DOCSLIB.ORG

Committee of Ministers Secrétariat Du Comité Des Ministres

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Committee of Ministers Secrétariat Du Comité Des Ministres SECRETARIAT / SECRÉTARIAT SECRETARIAT OF THE COMMITTEE OF MINISTERS SECRÉTARIAT DU COMITÉ DES MINISTRES Contact: John Darcy Tel: 03 88 41 31 56 Date: 15/05/2019 DH-DD(2019)546 Document distributed under the sole responsibility of its author, without prejudice to the legal or political position of the Committee of Ministers. Meeting: 1348th meeting (June 2019) (DH) Communication from a NGO (Human Rights House Zagreb and Documenta - Center for Dealing with the Past) and response from the Croatian authorities (14/05/2019) in the SKENDZIC AND KRZNARIC group of cases v. Croatia (Application No. 16212/08) Information made available under Rules 9.2 and 9.6 of the Rules of the Committee of Ministers for the supervision of the execution of judgments and of the terms of friendly settlements. * * * * * * * * * * * Document distribué sous la seule responsabilité de son auteur, sans préjuger de la position juridique ou politique du Comité des Ministres. Réunion : 1348e réunion (juin 2019) (DH) Communication d’une ONG (Human Rights House Zagreb and Documenta - Center for Dealing with the Past) et réponse des autorités croates (14/05/2019) dans le groupe d’affaires SKENDZIC ET KRZNARIC c. Croatie (requête n° 16212/08) (anglais uniquement). Informations mises à disposition en vertu des Règles 9.2 et 9.6 des Règles du Comité des Ministres pour la surveillance de l’exécution des arrêts et des termes des règlements amiables. DH-DD(2019)546: Reply from Croatia to a communication from a NGO. Documents distributed at the request of a Representative shall be under the sole responsibility of the said Representative, without prejudice to the legal or political position of the Committee of Ministers. HUMAN Selska œsta 112 a/c, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia RIGHTS tel/ fax: +385 1 551 33 95 HOUSE kontaktOkucalJudskihprava.hr n ZAGREB www.kucaUud5l<ihprava.hr Zagreb, May 6, 2019 COUNCIL OF EUROPE DEPARTMENT FOR THE EXECUTION OF JUDGMENTS OF THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS STRASBOURG, FRANCE Rule 9.2 Communication concerning Skendzié group of cases v. Croatia from Human Rights House Zagreb and Documenta -Center for Dealing with the Past 1. The aim of this submission is to update the Committee of Ministers concerning the long-term lack of full and effective implementation of general measures in the Skendzié group of cases. 2. The submission is prepared by Human Rights House Zagreb in cooperation with Documenta - Center for Dealing with the Past, both Croatian civil society organisations. Human Rights House Zagreb1 is a human rights watch-dog and advocacy organization founded in 2008 as a network of civil society organizations with the goal to protect and promote human rights and fundamental freedoms through research, monitoring, public advocacy, and education. Documenta's2 mission is to encourage the process of dealing with the past in Croatia, to document and investigate war, wartime and postwar events and work with civil society organizations, governmental institutions, and similar center aboard. Background 3. The Skendi:ié group of cases is erevealed the problem of ineffective investigations into war crimes in Croatia on account of inexplicable delays and shortcomings in taking actions aimed at collecting the evidence. 'http://www.kucalJu<l_~k1_t1_Q_rava.hr/en( 2 hUp§:/lwww.dorumerita.hr/en/homo.html DH-DD(2019)546: Reply from Croatia to a communication from a NGO. Documents distributed at the request of a Representative shall be under the sole responsibility of the said Representative, without prejudice to the legal or political position of the Committee of Ministers. HUMAN RIGKT'S KOUH DOCUMENTA 0 D CENTAR 7 A SUOCAVANJE S PRO~LOStU Problems with administrative and the Government's practice 4. The administrative and the Government's practice concerning m1ssmg persans, locating burial sites of victims and identifying exhumed remains ineffective and conducive to climate of impunity for war crimes. The process of identifying missing persons is not fast enough and cannot be considered satisfactory. ln 2018, the remains of 30 persans were exhumed and identification of 47 remains was brought to an end. According to the Ministry of Croatian Veterans' Affairs, on 31 December 2018 the official records counted 1 497 persons as missing. ln addition to that, 414 requests were lodged by families for search for the remains of their dead next-of-kins for which there is no known place of burial, which, in total makes 1 911 unresolved missing persans cases, of which 900 are 3 missing persons of Serb ethnicity . 