February 1980) the Ols Ar Ocean Energy Liaison
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Nova Southeastern University NSUWorks The TEO C Liaison NSU Digital Collections 2-1-1980 Volume 4, Number 2 (February 1980) The olS ar Ocean Energy Liaison Follow this and additional works at: https://nsuworks.nova.edu/nsudigital_otec-liaison Part of the Energy Policy Commons, Environmental Studies Commons, Natural Resources Management and Policy Commons, Oceanography Commons, Oil, Gas, and Energy Commons, Science and Technology Studies Commons, and the Water Resource Management Commons NSUWorks Citation The oS lar Ocean Energy Liaison, "Volume 4, Number 2 (February 1980)" (1980). The OTEC Liaison. 30. https://nsuworks.nova.edu/nsudigital_otec-liaison/30 This Newsletter is brought to you for free and open access by the NSU Digital Collections at NSUWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in The OTEC Liaison by an authorized administrator of NSUWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ., INCORPORATING I ,· Solar The OTEC Liaison OCEAN ENERGY VOLUME 4 NUMBER 2 Liaison February 1980 THE 1981 US FEDERAL BUDGET: HOW DID DOE FARE? SOLAR/RENEWABLE ENERGY? OCEAN SYSTEMS? THE 1981 US FEDERAL BUDGET The DOE Budget S868 million, also struggling with inflation. However viewed another way, the funding This article is intended to provide the While the new DOE budget increase is of solar applications would increase 20%. reader with a balanced overview on current comparatively small, it masks some major Augmented by $355 million in tax credits federal funding (see inset on "Changeable changes . The biggest drop shows up in the and S436 million worth of programs out Funding Levels" in this issue) and how the nuclear-fission program-from $1.2 billion side DOE, the overall solar commitment by OTEC program will be affected. in FY 1980 to S925 million in FY 1981. the Federal Government would run S1. 5 Also, various funding levels will be ex Although research on light-water reactors billion. amined from several viewpoints to allow would double in the 1981 budget to S50 These tax credits are dealt with in a sep the reader to see them in varying perspec million (consistent with President Carter's arate story in this issue. tives. Inevitably, some will conclude that vow to increase safety- related programs in OTEC/Ocean Energy is making excellent the wake of Three Mile Island), a major A Potpourri of Commentary progress, while others will be convinced drop in the liquid-metal fast-breeder pro . on Solar Funding that OTEC is being held back ... depend gram-largely owing to the cutback on the ing on how one interprets present circum Clinch River Breeder Reactor from $614 In testi mony before the Congressional sta nces. million last year-accounts for most of the Subcommittee on Energy Development and [Behind all this, of course, is the relent change. Application, lobbyists for the Solar Lobby less debate over what proportion of the Two additional areas showing substan maintained that the minimum DOE solar: funding of energy-resource development tial increases are magnetic fusion and fossil program for Fiscal Year 1981 should be should be borne by the Federal Govern energy, with 13.5% and 30% increases re about S850 million to adequately reflect ment and what proportion should be borne spectively. For the first time, DOE's coal President Carter's national commitment to by private industry. Strong arguments per work - research, development, and com provide 20% of our energy needs in the sist on both sides, but neither will be ex mercialization- will exceed S1 billion. Es year 2000 with renewable resources. amined herein.] pecially notable are two "solvent-refined Thomas E. Stelson, 'who was sworn in coal" plants slated for a 115% increase. on January 7th, 1980 as DOE's Assistant Overall R&D Funding Fusion watchers will find interesting Car Secretary for Conservation and Solar En ter's proposed slowdown in the inertial ergy, stated in a recent interview: "The Stressing a need to cut mounting bud confinement program (which includes laser national goal of 20% solar energy in 20 get deficits, President Carter sent to Con fusion experiments). Whi Ie magnetic- con years is an achievable target, but clearly gress in late January plans for a Fiscal Year finement-fusion funding increases, it does there are some technologies that have 1981 budget that show a paring of the fat not come close to keeping pace with infla complexities which require sophisticated in nearly all areas except spending on de tion. research and have a longer-range program fense and federally-funded research. In re development schedule. I think that in 70. search, the big winner remains the Depart The DOE Solar Budget: years from now, solar energy probably will ment of Defense (DOD), with 45% of its Up 13% To 20% be the dominant energy discipline, where budget- roughly S17 billion- devoted to the