DOCSLIB.ORG

Queen of Angels Bio Assessment

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Queen of Angels Bio Assessment David Magney Environmental Consulting BIOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT OF QUEEN OF ANGELS CHURCH LOMPOC, CALIFORNIA Prepared for: COUNTY OF SANTA BARBARA OFFICE OF PLANNINGAND DEVELOPMENT On behalf of: CRC ENTERPRISES JANUARY 2013 Mission Statement To provide quality environmental consulting services with integrity that protect and enhance the human and natural environment www.magney.org DMEC Biological Assessment of Queen of Angels Church Lompoc, California Prepared for: County of Santa Barbara Office of Planning and Development 123 East Anapamu Street Santa Barbara, CA 93001 Contact: Doug Anthony, Deputy Director (North County) Phone: 805/568-2046 On behalf of: CRC Enterprises 27600 Bouquet Canyon Road Santa Clarita, California 91350 Prepared by: David Magney Environmental Consulting P.O. Box 1346 Ojai, CA 93024-1346 Contact: David L. Magney 805/646-6045 22 January 2013 www.magney.org This document should be cited as: David Magney Environmental Consulting. 2013. Biological Assessment for Queen of Angels Church, Lompoc, California. 22 January 2013 v1.2. (PN 12-0101) Ojai, California. Prepared for County of Santa Barbara Office Planning and Development, Santa Barbara, California. Prepared on behalf of CRC Enterprises, Santa Clarita, California. CRC Enterprises – Queen of Angels Church Biological Assessment Project No. 12-0101 22 January 2013 DMEC Page i Table of Contents Page SUMMARY............................................................................................................ 1 SECTION 1. CONSTRUCTION FOOTPRINT DESCRIPTION...................... 2 1.1 PROJECT LOCATION ........................................................................................ 2 SECTION 2. SURVEY AREA DESCRIPTION AND METHODS ................... 5 2.1 SURVEY PURPOSE....................................................................................... 5 2.2 SURVEY AREA DESCRIPTION ................................................................... 5 Survey Area 1 (SA1)......................................................................................................... 6 Location ..................................................................................................................... 6 Survey Area Boundaries.............................................................................................. 6 Survey Area Environmental Setting ............................................................................. 6 Surrounding Area Environmental Setting..................................................................... 6 Cover.......................................................................................................................... 6 Survey Area 2 (SA2)......................................................................................................... 7 Location ..................................................................................................................... 7 Survey Area Boundaries.............................................................................................. 7 Survey Area Environmental Setting ............................................................................. 7 Surrounding Area Environmental Setting..................................................................... 7 Cover.......................................................................................................................... 7 2.3 METHODOLOGY .......................................................................................... 9 SECTION 3. BIOLOGICAL INVENTORY....................................................... 12 3.1 PLANT COMMUNITIES .................................................................................... 12 Plant Communities/Habitats .............................................................................................. 12 Major Plant Communities Summary............................................................................ 12 Plant Community Descriptions .......................................................................................... 12 Herbaceous Communities............................................................................................ 13 Woodland Communities .............................................................................................. 18 Developed/Disturbed................................................................................................... 19 Landscaping................................................................................................................ 19 Waters and Wetlands......................................................................................................... 22 3.2 PLANT AND ANIMAL SPECIES ....................................................................... 22 Flora................................................................................................................................. 