of Natural History Geological Survey of Western Australia 143 PUBLICATIONS 3,298 CITATIONS 54 PUBLICATIONS 375 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects: Lower Permian bryozoans of Western Australia View project Late Palaeozoic palynology of Dronning Maud Land, Antarctica View project All content following this page was uploaded by Stephen Mcloughlin on 05 May 2017. The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file. All in-text references underlined in blue are added to the original document and are linked to publications on ResearchGate, letting you access and read them immediately. Department of Industry and Resources RECORD GEOLOGY OF THE NORTHERN PERTH 2005/9 BASIN, WESTERN AUSTRALIA — A FIELD GUIDE by A. J. Mory, D. W. Haig, S. McLoughlin, and R. M. Hocking Geological Survey of Western Australia GEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA Record 2005/9 GEOLOGY OF THE NORTHERN PERTH BASIN, WESTERN AUSTRALIA — A FIELD GUIDE by A. J. Mory, D. W. Haig1, S. McLoughlin2, and R. M. Hocking 1 School of Earth and Geographical Sciences, The University of Western Australia 2 School of Natural Resource Sciences, Queensland University of Technology Perth 2005 MINISTER FOR STATE DEVELOPMENT Hon.
    [Show full text]
  • Main Roads Western Australia Report for Geraldton to Mt Magnet Road at 40.96 to 41.8 SLK Preliminary Environmental Impact Assessment
    Main Roads Western Australia Report for Geraldton to Mt Magnet Road at 40.96 to 41.8 SLK Preliminary Environmental Impact Assessment January 2007 FINAL DRAFT Contents 1. Introduction and Project Description 1 1.1 Introduction 1 1.2 Project Description 1 2. Environmental Aspects 3 2.1 Surrounding Area Land Use and Tenure 3 2.2 Reserves and Conservation Areas 3 2.3 Wetlands / Surface Waters & Drainage 3 2.4 Groundwater 3 2.5 Salinity 4 2.6 Acid Sulphate Soils 4 2.7 Vegetation 4 2.8 Fauna 9 2.9 Contaminated Sites 10 2.10 Aboriginal Heritage 10 2.11 European Heritage 10 2.12 Air Quality 10 2.13 Noise and Vibration 11 2.14 Visual Amenity 11 2.15 Public Safety and Risk 11 3. Conclusions and Recommendations 12 3.1 Aspects Not Considered Relevant 12 3.2 Recommendations 12 4. References 14 Table Index Table 1 Environmental and Social Aspects Considered 2 Table 2 Regional Assessment of Vegetation Extent 5 Table 3 Threatened and Priority Flora 5 Table 4 Threatened Fauna 9 61/18768/12276 Geraldton to Mt Magnet Road at 40.96 to 41.8 SLK Preliminary Environmental Impact Assessment Figure Index Figure 1 Site Location and Declared Rare and Priority Flora (CALM Database, 2006) Appendices A Department of Environment Clearing Principles B Consultation C CALM Rare and Priority Flora Search D CALM Threatened Fauna Search 61/18768/12276 Geraldton to Mt Magnet Road at 40.96 to 41.8 SLK Preliminary Environmental Impact Assessment 1. Introduction and Project Description 1.1 Introduction GHD Pty Ltd were engaged by Main Roads Western Australia’s Mid West Region to prepare a desktop Preliminary Environmental Impact Assessment (PEIA) for an extension to the west bound passing lane on the Geraldton to Mt Magnet Road at Eradu.
    [Show full text]
  • 2007 Local Government Postal Elections Report
    WESTERN AUSTRALIAN Electoral Commission Local Government Postal Elections Election Report 2007 Foreword In October 2007, the Electoral Commissioner was made responsible for the conduct of 64 postal elections and one voting in person election under the Local Government Act 1995. By making the Electoral Commissioner responsible for these elections, the local governments concerned ensured that the elections were conducted independently and with impartiality. In addition, for those choosing postal voting, local government adopted a method of conducting elections that is more convenient for electors and typically achieves a higher rate of voter participation. Postal elections for local government were first trialled by four local governments in 1995. This increased to eight in 1997, 34 in 1999, 47 in 2001 and 55 in 2003. In 2005, 50 local governments chose the postal voting option, whilst in 2007 this rose to 64. On 20 October 2007, the 64 local governments using the postal voting method consisted of 1,202,481 electors. At the close of nominations on 13 September 2007, 715 candidates had nominated for 375 vacancies resulting in 59 postal elections. A total of 1,054,343 election packages were forwarded. A total of 68 candidates were elected unopposed and two vacancies were unfilled. A total of 94% of all electors in Western Australia had the opportunity to vote in a postal election. Postal elections have clearly become the preferred way that electors choose to participate in local decision-making in Western Australia. The conduct of these elections remains a considerable task for the Commission. A shift in the date of the election from May to October every two years; and the introduction of Preferential and Proportional Representation voting, presented additional challenges to the management of the 2007 program.
