DOCSLIB.ORG

Goddard Space Flight Center's Earth Sciences Division Strategic Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Goddard Space Flight Center's Earth Sciences Division Strategic Plan National Aeronautics and Space Administration GODDARD SPACE FLIGHT CENTER’S EARTH SCIENCES DIVISION Strategic Plan / Annual Report January 2011 IceBridge Floods in Pakistan Our Mission “To Improve Life on Earth and to Enable Space Exploration through the Use of Space-Based Observations” India’s Groundwater 2010 Ozone Hole Maximum GloPac Flights Global Hawk Gulf Oil Spill www.nasa.gov Strategic Plan/Annual Report 2011 Table of Contents Preface . iii Part I The Earth Sciences Division 1. Philosophy . 3 2. The NASA Vision and Mission . 5 3. GSFC’s Support of National Needs for Earth System Science . 6 4. GSFC Earth Sciences Division’s Mission and Goals . 9 5. Inside GSFC’s Earth Sciences Division . .11 5.1 What the Earth Sciences Division Does . .11 5.2 Development and Management of Long-Term Data Sets . 13 5.3 Managing and Setting Priorities within the Earth Sciences Division . 14 5.4 Supporting Mission Planning for NASA Headquarters . 15 5.5 Partnerships with the Academic Community and Government Laboratories . 15 5.6 Partnerships with Operational Agencies . 16 5.7 Toward a More Diversified Workforce . 16 6. How GSFC’s Earth Sciences Division Operates . 17 6.1 Organizational and Administrative Structure . 17 6.2 Workforce Composition . 18 6.3 Funding Sources for the Division . 19 7. Challenges and Opportunities . 22 7.1 The Funding Process and Full Cost Accounting . 22 7.2 Retention of Skills and New Hires . 22 7.3 Some Measures of Our Performance . 23 Part II Our Scientific Foci and Strategic Plan 8. ESD Science/Research Areas . 27 8.1 Atmospheric Composition . 27 8.1.1 Atmospheric Chemistry . 27 8.1.1.1 Observations of Chemical Constituents . 28 8.1.1.2 Chemical Modeling . 31 8.1.2 Atmospheric Aerosols . 33 8.2 Hydrospheric Processes . 36 8.2.1 Oceanography . 36 8.2.1.1 Physical Oceanography . 37 8.2.1.2 Biological Oceanography . 38 i NASA GSFC Earth Sciences Division 8.2.2 Polar Climate Change . 39 8.2.3 Terrestrial Water Cycle . 42 8.3 Carbon Cycle and Ecosystems . 49 8.3.1 Terrestrial Carbon Cycle . 51 8.3.2 Terrestrial Ecosystems and Land Cover . 52 8.4 Climate and Weather – Analysis, Modeling, Assimilation, and Prediction . 54 8.4.1 Data Assimilation . 57 8.4.2 Weather Prediction . 58 8.4.3 Chemical Constituents - Analysis and Prediction . 59 8.4.4 Subseasonal-to-Decadal Climate Variability and Prediction . 60 8.4.5 Climate Change Modeling and Analysis . 61 8.5 Earth Observing System (EOS) Project Science Office . 64 8.6 Managing and Analyzing Data . 66 8.6.1 Data Management Focus Areas . 67 8.6.2 High-Performance Computing . 75 8.6.3 Advanced Software Development . 79 9. Instruments, Technology, and New Missions . 80 9.1 Instruments . 80 9.2 New Platforms and Vantage Points . 81 9.2.1 Unmanned Aircraft Systems . 81 9.2.2 Geostationary Orbit . 82 9.2.3 Venture Class Concepts . 82 9.2.4 International Space Station Utilization . 82 9.3 Operating Missions . 82 9.4 Airborne Missions . 86 9.5 Missions in Development . 88 9.6 Future Missions . 97 10. Applications . 103 11. Education and Public Engagement . .112 Part III Appendices Appendix A. Missions and Application Activities . .116 Appendix B. Education and Public Engagement Activities . 123 Appendix C. Project Scientists and Deputy Project Scientists . 137 Appendix D. Field Campaigns and Workshops . 139 Appendix E. Professional Activities, Honors, and Awards . 143 Appendix F. Acronyms . 149 ii Strategic Plan/Annual Report 2011 Preface The national and international issues surrounding climate change make this a particularly interesting time for the Earth Sciences Division (ESD) at the Goddard Space Flight Center (GSFC). The National Research Council (NRC) report, Informing an Effective Response to Climate Change (2010), notes that although the “...demand for information to support climate-related decisions has grown rapidly as people, organizations, and governments have moved ahead with plans and actions to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and to adapt to.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Destabilizing Thermohaline Circulation–Atmosphere–Sea Ice
