Clonal Analysis Reveals a Common Origin Between Nonsomite-Derived Neck Muscles and Heart Myocardium

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Clonal Analysis Reveals a Common Origin Between Nonsomite-Derived Neck Muscles and Heart Myocardium Clonal analysis reveals a common origin between nonsomite-derived neck muscles and heart myocardium Fabienne Lescroarta,1, Wissam Hamoua, Alexandre Francoub, Magali Théveniau-Ruissyb, Robert G. Kellyb, and Margaret Buckinghama,2 aUnité de Génétique Moléculaire du Développement, CNRS Unité de Recherche Associée 2578, Institut Pasteur, 75015 Paris, France; and bAix-Marseille Université, Institut de Biologie du Développement de Marseille, CNRS Unité Mixte de Recherche 7288, 13288 Marseille, France Contributed by Margaret Buckingham, December 23, 2014 (sent for review November 10, 2014; reviewed by Michael Levine and Drew Noden) Neck muscles constitute a transition zone between somite-derived Masticatory and facial expression muscles derive from the skeletal muscles of the trunk and limbs, and muscles of the head, mesodermal core that extends into the first and second branchial which derive from cranial mesoderm. The trapezius and sterno- (or pharyngeal) arches, respectively (11). These arches also con- cleidomastoid neck muscles are formed from progenitor cells that tain SHF cardiac progenitors (12). Cells with divergent cardiac have expressed markers of cranial pharyngeal mesoderm, whereas and skeletal muscle fates in this cardiopharyngeal mesoderm are other muscles in the neck arise from Pax3-expressing cells in the similarly labeled by genetic tracing (13). Furthermore, retrospec- somites. Mef2c-AHF-Cre genetic tracing experiments and Tbx1 mu- tive clonal analysis in the mouse embryo has shown that masti- tant analysis show that nonsomitic neck muscles share a gene catory muscles of the head and right ventricular myocardium regulatory network with cardiac progenitor cells in pharyngeal me- originate from common progenitor cells, whereas facial expres- soderm of the second heart field (SHF) and branchial arch-derived sion muscles share a common clonal origin with the arterial pole head muscles. Retrospective clonal analysis shows that this group of the heart, such that myocardium at the base of the pulmonary of neck muscles includes laryngeal muscles and a component of the trunk or the aorta is clonally related to left or right facial ex- splenius muscle, of mixed somitic and nonsomitic origin. We dem- pression muscles, respectively (14). Cardiopharyngeal mesoderm onstrate that the trapezius muscle group is clonally related to myo- cells that give rise to both cardiac and skeletal muscle derivatives cardium at the venous pole of the heart, which derives from the are already present in urochordates, such as the ascidian Ciona posterior SHF. The left clonal sublineage includes myocardium of intestinalis, where the equivalent of an SHF can be distinguished the pulmonary trunk at the arterial pole of the heart. Although (15). A number of genes, including homologs of vertebrate Islet1 muscles derived from the first and second branchial arches also and Tbx1, are expressed in ascidian cardiopharyngeal mesoderm share a clonal relationship with different SHF-derived parts of the and form a gene regulatory network that governs both heart and heart, neck muscles are clonally distinct from these muscles and pharyngeal muscle formation (16, 17). define a third clonal population of common skeletal and cardiac Muscles of the neck play an essential role in coordination of muscle progenitor cells within cardiopharyngeal mesoderm. By link- movement between the head and trunk. In this transition zone, ing neck muscle and heart development, our findings highlight the muscles of both branchial and somitic origin are found. Myo- importance of cardiopharyngeal mesoderm in the evolution of the blasts in the more caudal branchial arches (3rd, 4th, and 6th) are vertebrate heart and neck and in the pathophysiology of human thought to give rise to neck muscles such as the cucullaris muscle, congenital disease. neck muscles | myocardium | retrospective clonal analysis | mouse embryo | Tbx1 Significance n mammals, all skeletal muscles are not equivalent. Entry into Head muscles, derived