Introduction

Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-47071-1 — Roman Architecture and Urbanism Fikret Yegül , Diane Favro Excerpt More Information INTRODUCTION THE QUESTION OF ROMANIZATION – TO BE OR NOT TO- BE (ROMAN)? Few issues in current Roman scholarship proved more process is faintly suspect and misleading; it fails to engaging and enduring (and occasionally controversial represent the other side in the process of acculturation. and disruptive) than the discourse on Romanization. In a world in which we celebrate and cherish our The perception of being Roman, or not being Roman, differences, the goal of eroding the individual or tribal in a world that was dominated or at least administered culture in order to consolidate unity appears anything by the Roman state is a question of central importance from insensitive to oppressive. It becomes all the more to all aspects of Roman Studies in art, architecture, so when the attempt of “making Roman” was imposed literature, and history. The concept not only opens the on a group, as it often was, as a result of military door for politically relevant discourse on the nature of conquest. This was clearly the view expressed by cultural and national identities, it also defines the way Calgacus, the Briton chieftain, when he lashed out that we look at art and architecture made by groups against the Roman armies conquering Britain: with different identities, Roman or other. It seems opportune to add our voice to the chorus here in a Robbers of the world, now that their universal generalized and introductory way to offer an overview, plunder exhausted the land, they rifle even the sea. although this subject will come up in the following If the enemy be rich, they are rapacious; if he be chapters linked to specific historical or regional con- poor, they lust for his country. Neither the East nor the West has been able to satisfy their lust. Alone texts where it will be discussed further (see the collec- among mankind they covet with equal glut poverty tion of essays in Mattingly 1997, esp. 7–24; also – – and riches. To plunder, robbery, slaughter they Barrett, 51 64). misname as empire; they make desolation and call A state that ruled from Syria to Scotland, that it peace. called the entire Mediterranean its own, and that (excerpts from Tacitus, Agricola 30) organized and urbanized vast communities of peoples of different religions, languages, and backgrounds is One can add many more unfortunate and tragic conse- bound to attract considerable criticism, both ancient quences of military conquest and occupation by the and modern. This is particularly true in our own day expanding empire – loss of life, property, liberty, when our more liberal sensibilities find world empires identity, and the sad acceptance by the subjects of a and colonial practices distasteful and disdainful, sense of inferiority. Not just the Britons of Britain but although judgment often is based, inappropriately, on also the Marcomanni of Germany, Gauls of France and nineteenth-century models from the great era of West- Belgium, Berbers of Africa, Bedouins of Syria, and ern colonialism and imperialism. Of course the process nomads of everywhere had their tale of woe to tell – of becoming Romanized, has positive as well as nega- those resonate in our childhood memories of delightful tive connotations. To take the straightforward diction- stories of Asterix the Gaul and his brave friends fight- ary meaning of the word, Romanization is about ing and outsmarting Caesar’s cloddish legions. “making non-Romans Roman” or subjecting them to There are, however, many stories also that repre- the influence of Roman culture and technology. The sent Romans in a positive light. Roman conquest and 1 © in this web service Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-47071-1 — Roman Architecture and Urbanism Fikret Yegül , Diane Favro Excerpt More Information Roman Architecture and Urbanism: From the Origins to Late Antiquity presence often brought the advantages of peace and law, and civic structure into not perhaps a seamless prosperity to Romans and locals alike. In terms of whole but, instead, a reasonably harmonious integra- agriculture, there is hardly a land that did not enjoy tion and coexistence of the willing (“becoming Roman substantial increases in productivity under Roman and staying Greek,” borrowing an insightful expression administration as a result of Roman technological from G. Woolf, whose work generally illuminates know-how. In many cases, admittedly, this was in some of the negative consequences of Roman con- cooperation with local traditions. In an atmosphere quests: Woolf 1994, 116–143; see also Waelkens 2002, of expanding economy, hard-work promoted social 311–368; Yegül 2000, 133–153). Reorganization of land mobility. The rags-to-riches story of the Mactar and agriculture; creation of a network of good roads, Harvester, who started his life as a day-laborer and