Operation - by July 1960
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
.. "' .. " " " I U "i U I ItJ.A ::; A merica ~ ChM:J new:Jpap€l' _~~,;;-=_.~ ___ ____. ____ __~ '~opyright 1960 by ullited Stales Che$S ."••• '."c .". ",.,"'-_____________ - --, 7""':::0::--- Vol. XlV, No. 13 Saturday, March 5, 1960 15 Cents ALL'S WELL THAT ENDS WELL Masterinll the End (; ome Bv W AtTER KOnN. EfiilO' of Meo AMERICANA (Il l-Maryin Palmer Man'in live~ in Detroit, and although his talents have been dormant lately. he has composed quile a Jot of end·game ~ ludies. Quite a ,ale Iwr:gs around this miniature. (Diagram 76) Sec solution on page 8. Looking at this gem recently, I rcalizcd that I had seen the idea elsewhere. True, it was one of ReU's studies, published in 1928, the only difference being that Reti has the Black rook on Black'S Q·3. and an additional White pawn , on White's Q3. His solution ran; •.. 1. P-Q4, RxQP ; 2. P·K7, R·Q3ch; -,"",".~ . i~·N7, R-QI: 4. K·B7, winning as ~b(;\'e. but adding the minor varia· •• don 1. _.... _.. , K·B2; 2. P·Q5, RxQP; , 3. P·K7 etc. (Continued, with solution, Column I, 8) FISCHER BE ING PHOTOGRAPH ED AFTER FI NAL ROUND WIN OVER SMYSLOV 5000 Hat a,e /"" m"'~ pllOtOg,~ph, /ah" by K", H~r/r.rlelS a/ B~lgrad~, Y"solfa'l'ia, -MEMBERS the J..., Ih~ I,HI ,0",,,1 of du 1959 World Ca"J,d"u, T"""'anum "'''' pl"y.d. Operation - By July 1960 Colorado Story- The Perfecter! PIIIII From: Fred Cramer, General Membe rship Chairman To: Ju .. n J. Reid, Colorado Membership Chairman Colorado shows a sensational gain, from 15 mCJllher~ a y('ar ago to 53! Drop me a li ne, telling me how it was donI;' ... From: Juan J. Reid, Colorado Membership Chairman To: Fred Cramer, General Membership Ch ai rma n The increase in USCF memberShip in Colorari0 is uUt' mainly to a few ideas and the concentrated effort of a few key people. Organiza· tion of the Colorauo State Chess Association 11I st year united our chess leaders in a common effort to promote the game. The CSCA di rectors. Ben Kriegh of Boulder, AI Hulme ~ of Den\'er. and Warren Barter of Pueblo, were in agree me nt that the USCF was the best instrument to promote chess for the typical club in the outlying provinces as well as at the national level, and they became the Membership Committee for OPERATION M. As a result the USCF program was publicized at the club level, at CSCA meetings, and through the eSCA Newsletter. The CSCA adopted the requireme nt of USCF membershi !J for par· ticipation in the state tournament. The Denver YMCA CC inaugurated r Ol li ng tournaments {or USCF members. The promise of national rat· ings brought out the best players in the state for the 1959 tourna ment, and the number of entries was 43% greater tha n the previous year. Special recognition must be given two men. Dr. George Pipiringos of the De nver YMCA CC and the 1958 state champion. was (:11 indcfati· gable worker for OPERATION M. Hans Berline r, member of the Martin Co. CC of LiUleton, USC F Master and 1959 Colorado champion, offered simultaneous exhibitions at 52.00 per board. or free to anyone joining OlAFSSON MAKING A F INAL ROuND MOVE. (HE WON FROM (Continued on page 2) KERES) Make your plans now U.S. OPEN CHAMPIONSHIP- August 8·19 RATINGS SUPPLEMENT to attend one of these Hotel Sheraton·J efferson. Sl. Louis, Missouri. USeF Ratings, reflecting performances up to and including some of top·notch USCF·rated. U.S. AMATEUR CHAMPIONSHIP-May 28, 29, the 1959 Labor Day events, are included in this issue, beginning on tournaments. Details 30---Ashu ry Park. New Jersey. Page 3. Inquiries 01" complaints about your ratings should be ad· late r in CHESS LIFE. GREATER NEW YORK OPEN CHAMPION· dl"e~ se d to Frank Brady, U.S.C.F. Rating Statistician, 80 East 11 th St.. SHIP-June 24, 25, 26-New York, N.Y. New York 3, N.Y. OPERATION M- Ill. AU the principal rating systems arc basically identical even (Continued from page 1) though the formulae used for the computation of the ratings may super USCF. Several clubs have sponsored Hans' exhibitions, and others arc ficially look different. The fact is that when the formulae are general· due to follow. ized they are either of identical algebraic form or if of scemingly dif Don 't count Colorado's OPERATION i\t as concluded. We have just ferent form derivable from one another. This fact was quite unsuspected started! at the beginning of this study. From: Fred Cramer, General Membership Chairman The oscillatory character and the uncertainty in the ratings may To: All State and Local Membership Chairmen be demonstrated by the following