from the first and second pharyngeal Ithe skeletal muscle program and subsequent differentiation arches, share common progenitors with myocardial cells of the depend on transcription factors of the MyoD (myogenic differ- heart. This is in contrast to somite-derived skeletal muscles of the trunk and limbs. Neck muscles, located in the transition zone entiation 1) family. However, upstream regulators of the myo- between head and trunk, have both a somitic and nonsomitic genic program differ in different parts of the body. Skeletal origin. We now demonstrate a clonal relationship between muscles of the trunk and limbs derive from the somites and thus nonsomitic neck muscles and myocardial cells located in the are descendants of progenitors expressing Pax3, a paired box atria, inflow and outflow regions of the heart. This is distinct transcription factor that plays a major role in the control of −/− −/− from that of the two head muscle lineages. Formation of these myogenesis (1, 2). In Pax3 ;Myf5 double mutants most neck muscles, like those in the head, depends on a gene regu- skeletal muscles are lost. However, muscles in the cranial part of latory network shared with myocardial progenitors. We thus the embryo are not affected in these mutant mice (3), showing identify a third clonal group within cardiopharyngeal meso- that myogenesis in head skeletal muscles is controlled by a dif- derm, with implications for human malformations. ferent upstream genetic network (2). Indeed, head muscles are − + formed from cranial mesoderm, derived from Pax3 ;Mesp1 Author contributions: F.L. and M.B. designed research; F.L., W.H., A.F., and M.T.-R. per- (mesoderm posterior homolog transcription factor 1) cells (4, 5). formed research; F.L., R.G.K., and M.B. analyzed data; and F.L., R.G.K., and M.B. wrote the paper. Many of these myogenic progenitors express genes, including Islet1 (Isl1 transcription factor), Nkx2-5,orTbx1 (T-box tran- Reviewers: M.L., University of California Berkeley; and D.N., Cornell University. scription factor 1), that are also expressed in cardiac progenitor The authors declare no conflict of interest. 1 cells of the second heart field (SHF) within pharyngeal meso- Present address: Institut de Recherche Interdisciplinaire en Biologie Humaine et Moléculaire, Université Libre de Bruxelles, B61070, Belgium. derm populations that form myocardium at the poles of the heart 2To whom correspondence should be addressed. Email: margaret.buckingham@ (6, 7). Among these regulators, Tbx1 is required for development pasteur.fr. of both the arterial pole of the heart and head muscle specifi- This article contains supporting information online at www.pnas.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10. cation (8–10). 1073/pnas.1424538112/-/DCSupplemental. 1446–1451 | PNAS | February 3, 2015 | vol. 112 | no. 5 www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.1424538112 Downloaded by guest on September 27, 2021 or its mammalian derivatives the trapezius and sternocleido- some neck muscles, including the trapezius and sternocleido- mastoidius, which, in keeping with a branchial origin, are in- mastoid muscles, are labeled (Fig. 1 C and D). The Mef2c nervated by a cranial nerve (18). Recent analysis of gene (myocyte enhancer factor 2c) enhancer is activated in the ante- expression and genetic tracing supports this view. The cucullaris rior SHF (21), and when Mef2c-Cre transgenic mice are crossed R-nlacZ/+ muscle in birds and turtles derives from cells in adjacent lateral with the Rosa26 reporter line, labeling is seen in head mesoderm that do not express Pax3 but express Tbx1 (19). De- muscles, notably those derived from the first branchial arch (14), spite evolutionary changes in cranial somites, this is also the case as well as in myocardium of the pulmonary trunk, aorta, and right for the progenitors of the trapezius and sternocleidomastoid ventricle. The trapezius and sternocleidomastoid muscles are also muscles in the mouse (19), where progenitors were also shown to labeled using this Cre line, as shown for the trapezius muscles on have expressed Islet1. Furthermore the trapezius muscle is missing whole-mount X-gal–stained embryos at embryonic day (E)14.5 in Tbx1 mutants (10, 19), consistent with an