    [Show full text]
  • Statement of Capabilities
    STATEMENT OF CAPABILITIES Background OMC International Pty Ltd (OMC) is a specialist company providing consulting services and operational systems to the international maritime industry. OMC is the world’s only provider of independently validated and widely operational real-time under keel clearance technology, the proprietary Dynamic Under-keel Clearance System (DUKC®). DUKC® has safely facilitated 165,000+ transits for 120 ports, terminals and waterways, and is the most comprehensively validated UKC management system. On average, a vessel sails under DUKC® advice somewhere in the world every hour. DUKC® is the standard underkeel clearance management tool adopted by more than twenty ports within Australia, and internationally, including the world’s largest bulk export ports, container ports, and tanker facilities. DUKC® is recognised as the leading UKC management system in the world. The terms “Dynamic UKC®” and DUKC® are both registered trademarks of OMC. In addition to DUKC®, the services and systems provided by OMC to our clients include: • Mooring analysis – deep sea, CBM, conventional and suction pad mooring systems • Moored vessel motion and mooring line warning systems (Berth Warning System, BerthAlert) • Optimised channel dredging design and planning • Under-keel clearance studies • Horizontal navigation and vessel manoeuvrability studies • Fast time simulations using SimFlex4 from Force Technology • Full scale vessel motion measurement and analysis • Probabilistic analysis and risk assessments • Operational static UKC management
    [Show full text]
  • Daily Dribble Draws, Results, Top Performers & Reports
    2016 HELLOWORLD AUSTRALIAN U14 CLUB CHAMPIONSHIPS DAILY DRIBBLE DRAWS, RESULTS, TOP PERFORMERS & REPORTS 2016 HELLOWORLD AUSTRALIAN U14 CLUB CHAMPIONSHIPS DAILY DRIBBLE DRAW Friday 30th September, 2016 COMPETITION GAME TIME CRT TEAM 1 TEAM 2 U14 Boys Championship Classification 137 12:30pm M2 Horsham Hornets Canberra Gunners U14 Girls Championship Classification 138 12:30pm N7 Gold Coast Waves Nunawading Spectres U14 Boys Championship Classification 139 1:00pm M1 Hawthorn Magic Diamond Valley Eagles U14 Girls Championship Classification 140 1:00pm N1 Canberra Capitals Kalamunda Eastern Suns U14 Girls Shield Classification 141 2:00pm M2 Willetton Tigers Geraldton Buccaneers U14 Girls Shield Classification 142 2:00pm M4 Darwin Cyclones North West Tasmania U14 Girls Shield Classification 143 2:00pm N7 Maitland Mustangs NT South Suns U14 Boys Shield Semi Final 144 2:30pm M1 Coffs Harbour Newcastle Hunters U14 Girls Shield Semi Final 145 2:30pm N1 Manly Warringah Sea Eagles Southern District Spartans U14 Boys Shield Classification 146 3:30pm M2 South Adelaide North West Tasmania U14 Boys Shield Classification 147 3:30pm M4 Joondalup Wolves Cairns Marlins U14 Girls Shield Classification 148 3:30pm N7 Northern Tasmania Newcastle Hunters U14 Boys Shield Semi Final 149 4:00pm M1 Townsville Heat Southern District Spartans U14 Girls Shield Semi Final 150 4:00pm N1 Southern Tigers Illawarra Hawks U14 Girls Championship Classification 151 5:00pm M2 Townsville Heat South Adelaide U14 Boys Championship Classification 152 5:00pm M4 Norwood Flames Sturt
    [Show full text]
  • Using Deliberative Democracy for Better Urban Decision-Making Through Integrative Thinking
    Article Using Deliberative Democracy for Better Urban Decision-Making through Integrative Thinking Janette Hartz-Karp and Dora Marinova * Curtin University Sustainability Policy (CUSP) Institute, Curtin University, Perth, WA 6845, Australia; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: This article expands the evidence about integrative thinking by analyzing two case studies that applied the collaborative decision-making method of deliberative democracy which encourages representative, deliberative and influential public participation. The four-year case studies took place in Western Australia, (1) in the capital city Perth and surrounds, and (2) in the city-region of Greater Geraldton. Both aimed at resolving complex and wicked urban sustainability challenges as they arose. The analysis suggests that a new way of thinking, namely integrative thinking, emerged during the deliberations to produce operative outcomes for decision-makers. Building on theory and research demonstrating that deliberative designs lead to improved reasoning about complex issues, the two case studies show that through discourse based on deliberative norms, participants developed different mindsets, remaining open-minded, intuitive and representative of ordinary people’s basic common sense. This spontaneous appearance of integrative thinking enabled sound decision-making about complex and wicked sustainability-related urban issues. In both case studies, the participants exhibited all characteristics of integrative thinking to produce outcomes for decision-makers: salience—grasping the problems’ multiple aspects; causality—identifying multiple sources of impacts; sequencing—keeping the whole in view while focusing on specific aspects; and resolution—discovering novel ways that avoided bad choice trade-offs. Keywords: sustainability; deliberative democracy; mini-publics; integrative thinking; participatory Citation: Hartz-Karp, J.; Marinova, D.
