Maryland Historical Magazine, 1950, Volume 45, Issue No. 4
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Journal Part a 2020
The Episcopal Diocese of Maryland Convention Journal Part A – Information & Reports For the 236th Annual Convention September 12, 2020 (rescheduled due to COVID-19 pandemic) 1 236th Annual Convention of the Episcopal Diocese of Maryland Contents Schedule………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….3 Diocesan Staff………………………………………………………………………………………………………….4 Churches by Region…………………………………………………………………………………………………7 Indexes of Parishes, Congregations, and Missions……………………………………………………..8 Other Agencies, Institutions and Organizations……………………………………………………….13 Ecumenical Ministries……………………………………………………………………………………………14. Church Schools………………………………………………………………………………………………………14 Individuals in the Formation Process……………………………………………………………………...16 Reports Episcopal Acts…………………………………………………………………………………………..…17 Other Reports (alphabetical)………………………………………………………………………..22 Minutes from 2019 Convention……………………………………………..……………………………….33 Tables and Lists Canonical List of Clergy as of May 2019 convention……………………..……………….52 Clergy Who Have Died Since the Last Convention.………………………………………...60 Bishops of Maryland…………………………………………………………………………………....60 Lay Delegates and Alternates to 2019 Convention……………..………………………....62 Youth Delegates and Alternates to 2019 Convention…………………………………….65 Nominations—see Journal Part B Appointments Nominees Rules of Order Balloting Instructions Sample Ballot Sheet Resolutions—see Journal Part B Statistics—see website Convention page Allocations Financial Membership 2 236th Annual Convention of the Episcopal Diocese of Maryland Schedule -
Near East Relief Historical Society
70th Congress, I tit Session - Senate Document No. 70 NEAR EAST RELIEF REPORT OF THE NEAR EAST RELIEF FOR THE YEAR ENDING DECEMBER 31, 1927 MARCH 14, 1928.-Ordered to be printed, with illustrations UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE WASHINGTON' 1928 LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL MARCH 13, 1928. Phe PEPS1DENT OF THE SENATE ACED THE SPEAKER OF ThE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES OF THE UNITED STATES. Sins: In accordance with the act of incorporation of Near East Relief, approved by the President August 6, 1919, we submit here- with report for the year ending December 31, 1927, in the form of: 1. Report of the executive committee to the board of trustees for the calendar year 1927, as presented at the annual meeting of the board of trustees January 4, 1928. 2. Report of the treasurer for the calendar year 1927. 3. Report of the general secretary for 1927 as submitted at the annual meeting of the board of trustees January 4, 1928. 4. Officers and members of the board of trustees, executive and ot0 cI. committees. 5. List of the National Infolden Rtule C('nommittee. 6. List, of national cooperating alnd ldlvisory committees. 7. List of State chairmen, treasurers, antd offices. Oil behalf of the executive committee, Respectfully suibnmitted. C1IJARL1S V. VICKREY, General Secretary. -II ORGANIZATION AND ADMINISTRATION IN THE UNITED STATES The following persons, named by Congress in the act of iincorpo- ration or later duly elected, are members and officers of the board of trustees, executive and other committees: MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES James L. Barton, Boston, Mass. -
AP22 1990.Pdf (16.52Mb)
ARCHAEOLOGICAL EXCAVATION OF STATE CIRCLE, ANNAPOLIS, MARYLAND by Esther Doyle Read Contributions by Jean Russo George Logan Brett Burk Mark P. Leone, PhD Barbara J. Little, PhD Principal Investigators 30 June 1990 Report prepared for the City of Annapolis by "Archaeology in Annapolis" A cooperative project between The Historic Annapolis Foundation and The University of Maryland, College Park ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Funding for the State Circle Archaeological Project was provided by the City of Annapolis. The State of Maryland provided the City with the bulk of funding for the undergrounding of the utilities and also provided the bulk of the funds for the archaeological component of the project. All of the State funds were administered through the State's Department of General Services. The funds allotted to the City were administered by the City's Department of Public Works. The City of Annapolis, Department of Public Works administered