Image description. Cover Image End of image description.

NATIONAL CENTER FOR EDUCATION STATISTICS

What Is IPEDS?

The Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS) is a system of survey components that collects data from nearly 7,000 institutions that provide postsecondary education across the United States. IPEDS collects institution-level data on students (enrollment and graduation rates), student charges, program completions, faculty, staff, and finances.

These data are used at the federal and state level for policy analysis and development; at the institutional level for benchmarking and peer analysis; and by students and parents, through the College Navigator (http://collegenavigator.ed.gov), to aid in the college search process. For more information about IPEDS, see http://nces.ed.gov/ipeds.

What Is the Purpose of This Report?

The Data Feedback Report is intended to provide institutions a context for examining the data they submitted to IPEDS. Our goal is to produce a report that is useful to institutional executives and that may help improve the quality and comparability of IPEDS data.

What Is in This Report?

The figures provided in this report are those suggested by the IPEDS Technical Review Panel. They were developed to provide selected indicators and data elements for your institution and a comparison group of institutions. The figures are based on data collected during the 2010-11 IPEDS collection cycle and are the most recent data available. Additional information about these indicators is provided in the Methodological Notes at the end of the report. On the next page is a list of the institutions in your comparison group and the criteria used for their selection. Please refer to "Comparison Group" in the Methodological Notes for more information.

Where Can I Do More with IPEDS Data?

The Executive Peer Tool (ExPT) is designed to provide campus executives easy access to institutional and comparison group data. Using the ExPT, you can produce reports using different comparison groups and access a wider range of IPEDS variables. The ExPT is available through the IPEDS Data Center (http://nces.ed.gov/ipeds/data center).

Tyler Junior College Tyler, TX IPEDS DATA FEEDBACK REPORT

COMPARISON GROUP

Comparison group data are included to provide a context for interpreting your institution’s statistics. If your institution did not define a Custom Comparison Group for this report by July 15, NCES selected a comparison group for you. (In this case, the characteristics used to define the comparison group appears below.) The Executive Peer Tool (ExPT)(http://nces.ed.gov/ipeds/datacenter/) can be used to reproduce the figures in this report using different peer groups.

The custom comparison group chosen by Tyler Junior College includes the following 10 institutions:

Amarillo College (Amarillo, TX) (Brenham, TX) Central College (Killeen, TX) Del Mar College (Corpus Christi, TX) (Kilgore, TX) Laredo Community College (Laredo, TX) Navarro College (Corsicana, TX) South Plains College (Levelland, TX) South (McAllen, TX) Trinity Valley Community College (Athens, TX)

Tyler Junior College 2 IPEDS DATA FEEDBACK REPORT

Figure 1. Percent of all students enrolled, by race/ethnicity and percent of students who are women: Fall 2010

Image description. YBar scale chart titled with Percent. 10 groups with 2 items per group. ItemGroup 1, 1,Your American institution Indian 0.01. or Alaska Native. GroupItem 2, 2, Comparison Asian. Group Median (N=10) 1. Item 2,1, ComparisonYour institution Group 2. Median (N=10) 1. ItemGroup 1, 3,Your Black institution or African 23. American. GroupItem 2, 4, Comparison Hispanic/Latino. Group Median (N=10) 7. Item 2,1, ComparisonYour institution Group 11. Median (N=10) 24. ItemGroup 1, 5,Your Native institution Hawaiian 0.01. or other Pacific Islander. GroupItem 2, 6, Comparison White. Group Median (N=10) 0.01. Item 2,1, ComparisonYour institution Group 62. Median (N=10) 54. ItemGroup 1, 7,Your Two institution or more races.0.01. GroupItem 2, 8, Comparison Race/ethnicity Group unknown. Median (N=10) 0.01. Item 2,1, ComparisonYour institution Group 1. Median (N=10) 2. ItemGroup 1, 9,Your Nonresident institution alien. 1. GroupItem 2, 10, Comparison Women. Group Median (N=10) 1. Item 2,1, ComparisonYour100 institution Group 59. Median (N=10) 58. Race/ethnicityShape or gender line,Shape Label: InstitutionLegend,Shape Label: Your institution ComparisonGroupLegend,Shape Label: Comparison Group Median (N=10) ComparisonGroupLegendLine1,Shape Label: ComparisonGroupLegendLine2,End of image90 description. Label:

80

70 62 59 58 60 54

50

Percent 40

30 23 24 20 11 7 10 0 1 2 1 0 0 0 0 1 2 1 1 0 American Indian or Asian Black or Hispanic/Latino Native Hawaiian White Two or more races Race/ethnicity Nonresident alien Women Alaska Native African American or other unknown Pacific Islander

Race/ethnicity or gender

Your institution Comparison Group Median (N=10) NOTE: For this survey year, institutions were required to report race and ethnicity using the 1997 (new) Office of Management and Budget categories. For more information about disaggregation of data by race and ethnicity, please see the Methodological Notes at the end of this report. Median values for the comparison group will not add to 100 percent. See "Use of Median Values for Comparison Group" in the Methodological Notes at the end of this report for how median values are determined. N is the number of institutions in the comparison group. SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS): Spring 2011, Fall Enrollment component.