5. The work of the Office for the Detained and Missing Persans is still largely not transparent since the names of the persans are not published after the identification has been carried out. This practice denies information to the public on identity of persons whose remains have been identified and on locations where victims have been exhumed, which has a paramount importance for clarification of 1990s war events and is therefore of a great public interest. 6. The regional cooperation between competent Croatian and Serbian authorities on exhumation and identification of mortal remains is insufficient and inadequate. As an illustration of this situation, members of the Missing Persons Commission of the Republic of Serbia were not invited to attend the identification of Serb victims conducted on 5 February 2019 at the KBC Salata in Zagreb with the explanation that the relatives of the identified persans reside in the territory of the Republic of Croatia and therefore identification has no regional character. Such conduct by the Croatian authorities prevented information sharing with the competent institutions and associations of families of missing persans from the Republic of Serbia. ln the same vein, on 11 November 2018 the Serbian Minister of Justice stated before the UN Security Council that in 24 cases the Office of the War Crimes Prosecutor of the Republic of Serbia received no response from the Prosecutor's Office of the Republic of Croatia on requests for evidence and information, despite the terms of the cooperation agreement. 4 7. Similar comments have recently been made by IRMCT (the abbreviation stands for International Residual Mechanism for Criminat Tribunals) Chief Prosecutor concerning the Jack of cooperation with Bosnia and Herzegovina. He noted that in one case a request for assistance remained unanswered by the Croatian Ministry of Justice after more than two years. and two other cases still have not been processed more than two years after the files were transferred to Croatia. The Croatian State Attorney's Office declined the offer of the Chief Prosecutor Brammertz to host a meeting between Bosnian and Croatian prosecutors to resolve these issues. The Chief Prosecutor therefore 1 Ombudswoman·s 2018 Annual Repon, p. 163-164, availablo at: http:l/o,nbuds1nan.hr/Mcomponen11jdo-.vn10ad"send/84-2018/1~;14_-lzyif!!ce­ pucke-~r;:,,-ob<Mite~ice-za-.2018-qtoo,nu • UN Security Council 6416th meeting, 11 Oecember 2018, S/PV.6416, p. 23 available at: http://www.un.orglen/ga/search/v,ew_ doc.asp?symbol=S/PV .6416 DH-DD(2019)546: Reply from Croatia to a communication from a NGO. Documents distributed at the request of a Representative shall be under the sole responsibility of the said Representative, without prejudice to the legal or political position of the Committee of Ministers. HUMAN ltlGHTS HOUSI DOCUMENTA n D CfNTAR 7A SU0CAVANJ[ S PRœLôSéU stressed he "is seriously concerned about the lack of progress and calls upon Croatian authorities to expedite the processing of these cases."5 8. ln Letter of 19 November 2018 addressed by the IRMCT President to the President of the UN Security Council, which included the IRMCT Chief Prosecutor assessment, the latter reported that "the Government of Croatia, by failing to withdraw its 2015 conclusion dlrecting its Ministry of Justice not to provide judicial cooperation in certain war crimes 6 cases, regrettably continues to interfere politically ln the justice processes" • As a result, a large and growing number of war crimes cases against former members of Croatian and Bosnian Croat forces are frozen. The conclusion has not been made publicly available. 9. ln view of the above, the IRMCT Chief Prosecutor concluded that despite his Office's direct engagement with the Croatian authorities, "very little progress has been achieved over the past three years with respect to this Croatian policy and its negative impact. The policy is having the effect of promoting impunity at the expense of the victims throughout the region, who deserve justice." The Chief Prosecutor highlighted that "no satisfactory explanations have been provided for the maintenance of this policy and indeed none could be provided, particularly by a State member of the European Union". He therefore called on the Government of Croatia to "withdraw the policy immediately and allow justice 7 process ta continue without further intereference". Overall, the IRMCT Chief Prosecutor highlighted that "significant efforts are needed to show that war crimes justice in Croatia is on the right track."8 His views are widely shared by the civil sector and victims' families alike. 