origin in cranial me- and E12.5 (Fig. 1 E and F). At E10.5 (Fig. 1G), labeling can be soderm rather than somites, in the mouse embryo. observed in the posterior pharyngeal region, where trapezius Here we address the question of a link between nonsomite- progenitors are potentially present. In keeping with this, these derived neck muscles and the myocardium. Using genetic tracing cells also express MyoD, indicating commitment to the skeletal in WT and Tbx1 mutant embryos and retrospective clonal anal- muscle lineage (1) (Fig. 1H). These results show that progenitors ysis, we characterize such muscles and show that neck muscle of nonsomitic neck muscles express common markers with, and progenitor cells share a common clonal origin with the venous originate in close proximity to, cardiac progenitors. pole of the heart. Our results identify a third common skeletal and cardiac progenitor population in cardiopharyngeal meso- No Clonal Relation with Head or Somite-Derived Muscles. To inves- derm, and we discuss the importance of this tissue in the evo- tigate a potential clonal relationship between these neck muscles, lution of the vertebrate heart and head/neck and the implications muscles derived from the first and second branchial arches, and for human pathology. somite-derived muscles of the neck and body, we performed
Recommended publications
  • C.V. De Margaret Buckingham, Membre De L'académie Des Sciences
    Margaret Buckingham Élue Membre le 29 novembre 2005 dans la section Biologie intégrative Directeur de recherche au CNRS, Professeur à l'Institut Pasteur Œuvre scientifique Margaret Buckingham, de nationalités française et britannique, née en 1945, est diplômée (B.A., M.A., D. Phil.) de l’université d’Oxford. Depuis 1971, elle a mené sa carrière scientifique en France, d’abord dans le laboratoire de François Gros, puis à partir de 1987, en tant que chef de l’Unité de génétique moléculaire du développement, puis Professeur à l’Institut Pasteur où elle a été directrice du Département de biologie du développement. Elle est directeur de recherche au CNRS. Elle a présidé la section de Biologie du développement et de la reproduction au CNRS de 2001 à 2004 et la Société Française de Biologie du Développement de 2008 à 2011. Elle est actuellement membre du Comité Consultatif National d’Ethique (CCNE). Les recherches de Margaret Buckingham portent sur les mécanismes qui conduisent une cellule naïve à entrer dans un programme de différenciation tissulaire pendant le développement de l’organisme. Elle étudie les gènes qui régulent la formation et la régénération du muscle de squelette, ainsi que les populations cellulaires qui forment le cœur. Margaret Buckingham a effectué des études pionnières sur l’organisation des gènes du muscle et leurs différents modes d’expression pendant le développement. Parmi les gènes des facteurs de régulation myogénique, de la famille MyoD, l’expression de Myf5 précède la myogenèse chez l’embryon. En son absence, les cellules adoptent d’autres destins cellulaires, démontrant ainsi le rôle de Myf5 comme facteur de détermination myogénique.
    [Show full text]
  • Female Fellows of the Royal Society
    Female Fellows of the Royal Society Professor Jan Anderson FRS [1996] Professor Ruth Lynden-Bell FRS [2006] Professor Judith Armitage FRS [2013] Dr Mary Lyon FRS [1973] Professor Frances Ashcroft FMedSci FRS [1999] Professor Georgina Mace CBE FRS [2002] Professor Gillian Bates FMedSci FRS [2007] Professor Trudy Mackay FRS [2006] Professor Jean Beggs CBE FRS [1998] Professor Enid MacRobbie FRS [1991] Dame Jocelyn Bell Burnell DBE FRS [2003] Dr Philippa Marrack FMedSci FRS [1997] Dame Valerie Beral DBE FMedSci FRS [2006] Professor Dusa McDuff FRS [1994] Dr Mariann Bienz FMedSci FRS [2003] Professor Angela McLean FRS [2009] Professor Elizabeth Blackburn AC FRS [1992] Professor Anne Mills FMedSci FRS [2013] Professor Andrea Brand FMedSci FRS [2010] Professor Brenda Milner CC FRS [1979] Professor Eleanor Burbidge FRS [1964] Dr Anne O'Garra FMedSci FRS [2008] Professor Eleanor Campbell FRS [2010] Dame Bridget Ogilvie AC DBE FMedSci FRS [2003] Professor Doreen Cantrell FMedSci FRS [2011] Baroness Onora O'Neill * CBE FBA FMedSci FRS [2007] Professor Lorna Casselton CBE FRS [1999] Dame Linda Partridge DBE FMedSci FRS [1996] Professor Deborah Charlesworth FRS [2005] Dr Barbara Pearse FRS [1988] Professor Jennifer Clack FRS [2009] Professor Fiona Powrie FRS [2011] Professor Nicola Clayton FRS [2010] Professor Susan Rees FRS [2002] Professor Suzanne Cory AC FRS [1992] Professor Daniela Rhodes FRS [2007] Dame Kay Davies DBE FMedSci FRS [2003] Professor Elizabeth Robertson FRS [2003] Professor Caroline Dean OBE FRS [2004] Dame Carol Robinson DBE FMedSci
