DOCSLIB.ORG

Maryland Land Preservation and Recreation Plan 2014-2018

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Maryland Land Preservation and Recreation Plan 2014-2018 Maryland Land Preservation and Recreation Plan 2014-2018 Dear Citizens: Our land is the foundation of our economic and social prosperity, rich in productive forests and farms, vital wildlife habitat, opportunities for recreation and tourism, culture and history. As our State grows and changes, it is important to continually evaluate our mission and investments for the benefit of Maryland and its citizens. As champion of public land conservation and outdoor recreation, DNR is pleased to present the Land Preservation and Recreation Plan for 2014-2018 — a comprehensive, statewide plan that will guide our efforts to conserve open space and enhance outdoor resources on State lands for the next five years. Outlining clear goals and measurable action items, the Plan will enhance coordination among local, County and State planners; promote the benefits of outdoor recreation and natural resources; improve access to land and water-based recreation for every Marylander; and connect public trails and lands to the places where people work, live and play. This Plan was developed in cooperation with State, County and local officials, stakeholders and citizens in accordance with the U.S. Department of Interior, Land and Water Conservation Fund guidelines. By helping direct preservation to priority lands and fostering a greater connection to the outdoors, it supports the benefits of health and recreation, economic vitality and environmental sustainability for all citizens. Sincerely, Martin O’Malley Joseph P. Gill Governor Secretary THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Maryland Land Preservation and Recreation Plan 2014-2018 “Connecting People & Places” Honorable Martin J. O’Malley, Governor State of Maryland Joseph P. Gill, Secretary Maryland Department of Natural Resources John F. Wilson, Associate Director for Stewardship Land Acquisition and Planning Prepared By: Maryland Department of Natural Resources 580 Taylor Avenue ‐ Annapolis, MD 21401 Printed on Recycled Paper Land Preservation and Recreation Plan – Recreation Component Page | i ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The Maryland Land Preservation and Recreation Plan was coordinated by the Maryland Department of Natural Resources (DNR). DNR is responsible for administering the Program Open Space (POS) and Land and Water Conservation Fund (LWCF) programs in Maryland. Special recognition is given to the Technical Advisory and Trails Committees for their valuable advice and guidance provided throughout the course of the project. Technical Advisory Committee Kevin Baynes, Maryland Housing and Community Development Gary Burnett, Maryland Park Service Jackie Carrera, Parks & People Foundation Paul Dial, Maryland Association of Counties, Frederick County Recreation and Parks Department Jonathan Doherty, National Park Service Tom Donlin, Maryland Recreation and Parks Association Maureen Dougherty, Frostburg State University Pat Goucher, Maryland Department of Planning Charlie Gougeon, Maryland Fisheries Service Elizabeth Hughes, Maryland Historical Trust Matt Jagunic, National Park Service Joe McNeal, Maryland Municipal League, City of Greenbelt Stephanie Oberle, Brookside Gardens, Maryland National Capital Park and Planning Commission John Papagni, Maryland Housing and Community Development Jared Parks, Eastern Shore Land Conservancy Jack Perdue, Maryland Forest Service Jim Rapp, Delmarva Low Impact Tourism Experience Dan Rosen, Maryland Department of Planning Marci Ross, Maryland Office of Tourism Development Nita Settina, Maryland Park Service Susan Simmons, Maryland Association of Counties, Caroline County Recreation and Parks Department Erica Smith, Maryland Department of Health & Hygiene Karina Stonesifer, Maryland Wildlife and Heritage Service Kate Sylvester, Maryland Department of Transportation Trails Committee Laura Collard, Maryland Association for Environmental and Outdoor Education (MAEOE) Dave Ferraro, Mid‐Atlantic Off Road Enthusiasts (MORE) Ronnie Gathers, Maryland Recreation & Parks Association (MRPA) Steve Green, High Mountain Sports and Garrett Trails Dan Hudson, International Mountain Bike Association (IMBA) Richard Hughes, Maryland Heritage Area Authority Ken Kyler, Mid‐Atlantic Four Wheel Drive Association Ellen Moyer, Former Mayor of Annapolis Ronald MacNabb, Trail Riders of Today (TROT) Rico Newman, Maryland Indian Tourism Association Mike O'Connor, Mountain Club of Maryland Carol Sildorf, Bike Maryland John Wetmore, Perils for Pedestrians Elizabeth Wyble, Friends of Anne Arundel Trails ii ii | Page Maryland Department of Natural Resources Department of Natural Resources Staff and Contributing Authors John F. Wilson, Associate Director of Stewardship, Land Acquisition and Planning Sandra Trent, Administrator, Stewardship, Land Acquisition and Planning Steve Carr, Trails Planner, Land Acquisition and Planning Adam Bossi, Natural Resources Planner, Land Acquisition and Planning Christine Conn, Director, Integrated Policy & Review Lisa Gutierrez, Public Access, Water Trails and Recreation Planning Program Virginia R. Busby, PhD, Maryland Commission on Indian Affairs Project Consultant Team Anne Miller, AICP, Project Manager, GreenPlay, LLC Cindy Heath, CPRP, Project Manager, GreenPlay, LLC Kristin Caborn, CPRE, Project Consultant, GreenPlay, LLC Teresa Penbrooke, MAOM, CPRE, Principal‐in‐Charge, GreenPlay, LLC Carter Marshall, Landscape Designer, Design Concepts David Peterson, Landscape Architect, Design Concepts Mike Simone, Senior Associate, RRC Associates Image Credits: Unless otherwise noted, document images courtesy of Maryland Department of Tourism, Maryland Department of Natural Resources, Maryland State Parks, National Park Service, and the Friendsville Trails Alliance. Land Preservation and Recreation Plan – Recreation Component Page | iii TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ......................................................................................................... 