the funds for the archaeological project. Historic Annapolis Foundation administered the funds for the archaeological project under an agreement with the city's Department of Public Works. The University of Maryland, College Park, through its Department of Anthropology, provided all the labor and supervision for the archaeological project. The Maryland Historical Trust, a division of the State's Department of Housing and Community Development facilitated the agreements between the State, the City, and Historic Annapolis k oundation. Numerous individuals contributed to the success of this project. I would like to thank Govenor William Donald Schaffer for his support of the archaeological work done on State Circle. Earl Seboda, Director of the State Department of General Services and Jerry Walls, Chief of the Department of General Services Police, as well as their staffs, were always supportive throughout the project. -
'Deprived of Their Liberty'
'DEPRIVED OF THEIR LIBERTY': ENEMY PRISONERS AND THE CULTURE OF WAR IN REVOLUTIONARY AMERICA, 1775-1783 by Trenton Cole Jones A dissertation submitted to Johns Hopkins University in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Baltimore, Maryland June, 2014 © 2014 Trenton Cole Jones All Rights Reserved Abstract Deprived of Their Liberty explores Americans' changing conceptions of legitimate wartime violence by analyzing how the revolutionaries treated their captured enemies, and by asking what their treatment can tell us about the American Revolution more broadly. I suggest that at the commencement of conflict, the revolutionary leadership sought to contain the violence of war according to the prevailing customs of warfare in Europe. These rules of war—or to phrase it differently, the cultural norms of war— emphasized restricting the violence of war to the battlefield and treating enemy prisoners humanely. Only six years later, however, captured British soldiers and seamen, as well as civilian loyalists, languished on board noisome prison ships in Massachusetts and New York, in the lead mines of Connecticut, the jails of Pennsylvania, and the camps of Virginia and Maryland, where they were deprived of their liberty and often their lives by the very government purporting to defend those inalienable rights. My dissertation explores this curious, and heretofore largely unrecognized, transformation in the revolutionaries' conduct of war by looking at the experience of captivity in American hands. Throughout the dissertation, I suggest three principal factors to account for the escalation of violence during the war. From the onset of hostilities, the revolutionaries encountered an obstinate enemy that denied them the status of legitimate combatants, labeling them as rebels and traitors. -
The Magazine
The Magazine Williamsburg Chapter Virginia Society Sons of the American Revolution By signing the Declaration of Independence, the fifty-six Americans pledged their lives, fortunes, and sacred honor. Nine died of wounds during the Revolutionary War, Five were captured or imprisoned. Wives and children were jailed, mistreated, or left penniless. Twelve signers’ houses were burned to the ground. No signer defected. Their honor, like their nation remained intact. Vol. XX President’s Message At our October meeting we were treated to a very Do not miss our chapter’s signature interesting presentation by Peggy Bellows, Editor ceremony on Veterans Day. A great and of the Virginia Gazette, on Gazette publication expanded event has been prepared by Tom during the Revolutionary War. There were no Campbell. It will include Colors, Fife and reporters, no photos and no ads in those days. Drum, National Anthems, Procession of Material consisted mainly of letters sent in to Revolutionary War Flags, a Speaker, Bag them and a big problem was shortage of paper. Piper, Wreath Laying, and a Bugler. We will She then went on to discuss the Gazette’s gather at 11 AM on Nov. 11th for the cemetery transition into the digital-age “revolution.” behind the Governor’s Palace in Colonial Williamsburg. After the ceremony we will th Yorktown Victory Day on Oct. 19 began with move to the Fort Magruder Hotel for a the usual wreath laying at the tomb of Thomas luncheon meeting. The meeting will feature Nelson, Jr. Six SAR state societies, 14 Virginia election of 2017 officers and board members. -
University of Oklahoma Libraries Western History Collections Ralph