Figure 2. Unduplicated 12-month headcount (2009-10), total FTE Figure 3. Number of degrees and certificates awarded, by level: enrollment (2009-10), and full- and part-time fall 2009-10 enrollment (Fall 2010)

Image description. Image description. Enrollment measure Level of award XHorizontal scale titled Bar Number chart with of students.4 groups with 2 items per group. XHorizontal scale titled Bar Number chart with of awards.4 groups with 2 items per group. ItemGroup 1, 1,Your Unduplicated institution 15164.headcount - total. ItemGroup 1, 1,Your Associate's. institution 1028. GroupItem 2, 2, Comparison Total FTE enrollment.Group Median (N=10) 14697. GroupItem 2, 2, Comparison Certificates Group of at least Median 2 but (N=10) less than 724. 4 years. Item 2,1, ComparisonYour institution Group 8607. Median (N=10) 7410. Item 2,1, ComparisonYour institution Group 0.01. Median (N=10) 0.01. ItemGroup 1, 3,Your Full-time institution fall enrollment. 6234. ItemGroup 1, 3,Your Certificates institution of 354. at least 1 but less than 2 years. GroupItem 2, 4, Comparison Part-time fall Group enrollment. Median (N=10) 4418. GroupItem 2, 4, Comparison Certificates Group of less Median than 1 (N=10)year. 287. Item 2,1, ComparisonYour institution Group 5504. MedianEnrollment (N=10) 6966. measure Item 2,1, ComparisonYour institution Group 267. Median (N=10)Level 209. of award Shape Shape line,Shape Label: line,Shape Label: InstitutionLegend,Shape Label: Your institution InstitutionLegend,Shape Label: Your institution ComparisonGroupLegend,Shape Label: Comparison Group Median (N=10) ComparisonGroupLegend,Shape Label: Comparison Group Median (N=10) ComparisonGroupLegendLine1,Shape Label: ComparisonGroupLegendLine1,Shape Label: ComparisonGroupLegendLine2,End of image description. Label: ComparisonGroupLegendLine2,End of image description. Label:

Unduplicated 15,164 1,028 Associate's headcount - total 14,697 724

Total FTE 8,607 Certificates of at least 2 0 enrollment 7,410 but less than 4 years 0

Full-time 6,234 Certificates of at least 1 354 fall enrollment 4,418 but less than 2 years 287

Part-time 5,504 Certificates of less 267 fall enrollment 6,966 than 1 year 209

0 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 0 200 400 600 800 1,000 1,200 Number of students Number of awards

Your institution Comparison Group Median (N=10) Your institution Comparison Group Median (N=10) NOTE: For details on calculating full-time equivalent (FTE) enrollment, see NOTE: N is the number of institutions in the comparison group. Calculating FTE in the Methodological Notes at the end of this report. N is the SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, number of institutions in the comparison group. Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS): Fall 2010, Completions SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, component. Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS): Fall 2010, 12-month Enrollment component and Spring 2011, Fall Enrollment component.

Tyler Junior College 3 IPEDS DATA FEEDBACK REPORT

Figure 4. Academic year tuition and required fees for full-time, Figure 5. Average net price of attendance for full-time, first-time, first-time, degree/certificate-seeking undergraduates: degree/certificate-seeking undergraduate students 2007-08--2010-11 receiving grant or scholarship aid: 2007-08--2009-10

Image description. Image description. Academic year Academic year XHorizontal scale titled Bar Tuition chart withand 4fees. groups with 2 items per group. XHorizontal scale titled Bar Net chart price. with 3 groups with 2 items per group. ItemGroup 1, 1,Your 2010-11. institution $2000. ItemGroup 1, 1,Your 2009-10. institution $4833. GroupItem 2, 2, Comparison 2009-10. Group Median (N=10) $1580. GroupItem 2, 2, Comparison 2008-09. Group Median (N=10) $5763. Item 2,1, ComparisonYour institution Group $1912. Median (N=10) $1497. Item 2,1, ComparisonYour institution Group $5738. Median (N=10) $4885. ItemGroup 1, 3,Your 2008-09. institution $1662. ItemGroup 1, 3,Your 2007-08. institution $5253. GroupItem 2, 4, Comparison 2007-08. Group Median (N=10) $1496. Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=10) $4834. Item 2,1, ComparisonYour institutionAcademic Group $1482. Median (N=10) $1481. year line, Shape Label: Academic year Shape InstitutionLegend, Shape Label: Your institution line,Shape Label: ComparisonGroupLegend, Shape Label: Comparison Group Median (N=10) InstitutionLegend,Shape Label: Your institution ComparisonGroupLegendLine1, Shape Label: ComparisonGroupLegend,Shape Label: Comparison Group Median (N=10) ComparisonGroupLegendLine2, Shape Label: ComparisonGroupLegendLine1,Shape Label: End of image description. ComparisonGroupLegendLine2,End of image description. Label:

$2,000 2010-11 $4,833 $1,580 2009-10 $5,763

$1,912 2009-10 $1,497 $5,738 2008-09 $4,885 $1,662 2008-09 $1,496

$5,253 $1,482 2007-08 2007-08 $4,834 $1,481

$0 $500 $1,000 $1,500 $2,000 $2,500 $0 $1,000 $2,000 $3,000 $4,000 $5,000 $6,000 Tuition and fees Net price Your institution Comparison Group Median (N=10) Your institution Comparison Group Median (N=10) NOTE: The tuition and required fees shown here are the lowest reported from the NOTE: Average net price is for full-time, first-time, degree/certificate-seeking categories of in-district, in-state, and out-of-state. N is the number of institutions in undergraduate students and is generated by subtracting the average amount of the comparison group. federal, state/local government, and institutional grant and scholarship aid from the SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, total cost of attendance. For public institutions, this includes only students who Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS): Fall 2010, Institutional paid the in-state or in-district tuition rate. Total cost of attendance is the sum of Characteristics component. published tuition and required fees, books and supplies, and the weighted average room and board and other expenses. For more information, see the Methodological Notes at the end of this report. N is the number of institutions in the comparison group. SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS): Fall 2010, Institutional Characteristics component; Spring 2011, Student Financial Aid component.

Figure 6. Percent of full-time, first-time degree/certificate-seeking Figure 7. Average amounts of grant or scholarship aid from the undergraduate students who received grant or federal government, state/local government, or the scholarship aid from the federal government, state/local institution, or loans received, by full-time, first-time government, or the institution, or loans, by type of aid: degree/certificate-seeking undergraduate students, by 2009-10 type of aid: 2009-10

Image description. Image description. Type of aid Type of aid XHorizontal scale titled Bar Percent chart with of students. 8 groups with 2 items per group. XHorizontal scale titled Bar Aid chart dollars. with 8 groups with 2 items per group. ItemGroup 1, 1,Your Any institution grant aid. 65. ItemGroup 1, 1,Your Any institution grant aid $5217.(N=10). GroupItem 2, 2, Comparison Federal grants. Group Median (N=10) 72. GroupItem 2, 2, Comparison Federal grants Group (N=10). Median $4893. Item 2,1, ComparisonYour institution Group 53. Median (N=10) 59. Item 2,1, ComparisonYour institution Group $5101. Median $4808. ItemGroup 1, 3,Your Pell institution grants. 53. ItemGroup 1, 3,Your Pell institution grants (N=10). $4785. GroupItem 2, 4, Comparison State/local Groupgrants. Median (N=10) 57. GroupItem 2, 4, Comparison State/local Groupgrants Median(N=10). $4502. Item 2,1, ComparisonYour institution Group 18. MedianType (N=10) 29. of aid Item 2,1, ComparisonYour institution Group $1615. MedianType $1527. of aid ItemGroup 1, 5,Your Institutional institution grants. 15. ItemGroup 1, 5,Your Institutional institution grants $2710. (N=9). GroupItem 2, 6, Comparison Any loans. Group Median (N=10) 18. GroupItem 2, 6, Comparison Any loans Group(N=10). Median $913. Item 2,1, ComparisonYour institution Group 50. Median (N=10) 22. Item 2,1, ComparisonYour institution Group $5566. Median $4234. ItemGroup 1, 7,Your Federal institution loans. 50. ItemGroup 1, 7,Your Federal institution loans $5566. (N=9). GroupItem 2, 8, Comparison Other loans. Group Median (N=10) 22. GroupItem 2, 8, Comparison Other loans Group (N=3). Median $4310. Item 2,1, ComparisonYour institution Group 0.01. Median (N=10) 0.01. Item 2,1, ComparisonYour institution Group No data.Median $738. line, Shape Label: line, Shape Label: InstitutionLegend, Shape Label: Your institution InstitutionLegend, Shape Label: Your institution ComparisonGroupLegend, Shape Label: Comparison Group Median (N=10) ComparisonGroupLegend, Shape Label: Comparison Group Median ComparisonGroupLegendLine1, Shape Any grant Label: ComparisonGroupLegendLine1, Shape Any grant Label: ComparisonGroupLegendLine2, Shape Label: 65 ComparisonGroupLegendLine2, Shape Label: $5,217 End of image description.aid 72 End of imageaid description. (N=10) $4,893