    642 JOURNAL OF CLIMATE VOLUME 12 NOTES AND CORRESPONDENCE A Destabilizing Thermohaline Circulation±Atmosphere±Sea Ice Feedback STEVEN R. JAYNE MIT±WHOI Joint Program in Oceanography, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, Woods Hole, Massachusetts JOCHEM MAROTZKE Center for Global Change Science, Department of Earth, Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 18 November 1996 and 9 March 1998 ABSTRACT Some of the interactions and feedbacks between the atmosphere, thermohaline circulation, and sea ice are illustrated using a simple process model. A simpli®ed version of the annual-mean coupled ocean±atmosphere box model of Nakamura, Stone, and Marotzke is modi®ed to include a parameterization of sea ice. The model includes the thermodynamic effects of sea ice and allows for variable coverage. It is found that the addition of sea ice introduces feedbacks that have a destabilizing in¯uence on the thermohaline circulation: Sea ice insulates the ocean from the atmosphere, creating colder air temperatures at high latitudes, which cause larger atmospheric eddy heat and moisture transports and weaker oceanic heat transports. These in turn lead to thicker ice coverage and hence establish a positive feedback. The results indicate that generally in colder climates, the presence of sea ice may lead to a signi®cant destabilization of the thermohaline circulation. Brine rejection by sea ice plays no important role in this model's dynamics. The net destabilizing effect of sea ice in this model is the result of two positive feedbacks and one negative feedback and is shown to be model dependent. To date, the destabilizing feedback between atmospheric and oceanic heat ¯uxes, mediated by sea ice, has largely been neglected in conceptual studies of thermohaline circulation stability, but it warrants further investigation in more realistic models.
    [Show full text]
  • Tropical Climate
    UGAMP: A network of excellence in climate modelling and research Issue 27 October 2003 UGAMP Coordinator: Prof. Julia Slingo [email protected] Newsletter Editor: Dr. Glenn Carver [email protected] Newsletter website: acmsu.nerc.ac.uk/newsletter.html Contents NCAS News . 2 NCAS Websites . 3 NCAS Centres and Facilities . 3 UGAMP Coordinator . 4 CGAM Director . 4 ACMSU Director . 4 HPC Facilities . 5 New areas of UGAMP science 7 Chemistry-climate interactions . 19 Climate variability and predictability . 32 Atmospheric Composition . 48 Tropospheric chemistry and aerosols . 58 Climate Dynamics . 64 Model development . 72 Group News . 78 (for full contents see listing on the inside back cover) NERC Centres for Atmospheric Science, NCAS Alan Thorpe ([email protected]): Director NCAS Since the last UGAMP Newsletter there have been a significant number of NCAS developments relevant to the UK atmospheric science community. These include the following, which are particularly pertinent to the UGAMP community: • NERC have agreed to fund a new directed (new name for thematic) programme called “Surface Ocean – Lower Atmosphere Study” or SOLAS for short. • NERC have agreed to fund a “pump-priming” activity for a proposed new directed programme called Flood Risk from Extreme Events, FREE. The full proposal for FREE will be considered by NERC early in 2004. •NCAS is supporting a project to develop a new chemistry module for the HadGEM model. This is called UK-CHEM and Olaf Morgenstern at ACMSU is collaborating closely with the Hadley Centre on the project. •NCAS is supporting a project to develop the science for a new aerosol module for HadGEM.