University of Oklahoma Libraries Western History Collections Ralph H. Records Collection Records, Ralph Hayden. Papers, 1871–1968. 2 feet. Professor. Magazine and journal articles (1946–1968) regarding historiography, along with a typewritten manuscript (1871–1899) by L. S. Records, entitled “The Recollections of a Cowboy of the Seventies and Eighties,” regarding the lives of cowboys and ranchers in frontier-era Kansas and in the Cherokee Strip of Oklahoma Territory, including a detailed account of Records’s participation in the land run of 1893. ___________________ Box 1 Folder 1: Beyond The American Revolutionary War, articles and excerpts from the following: Wilbur C. Abbott, Charles Francis Adams, Randolph Greenfields Adams, Charles M. Andrews, T. Jefferson Coolidge, Jr., Thomas Anburey, Clarence Walroth Alvord, C.E. Ayres, Robert E. Brown, Fred C. Bruhns, Charles A. Beard and Mary R. Beard, Benjamin Franklin, Carl Lotus Belcher, Henry Belcher, Adolph B. Benson, S.L. Blake, Charles Knowles Bolton, Catherine Drinker Bowen, Julian P. Boyd, Carl and Jessica Bridenbaugh, Sanborn C. Brown, William Hand Browne, Jane Bryce, Edmund C. Burnett, Alice M. Baldwin, Viola F. Barnes, Jacques Barzun, Carl Lotus Becker, Ruth Benedict, Charles Borgeaud, Crane Brinton, Roger Butterfield, Edwin L. Bynner, Carl Bridenbaugh Folder 2: Douglas Campbell, A.F. Pollard, G.G. Coulton, Clarence Edwin Carter, Harry J. Armen and Rexford G. Tugwell, Edward S. Corwin, R. Coupland, Earl of Cromer, Harr Alonzo Cushing, Marquis De Shastelluz, Zechariah Chafee, Jr. Mellen Chamberlain, Dora Mae Clark, Felix S. Cohen, Verner W. Crane, Thomas Carlyle, Thomas Cromwell, Arthur yon Cross, Nellis M. Crouso, Russell Davenport Wallace Evan Daview, Katherine B. -
Maryland Historical Magazine, 1946, Volume 41, Issue No. 4
MHRYMnD CWAQAZIU^j MARYLAND HISTORICAL SOCIETY BALTIMORE DECEMBER • 1946 t. IN 1900 Hutzler Brothers Co. annexed the building at 210 N. Howard Street. Most of the additional space was used for the expansion of existing de- partments, but a new shoe shop was installed on the third floor. It is interesting to note that the shoe department has now returned to its original location ... in a greatly expanded form. HUTZLER BPOTHERSe N\S/Vsc5S8M-lW MARYLAND HISTORICAL MAGAZINE A Quarterly Volume XLI DECEMBER, 1946 Number 4 BALTIMORE AND THE CRISIS OF 1861 Introduction by CHARLES MCHENRY HOWARD » HE following letters, copies of letters, and other documents are from the papers of General Isaac Ridgeway Trimble (b. 1805, d. 1888). They are confined to a brief period of great excitement in Baltimore, viz, after the riot of April 19, 1861, when Federal troops were attacked by the mob while being marched through the City streets, up to May 13th of that year, when General Butler, with a large body of troops occupied Federal Hill, after which Baltimore was substantially under control of the 1 Some months before his death in 1942 the late Charles McHenry Howard (a grandson of Charles Howard, president of the Board of Police in 1861) placed the papers here printed in the Editor's hands for examination, and offered to write an introduction if the Committee on Publications found them acceptable for the Magazine. Owing to the extraordinary events related and the revelation of an episode unknown in Baltimore history, Mr. Howard's proposal was promptly accepted. -
Perpetuating the Architecture of Separation: an Analysis of the Presentation of History and the Past at the Riversdale House Museum in Riverdale Park, Maryland
Field Notes: A Journal of Collegiate Anthropology Volume 10 Article 15 2019 Perpetuating the Architecture of Separation: An Analysis of the Presentation of History and the Past at the Riversdale House Museum in Riverdale Park, Maryland Ann S. Eberwein University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Follow this and additional works at: https://dc.uwm.edu/fieldnotes Recommended Citation Eberwein, Ann S. (2019) "Perpetuating the Architecture of Separation: An Analysis of the Presentation of History and the Past at the Riversdale House Museum in Riverdale Park, Maryland," Field Notes: A Journal of Collegiate Anthropology: Vol. 10 , Article 15. Available at: https://dc.uwm.edu/fieldnotes/vol10/iss1/15 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by UWM Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Field Notes: A Journal of Collegiate Anthropology