DOCSLIB.ORG

Sigoo~•I Date

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Sigoo~•I Date NPS Form 10-900 (Rev 01 /2009) OM B No. 1024-0018 United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form This form is for use in nominating or requ esting determinations for individual pro pertie s and districts. See instructions in National Reg ister Bulletin, Ho w to Complete the National Register of Historic Places Registration Form. If any item does not apply to the property being documented, enter "NIA" for "not applicable." For functions, architectural classification , materials, and areas of significance, enter on ly categories and subcategories from the instructions. Place additional certification comments, entries, and narrative items on continuation sheets (NPS Form 10-900a). 1. Name of Property Historic name St. Thomas' Episcopal Parish Historic District Other names/site number c._:.::...:...:::...::..:.__:__:,c=....::PG : 86A-~59 ______________________________ _ 2. Location street & number Extending from the east side of Croom Road along the north and south D not for publication sides of St. Thomas Church Road eastward for approximately 1, 500 feet city or town Upper Marlboro ~ vicinity State Mary. ~l_a_nd_____ _ code MD county Prince George's code _0_3_3 _ _ zip code 20772 3. State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act, as amended, I hereby certify that this J nomination _ request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CF;R Part 60. In my opinion, the property_,/_ nmeets __ does not meet the National Register Criteria. I recommend that this property be considered significant at the foll9wing level(s) of significance: _ national _statewide ~local //- 6'- J/ Sigoo~•I Date Title State or Federal agency and bureau In my opinion, the property _meets_ does not meet the National Register criteria. Signature of commenting official Date ITitle State or Federal agency and bureau L___ ____________ St. Thomas' Episcopal Parish Historic District PG : 86A-~59 Prince George's County, Maryland \ Name of Property County and State 4. National Park Service Certification I. hereby, certify that this property is: Signature of the Keeper Date of Action _entered in the National Register _determined eligible for the National Register _determined not eligible for the National Register _ removed from the National Register _other (explain :) 5. Classification Ownership of Property Category of Property Number of Resources within Property (Check as many boxes as apply) (Check only one box) (Do not include previously listed resources in the count.) Contributing Noncontributing private building(s) 4 9 buildings public - Local X district 3 sites public - State site structures public - Federal structure objects X private object 7 10 Total Name of related multiple property listing Number of contributing resources previously (Enter "N/A" if property is not part of a multiple property listing) listed in the National Register N/A 1 (St. Thomas' Episcopal Church) 6. Function or Use Historic Functions Current Functions (Enter categories from instructions) (Enter categories from instructions) RELIGION: Religious Facility; Church-Related Residence RELIGION: Religious Facility FUNERARY: Cemetery FUNERARY: Cemetery DOMESTIC: Single Dwelling DOMESTIC: Single Dwelling EDUCATION: School St. Thomas' Episcopal Parish Historic District PG 86A-~59 Prince George's County, Maryland I Na me of Property Cou nty and State 7. Description Architectural Classification Materials Enter categories from instructions) (Enter categories from instructions) COLONIAL: Georg ian foundation: BRICK; STONE 1 MI0-19 h CENTURY: Gothic Revival walls: BRICK; WOOD: Weatherboard; Shingle roof: WOOD; ASPHALT; METAL other: BRICK (Bell Tower); WOOD (Porch) Narrative Description (Describe the historic and current physical appearance of the property. Explain contributing and noncontributing resources if necessary. Beg in with a summary paragraph that briefly describes the general characteristics of the property, such as its location, setting , size, and significant features.) Summary Paragraph The St. Thomas' Episcopal Parish Historic District includes approximately 43. 77 acres situated in the rural village of Croom in southeastern Prince George's County, Maryland. The district is centered on St. Thomas' Church, erected ca. 1742-1745 as a "Chapel of Ease" for St. Paul's Parish at Baden, Prince George's County, Maryland. In 1850, the church became the parish church for the newly created St. Thomas' Parish, and continues this purpose in 2009. Shortly after the creation of St. Thomas' Parish in 1850, a rectory was built. In 1894, the parishioners of St. Thomas oversaw the construction of St. Simon's Mission Chapel, a chapel for African-American worshippers in St. Thomas' Parish and one of only three African-American Episcopal ongregations in Maryland after the Civil War. St. Simon's Mission continued to serve the African-American communicants of the parish until the congregation merged with that of St. Thomas' Church in 1964. St. Simon's Mission and St. Thomas' Church are associated with the Croom Industrial and Agricultural School, which occupies the southeastern edge of the district. The school was established in 1902, first under the aegis of the Episcopal Church and later as a nonsectarian institution, to teach practical education to African-American children from Prince George's County, other neighboring counties, and Washington, D.C. The school continued until 1952; several buildings remain extant on the former school property, which now functions as a private residence. St. Simon's Mission Chapel was demolished ca. 