    [Show full text]
  • Results from the Implementation of the Elastic Viscous Plastic Sea Ice Rheology in Hadcm3 W
    Results from the implementation of the Elastic Viscous Plastic sea ice rheology in HadCM3 W. M. Connolley, A. B. Keen, A. J. Mclaren To cite this version: W. M. Connolley, A. B. Keen, A. J. Mclaren. Results from the implementation of the Elastic Viscous Plastic sea ice rheology in HadCM3. Ocean Science, European Geosciences Union, 2006, 2 (2), pp.201- 211. hal-00298295 HAL Id: hal-00298295 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00298295 Submitted on 23 Oct 2006 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Ocean Sci., 2, 201–211, 2006 www.ocean-sci.net/2/201/2006/ Ocean Science © Author(s) 2006. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License. Results from the implementation of the Elastic Viscous Plastic sea ice rheology in HadCM3 W. M. Connolley1, A. B. Keen2, and A. J. McLaren2 1British Antarctic Survey, High Cross, Madingley Road, Cambridge, CB3 0ET, UK 2Met Office Hadley Centre, FitzRoy Road, Exeter, EX1 3PB, UK Received: 13 June 2006 – Published in Ocean Sci. Discuss.: 10 July 2006 Revised: 21 September 2006 – Accepted: 16 October 2006 – Published: 23 October 2006 Abstract. We present results of an implementation of the a full dynamical model incorporating wind stresses and in- Elastic Viscous Plastic (EVP) sea ice dynamics scheme into ternal ice stresses leads to errors in the detailed representa- the Hadley Centre coupled ocean-atmosphere climate model tion of sea ice and limits our confidence in its future predic- HadCM3.
    [Show full text]
  • 3. CICE-Mixed Layer Model 4. Mixed Layer/ Sea Ice Results 5. Surface
    The ocean mixed layer, buoyancy fluxes, and sea ice over the Antarctic continental shelf Alek Petty1, Daniel Feltham2 & Paul Holland3 1. Centre for Polar Observation and Modelling, Department of Earth Sciences, UCL, London, WC1E6BT 2. Centre for Polar Observation and Modelling, Department of Meteorology, Reading University, Reading, RG6 6BB 2. British Antarctic Survey, High Cross, Cambridge, CB3 0ET A sea ice-mixed layer model has been used to investigate regional variations in the surface-driven formation of Antarctic shelf sea waters. The model captures well the expected sea ice thickness distribution, and produces deep mixed layers in the Weddell and Ross shelf seas each winter (1985-2011). By deconstructing the surface power input to the mixed layer, we have shown that the salt/fresh water flux from sea ice growth/melt dominates the evolution of the mixed layer in all shelf sea regions, with a smaller contribution from the mixed layer-surface heat flux. An analysis of the sea ice mass balance has demonstrated the contrasting mean ice growth, melt and export in each region. The Weddell and Ross shelf seas expereince the highest annual ice growth, with a large fraction of this ice exported northwards each year, whereas the Bellingshausen shelf sea experiences the highest annual ice melt, despite the low annual ice growth. Cur- rent work (not shown) is focussed on atmospheric forcing trends and the resultant trends in the sea ice and mixed layer evolution using both ERA-I hindcast forcing and hadGEM2 future climate projections. 1. Introduction The continental shelf seas surround- ing Antarctica are a crucial compo- nent of the Earth’s climate system, with the Weddell and Ross (WR) shelf seas cooling and ventilating the deep ocean and feeding the global thermohaline circulation, whereas the warm waters in the Amundsen and Bellingshausen (AB) shelf seas (see Figure 1) are implicit in the recent ocean-driven melting of the Antarctic ice sheet.
    [Show full text]
  • Whither the Weather Analysis and Forecasting Process?
