DOCSLIB.ORG

Port Tobacco River Watershed Assessment Summary

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Port Tobacco River Watershed Assessment Summary GILBERT SWAMP WATERSHED ASSESSMENT MAY | 2018 PREPARED FOR Charles County Department of Planning and Growth Management Watershed Protection and Restoration Program 200 Baltimore St., La Plata, MD 20646 PREPARED BY KCI TECHNOLOGIES, INC. 936 RIDGEBROOK ROAD SPARKS, MD 21152 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The Gilbert Swamp Watershed Assessment was a collaborative effort between Coastal Resources, Inc., KCI Technologies, Inc. and Charles County Department of Planning and Growth Management (PGM). The resulting report was authored by the following individuals from KCI Technologies, Inc. and Charles County. Susanna Brellis | KCI Technologies, Inc. Yinting Hou | KCI Technologies, Inc. Robert Owen | KCI Technologies, Inc. Michael Pieper | KCI Technologies, Inc. James Tomlinson | KCI Technologies, Inc. Erica Hahn | Charles County Dept. of PGM Charles Rice | Charles County Dept. of PGM Karen Wiggen | Charles County Dept. of PGM For more information pertaining to the Restoration Plan, please contact: Karen Wiggen, Planner Charles County Government Department of Planning and Growth Management 200 Baltimore St. La Plata, MD 20646 301-645-0683 [email protected] And visit us on the web: www.charlescountymd.gov/watershed Gilbert Swamp Watershed Assessment TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 Introduction ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 7 1.1 Background ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 7 1.2 Watershed description --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 7 1.3 Previous Watershed Studies and Assessments ------------------------------------------------------- 10 1.4 Goals -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 10 1.4.1 Watershed Assessments ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------10 1.4.2 Impervious Restoration -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------11 1.4.3 TMDLs ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------11 2 Watershed Assessment Methods --------------------------------------------------------------------- 12 2.1 Upland Assessment ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 13 2.1.1 Neighborhood Source Assessment---------------------------------------------------------------------------------13 2.1.2 Hotspot Site Investigations ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------13 2.2 Nutrient Synoptic Survey ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 14 2.2.1 Water Quality Sampling ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------14 2.2.2 Stream Discharge Measurement -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------15 2.3 Stream Corridor Assessment ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 15 3 Watershed Assessment Results ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 18 3.1 Upland Assessment ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 18 3.1.1 Neighborhood Source Assessment---------------------------------------------------------------------------------18 3.1.2 Hotspot Site Investigations ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------20 3.2 Synoptic Water Quality Survey ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- 23 3.2.1 Stream Discharge -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------23 3.2.2 Water Quality -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------23 3.3 Stream Corridor Assessment ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 33 4 Potential Water Quality Improvement Projects -------------------------------------------------- 44 4.1 Stream Restoration ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 46 4.2 Shoreline Erosion Control ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 48 4.3 Stormwater BMPs -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 48 4.3.1 Watershed Assessment Stormwater BMP Analysis ------------------------------------------------------------48 4.4 Reforestation --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 54 5 Programmatic Practices --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 55 5.1 Trash Clean-Ups ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 55 3 Gilbert Swamp Watershed Assessment 5.2 Homeowner Practices --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 56 5.3 Septic Practices ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 60 6 Treatment Summary ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 62 6.1 Existing BMPs – Actual Implementation --------------------------------------------------------------- 62 6.2 Planned Implementation ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 63 6.3 Impervious Credit -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 64 6.4 Local TMDL and Bay TMDL Baseline and Target Loads --------------------------------------------- 65 6.4.1 Local TMDLs ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 