1974, and an associated cemetery, as well as a historical marker, provides the only physical vestiges of the former church. Narrative Description See Continuation Sheets 7.1 through 7.8. St. Thomas' Episcopal Parish Historic District PG: 86A-°&59 Prince George's County, Maryland Name of Property County and State 8. Statement of Significance Applicable National Register Criteria Areas of Significance Mark "x" in one or more boxes for the criteria qualifying the property (Enter categories from in structions) for Nation al Reg ister listing) SOCIAL HISTORY ----------------- Property is associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of our EDUCATION history. ETHNIC HERITAGE: AFRICAN AMERICAN Property is associated with the lives of persons significant in our past. Property embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, or method of construction or represents the work of a master, or possesses high Period of Significance artistic values, or represents a significant and distinguishable entity whose components lack 1742-1959 individual distinction. Property has yielded , or is likely to yield, information important in prehistory or history. Significant Dates 1742; 1745; 1853; 1859; 1888; 1896; 1903; 1905; 1940 Criteria Considerations (Mark "x" in all the boxes that apply) Significant Person (Complete only if Criterion B is marked above) N/A owed by a religious institution or used for religious X A purposes. Cultural Affiliation B removed from its original location. Unknown C a birthplace or grave. D a cemetery. Architect/Builder Page, Daniel; Builder E a reconstructed building, object, or structure. Priest, John W ; Architect F a commemorative property. Grigg, Milton; Architect G less than 50 years old or achieving significance Tayman, Harry P.; Bu_:.:.ild=-e::..:.r________ _ within the past 50 years. Armstrong, H. and J. ; Builders Period of Significance (justification) The period of significance begins in 1742, with the commencement of construction of St. Thomas' Episcopal Church, and ends in 1959, as St. Simon's Mission Chapel continued to contribute to the growth of Croom throughout the early 1960s, and St. Simon's Cemetery, St. Thomas' Episcopal Church and Cemetery continue into the present day. Therefore, the period of significance extends to the fifty-year age criteria nsideration. St. Thomas' Episcopal Parish Historic District PG : 86A-~59 Prince George's County, Maryland Name of Property • County and State Statement of Significance Summary Paragraph (provide a summary paragraph that includes level of signficance and applicable criteria) St. Thomas' Episcopal Parish Historic District is significant under Criterion A in the area of Social History for its broad impact on the development and history of the rural village of Croom and its significant contribution to the larger African-American community. The district is also significant under Criterion A in the area of Education for its unique efforts in providing practical education to African-American children for the first half of the twentieth century leading up to the eve of school desegregation in Prince George's County. The district is also significant under Criterion C in the area of architecture for its notable examples of the Georgian and Gothic Revival styles of architecture, as well as for its exemplification of a specific type and period of construction. The district meets Criterion Consideration A for religious properties as the district derives its primary significance from its historical importance to the community of Croom(e) and the larger African­ American community as well as from its architectural distinction. Narrative Statement of Significance (provide at least
Load more

Recommended publications
  • AP22 1990.Pdf (16.52Mb)
    ARCHAEOLOGICAL EXCAVATION OF STATE CIRCLE, ANNAPOLIS, MARYLAND by Esther Doyle Read Contributions by Jean Russo George Logan Brett Burk Mark P. Leone, PhD Barbara J. Little, PhD Principal Investigators 30 June 1990 Report prepared for the City of Annapolis by "Archaeology in Annapolis" A cooperative project between The Historic Annapolis Foundation and The University of Maryland, College Park ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Funding for the State Circle Archaeological Project was provided by the City of Annapolis. The State of Maryland provided the City with the bulk of funding for the undergrounding of the utilities and also provided the bulk of the funds for the archaeological component of the project. All of the State funds were administered through the State's Department of General Services. The funds allotted to the City were administered by the City's Department of Public Works. The City of Annapolis, Department of Public Works administered the funds for the archaeological project. Historic Annapolis Foundation administered the funds for the archaeological project under an agreement with the city's Department of Public Works. The University of Maryland, College Park, through its Department of Anthropology, provided all the labor and supervision for the archaeological project. The Maryland Historical Trust, a division of the State's Department of Housing and Community Development facilitated the agreements between the State, the City, and Historic Annapolis k oundation. Numerous individuals contributed to the success of this project. I would like to thank Govenor William Donald Schaffer for his support of the archaeological work done on State Circle. Earl Seboda, Director of the State Department of General Services and Jerry Walls, Chief of the Department of General Services Police, as well as their staffs, were always supportive throughout the project.