    520 WEATHER AND FORECASTING VOLUME 18 FORECASTER'S FORUM Whither the Weather Analysis and Forecasting Process? LANCE F. B OSART Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, The University at Albany, State University of New York, Albany, New York 5 December 2002 and 19 December 2002 ABSTRACT An argument is made that if human forecasters are to continue to maintain a skill advantage over steadily improving model and guidance forecasts, then ways have to be found to prevent the deterioration of forecaster skills through disuse. The argument is extended to suggest that the absence of real-time, high quality mesoscale surface analyses is a signi®cant roadblock to forecaster ability to detect, track, diagnose, and predict important mesoscale circulation features associated with a rich variety of weather of interest to the general public. 1. Introduction h day-1 QPF scores made by selected NCEP models, By any objective or subjective measure, weather fore- including the Nested Grid Model (NGM; Hoke et al. casting skill has improved signi®cantly over the last 40 1989), the Eta Model (Black 1994), and the Aviation years. By way of illustration, Fig. 1 shows the annual Model [AVN, now called the Global Forecast System threat score for 24-h quantitative precipitation forecast (GFS); Kanamitsu et al. (1991); Kalnay et al. (1998)]. (QPF) amounts of 1.00 in. (2.5 cm) or more over the The key point to be made from Fig. 2 is that HPC contiguous United States for 1961±2001 as produced by forecasters have been able to sustain approximately a forecasters at the Hydrometeorological Prediction Cen- 0.05 threat score advantage over the NCEP numerical ter (HPC) of the National Centers for Environmental models during this 12-yr period (and longer, not shown) Prediction (NCEP).
    [Show full text]
  • Test Plan: CICE Sea Ice Model for NGGPS
    Test Plan: CICE Sea Ice Model for NGGPS Final 16 March 2016 POC: Shan Sun – NOAA ESRL/GSD/GMTB – [email protected] ​ Introduction After reviewing several sea ice models at the Sea Ice Workshop organized by Global Modeling Test Bed (GMTB) in February 2016, the committee has selected the Los Alamos Community Ice CodE (CICE) as the sea ice model to be ​ incorporated as a component of Next-Generation Global Prediction System ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ (NGGPS). The GMTB is proposing to carry out testing and evaluations with this model in two phases as the next step. Testing framework Hebert et al. (2015) showed that the Arctic Cap Nowcast/Forecast System ​ (ACNFS) demonstrated a high level of skill compared to persistence in 1-7 day forecasts over a period of one year. ACNFS uses CICE version 4.0 [Hunke and Lipscomb, 2008] as the sea ice model two-way coupled to the HYbrid Coordinate Ocean Model (HYCOM) [Bleck, 2002; Metzger et al., 2014, 2015]. Building on this study, we propose to base the test on a similar configuration. In order to make the test most relevant for NGGPS, there will be three important differences with respect to the Herbert et al. (2015) configuration. First, CICE will be upgraded to its latest version v5, [in which both the code structure and the state variables are similar to v4. The CICE5 code does include a number of new physics options such as the mushy-layer thermodynamics and two new melt pond parameterizations.] V5.1.2 is available at http://oceans11.lanl.gov/svn/CICE/tags/release-5.1.2.
    [Show full text]
  • A New Dynamical Downscaling Approach with GCM Bias
    PUBLICATIONS Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres RESEARCH ARTICLE A new dynamical downscaling approach with GCM 10.1002/2014JD022958 bias corrections and spectral nudging Key Points: Zhongfeng Xu1 and Zong-Liang Yang2,3 • Both GCM and RCM biases should be constrained in regional climate 1RCE-TEA and Young Scientist Laboratory, Institute of Atmospheric Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China, projection 2 3 • The NDD approach significantly RCE-TEA, Institute of Atmospheric Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China, Department of Geological improves the downscaled climate Sciences, Jackson School of Geosciences, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, USA • NDD is designed for regional climate projection at various time scales Abstract To improve confidence in regional projections of future climate, a new dynamical downscaling Supporting Information: (NDD) approach with both general circulation model (GCM) bias corrections and spectral nudging is developed • Figures S1–S4 and assessed over North America. GCM biases are corrected by adjusting GCM climatological means and • Figure S1 variances based on reanalysis data before the GCM output is used to drive a regional climate model (RCM). • Figure S2 • Figure S3 Spectral nudging is also applied to constrain RCM-based biases. Three sets of RCM experiments are integrated • Figure S4 over a 31 year period. In the first set of experiments, the model configurations are identical except that the initial and lateral boundary conditions are derived from either the original GCM output, the bias-corrected GCM output, Correspondence to: orthereanalysisdata.Thesecondset of experiments is the same as the first set except spectral nudging is applied. Z.-L. Yang, [email protected] The third set of experiments includes two sensitivity runs with both GCM bias corrections and nudging where the nudging strength is progressively reduced.
