North Atlantic Treaty Organization

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

North Atlantic Treaty Organization North Atlantic Treaty Organization Background Guide A CAHSMUN XVII Letter from the Director Dear Delegates, My name is David Deng and I have the distinct privilege to serve as the Director of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) for CAHSMUN 2021. Just two years ago, I found myself in the very back of the committee room, speaking only twice as a first-time delegate. Since then, I have come to develop an entrenched passion for the esoteric world that is Model United Nations. My journey in MUN has given me more than just an enriching academic experience; it has helped me rid my fear of public speaking, introduced me to various forms of government, and provided me a platform through which I can debate and discuss with others without judgement. Now, I can only hope to provide you, the delegates, with the same life-changing experience that I had. Make the most out of your time as a delegate, and channel your inner passion for change; we, the dais team, will help you when you need it, but it is up to you to make a difference in our ever-changing world. This year, NATO will feature two topics: The Rise of China’s Expansionism and Anti-Satellite Threats. Both topics are extremely pertinent to today’s world and should provide an in-depth experience into today's current events. I will be joined by Matthew Leung and Laura Choi who will be your chairs for NATO. We are all excited to see you debate and discuss the two topics we have chosen this year, and we are eager to see your upcoming growth as a delegate. I wish you the best of luck for your preparation and research, and I’m excited for the fruitful discourse this weekend will bring. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at [email protected]. I look forward to meeting you all this April! Godspeed, David Deng NATO Director - CAHSMUN 2021 Committee Description The aftermath of World War II left Europe in a state of political and economic turmoil, with the majority of the continent disorganized and unprepared for the rise of the Soviet Union (USSR). The Soviet Union’s propagandist mentality and pursuit of atomic weapons led to many leaders in Europe coming together and creating an alliance to oppose the rising threat of the USSR. Hence, on April 4, 1949, a twelve-state alliance committed to defence, conflict resolution, and individual liberty was born from a need to ensure security in Europe. With that, the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) was created.1 In the years following the consolidation of NATO, the alliance acted as a counterweight to the Soviet bloc, planning armed militancy and solving political disputes. The fundamental principle that NATO was built off, safeguarding the security and freedom of its members, applies to all member states and binds them to any decision NATO passes. In the case of an attack on one of its members, all countries in NATO are committed to declaring war; therefore, an attack on a country in NATO is an attack on the alliance itself. This long-standing principle of collective defence differentiates NATO from other UN organizations and is what promotes a sense of solidarity within the alliance. Following the collapse of the Soviet Union, NATO has been re-adjusting itself so it can fulfill an expanded role in the 21st century. Instead of focusing its efforts in Europe and North America, the alliance has also ventured into Asia-Pacific and African affairs as well. Through protecting non-NATO members and projecting their values globally, the alliance has become more than a military organization; its mandate has shifted towards global peacekeeping and conflict resolution. In conjunction with the UN, NATO has aided many countries in the fight for democracy and justice, using their political influence as a philanthropic tool. Delegates in NATO will simulate work in the North Atlantic Council (NAC). The NAC is the main decision-making body in NATO and oversees militaristic and political affairs that NATO deals with.2 The council consists of 29 member states that are legally bound to the mandate of NATO. The topic NATO will be discussing, the Rise of China’s Expansionism, deals with the implications of a growing Chinese threat. Delegates will have to work cohesively to confront the threat and ensure global peace is kept. 1 https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/declassified_139339.htm 2 www.nato.int/cps/en/natolive/topics_49763.htm. Topic Overview In past decades, Russia’s expansion of influence around the world has been a primary concern for NATO, whether it was during the Cold War or more recently in Ukraine. However, today, a shifting political landscape confronts NATO; as China seeks to expand, more and more Chinese firms and companies occupy crucial parts of Europe, gaining influence in assets as diverse as pipelines, ports, and satellite networks. Although