    [Show full text]
  • Social Life in the Early Republic: a Machine-Readable Transcription
    Library of Congress Social life in the early republic vii PREFACE peared to them, or recall the quaint figures of Mrs. Alexander Hamilton and Mrs. Madison in old age, or the younger faces of Cora Livingston, Adèle Cutts, Mrs. Gardiner G. Howland, and Madame de Potestad. To those who have aided her with personal recollections or valuable family papers and letters the author makes grateful acknowledgment, her thanks being especially due to Mrs. Samuel Phillips Lee, Mrs. Beverly Kennon, Mrs. M. E. Donelson Wilcox, Miss Virginia Mason, Mr. James Nourse and the Misses Nourse of the Highlands, to Mrs. Robert K. Stone, Miss Fanny Lee Jones, Mrs. Semple, Mrs. Julia F. Snow, Mr. J. Henley Smith, Mrs. Thompson H. Alexander, Miss Rosa Mordecai, Mrs. Harriot Stoddert Turner, Miss Caroline Miller, Mrs. T. Skipwith Coles, Dr. James Dudley Morgan, and Mr. Charles Washington Coleman. A. H. W. Philadelphia, October, 1902. ix CONTENTS Chapter Page I— A Social Evolution 13 II— A Predestined Capital 42 Social life in the early republic http://www.loc.gov/resource/lhbcb.29033 Library of Congress III— Homes and Hostelries 58 IV— County Families 78 V— Jeffersonian Simplicity 102 VI— A Queen of Hearts 131 VII— The Bladensburg Races 161 VII— Peace and Plenty 179 IX— Classics and Cotillions 208 X— A Ladies' Battle 236 XI— Through Several Administrations 267 XII— Mid-Century Gayeties 296 xi ILLUSTRATIONS Page Mrs. Richard Gittings, of Baltimore (Polly Sterett) Frontispiece From portrait by Charles Willson Peale, owned by her great-grandson, Mr. D. Sterett Gittings, of Baltimore. Mrs. Gittings eyes are dark brown, the hair dark brown, with lighter shades through it; the gown of delicate pink, the sleeves caught up with pearls, the sash of a gray shade.
    [Show full text]
  • August 6, 2003, Note: This Description Is Not the One
    Tudor Place Manuscript Collection Martha Washington Papers MS-3 Introduction The Martha Washington Papers consist of correspondence related to General George Washington's death in 1799, a subject file containing letters received by her husband, and letters, legal documents, and bills and receipts related to the settlement of his estate. There is also a subject file containing material relating to the settlement of her estate, which may have come to Tudor Place when Thomas Peter served as an executor of her will. These papers were a part of the estate Armistead Peter placed under the auspices of the Carostead Foundation, Incorporated, in 1966; the name of the foundation was changed to Tudor Place Foundation, Incorporated, in 1987. Use and rights of the papers are controlled by the Foundation. The collection was processed and the register prepared by James Kaser, a project archivist hired through a National Historical Records and Publications grant in 1992. This document was reformatted by Emily Rusch and revised by Tudor Place archivist Wendy Kail in 2020. Tudor Place Historic House & Garden | 1644 31st Street NW | Washington, DC 20007 | Telephone 202-965-0400 | www.tudorplace.org 1 Tudor Place Manuscript Collection Martha Washington Papers MS-3 Biographical Sketch Martha Dandridge (1731-1802) married Daniel Parke Custis (1711-1757), son of John Custis IV, a prominent resident of Williamsburg, Virginia, in 1749. The couple had four children, two of whom survived: John Parke Custis (1754-1781) and Martha Parke Custis (1755/6-1773). Daniel Parke Custis died in 1757; Martha (Dandridge) Custis married General George Washington in 1759and joined him at Mount Vernon, Virginia, with her two children.
