Ecogeography and Demography of Cicer Judaicum Boiss., a Wild Annual Relative of Domesticated Chickpea

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Ecogeography and Demography of Cicer Judaicum Boiss., a Wild Annual Relative of Domesticated Chickpea Published online April 25, 2006 Ecogeography and Demography of Cicer judaicum Boiss., a Wild Annual Relative of Domesticated Chickpea Roi Ben-David, Simcha Lev-Yadun, Canan Can, and Shahal Abbo* ABSTRACT domesticated chickpea compared with other cool season Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) is a major pulse crop in the Indian grain legumes (e.g., Abbo et al., 2003; Siddique et al., subcontinent and other world regions and is characterized by narrow 1999; Turner et al., 2001). Indeed, in their review of adaptation relative to other cool season food legumes. Comparative pulse crops adaptation in the Canadian and U.S. northern ecophysiology employing closely related wild species is a powerful Great Plains, Miller et al. (2002) noted that chickpea has tool to broaden the understanding of the genetic and physiological an “unusual response to growth season rainfall” and that basis of crop adaptation. However, meager data are available on the pea and lentils had broader adaptation compared with ecological preferences of annual wild Cicer species. Moreover, the chickpea. Miller et al. (2002) also stressed that “compar- geographic range, its size, shape, and boundaries as well as its in- ative adaptation among pulse crops remains poorly un- ternal structure have never been studied for any of the wild Cicer taxa, derstood.” Regardless of the evolutionary and agronomic thereby limiting our understanding of Cicer biology. Accordingly, this work focused on Israeli C. judaicum Boiss. a wild annual relative of reasons for the failure of chickpea to occupy a major chickpea. We defined the range of the species across the Mediterra- niche among the autumn sown crops of temperate lati- nean zone of Israel, characterized the ecogeographical profile of its tudes, understanding the genetic and physiological basis habitats and studied two populated sites at the macro- and microsite of adaptation is fundamental for future improvement of levels in terms of plant density, frequency, and niche physical char- chickpea and other crop plants (e.g., Evans, 1993). acteristics. Throughout the survey area the species is mostly confined The closely related wild relatives of crop plants pro- to stony and rocky niches where competition with more aggressive vide excellent material to study the potential adaptation annuals is small. This habitat preference dictates a patchy distribution spectrum of the respective crops (Evans, 1993). Eco- pattern at all levels, from local niche to the region and beyond. physiology and comparative physiology are key compo- nents in such an approach (therein), provided there HICKPEA is a grain legume associated with the ini- is a wide range of germplasm lines representing a suf- Ctiation of agriculture in the Neolithic Near East ficiently wide ecological spectrum. In the case of Cicer, (Lev-Yadun et al., 2000; Zohary and Hopf, 2000). An- however, the number of independent wild annual acces- nual world production of chickpea amounts to approx- sions found in genebanks is relatively small (Berger et al., imately 8 3 106 Mg, a lion’s share of it (94%) in devel- 2003). The data available from the annual Cicer world oping countries, mainly in the Indian subcontinent collection indicate that they provide incomplete coverage (FAO, 2006). Large population sectors in India and its of the geographical distribution of the taxa and thus prob- neighboring countries, many of them vegetarian, depend ably also of their genetic diversity (Berger et al., 2003). on chickpea as a main dietary protein source, while in As part of our ongoing project aimed at broadening developed countries it is considered a health food (e.g., the understanding of the genetic and physiological basis Abbo et al., 2005). of chickpea adaptation, we focused in this study on C. In a recent review on the evolution