DOCSLIB.ORG

Quality of Life in Bristol 2012 – Transport

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

4. A moving and connected Bristol % respondents who go to work by car (as driver) % respondents who go to work by other means This indicator measures the proportion of residents who are regular car drivers, as well as regular users of other modes of transport. It is a proxy measure for traffic congestion and traffic-related air pollution. It also measures if there is behavioural change to more sustainable modes (car sharing, bus, cycle, walk) in preference to cars for regular, short journeys. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Significantly fewer residents (47%) travelled by car to work as drivers in 2012 compared to previous years (57% in 2001) and this indicates a sustainable trend to use other modes. This is also very similar to the level recorded in the 2011 Census, at 50%. Significantly fewer residents were drivers in the deprived parts of the city (42%) and the most regular car drivers lived in the peripheral wards like Stockwood and Stoke Bishop (both 65%). Not surprisingly, less than a quarter of residents in the central areas of Cabot and Clifton drove to work. The wards showing the biggest drop in drivers were Bishopston at 41% (60% in 2005) and Westbury on Trym at 56% (74% in 2005). The current high cost of fuel is likely to be influencing car use. Equalities analysis indicated there were fewer disabled people (39%) driving and a gender difference with 45% of women driving compared to 51% of men. The downward trend appeared steeper for men, with an 11 percentage point drop in drivers (from 62% to 51%) over the last eight years. Further analysis (not shown) suggests that fewer people who live in rented accommodation (33%), fewer people who say they have ‘no religion’ (44%), but more people with lower educational qualifications drove to work. Other modes of transport to work: Some related indicators have shown the same behavioural change over the same period; residents who travelled as a car passenger to work had increased from 5% to 7% and residents who travelled to work by bus increased from 10% to 13%. Walking levels (17%) and cycling levels (8%) have remained stable. These indicators were also measured in the 2011 Census and recorded similar levels for travel to work (5% car passengers, 8% cycle and 19% walk). The Census provides a national comparison and in Bristol we have a higher proportion of people walking and cycling to work, compared to similar cities in England and Wales. Equalities analysis revealed that, compared to men, women were more likely to travel to work by bus (15% vs. 10%), walk (20% vs. 13%) or as car passengers (9% vs. 4%). Women were less likely to cycle to work (6% vs. 11%). 51 Ward % Ashley Avonmouth Bedminster Bishopston Bishopsworth Brislington East Brislington West Cabot Clifton Clifton East Cotham Easton Eastville Filwood Frome Vale Hartcliffe Henbury Hengrove Henleaze Hillfields Horfield Kingsweston Knowle Lawrence Hill Lockleaze Redland Southmead Southville St George East St George West Stockwood Stoke Bishop Westbury-on-Trym Whitchurch Park Windmill Hill Question number BRISTOL Sample size Y Priority neighbourhoods Older people Disabled people BME Carer LGBT Male Female Christian Muslim No faith 100 ea 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 r Cabot Clifton Southville Lawrence Hill Ashley Bedminster 47.2 41.7 31 46.9 56 34 41 54 51 50.9 51 % respondents who go to work (as driver) by car 44.5 21 49.2 24 37 Clifton East 44.3 39 38 57 44 51 54 61 60 57 51 46 61 49 28 49 42 44 28 62 49 65 65 56 58 41 39 43 52 43 Easton 52 confidence lower Cotham limit 3969 2012 25 23.9 39.2 46.7 65.0 26.1 42.3 33.0 49.0 44.6 62.9 42.0 60.5 41.2 60.4 13.2 32.4 16.6 32.2 25.9 49.2 29.1 49.3 29.9 47.5 47.7 65.7 35.1 53.5 41.7 60.0 45.3 62.2 49.1 70.9 50.3 68.3 47.7 65.2 41.1 61.0 37.3 55.7 51.2 69.7 39.5 58.3 21.1 36.4 40.0 58.1 33.4 50.7 34.7 53.2 20.5 36.9 52.9 70.1 37.8 61.2 55.1 73.3 54.5 73.9 46.9 64.9 49.0 67.1 33.1 49.1 Bishopston 45.6 48.7 38.6 44.8 44.5 49.2 33.3 44.0 37.1 48.6 47.9 55.1 32.1 53.5 48.4 53.4 42.4 46.6 47.0 51.4 41.9 62.3 41.8 46.8 Windmill Hill confidence upper Redland limit Southmead Filwood 70 Horfield 60 50 40 30 20 10 100 0 % 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 Knowle 0 2005 Lockleaze 56.7 Source: Quality of Life survey All Bristol City Council 2012 St George West Priority 2006 Brislington West % neighbourhoods 57.7 Frome Vale 21.2 to 29.8 29.9 to 38.5 38.6 to 47.3 47.4 to 56.1 Older 56.1 to 