1 A. INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................................... 1 B. PLANNING CONTEXT ............................................................................................................................ 3 C. PLANNING PROCESS & TIMELINE ......................................................................................................... 4 D. KEY FINDINGS ....................................................................................................................................... 6 E. KEY STRATEGIES .................................................................................................................................... 6 F. LAND PRESERVATION AND RECREATION PLAN CHAPTER SUMMARY ................................................ 12 CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................. 13 A. Vision for Land Preservation and Outdoor Recreation in Maryland .................................................. 13 B. Alignment with National Outdoor Recreation Priorities .................................................................... 13 C. Collaborative Outdoor Recreation and Cultural History Projects ...................................................... 14 D. Purpose of the Land Preservation and Recreation Plan .................................................................... 15 E. Value of Outdoor Recreation and Natural Resource Protection ........................................................ 16 F. Outdoor Recreation Impacts on Health and Livability ........................................................................ 22 G. Existing Plan Review ........................................................................................................................... 22 CHAPTER 2: MARYLAND’S OUTDOOR RECREATION DEMAND ............................................ 25 A. Planning Methodology ....................................................................................................................... 25 B. Public Engagement Summary ............................................................................................................. 26 C. Demographic Profile and Analysis ...................................................................................................... 41 D. Trends Analysis ................................................................................................................................... 48 E. Accessibility and Equity ...................................................................................................................... 57 CHAPTER 3: MARYLAND OUTDOOR RECREATION SUPPLY .................................................. 59 A. Public Lands Inventory & Level of Service Analysis ............................................................................ 59 B. Analysis Methodology ........................................................................................................................ 61 C. Inventory and Level of Analysis .......................................................................................................... 62 D. Resource Maps (Reference) ............................................................................................................... 62 E. Perspective Maps (Analytical) ............................................................................................................ 69 F. General Recommendations Based on Findings .................................................................................. 84 CHAPTER
Load more

Recommended publications
  • CATOCTIN MOUNTAIN PARK a Resource Assessment
    ® 006 march 2 CATOCTIN MOUNTAIN PARK A Resource Assessment National Parks Conservation Association Protecting Parks for Future Generations® ® Center for State of the Parks More than a century ago, Congress established Yellowstone as the CONTENTS world’s first national park. That single act was the beginning of a remarkable and ongoing effort to protect this nation’s natural, his- torical, and cultural heritage. Today, Americans are learning that national park designation REPORT SUMMARY 1 alone cannot provide full resource protection. Many parks are com- promised by development of adjacent lands, air and water pollution, invasive plants and animals, and rapid increases in motorized recre- KEY FINDINGS 5 ation. Park officials often lack adequate information on the status of and trends in conditions of critical resources. The National Parks Conservation Association initiated the State of the Parks® program in 2000 to assess the condition of natural and THE CATOCTIN ASSESSMENT cultural resources in the parks, and determine how well equipped the 7 National Park Service is to protect the parks—its stewardship capaci- ty. The goal is to provide information that will help policy-makers, NATURAL RESOURCES 7 the public, and the National Park Service improve conditions in Park Provides Haven for Wildlife national parks, celebrate successes as models for other parks, and and Urbanites ensure a lasting legacy for future generations. For more information about the methodology and research used in preparing this report and to learn more about the Center for State CULTURAL RESOURCES 14 of the Parks®, visit www.npca.org/stateoftheparks or contact: NPCA, Park’s History Includes Prehistoric Center for State of the Parks®, P.O.