22 Vascular Plant Flora ................................................................................................... 22 Lichen Flora ............................................................................................................... 23 Bryophyte Flora.......................................................................................................... 24 Fungus Flora............................................................................................................... 24 Y:\DMEC\JOBS\SANTABARBARA\CRC_ENTERPRISES\LOMPOCQUEENOFANGELSCHURCH\DMEC_BIOASSESSENT_REPORT-QUEEN_OF_ANGELS-20121230V1.2.DOC CRC Enterprises – Queen of Angels Church Biological Assessment Project No. 12-0101 22 January 2013 DMEC Page ii Fauna................................................................................................................................ 25 Endangered, Threatened, Rare, and Locally Important Species and Nests (Initial Study Checklist A & E)......................................................................................................... 26 Special-status Species Summary........................................................................................ 26 Definitions .................................................................................................................. 26 CNDDB SEARCH RESULTS..................................................................................... 28 Special-status Plants.......................................................................................................... 30 Special-status Plant Species Descriptions .................................................................... 36 Special-status Lichen Species Descriptions.................................................................. 40 Special-status Wildlife....................................................................................................... 41 Sensitive Habitats.............................................................................................................. 46 3.3 WILDLIFE MOVEMENT AND CONNECTIVITY............................................. 46 SECTION 4. IMPACT ASSESSMENT............................................................... 47 SECTION 5. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS............................................................ 48 SECTION 6. CITATIONS ................................................................................... 49 REFERENCES CITED ............................................................................................... 49 APPENDICES ....................................................................................................... 51 APPENDIX A – PLANT SPECIES OBSERVED ONSITE......................................... A-1 APPENDIX B – WILDLIFE SPECIES OBSERVED ONSITE ................................... B-1 LIST OF TABLES Page 1 Plant Communities of the Project Site ....................................................................... 20 2 Definitions of Special-status Species ......................................................................... 27 3 California Native Plant Society Rare Plant Ranks ...................................................... 28 4 California Native Plant Society Rank Threat Code Extensions................................... 28 5 California Natural Diversity Database Element Ranking System................................ 29 6 Special-status Plants Observed and Potentially Present on Queen of Angels Property................................................................................................................... 31 7 Special-status Wildlife Potentially Present at the Queen of Angels Property............... 42 8 CNDDB Sensitive Habitats Observed at, and Known Near, the Queen of Angels Property ................................................................................................................... 46 Y:\DMEC\JOBS\SANTABARBARA\CRC_ENTERPRISES\LOMPOCQUEENOFANGELSCHURCH\DMEC_BIOASSESSENT_REPORT-QUEEN_OF_ANGELS-20121230V1.2.DOC CRC Enterprises – Queen of Angels Church Biological Assessment Project No. 12-0101 22 January 2013 DMEC Page iii LIST OF FIGURES Page 1 General Project Site Location Map ........................................................................... 3 2 Map of Project Site................................................................................................... 4 3 Map of Survey Areas ................................................................................................ 8 4 Map of Plant Communities on Queen of Angels Property.......................................... 21 5 Map of Special-status
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Grow Native Nursery Inventory