64.8 Hillfields people 2007 56.1 Brislington East Disabled people Bishopsworth BME 2008 Hartcliffe 55.8 Avonmouth Carer Westbury on Trym 2009 55.2 Henleaze LGBT Eastville Male 2010 Whitchurch Park 54 Hengrove Female 52 Henbury 2011 Christian 49 Kingsweston St George East Muslim 2012 47.2 Stockwood No faith Stoke Bishop 4. A moving and connected Bristol % respondents who are satisfied with the bus service % respondents who are satisfied with information on bus services These indicators measure public satisfaction with the bus service that is mainly provided by First Bus working with the City Council who provide the infrastructure. Responses are also likely to reflect satisfaction with information about buses, bus frequency, cost and satisfaction with bus stops and bus lanes ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ % respondents who are satisfied with the bus service In 2012, 60% of residents were satisfied with the bus service, a significant improvement since 2005, when it was 48%. This improvement reflects major investment in the city with showcase bus routes and Greater Bristol Bus Network. Improvement over the last seven years at a ward level was most significant in Brislington West, Eastville, Hartcliffe, Henleaze, Horfield, Lawrence Hill and Lockleaze. Levels of satisfaction were highest amongst older people (67%) and people of Christian faith (65%). Further analysis (not shown) suggests that men, carers and people with higher educational qualifications were less likely to be satisfied, whilst people of Muslim faith or who live in privately rented accommodation were more likely to be satisfied. % respondents who are satisfied with information on bus services This indicator also showed significant improvement, at 55% (37% in 2006). Satisfaction was highest in Horfield and St George West and lowest in Bishopsworth and Filwood. The response by equalities groups was very similar to ‘satisfaction with the bus service’, with over 60% of older people and Christian people being satisfied with bus information. Most satisfaction was measured for the Black and minority ethnic group, at 65% and people of Muslim faith (67%). % respondents satisfied with information on local bus services 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 All Male BME Carer LGBT Older Older people Muslim Female faith No people Christian Disabled Disabled Priority 53 neighbourhoods Ward % Ashley Avonmouth Bedminster Bishopston Bishopsworth Brislington East Brislington West Cabot Clifton Clifton East Cotham Easton Eastville Filwood Frome Vale Hartcliffe Henbury Hengrove Henleaze Hillfields Horfield Kingsweston Knowle Lawrence Hill Lockleaze Redland Southmead Southville St George East St George West Stockwood Stoke Bishop Westbury-on-Trym Whitchurch Park Windmill Hill Question number BRISTOL Sample size Y Priority neighbourhoods Older people Disabled people BME Carer LGBT Male Female Christian Muslim No faith 100 ea 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 r Filwood Bishopsworth Redland Ashley Southville Cabot 59.5 56.5 49 66.5 68 63.7 65 58 48 51 58.3 69 60.1 50 64.7 60 62 Windmill Hill 51.8 54 53 67 48 60 70 65 65 66 61 74 52 61 70 65 48 54 49 57 63 64 55 64 62 51 64 56 50 70 Brislington East % respondents satisfied with the bus service confidence lower Kingsweston limit 4385 2012 16b 40.7 57.6 59.0 75.8 56.5 72.5 50.0 65.5 40.0 56.5 43.4 59.4 60.0 77.3 37.4 62.5 51.3 68.6 49.8 73.2 43.1 63.7 45.2 61.5 58.2 74.9 39.9 56.5 50.4 68.1 62.1 77.1 54.4 74.2 56.0 72.4 57.6 72.8 51.0 69.8 65.2 81.0 42.2 61.1 52.7 69.4 61.7 77.0 56.5 73.4 39.8 57.0 43.9 64.1 40.3 58.3 48.6 64.6 52.1 72.2 55.0 72.6 46.7 63.7 55.7 71.4 52.7 69.7 42.5 58.6 Easton 58.0 61.0 53.4 59.5 64.6 68.4 59.0 68.1 58.3 69.3 52.4 59.1 39.2 60.3 56.0 60.7 58.2 62.1 62.8 66.6 59.6 78.5 49.2 54.4 Cotham confidence upper Southmead limit Stoke Bishop St George East 70 Bishopston 60 50 40 30 20 10 100 0 % 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 Frome Vale 0 47.71 Clifton 2005 Source: Quality of Life survey All Bristol City Council 2012 Hillfields Priority 2006 Knowle % neighbourhoods 45.2 Whitchurch Park 48.1 to 53.2 53.3 to 58.3 58.4 to 63.5 63.6 to 68.7 Older 68.7 to 73.9 Clifton East people 2007 46.8 St George West Disabled people Westbury on Trym BME 2008 Stockwood 47.9 Hengrove Carer Bedminster 2009 56.9 Henbury LGBT Lockleaze Male 2010 Henleaze Eastville Female 54 2011 Avonmouth 58.1 Christian Brislington West Lawrence Hill Muslim 2012 59.5 Hartcliffe No faith Horfield 4.
Recommended publications
  • Station Turnout Mayoral