65 6.4.2 Chesapeake Bay TMDL ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 65 6.5 Bay TMDL Expected Load Reductions ------------------------------------------------------------------- 65 6.6 Cost Summary ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 68 7 Prioritization ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 69 References -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 71 LIST OF TABLES TABLE 1: CHARLES COUNTY BAY TMDL STORMWATER GOALS -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 12 TABLE 2: WATER CHEMISTRY ANALYTICAL METHODS ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 14 TABLE 3: SCA REACH SELECTION AND EXCLUSION FACTORS ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 16 TABLE 4: GENERAL CHARACTERISTICS OF NEIGHBORHOODS ASSESSED------------------------------------------------------------------- 18 TABLE 5: NEIGHBORHOOD POLLUTION SEVERITY AND RESTORATION POTENTIAL -------------------------------------------------------- 20 TABLE 6: HOT SPOT INVESTIGATION LOCATIONS AND OPERATIONS ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 22 TABLE 7: NUTRIENT RANGES AND RATINGS FROM FRINK (1991) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 23 TABLE 8: TOTAL NUTRIENT RANGES AND RATINGS FROM SOUTHERLAND ET AL.,(2005) ----------------------------------------------- 23 TABLE 9: STREAM DISCHARGE MEASUREMENT AND IN SITU WATER QUALITY MEASUREMENT RESULTS -------------------------------- 30 TABLE 10: WATER QUALITY GRAB SAMPLING RESULTS- NUTRIENT AND BACTERIA CONCENTRATIONS AND INSTANTANCEOUS LOADS. 32 TABLE 11: WATERSHED DATA POINTS BY SEVERITY --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 34 TABLE 12: STREAM RESTORATION AND PIPE OUTFALL SITE RANKING CRITERIA --------------------------------------------------------- 46 TABLE 13: STREAM RESTORATION PROJECT DESCRIPTIONS ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 47 TABLE 14: STREAM RESTORATION REMOVAL EFFICIENCY AND IMPERVIOUS ACRE EQUIVALENT ---------------------------------------- 47 TABLE 15: STREAM RESTORATION COST, IMPERVIOUS CREDIT, AND LOAD REDUCTION ------------------------------------------------ 47 TABLE 16: PROPOSED SWM BMP PROJECTS --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 49 TABLE 17: AREA TREATED BY SWM BMP PROJECTS PER TYPE -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 50 TABLE 18: STORMWATER BMP RUNOFF DEPTH TREATED, IMPERVIOUS TREATED, LOAD REDUCTION, AND COST ------------------- 53 TABLE 19: REFORESTATION BMPS EFFICIENCY AND IMPERVIOUS ACRE EQUIVALENT --------------------------------------------------- 54 TABLE 20. REFORESTATION SITE COST, IMPERVIOUS CREDIT, AND LOAD REDUCTION ---------------------------------- 55 TABLE 21: TRASH CLEAN-UP SITES --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 56 TABLE 22: REMOVAL EFFICIENCIES FOR HOMEOWNER PRACTICES ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 57 TABLE 23: PROJECTED NUTRIENT REMOVAL AND IMPERVIOUS CREDIT FROM PLANNED RAIN BARRELS ------------------------------- 59 TABLE 24. PROJECTED NUTRIENT REMOVAL AND IMPERVIOUS CREDIT FROM
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Nanjemoy and Mattawoman Creek Watersheds
    Defining the Indigenous Cultural Landscape for The Nanjemoy and Mattawoman Creek Watersheds Prepared By: Scott M. Strickland Virginia R. Busby Julia A. King With Contributions From: Francis Gray • Diana Harley • Mervin Savoy • Piscataway Conoy Tribe of Maryland Mark Tayac • Piscataway Indian Nation Joan Watson • Piscataway Conoy Confederacy and Subtribes Rico Newman • Barry Wilson • Choptico Band of Piscataway Indians Hope Butler • Cedarville Band of Piscataway Indians Prepared For: The National Park Service Chesapeake Bay Annapolis, Maryland St. Mary’s College of Maryland St. Mary’s City, Maryland November 2015 ii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The purpose of this project was to identify and represent the Indigenous Cultural Landscape for the Nanjemoy and Mattawoman creek watersheds on the north shore of the Potomac River in Charles and Prince George’s counties, Maryland. The project was undertaken as an initiative of the National Park Service Chesapeake Bay office, which supports and manages the Captain John Smith Chesapeake National Historic Trail. One of the goals of the Captain John Smith Trail is to interpret Native life in the Middle Atlantic in the early years of colonization by Europeans. The Indigenous Cultural Landscape (ICL) concept, developed as an important tool for identifying Native landscapes, has been incorporated into the Smith Trail’s Comprehensive Management Plan in an effort to identify Native communities along the trail as they existed in the early17th century and as they exist today. Identifying ICLs along the Smith Trail serves land and cultural conservation, education, historic preservation, and economic development goals. Identifying ICLs empowers descendant indigenous communities to participate fully in achieving these goals.