    [Show full text]
  • EMBO Conference Takes to the Sea Life Sciences in Portugal
    SUMMER 2013 ISSUE 24 encounters page 3 page 7 Life sciences in Portugal The limits of privacy page 8 EMBO Conference takes to the sea EDITORIAL Maria Leptin, Director of EMBO, INTERVIEW EMBO Associate Member Tom SPOTLIGHT Read about how the EMBO discusses the San Francisco Declaration Cech shares his views on science in Europe and Courses & Workshops Programme funds on Research Assessment and some of the describes some recent productive collisions. meetings for life scientists in Europe. concerns about Journal Impact Factors. PAGE 2 PAGE 5 PAGE 9 www.embo.org COMMENTARY INSIDE SCIENTIFIC PUBLISHING panels have to evaluate more than a hundred The San Francisco Declaration on applicants to establish a short list for in-depth assessment, they cannot be expected to form their views by reading the original publications Research Assessment of all of the applicants. I believe that the quality of the journal in More than 7000 scientists and 250 science organizations have by now put which research is published can, in principle, their names to a joint statement called the San Francisco Declaration on be used for assessment because it reflects how the expert community who is most competent Research Assessment (DORA; am.ascb.org/dora). The declaration calls to judge it views the science. There has always on the world’s scientific community to avoid misusing the Journal Impact been a prestige factor associated with the publi- Factor in evaluating research for funding, hiring, promotion, or institutional cation of papers in certain journals even before the impact factor existed. This prestige is in many effectiveness.
    [Show full text]
  • Margaret Buckingham, Discoveries in Skeletal and Cardiac Muscle Development, Elected to the National Academy of Science Michael a Rudnicki*
    Rudnicki Skeletal Muscle 2012, 2:12 http://www.skeletalmusclejournal.com/content/2/1/12 Skeletal Muscle COMMENT Open Access Margaret Buckingham, discoveries in skeletal and cardiac muscle development, elected to the National Academy of Science Michael A Rudnicki* Abstract Margaret Buckingham was presented as a newly elected member to the National Academy of Sciences on 28 April 2012. Over the course of her career, Dr Buckingham made many seminal contributions to the understanding of skeletal muscle and cardiac development. Her studies on cardiac progenitor populations has provided insight into understanding heart malformations, while her work on skeletal muscle progenitors has elucidated their embryonic origins and the transcriptional hierarchies controlling their developmental progression. Keywords: National Academy of Sciences, Cardiac development, Skeletal muscle development Commentary Her work on cardiac progenitor populations is of clinical Dr Margaret Buckingham, a much-respected investigator importance in understanding heart malformations. who has made many significant contributions to our Dr Buckingham has also made major contributions to understanding of skeletal muscle and cardiac develop- the molecular genetic analysis of skeletal muscle devel- ment, was elected to the National Academy of Sciences in opment. She was the first to analyze expression of the 2011 and presented on 28 April, 2012. Dr Buckingham is myogenic regulatory factors of the MyoD family during Professor in the Department of Developmental Biology at mouse embryogenesis [9] and the behavior of cells in the the Pasteur Institute in Paris. She has been awarded many absence of Myf5 [10]. prestigious distinctions including that of Officier de la Lé- Her more recent work demonstrated that skeletal gion d’Honneur and Officier de l'Ordre National du Mér- muscle growth depends on a somite-derived population of ite, to name but two.