China has the potential to be a close partner to countries in NATO, historically, under current Chinese president Xi Jinping, the country has ignored international law, stolen intellectual property, and violated cybersecurity regulations. China has also continued to exert influence in Asia-Pacific countries, expanding its Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) project—a revival of the 20th century Silk Road, which connected China with the rest of Asia and allowed them to easily trade with neighbouring countries in hopes of gaining future bargaining chips.3 China’s policies are a stark contrast to the progressive viewpoints of many in NATO and should be a cause of concern for the alliance’s members. These policies have divided China and the Western Bloc, creating a struggle for power that has not been seen since the Cold War. Acting as a counterweight to authoritarian regimes is not new to NATO member states. For years, NATO has fended off the Russian threat using tactics such as militarization and economic sanctions. However, the Chinese and Russian threats are fundamentally different. While countries during the Cold War took clear sides—either echoing their support for the Soviet Union or the United States—countries in the status quo have vested interests with both the Western Bloc and China, which makes the conflict extremely nebulous. The fear of losing out on trade and foreign aid is enough to deter most countries from choosing a side to support. This crucial difference could lead to a more drawn out and strategic battle between the two sides, one that prioritizes economic sanctions and trade wars instead of militaristic proxy wars. In addition, the organization is diverse in its members. Countries showing pro- China tendencies may lean towards a more trade-friendly solution, while countries like the US and France will likely look for a hardline approach towards China. As NATO is a consensus committee, delegates will have to navigate and mitigate possible disagreements in foreign policies and strategy. 3 https://www.cfr.org/backgrounder/chinas-massive-belt-and-road-initiative Timeline April 4, 1949 - The establishment of NATO is finalized. NATO is formed to shield countries from dominant powers and to ensure peace and security in North America and Europe.4 October 1, 1949 - The People’s Republic of China (PRC) is established and Mao Zedong finalizes his consolidation of power. The establishment of the PRC officially ends centuries of monarchial rule. The PRC’s style of governance and position against the Western bloc will ultimately lead to the development and success of modern China.5 February 1958 - The Great Leap Forward officially begins. The project—led by Mao Zedong—is an elaborate attempt to industrialize and develop China’s agrarian economy into a communist state. China plans to exploit its labour market by allocating most of China’s working class into communes. However, the Great Leap Forward is a disaster and leads to the starvation of 20 million citizens.6 October 16, 1964 - China tests its first atomic bomb titled “Project 596.” The bomb is successfully detonated at Lop Nur test site; although seemingly insignificant, the detonation is a sign that China is beginning to innovate and reconstruct its economy.7 May 16, 1966 - China outlines its plans for the Cultural Revolution—a 10 year campaign that attempts to renew the spirit of the Chinese people after the Great Leap Forward left the country in turmoil. March 2, 1969 - Amidst the Sino-Soviet split—the termination of Soviet-China relations, sparked by differences in interpreting and applying Communism and Leninism ideology—a border conflict breaks out in uninhabited islands along the designated boundary lines of the two countries. The conflict lasts until September 1969 and ends with a ceasefire agreement.8 4 Ibid. 5 https://www.britannica.com/place/China/Establishment-of-the-Peoples-Republic 6 www.britannica.com/event/Great-Leap-Forward. 7 https://www.atomicheritage.org/history/chinese-nuclear-program 8 https://www.cna.org/cna_files/pdf/d0022974.a2.pdf February 21, 1972 - Richard Nixon makes a historic visit to the PRC. In a week-long visit, Richard Nixon and his administration discuss US-China relations, strengthening diplomatic ties with each other. The visit helped jumpstart Chinese exports to the US, which fueled China’s economic transformation.9 September 13, 1982 - Deng Xiaoping—hailed by many today as the man behind China’s economic revolution—is sworn in as the Central Advisory Commissioner for the PRC. In his time as Commissioner, Deng Xiaoping issues a series of market reforms to open China to foreign trade; his efforts ultimately lead to China’s economic success as the second biggest economy in the world.10 June 3, 1989 - The Tiananmen Square Massacre—which killed hundreds of youth protesting injustice—received global condemnation and further crystallized systemic, ethical differences between NATO and China.