    [Show full text]
  • Park Pavilions and Designated Picnic Areas for Rental
    PARK PAVILIONS AND DESIGNATED PICNIC AREAS FOR RENTAL PARK ADDRESS Zip Pavilion Electricity Area Picnic Grill Capacity Gazebo Playground Basketball Court TennisCourt Field Ball AthleticField OutdoorPool WadingPool Skateboard BoatLaunce GolfCourse Center Rec Fee CARROLL PARK: AREA 1 MONROE ST. NR. WASHINGTON BLVD 21230 Y 100 Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y $85 CARROLL PARK: AREA 2 MONROE ST. NR. WASHINGTON BLVD 21230 Y 100 Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y $85 CLIFTON PARK DELEPORTE GROVE INDIAN HEAD DRIVE 21218 Y 75 Y Y Y Y $85 CLIFTON PARK BANDSHELL GROVE HARFORD RD & ST. LO DR 21218 Y 150 Y Y Y Y Y Y Y $85 DRUID HILL PARK - ATRIUM PAVILION RED ROAD & EAST DRIVE 21217 Y Y Y 100 Y Y $115 DRUID HILL PARK - CHINESE PAVILION SWAN DRIVE & EAST DRIVE 21217 Y Y Y 175 Y $170 DRUID HILL PARK - COLUMBUS PAVILION MANSION HOUSE DRIVE & EAST DRIVE 21217 Y Y Y 150 Y $140 DRUID HILL PARK - LIBERTY PAVILION LIBERTY HEIGHTS & BEECHWOOD 21217 Y Y Y 150 $140 DRUID HILL PARK - PARKIE EAST GROVE RED ROAD & EAST DRIVE 21217 Y 100 $85 DRUID HILL PARK - PARKIE LAKESIDE PAVILION RED ROAD & EAST DRIVE 21217 Y Y Y 150 Y Y $140 DRUID HILL PARK - PARKIE WEST GROVE RED ROAD & EAST DRIVE 21217 Y 100 $85 DRUID HILL PARK - SUNDIAL GROVE SWAN DRIVE 21217 Y 100 $85 DRUID HILL PARK - SUNDIAL PAVILION SWAN DRIVE 21217 Y Y Y 75 $115 DRUID HILL PARK - SUSQUEHANNOCK PAVILION EAST DRIVE 21217 Y Y Y 150 Y Y Y Y $140 DRUID HILL PARK - SWANN PAVILION RED ROAD & SHOP ROAD 21217 Y Y Y 100 Y Y $115 GWYNNS FALLS/LEAKIN PARK #1 4921 WINDSOR MILL RD 21217 Y Y 100 Y Y $85 GWYNNS FALLS/LEAKIN PARK #2 4921 WINDSOR MILL RD 21217 Y Y Y 100 Y Y $85 GWYNNS FALLS/LEAKIN PARK #3 4921 WINDSOR MILL RD 21217 Y Y Y 100 Y Y $85 GWYNNS FALLS/LEAKIN PARK #4 4921 WINDSOR MILL RD 21217 Y Y Y 100 Y Y $85 GWYNNS FALLS/WINANS MEADOW FRANKLINTOWN RD 21217 Y Y Y Y 200 $200 HANLON PARK 2400 LONGWOOD ST 21216 Y Y 100 Y $115 HERRING RUN PARK HARFORD RD & ARGONNE DR.