    [Show full text]
  • PROGRAMME & Book of Abstracts
    PROGRAMME & book of abstracts “. MOVING FORWARD TOGETHER” www.EDBC2019Alicante.com ORGANISED BY CONTENTS SPONSORS & COLLABORATORS ORGANIZATION .......................................................................... 4 GENERAL INFORMATION ......................................................... 5 INSTRUCTIONS FOR SPEAKERS AND AUTHORS ................ 8 CONGRESS TIMETABLE ............................................................ 9 SCIENTIFIC PROGRAMME WEDNESDAY 23 .................................................................... 12 THURSDAY 24 ........................................................................ 13 FRIDAY 25 ............................................................................... 16 SATURDAY 26 ........................................................................ 19 POSTER SESSIONS ................................................................... 21 EXHIBITORS AND SPONSORS ................................................ 48 ABSTRACTS ................................................................................ 51 AUTHORS’ INDEX ...................................................................... 263 4 EDBC2019 EDBC2019 5 ORGANIZATION GENERAL INFORMATION ORGANIZING COMMITTEE INVITED SPEAKERS VENUE Ángela Nieto. Alicante Enrique Amaya. Manchester Auditorio de la Diputación de Alicante - ADDA Víctor Borrell. Alicante Detlev Arendt. Heidelberg Paseo Campoamor, s/n Sergio Casas-Tintó. Madrid Laure Bally Cuif. Paris 03010 Alicante, Spain Pilar Cubas. Madrid Fernando Casares. Sevilla www.addaalicante.es
    [Show full text]
  • Cardiac Cell Lineages That Form the Heart
    This is a free sample of content from The Biology of Heart Disease. Click here for more information on how to buy the book. Cardiac Cell Lineages that Form the Heart Sigole` ne M. Meilhac1, Fabienne Lescroart2,Ce´ dric Blanpain2,3, and Margaret E. Buckingham1 1Institut Pasteur, Department of Developmental and Stem Cell Biology, CNRS URA2578, 75015 Paris, France 2Universite´ Libre de Bruxelles, IRIBHM, Brussels B-1070, Belgium 3WELBIO, Universite´ Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels B-1070, Belgium Correspondence: [email protected]; [email protected] Myocardial cells ensure the contractility of the heart, which also depends on other meso- dermal cell types for its function. Embryological experiments had identified the sources of cardiac precursorcells. With the advent of genetic engineering, novel tools have been used to reconstruct the lineage tree of cardiac cells that contribute to different parts of the heart, map the development of cardiac regions, and characterize their genetic signature. Such knowl- edge is of fundamental importance for our understanding of cardiogenesis and also for the diagnosis and treatment of heart malformations. he sources of cells that form the different tracing experiments based on the engineered Tparts of the heart and their relationships to temporal and spatial expression of a reporter each other are of major fundamental interest gene in different cardiac progenitors and their for understanding cardiogenesis. They are also descendants, with the mouse as the principal of biomedical significance in the context of model system. congenital heart malformations and for future therapeutic approaches to cardiac malfunction SOURCES OF CARDIAC CELLS IN THE based on stem cell therapies.
    [Show full text]
  • Smutty Alchemy
    University of Calgary PRISM: University of Calgary's Digital Repository Graduate Studies The Vault: Electronic Theses and Dissertations 2021-01-18 Smutty Alchemy Smith, Mallory E. Land Smith, M. E. L. (2021). Smutty Alchemy (Unpublished doctoral thesis). University of Calgary, Calgary, AB. http://hdl.handle.net/1880/113019 doctoral thesis University of Calgary graduate students retain copyright ownership and moral rights for their thesis. You may use this material in any way that is permitted by the Copyright Act or through licensing that has been assigned to the document. For uses that are not allowable under copyright legislation or licensing, you are required to seek permission. Downloaded from PRISM: https://prism.ucalgary.ca UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY Smutty Alchemy by Mallory E. Land Smith A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES IN PARTIAL FULFILMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY GRADUATE PROGRAM IN ENGLISH CALGARY, ALBERTA JANUARY, 2021 © Mallory E. Land Smith 2021 MELS ii Abstract Sina Queyras, in the essay “Lyric Conceptualism: A Manifesto in Progress,” describes the Lyric Conceptualist as a poet capable of recognizing the effects of disparate movements and employing a variety of lyric, conceptual, and language poetry techniques to continue to innovate in poetry without dismissing the work of other schools of poetic thought. Queyras sees the lyric conceptualist as an artistic curator who collects, modifies, selects, synthesizes, and adapts, to create verse that is both conceptual and accessible, using relevant materials and techniques from the past and present. This dissertation responds to Queyras’s idea with a collection of original poems in the lyric conceptualist mode, supported by a critical exegesis of that work.