Recommended publications
  • Without Land, There Is No Life: Chinese State Suppression of Uyghur Environmental Activism
    Without land, there is no life: Chinese state suppression of Uyghur environmental activism Table of Contents Summary ..............................................................................................................................2 Cultural Significance of the Environment and Environmentalism ......................................5 Nuclear Testing: Suppression of Uyghur Activism ...........................................................15 Pollution and Ecological Destruction in East Turkestan ...................................................30 Lack of Participation in Decision Making: Development and Displacement ....................45 Legal Instruments...............................................................................................................61 Recommendations ..............................................................................................................66 Acknowledgements ............................................................................................................69 Endnotes .............................................................................................................................70 Cover image: Dead toghrak (populus nigra) tree in Niya. Photo courtesy of Flickr 1 Summary The intimate connection between the Uyghur people and the land of East Turkestan is celebrated in songs and poetry written and performed in the Uyghur language. Proverbs in Uyghur convey how the Uyghur culture is tied to reverence of the land and that an individual’s identity is inseparable
    [Show full text]
  • Nuclear Proliferation Policy Debate a Discussion of Nuclear Technology’S Impact on Foreign Policy
    WORCESTER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE Nuclear Proliferation Policy Debate A Discussion of Nuclear Technology’s Impact on Foreign Policy Stephen Kressaty, Justin Torres, Mathew Skerritt 3/2/2012 1 Table of Contents Overview ....................................................................................................................................................... 1 Nuclear Proliferation in Iran ........................................................................................................................ 6 Introduction .............................................................................................................................................. 7 Understanding Present Day Iran ............................................................................................................. 13 The Iranian People .................................................................................................................................. 19 Sponsored Terrorism............................................................................................................................... 25 Beyond Hezbollah ................................................................................................................................... 29 An Illicit Program ..................................................................................................................................... 34 A Possible Arms Race ............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Manhattan Project John Kenneth Christopher Hunt a Thesis in The
    The Manhattan Project John Kenneth Christopher Hunt A Thesis in The Department of English Presented in Partial Fulfllment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts in English at Concordia University Montreal, Quebec, Canada Dr. Darren Wershler, Project Supervisor April 2017 © John Kenneth Christopher Hunt 2017 1 2 ABSTRACT The Manhattan Project is a book of lyric poetry that chronicles the discovery of nuclear energy and its subsequent use as both a weapon and a fuel source. The book is grounded in the aesthetic positionality contained in scholar Joyelle McSweeney`s concept of the `necropastoral`, a liminal zone where disparate spaces, such as the classical `urban` and `pastoral`, become blurred. The Manhattan Project examines the enduring impossibility of sufciently responding to the continuing repercussions of the nuclear age and its post-nuclear contaminants through a kind of `resurrection` of lyric meditation, further mutated by both formal constraints and conceptual frameworks. 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. THE ATOMS WE CLEAVE 8 II. THE ARMS RACE Below Oklo 14 Radioactivity 18 The World Set Free 20 Ideal Isotopes 22 Critical Mass 38 Thuringia 40 III. TRINITY 44 IV. GHOSTS OF LOS ALAMOS Valles Caldera 50 Industrial Complex 54 The Demon Core 56 V. MILITARY INCIDENTS Dull Swords 66 Broken Arrows 68 Bent Spear 72 Empty Quivers 73 Faded Giants 75 Nucflash 77 4 VI. RAIN OF RUIN Clear Skies 80 Testimony 84 Operation Epsilon 88 VII. CONTAMINATION Christmas Island 92 Plutonium Valley 94 The East Ural Reserve 96 The Argonne Incident 98 The Human Factor 100 The Elephant’s Foot 102 Caveat Clepta 109 Rising Water 110 VIII.