    [Show full text]
  • Native News, September/October 2006
    Native News Newsletter of the Maryland Native Plant Society September/October 2006 Volume 6 Number 5 Inside This Issue: Upcoming Monthly Meetings President’s Letter Page 2 “Goldenrods, Asters, and Thoroughworts” ~ Tuesday, September 26, 7:30 pm MNPS Contacts White Oak Library – Large Meeting Room Page 2 ~ The Asteraceae (Aster Family) is a large and diverse family that is MNPS Announcements especially well-developed in North America. Maryland and the mid- Page 3 Atlantic region are home to a particularly rich diversity of native plants ~ in the Aster Family. Join botanist Rod Simmons for an in-depth Upcoming Chapter Events Page 3 presentation of the many native species of Solidago, Eupatorium, and ~ Aster (formerly) in Maryland. The talk will focus on identification of Wildflower in Focus the common species, but will also include uncommon and rare ones Page 4 and habitats throughout the state where they may be found. Live plant ~ material will be available for hands-on identification. Late Summer/Fall Field Trips Page 5 “The Importance of Hybridization in the ~ Invasive Exotic Plant Systematic Evolution of Oaks” Removal Workdays Tuesday, October 24, 7:30 pm Page 6 White Oak Library – Large Meeting Room ~ General Announcements The oaks are one of North America’s most widespread and important Page 7 trees. Nearly 80 native species of oaks occur in North America, not including the numerous natural hybrids and app. 100 species in Mexico. Maryland is one of the most diverse areas in the east for oaks, with 21 of the 41 oak species native to the eastern U.S., not including hybrids.
    [Show full text]
  • Mdenvironment
    MDEnvironment Volume VI, No. 7 Maryland Department of the Environment November 2002 EPA awards Just $8.9 million playing around MDENIVRONMENT PHOTO for water COURTESY OF ROBERTA DORSCH State agency workers programs and 200 volunteers built a scrap tire play- The U.S. Environmental Protection ground at Smallwood Agency has awarded $8.9 million to the State Park in Charles Maryland Department of the Environment County starting Oct. (MDE) Oct. 30 to improve drinking water 17 and completed the systems and protect drinking water sup- project less than three plies. The state will contribute $1.8 million days later. To learn in matching funds. more and view a gal- “Our country has one of the best sup- lery of images from its plies of safe, clean drinking water in the construction turn to world. This grant is an important step in Page 6. keeping the Maryland drinking water sup- ply healthy,” said Donald S. Welsh, re- gional administrator for EPA’s mid-Atlan- Regional haze may obscure fall’s beauty tic region. About $6.4 million of the funding will be By Bob Maddox disappointed when they find the view is ob- used to provide low interest loans that com- The autumn season has arrived and many scured by haze. Haze consists of small air- munities can use to improve drinking water Marylanders are making travel plans to look borne particles of air pollution such as sul- systems with projects that could include at colorful foliage and fall vistas. People will fates from sulfur dioxide (SO2), nitrates, or- upgrading treatment plants, replacing stor- be eagerly driving to places hoping to see ganic carbon, elemental carbon and crust- age tanks, consolidating inadequate facili- beautiful scenery.