    [Show full text]
  • Muscle Coding Sequences and Their Regulation During Myogenesis : Cloning of Muscle Actin Cdna Probes A
    Muscle coding sequences and their regulation during myogenesis : cloning of muscle actin cDNA probes A. Minty, M. Caravatti, B. Robert, Arlette Cohen, P. Daubas, A. Weydert, F. Gros, Margaret Buckingham To cite this version: A. Minty, M. Caravatti, B. Robert, Arlette Cohen, P. Daubas, et al.. Muscle coding sequences and their regulation during myogenesis : cloning of muscle actin cDNA probes. Reproduction Nutrition Développement, 1981, 21 (2), pp.247-255. hal-00897814 HAL Id: hal-00897814 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00897814 Submitted on 1 Jan 1981 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Muscle coding sequences and their regulation during myogenesis : cloning of muscle actin cDNA probes A. MINTY M. CARAVATTI, B. ROBERT, Arlette COHEN P. DAUBAS A. WEY- DERT F. GROS Margaret BUCKINGHAM Département de Biologie moléculaire, Institut Pasteur 25, rue du Dr. Roux, 75724 Paris Cedex. Summary. For a number of years our group has been mainly interested in the regulation of muscle gene expression during myogenesis. Using primary cultures and cell lines we have tried to find out whether the coding sequences for muscle proteins are already present in an unexpressed form or if there is a transcriptional switch at the onset of differentiation.
    [Show full text]
  • Directory 2016/17 the Royal Society of Edinburgh
    cover_cover2013 19/04/2016 16:52 Page 1 The Royal Society of Edinburgh T h e R o Directory 2016/17 y a l S o c i e t y o f E d i n b u r g h D i r e c t o r y 2 0 1 6 / 1 7 Printed in Great Britain by Henry Ling Limited, Dorchester, DT1 1HD ISSN 1476-4334 THE ROYAL SOCIETY OF EDINBURGH DIRECTORY 2016/2017 PUBLISHED BY THE RSE SCOTLAND FOUNDATION ISSN 1476-4334 The Royal Society of Edinburgh 22-26 George Street Edinburgh EH2 2PQ Telephone : 0131 240 5000 Fax : 0131 240 5024 email: [email protected] web: www.royalsoced.org.uk Scottish Charity No. SC 000470 Printed in Great Britain by Henry Ling Limited CONTENTS THE ORIGINS AND DEVELOPMENT OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY OF EDINBURGH .....................................................3 COUNCIL OF THE SOCIETY ..............................................................5 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE ..................................................................6 THE RSE SCOTLAND FOUNDATION ..................................................7 THE RSE SCOTLAND SCIO ................................................................8 RSE STAFF ........................................................................................9 LAWS OF THE SOCIETY (revised October 2014) ..............................13 STANDING COMMITTEES OF COUNCIL ..........................................27 SECTIONAL COMMITTEES AND THE ELECTORAL PROCESS ............37 DEATHS REPORTED 26 March 2014 - 06 April 2016 .....................................................43 FELLOWS ELECTED March 2015 ...................................................................................45
    [Show full text]
  • Muscle Satellite Cells Are Primed for Myogenesis but Maintain Quiescence with Sequestration of Myf5 Mrna Targeted by Microrna-31 in Mrnp Granules
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Elsevier - Publisher Connector Cell Stem Cell Short Article Muscle Satellite Cells Are Primed for Myogenesis but Maintain Quiescence with Sequestration of Myf5 mRNA Targeted by microRNA-31 in mRNP Granules Colin G. Crist,1,2 Didier Montarras,1 and Margaret Buckingham1,* 1CNRS URA 2578, Department of Developmental Biology, Institut Pasteur, 25 Rue du Dr. Roux, 75724 Paris Cedex 15, France 2Present address: Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research and Department of Human Genetics, McGill University, Montreal, QC H3A 1B1, Canada *Correspondence: [email protected] http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.stem.2012.03.011 SUMMARY Pax3 in many muscles (Relaix et al., 2006); however, unlike their embryonic counterparts, more than 95% have already activated Regeneration of adult tissues depends on stem cells the Myf5 gene in the course of their history (Kuang et al., 2007), that are primed to enter a differentiation program, indicating that they