    [Show full text]
  • Hughesville Revitalization Plan Chapter 4: Environmental Resources
    Hughesville Revitalization Plan Hughesville Sub-Area Plan Existing Conditions Report Chapter 4: Environmental Resources The region is rich with environmentally sensitive areas and natural resources. According to the Maryland Department of Natural Resources (DNR), there are two environmentally sensitive areas within the Hughesville Study Area, including National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) recognized wetlands and a potential greenway (refer to Map 7: Environmentally Sensitive Areas). There are also several environmentally sensitive features adjacent to Hughesville including Rural Legacy Areas, Wetlands of Special State Concern (WSSC), Maryland Environmental Trust Easements (MET), Maryland Agricultural Land Preservation Foundation (MALPF) lands, DNR Lands, and Conservation Reserve Enhancement Program (CREP) eligible areas. According to DNR data, the Hughesville Study Area is located within the Lower Potomac River and Patuxent River watersheds, specifically the Gilbert Swamp and Patuxent River Lower sub basins. Preservation Programs The Charles County MET Program and the Rural Legacy Program function as environment protection programs with an added benefit that they often preserve properties with historic significance. The following is a brief description of each program. Maryland Environmental Trust (MET) The Maryland Environmental Trust, an agency of the Maryland Department of Natural Resources (DNR), holds conservation easements on natural, agricultural, scenic, and historic properties and is the co-holder of numerous easements across the state with the Maryland Historical Trust. Rural Legacy Program DNR’s Rural Legacy Program was established in 1997. Part of the State’s Smart Growth and Neighborhood Conservation Initiative, it is designed to conserve land by protecting areas rich in farms, forests, and natural and cultural resources. The Program achieves this by partnering with local governments, land trusts, and citizens in the purchase of conservation easements.
    [Show full text]
  • Mediamix a Quick Take on New Releases
    C M Y K M8 SOURCE 05-27-07 DC EE M8 CMYK M8 Sunday, May 27, 2007 x The Washington Post RoadTrip Go Tribal in Maryland WHERE: Waldorf. StartStartStart hereherehere Learn about Native American WHY: Hiking on tribal grounds, bows for beginners and powwowing with history, beliefs and tribal life PENN. H ST. with live performances outside the Piscataway. 15TH STREET AVE. PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE the National Museum of ST. the American Indian. The 17TH INDEPENDENCE AVE. 1 HOW FAR: About 70 miles from start to finish, or 2 ⁄2 hours by car from 9TH STREET Indian Summer Showcase, an Washington. evening concert series, is held 395 4TH ST. 295 twice a month from June he Piscataway Indian Festival and Pow-Wow is a true family affair. through September (the first Y one is Saturday). Next weekend, about 300 Native Americans from near (Maryland, 395 A W K R Virginia) and far (Central America, Hawaii) will gather at the Amer- A D.C. P 95 . 495 T M ican Indian Cultural Center in Waldorf to catch up as well as dance, sing, eat E 5 4 M and celebrate. In all, nearly 3,000 folks are expected to attend — extended . W . family, indeed. G Hosted by the Cedarville Band of the Piscataway tribe, the 25th annual 1 The Alexandria Archaeology 295 Museum displays stone tools event is a modern, more social take on the private gatherings the Piscata- CAMERON STREET and other artifacts from the way and other Native American tribes have been practicing for ages. “To- aits native peoples who lived in the George Catlin’s portr Alexandria day’s powwows are extensions of the tribal powwows that existed for hun- ve KING Alexandria area between 500 dreds of years,” says Natalie Proctor, tribal chairwoman of the Cedarville documented vanishing Nati ST.