by an authorized administrator of UWM Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Perpetuating the Architecture of Separation: An Analysis of the Presentation of History at Riversdale House Museum in Riverdale Park, Maryland Ann S. Eberwein University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, USA Abstract: Riversdale House Museum is one of many historic houses in the United States with difficult histories, which curators avoid rather than confront. This evasive tactic goes against recent developments in museological method and theory that advocate for social justice as one of a museum’s primary goals. Exhibits at Riversdale focus on architectural restoration and avoid an overt discussion of many aspects of history unrelated to aesthetics. The presentation of history at this site, in the context of a diverse com- munity, is also at odds with recently developed interpretation methods at historic houses that emphasize connection with a mu- seum’s community and audience. -
Adams and Jefferson : Personal Politics in the Early Republic
d ADAMS AND JEFFERSON: Personal Politics in the Early Republic John Connor The deterioration of the friendship between John Adams and Thomas Jefferson remains a controversial subject among his torians. The two men were once the best of friends, spending personal time with each other’s family, and enjoying a profes sional collaboration that would become famous—drafting the Declaration of Independence. Furthermore, they freely ac knowledged their mutual fondness. In 1784, Adams wrote that his colleague Thomas Jefferson was “an old friend with whom I have often had occasion to labor at many a knotty problem and in whose ability and steadiness I always found great cause to confide.”1 Jefferson wrote similar words of praise to his friend James Madison: “[Adams] is profound in his views, and accurate in his judgments. He is so amiable, that I pronounce you will love him if ever you become acquainted with him.”2 But despite this initial close friendship, by the 1790s Adams called Jefferson “weak, confused, uninformed, and ignorant.”3 At the same time, Jefferson called Adams actions as President “the most grotesque scene in the tragiccomedy of govern ment.”4 What led these two men who once worked so closely together to turn from close friends to bitter enemies in only ten years? How their friendship dissolved has been discussed by Stephen Kurtz, Stanley Elkins, and Eric McKitrick, who em 58 phasize certain events in the Adams Presidency as precise mo ments in which the two men parted ways.5 Noble Cunningham Jr., points to the passage of the Alien and Sedition Act and the creation of a Standing Army as the point at which the two men’s differences became irreconcilable.6 Recent scholarship by James Sharp argues that a dinner conversation held before Adams was even elected led to their disbanding.7 A second school of thought, led by Merrill Peterson, Dumas Malone, and John Ferling, links the divide not so much to a particular event but to the actions of a third party, often Alexander Hamilton. -
The Episcopal Diocese of Maryland Convention Journal
The Episcopal Diocese of Maryland Convention Journal Part A – Information & Reports For the 235th Annual Convention May 10-11, 2019 1 235th Annual Convention of the Episcopal Diocese of Maryland Contents Schedule………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….3 Map—Turf Valley Resort………………………………………………………………………………………….6 Diocesan Staff………………………………………………………………………………………………………….7 Churches by Region………………………………………………………………………………………………..10 Indexes of Parishes, Congregations, and Missions…………………………………………………….11 Other Agencies, Institutions and Organizations………………………………………………………..16 Ecumenical Ministries…………………………………………………………………………………………….17 Church Schools………………………………………………………………………………………………………17 Individuals in the Formation Process………………………………………………………………………19 Reports Episcopal Acts…………………………………………………………………………………………….20 Other Reports (alphabetical)……………………………………………………………………….24 Confirm Constitutional Amendments of General Convention 2018………………..42 Minutes from 2018 Convention………………………………………………………………..……………..47 Tables and Lists Canonical List of Clergy as of May 2018 convention……………………..……………….69 Clergy Who Have Died Since the Last Convention.………………………………………...77 Bishops of Maryland…………………………………………………………………………………....77 Lay Delegates and Alternates to 2018 Convention……………..………………………....79 Youth Delegates and Alternates to 2018 Convention…………………………………….82 Nominations—see Journal Part B Appointments Nominees Rules of Order Balloting Instructions Sample Ballot Sheet Resolutions—see Journal Part B Statistics—see website Convention page Allocations Financial -