    [Show full text]
  • Domestic Management of Woodlawn Plantation: Eleanor Parke Custis Lewis and Her Slaves
    W&M ScholarWorks Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects 1993 Domestic Management of Woodlawn Plantation: Eleanor Parke Custis Lewis and Her Slaves Mary Geraghty College of William & Mary - Arts & Sciences Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wm.edu/etd Part of the African American Studies Commons, African History Commons, and the United States History Commons Recommended Citation Geraghty, Mary, "Domestic Management of Woodlawn Plantation: Eleanor Parke Custis Lewis and Her Slaves" (1993). Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects. Paper 1539625788. https://dx.doi.org/doi:10.21220/s2-jk5k-gf34 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects at W&M ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects by an authorized administrator of W&M ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. DOMESTIC MANAGEMENT OF WOODLAWN PLANTATION: ELEANOR PARKE CUSTIS LEWIS AND HER SLAVES A Thesis Presented to The Faculty of the Department of American Studies The College of William and Mary in Virginia In Partial Fulfillment Of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts by Mary Geraghty 1993 APPROVAL SHEET This thesis is submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts -Ln 'ln ixi ;y&Ya.4iistnh A uthor Approved, December 1993 irk. a Bar hiara Carson Vanessa Patrick Colonial Williamsburg /? Jafhes Whittenburg / Department of
    [Show full text]
  • Lee Mansion NATIONAL MEMORIAL
    Lee Mansion NATIONAL MEMORIAL Arlington National Cemete ry VIRGINIA by a wide central hall. A large formal Mount Vernon. The view from the por­ seven Lee children were born here. By drawing room with two fine marble fire­ tico he pronounced unrivaled, entreating the will of George Washington Parke Cus­ places lies south of this hall, while to the Mrs. Custis never to sacrifice any of the tis, who died in 1857, the estate of Arling­ north of it can be seen the family dining fine trees. General Lafayette returned ton was bequeathed to his daughter for Lee Mansion National Memorial room and family parlor separated by a again to Arlington House in 1825 as the her lifetime, and afterward to his eldest north and south partition broken by three guest of the Custises for several weeks. grandson and namesake, George Washing­ graceful arches. The second story is also ton Custis Lee. divided by a central hall on either side of Lt. Robert E. Lee's Marriage Never a thrifty farmer and an easygoing In this Mansion, which became his home when he married Mary which there are two bedrooms and accom­ Custis, Robert E. Lee wrote his resignation from the United States master, requiring little of his slaves, Mr. panying dressing rooms. A small room On June 30, 1831, Mary Ann Randolph Army in April 1861, to join the cause of Virginia and the South. Custis' death found the Arlington planta­ Custis, only child of the Custis family at used as a linen closet is at the end of this tion sadly run down.