    Grow Native Nursery Inventory As of Nov 2, 2020 Quantity Scientific Name Common Name Size Available Price Abutilon palmeri Indian Mallow 4 In 32 $ 6.00 Acalypha californica California Copperleaf 4 In 10 $ 6.00 Adenostoma fasciculatum Chamise 1 Gal 2 $ 10.00 Adiantum capillus veneris Maidenhair Fern 4 In 27 $ 8.00 Agave deserti Desert Agave 1 Gal 13 $ 15.00 Agave sebastiana 'Dwarf Form' Small Form Sebastian's Agave 3 Gal 1 $ 45.00 Agave sebastiana 'Dwarf Form' Small Form Sebastian's Agave 4 In 2 $ 28.00 Alnus rhombifolia White Alder 1 Gal 5 $ 12.00 Aloysia wrightii Oreganillo 1 Gal 15 $ 12.00 Aloysia wrightii Oreganillo 4 In 12 $ 6.00 Amauria rotundifolia Baja Rock Daisy 1 Gal 5 $ 10.00 Aquilegia formosa Western Columbine 4 In 5 $ 6.00 Arctostaphylos 'Austin Griffiths' Austin Griffiths' Manzanita 1 Gal 14 $ 12.00 Arctostaphylos 'Dr. Hurd' Dr. Hurd Manzanita 1 Gal 23 $ 12.00 Arctostaphylos edmundsii Little Sur Manzanita 1 Gal 1 $ 12.00 Arctostaphylos edmundsii 'Carmel Sur' Carmel Sur Manzanita 4 In 38 $ 6.00 Arctostaphylos 'Emerald Carpet' Emerald Carpet Manzanita 4 In 6 $ 7.00 Arctostaphylos glandulosa ssp. mollis Santa Monica Mountains Manzanita 1 Gal 1 $ 12.00 Arctostaphylos glauca Bigberry Manzanita 1 Gal 1 $ 12.00 Arctostaphylos 'John Dourley' John Dourley's Manzanita 1 Gal 12 $ 12.00 Arctostaphylos 'Ken Taylor' Ken Taylor's Manzanita 1 Gal 6 $ 12.00 Arctostaphylos 'Lester Rowntree' Lester Rowntree's Manzanita 1 Gal 16 $ 12.00 Arctostaphylos morroensis Morro Bay Manzanita 1 Gal 4 $ 12.00 Arctostaphylos 'Pacific Mist' Pacific Mist Manzanita
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogeny of the Cetrarioid Core (Parmeliaceae) Based on Five
    The Lichenologist 41(5): 489–511 (2009) © 2009 British Lichen Society doi:10.1017/S0024282909990090 Printed in the United Kingdom Phylogeny of the cetrarioid core (Parmeliaceae) based on five genetic markers Arne THELL, Filip HÖGNABBA, John A. ELIX, Tassilo FEUERER, Ingvar KÄRNEFELT, Leena MYLLYS, Tiina RANDLANE, Andres SAAG, Soili STENROOS, Teuvo AHTI and Mark R. D. SEAWARD Abstract: Fourteen genera belong to a monophyletic core of cetrarioid lichens, Ahtiana, Allocetraria, Arctocetraria, Cetraria, Cetrariella, Cetreliopsis, Flavocetraria, Kaernefeltia, Masonhalea, Nephromopsis, Tuckermanella, Tuckermannopsis, Usnocetraria and Vulpicida. A total of 71 samples representing 65 species (of 90 worldwide) and all type species of the genera are included in phylogentic analyses based on a complete ITS matrix and incomplete sets of group I intron, -tubulin, GAPDH and mtSSU sequences. Eleven of the species included in the study are analysed phylogenetically for the first time, and of the 178 sequences, 67 are newly constructed. Two phylogenetic trees, one based solely on the complete ITS-matrix and a second based on total information, are similar, but not entirely identical. About half of the species are gathered in a strongly supported clade composed of the genera Allocetraria, Cetraria s. str., Cetrariella and Vulpicida. Arctocetraria, Cetreliopsis, Kaernefeltia and Tuckermanella are monophyletic genera, whereas Cetraria, Flavocetraria and Tuckermannopsis are polyphyletic. The taxonomy in current use is compared with the phylogenetic results, and future, probable or potential adjustments to the phylogeny are discussed. The single non-DNA character with a strong correlation to phylogeny based on DNA-sequences is conidial shape. The secondary chemistry of the poorly known species Cetraria annae is analyzed for the first time; the cortex contains usnic acid and atranorin, whereas isonephrosterinic, nephrosterinic, lichesterinic, protolichesterinic and squamatic acids occur in the medulla.
    [Show full text]
  • Sarah K. Gess and Friedrich W. Gess
    Pollen wasps and flowers in southern Africa Sarah K. Gess and Friedrich W. Gess SANBI Biodiversity Series 18 Pollen wasps and flowers in southern Africa by Sarah K. Gess and Friedrich W. Gess Department of Entomology, Albany Museum and Rhodes University, Grahamstown Pretoria 2010 SANBI Biodiversity Series The South African National Biodiversity Institute (SANBI) was established on 1 September 2004 through the signing into force of the National Environmental Management: Biodiversity Act (NEMBA) No. 10 of 2004 by President Thabo Mbeki. The Act expands the mandate of the former National Botanical Institute to include responsibilities relating to the full diversity of South Africa’s fauna and flora, and builds on the internationally respected programmes in conservation, research, education and visitor services developed by the National Botanical Institute and its predecessors over the past century. The vision of SANBI: Biodiversity richness for all South Africans. SANBI’s mission is to champion the exploration, conservation, sustainable use, appreciation and enjoyment of South Africa’s exceptionally rich biodiversity for all people. SANBI Biodiversity Series publishes occasional reports on projects, technologies, workshops, symposia and other activities initiated by or executed in partnership with SANBI. Technical editor: Emsie du Plessis Design & layout: Bob Greyvenstein Cover design: Bob Greyvenstein How to cite this publication GESS, S.K. & GESS, F.W. 2010. Pollen wasps and flowers in southern Africa. SANBI Biodiversity Series 18. South African National Biodiversity Institute, Pretoria. ISBN 978-1-919976-60-0 © Published by: South African National Biodiversity Institute. Obtainable from: SANBI Bookshop, Private Bag X101, Pretoria, 0001 South Africa. Tel.: +27 12 843-5000.