of domesticated judaicum, an annual wild taxon and a member of the chickpea (Abbo et al., 2003), the authors suggested that tertiary genepool of the cultigen (Ladizinsky and Adler, the restricted distribution of C. reticulatum Ladiz. (the 1976). This species is cross-compatible with C. bijugum immediate wild progenitor) poses severe limitations on Rech. f., which grows in higher latitudes (Ladizinsky and the adaptation of the crop. These authors hypothesized Adler, 1976), making both taxa suitable parents for seg- that the narrow adaptation of C. reticulatum (as deduced regating populations to study the genetic basis of adap- from its restricted natural distribution) represents (or tation (Abbo et al., 2003; Berger et al., 2003). The stems from) limited genetic variation in key adaptive loci specific aims of this work were as follows: first, to define (e.g., temperature and day-length response genes and the geographic range of C. judaicum across the Medi- edaphic requirements). Further, this narrow genetic vari- terranean zones of Israel and characterize this range by ation could partly account for the adaptive limitations of its size, shape, boundaries and internal structure; second, to identify ecogeographic patterns in the distribution of R. Ben-David and S. Abbo, The Robert H. Smith Institute of Plant C. judaicum by using Geographic Information Systems Science and Genetics in Agriculture, The Hebrew University of (GIS) and multivariate analyses; and third, to charac- Jerusalem, P.O. Box 12, Rehovot 76100, Israel; S. Lev-Yadun, terize the local spatial pattern of C. judaicum plants, Reproduced from Crop Science. Published by Crop Science Society of America. All copyrights reserved. Department of Biology, Faculty of Science and Science Education, their density, frequency, and preferred microhabitats by University of Haifa-Oranim, Tivon 36006, Israel; C. Can, Department focusing on two selected populations. of Biology, University of Gaziantep, 27310, Turkey. Received 12 Oct. 2005. *Corresponding author ([email protected]). Published in Crop Sci. 46:1360–1370 (2006). MATERIALS AND METHODS Plant Genetic Resources Survey Procedure doi:10.2135/cropsci2005.10-0351 ª Crop Science Society of America A field survey was held during the growth seasons 677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA (November–April) of 2002, 2003, 2004, and 2005 searching 1360 BEN-DAVID ET AL.: ECOLOGY OF WILD CICER JUDAICUM 1361 for C. judaicum populations across 236 sites in central and PCA Analysis northern Israel, excluding most of the West Bank area. First, localities that were documented in the herbarium of the Hebrew Principal component analysis (PCA) of the continuous University of Jerusalem or in the “ROTEM” database (BioGis, ecogeographical variables was used to identify a smaller num- 2002) were visited. Second, typical “like-habitats” were sampled ber of principal components to account for most of the using the “search image” concept (Engels et al., 1995). To es- ecogeographical variance among 52 sites populated with C. tablish presence or absence patterns, ecogeographic data was judaicum. PCA was based on the correlation matrix and collected for each site irrespectively of whether C. judaicum was presented as biplot ordinations of populated sites (PC scores) found. In each site, latitude, longitude, and altitude were de- and ecogeographical variables (PC factor loading). Actual termined by GPS, and location descriptors (geographical region, populated sites were depicted in the ordination by plotting road or settlement name, proximity to prominent land marks) sites’ principal component scores using a unique symbol for and site physical characteristics (habitat type, slope, aspect, each cluster of sites. Three components were extracted by and precise location of target species plants at the site, if found) Eigenvales .1 to ensure meaningful implementation of the were recorded. Ecogeographical data were extracted from the data by each factor. PCA and hierarchical clustering was Geographic Information System (GIS) center of the Hebrew