    Station Turnout Mayoral

    Turnout by polling station Bristol Mayoral election November 2012 Bristol All All All 323,310 90,273 27.92 Postal Postal Citywide Postal 46,265 26,758 57.84 Eligible Polling Total Ballot Station votes Polling Polling Box Voters verified station District Ward Constituency Number per box turnout BHA Bishopsworth South 1 1,205 183 15.19 BHB Bishopsworth South 2 1,604 233 14.53 BHC Bishopsworth South 3 2,163 346 16.00 BHD Bishopsworth South 4 2,438 206 8.45 BRA Bedminster South 5 1,378 288 20.90 BRB Bedminster South 6 2,049 562 27.43 BRC Bedminster South 7 2,203 685 31.09 BRD Bedminster South 8 1,669 318 19.05 BRE Bedminster South 9 1,482 356 24.02 FDA Filwood South 10 2,383 267 11.20 FDB Filwood South 11 661 125 18.91 FDC Filwood South 12 2,245 263 11.71 FDD Filwood South 13 2,184 277 12.68 HEA Hartcliffe South 14 2,507 428 17.07 HEB Hartcliffe South 15 2,465 212 8.60 HEC Hartcliffe South 16 2,340 180 7.69 HVA Hengrove South 17 2,388 338 14.15 HVB Hengrove South 18 1,837 282 15.35 HVC Hengrove South 19 1,242 159 12.80 HVD Hengrove South 20 2,149 363 16.89 KEA1 Knowle South 21 2,327 681 29.27 KEB Knowle South 22 2,061 686 33.28 KEC Knowle South 23 1,431 251 17.54 KED Knowle South 24 1,642 194 11.81 SEA Southville South 25 1,343 476 35.44 SEA Southville South 26 1,363 395 28.98 SEB Southville South 27 2,520 978 38.81 SEC Southville South 28 1,270 405 31.89 SEC Southville South 29 1,393 439 31.51 SED Southville South 30 996 174 17.47 WLA Windmill South 31 1,159 345 29.77 WLB Windmill South 32 2,090 602 28.80 WLC Windmill South 33 1,903 573 30.11
  • Schedule 1 Updated Jan 22