    [Show full text]
  • Zekiah Swamp IBA Date of Site Account: May 2016
    Important Bird Areas Zekiah Swamp IBA Date of site account: May 2016 County: Charles Status: Recognized Area: 15,088 acres (6,106 ha) Priority: State Red-headed Woodpecker Site Description Zekiah Swamp IBA encompasses 15,088 acres of forest and wetlands in Charles County along Zekiah Swamp Run, a 48-mile network of braided streams in eastern Charles County. The site extends from Poplar Hill Rd just south of Cedarville State Forest to Allen’s Fresh Run and the mouth of the Wicomico River. The major habitat types are deciduous floodplain forest of considerable diversity and upland oak-hickory forest, together accounting for 75% of the area. A number of shrub and emergent herbaceous wetlands, with numerous standing dead trees, have also formed as a result of beaver activity. Scattered patches of loblolly pine account for just less than 3% of the area. About 435 acres of the IBA are owned and managed by the Maryland DNR as the Zekiah Swamp Natural Environment Area (NEA), while the remaining land is privately owned. The northern half of the site lies within the Zekiah Rural Legacy Area. The boundary of this IBA is based on green infrastructure hubs from Maryland’s Green Infrastructure map. Birds Zekiah Swamp IBA is a site of statewide importance for bird conservation. Bird Blitz surveys in 2009 yielded counts exceeding the IBA threshold for one at-risk species (Prothonotary Warbler), and population estimates exceeding IBA thresholds for three additional at-risk species (Wood Thrush, Kentucky Warbler, and Red-Headed Woodpecker). The Prothonotary Warbler is a specialist of floodplain forests and nests in tree cavities.
    [Show full text]
  • CH-706 Smallwood State Park
    CH-706 Smallwood State Park Architectural Survey File This is the architectural survey file for this MIHP record. The survey file is organized reverse- chronological (that is, with the latest material on top). It contains all MIHP inventory forms, National Register nomination forms, determinations of eligibility (DOE) forms, and accompanying documentation such as photographs and maps. Users should be aware that additional undigitized material about this property may be found in on-site architectural reports, copies of HABS/HAER or other documentation, drawings, and the “vertical files” at the MHT Library in Crownsville. The vertical files may include newspaper clippings, field notes, draft versions of forms and architectural reports, photographs, maps, and drawings. Researchers who need a thorough understanding of this property should plan to visit the MHT Library as part of their research project; look at the MHT web site (mht.maryland.gov) for details about how to make an appointment. All material is property of the Maryland Historical Trust. Last Updated: 12-18-2012 CAPSULE SUMMARY Smallwood State Park MIHP # CH-706 Rison vicinity Charles County, Maryland SP=1957 Public Smallwood State Park occupies approximately 629 acres located overlooking the Mattawoman Creek in northwestern Charles County, Maryland. The park was developed from the efforts of local citizens to preserve the eighteenth-century Smallwood's Retreat (MIHP # CH-12), the Charles County home of Revolutionary War hero General William Smallwood (b. 1732-d. 1792). Since 1957, the park has grown to encompass 629 acres and features the museum, a campground, a marina, and an art center. The buildings and the management practices that have shaped the Smallwood State Park since 1957 are not yet fifty years old.