    [Show full text]
  • Rehabilitation of Arlington House, the Robert E. Lee Memorial South
    Rehabilitation of Arlington House, the Robert E. Lee Memorial South Dependency/Slave Quarters - Discovery of a Subfloor Storage Pit Shrine Supplementary Section 106 Archeological Investigations Related to the 2017-2020 Rehabilitation Program George Washington Memorial Parkway Arlington House, the Robert E. Lee Memorial Arlington County, Virginia Matthew R. Virta, Cultural Resources Program Manager National Park Service - George Washington Memorial Parkway 2021 Cover Graphics (clockwise from upper left): Fireplace and Subfloor Pit Location, South Dependency West Room Slave Quarters, Arlington House, The Robert E. Lee Memorial – NPS Photograph by B. Krueger 2019 adapted by M. Virta, National Park Service-George Washington Memorial Parkway Drawing of Previous Archeological Excavations Showing Fireplace and Subfloor Pit Excavation Unit Illustrating Positioning of Bottles Discovered, South Dependency West Room Slave Quarters, Arlington House, The Robert E. Lee Memorial – NPS Drawing by M. Virta 2020, National Park Service-George Washington Memorial Parkway, based on Louis Berger Group, Inc. drawing and B. Krueger illustration Selina and Thornton Gray – from National Park Service Museum Management Program Exhibit, https://www.nps.gov/museum/exhibits/arho/index.html Elevation Drawings of South Dependency/Slave Quarters, Arlington House, The Robert E. Lee Memorial – National Park Service Historic American Building Survey Collections HABS VA 443A; https://www.loc.gov/item/va1924/. Rehabilitation of Arlington House, the Robert E. Lee Memorial South Dependency/Slave Quarters - Discovery of a Subfloor Storage Pit Shrine Supplementary Section 106 Archeological Investigations Related to the 2017-2020 Rehabilitation Program Virginia Department of Historic Resources File # 2015-1056 Archeological Site # 44AR0017 George Washington Memorial Parkway Arlington House, the Robert E.
    [Show full text]
  • The Calvert Papers
    fW'-'. '.Ar # i^^ .«»^ :^A , ^ta/vL2?e.nze^rit^ of j/ieJu'i^ntffonoiurwtc Ccvcilius Couw/'t ^Kinatu?7ne ofT^viand ^o/o/utc Lofxl and Jrapttetafyoft/Pt-cmnceKf ofjia/yiana ojuf^/ivalen in ^-^nterica II<»ii f, Co. Li<h . Buhl THE CALVERT PAPERS. NUMBER ONE. 3fun&-1Pub(tcatvo«, ^o. 38. THE CALVERT PAPERS NUMBER ONE With an account of their recovery, and presentation to the Society, Deceniljer lotti, 1888. Together with a Calendar of the Papers recovered, and Selections from the Papers. JaHiiiiora, 1889. rEA]]ODY rUBLICATIOX FUXD. Committee on Publicatiox. 1888-89. HENRY STOCKBRIDGE, JOHN W. M. LEE, BRADLEY T. JOHNSON. Printed b v John M i k p u v X Co. I'H INTERS TO THE MARYLAND HISTORICAL SOCIETY. Baltimore, I S S !( ^-,cr\ CONTENTS PAGE. - Address of Mr. Albert Ritchje, - - - - t 9 Remarks of Mr. John H. B. Latrobe, 22 Report of Mr. Mendes Cohen, 22 Remarks of Dr. William Hand Browne, . - - 32 Exemplification of the Arms of Sir George Calvert, - - 38 The Patent of Nobility of George, Lord Baltimore, - 41 The Will of Sir George Calvert, Lord Baltimore, - - 48 The Inventory of the Estate of the same, - - - - 50 Tender by Cecilivs, Lord Baltimore, of the first year's Rent, 54 Receipt for the first year's rent, 54 A Calendar of the Calvert Papers, by Mr. John W. .^L Lee, 57 The Calvert Papers. First Selection, 127 PREFACE. At a meeting of the Maryland Historical Society, at their rooms, on December 10, 1888, the Calvert Papers were for- mally presented to the Society.