applied by SPSS v.12 (SPSS, 2002). University of Jerusalem and from maps of the Israel meteo- rological service (for annual and monthly rainfall, monthly Ecological Assay minimum and maximum temperature, soil type, lithology, asso- ciated species, vegetation cover, and distance to nearer The ecological assay, aimed at characterizing the local con- settlement, road, or reserve). To ensure independence between ditions at the populated site level, was preformed at Nahal observations and avoid autocorrelations, a minimal distance of A’naba and Nahal Mea’ra (Fig. 1) on four different dates 2 km between sites was kept (Legendre, 1993; Guisan and (March 2002 and three dates during 2003 season: early Jan- Zimmerman, 2000). On the basis of the presence–absence data, uary, end of February and early April). In addition, two long a “dot map” was constructed by the GIS software ArcView3.2 transects, extending from south to north and from west to east, (ESRI, 2002). were undertaken in each site during the 2003 season to obtain a rough estimate of the spatial size of the two populations. Multivariate Analysis The N. A’naba site is located southeast of Modii’n town and consists of four slopes: southeast, west, northwest and east The following 11 ecogeographical variables were used in facing slopes. The N. Mea’ra site is located at Judea foothills all multivariate techniques: longitude (Ln), latitude (Lt), alti- and consists of two contrasting, south and north facing slopes. tude (Al), annual rainfall (Rn-A), mean and minimum tem- Both sites are under seasonal grazing, cattle at N. A’naba and perature in January, representing peak winter conditions sheep at N. Mea’ra. (mean and minimum winter temperature- Tmean-W, Tmin- Demographic surveys in both sites were performed along W), mean and maximum temperature in August represent- random transects across the different slopes (2–4 transects per ing peak summer conditions (mean and maximum summer slope) aiming to maximize microsite topographic variability. temperature—Tmean-S, Tmax-S), slope direction relative to Transects position relative to slope direction was random. the north (S-D), slope rate in percentage (S-R), and distance to Each transect (50 3 0.5 m) consisted of 25 sampling units of sea (Dis-S). For the implementation of discriminant analysis 1m2 each.
Recommended publications
  • Memory Trace Fazal Sheikh
    MEMORY TRACE FAZAL SHEIKH 2 3 Front and back cover image: ‚ ‚ 31°50 41”N / 35°13 47”E Israeli side of the Separation Wall on the outskirts of Neve Yaakov and Beit Ḥanīna. Just beyond the wall lies the neighborhood of al-Ram, now severed from East Jerusalem. Inside front and inside back cover image: ‚ ‚ 31°49 10”N / 35°15 59”E Palestinian side of the Separation Wall on the outskirts of the Palestinian town of ʿAnata. The Israeli settlement of Pisgat Ze’ev lies beyond in East Jerusalem. This publication takes its point of departure from Fazal Sheikh’s Memory Trace, the first of his three-volume photographic proj- ect on the Israeli–Palestinian conflict. Published in the spring of 2015, The Erasure Trilogy is divided into three separate vol- umes—Memory Trace, Desert Bloom, and Independence/Nakba. The project seeks to explore the legacies of the Arab–Israeli War of 1948, which resulted in the dispossession and displacement of three quarters of the Palestinian population, in the establishment of the State of Israel, and in the reconfiguration of territorial borders across the region. Elements of these volumes have been exhibited at the Slought Foundation in Philadelphia, Storefront for Art and Architecture, the Brooklyn Museum of Art, and the Pace/MacGill Gallery in New York, and will now be presented at the Al-Ma’mal Foundation for Contemporary Art in East Jerusalem, and the Khalil Sakakini Cultural Center in Ramallah. In addition, historical documents and materials related to the history of Al-’Araqīb, a Bedouin village that has been destroyed and rebuilt more than one hundred times in the ongoing “battle over the Negev,” first presented at the Slought Foundation, will be shown at Al-Ma’mal.