    [Show full text]
  • Happy New Year
    December 2016 ohbike.or g Happy Holidays Happy New Year ohbike.org Whether you head for the gym, hop on your Celebrate the New Year with a bike ride. Find trainer or bundle up and head out for a ride, it’s more December and January rides on the ride important to stay active during the winter months. schedule at www.ohbike.org. Come out and enjoy a walk or a ride. Here are two events to entice you out of your house. New Year’s Day Monumental Tour On Sunday, January 1 at 10:30, meet at Jones Christmas Lights Bike Ride Point Park, under the Wilson Bridge in Alexandria. On Thursday, December 15 at 6:30 pm, Tulane The ride uses the Mt Vernon Trail, does a short tour Drive, Alexandria, VA. This joint ride with PPTC is of the monuments, and stops along the way at a on neighborhood streets in the Belle Haven area to coffee shop. See the ride schedule or contact Joan see Christmas lights and enjoy Christmas music. Oppel, 703-328-9863, [email protected]. Dinner afterwards at a nearby restaurant. Bright front and rear lights are required. For more info, see the Hang Over Mountain Bike Ride ride schedule or contact Joan Oppel, 703-328- On Sunday, January 1 at 10:00 am, enjoy a 14- 9863, [email protected]. mile mountain bike ride in Rosaryville State Park. Meet at the trailhead parking lot on the right. See the Christmas Holiday Walk ride schedule or check with Barry Howard, 301-807- On December 27 at 5:15 pm, walk from Capitol 9676, [email protected].
    [Show full text]
  • Maryland Birdlife
    r MARYLAND BIRDLIFE Cylburn Mansion, 4915 Green Spring Ave, Baltimore 9, Md. I ! r F Volume 15 MARCH 1959 Number 1 THE MARYLAND ORNITHOLOGICAL SOCIETY, INC. Cylburn Mansion, 4915 Green Spring Ave., Baltimore 9, Maryland State President: Dr. Charles J. Stine, 6305 Belair Rd., Baltimore 6, Yd. State Secretary: Mr. Robert M. Bowen, 5011 Leeds Ave., Baltimore 27, Md. State Treasurer: Cdr. Edward P. Wilson, ll9 Arehwond Ave., Annapolis, Md. First Vice President: Mr. Marvin W. Hewitt, Greensboro, Maryland. Second Vice Presidents: Wm. Leeson, Douglas Miner, Elmer ~#orthley, Hazel /;hite, Evelyn Gregory, Richard McCown, Hilda Smith, Francis Uelch. Trustees: Prof. Dnvid Howard, Cdr. Edward ;;ilson, Stephen Simon, Rodney Jones, Dr. Lois 0dell, Mr. and Mrs. A. J. Fletcher, Mr. and Mrs. Ster- ling Edwards, Ualter Braun, George Drumm, Elsie Hevey, Goldie Thomsen, Richard Kleen, Dr. Thomas Ambler, Ronald Nevius. Membership Sec.: Mrs. Shirley Geddes, =03 0verbrook Rd., Balto. 12, Md. LOCAL CHAPrARS Allegany County Bird Club Frederick Branch, M.O.S., Inc. Avid Avists of Anne Arundel Co. Harford County Bird ~lub Belie. Chapter, M.O.S., Inc. Kent County Chapter, M.O.S., Inc. Caroline County Bird Club Takoma Park Nature Club Talbot County Bird Club Out-of-state membership (~aryland Birdlife only) $2.00 Junior membership (under 18 years) .50 Life membership (payable in 3 equal installments) 75.00 Active membership ~2.00 plus LocalChapter dues CONT~TS, MARCH 1959 Occurrence and Measurements of Chickadees Stephen W. Simon 3 Maryland Nest Summary for 195B Mr. and Mrs. A. J. Fletcher 5 Effect of a Severe Snowstorm Richard L.
    [Show full text]
  • Maryland Historical Trust Maryland Department of Planning
    Report to the Governor and the General Assembly 2011 Annual Report of the Maryland Historical Trust Maryland Department of Planning (The property Plumb Grove, located in Washington County, MD, was listed on the National Register of Historic Places in 2011) Maryland Historical Trust Maryland Department of Planning 100 Community Place Crownsville, MD 21032-2023 410-514-7600 www.planning.maryland.gov www.MHT.maryland.gov Martin O’Malley, Governor Anthony G. Brown, Lieutenant Governor Richard E. Hall, Secretary Matthew J. Power, Deputy Secretary Executive Summary The Department of Planning (MDP) is pleased to transmit the 2011 Annual Report of the Maryland Historical Trust (MHT), including information on the MHT Loan Program, the MHT Historic Preservation Grant Program, and the MHT Museum Assistance Program. This report is submitted in accordance with the requirements of State Finance Article §5A-318(c)(16), State Finance Article §5A-327(m), State Finance Article §5A-328(l), and State Finance Article §5A-353(c). Maryland Historical Trust programs promote the preservation and interpretation of historic resources and cultural traditions throughout the State. Throughout the year, MHT staff continued emphasizing growth management, neighborhood revitalization, and economic development through heritage tourism as agency priorities. Noteworthy activities for 2011 include: Assisted With Repair of State House Dome MHT staff continued to provide assistance to the Department of General Services and the State House Trust. Staff provided technical assistance and monitoring of the exterior dome’s repair and repainting project. Architectural conservator John Greenwalt Lee devised a plan that included stripping failed paint down to a solid base prior to repainting, without damaging the early fabric.