    [Show full text]
  • Interim Report
    PARLIAMENT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA Interim Report House of Representatives Select Committee on Regional Development and Decentralisation December 2017 CANBERRA © Commonwealth of Australia ISBN 978-1-74366-759-0 (Printed Version) ISBN 978-1-74366-760-6 (HTML Version) This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution- NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Australia License. The details of this licence are available on the Creative Commons website: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/au/. Terms of Reference The inquiry’s Terms of Reference are included in the Committee's Resolution of Appointment. They are: 1 This House establish a select committee, to be known as the Select Committee on Regional Development and Decentralisation, to inquire and report on the following matters: a. best practice approaches to regional development, considering Australian and international examples, that support i. growing and sustaining the rural and regional population base; ii. the benefits of economic growth and opportunity being shared right across Australia; iii. developing the capabilities of regional Australians; iv. growing and diversifying of the regional economic and employment base; v. an improved quality of life for regional Australians; vi. vibrant, more cohesive and engaged regional communities; vii. leveraging long-term private investment; and viii.a place-based approach that considers local circumstances, competitive advantages and involves collective governance; b. decentralisation of Commonwealth entities or functions, as a mechanism to increase growth and prosperity in regional areas, considering Australian and international examples, including: i. examining the potential for decentralisation to improve governance and service delivery for all Australians, considering the administrative arrangements required for good government; iii iv ii.
    [Show full text]
  • Geraldton Mt Magnet Road SLK 222.45 Biological Survey May 2012
    Main Roads Western Australia Report for Material Source Area: Geraldton Mt Magnet Road SLK 222.45 Biological Survey May 2012 This Report: has been prepared by GHD for Main Roads Western Australia (MRWA) and may only be used and relied on by MRWA for the purpose agreed between GHD and MRWA as set out in section 1.3 of this Report. GHD otherwise disclaims responsibility to any person other than MRWA arising in connection with this Report. GHD also excludes implied warranties and conditions, to the extent legally permissible. The services undertaken by GHD in connection with preparing this Report were limited to those specifically detailed in the Report and are subject to the scope limitations set out in the Report. The opinions, conclusions and any recommendations in this Report are based on conditions encountered and information reviewed at the date of preparation of the Report. GHD has no responsibility or obligation to update this Report to account for events or changes occurring subsequent to the date that the Report was prepared. The opinions, conclusions and any recommendations in this Report are based on assumptions made by GHD described in this Report. GHD disclaims liability arising from any of the assumptions being incorrect. GHD has prepared this Report on the basis of information provided by MRWA and others who provided information to GHD (including Government authorities), which GHD has not independently verified or checked beyond the agreed scope of work. GHD does not accept liability in connection with such unverified information, including errors and omissions in the Report which were caused by errors or omissions in that information.” The opinions, conclusions and any recommendations in this Report are based on information obtained from, and testing undertaken at or in connection with, specific sample points.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Geraldton 2050 Cycling Strategy
    Department of Transport GERALDTON 2050 CYCLING STRATEGY 2018 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Cities and towns with high levels of cycling enjoy a range of economic, environmental and social benefits. Not only is cycling proven to reduce traffic congestion and improve air quality, it also helps to create more vibrant and welcoming communities. Cycling can facilitate new forms of industry (such as cycle-tourism) and more generally, it enables people to live happier, healthier and more active lives. Fundamentally, increasing cycling mode share is about improving quality of life – something that is critical for attracting and retaining people in regional areas. The key to increasing cycling mode share is In developing this strategy, extensive consultation providing infrastructure which is not only safe has been undertaken with key stakeholders and and convenient, but also competitive against the local community. The consultation has helped other modes of transport. To achieve this, cycling to refine the overarching aims and objectives of needs to be prioritised ahead of other modes in the strategy, as well as clarify the community’s appropriate locations and integrated with adjoining expectations in terms of where key routes are land use. If we are serious about reducing car most needed and the requirements of different dependency and helping people make better user groups. transport choices in Geraldton, these priorities There are a number of opportunities to create need to be reflected in the way our communities world-class facilities in Geraldton. Major new are planned. road projects planned for the region should Over the past five years, the City of Greater enable the development of parallel pedestrian Geraldton (the City) has delivered a number of and cycling facilities.
    [Show full text]