    [Show full text]
  • Greater Jerusalem” Has Jerusalem (Including the 1967 Rehavia Occupied and Annexed East Jerusalem) As Its Centre
    4 B?63 B?466 ! np ! 4 B?43 m D"D" np Migron Beituniya B?457 Modi'in Bei!r Im'in Beit Sira IsraelRei'ut-proclaimed “GKharbrathae al Miasbah ter JerusaBeitl 'Uer al Famuqa ” D" Kochav Ya'akov West 'Ein as Sultan Mitzpe Danny Maccabim D" Kochav Ya'akov np Ma'ale Mikhmas A System of Settler-Colonialism and Apartheid Deir Quruntul Kochav Ya'akov East ! Kafr 'Aqab Kh. Bwerah Mikhmas ! Beit Horon Duyuk at Tahta B?443 'Ein ad D" Rafat Jericho 'Ajanjul ya At Tira np ya ! Beit Liq Qalandi Kochav Ya'akov South ! Lebanon Neve Erez ¥ ! Qalandiya Giv'at Ze'ev D" a i r Jaba' y 60 Beit Duqqu Al Judeira 60 B? a S Beit Nuba D" B? e Atarot Ind. Zone S Ar Ram Ma'ale Hagit Bir Nabala Geva Binyamin n Al Jib a Beit Nuba Beit 'Anan e ! Giv'on Hahadasha n a r Mevo Horon r Beit Ijza e t B?4 i 3 Dahiyat al Bareed np 6 Jaber d Aqbat e Neve Ya'akov 4 M Yalu B?2 Nitaf 4 !< ! ! Kharayib Umm al Lahim Qatanna Hizma Al Qubeiba ! An Nabi Samwil Ein Prat Biddu el Almon Har Shmu !< Beit Hanina al Balad Kfar Adummim ! Beit Hanina D" 436 Vered Jericho Nataf B? 20 B? gat Ze'ev D" Dayr! Ayyub Pis A 4 1 Tra Beit Surik B?37 !< in Beit Tuul dar ! Har A JLR Beit Iksa Mizpe Jericho !< kfar Adummim !< 21 Ma'ale HaHamisha B? 'Anata !< !< Jordan Shu'fat !< !< A1 Train Ramat Shlomo np Ramot Allon D" Shu'fat !< !< Neve Ilan E1 !< Egypt Abu Ghosh !< B?1 French Hill Mishor Adumim ! B?1 Beit Naqquba !< !< !< ! Beit Nekofa Mevaseret Zion Ramat Eshkol 1 Israeli Police HQ Mesilat Zion B? Al 'Isawiya Lifta a Qulunyia ! Ma'alot Dafna Sho'eva ! !< Motza Sheikh Jarrah !< Motza Illit Mishor Adummim Ind.
    [Show full text]
  • Israeli Settler-Colonialism and Apartheid Over Palestine
    Metula Majdal Shams Abil al-Qamh ! Neve Ativ Misgav Am Yuval Nimrod ! Al-Sanbariyya Kfar Gil'adi ZZ Ma'ayan Baruch ! MM Ein Qiniyye ! Dan Sanir Israeli Settler-Colonialism and Apartheid over Palestine Al-Sanbariyya DD Al-Manshiyya ! Dafna ! Mas'ada ! Al-Khisas Khan Al-Duwayr ¥ Huneen Al-Zuq Al-tahtani ! ! ! HaGoshrim Al Mansoura Margaliot Kiryat !Shmona al-Madahel G GLazGzaGza!G G G ! Al Khalsa Buq'ata Ethnic Cleansing and Population Transfer (1948 – present) G GBeGit GHil!GlelG Gal-'A!bisiyya Menara G G G G G G G Odem Qaytiyya Kfar Szold In order to establish exclusive Jewish-Israeli control, Israel has carried out a policy of population transfer. By fostering Jewish G G G!G SG dGe NG ehemia G AGl-NGa'iGmaG G G immigration and settlements, and forcibly displacing indigenous Palestinians, Israel has changed the demographic composition of the ¥ G G G G G G G !Al-Dawwara El-Rom G G G G G GAmG ir country. Today, 70% of Palestinians are refugees and internally displaced persons and approximately one half of the people are in exile G G GKfGar GB!lGumG G G G G G G SGalihiya abroad. None of them are allowed to return. L e b a n o n Shamir U N D ii s e n g a g e m e n tt O b s e rr v a tt ii o n F o rr c e s Al Buwayziyya! NeoG t MG oGrdGecGhaGi G ! G G G!G G G G Al-Hamra G GAl-GZawG iyGa G G ! Khiyam Al Walid Forcible transfer of Palestinians continues until today, mainly in the Southern District (Beersheba Region), the historical, coastal G G G G GAl-GMuGftskhara ! G G G G G G G Lehavot HaBashan Palestinian towns ("mixed towns") and in the occupied West Bank, in particular in the Israeli-prolaimed “greater Jerusalem”, the Jordan G G G G G G G Merom Golan Yiftah G G G G G G G Valley and the southern Hebron District.