    Schedule 1 Updated Jan 22

    SCHEDULE 1 Sites 1 – 226 below are those where nuisance behaviour that relates to the byelaws had been reported (2013). These are the original sites proposed to be covered by the byelaws in the earlier consultation 2013. 1 Albany Green Park, Lower Cheltenham Place, Ashley, Bristol 2 Allison Avenue Amenity Area, Allison Avenue, Brislington East, Bristol 3 Argyle Place Park, Argyle Place, Clifton, Bristol 4 Arnall Drive Open Space, Arnall Drive, Henbury, Bristol 5 Arnos Court Park, Bath Road, , Bristol 6 Ashley Street Park, Conduit Place, Ashley, Bristol 7 Ashton Court Estate, Clanage Road, , Bristol 8 Ashton Vale Playing Fields, Ashton Drive, Bedminster, Bristol 9 Avonmouth Park, Avonmouth Road, Avonmouth, Bristol 10 Badocks Wood, Doncaster Road, , Bristol 11 Barnard Park, Crow Lane, Henbury, Bristol 12 Barton Hill Road A/A, Barton Hill Road, Lawrence Hill, Bristol 13 Bedminster Common Open Space, Bishopsworth, Bristol 14 Begbrook Green Park, Frenchay Park Road, Frome Val e, Bristol 15 Blaise Castle Estate, Bristol 16 Bonnington Walk Playing Fields, Bonnington Walk, , Bristol 17 Bower Ashton Playing Field, Clanage Road, Southville, Bristol 18 Bradeston Grove & Sterncourt Road, Sterncourt Road, Frome Vale, Bristol 19 Brandon Hill Park, Charlotte Street, Cabot, Bristol 20 Bridgwater Road Amenity Area, Bridgwater Road, Bishopsworth, Bristol 21 Briery Leaze Road Open Space, Briery Leaze Road, Hengrove, Bristol 22 Bristol/Bath Cycle Path (Central), Barrow Road, Bristol 23 Bristol/Bath Cycle Path (East), New Station Way, , Bristol 24 Broadwalk
  • And Still Making a Difference

    And Still Making a Difference

    Support Against Racist Incidents years And still making a difference Annual Report 2011-2012 Contentswith Current Trustees Esther Vikash ʻAs S.A.R.I. has Chairʼs Report: 3 got bigger it has got a good reputation of Directorʼs Report: 4 ʻWhen S.A.R.I. came making a difference.ʼ along my problems were Assistant Directorʼs Report: 5 over.ʼ Trustees: 6 Training: 7 Housing Association partners: 8 Richard Buba Education: 10 Ashfield YOI: 11 Discrimination: 12 21st Anniversary: 14 Vinodkumar Panna Bristol City Council: 17 South Gloucestershire Council: 18 ʻS.A.R.I. makes peoplesʼ lives North Somerset/ B&NES: 19 better.....and helps them realise that life Bristol Youth Offending Team: 20 is not that bad.ʼ Arlene Childʼs Play: 21 Consultancy: 22 ʻBefore S.A.R.I. came along people didnʼt know Avon & Somerset Constabulary: 23 what to do when racism was reported.ʼ Statistics: 24 Maya Area of Incident: 25 Finance Report: 26 Funders: 27 Irvin Kathryn Matthew Charity Number: 1047699 Company Number: 3060925 Chair’s Report Welcome to our Annual Report.This year S.A.R.I. reached a 21 year milestone. We had planned to celebrate this success but with the austerity measures that are affecting us all we decided to cancel this event. The cuts have deeply affected S.A.R.I. and our team are working creatively to maintain standards and meet targets. Examples are: • Beginning the task of changing S.A.R.I.’s charitable objectives to allow us to help all victims of Hate Crime. • Preparing for the submission of our application to be considered for the commissioning of the Hate Crime Services in Bristol.
  • 2016 Report Executive Summary