    [Show full text]
  • Memoir of Sino-Soviet Relations) Offers an Interesting Perspective on This Era
    Theory and Practice of Chinese Foreign Policy Structural Constraints and China’s Foreign Policy Strategy Changes Rob Krawczyk ____________ ⼀分为⼆ One divides into Two12 Atom Bombs. June 1958 Let us work on atom bombs and nuclear bombs. Ten years, I think, should be quite enough.3 Atom bomb goes off when it is told. Ah what boundless joy! (Mao, Renmin Ribao, October 19 1964)4 In Two Suns in the Heavens: The Sino-Soviet Struggle for Supremacy, 1962-1967, Sergey Radchenko (2009) documents the internal "One Divides into Two" Controversy (⼀分为⼆) in Beijing in the summer of 1964. ‘Yang Xianzhen, the deputy director of the Central Party School, became the focal point of Mao’s criticism for propagating the thesis that “two combine into one” [he er er yi]. For Mao, he er er yi invalidated the inevitability of internal contradictions after unity is obtained, for if two combined into one, unity and not further struggle defined the course of societal tranformation, the dialectical machinery of the permanent revolution breaks down. In one divides into two ⼀分为⼆, more significantly, one could posture that Mao’s sense of structural realism was a nuclear realism. In Mao: An Unknown History, Chang and Halliday (2005) document the nuclear realism that drove Mao’s strategic bipolar engagement in the Korean War: ‘Mao knew that America just would not be able to compete in sacrificing men. He was ready to wager all because having Chinese troops fighting the USA was the only chance he had to claw out of Stalin what he needed to make China a world-class military power.’ Three years into the war, ’on 2 February 1953 the new US president, Eisenhower, suggested in his State of the Union address that he might use the atomic bomb on China.
    [Show full text]
  • La Tensión Nuclear En El Sur De Asia
    LA TENSIÓN NUCLEAR EN EL SUR DE ASIA LA TENSIÓN NUCLEAR EN EL SUR DE ASIA Pablo García Sánchez Artículo Grupo de Estudios de Historia Militar www.gehm.es Año 2019 LA TENSIÓN NUCLEAR EN EL SUR DE ASIA Pablo García Sánchez Índice Introducción __________________________________________________________ 3 Relaciones entre los actores ______________________________________________ 5 · China-Pakistán ___________________________________________________ 5 · India-China _____________________________________________________ 8 · Pakistán- India __________________________________________________ 16 Programas nucleares nacionales __________________________________________ 21 · India __________________________________________________________ 21 · Pakistán _______________________________________________________ 27 · China _________________________________________________________ 33 Armamento nuclear ____________________________________________________ 38 · India __________________________________________________________ 38 Capacidad aérea ___________________________________________________ 39 Capacidad naval ___________________________________________________ 40 Capacidad terrestre _________________________________________________ 42 · Pakistán _______________________________________________________ 45 Capacidad aérea ___________________________________________________ 46 Capacidad naval ___________________________________________________ 47 Capacidad terrestre _________________________________________________ 47 · China _________________________________________________________
    [Show full text]
  • No. 30 April 2021 57年出访苏联,毛主席观看3部秘密电影
    No. 30 April 2021 57年出访苏联,毛主席观看3部秘密电影,回国后安排绝密任务 On a visit to the Soviet Union in 1957 Chairman Mao was shown three “secret films,” inspiring him to launch a top-secret mission on his return Translated by Madhurendra Jha Assistant Professor, Department of Chinese Studies, Doon University, Dehradun, Uttarakhand, [email protected] Image: 1957-Mao Zedong with the CPSU leaders at Kremlin’s Red Square Source: kunlunce.com Article title in Chinese: 57年出访苏联,毛主席观看3部秘密电影,回国后安排绝密任务 Article source: : https://www.kunlunce.com/jczc/mzdsx/2021-01-19/149690.html Author: 罗敷媚Luō Fūmèi The ICS is an interdisciplinary research institution, which has a leadership role in the promotion of Chinese and East Asian Studies in India. ICS Translations aims to introduce views of the P R China scholars, analysts, and commentators coming from across disciplines. Summary Mao Zedong attaching great importance to the In November 1957, Mao Zedong was invited to invitation, decided to personally lead a visit Soviet Union; this was his second and the delegation to visit the Soviet and join the great last visit to the country. On December 16, celebration of the fortieth anniversary of the 1949, Mao Zedong led a delegation on his October Revolution. The objective of the visit maiden visit to the Soviet Union. That was the was to further consolidate friendly ties between time when the Sino-Soviet relation was in its China and the Soviet Union, and to get honeymoon phase. Mao Zedong and Joseph assistance from it in fields such as economy, Stalin held talks, both the sides signed the defence, etc. Even though some differences had “Sino-Soviet Treaty of Friendship, Alliance started showing in the mutual ties, China and and Mutual Assistance”, which turned out to the Soviet Union were still each other’s most be a huge success considering the assistance trusted partner.