    [Show full text]
  • Maryland Land Preservation and Recreation Plan 2014-2018
    Maryland Land Preservation and Recreation Plan 2014-2018 Dear Citizens: Our land is the foundation of our economic and social prosperity, rich in productive forests and farms, vital wildlife habitat, opportunities for recreation and tourism, culture and history. As our State grows and changes, it is important to continually evaluate our mission and investments for the benefit of Maryland and its citizens. As champion of public land conservation and outdoor recreation, DNR is pleased to present the Land Preservation and Recreation Plan for 2014-2018 — a comprehensive, statewide plan that will guide our efforts to conserve open space and enhance outdoor resources on State lands for the next five years. Outlining clear goals and measurable action items, the Plan will enhance coordination among local, County and State planners; promote the benefits of outdoor recreation and natural resources; improve access to land and water-based recreation for every Marylander; and connect public trails and lands to the places where people work, live and play. This Plan was developed in cooperation with State, County and local officials, stakeholders and citizens in accordance with the U.S. Department of Interior, Land and Water Conservation Fund guidelines. By helping direct preservation to priority lands and fostering a greater connection to the outdoors, it supports the benefits of health and recreation, economic vitality and environmental sustainability for all citizens. Sincerely, Martin O’Malley Joseph P. Gill Governor Secretary THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Maryland Land Preservation and Recreation Plan 2014-2018 “Connecting People & Places” Honorable Martin J. O’Malley, Governor State of Maryland Joseph P.
    [Show full text]
  • Fiscal Year 2020 DNR Lands Acreage Report
    Fiscal Year 2020 DNR Lands Acreage Report Table of Contents Overview of the Department’s Public Lands System 4 Land Unit Designations and Types – Definitions 4 County Abbreviations 7 Acreage Summary 8 DNR Acreage by Type of Facility State Park System 9 State Forest System 12 Wildlife Management Areas 13 Fishery Management Areas 15 Undesignated Properties 16 Marine / Communications Facilities 16 DNR Acreage by County Allegany 17 Anne Arundel 17 Baltimore County 17 Calvert 18 Caroline 18 Carroll 18 Cecil 18 Charles 18 Dorchester 19 Frederick 19 Garrett 20 Harford 20 Howard 20 Kent 20 Montgomery 21 Prince George's 21 Queen Anne's 21 Somerset 22 St. Mary's 22 Talbot 22 Washington 22 Wicomico 23 Worcester 23 Maryland’s Heritage Conservation System Statewide Acreage 24 Maryland’s Wildlands Preservation System Statewide Acreage 25 Wildlands Graphic 26 Acreage Report 2020 Page 2 Printed on Recycled Paper Get this data and map links from our FREE app Google Play is a trademark of Google Inc. Apple and the Apple logo are trademarks of Apple Inc., registered in the U.S. and other countries. App Store is a service mark of Apple Inc. Acreage Report 2020 Page 3 Printed on Recycled Paper Overview of the Department’s Public Lands System Maryland is recognized throughout the nation for its innovative land acquisition and protection programs, including Program Open Space, the Rural Legacy Program, and the Maryland Environmental Trust (MET). The Maryland Department of Natural Resources (DNR) owns (in fee simple) and manages over 498,000 acres of public lands and protected open space across the state.