Federal 53 Federal $5,101 grants 59 grants (N=10) $4,808

Pell 53 Pell $4,785 grants 57 grants (N=10) $4,502

State/local 18 State/local $1,615 grants 29 grants (N=10) $1,527

Institutional 15 Institutional $2,710 grants 18 grants (N=9) $913

Any loans Any loans 50 $5,566 22 (N=10) $4,234

Federal 50 Federal $5,566 loans 22 loans (N=9) $4,310

Other loans Other loans 0 0 (N=3) $738

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 $0 $1,000 $2,000 $3,000 $4,000 $5,000 $6,000 Percent of students Aid dollars

Your institution Comparison Group Median (N=10) Your institution Comparison Group Median NOTE: Any grant aid above includes grant or scholarship aid from the federal NOTE: Any grant aid above includes grant or scholarship aid from the federal government, state/local government, or the institution. Federal grants includes Pell government, state/local government, or the institution. Federal grants includes Pell grants and other federal grants. Any loans includes federal loans and other loans to grants and other federal grants. Any loans includes federal loans and other loans to students. For details on how students are counted for financial aid reporting, see students. Average amounts of aid were calculated by dividing the total aid awarded Cohort Determination in the Methodological Notes at the end of this report. N is the by the total number of recipients in each institution. N is the number of institutions number of institutions in the comparison group. in the comparison group. SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS): Spring 2011, Student Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS): Spring 2011, Student Financial Aid component. Financial Aid component.

Tyler Junior College 4 IPEDS DATA FEEDBACK REPORT

Figure 8. Percent of all undergraduates receiving aid by type of Figure 9. Average amount of aid received by all undergraduates, aid: 2009-10 by type of aid: 2009-10

Image description. Image description. HorizontalType of aid Bar chart with 3 groups with 2 items per group. HorizontalType of aid Bar chart with 3 groups with 2 items per group. GroupX scale 1, titled Any Percentgrant aid. of students. GroupX scale 1, titled Any Aidgrant dollars. aid (N=10). Item 2,1, ComparisonYour institution Group 45. Median (N=10) 49. Item 2,1, ComparisonYour institution Group $4598. Median $4069. ItemGroup 1, 2,Your Pell institution grants. 36. ItemGroup 1, 2,Your Pell institution grants (N=10). $4482. GroupItem 2, 3, Comparison Federal loans. Group Median (N=10) 34. GroupItem 2, 3, Comparison Federal loans Group (N=9). Median $3728. Item 2,1, ComparisonYour institution Group 35. Median (N=10) 19. Item 2,1, ComparisonYour institution Group $6332. Median $4549. Shape Shape line,Shape Label: Type of aid line,Shape Label: Type of aid InstitutionLegend,Shape Label: Your institution InstitutionLegend,Shape Label: Your institution ComparisonGroupLegend,Shape Label: Comparison Group Median (N=10) ComparisonGroupLegend,Shape Label: Comparison Group Median ComparisonGroupLegendLine1,Shape Label: ComparisonGroupLegendLine1,Shape Label: ComparisonGroupLegendLine2,End of image description. Label: ComparisonGroupLegendLine2,End of image description. Label:

45 $4,598 Any grant aid Any grant aid (N=10) 49 $4,069

36 $4,482 Pell grants Pell grants (N=10) 34 $3,728

35 $6,332 Federal Federal loans loans (N=9) 19 $4,549

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 $0 $2,000 $4,000 $6,000 $8,000 Percent of students Aid dollars Your institution Comparison Group Median (N=10) Your institution Comparison Group Median NOTE: Any grant aid above includes grant or scholarship aid from the federal NOTE: Any grant aid above includes grant or scholarship aid from the federal government, state/local government, the institution, or other sources. Federal loans government, state/local government, the institution, or other sources. Federal loans includes only federal loans to students. N is the number of institutions in the includes federal loans to students. Average amounts of aid were calculated by comparison group. dividing the total aid awarded by the total number of recipients in each institution. N SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, is the number of institutions in the comparison group. Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS): Spring 2011, Student SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, Financial Aid component. Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS): Spring 2011, Student Financial Aid component.