    [Show full text]
  • Lllli[Llllllll ": Ii/I Llll[Lllll
    MARYLAND BIRDLIFE , ! lllli[llllllll ": Ii/Illll[lllll h\A Y LAYJ ,_? P) Volume VI November - December 1950 Number 5 C 0 N T E N T S , , ,, THE SEASON , September - October , 1950 . ..... 56 Chandler S. Robblns Patapsco Valley Field Trip, May V . " " 68 Ruth E. Lenderking Baltimore Field Trips, First Half of 1960 . 69 Orville Crowder MARYLAND BIRDLIFE STAFF Editor Chandler S. Robbins, Patuxent Refuge, Laurel, Md. Art Editor ,, L , Irving E. Hampe, 5559 Ashbourne Rd., Baltimore 27, Md. Associate Editors Miss A~ele Malcolm, 204 Washington St., Cumberland, Md. Mrs. R. B. Green, 1016 Hamilton Blvd., Hagerstown, Md. Rodgers Tull Smith, i01 E. Church St., Frederick, ~id. Mrs. Wm~ A. McComas, 822 Rock Spring Rd., Bel Air, Md. Events 6f November-Decemberar~ MARYLA~ BIRDLIFE reported in the Jan.-Feb. issue, published bi-monthly except for whichclosing date is Jan. I July-August by and publication date Feb. 1. Send field notes and Other material MARYLAND 0ENITHOLOGICAL SOCIETY to your local staff member, or di- 2101 Bolton Street rect to Editor Chandler S. Robblns, Baltimore 17, MarYland Patuxent Research Refuge, Laurel,M~ -54 -...... Voi. VI~ No. 5 ' '_ ~IARYLAh~DBIRDLIFE, ,. __. ~ .... ....... , _ . Nov.-Dec.. 1950, ~..,,,,.:,~.~ ~ ~ ~:~ ~<...~ ~%~ .... :,-,~.~.,, ~-.'T~ / I ! _ "Q'~\~.': I , . ~, '.-~;C~'~ .. ..... :.,:..~:~ ;,:~ ,~:.':~ ~~.~.. .--,~,,.~.,,-~-.~:...:,.:~.. ~.':~,,*,.~ . -,,,.~.~,~,,. ...~ ~,~,. ~ ^..':~,:.-- .~..~ ~'~..~.~ ...,~:,,..~.. ., L~'~:;L. ' ,..-~,~-'~ ~............. ~"~;.,~,, ~--i~,,~ --..:. ~ ~ -.-~ , ~. -.~ . , ,'~ ..... .~ "'~ September and October 1950 Temperatures in September averaged about one degree below normal, but the deficit was due more to cool days than to cold nights. Minimum temperatures were close to the seasonal average except for brief spells from Sept. 5 to 7 and Sept. 24 to 27. The principal migration waves occurred during these cold snaps and to a lesser extent from Sept.
    [Show full text]
  • Maryland's Wildland Preservation System “The Best of the Best”
    Maryland’s Wildland Preservation System “The“The Best Best ofof thethe Best” Best” What is a Wildland? Natural Resources Article §5‐1201(d): “Wildlands” means limited areas of [State‐owned] land or water which have •Retained their wilderness character, although not necessarily completely natural and undisturbed, or •Have rare or vanishing species of plant or animal life, or • Similar features of interest worthy of preservation for use of present and future residents of the State. •This may include unique ecological, geological, scenic, and contemplative recreational areas on State lands. Why Protect Wildlands? •They are Maryland’s “Last Great Places” •They represent much of the richness & diversity of Maryland’s Natural Heritage •Once lost, they can not be replaced •In using and conserving our State’s natural resources, the one characteristic more essential than any other is foresight What is Permitted? • Activities which are consistent with the protection of the wildland character of the area, such as hiking, canoeing, kayaking, rafting, hunting, fishing, & trapping • Activities necessary to protect the area from fire, animals, insects, disease, & erosion (evaluated on a case‐by case basis) What is Prohibited? Activities which are inconsistent with the protection of the wildland character of the area: permanent roads structures installations commercial enterprises introduction of non‐native wildlife mineral extraction Candidate Wildlands •23 areas •21,890 acres •9 new •13,128 acres •14 expansions Map can be found online at: http://dnr.maryland.gov/land/stewardship/pdfs/wildland_map.pdf
    [Show full text]
  • Section III: County Profile
    Section III: County Profile Approved General Plan | 51 SECTION III: COUNTY PROFILE 52 | PLAN Prince George’s 2035 SECTION III: COUNTY PROFILE County Profile and Analysis .....54 Assets and Challenges ............. 72 Indicates that the definition of a word or term may be found in the Glossary of Terms, which starts on page 282. Approved General Plan | 53 County Profile and Analysis COUNTY PROFILE AND ANALYSIS County Profile and Analysis Understanding who Prince George’s County is today and who it is becoming is critical to developing effective policies and strategies to meet the needs of current and future residents. Regional Context Prince George’s County consists of 498 square miles (approximately 320,000 acres). It is bounded by Howard County to the north, Anne Arundel County and Calvert County to the east, Charles County to the south, and Montgomery County, Fairfax County, Virginia, and the District of Columbia to the west (see Map 5). Prince George’s County is located within the Washington metropolitan area, which is home to 5.6 million residents and 3.9 million jobs. The region’s strong and diverse economy is fueled by federal spending that has weathered recent recessions and nurtured growing research, commerce, information, and technology sectors. Municipalities Prince George’s County has 27 incorporated municipalities which help provide a range of critical services for County residents (see Public Facilities Element). Demographic Profile Population With an estimated population of 881,130 in 2012, Prince George’s County is the third most populous jurisdiction in the Washington metropolitan area, following Fairfax County (1,118,602), Virginia and neighboring Montgomery County (1,004,709).