Attendees at George Washington's Resignation of His Commission Old Senate Chamber, Maryland State House, December 23
Attendees at George Washington’s Resignation of his Commission Old Senate Chamber, Maryland State House, December 23, 1783 Compiled by the Maryland State Archives, February 2009 Known attendees: George Washington Thomas Mifflin, President of the Congress Charles Thomson, Secretary of the Congress Other known attendees: Members of the Governor and Council of Maryland. Specific members are not identified; full membership listed below Members of the government of the City of Annapolis. Specific members are not identified; full membership listed below Henry Harford, former Proprietor of Maryland Sir Robert Eden, former governor Those who attended who wrote about the ceremony in some detail: Dr. James McHenry, Congressman and former aide to Washington Mollie Ridout Dr. James Tilton, Congressman There was a “gallery full of ladies” (per Mollie Ridout), most of whom are unknown Members of the Maryland General Assembly The General Assembly was in Session on December 23, and both houses convened in the State House on December 22 and on December 23. It is difficult to identify specific individuals who were in the Senate Chamber GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF 1783 William Paca, governor November 3-December 26, 1783 SENATE WESTERN James McHenry EASTERN Edward Lloyd SHORE SHORE George Plater Daniel Carroll, Matthew John Cadwalader (E, president ' Tilghman Dcl) Thomas Stone Richard Barnes ' (DNS, R) Robert Goldsborough (DNS) (E, Charles Carroll of Benedict Edward Hall John Henry DNS) Carrollton, Samuel Hughes William Hindman William Perry (E) president ' John Smith Josiah Polk (DNS) HOUSE OF DELEGATES ST MARY'S John Dent, of John CECIL Nathan Hammond William Somerville BALTIMORE Archibald Job Thomas Ogle John DeButts Thomas Cockey Deye, Samuel Miller HARFORD Edmund Plowden speaker William Rowland Benjamin Bradford Norris Philip Key Charles Ridgely, of Benjamin Brevard John Love William KENT John Stevenson ANNAPOLIS John Taylor (DNS) Peregrine Lethrbury Charles Ridgely Allen Quynn Ignatius Wheeler, Jr. -
Female Education in the Late Sixteenth and Early Seventeenth Centuries in England and Wales: a Study of Attitudes and Practi Ce
FEMALE EDUCATION IN THE LATE SIXTEENTH AND EARLY SEVENTEENTH CENTURIES IN ENGLAND AND WALES: A STUDY OF ATTITUDES AND PRACTI CE Thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy: January 1996 Caroline Mary Kynaston Bowden Institute of Education, University of London \ 2 ABSTRACT OF THESIS This thesis provides a study of attitudes and practice in respect of female education in England and Wales in the late sixteenth and early seventeenth centuries. It begins with a review of primary and secondary sources, and throughout draws substantially upon personal documents consulted in collections of family papers covering a wide geographical area. These documents, it is argued are broadly representative of gentry families. Chapter Two examines the education of daughters; Chapter Three the role of women in marriage; Chapter Four motherhood. Each of these chapters examines the links between education and the roles girls and women fulfilled. Throughout these three chapters, contrasts and comparisons are drawn between prescriptive advice and practice. Chapter Five considers the difficult issue of standards in the education of girls and women, while the final chapter examines some of the outcomes of education in terms of women as intermediaries in informal power networks, estate and farm managers and educational benefactors and founders. The thesis draws conclusions in respect of the importance of education in permitting the developing role of women in both private and public spheres and examines the reasons for such changes. It also challenges existing theories regarding the differences between Catholic and Protestant attitudes to girls' education. A substantial appendix listing some 870 educated and literate women of the period is provided, both to demonstrate the major sources for this study and to provide a basis for future research.