1O. lt is furthermore highlighted that the official registers on war crimes victims kept by the Croatian authorities remain incoherent. For instance, Mr Milan Skendzié is still counted in the Ministry of lnterior's Register of Missing Persans while at the same time he is not counted in the Ministry of Croatian Veterans' Affairs Book of Missing Persans. The two exhumations carried out based on anonymous statements did not yield results. Witnesses of Mr Skendzié's departure from Otoëac and arrest in Gospié, where he disappeared without a trace, do not speak most likely due to fear, which is commonly observed in war crimes investigations. 11. The Act on Missing Persons during the Home/and War has not yet been passed despite the fact that the war was brought to an end more than 20 years ago.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Analiza 2.Pdf
    GAP ANALYSIS Page 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ABBREVIATIONS 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 4 1.0 INTRODUCTORY REMARKS 7 1.1 Demographics on national minorities in the Republic of Croatia 7 1.2 Legal and institutional framework protecting the national minorities in 8 the RoC 1.3 Councils of National Minorities 9 1.4 Support to the Councils of National Minorities in Areas of Special State 12 Concern (the Project) 2.0 DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS METHODOLOGY 13 2.1 Phase I – initial data collection 13 2.2 Phase II – data collection 13 2.3 Defined sample of stakeholders within the Phase II 14 2.3.1 Local and regional authorities 14 2.3.2 Councils of National Minorities 15 2.3.3 Co-ordinations of Councils of National Minorities 18 2.4 Approach used in development of the GAP Analysis 19 2.5 Approach used for preparing the recommendations for improving the 19 effectiveness of the LCNMs 3.0 GAP ANALYSIS RESULTS 20 3.1 Evaluation of the LCNM capacities and performed activities 20 3.1.1 The LCNM self-perception of the membership capacities and the 20 structure 3.1.2 The LCNM self-perception of financial and logistical capacities 22 3.1.3 The LCNM self-perception of performed work 24 3.1.4 Evaluation by the local authorities on the LCNM working capacities 25 3.2 Evaluation of the local authorities work pertaining to the LCNMs 26 3.2.1 Local authorities’ self-perception of the work pertaining to the LCNMs 26 3.2.2 The LCNM evaluation of their co-operation with local authorities 27 3.3 Evaluation of the perception of national minorities and the LCNMs by 29 the
    [Show full text]
  • News in Brief 12 July
    Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe OSCE Mission to Croatia News in brief 12 July – 25 July 2006 Prime Minister Sanader visits Serbia On 21 July, Croatian Prime Minister Ivo Sanader paid his second official visit to Serbia, further intensifying bilateral relations between the two countries. Prime Minister Sanader made his first visit to Belgrade in November 2004, followed by a reciprocal visit to Zagreb by Serbian Prime Minister Vojislav Koštunica in November 2005. Prior to their meeting in Belgrade the two Prime Ministers officially opened the newly renovated border crossing between Croatia and Serbia in Bajakovo, Eastern Croatia. At the ceremony attended by representatives of both governments and the diplomatic corps from Zagreb and Belgrade, the Croatian Premier said that "today we are opening the future of new relations between our two countries." Echoing this sentiment, Prime Minister Koštunica added that both the "Serbian and Croatian governments will work to heal wounds from the past and build a new future for the two states in a united Europe". Later, following talks in Belgrade, both Prime Ministers declared that Serbia and Croatia have a joint objective, to join the European Union, and that strong bilateral relations between the two countries should be the foundation of political security in the region. Prime Minister Sanader commended the efforts both governments had made towards improving the position of minorities in line with the bilateral agreement on minority protection signed between the two countries in November 2004. He went on to stress his cabinet’s wish to see the Serb minority fully integrated into Croatian society.