    [Show full text]
  • The Operational CMC–MRB Global Environmental Multiscale (GEM)
    VOLUME 126 MONTHLY WEATHER REVIEW JUNE 1998 The Operational CMC±MRB Global Environmental Multiscale (GEM) Model. Part I: Design Considerations and Formulation JEAN COÃ TEÂ AND SYLVIE GRAVEL Meteorological Research Branch, Atmospheric Environment Service, Dorval, Quebec, Canada ANDREÂ MEÂ THOT AND ALAIN PATOINE Canadian Meteorological Centre, Atmospheric Environment Service, Dorval, Quebec, Canada MICHEL ROCH AND ANDREW STANIFORTH Meteorological Research Branch, Atmospheric Environment Service, Dorval, Quebec, Canada (Manuscript received 31 March 1997, in ®nal form 3 October 1997) ABSTRACT An integrated forecasting and data assimilation system has been and is continuing to be developed by the Meteorological Research Branch (MRB) in partnership with the Canadian Meteorological Centre (CMC) of Environment Canada. Part I of this two-part paper motivates the development of the new system, summarizes various considerations taken into its design, and describes its main characteristics. 1. Introduction time and space scales that are commensurate with those An integrated atmospheric environmental forecasting associated with the phenomena of interest, and this im- and simulation system, described herein, has been and poses serious practical constraints and compromises on is continuing to be developed by the Meteorological their formulation. Research Branch (MRB) in partnership with the Ca- Emphasis is placed in this two-part paper on the con- nadian Meteorological Centre (CMC) of Environment cepts underlying the long-term developmental strategy,
    [Show full text]
  • Assimila Blank
    NERC NERC Strategy for Earth System Modelling: Technical Support Audit Report Version 1.1 December 2009 Contact Details Dr Zofia Stott Assimila Ltd 1 Earley Gate The University of Reading Reading, RG6 6AT Tel: +44 (0)118 966 0554 Mobile: +44 (0)7932 565822 email: [email protected] NERC STRATEGY FOR ESM – AUDIT REPORT VERSION1.1, DECEMBER 2009 Contents 1. BACKGROUND ....................................................................................................................... 4 1.1 Introduction .............................................................................................................. 4 1.2 Context .................................................................................................................... 4 1.3 Scope of the ESM audit ............................................................................................ 4 1.4 Methodology ............................................................................................................ 5 2. Scene setting ........................................................................................................................... 7 2.1 NERC Strategy......................................................................................................... 7 2.2 Definition of Earth system modelling ........................................................................ 8 2.3 Broad categories of activities supported by NERC ................................................. 10 2.4 Structure of the report ...........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • MP - Mechanistic Habitat Modeling with Multi-Model Climate Ensembles - Final - HMJ5.Docx
    MP - Mechanistic Habitat Modeling with Multi-Model Climate Ensembles - Final - HMJ5.docx Mechanistic Habitat Modeling with Multi-Model Climate Ensembles A practical guide to preparing and using Global Climate Model output for mechanistically modeling habitat, as exemplified by the modeling of the fundamental niche of a pagophilic Pinniped species through 2100. Masters project submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Master of Environmental Management degree in the Nicholas School of the Environment of Duke University, May 2013. Author: Hunter Jones Adviser: Dr. David Johnston Abstract Projections of future Sea Ice Concentration (SIC) were prepared using a 13- member ensemble of climate model output from the Coupled Model Inter- comparison Project (CMIP5). Three climate change scenarios (RCP 2.6, RCP 6.0, RCP 8.5), corresponding to low, moderate, and high climate change possibilities, were used to generate these projections for known Harp Seal whelping locations. The projections were splined and statistically downscaled via the CCAFS Delta method using satellite-derived observations from the National Sea Ice Data Center (NSIDC) to prepare a spatial representation of sea ice decline through the year 2100. Multi-Model Ensemble projections of the mean sea ice concentration anomaly for Harp Seal whelping locations under the moderate and high climate change scenarios (RCP 6.0 and RCP 8.5) show a decline of 10% to 40% by 2100 from a modern baseline climatology (average of SIC, 1988 - 2005) while sea ice concentrations under the low climate change scenario remain fairly stable. Projected year-over-year sea ice concentration variability decreases with time through 2100, but uncertainty in the prediction (model spread) increases.