    [Show full text]
  • Outline of Angiosperm Phylogeny
    Outline of angiosperm phylogeny: orders, families, and representative genera with emphasis on Oregon native plants Priscilla Spears December 2013 The following listing gives an introduction to the phylogenetic classification of the flowering plants that has emerged in recent decades, and which is based on nucleic acid sequences as well as morphological and developmental data. This listing emphasizes temperate families of the Northern Hemisphere and is meant as an overview with examples of Oregon native plants. It includes many exotic genera that are grown in Oregon as ornamentals plus other plants of interest worldwide. The genera that are Oregon natives are printed in a blue font. Genera that are exotics are shown in black, however genera in blue may also contain non-native species. Names separated by a slash are alternatives or else the nomenclature is in flux. When several genera have the same common name, the names are separated by commas. The order of the family names is from the linear listing of families in the APG III report. For further information, see the references on the last page. Basal Angiosperms (ANITA grade) Amborellales Amborellaceae, sole family, the earliest branch of flowering plants, a shrub native to New Caledonia – Amborella Nymphaeales Hydatellaceae – aquatics from Australasia, previously classified as a grass Cabombaceae (water shield – Brasenia, fanwort – Cabomba) Nymphaeaceae (water lilies – Nymphaea; pond lilies – Nuphar) Austrobaileyales Schisandraceae (wild sarsaparilla, star vine – Schisandra; Japanese
    [Show full text]
  • Conceptual Design Documentation
    Appendix A: Conceptual Design Documentation APPENDIX A Conceptual Design Documentation June 2019 A-1 APPENDIX A: CONCEPTUAL DESIGN DOCUMENTATION The environmental analyses in the NEPA and CEQA documents for the proposed improvements at Oceano County Airport (the Airport) are based on conceptual designs prepared to provide a realistic basis for assessing their environmental consequences. 1. Widen runway from 50 to 60 feet 2. Widen Taxiways A, A-1, A-2, A-3, and A-4 from 20 to 25 feet 3. Relocate segmented circle and wind cone 4. Installation of taxiway edge lighting 5. Installation of hold position signage 6. Installation of a new electrical vault and connections 7. Installation of a pollution control facility (wash rack) CIVIL ENGINEERING CALCULATIONS The purpose of this conceptual design effort is to identify the amount of impervious surface, grading (cut and fill) and drainage implications of the projects identified above. The conceptual design calculations detailed in the following figures indicate that Projects 1 and 2, widening the runways and taxiways would increase the total amount of impervious surface on the Airport by 32,016 square feet, or 0.73 acres; a 6.6 percent increase in the Airport’s impervious surface area. Drainage patterns would remain the same as both the runway and taxiways would continue to sheet flow from their centerlines to the edge of pavement and then into open, grassed areas. The existing drainage system is able to accommodate the modest increase in stormwater runoff that would occur, particularly as soil conditions on the Airport are conducive to infiltration. Figure A-1 shows the locations of the seven projects incorporated in the Proposed Action.