    [Show full text]
  • Book of Abstracts Book of Abstracts
    BOOK OF ABSTRACTS BOOK OF ABSTRACTS The 9th International Conference of the Faculty of Education and Rehabilitation Sciences University of Zagreb Zagreb, Croatia, 17 – 19 May, 2017 Faculty of Education and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Zagreb Faculty of Pedagogy, University of Ljubljana Department of Kinesiology, Recreation and Sports, Indiana State University ERFCON 2017 is organized under the auspices of the President of the Republic of Croatia, Mrs. Kolinda Grabar-Kitarović and the Mayor of Zagreb, Mr. Milan Bandić. PUBLISHER Faculty of Education and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Zagreb Scienific series, Book No. FOR PUBLISHER Snježana Sekušak-Galešev EDITORS Gordana Hržica Ivana Jeđud Borić GRAPHIC DESIGN Anamarija Ivanagić ISBN: The Publisher and the Editors are not to be held responsible for any substantial or linguistic imperfections that might be found in the abstracts published in this book. PROGRAMME COMMITTEE: HEAD OF THE COMMITTEE Snježana Sekušak-Galešev, PhD, Associate Professor, Vice Dean for Science Faculty of Education and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Zagreb, Croatia MEMBERS Sandra Bradarić Jončić, PhD, Professor Faculty of Education and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Zagreb, Croatia Belle Gavriel Fied, PhD, Professor The Gershon Gordon Faculty of Social Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Israel Phyllis B. Gerstenfeld, PhD, Professor and Chair of Criminal Justice California State University, Stanislaus, USA David Foxcroft, PhD, Professor Department of Psychology Social Work and Public Health
    [Show full text]
  • Framing Croatia's Politics of Memory and Identity
    Workshop: War and Identity in the Balkans and the Middle East WORKING PAPER WORKSHOP: War and Identity in the Balkans and the Middle East WORKING PAPER Author: Taylor A. McConnell, School of Social and Political Science, University of Edinburgh Title: “KRVatska”, “Branitelji”, “Žrtve”: (Re-)framing Croatia’s politics of memory and identity Date: 3 April 2018 Workshop: War and Identity in the Balkans and the Middle East WORKING PAPER “KRVatska”, “Branitelji”, “Žrtve”: (Re-)framing Croatia’s politics of memory and identity Taylor McConnell, School of Social and Political Science, University of Edinburgh Web: taylormcconnell.com | Twitter: @TMcConnell_SSPS | E-mail: [email protected] Abstract This paper explores the development of Croatian memory politics and the construction of a new Croatian identity in the aftermath of the 1990s war for independence. Using the public “face” of memory – monuments, museums and commemorations – I contend that Croatia’s narrative of self and self- sacrifice (hence “KRVatska” – a portmanteau of “blood/krv” and “Croatia/Hrvatska”) is divided between praising “defenders”/“branitelji”, selectively remembering its victims/“žrtve”, and silencing the Serb minority. While this divide is partially dependent on geography and the various ways the Croatian War for Independence came to an end in Dalmatia and Slavonia, the “defender” narrative remains preeminent. As well, I discuss the division of Croatian civil society, particularly between veterans’ associations and regional minority bodies, which continues to disrupt amicable relations among the Yugoslav successor states and places Croatia in a generally undesired but unshakable space between “Europe” and the Balkans. 1 Workshop: War and Identity in the Balkans and the Middle East WORKING PAPER Table of Contents Abstract ...................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • HU 2010 Croatia
    CROATIA Promoting social inclusion of children in a disadvantaged rural environment Antun Ilijaš and Gordana Petrović Centre for Social Care Zagreb Dora Dodig University of Zagreb Introduction Roma have lived in the territory of the Republic of Croatia since the 14th century. According to the 2001 population census, the Roma national minority makes up 0.21% of the population of Croatia, and includes 9463 members. However, according to the data of the Office for Ethnic Minority in Croatia, there is currently around 30 000 Roma people living in Croatia. It is difficult to accurately define the number of Roma people living in Croatia because some of them declare as members of some other nationality, and not as Roma. There is a higher density of Roma in some regions of Croatia: Medjimurje county, Osječko-baranjska county, Zagreb, Rijeka, Pula, Pitomača, Kutina, ðurñevac, Sisak, Slavonski Brod, Bjelovar, Karlovac and Vukovar. 1 Roma people in Croatia are considerably marginalised in almost all public and social activities and living conditions of Roma people are far more unsatisfactory than those of average population and other ethnic minorities. The position of Roma and their living conditions have been on the very margins of social interest for years, and this has contributed to the significant deterioration of the quality of their living conditions, as compared to the average quality of living conditions of the majority population. This regards their social status, the way in which their education, health care and social welfare are organised, the possibility to preserve their national identity, resolving of their status-related issues, employment, presentation in the media, political representation and similar issues.