    [Show full text]
  • Pr 8 Photo La 2020
    PRESS RELEASE PHOTO LA 2020 Duo show Booth B02 With the support of Centre national des arts plastiques (National Centre for Visual Arts) France. Florian RUIZ / The White Contamination / Project 596 The White Contamination series, 0,453 Bq, 2013 Pigment print on Japanese Mulberry Paper, Size: 291/8 x 62 inches ©Florian Ruiz courtesy galerie Sit Down Chantal STOMAN / Ōmecittà Ōmecittà series, My darling Clementine, 1946, Glenn Miller, 1954, 2017 Chromogenic print Size: 27 x 40 inches ©Chantal Stoman courtesy galerie Sit Down For its first participation in Photo LA, Sit Down gallery is pleased to present the work of two French photographers, Chantal Stoman and Florian Ruiz. Both of whom were interested in the same territory, Japan, but in two different time-spaces. Florian Ruiz completed his exploration outside of Japanese territory. Chantal Stoman examines the exceptional link between a small forgotten city, Ōme, and the cinema from abroad. She wishes to awaken and reveal this episode from a forgotten past, the traces of which still transpire on the city billboards. Through a mastery of color close to the Kodachrome, of very cinematic framing, it is a trip to Japan from another era towards which we are guided. She convokes reality to invoke the past, trying to give life back to Ōme. Through two series, The White Contamination and Project 596, Florian Ruiz questions and documents the relationship between human and nature through photographs attesting to the presence of radioactivity in Japanese and Chinese landscapes. In both series, the photographer wonders how invisibility can appear in a picture, here the invisibility of radioactivity, and tries to highlight its presence within these desolate landscapes.
    [Show full text]
  • Journal of Sino-American Affairs Winter 2020
    Type to enter text JOURNAL OF SINO-AMERICAN AFFAIRS 1 JOURNAL OF SINO-AMERICAN AFFAIRS 2 AN INDEPENDENT PUBLICATION VOLUME 1| ISSUE 1 |2019-20 JOURNAL OF SINO-AMERICAN AFFAIRS 3 EDITORIAL BOARD Editors-in-Chief Aaditee Kudrimoti University of California, Berkeley Nikhil Shankar Stanford University Gregory Wong University of Chicago Political Science Marcin Jerzewski National Chengchi University Anna Liu Georgetown University Jefferson Ren Rice University Zhenqi Hu Stanford University Molly McNutt Barnard College Political Culture Jacob Finke Washington University in St. Louis Noah Faison Columbia University Ethan McAndrews Indiana University Bloomington Wendy Xia Georgetown University Political Economy & Business Erika Siao University of California, Berkeley Troy Shen Stanford University Ian Wong University of California, Berkeley Marketing & Production Nancy Wenxin Hu Harvard University Andy Li University of California, Riverside JOURNAL OF SINO-AMERICAN AFFAIRS 4 LETTER FROM THE EDITORS On behalf of the Journal of Sino-American Affairs Editorial Board, we are honored to present the inaugural issue of the Journal of Sino-American Affairs. Founded as a joint venture between students at Stanford University and the University of California, Berkeley, the Journal of Sino-American Affairs is a student-led, student-run publication dedicated to providing a forum for young leaders to discuss political, economic, and cultural topics relevant to the U.S.-China relationship, and by extension global prosperity and security. Reflecting our mission of connecting emerging players in U.S.-China relations in a forum for engaged scholarship, the Journal’s editorial board is global and interdisciplinary, comprising undergraduate and graduate students from top institutions across the United States.
    [Show full text]