had entered the myogenic program. Further- while remaining quiescent. How these two character- more, the majority of quiescent satellite cells maintain Myf5 tran- istics can be reconciled is exemplified by skeletal scription (Beauchamp et al., 2000; Pallafacchina et al., 2010). muscle in which the majority of quiescent satellite Here, we examine the posttranscriptional mechanisms that cells transcribe the myogenic determination gene function to repress the translation of Myf5 mRNA, thereby holding quiescent satellite cells poised to enter the myogenic Myf5, without activating the myogenic program. We program. show that Myf5 mRNA, together with microRNA-31, which regulates its translation, is sequestered in RESULTS mRNP granules present in the quiescent satellite cell.
    [Show full text]
  • IX Meeting of the Spanish Society for Developmental Biology November 12-14, 2012 Granada
    IX Meeting of the Spanish Society for Developmental Biology November 12-14, 2012 Granada Abstract Book Index 01- Programme .................................................................................................................................................. 0 8 02- Principal Lectures .................................................................................................................................... 13 1 -Opening lecture Eric Olson .................................................................................................................................... 14 03- Invited Speakers ........................................................................................................................................ 15 Session 1 – Developmental Genomics................................................................................................. 16 1- Jose Luis Gómez Skarmeta (CABD, Sevilla) ......................................................................................................... 17 Session 2 – Tissue Patterning and Differentiation ......................................................................... 18 1- Anton Moorman (AMC, Amsterdam, Netherlands) ................................................................................................ 19 2 - Mar Ruiz (CBMSO, Madrid) ................................................................................................................................... 20 Session 3 – Cell Adhesion and Migration ..........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Transcriptome Analyses Based on Genetic Screens
    Lagha et al. BMC Genomics 2010, 11:696 http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2164/11/696 RESEARCH ARTICLE Open Access Transcriptome analyses based on genetic screens for Pax3 myogenic targets in the mouse embryo Mounia Lagha6†, Takahiko Sato6†, Béatrice Regnault1, Ana Cumano2, Aimée Zuniga3, Jonathan Licht4, Frédéric Relaix5, Margaret Buckingham6* Abstract Background: Pax3 is a key upstream regulator of the onset of myogenesis, controlling progenitor cell survival and behaviour as well as entry into the myogenic programme. It functions in the dermomyotome of the somite from which skeletal muscle derives and in progenitor cell populations that migrate from the somite such as those of the limbs. Few Pax3 target genes have been identified. Identifying genes that lie genetically downstream of Pax3 is therefore an important endeavour in elucidating the myogenic gene regulatory network. Results: We have undertaken a screen in the mouse embryo which employs a Pax3GFP allele that permits isolation of Pax3 expressing cells by flow cytometry and a Pax3PAX3-FKHR allele that encodes PAX3-FKHR in which the DNA binding domain of Pax3 is fused to the strong transcriptional activation domain of FKHR. This constitutes a gain of function allele that rescues the Pax3 mutant phenotype. Microarray comparisons were carried out between Pax3GFP/ + and Pax3GFP/PAX3-FKHR preparations from the hypaxial dermomyotome of somites at E9.5 and forelimb buds at E10.5. A further transcriptome comparison between Pax3-GFP positive and negative cells identified sequences specific to myogenic progenitors in the forelimb buds. Potential Pax3 targets, based on changes in transcript levels on the gain of function genetic background, were validated by analysis on loss or partial loss of function Pax3 mutant backgrounds.
    [Show full text]