    [Show full text]
  • Downscaling Geopotential Height Using Lapse Rate
    KMITL Sci. Tech. J. Vol. 12 No. 2 Jul.-Dec. 2012 Downscaling Geopotential Height Using Lapse Rate Chiranya Surawut1 and Dusadee Sukawat2* 1Earth System Science, King Mongkut ’s University of Technology Thonburi, Bangkok, Thailand 2*Department of Mathematics, King Mongkut’s University of Technology Thonburi, Bangkok, Thailand Abstract In order to utilize the output from a global climate model, relevant information for the area of interest must be extracted. This is called "downscaling". In this paper, the derivation of a local geopotential height in terms of lapse rate is presented. The main assumptions are hydrostatic balance, perfect gas, constant gravity, and constant lapse rate. Two sets of data are required for this method, simulation outputs from the Education Global Climate Model (EdGCM) and the observed data at the points of interest (Chiangmai, Bangkok, Ubon Ratchathani, Phuket and Songkla). The results show that downscaling of the geopotential heights by using lapse rate dynamic equation are closer to the observed data than the geopotential heights from EdGCM. Keywords: Downscaling, Geopotential height, Lapse rate 1. Introduction Climate change data are simulation outputs from global climate models (GCMs). Outputs of GCMs are coarse resolution, so it must be downscaled for use in regional applications by downscaling [1]. The starting point for downscaling is a larger scale atmospheric or coupled oceanic atmospheric model run from a GCM [2]. There are two major kinds of downscaling, statistical and dynamical methods. Statistical downscaling methods use historical data and archived forecasts to produce downscaled information from large scale forecasts. Dynamical downscaling methods involve dynamical models of the atmosphere nested within the grids of the large scale forecast models [1].
    [Show full text]
  • Bias Removal and Model Consensus Forecasts of Maximum and Minimum Temperatures Using the Graphical Forecast Editor 1. Introducti
    Bias Removal and Model Consensus Forecasts of Maximum and Minimum Temperatures Using the Graphical Forecast Editor Jeffrey T. Davis National Weather Service Office Tucson, Arizona 1. Introduction Operational Numerical Weather Prediction (NWP) models have inherent biases that need to be removed either objectively or subjectively before used in official National Weather Service (NWS) forecasts. The recent shift of the NWS to the Interactive Forecast Preparation System (IFPS) to create and distribute digital weather forecasts has led to more of a dependency on the direct use of NWP models. This dependency on raw model output is mainly due to the gridded format needed to initialize digital weather forecasts. The primary tool for creating these digital forecasts is the Graphical Forecast Editor (GFE) (Lefebvre, 1995). The GFE has two design features that account for the objective and subjective adjustments of the native NWP model grid. The front-end feature is referred to as “Smart Initialization” which is used to objectively derive sensible weather elements and downscale the coarser resolution models to a higher 2.5 km or 5 km grid spacing. The second feature is interactive and accounts for both subjective and objective adjustments through the use of simple graphical editing tools and “Smart Tools”. The baseline GFE design lacks the capability to objectively remove model biases in the initialization process. This is not to say that the GFE should have this capability, but high resolution, bias-corrected model grids are not currently included in the overall IFPS design. As a result, forecasters are tasked with subjectively correcting for these model biases using the GFE tools.
    [Show full text]