    [Show full text]
  • Ngo Documents 2013-11-01 00:00:00 Financing the Israeli Occupation the Current Involvement Of
    Financing the Israeli Occupation The Current Involvement of Israeli Banks in Israeli Settlement Activity Flash Report November 2013 In October 2010, Who Profits published a report about the Israeli banks' involvement in the Israeli occupation. The Israeli banks provide the financial infrastructure for activities of companies, governmental agencies and individuals in the occupied Palestinian territories and the Syrian Golan Heights. Who Profits' research identified six categories in which Israeli banks are involved in the occupation: providing mortgage loans for homebuyers in settlements; providing financial services to settlements' local authorities; providing special loans for construction projects in settlements; operating branches in Israeli settlements; providing financial services to businesses in settlements; and benefiting from access to the Palestinian monetary market as a captured market. Additionally, as Who Profits' report shows, it is evident that the banks are well aware of the types and whereabouts of the activity that is being carried out with their financial assistance. Our new flash report reveals that all the Israeli banks are still heavily involved in financing Israeli settlements, providing services to settlements and financially supporting construction project on occupied land. Contents: Dexia Israel .......................................................................................................................................... 2 Hapoalim Bank ...................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • A Political-Urban Action Plan to Create a Greater Jerusalem and Prevent Its Division To
    A political-urban action plan to create a Greater Jerusalem and prevent its division To: Re: The "Jerusalem Shield" Program, a political-urban action plan to create a Greater Jerusalem and prevent its division We are honored to present to you the Jerusalem Shield Program - a political-urban action plan to strengthen united Jerusalem and prevent its division. It was formulated on the backdrop of our great concern over the dangerous plan for dividing the city supported in the past by important people in the national and international arenas, such as Ehud Barak and Ehud Olmert, as well as Bill Clinton and John Kerry. In addition, former Minister Chaim Ramon and several former IDF generals have proposed a division plan under the misleading name, "The Movement to Save Jewish Jerusalem." If a plan such as the above was ever to be implemented, it would expose the city to very grave security and demographic threats, undermine and destabilize Jerusalem's status as Israel's capital city, damage its delicate urban fabric, and greatly weaken the city in general. This would have ripple effects throughout Israel. The "Jerusalem Shield" Program was written over the course of the past year by a team of experts who, by the nature of their work, have long accompanied the national and religious struggle for Jerusalem, as well as the challenges faced by the city as an urban center and a capital with uniquely complex and difficult problems. The objectives of our program are as follows: • To preserve united Jerusalem under Israeli sovereignty, for the benefit of all its citizens, both Jews and Arabs, predicated upon the rights of the Jewish nation to the city.
    [Show full text]
  • Of 19 a List of Companies Targeted for Divestment by Institutional Investors Around the World Due to Their Complicity In
    A list of companies targeted for divestment by institutional investors around the world due to their complicity in severe violations of human rights and international law in the Israeli occupation of Palestinian lands and in the attacks on Gaza. Companies traded in the United States: THE BOEING COMPANY The Boeing Company is a multinational arms manufacturer headquartered in Chicago, Illinois. In 2012, it was listed as the second largest arms supplier in the world. The company has provided Israel with AH-64 Apache helicopters, F-15 Eagle fighter jets, Hellfire missiles (produced with Lockheed Martin), as well as MK84 2000-lb bombs, Joint Direct Attack Munitions (JDAM) kits that turn bombs into “smart,” guided bombs, and the Harpoon sea- to-sea missile system. The Israeli Air Force uses various other Boeing aircraft for transport and refueling, and is anticipating the delivery of Bell Boeing V-22 aircraft. Boeing has long-term cooperation agreements with the Israeli weapons industry that include the development of the Arrow anti-ballistic missile system (with Israel Aerospace Industries) and the marketing in the US of the Israeli UAV military drones Hermes 450 and 900. Apache helicopters and Hellfire missile-equipped drones are the primary tools used by Israel for attacks on urban Palestinian areas and “targeted assassinations.” Human Rights Watch, Amnesty International, and United Nations commissions have reported the repeated and regular use of weapons in human rights violations and war crimes committed by the Israeli military in Lebanon, the West Bank, and Gaza. According to the UN’s Fact-Finding Mission to the Gaza Conflict, missiles fired from Apache helicopters targeted civilians during Operation Cast Lead in Gaza in 2008-9.