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Availability of Social Services
    National Development Strategy Croatia 2030 Policy Note: Regional Availability of Social Services July 2019 Co-financed by the Technical Assistance of the Operational Program “Competitiveness and Cohesion” from the European Regional Development Fund Acknowledgements This policy note was prepared in the context of the Reimbursable Advisory Services Agreement “Sup- port for Establishing the System for Strategic Planning and Development Management and for Preparing the 2030 National Development Strategy”. The core World Bank team was led by Donato De Rosa (Lead Economist, Team Leader), Josip Funda (Senior Economist, co-Team Leader), and Catalin Pauna (former Team Leader) and included Stanka Crvik Oreskovic (Project Coordinator) and Bogdanka Krtinic (Program Assistant). The team worked under the guidance of Arup Banerji (Country Director), Elisabetta Capannelli (Country Manager) and Gallina Andronova Vincelette (Practice Manager). Preparation of the policy note Regional Availability of Social Services was led by Aleksandra Posarac (Lead Economist and Program Leader for Human Development in Southern Africa). The lead author of the policy note is Lidija Japec (Consultant) with contributions from Ivan Drabek (Senior Social Protec- tion Specialist) and Aleksandra Posarac. Preparation of the policy note was guided by Cem Mete as Practice Manager for Social Protection and Jobs Global Practice for Europe and Central Asia, and Lars M. Sondergaard as Program Leader, for Human Development for European Union Member States. The policy note team thanks the following individuals and organizations in Croatia: • the Ministry of Regional Development and EU Funds for overall coordination and guidance, especially Ana Odak, the Assistant Minister, and her team; • the Ministry of Demography, Family, Youth and Social Policy, especially Maja Vucinic Knezevic, the Assistant Minister, and her team for meetings and consultations that have informed the policy note.
    [Show full text]
  • Članci Republika Srpska Krajina and the Right of Peoples to Self-Determination*
    ČLANCI PETER RADAN, PhD, Professor of Law Macquarie University, Sydney Sydney, New South Wels, 2109, Australia [email protected] UDK: 341.231 originalan naučni rad 323.1(497.5) primljeno: 17. maj 2017. prihvaćeno: 11. oktobar 2017. DOI: 10.29362/IST20VEKA.2018.1.RAD.9-34 REPUBLIKA SRPSKA KRAJINA AND THE RIGHT * OF PEOPLES TO SELF-DETERMINATION ABSTRACT: In Part I of this article author details the claims to inde- pendent statehood of Croatia and Krajina based upon the right of peoples to self-determination in the context of the emergence of nationalism as a powerful political force in Yugoslavia in the early 1990s. He also details the response of the international community to the crisis which these irreconcilable claims gave rise to. In Part II author explores the reasons why the secession of Croatia suc- ceeded and the secession of Krajina failed. Finally, the ramifications of Croa- tia’s and Krajina’s competing claims to statehood for the right of peoples to self-determination are discussed in the Conclusion. KEYWORDS: Republika Srpska Krajina, The break-up of Yugoslavia, War in Croatia 1991–1995, International Law, Self-determination, Secession, Inter-ethnic relations, National Minorities, Serbs in Croatia, Nationalism Introduction On 9 November 1989 the Berlin Wall came down. More than any other, this event of that tumultuous year symbolised the end of the Cold War and ush- ered in what Allen Buchanan has called ‘the age of secession’.1 The usual justi- fication for secessionist demands was the right of peoples to self-determination. One of the means by which this right is realised is by ‘the establishment of a sovereign and independent state’.2 The critical question for self-determination relates to the meaning of ‘peoples’.