Figure 10. Graduation rate and transfer-out rate (2007 cohort); Figure 11. Graduation rates of full-time, first-time, degree/ graduation rate cohort as a percent of total entering certificate-seeking undergraduates within students, and retention rates of first-time students (Fall normal time, and 150% and 200% of normal time to 2010) completion: 2006 cohort

Image description. Image description. HorizontalMeasure Bar chart with 5 groups with 2 items per group. HorizontalTime to program Bar chart completion with 3 groups with 2 items per group. GroupX scale 1, titled Graduation Percent. rate, overall (N=10). GroupX scale 1, titled Normal Graduation time. rate. Item 2,1, ComparisonYour institution Group 16. Median 14. Item 2,1, ComparisonYour institution Group 4. Median (N=9) 8. ItemGroup 1, 2,Your Transfer-out institution rate 28. (N=9). ItemGroup 1, 2,Your 150% institution of normal 10. time. GroupItem 2, 3, Comparison Graduation Group rate cohort Median as 20.a percent of total entering students (N=10). GroupItem 2, 3, Comparison 200% of normal Group time. Median (N=9) 13. Item 2,1, ComparisonYour institution Group 55. Median 36. Item 2,1, ComparisonYour institution Group 15. Median (N=9) 20. ItemGroup 1, 4,Your Full-time institution retention 45. rate (N=10). Shape GroupItem 2, 5, Comparison Part-time retention Group Median rate (N=10). 55. Measure line,Shape Label: Time to program completion Item 2,1, ComparisonYour institution Group 48. Median 49. InstitutionLegend,Shape Label: Your institution Shape ComparisonGroupLegend,Shape Label: Comparison Group Median (N=9) line,Shape Label: ComparisonGroupLegendLine1,Shape Label: InstitutionLegend,Shape Label: Your institution ComparisonGroupLegendLine2,End of image description. Label: ComparisonGroupLegend,Shape Label: Comparison Group Median ComparisonGroupLegendLine1,Shape Label: ComparisonGroupLegendLine2,End of image description. Label: Graduation rate, 16 overall (N=10) 14 4 Normal time 8 Transfer-out rate 28 (N=9) 20

10 Graduation rate cohort 55 as a percent of total 150% of normal time 36 entering students (N=10) 13

Full-time retention 45 rate (N=10) 55 15 200% of normal time Part-time retention 48 20 rate (N=10) 49

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Percent Graduation rate

Your institution Comparison Group Median Your institution Comparison Group Median (N=9) NOTE: Graduation rate cohort includes all full-time, first-time, degree/certificate- NOTE: The 150% graduation rate is the Student Right-to-Know (SRK) rates; the seeking undergraduate students. Entering class includes all students coming to the Normal time and 200% rates are calculated using the same methodology. For more institution for the first time. Graduation and transfer-out rates are the Student Right- information see the Methodological Notes at the end of the report. N is the number to-Know rates. Only institutions with a mission to prepare students to transfer are of institutions in the comparison group. required to report transfers out. Retention rates are measured from the fall of first SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, enrollment to the following fall. For more information, see the Methodological Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS): Spring 2011, 200% Notes. N is the number of institutions in the comparison group. Graduation Rates component. SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS): Spring 2011, Graduation Rates component and Fall Enrollment component.

Tyler Junior College 5 IPEDS DATA FEEDBACK REPORT

Figure 12. Full-time equivalent staff, by assigned position: Fall 2010 Figure 13. Average salaries of full-time instructional staff equated to 9-month contracts, by academic rank: Academic year 2010-11

Image description. Image description. HorizontalStaff category Bar chart with 4 groups with 2 items per group. HorizontalAcademic rankBar chart with 7 groups with 2 items per group. GroupX scale 1, titled Instruction/ Number research/of staff. public service. GroupX scale 1, titled All ranks Average (N=10). salary. Item 2,1, ComparisonYour institution Group 405. Median (N=10) 324. Item 2,1, ComparisonYour institution Group $49450. Median $51784. ItemGroup 1, 2,Your Executive/ institution administrative/ 68. managerial. ItemGroup 1, 2,Your Professor institution (N=7). No data. GroupItem 2, 3, Comparison Other professional Group Median (support/service). (N=10) 40. GroupItem 2, 3, Comparison Associate professorGroup Median (N=5). $59395. Item 2,1, ComparisonYour institution Group 124. Median (N=10) 95. Item 2,1, ComparisonYour institution Group No data.Median $55301. ItemGroup 1, 4,Your Non-professional. institution 189. ItemGroup 1, 4,Your Assistant institution professor No data. (N=5). Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=10)Staff 271. category GroupItem 2, 5, Comparison Instructor (N=6).Group Median $50443.Academic rank line, Shape Label: Item 2,1, ComparisonYour institution Group $49450. Median $45814. InstitutionLegend, Shape Label: Your institution ItemGroup 1, 6,Your Lecturer institution (N=0). No data. ComparisonGroupLegend, Shape Label: Comparison Group Median (N=10) GroupItem 2, 7, Comparison No academic Group rank Median (N=2). No data. ComparisonGroupLegendLine1, Shape Label: Item 2,1, ComparisonYour institution Group No data.Median No data. ComparisonGroupLegendLine2, Shape Label: Shape End of image description. line,Shape Label: InstitutionLegend,Shape Label: Your institution ComparisonGroupLegend,Shape Label: Comparison Group Median ComparisonGroupLegendLine1,Shape Label: ComparisonGroupLegendLine2,End of image description. AllLabel: ranks $49,450 Instruction/ 405 (N=10) $51,784 research/ public service 324 Professor (N=7) $59,395