    [Show full text]
  • Indigenous Plants of Bendigo
    Produced by Indigenous Plants of Bendigo Indigenous Plants of Bendigo PMS 1807 RED PMS 432 GREY PMS 142 GOLD A Gardener’s Guide to Growing and Protecting Local Plants 3rd Edition 9 © Copyright City of Greater Bendigo and Bendigo Native Plant Group Inc. This work is Copyright. Apart from any use permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part may be reproduced by any process without prior written permission from the City of Greater Bendigo. First Published 2004 Second Edition 2007 Third Edition 2013 Printed by Bendigo Modern Press: www.bmp.com.au This book is also available on the City of Greater Bendigo website: www.bendigo.vic.gov.au Printed on 100% recycled paper. Disclaimer “The information contained in this publication is of a general nature only. This publication is not intended to provide a definitive analysis, or discussion, on each issue canvassed. While the Committee/Council believes the information contained herein is correct, it does not accept any liability whatsoever/howsoever arising from reliance on this publication. Therefore, readers should make their own enquiries, and conduct their own investigations, concerning every issue canvassed herein.” Front cover - Clockwise from centre top: Bendigo Wax-flower (Pam Sheean), Hoary Sunray (Marilyn Sprague), Red Ironbark (Pam Sheean), Green Mallee (Anthony Sheean), Whirrakee Wattle (Anthony Sheean). Table of contents Acknowledgements ...............................................2 Foreword..........................................................3 Introduction.......................................................4
    [Show full text]
  • Lichen Functional Trait Variation Along an East-West Climatic Gradient in Oregon and Among Habitats in Katmai National Park, Alaska
    AN ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS OF Kaleigh Spickerman for the degree of Master of Science in Botany and Plant Pathology presented on June 11, 2015 Title: Lichen Functional Trait Variation Along an East-West Climatic Gradient in Oregon and Among Habitats in Katmai National Park, Alaska Abstract approved: ______________________________________________________ Bruce McCune Functional traits of vascular plants have been an important component of ecological studies for a number of years; however, in more recent times vascular plant ecologists have begun to formalize a set of key traits and universal system of trait measurement. Many recent studies hypothesize global generality of trait patterns, which would allow for comparison among ecosystems and biomes and provide a foundation for general rules and theories, the so-called “Holy Grail” of ecology. However, the majority of these studies focus on functional trait patterns of vascular plants, with a minority examining the patterns of cryptograms such as lichens. Lichens are an important component of many ecosystems due to their contributions to biodiversity and their key ecosystem services, such as contributions to mineral and hydrological cycles and ecosystem food webs. Lichens are also of special interest because of their reliance on atmospheric deposition for nutrients and water, which makes them particularly sensitive to air pollution. Therefore, they are often used as bioindicators of air pollution, climate change, and general ecosystem health. This thesis examines the functional trait patterns of lichens in two contrasting regions with fundamentally different kinds of data. To better understand the patterns of lichen functional traits, we examined reproductive, morphological, and chemical trait variation along precipitation and temperature gradients in Oregon.
    [Show full text]
  • Rinconada Checklist-02Jun19
    Checklist1 of Vascular Flora of Rinconada Mine and Rinconada Trail San Luis Obispo County, California (2 June 2019) David J. Keil Robert F. Hoover Herbarium Biological Sciences Department California Polytechnic State University San Luis Obispo, California Scientific Name Common Name Family Rare n ❀ Achyrachaena mollis blow wives ASTERACEAE o n ❀ Acmispon americanus var. americanus Spanish-clover FABACEAE o n Acmispon brachycarpus shortpod deervetch FABACEAE v n ❀ Acmispon glaber var. glaber common deerweed FABACEAE o n Acmispon parviflorus miniature deervetch FABACEAE o n ❀ Acmispon strigosus strigose deer-vetch FABACEAE o 1 Please notify the author of additions or corrections to this list ([email protected]). ❀ — See Wildflowers of San Luis Obispo, California, second edition (2018) for photograph. Most are illustrated in the first edition as well; old names for some species in square brackets. n — California native i — exotic species, introduced to California, naturalized or waif. v — documented by one or more specimens (Consortium of California Herbaria record; specimen in OBI; or collection that has not yet been accessioned) o — observed during field surveys; no voucher specimen known Rare—California Rare Plant Rank Scientific Name Common Name Family Rare n Acmispon wrangelianus California deervetch FABACEAE v n ❀ Acourtia microcephala sacapelote ASTERACEAE o n ❀ Adelinia grandis Pacific hound's tongue BORAGINACEAE v n ❀ Adenostoma fasciculatum var. chamise ROSACEAE o fasciculatum n Adiantum jordanii California maidenhair fern PTERIDACEAE o n Agastache urticifolia nettle-leaved horsemint LAMIACEAE v n ❀ Agoseris grandiflora var. grandiflora large-flowered mountain-dandelion ASTERACEAE v n Agoseris heterophylla var. cryptopleura annual mountain-dandelion ASTERACEAE v n Agoseris heterophylla var. heterophylla annual mountain-dandelion ASTERACEAE o i Aira caryophyllea silver hairgrass POACEAE o n Allium fimbriatum var.