    [Show full text]
  • 27 September 2005
    Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe OSCE Mission to Croatia News in brief 13 - 27 September 2005 ICTY refers Norac/Ademi indictment to Croatia On 14 September, the Referral Bench of the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY) transferred the indictment against Mirko Norac and Rahim Ademi to Croatia under Rule 11 bis of the ICTY Rules. Norac and Ademi are indicted for war crimes allegedly committed against Serb civilians and soldiers hors de combat during a 1993 operation by the Croatian military in the so-called “Medak Pocket” in south-western Croatia. They are alleged to be individually responsible as well as responsible as superiors (“command responsibility”) for acts of subordinates. Ademi voluntarily surrendered to the ICTY in 2001 and has been at liberty in Croatia since 2002. Norac is currently serving a 12- year prison sentence handed down by the Rijeka County Court for unrelated war crimes committed in the Gospic area. The Referral Bench granted the transfer to Croatia after finding the crimes not so serious as to prevent referral; that differences between Croatian and ICTY law are not so substantial as to prevent referral; domestic law sufficiently appropriate; witness protection measures adequate and measures for availability of witnesses, including witnesses from abroad adequate – finding relies in part on the Mission Status Report of November 2004 on improved inter-state cooperation; appropriate measures in place to ensure fair trial, both for defendants as well as to ensure fairness toward Serb victims; death penalty will not be imposed; and monitoring mechanism in place with OSCE.
    [Show full text]
  • Arijana Kolak Bošnjak (Croatia) Croatian Institute of History Zagreb [email protected]
    Arijana Kolak Bošnjak Attempts to Introduce the Hungarian Language in Croatian Schools in the First Half of the 19th Century Review article UDK 373.3(497.5=511.141) 811.511.141(497.5)(091) Arijana Kolak Bošnjak (Croatia) Croatian Institute of History Zagreb [email protected] ATTEMPTS TO INTRODUCE THE HUNGARIAN LANGUAGE IN CROATIAN SCHOOLS IN THE FIRST HALF OF THE 19TH CENTURY Abstract In the first half of the 19th century, the national conflict between Croatians and Hungarians manifested itself most prominently in the language issue, particularly in the matter of introducing Hungarian as the official language in the whole territory of Hungary, including Civil Croatia. This paper will depict Hungarian attempts to introduce the Hungarian language in Croatian schools, based on an analysis of conclusions of the Croatian Diet, various reports and other documents of this period. Hungarians were partially successful in their attempt. In 1833, Hungarian became a compulsory school subject in Croatian schools, but Hungarians did not manage to introduce it as the language of instruction, which gave rise to disputes in the 1840s. In spite of all Hungarian efforts, the attempt to spread Hungarian through schools in Civil Croatia remained futile. Keywords: Hungarian language, Croatian schools, first half of the 19th century Arijana Kolak Bošnjak Attempts to Introduce the Hungarian Language in Croatian Schools in the First Half of the 19th Century Introduction The language issue marked two important periods of the Hungarian history, the Enlightenment (1772-1825) and the period of reforms (1830- 1848). In the former, the role of the national language gained importance as part of Enlightenment ideas, primarily the idea of an individual’s and a people’s progress based on education in the national language.
    [Show full text]
  • “Diaspora” During the War in Yugoslavia Global Studies
    CENTER FOR Global Studies Project on Global Migration and Transnational Politics ISSN 1941-7586 The Invention of the Croatian Diaspora: Unpacking the Politics of “Diaspora” During the War in Yugoslavia Francesco Ragazzi Ph.D. candidate Institut d’Etudes Politiques (Paris) and Northwestern University (Chicago) Global Migration and Transnational Politics Working Paper no. 10 November 2009 The Center for Global Studies at George Mason University was founded to promote multidisciplinary research on globalization. The Center comprises more than 100 associated faculty members whose collective expertise spans the full range of disciplines. The Center sponsors CGS Working Groups, publishes the Global Studies Review, and conducts research on a broad range of themes. The Project on Global Migration and Transnational Politics, a partnership between CGS and the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation, investigates how political dynamics around the globe have been transformed by new patterns of human mobility and the development of innovative transnational social networks. The project sponsors research workshops, working papers, and conferences that all focus on developing a new research agenda for understanding how global migration has transformed politics. WEB: cgs.gmu.edu ISSN 1941-7586 Francesco Ragazzi The Invention of the Croatian Diaspora: Unpacking the Politics of “Diaspora” During the War in Yugoslavia Francesco Ragazzi Ph.D. candidate, Institut d’Etudes Politiques (Paris) and Northwestern University (Chicago) Abstract: The Croatian “diaspora” is an invention of the 1990’s. Over the course of the 20th- century, Croats living abroad were traditionally divided into three socio-political categories: “old emigrants,” “political émigrés” and “guest workers.” At the turn of the 1990’s, rising ethnic tensions in Yugoslavia pushed these groups towards a short-lived unity when diasporic organizations provided a vast humanitarian, military and lobbying support for the newly founded state of Croatia.