oversimplified example. Suppose that Formula for membership success-thm's the Colorado story. It has I WO evenly rated players A & 8 playa match by correspomlence one t:verythingl Notice the leadership, the working together of the leaders, game at OJ time and that they are rerated after each game. Lei it be lhe concentratcd crforts of those named, the all·out propaganda cam further assumed that the players alternate wi nning games. (Each could, paign, followed by the action-producing activit ies (rated tournaments, say, exploit the advantage of the first move and win with the white Be!'liner simuls). And what a fillc thing it has been' for chess in Colo· pjeccs.) This order is not important but simplifies the computations. ["ado, and for the Chess organization in Colorado. A sweet smooth op For the computations the Chess Review system will be used as the 50 eration. a model for any Sl<ite~ All hats off to Juan Rcid and crew~ rating point value of a game and the 10% handicap term gives nice round figures to work with. This 5ystem will be described later. Lastiy THE USCF RATING SYSTEM assume that the rating: of each player is 1000 at the beginning of the A progress report by: match and let the ratings be computed after each game and tabulated Arpad E. Elo thus: - A's rating 8's rating Difference (A· !:» I l" h" p",tml P' u .F~ " r~p '''1 by Ih~ ch"",,,,,,, of Ih< co",,,,,t/u "pp(}ml~d /0 At beginning ........ .............. 1000 1000 o " "., Ih,' n "rkll~ H Kat ,,,.!; ~)j t<"' , ,,,,d. If ,'O"lld,'"J d. ",,,bl< "lid ,<al,bl., 10 ,,:c. After A wins · ...... ... ' ... ........ 1050 950 100 u""",'"J 1/,,· "dvptloll of ""Pt<lY"''''' I/ H, I. pI,·tOli l Ih.· COl/UTIlI "f 1<11 Ih"l1 /11'0 of After B wins ... .... ..... ......_ .. 990 1010 -20 ~)<h · I'p<· d P"'8"1 vI Ih.· 0,/"" " ·POll. Th, ~ f "" lCPl) ll ""Ii b~ ,,'"<">' , .. ", ,,,,,,"d,,, After A wins · ............... ...... 104 2 959 84 pr,,,/(d ItO l"bu q""1j1 " ",,', of C f-Jl::~ S LIFE. After 8 wins · ... .. .. ... .. ... .. 984 1016 -32 Introduction: Alter A wins ........ .............. 1037 963 74 The USCF ratings and the rating system itself as devised by ,",If. Etc. Kennech Harkness have become the object of a great deal of contro Now if the calculations arc continued with the ~OJmc pattern of vel '>y ',lilhin the American chess fraternity. 1'0 rcsolve this controversy wins it will be cvident that the differences in th~ two ratings. both the PresIdent Jerry Spann early this year appointed a COlllllllllee consisting plus and minus, aPP!'oach a value of 55 and the rating ~ approach the uJ VI'. Erich Marchand, Mr. Guthrie l\"Ic Clain and the writer ' to study figures 972.5 and 1027.5 respectively. Aftcr these figures arc reached t"e malter and to make such recommendations as would C[fect an lhe riltings of the two playcrs will mercly oscillate between the two impruvclllt'nt in the rating system. This report summanzc" lh e findings extrcmes bUl will never again be equal to 1000 or to on :! anotile!". Mani· and some of the recommendations that have developed ow of the study festly th e example chosen IS far fctched but it docs i![ustrate the un· tllUS lar. ('ertainty principle. A similar situation would result in a match between At (ht' outset the commillee acccpted a definition of the objective two unusual players provided that the win·Joss pattern bears som ~ rela· of a lacing system us stated by Mr. C. H. Bone of the Texas Chess Asso· tion 10 the probabilily oC either player winning. It should be apparent lla Li on, !:amely; then that all Ihat can bc said of any rating is that it is somewhere "THE RATING SYSTEM SHALL PROVIDE: AS CLOSE AN ESTI· within a I'ange of values and not something which is absolutely definite. j.;. A rE AS POSSIBLE OF THE CURRENT PLAYING STRENGTH (To be continued) Of 'l'rIl:: INutVlDUAL AS CO!\lPUTED mml HIS PBRI·'ORM· ANI.l:: iN COMPETITION WITH OTHEtl PLAYERS AND MEAS BRASKET WINS NORTH CENTRAL OPEN uRED ALOi\ Li AN ARBITRARY ARITHMETIC SCALE." Milwaukee. Wis.- Curl Brasket, Minneapolis, triumphed over a field Som o: 01 inC cGlu rovcrsy in the past has resuited from an improper of 90 pl:lycrs to win the uth Annu1l1 North Central Open here. A half • understanding of the objectives of a rating system; some has re~ulted (rom a lack of appreciation of the limitations of any rating systems. The point in arrears, splitting 2nd and 3rd prize and a share' of die Merit Harkness system has been criticized for not showing past achievements fund were Hans Berliner, Littleton, Colorado, Charles Henin, Chicago, and Martin Harrow, Ind ianapOlis.