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents
    Table of Contents From the Editors 3 From the President 4 From the Executive Director 5 AJS 2013 Conference Plenary Session Plenary Lecture: From Wissenschaft des Judentums to Jewish Scholarship Today: The Issues We Have Faced and Those That Lie before Us 8 Michael Meyer Response: The Place of Jewish Studies: Discipline, Interdiscipline, and Identity Studies 10 Rachel Havrelock The Land Issue The Land vs. the land 12 Ben-Yehudah—the Belorussian Hero: Julie E. Cooper Jewish Heritage and the New Belorussian National Identity Project 46 The Land Within and Without: Magdalena Waligórska The Cycle of Israel’s Life 14 Nili Wazana A Tree Grows in Berlin 48 Leslie Morris Architecture, Landscape, and Rabbinic Place-Making 18 Land: Holy Land, Homeland, Holy Land 54 Gil Klein Anita Shapira (Home)land: Reflections on Andalusi Jewish God on Earth: Rav Kook, ’Erez. Yisra’el, and the Attachment to Place 20 Re-Enchantment of Political Zionism 56 Ross Brann Yehudah Mirsky Jews and the Land in Early Modern Germany: Yedi‘at Ha-’arez. Reclaimed: Classic Zionist Ideology Responses to Crisis and Natural Disaster 26 in the Advance of West Bank Settlement 58 Dean Bell Eric Fleisch A Land Flowing with Milk and Honey: Hiking in Israel: Why Are These Trails Different? 62 Birobidzhan and Jewish National Cosmopolitanism 28 Shay Rabineau David Shneer LandWork: Israel, Nakba, Memory 64 Jews and the Geography of Contest in the Rebecca Stein American Frontier West 34 David Koffman Ottolenghi: A Love Story 66 Ari Ariel Lower East Side Landings 36 Jonathan Boyarin and Elissa Sampson Emily Jacir: The Place Beyond 68 Carol Zemel Hallowed Ground: National and Otherwise 44 Oren Kosansky Places vs.
    [Show full text]
  • “Priority Initiatives” of the Good Water Neighbors Project
    EcoPeace Middle East Community Based Problem Solving on Water Issues Cross-border “Priority Initiatives” of the Good Water Neighbors Project November, 2016 EcoPeace Middle East Amman, Bethlehem and Tel Aviv Shared Watersheds of Israel/Palestine/Jordan Haifa K Sea of is Jordan Galilee h o n Valley RC /M u Afula Ya k q v ou a ne’ m ta el Yar Ta b vor Ara Yi ssa kha N. Shuneh H r H ar Irbid ad od era Jenin Tabket Fahel u Nar Ziglab Hadera Ab Beit Shean Alexander Ajlun Zomar Netanya Tulkarem Kfar Saba Kalkilya Dier Alla Nablus Qana r Fa Yarkon ra e a v Zark Tel Aviv i R Salt n Salfit a A d uja r Ramallah o Auja J Amman Sorek Qelt Ashdod Jericho Jerusalem N S. Shuneh ar/ Sarar Kidron Ubedia Madaba Ashkelon Bethlehem Hof Ashkelon RC Gaza Hebron Yatta Gaza Dead Sea Eshkol RC B Hebron e s o r a Karak Shev Beer Tamar RC South Ghour er Sheva׳Be Sketch not to scale EcoPeace Middle East Community Based Problem Solving on Water Issues Cross-border “Priority Initiatives” of the Good Water Neighbors Project November, 2016 EcoPeace GWN Priority Initiatives Team: Yana Abu Taleb, Regional Projects Manager; Jordan Deputy Director Shelly Lev-Sherman, Israeli GWN Project Manager Malek Abualfailat , Palestinian GWN Project Manager Abdel Rahman Sultan, Jordanian GWN Project Manager Mira Edelstein, Mohammad Bundokji and Gidon Bromberg, Editors EcoPeace Middle East is a unique organization at the forefront of the environmental peacemaking movement. As a tri-lateral organization that brings together Jordanian, Palestinian, and Israeli environmentalists, our primary objective is the promotion of cooperative efforts to protect our shared environmental heritage.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Transport Tariff Reform Is Under Way!