    [Show full text]
  • Shadow Report on the Implementation of the Framework Convention for Protection of National Minorities in the Republic of Croatia
    Center for Peace, Legal Advice and Psychosocial Assistance SHADOW REPORT ON THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE FRAMEWORK CONVENTION FOR PROTECTION OF NATIONAL MINORITIES IN THE REPUBLIC OF CROATIA Third monitoring cycle 2004 – 2010 February 2010 0 CONTENT I Information on the Center for Peace, Legal Advice and Psychosocial Assistance 2 II Introductory Remarks on the Shadow Report 3 III Application of the Convention Article by Article 6 Article 3 6 Article 4 8 Article 5 15 Article 6 16 Article 7 19 Article 8 19 Article 9 20 Articles 10 and 11 23 Articles 12, 13 and 14 28 Article 15 30 Article 16 39 IV Action Plan of the Republic of Croatia for the Implementation of the Constitutional Law on the Rights of National Minorities, June 2008 40 V Concluding Remarks and Recommendations 42 1 I Information on the Center for Peace, Legal Advice and Psychosocial Assistance – Vukovar Center for Peace, Legal Advice and Psychosocial Assistance is local, nongovernmental, non-political, non-partisan, nonprofit, humanitarian association that works on protection and promotion of human rights, development of democracy and interethnic relations in the Republic of Croatia. The Center was established on and works since 1 August 1996. Main activities of the Center: - Provision of free legal advices and free legal aid, - Reporting on and analyzing human rights situation, with special attention paid to the rights of refugees, displaced persons and persons belonging to national minorities in the Republic of Croatia, - Provision of informative and technical support to citizens, civil initiatives and economy development initiatives, - Campaigning and advocacy, - Monitoring of the work of courts of law and state administration bodies, - Organization of conferences, seminars, trainings, workshops, roundtables and public discussions, - Cooperation with relevant governmental and nongovernmental organizations in the Republic of Croatia as well as foreign and international nongovernmental organizations, and international organizations.
    [Show full text]
  • Constitutional Law on the Rights of National Minorities in the Republic of Croatia
    Antonija Petričušić * Constitutional Law on the Rights of National Minorities in the Republic of Croatia I. I is article explores the disposition of the new Croatian Constitutional Law on the Rights of National Minorities (hereinafter “the Constitutional Law” or “the Law”)1 adopted on December . e legislation previously governing the protection of minority rights was politically an extremely controversial and much-discussed law, and was amended and suspended quite a number of times in its existence of just over ten years. e adop- tion of the Constitutional Law was one of Croatia’s international obligations upon entry into the Council of Europe (CoE),2 as well as an imperative for implementation of the European Union Association and Stabilization Agreement.3 Even at the Law’s drafting phase, the European Commission for Democracy through Law (hereinafter “the Venice Commission”) concluded that it constituted “an important step forward in the protection of national minorities in Croatia. It provides a comprehensive and coherent framework for further legislative and regulatory action in the field of minorities’ protection”.4 e Law was drafted on the blueprint of the Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities (FCNM), and therefore applies the most generally accepted stan- dards in minority protection. * Researcher at the European Academy of Bolzano/Bozen, Italy. e author wishes to thank her colleagues Emma Lantschner, Francesco Palermo and Jens Woelk for their useful comments to a draft of this article. 1 Constitutional Law on the Rights of National Minorities in the Republic of Croatia in Croatian language can be found in the Narodne Novine (hereinafter “Official Gazette”) 155/2002.
    [Show full text]