Executive/ 68 Associate professor administrative/ (N=5) $55,301 managerial 40 Assistant professor (N=5) $50,443 Other professional 124 Instructor $49,450 (support/service) 95 (N=6) $45,814

Lecturer (N=0) 189 Non-professional 271 No academic rank (N=2)

0 100 200 300 400 500 $0 $10,000 $20,000 $30,000 $40,000 $50,000 $60,000 Number of staff Average salary Your institution Comparison Group Median (N=10) Your institution Comparison Group Median NOTE: Graduate assistants are not included in this figure. For information on the NOTE: Average full-time instructional staff salaries for 11/12-month contracts were calculation of FTE of staff, see the Methodological Notes. N is the number of equated to 9-month average salaries by multiplying the 11/12-month salary by .8182. institutions in the comparison group. Salaries based on less than 9-month contracts are not included. Medical school SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, salaries are not included. N is the number of institutions in the comparison Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS): Winter 2010-11, Human group. Medians are not reported for comparison groups with less than three values. Resources component. SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS): Winter 2010-11, Human Resources component.

Figure 14. Percent distribution of core revenues, by source: Fiscal Figure 15. Core expenses per FTE enrollment, by function: Fiscal year 2010 year 2010

Image description. Image description. HorizontalRevenue source Bar chart with 7 groups with 2 items per group. HorizontalExpense function Bar chart with 7 groups with 2 items per group. GroupX scale 1, titled Tuition Percent. and fees. GroupX scale 1, titled Instruction. Dollars per FTE. Item 2,1, ComparisonYour institution Group 18. Median (N=10) 17. Item 2,1, ComparisonYour institution Group $4049. Median (N=10) $3669. ItemGroup 1, 2,Your State institution appropriations. 29. ItemGroup 1, 2,Your Research. institution $0.01. GroupItem 2, 3, Comparison Local appropriations. Group Median (N=10) 27. GroupItem 2, 3, Comparison Public service. Group Median (N=10) $0.01. Item 2,1, ComparisonYour institution Group 19. Median (N=10) 17. Item 2,1, ComparisonYour institution Group $163. Median (N=10) $133. ItemGroup 1, 4,Your Government institution grants29. and contracts. ItemGroup 1, 4,Your Academic institution support. $408. GroupItem 2, 5, Comparison Private gifts, Group grants, Median and contracts. (N=10)Revenue 34. source GroupItem 2, 5, Comparison Institutional Group support. Median (N=10) $613.Expense function Item 2,1, ComparisonYour institution Group 1. Median (N=10) 1. Item 2,1, ComparisonYour institution Group $1383. Median (N=10) $1209. ItemGroup 1, 6,Your Investment institution return. 0.01. ItemGroup 1, 6,Your Student institution services. $1193. GroupItem 2, 7, Comparison Other core Grouprevenues. Median (N=10) 0.01. GroupItem 2, 7, Comparison Other core Groupexpenses. Median (N=10) $703. Item 2,1, ComparisonYour institution Group 3. Median (N=10) 2. Item 2,1, ComparisonYour institution Group $327. Median (N=10) $2011. Shape Shape line,Shape Label: line,Shape Label: InstitutionLegend,Shape Label: Your institution InstitutionLegend,Shape Label: Your institution ComparisonGroupLegend,Shape Label: Comparison Group Median (N=10) ComparisonGroupLegend,Shape Label: Comparison Group Median (N=10) ComparisonGroupLegendLine1,Shape Label: ComparisonGroupLegendLine1,Shape Label: ComparisonGroupLegendLine2,End of image description. Label: ComparisonGroupLegendLine2,End of image description. Label: $4,049 Tuition and fees 18 Instruction 17 $3,669

State $0 29 Research appropriations 27 $0

Local $163 19 Public service appropriations 17 $133

Government grants $408 29 Academic support and contracts 34 $613

Private gifts, grants, $1,383 1 Institutional support and contracts 1 $1,209

$1,193 Investment return 0 Student services 0 $703

Other core 3 Other core $327 revenues 2 expenses $2,011

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 $0 $1,000 $2,000 $3,000 $4,000 $5,000 Percent Dollars per FTE