    Making travel safer and faster! THE THE CHARGING DRIVING IS ON US IS ON ME Gush Dan is moving forward to independent charging Beginning December 21, 2018, it will not be possible to purchase ride tickets or to charge your Rav Kav with bus drivers in Gush Dan (Ring 1).* Senior citizens will continue to be able to purchase paper tickets from the driver. Passengers without a charged Rav Kav will be able to purchase a charged anonymous Rav-Kav card from the driver charged with a single-ride fare for 10.90 NIS. *Cities included in Ring 1: Yishrash | Rishon Lezion | Be’er Yaakov | Nir Zvi | Matzliah | Ramle | Lod | Zeitan | Bat Yam | Mikve Yisrael | Holon | Azor Tel Aviv-Jaffa | Mishmar Hashiva | Beit Dagan | Ganot | Kfar Chabad | Hemed | Or Yehuda | Givatayim | Ramat Gan | Kiryat Ono | Givat Shmuel Bnei Brak | Ahiezer | Yagel | Yehud Monosson | Savyon | Magshimim | Ganei Tikva | Gat Rimon | Maas | Petah Tikva | Kfar Sirkin On intra-city and inter-city lines beginning or ending in cities outside of Ring 1, there will be no change to the method of payment or charging. For your convenience, there are variety of ways to load your Rav Kav card before boarding: Select store branches, “Al-Hakav” Service Centers Automatic kiosks, and businesses at the CBS and throughout Gush Dan Self-loading Machines in Gush Dan Rav Kav card issuing and charging service* around Gush Dan and at train stations by credit card/cash by credit card/cash by credit card/cash Home Computer From your mobile phone, on the Casponet ATMs with a dedicated card reader Rav Kav Online and Hopon apps throughout Gush Dan – with no fee and Hopon on Android NFC-supported devices by credit card by credit card by credit card On Dan lines only is it possible to pay for a single ride, without a transfer and eligibility discounts, with the Hopon application Charge before you board For card-charging points: www.trans-reform.org.il | call center 8787 Personal Rav-Kav cards are available at the “Al-Kav” Service Centers at no cost and anonymous Rav-Kav cards are available at a cost of NIS 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Meetings on the Frontier: the United Nations Truce Supervision Organization, the Israel-Jordan Conflict, and the Local Commanders’ Agreements, 1949-1956
    Meetings on the Frontier: The United Nations Truce Supervision Organization, the Israel-Jordan Conflict, and the Local Commanders’ Agreements, 1949-1956 Dr. Andrew Theobald The 1948 Arab-Israeli War and the Armistice Agreements that followed partitioned what had been Palestine between Egypt, the newly-created state of Israel, and Jordan. From August 1949 until the establishment of the United Nations Emergency Force in November 1956, United Nations Truce Supervision Organization (UNTSO) peacekeepers attempted to supervise the Arab-Israeli armistice, despite the unwillingness of the parties to accept an actual peace settlement. To the extent that any particular peacekeeping mission was successful, what happened on the ground is usually considered far less important than broader politics. Nonetheless, UNTSO operations, which provided a means for otherwise implacable enemies to communicate with each other, served as the most important mechanism for regional moderation and stability. An analysis of the Local Commanders’ Agreements supports this assertion. These extra-parliamentary accords helped moderate the conflict through meetings between military and police leaders, especially along the winding frontier between Israel and the Jordanian-controlled West Bank. But, for all the hopes of the United Nations, this cooperation did not lead to peace talks, in large part because Israel withheld consistent cooperation with the peacekeepers in the hopes of bringing Jordan and the other Arab states directly to the peace table. Traditionally, the strategies