bridges, harbors, emporia; establishment of institutions ended it as a member of his local Senate – and proudly of justice, order, and security (while keeping the hard inscribed his tale on stone – may be an exception, but military in the background); encouragement of social it underscores what was possible (see later). In Timgad, mixing of the local élite with imported Roman popu- where an entire seminomadic city of local tribes grew lations; foundation and development of cities and around the orderly veteran’s colony, the opportunities urban structures to a fault – and, most cogently, to were shared by many, while allowing individual make all this possible, creation of a socially porous choices. In all of the provinces, intermarriage between society through the granting of Roman citizenship first Roman veterans and local aristocracy brought mutual to individuals, groups, and then to masses – were some benefits: the advantages of Roman citizenship to the of the key concerns of the multifarious agenda of what natives, and the acceptance into local high society and we call Romanization. wealth to the retired soldiers, who often came from While reflecting on the peace and prosperity of the unexceptional Italian backgrounds. countryside (where well-to-do urbanites could take It is true that evidence for rapacious soldiers and occasional refuge), Romans ultimately believed that tax collectors harassing villages is widespread. So is the civilization and civilized life were synonymous with evidence for the opposite: an unprivileged Jewish cities. They conquered vast territories, and for the widow in Judea (c. 130 ce) could seek her rights and most part strove to build cities to carry their civilizing ask for justice in a complex legal case by presenting mission, as they understood it, even in the farthest before the Roman judges a maze of documents going corners of their empire. Law, order, and applied tech- back in time half-a-century (the Babatha Archives, see nology were among the fundamental aspects of later in this book). A local governor of Syria would Romanization, but so too were the temples and basil- send a letter to a village in the Hauran offering protec- icas, markets and libraries, theaters and baths. “God tion against any wrongdoing by marauding soldiers and made the country, human art built the town,” Varro officials, encouraging them to stand up for their rights, wrote (De re rustica, 3.1), and that is the sense in which and would exhibit the decree in a public building for we best understand the essence of Romanization – as all to see. Imposing legal and administrative standards urbanization. And that is basically how Aelius across the land, offering unrestricted access to and Aristides, a Sophist from Smyrna in Asia Minor, must equal protection before law – privileges not many are have seen it: lucky to enjoy in our own world, especially in the lands where Babatha and her friends lived – were also what Neither does the sea nor the great expanse of land Romanization was about. keep one from being a citizen regardless of whether Romanization followed a complex scenario involv- it is Asia or Europe. All is open to all men. No one ing the play of numerous indigenous and imported is a foreigner who deserves to hold office or to be sources, a multidirectional process of integration, experi- trusted, but there has been established a common mentation, and exclusion across a large landscape. democracy of the world, under one man, the best ruler and leader, and all men assemble here as it were Especially in the Hellenized provinces of Greece, Asia at a common meeting place, each to obtain his due. Minor, and the eastern Mediterranean, it was far from What a city is to its boundaries and territories, so being a unilateral and deliberate imposition of the Rome is to the whole inhabited world, as if it had culture of the conqueror upon the conquered. Geog- been designated its common town. raphy mattered. Regarding the city of Sagalassus and (Aelius Aristides, Regarding Rome 26.60–2) the larger Pisidia as a “case study,” M. Waelkens offers a closely observed narrative of how the Roman con- These are powerful words. Aristides of Smyrna was quest of this remote region in southern Asia Minor as much a “foreigner” to Rome as Calgacus the Briton resulted in a gradual but steady amalgamation of Greek was, but his city and land were not under Roman and Roman traditions of administration, governance, attack. Furthermore, as mentioned earlier, the province 2 © in this web service Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-47071-1 — Roman Architecture and Urbanism Fikret Yegül , Diane Favro Excerpt More Information Roman Architecture and Urbanism: From the Origins to Late Antiquity of Asia, especially its western coast, was a special case invalid in order to substitute imperialism’s modern of Romanization in which the seller and the buyer connotations is to replace one cliché with another.

Load more