Your institution Comparison Group Median (N=10) Your institution Comparison Group Median (N=10) NOTE: The comparison group median is based on those members of the NOTE: The comparison group median is based on those members of the comparison group that report finance data using the same accounting standards as comparison group that report finance data using the same accounting standards as the comparison institution. For a detailed definition of core revenues, see the the comparison institution. Expenses per full-time equivalent (FTE) enrollment, Methodological Notes. N is the number of institutions in the comparison group. particularly instruction, may be inflated because finance data includes all core SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, expenses while FTE reflects credit activity only. For details on calculating FTE Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS): Spring 2011, Finance enrollment and a detailed definition of core expenses, see the Methodological component. Notes. N is the number of institutions in the comparison group. SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS): Fall 2010, 12-month Enrollment component and Spring 2011, Finance component.

Tyler Junior College 6 IPEDS DATA FEEDBACK REPORT

METHODOLOGICAL NOTES

Overview Cohort Determination for Reporting Student Financial Aid and Graduation Rates This report is based on data supplied by institutions to IPEDS during the 2010-11 survey year. Response rates exceeded 99 percent for most Student cohorts for reporting Student Financial Aid and Graduation Rates surveys. Detailed response tables are included in IPEDS First Look reports, data are based on the reporting type of the institution. For institutions that which can be found at report based on an academic year (those operating on standard academic http://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/getpubcats.asp?sid=010. terms), student counts and cohorts are based on fall term data. Student counts and cohorts for program reporters (those that do not operate on Use of Median Values for Comparison Group standard academic terms) are based on unduplicated counts of students enrolled during a full 12-month period.

The value for the comparison institution is compared to the median value for the comparison group for each statistic included in the figure. If more Description of Statistics Used in the Figures than one statistic is presented in a figure, the median values are determined separately for each indicator or statistic. Medians are not Average Institutional Net Price reported for comparison groups with less than three values. Where percentage distributions are presented, median values may not add to 100 percent. Through the ExPT, users have access to all of the data used to Average net price is calculated for full-time, first-time degree/certificate- create the figures included in this report. seeking undergraduates who were awarded grant or scholarship aid from the federal government, state/local government, or the institution anytime during the full aid year. For public institutions, this includes only students Missing Statistics who paid the in-state or in-district tuition rate. Other sources of grant aid are excluded. Average net price is generated by subtracting the average amount of federal, state/local government, and institutional grant and If a statistic is not reported for your institution, the omission indicates that scholarship aid from the total cost of attendance. Total cost of attendance the statistic is not relevant to your institution and the data were not is the sum of published tuition and required fees, books and supplies, and collected. As such, not all notes listed below may be applicable to your the weighted average room and board and other expenses. report.

For the purpose of the IPEDS reporting, aid received refers to financial aid Use of Imputed Data that was awarded to, and accepted by, a student. This amount may differ from the aid amount that is disbursed to a student. All IPEDS data are subject to imputation for total (institutional) and partial (item) nonresponse. If necessary, imputed values were used to prepare Core Expenses your report. Core expenses include expenses for instruction, research, public service, Data Confidentiality academic support, institutional support, student services, scholarships and fellowships (reported under FASB standards as net grant aid to students), and other expenses. Expenses for operation and maintenance of plant, IPEDS data are not collected under a pledge of confidentiality. depreciation, and interest are allocated to each of the other functions. Core expenses exclude expenses for auxiliary enterprises (e.g., bookstores, dormitories), hospitals, and independent operations. Disaggregation of Data by Race/Ethnicity Core Revenues When applicable, some statistics are disaggregated by race/ethnicity. Data disaggregated by race/ethnicity have been reported using the 1997 (new) Core revenues for public institutions reporting under GASB standards Office of Management and Budget categories. Detailed information about include tuition and fees; government appropriations (federal, state, and the recent race/ethnicity changes can be found at local); government grants and contracts; private gifts, grants, and http://nces.ed.gov/ipeds/reic/resource.asp. contracts; sales and services of educational activities; investment income; other operating and non-operating sources; and other revenues and Postbaccalaureate Degree Categories additions (capital appropriations and grants and additions to permanent endowments). Core revenues for private, not-for-profit institutions (and a small number of public institutions) reporting under FASB include tuition The use of new postbaccalaureate degree categories was mandatory in the and fees; government appropriations (federal, state, and local); 2010-11 collection year. These categories are: doctor’s degree- government grants and contracts; private gifts, grants, and contracts research/scholarship, doctor’s degree-professional practice, and doctor’s (including contributions from affiliated entities); investment return; sales degree-other. (The first-professional degree and certificate categories and and services of educational activities; and other sources. Core revenues the single doctor’s degree category have been eliminated.) for private, for-profit institutions reporting under FASB standards include tuition and fees; government appropriations (federal, state, and local); government grants and contracts; private grants and contracts; net investment income; sales and services of educational activities; and other sources. In general, core revenues exclude revenues from auxiliary enterprises (e.g., bookstores, dormitories), hospitals, and independent operations.