    [Show full text]
  • The Overlook an Independent Newsletter by and for the Residents of Snowden Overlook
    VOLUME 12 ISSUE 4 OCTOBER 2020 THE OVERLOOK AN INDEPENDENT NEWSLETTER BY AND FOR THE RESIDENTS OF SNOWDEN OVERLOOK Chillin’. With limited options for in- TABLE OF CONTENTS: person gatherings, SOCA arranged SOCA News …………………. 2 EDITORIAL for visits from several food trucks, Condo News…………………. 3 all vetted with health and safety in Clubs & Committees.................6 No question about it, the COVID19 mind and maintaining appropriate For Your Health …………...……8 pandemic has resulted in immense social distancing. To the delight of Book Nook...............................9 suffering, staggering loss of life, devoted users of the pool, it finally Travel ……………………..….11 created great hardship for many opened - only a few weeks later Meet Your Neighbors..............13 people and exposed deep fissures than planned - and remained open Miscellany..............................16 in many communities throughout the until October 4, giving swimmers an Public Service ……….………17 United States. Although the statis- extra week! Tech Tips …………………….18 tics show that our zipcode 21045 Rich’s Corner..........................19 has reported the most COVID19 Take a few minutes to test your fa- infections in Howard County, adher- miliarity with the ‘movers and shak- ing to state and county health di- ers’ in the community by matching rectives as well as to measures the photos on page 20 with their adopted by the Snowden Overlook names! NEXT ISSUE Board of Directors has enabled the community to remain virus-free. Wishing you a colorful fall and an January 15, 2021 early Happy New Year, DEADLINE FOR As has become routine, reports SUBMISSIONS from SOCA and the condo associa- — Pamela Bluh Van Oosten tions are included in this issue of The Christy Wilson January 8, 2021 Overlook, as well as a few commit- Editors tee reports.
    [Show full text]
  • CE-1529 Elk Neck State Park
    CE-1529 Elk Neck State Park Architectural Survey File This is the architectural survey file for this MIHP record. The survey file is organized reverse- chronological (that is, with the latest material on top). It contains all MIHP inventory forms, National Register nomination forms, determinations of eligibility (DOE) forms, and accompanying documentation such as photographs and maps. Users should be aware that additional undigitized material about this property may be found in on-site architectural reports, copies of HABS/HAER or other documentation, drawings, and the “vertical files” at the MHT Library in Crownsville. The vertical files may include newspaper clippings, field notes, draft versions of forms and architectural reports, photographs, maps, and drawings. Researchers who need a thorough understanding of this property should plan to visit the MHT Library as part of their research project; look at the MHT web site (mht.maryland.gov) for details about how to make an appointment. All material is property of the Maryland Historical Trust. Last Updated: 11-26-2018 Addendum to Inventory No. CE-1529 Maryland Historical Trust Maryland Inventory of Historic Properties Form Page 1 of 1 Name of Property: Elk Neck State Park Location: Elk Neck Peninsula The following is an update to the "Table of Resources" inventoried at Elk Neck State Park in 2003: MIHP Number Name Condition as of April 2018 CE-1529 Elk Neck State Park, Wersen House Razed, date unknown CE-813 located within CE-1529 Bathon Stone House Razed, 2012 Bathon Barn Razed,2012
    [Show full text]
  • Camping Places (Campsites and Cabins) with Carderock Springs As
    Camping places (campsites and cabins) With Carderock Springs as the center of the universe, here are a variety of camping locations in Maryland, Virginia, Pennsylvania, West Virginia and Delaware. A big round of applause to Carderock’s Eric Nothman for putting this list together, doing a lot of research so the rest of us can spend more time camping! CAMPING in Maryland 1) Marsden Tract - 5 mins - (National Park Service) - C&O canal Mile 11 (1/2 mile above Carderock) three beautiful group campsites on the Potomac. Reservations/permit required. Max 20 to 30 people each. C&O canal - hiker/biker campsites (no permit needed - all are free!) about every five miles starting from Swains Lock to Cumberland. Campsites all the way to Paw Paw, WV (about 23 sites) are within 2 hrs drive. Three private campgrounds (along the canal) have cabins. Some sections could be traveled by canoe on the Potomac (canoe camping). Closest: Swains Lock - 10 mins - 5 individual tent only sites (one isolated - take path up river) - all close to parking lot. First come/first serve only. Parking fills up on weekends by 8am. Group Campsites are located at McCoy's Ferry, Fifteen Mile Creek, Paw Paw Tunnel, and Spring Gap. They are $20 per site, per night with a maximum of 35 people. Six restored Lock-houses - (several within a few miles of Carderock) - C&O Canal Trust manages six restored Canal Lock-houses for nightly rental (some with heat, water, A/C). 2) Cabin John Regional Park - 10 mins - 7 primitive walk-in sites. Pit toilets, running water.