    2016 Report Executive Summary

    2016 Report Executive Summary INTRODUCTION This executive summary outlines the Happy City Pulse purpose and framework, and the headline findings from the 2016 Bristol Pilot. It aims to show how such data can inform local policy1 and cities now and in the future. Contents page Background to the project . .3–6 Happiness pulse framework . .7–8 2016 Pilot results . 9 Part 1: Overall picture of wellbeing . 10–13 Part 2: Wellbeing resilient wards . .14–18 Next steps . .19 1 We also have a range of case studies available demonstrating the role it can play for organisations Happiness Pulse: Executive Summary 2016 page 2 Why this and why now? Increasingly, economists, politicians, academics and environmentalists are recognising that we need to improve what and how we measure and define progress. Wellbeing is emerging as the front-runner as it encompassing elements of so much of our lives – including health, education, economy, environment and justice. Whilst much work is emerging at an international or national level on this, there is a significant gap when it comes to local scale change, despite the major pressures of urbanisation globally. Happy City is leading the field in providing innovative yet practical solutions to delivering real wellbeing improvement at a city-scale. 81% of Britons believe that the Government should prioritise creating the greatest happiness, not the greatest wealth. 81% of Britons believe that the Government should prioritise creating the greatest happiness, not the greatest wealth. statistic Happiness Pulse: Executive Summary 2016 page 3 A new measure of city wellbeing Policymakers and citizens in cities around the world are beginning to see the power of measuring wellbeing for public policy.
  • The Bristol Medico - Chirurgical Journal

    The Bristol Medico - Chirurgical Journal

    The Bristol Medico - Chirurgical Journal A JOURNAL OF THE MEDICAL SCIENCES FOR THE WEST OF ENGLAND AND SOUTH WALES. PUBLISHED UNDER THE AUSPICES OF THE BRISTOL MEDICO-CHIRURGICAL SOCIETY. EDITOR : J. A. NIXON, C.M.G., M.D., F.R.C.P. WITH WHOM ARE ASSOCIATED E. W. HEY GROVES, D.Sc., M.S., F.R.C.S. A. E. ILES, O.B.E., M.B., B.S., F.R.C.S. A. RENDLE SHORT, M.D., B.S., B.Sc., F.R.C.S. E. WATSON-WILLIAMS, M.C., Ch.M., F.R.C.S., Assistant Editor. EDITORIAL SECRETARY : A. L. FLEMMING, M.B., Ch.B. "Sctte est ncBclre, nfai (6 mc Sctve alius aciret." VOL. LIV. BRISTOL: J. W. ARROWSMITH LTD. London : J. W. Arrowsmith (London) Ltd. Contents of Vol. LIV Page The Evolution of a Casualty Clearing Station on the Western Front. By Richard C. Clarke, O.B.E., M.B., F.R.C.P. .. 1 ^lie Enlarged Prostate from the point of view of Practitioner and Surgeon. By C. Ferrier Walters, F.R.C.S. .. 21 J-lie Therapeutic Value of Altitude. By Bernard Hudson, M.D., M.R.C.P 35 -The Role of the Central Nervous System in Disease : Recent Experi- mental Work in the U.S.S.R. By F. Bodman, M.D. 41 ^he Carey Coombs Memorial Lecture on the Pathology and Surgical Treatment of Cardiac Ischsemia. By Laurence O'Shaughnessy, F.R.C.S 109 S?m.e Reflections on Research in Medicine. By F. J. Poynton, M.D., F.R.C.P 127 Spinal Anaesthesia.
  • 515 Bus Service Valid from January 2019

    515 Bus Service Valid from January 2019

    .travelwest.info www BD11449 DesignedandprintedonsustainablysourcedmaterialbyBristolDesign,CityCouncil–January2019 on 0117 922 2910 922 0117 on CD-ROM or plain text please contact Bristol City Council Council City Bristol contact please text plain or CD-ROM Braille, audio tape, large print, easy English, BSL video, video, BSL English, easy print, large tape, audio Braille, If you would like this information in another language, language, another in information this like would you If Hartcliffe – Imperial Park Imperial – Hartcliffe Whitchurch – Hengrove Park – Park Hengrove – Whitchurch Stockwood – Hengrove – Hengrove – Stockwood Valid from January 2019 January from Valid Bus Service Bus 515 www.travelwest.info/bus other bus services in Bristol is available at: available is Bristol in services bus other Timetable, route and fares information for service 515 and and 515 service for information fares and route Timetable, Produced by Sustainable Transport. Sustainable by Produced www.bristolcommunitytransport.org.uk w: [email protected] e: contract by Bristol Community Transport. Community Bristol by contract 0117 941 3713 941 0117 t: under operated is and Council City Bristol please contact Bristol Community Transport: Community Bristol contact please Service 515 is financially supported by by supported financially is 515 Service enquiries property lost and information fares For 0 37 A SS PA holidays. public [email protected] Y e: B N O ST except Saturday to Monday operates service The A 2910 922 0117 t: G N LO Information
  • The Impacts of Mayoral Governance in Bristol