most innovative, exciting, and produc R&D. This is a 20.2% increase over the At first glance, the FY 1980 funding tiveenergy research takes place. I think present year. for Solar and Other Renewables shows an we're in the early stage of an important The only other major increase is for the increase of 13%- from S771 million to (continued on Page 2) National Science Foundation, which will receive a 17.7% increase, though its budget RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT BASIC RESEARCH will reach only S1 billion . (Millions of dollars) I n marked contrast to the DOD, the De Percent . Percent partment of Energy (DOE) shows only a change change Agency 1980 Est. 1981 Est. 1980·81 1980 Est. 1981 Est. 1980·81 modest increase of 4.7% to S8 .1 billion. Total $31.956 $36.136 +13.1 $4.5.31 . $5.074 .. ~ .+12.0 .. a:i· This is especially ironic, since one of the DOD 13.781 16.565 431 523 +21.4 ::;; +202 0 major objectives of maintaining military NASA 5.114 '0 5.617 + 9.8 538 581 + 8.1 0 ~ defensive superiority is the protection of DOE 4.919 5.106 + 3.8 523 593 + 13.4 a. >- US energy resources to reduce dependence HHS 3.784 4.011 .; 6.0 3.332 3.544 + 6.3 Cf) NSF 897 1.056 +17.7 814 952 +16.9 0 on Middle Eastern oil. As pointed out by 1; - USDA 743 786 + 5.8 289 324 +12 1 '0 Congressman Melvin Evans of the Virgin ~ EPA 415 445 + 7.3 14 19 +35.7 '0 Islands in the Studds hearings, energy ex INTERIOR 419 415 1.0 78 + 2.6 - 76 0.~ penditures toward non-dependence on for ALL OTHERS 1.884 2.135 +13.3 118 164 " +38.9 ~ 1i eign oil are, realistically, defense expendi 0 tu res. OVERALL FY 1981 RESEARCH BUDGET BY AGENCY (DOE's combined total of R&D and basic research funds is increased by 4.7%) - Solar Budget Authorit~ DEPARTMENT OF ENERG Y (I n \1 iJiions) FY 1981 BUDGET OCEAN ENERGY FY 1980 n 1981 Liaison E'\ERty Energy Consenation ................... .. ...... S 815 S 1.067 INCORPORATING Research. De\elopment & Applications .. ....... 3.730 4.092 Regulation & Information ...................... 379 355 The OTEC Liaison Direct Energy Production ..... ........• . ...... 488 408 Subtotal ..................... ...... .. ... S 5.412 S 5.922 AN INTERNATIONAL NEWSLETIER .. ENGAGED AS LIAISON FOR ALL Strategic Petroleum Resen e 0 2.404 FORMS OF SOLAR ENERGY FROM Energy Security Resene ...... ................ 2.208 0 THE SEA. I!'!ICLUDING: * E,\ERGY TOTAL ................................ S 7.620 S 8.326 OTEC (OCEAN THERMAL GE'\ERAL SCIE'\CE ....................... .. .. .. 472 523 DEFE'\SE ,.1.CTI\ITIES , ......... ............... 3.008 3.443 ENERGY CONVERSION) DEPART\1E,\T ..1.L AD\11,\ISTRATIO,\ ' ........ 275 362 WAVE - TIDAL - CURRENT LEGISLATI\E PROPOSAL-SPE'\T FLEL ....... 300 0 OFFSHORE WIND - BIOMASS SALINITY GRADIENTS TOTAL DOE ............ ...... ............ SII.675' S 12.654 , 1980 column includes enacted appropriations and proposed supplementals of S517 million. VOLUME 4 NUMBER 2 February 1980 * THE ENERGY TOTAL is further broken down in a separate table in this issue. EDITOR/PUBLISHER Richard Arlen Meyer 1981 US FEDERAL BUDGET pects for the next 30 years are rooted in TYPESETTER (continued from Page 1 ) conserving energy and relying on coal and AND COpy EDITOR evolution or transition, and I hope to get nuclear electrical generation. Shelly Treshansky that transition started and better organ "Because of their higher economic cost," ized. " the report concluded, "solar technologies ART DIRECTOR Asked to comment on questions chal other than hydroelectric power will prob Pamela Greenfield lenging the adequacy of the 1981 solar ably not contribute much more than 5% to budget to reach the 20-year goal, Stelson the energy supply in this century unless BUSINESS MANAGER responded as follows: there is a massive government intervention Kathleen Guido "I think it's a little unfair to take a goal to penalize the use of non-renewable fuels that's to be achieved 20 years from now and subsidize the use of renewable energy SUBSCRIPTION MANAGER one that will require individual, local-com resources. Mildred Ward munity, state, regional-planning-council, This intervention on behalf of solar runs and Federal Government action- and look the risk of locking the nation into obsolete Solar OCEAN ENERGY Liaison at one single year and say that we don't and expensive technologies with high ma is published monthly by Popular Products have enough in the Federal Budget to terials and resource requirements, whereas Incorporated at 1303 South Michigan achieve a goal that's 20 years away. I think greater reliance on 'natural' market pene Aven",e. Chicago, Illinois 60605. USA. we're going to see more money in the fu tration would be less costly and more effi Phone (312) 427- 3000. Printed in USA. ture because of the importance of this en cient over the long term." Copyright 1980 by Popular Products ergy source, and I have no doubt that we're Solar Lobby co-ordinator Richard Mun Incorporated.