    [Show full text]
  • Heritage Tourism Management Plan
    The Southern Maryland Heritage Area Heritage Tourism Management Plan Prepared for the Southern Maryland Heritage Area Tourism Management Plan Steering Committee By: Redman/Johnston Associates, Ltd. April 2003 Southern Maryland Heritage Area Steering Committee Calvert County Doug Alves Susan Ockert Herman Schieke Calvert Marine Museum Tri-County Council for Southern MD Calvert Co. Dept. Of Economic Dev. Helen Bauer Connie O’Dell Mike Smolek Solomons Victorian Inn Town of Chesapeake Beach Jefferson Patterson Park & Museum Mary Carol Cloak Jenny Plummer-Welker Dwight Williams Calvert Co. Cultural Arts Council Calvert Co. Dept. Of Planning Calvert Co. Dept. Of Natural Resources Doug Meadows Calvert Co. Parks & Recreation Charles County Andy Adnrzejewski Ron Young Maggie Schwartz Reel Bass Adventures Indian Head Town Manager Chaney Enterprises Daryl Anthony Joanne Roland Cindy Thorne Smallwood State Park Charles County Tourism Issac Walton League Cathy Hardy Tom Roland Scott Hill Charles County Dept. Of Planning Charles Co. Department Of Parks Thomas Stone National Historic Site Kathy Kazimer Shady Oaks of Serenity St. Mary’s County Marc Apter Gary Nelson Linda Shepard St. Mary’s College of Maryland Hampton Inn Town of Leonardtown Kim Cullins Phil Rollins Martin Sullivan St. Clements Is./Potomac River Museum St. Mary’s Co. Dept. Of Recreation Historic St. Mary’s City & Parks Erin Gass Sue Veith St. Mary’s County Arts Council John Savich St. Mary’s Co. Dept. Of Planning St. Mary’s Co. Dept. Of Economic & Zoning Carolyn Laray & Community Development St. Mary’s Co. Dept. Of Economic & Community Development Regional Members Christine Bergmark Elizabeth Hughes Jackie Russell Tri-County Council for Southern MD Maryland Historical Trust Skipjack Tours Bob Campbell National Park Service Southern Maryland Heritage Area Tourism Management Plan Table of Contents Introduction...........................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 2018 Annual Report
    Maryland Park Service 2018 Annual Report 1 Photo by Susanne Weber - Sandy Point State Park TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Who We Are…………………………………………..…………. 3-4 II. What We Did by the Numbers Financial Overview……………………………………..... 5 Park Operations……………………………..…….…...... 6 Customer Service …………………………………..…… 7 Natural Resource preservation.;………………...…..…. 8 Cultural and Historic Conservation…………..…..……. 9 Interpretive Programming and Education………..….... 10 Signature Events……………………………………….... 11-12 Maryland Conservation Corps….…………………..….. 13 Conservation Jobs Corps…….……………………..….. 14 Capital and Critical Maintenance Improvements…….. 15 Trail Improvements ……………………………………... 16 Park Planning and Conservation……………………..... 17 Employee Development and Administration………….. 18 III. Our Partners ……………………………………………………. 19 IV. More Information ………………………………………..……... 20 2 WHO WE ARE OUR 75 STATE PARKS Our Dedicated Assateague Greenwell Sandy Point Workforce Belt Woods Gunpowder Falls Sang Run Big Run Harriet Tubman URR Sassafras Managers…53 Bill Burton Fishing Hart-Miller Island Seneca Creek Maintenance…64 Black Walnut Point Herrington Manor Severn Run Bohemia River Janes Island Smallwood Rangers…85 Bush Declaration Love Point Soldiers Delight Administrative…38 Calvert Cliffs Martinak South Mountain Casselman River Bridge Mattawoman South Mountain Battlefield Long-term contractual…34 Cedarville Merkle St. Clements Island Seasonal…803 Chapel Point Monocacy St. Mary's River Chapman Morgan Run Susquehanna TOTAL CLASSIFIED…240 Cunningham Falls New Germany Swallow Falls
    [Show full text]