    [Show full text]
  • Section 5 References
    Section 5 References 5.0 REFERENCES Akçakaya, H. R. and J. L. Atwood. 1997. A habitat-based metapopulation model of the California Gnatcatcher. Conservation Biology 11:422-434. Akçakaya, H.R. 1998. RAMAS GIS: Linking landscape data with population viability analysis (version 3.0). Applied Biomathematics, Setaauket, New York. Anderson, D.W. and J.W. Hickey. 1970. Eggshell changes in certain North American birds. Ed. K. H. Voous. Proc. (XVth) Inter. Ornith. Congress, pp 514-540. E.J. Brill, Leiden, Netherlands. Anderson, D.W., J.R. Jehl, Jr., R.W. Risebrough, L.A. Woods, Jr., L.R. Deweese, and W.G. Edgecomb. 1975. Brown pelicans: improved reproduction of the southern California coast. Science 190:806-808. Atwood, J.L. 1980. The United States distribution of the California black-tailed gnatcatcher. Western Birds 11: 65-78. Atwood, J.L. 1990. Status review of the California gnatcatcher (Polioptila californica). Unpublished Technical Report, Manomet Bird Observatory, Manomet, Massachusetts. Atwood, J.L. 1992. A maximum estimate of the California gnatcatcher’s population size in the United States. Western Birds. 23:1-9. Atwood, J.L. and J.S. Bolsinger. 1992. Elevational distribution of California gnatcatchers in the United States. Journal of Field Ornithology 63:159-168. Atwood, J.L., S.H. Tsai, C.H. Reynolds, M.R. Fugagli. 1998. Factors affecting estimates of California gnatcatcher territory size. Western Birds 29: 269-279. Baharav, D. 1975. Movement of the horned lizard Phrynosoma solare. Copeia 1975: 649-657. Barry, W.J. 1988. Management of sensitive plants in California state parks. Fremontia 16(2):16-20. Beauchamp, R.M.
    [Show full text]
  • Pala Park Habitat Assessment
    Pala Park Bank Stabilization Project: Geotechnical Exploration TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION 1.0 COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ATTACHMENTS Biological Report Summary Report (Attachment E-3) Level of Significance Checklist (Attachment E-4) Biological Resources Map (Attachment E-5) Site Photographs (Attachment E-6) SECTION 2.0 HABITAT ASSESSMENT General Site Information ............................................................................................................... 1 Methods ........................................................................................................................................ 2 Existing Conditions ....................................................................................................................... 4 Special Status Resources ............................................................................................................. 8 Other Issues ................................................................................................................................ 14 Recommendations ...................................................................................................................... 14 References .................................................................................................................................. 16 LIST OF TABLES Page 1 Special Status Plant Species Known to Occur in the Vicinity of the Survey Area ........... 10 2 Chaparral Sand-Verbena Populations Observed in the Survey Area ............................. 12 3 Paniculate Tarplant
    [Show full text]
  • One Hundred New Species of Lichenized Fungi: a Signature of Undiscovered Global Diversity