    [Show full text]
  • A Catalogue of the Collection of American Paintings in the Corcoran Gallery of Art
    A Catalogue of the Collection of American Paintings in The Corcoran Gallery of Art VOLUME I THE CORCORAN GALLERY OF ART WASHINGTON, D.C. A Catalogue of the Collection of American Paintings in The Corcoran Gallery of Art Volume 1 PAINTERS BORN BEFORE 1850 THE CORCORAN GALLERY OF ART WASHINGTON, D.C Copyright © 1966 By The Corcoran Gallery of Art, Washington, D.C. 20006 The Board of Trustees of The Corcoran Gallery of Art George E. Hamilton, Jr., President Robert V. Fleming Charles C. Glover, Jr. Corcoran Thorn, Jr. Katherine Morris Hall Frederick M. Bradley David E. Finley Gordon Gray David Lloyd Kreeger William Wilson Corcoran 69.1 A cknowledgments While the need for a catalogue of the collection has been apparent for some time, the preparation of this publication did not actually begin until June, 1965. Since that time a great many individuals and institutions have assisted in com- pleting the information contained herein. It is impossible to mention each indi- vidual and institution who has contributed to this project. But we take particular pleasure in recording our indebtedness to the staffs of the following institutions for their invaluable assistance: The Frick Art Reference Library, The District of Columbia Public Library, The Library of the National Gallery of Art, The Prints and Photographs Division, The Library of Congress. For assistance with particular research problems, and in compiling biographi- cal information on many of the artists included in this volume, special thanks are due to Mrs. Philip W. Amram, Miss Nancy Berman, Mrs. Christopher Bever, Mrs. Carter Burns, Professor Francis W.
    [Show full text]
  • Maryland Historical Magazine, 1950, Volume 45, Issue No. 4
    MARYLAND HISTORICAL MAGAZINE Riversdale — Entrance Front Prince George's County MARYLAND HISTORICAL SOCIETY BALTIMORE December • 1950 • 4.4. ±4.4.4.4,4.4.4.4. ±4.4.4.4.4.4.4.4.4.4.4.4.4.4.4.4,4.4.4.4.4. J.4.4.4.4.XXJ*.J.J>.J.J.J.J..t.J.J.J.. FOR SALE BY THE SOCIETY Maryland in World War II, Vol. I: Military, by H. R. Manakee. 1950 384 pp. cloth. (Maryland Sales Tax 6c.) $3.25 History of Queen Anne's County, by Frederick Emory. 1886-7. Reprinted 1949. 629 pages, cloth cover. By mail, Maryland sales tax included $7.75 Portraits Painted before 1900 in the Collection of the Maryland His- torical Society, by Anna Wells Rutledge. 1946. 40 pages, illus- trated, paper covers $1.00 Handlist of Miniatures in the Collections of the Maryland Historical Society, by Anna Wells Rutledge. 1945. 18 pages, illustrated, paper covers .60 Augustine Herman's Map of Virginia and Maryland, 1673. Reproduced from original in John Carter Brown Library 6.50 Warner and Hanna's Map of Baltimore, 1801, Collotype reproduction in color 5.00 Old Wye Church, Talbot Co., Md. A History of St. Luke's at Wye Mills, by Elizabeth Merritt. 1949. 42 pages, paper covers .55 Calendar of the General Otho Holland Williams Papers in the Maryland Historical Society. 1940. 454 pages, mimeographed, paper covers. 2.75 Chronicles of Mistress Margaret Brent, by Mary E. W. Ramey. 1915. 12 pages, illustrated, paper covers 1.00 Descendants of Richard and Elizabeth Ewen Talbot of Poplar Knowle, West River, Anne Arundel Co., compiled by Ida Morrison Shirk.
    [Show full text]
  • By Eleanor Lee Templeman Reprinted from the Booklet Prepared for the Visit of the Virginia State Legislators to Northern Virginia, January 1981
    THE HERITAGE OF NORTHERN VIRGINIA By Eleanor Lee Templeman Reprinted from the booklet prepared for the visit of the Virginia State Legislators to Northern Virginia, January 1981. The documented history of Northern Virginia goes back to John Smith's written description of his exploration of the Potomac in 1608 that took him to Little Falls, the head of Tidewater at the upper boundary of Arlington Coun­ ty. Successive charters issued to the Virginia Company in 1609 and 1612 granted jurisdiction over all territory lying 200 miles north and south of Point Comfort, "all that space and circuit of land lying from the seacoast of the precinct aforesaid, up into the land throughout from sea to sea, west and northwest." The third charter of 1612 included Bermuda. The first limitations upon the extent of the "Kingdom of Virginia," as it was referred to by King Charles I, came in 1632 when he granted Lord Baltimore a proprietorship over the part that became Maryland. The northeastern portion of Virginia included one of America's greatest land grants, the Northern Neck Proprietary of approximately six million acres. In 1649, King Charles II, a refugee in France because of the English Civil War, granted to seven loyal followers all the land between the Potomac and Rap­ pahannock Rivers. (Although the term, "Northern Neck" is usually applied to . that portion south of Fredericksburg, the largest portion is in Northern Virginia.) Charles II, then in command of the British Navy, was about to launch an attack to recover the English throne. His power, however, was nullified by Cromwell's decisive victory at Worcester in 1650.