    [Show full text]
  • Refugee Project Locations
    Refugee project locations Dec 1, 2018 FOR HISTORIC PHOTOS I COULD SIMPLY USE WIKI OR PALESTINE REMEMBERED √ CHECK MARK INDICATES I’VE FOUND AND PHOTOGRAPHED ✔ Beit Jibrin 21 (km) Northwest of Hebron See location number #14 on the map Bayt Jibrin was mostly destroyed with the exception of the village Mosque, an unidentified shrine, and few houses, see Pictures section for details. The village contains mosaic floors from two churches dating to the fourth and sixth centuries, and it was the burial place of Tamim Abu Ruqayya, a companion of the prophet Muhammad. Exculsive jewish colonies on town's lands Beyt Guvrin According to the Palestinian historian Walid Khalidi, the village remaining structures on the village land are: "A mosque, an unidentified shrine, and a number of houses are all that remain. The mosque, which is a stone structure, has a flat roof and round-arched high windows on all sides, as well as similarly arched doors. Some of the houses are inhabited by Jews, while others are deserted. One of the houses-a two-storey stone building with a rectangular door and windows-has been converted into an Israeli restaurant and outdoor cafe, bearing the Arabic name al-Bustan ('the garden')." ✔ Beit Nattif (for location search with Neliv ha-Lamed-He) 21 (km) Northwest of Hebron See location number #4 on the map Many of Bayt Natiff's inhabitants headed for the Hebron hills, and some stayed in the nearby caves for some time. Bayt Natiff was completely destroyed, and only house rubble left behind. Villagers mostly live in Deheishe, 'Aida, and 'Azza Refugee Camps (in the occupied Bethlehem District) The Old Testament referred to Bayt Nattif by Tappuach, and the Romans called it Beyt Letepha.
    [Show full text]
  • The Story of Hasan Mustafa As Part of Today's Narrative by Andreas F. Kuntz in Gratitude to My Father Hermann Kuntz, Who Works
    The Story of Hasan Mustafa as Part of Today’s Narrative By Andreas F. Kuntz In gratitude to my father Hermann Kuntz, who works tirelessly for dialogue, justice and peace through understanding since 1962 Summary This article explores the relation of history, contemporary history and the meaning of stories and narratives for the Palestinian identity in the case of Battir. It examines the possible use of stories in a touristic product for Battir and the possibility of conflict-sensitive tours using the example of Hasan Mustafa and Beitar. It argues for a conscious and critical use of stories to engage visitors of all kind to experience Battir as a place to learn about Palestine in a new and fresh way. Epilogue: History and the Contemporary in Battir When I arrived in the year 2000 with participants of the Intensive Course for Palestinian Guides of Dar Annadwa AdDawliyya to the village of Battir, I was stunned by the beauty of the village at the slope, the spectacular view along the valley including a railway line and the ancient technique of irrigating terraces with water from a strong spring. Actually, I was there to look for ancient historic relics that tell a devastating story of violence when centuries ago the superpower crushed a revolt. At Khirbet al-Yahud the final chapter of a violent revolt against the Empire of Rome took place1. The place, the village and the landscape fascinated me more and more after I understood that something amazing had happened here during the Palestinian catastrophy, an-Nakba, in 1948. I argue here that this story has to be told as a narrative of today.
    [Show full text]