    [Show full text]
  • 19 May 1994 Greenbelt News Review
    What Goes On • • • • •• • Ancl More Sun., May 22, 1 p.m., GHIi An­ 6mnbdt and Budget Aooption, Muni­ ci,pal Bll'ilding. nual ·Meeting, Greenbelt Elementary School Wed. & Thurs., May 25 & 26, 10 a.m. - 7 p.m. Surplllls Mon., May 23, 7 a.m. - 8 p.m., Food Distribution, Municipal Voting contioo:ed for Gm Buildi111g Officers, Greenbelt Municipal Thurs., May 26, 7 :30 p.m., Build. lttws Btuitw Recycle Task Fo~ Meeting, Municipal Build~ng 8 p.m., .City Council Meeting AN INDEPENDENT NEWSPAPER Volume 57, Number 26 P.O. Box 68, Greenbelt, Maryland 20768-0068 Thursday, May 19, 1994 Greenbelt Youth Shot and Killed GHI Annual Meeting Sunday A 13-year-old Greenbelt Followed by Board Election youth was shot to death in Greenbelt East l'ate last Fri­ C.J. - A Life Remembered Greenbelt Homes, Ine. (GHI) members will choose four day afternoon (May 13) The day following C. J. Brown's murder, the site of members to serve two years on the board of directors from whMe anguished friends his death was turned into a makeshift shrine as friends, seven candidates at the annual meeting and election on May looked on h~plessly. Green­ family nem'bers, classmates, and strangers came and went 22/ 23. The annual meeting will begin as soon after 1 p.m. belt police a:pprehended nine as a quorum is established on Sunday, May 22 at the new to lay flowers there and to mourn in a kind of spontaneous Greenbelt Elementary School. male youths shortly thereaf­ wake. It continued sporadically through the next day.
    [Show full text]
  • Field Trips Guide Book for Photographers Revised 2008 a Publication of the Northern Virginia Alliance of Camera Clubs
    Field Trips Guide Book for Photographers Revised 2008 A publication of the Northern Virginia Alliance of Camera Clubs Copyright 2008. All rights reserved. May not be reproduced or copied in any manner whatsoever. 1 Preface This field trips guide book has been written by Dave Carter and Ed Funk of the Northern Virginia Photographic Society, NVPS. Both are experienced and successful field trip organizers. Joseph Miller, NVPS, coordinated the printing and production of this guide book. In our view, field trips can provide an excellent opportunity for camera club members to find new subject matter to photograph, and perhaps even more important, to share with others the love of making pictures. Photography, after all, should be enjoyable. The pleasant experience of an outing together with other photographers in a picturesque setting can be stimulating as well as educational. It is difficullt to consistently arrange successful field trips, particularly if the club's membership is small. We hope this guide book will allow camera club members to become more active and involved in field trip activities. There are four camera clubs that make up the Northern Virginia Alliance of Camera Clubs McLean, Manassas-Warrenton, Northern Virginia and Vienna. All of these clubs are located within 45 minutes or less from each other. It is hoped that each club will be receptive to working together to plan and conduct field trip activities. There is an enormous amount of work to properly arrange and organize many field trips, and we encourage the field trips coordinator at each club to maintain close contact with the coordinators at the other clubs in the Alliance and to invite members of other clubs to join in the field trip.
    [Show full text]