    [Show full text]
  • Remembering the Revolution: Memory, History, and Nation-Making
    n today’s United States, the legacy of the American Revolution looms large. From presidential speeches to bestselling biographies, from conservative politics to school pageants, everybody knows something about the Revolution. Yet what was a messy, protracted, = divisive, and destructive war has calcified into a t the Iglorified founding moment of the American nation. h e g Disparate events with equally diverse participants Revolution have been reduced to a few key scenes and characters, RememberinMemory, History, and Nation Making from Independence to the Civil War presided over by well-meaning and wise old men. In this lively collection of essays, historians and literary scholars consider how the first three generations of American citizens interpreted their = nation’s origins. They show how the memory of the Revolution became politicized early in the nation’s EditEd by history, as different interests sought to harness its Michael A. McDonnell meaning for their own ends. No single faction succeeded, and at the outbreak of the Civil War the Clare Corbould American people remained divided over how to Frances M. Clarke remember the Revolution. and MIChAel A. MCDoNNell is associate professor W. Fitzhugh Brundage of history at the University of Sydney. ClARe CoRBoUlD is Australian Research Council Future Fellow at Monash University, Melbourne. FRANCeS M. ClARke is senior lecturer at the University of Sydney. W. FITzhUgh BRUNDAge is professor of history at the University of North Carolina, Chapel hill. a volume in the series Public history in historical Perspective Cover design by Sally Nichols Cover painting by emanuel leutze, Washington Crossing the Delaware, oil on canvas, 1851, 149 x 255 in.
    [Show full text]
  • Washington and Yorba
    GENEALOGY OF THE WASHINGTON AND YORBA AND RELATED FAMILIES OUN1Y C/'.\Llf ORNIP ORA~\G~ . COG .' \CJ.\L SOC\E1)' GtNtJ\L Washington and Related Families - Washington Family Chart I M- Amphillus Twigden 6 Lawrence Washington 001-5. Thomas Washington, b. c. 1605, Margaret (Butler) Washington d. in Spain while a page to Prince Charles (later King Charles II) 1623. 001-1. Robert Washington, b. c. 1589, Unmd. eldest son and heir, d.s.p. 1610 Chart II 001-2. Sir John Washington of Thrapston, d. May 18, 1688. 1 Lawrence Washington M- 1st - Mary Curtis, d. Jan. 1, 1624 or Amphillus (Twigden) Washington 2 25, and bur. at Islip Ch. • M- 2nd - Dorothy Pargiter, d. Oct. 15, 002-1. John Washington, b. in Eng. 1678. 3 1632 or 1633, and emg. to VA c. 1659. He was b. at Warton Co. Lancaster, Eng. 001-3. Sir William Washington of He settled at Bridge's Creek, VA, and d. Packington, b. c. 1594, bur. Jun. 22, Jan. 1677. 1643, St. Martin's m the Field, M- 1st - Anne Pope, dtr of Nathaniel Middlesex Pope of Pope's Creek, VA. M- Anne Villiers 4 M- 2nd - Anne Brett M- 3rd - Ann Gerrard M- 4th - Frances Gerrard Speke Peyton 001-4. Lawrence Washington 5 Appleton 7 1 He was knighted at Newmarkel, Feb. 2 1, 1622 or 23. He 002-2. Lawrence Washington, bap. at and other members of his family often visited Althorpe, the Tring, Co. Hertfordshire, Jun. 18, 1635, home of the Spencers. He is buried in the Parish Ch.
    [Show full text]