    Phytotaxa 18: 1–127 (2011) ISSN 1179-3155 (print edition) www.mapress.com/phytotaxa/ Monograph PHYTOTAXA Copyright © 2011 Magnolia Press ISSN 1179-3163 (online edition) PHYTOTAXA 18 One hundred new species of lichenized fungi: a signature of undiscovered global diversity H. THORSTEN LUMBSCH1*, TEUVO AHTI2, SUSANNE ALTERMANN3, GUILLERMO AMO DE PAZ4, ANDRÉ APTROOT5, ULF ARUP6, ALEJANDRINA BÁRCENAS PEÑA7, PAULINA A. BAWINGAN8, MICHEL N. BENATTI9, LUISA BETANCOURT10, CURTIS R. BJÖRK11, KANSRI BOONPRAGOB12, MAARTEN BRAND13, FRANK BUNGARTZ14, MARCELA E. S. CÁCERES15, MEHTMET CANDAN16, JOSÉ LUIS CHAVES17, PHILIPPE CLERC18, RALPH COMMON19, BRIAN J. COPPINS20, ANA CRESPO4, MANUELA DAL-FORNO21, PRADEEP K. DIVAKAR4, MELIZAR V. DUYA22, JOHN A. ELIX23, ARVE ELVEBAKK24, JOHNATHON D. FANKHAUSER25, EDIT FARKAS26, LIDIA ITATÍ FERRARO27, EBERHARD FISCHER28, DAVID J. GALLOWAY29, ESTER GAYA30, MIREIA GIRALT31, TREVOR GOWARD32, MARTIN GRUBE33, JOSEF HAFELLNER33, JESÚS E. HERNÁNDEZ M.34, MARÍA DE LOS ANGELES HERRERA CAMPOS7, KLAUS KALB35, INGVAR KÄRNEFELT6, GINTARAS KANTVILAS36, DOROTHEE KILLMANN28, PAUL KIRIKA37, KERRY KNUDSEN38, HARALD KOMPOSCH39, SERGEY KONDRATYUK40, JAMES D. LAWREY21, ARMIN MANGOLD41, MARCELO P. MARCELLI9, BRUCE MCCUNE42, MARIA INES MESSUTI43, ANDREA MICHLIG27, RICARDO MIRANDA GONZÁLEZ7, BIBIANA MONCADA10, ALIFERETI NAIKATINI44, MATTHEW P. NELSEN1, 45, DAG O. ØVSTEDAL46, ZDENEK PALICE47, KHWANRUAN PAPONG48, SITTIPORN PARNMEN12, SERGIO PÉREZ-ORTEGA4, CHRISTIAN PRINTZEN49, VÍCTOR J. RICO4, EIMY RIVAS PLATA1, 50, JAVIER ROBAYO51, DANIA ROSABAL52, ULRIKE RUPRECHT53, NORIS SALAZAR ALLEN54, LEOPOLDO SANCHO4, LUCIANA SANTOS DE JESUS15, TAMIRES SANTOS VIEIRA15, MATTHIAS SCHULTZ55, MARK R. D. SEAWARD56, EMMANUËL SÉRUSIAUX57, IMKE SCHMITT58, HARRIE J. M. SIPMAN59, MOHAMMAD SOHRABI 2, 60, ULRIK SØCHTING61, MAJBRIT ZEUTHEN SØGAARD61, LAURENS B. SPARRIUS62, ADRIANO SPIELMANN63, TOBY SPRIBILLE33, JUTARAT SUTJARITTURAKAN64, ACHRA THAMMATHAWORN65, ARNE THELL6, GÖRAN THOR66, HOLGER THÜS67, EINAR TIMDAL68, CAMILLE TRUONG18, ROMAN TÜRK69, LOENGRIN UMAÑA TENORIO17, DALIP K.
    [Show full text]
  • University Micrcxilms International 300 N
    A TAXONOMIC STUDY OF THE LENNOACEAE. Item Type text; Thesis-Reproduction (electronic) Authors Yatskievych, George Alfred, 1957- Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. Download date 23/09/2021 14:29:13 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/274684 INFORMATION TO USERS This reproduction was made from a copy of a document sent to us for microfilming. While the most advanced technology has been used to photograph and reproduce this document, the quality of the reproduction is heavily dependent upon the quality of the material submitted. The following explanation of techniques is provided to help clarify markings or notations which may appear on this reproduction. 1. The sign or "target" for pages apparently lacking from the document photographed is "Missing Page(s)". If it was possible to obtain the missing page(s) or section, they are spliced into the film along with adjacent pages. This may have necessitated cutting through an image and duplicating adjacent pages to assure complete continuity. 2. When an image on the film is obliterated with a round black mark, it is an indication of either blurred copy because of movement during exposure, duplicate copy, or copyrighted materials that should not have been filmed. For blurred pages, a good image of the page can be found in the adjacent frame. If copyrighted materials were deleted, a target note will appear listing the pages in the adjacent frame.
    [Show full text]