Tyler Junior College 7 IPEDS DATA FEEDBACK REPORT

Equated Instructional Staff Salaries regardless of the duration of service, and amounts made to or on behalf of an individual over and above that received in the form of a salary or wage. Total salary outlays for full-time instructional staff on 11/12-month Frequently, benefits are associated with an insurance payment. Private, for- contracts were equated to 9-month outlays by multiplying the outlay for profit institutions under FASB standards do not report salaries. 11/12-month contracted instructional staff by 0.8182. The equated outlays were then added to the outlays for 9/10-month instructional staff to Total Entering Undergraduate Students determine an average salary for each rank. Salaries are not included for medical school staff or staff on less-than-9-month contracts. Total entering students are students at the undergraduate level, both full- and part-time, new to the institution in the fall term (or the prior summer FTE for Enrollment term who returned in the fall). This includes all first-time undergraduate students, students transferring into the institution at the undergraduate The full-time equivalent (FTE) enrollment used in this report is the sum of level, and nondegree/certificate-seeking undergraduates entering in the fall. the institution’s FTE undergraduate enrollment and FTE graduate Only degree-granting, academic year reporting institutions provide total enrollment (as calculated from or reported on the 12-month Enrollment entering student data. component). Undergraduate and graduate FTE are estimated using 12- month instructional activity (credit and/or contact hours). See “Calculation Tuition and Required Fees of FTE Students (using instructional activity)” in the IPEDS Glossary at http://nces.ed.gov/ipeds/glossary/. Tuition is defined as the amount of money charged to students for instructional services; required fees are those fixed sum charges to FTE for Staff students for items not covered by tuition that are required of such a large proportion of all students that the student who does not pay the charge is an The full-time equivalent (FTE) of staff is calculated by summing the total exception. The amounts used in this report are for full-time, first-time, number of full-time staff from the Employees by Assigned Position (EAP) degree/certificate-seeking undergraduates and are those used by the section of the Human Resources component and adding one-third of the financial aid office to determine need. For institutions that have differential total number of part-time staff. tuition rates for in-district or in-state students, the lowest tuition rate is used in the figure. Only institutions that operate on standard academic terms will have tuition figures included in their report. Graduation Rates and Transfer-out Rate

Graduation rates are those developed to satisfy the requirements of the Additional Methodological Information Student Right-to-Know and Higher Education Opportunity Acts and are defined as the total number of individuals from a given cohort of full-time, Additional methodological information on the IPEDS components can be first-time, degree/certificate-seeking undergraduates who completed a found in the publications available at degree or certificate within a given percent of normal time (for the degree http://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/getpubcats.asp?sid=010. or certificate) before the ending status date of August 31, 2010, divided by Additional definitions of variables used in this report can be found in the the entire cohort of full-time, first-time, degree/certificate-seeking IPEDS online glossary available at http://nces.ed.gov/ipeds/glossary/. undergraduates minus any allowable exclusions. Institutions are permitted to exclude from the initial cohort students who died or were totally and permanently disabled; those who left school to serve in the armed forces or were called to active duty; those who left to serve with a foreign aid service of the federal government, such as the Peace Corps; and those who left to serve on an official church mission. Transfer-out rate is the total number of students from the cohort who are known to have transferred out of the reporting institution within the same time period, divided by the same adjusted cohort. Only institutions with a mission that includes preparing students to transfer are required to report transfers out.

Retention Rates

Full-time retention rates are defined as the number of full-time, first-time, degree/certificate-seeking undergraduate students who enter the institution for the first time in the fall and who return to the same institution the following fall (as either full- or part-time), divided by the total number of full- time, first-time, degree/certificate-seeking undergraduates in the fall of first entrance. Part-time retention rates are similarly defined. For 4-year Mike Metke, President institutions offering a bachelor’s degree, this rate is reported only for those Tyler Junior College (ID: 229355) first-time students seeking a bachelor’s degree. For less than 4-year institutions, the rate is calculated for all first-time degree/certificate-seeking PO Box 9020 students. Tyler, TX 75711-9020

Salaries, Wages, and Benefits

Salaries, wages, and benefits, for public institutions under GASB standards, and private, not-for-profit institutions under FASB standards, include amounts paid as compensation for services to all employees

Tyler Junior College