    The Impacts of Mayoral Governance in Bristol

    The Bristol Civic Leadership Project The Impacts of Mayoral Governance in Bristol Robin Hambleton and David Sweeting September 2015 The Bristol Civic Leadership Project The Impacts of Mayoral Governance in Bristol Robin Hambleton and David Sweeting September 2015 Contents List of tables 4 List of figures 5 Executive summary 6 1 Introduction: what this report is about 8 2 Context: the debate about directly elected mayors in the UK 11 3 The Bristol Civic Leadership Project 15 4 Leadership in the community 21 5 Effective representation of the citizen 26 6 Legitimacy and accountability 31 7 Effectiveness in decision-making and implementation 34 8 Effective scrutiny of policy and performance 39 9 Responsiveness to local people 43 10 Strategic choices for urban governance in Bristol in 2025 45 Notes 50 Appendix 1: Survey research methods 51 Appendix 2: Socio-economic geography of Bristol 54 Appendix 3: Citizens’ Panel survey, 2012 and 2014, percent agree, by 56 ward socio-economic category Appendix 4: Civic Leaders’ survey, 2012 and 2014, percent agree, by 59 realm of leadership About the authors 61 Acknowledgements 62 3 List of tables 1 Bristol wards by socio-economic category 17 2 Citizens’ Panel survey, 2012 and 2014, leadership in the community, 21 percent agree 3 Civic Leaders’ survey, 2012 and 2014, leadership in the community, 23 percent agree 4 Citizens’ Panel survey, 2012 and 2014, effective representation of the 26 citizen, percent agree 5 Civic Leaders’ survey, 2012 and 2014, effective representation of the 28 citizen, percent agree,
  • Portishead Branch Line (Metrowest Phase 1)

    Portishead Branch Line (Metrowest Phase 1)

    Portishead Branch Line (MetroWest Phase 1) TR040011 Applicant: North Somerset District Council 6.25, Environmental Statement, Volume 4, Technical Appendices, Appendix 16.1: Transport Assessment (Part 6 of 18) – Appendix B, Committed Developments The Infrastructure Planning (Applications: Prescribed Forms and Procedure) Regulations 2009, Regulation 5(2)(a) Planning Act 2008 Author: CH2M Date: November 2019 PORTISHEAD BRANCH LINE DCO SCHEME (METROWEST PHASE 1) ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT Transport Assessment Appendix B List of Committed Developments Prepared for West of England Councils June 2018 1 The Square Temple Quay Bristol BS1 6DG Document History Portishead Branch Line DCO Scheme (MetroWest Phase 1) Transport Assessment Appendix B: List of Committed Developments Reference Number: 674946.CS.70.01/TA Client Name: West of England Councils This document has been issued and amended as follows: Version Date Description Created by Verified by Approved by 01 February 2016 Draft JE HS HS 02 June 2018 Final JE HS HS UA Ref Area Further Detail BCC O10_877 Former Courage Brewery Counterslip Redcliff Bristol BCC O10_1067 Former Imperial Tobacco Office Building Hengrove Way Bristol BS14 0HR BCC O10_878A Part 2 ND10 The Zone Anvil Street Bristol BS2 0LT BCC O10_565 Land Bounded By Redcliff Street, St Thomas Street And Three Queens Lane, Redcliffe Bristol BCC O10_1159 Pring & St Hill Ltd Malago Road Bristol BS3 4JH BCC O10_1206 80 Stokes Croft Bristol BS1 3QY BCC O10_1235 Ashton Vale And Former Alderman Moore Allotments Off Ashton Road (B3128) Bristol BCC O10_1243 Paintworks Bristol BS4 3EH BCC O10_1245 Sainsburys Winterstoke Road Bristol BS3 2NS BCC O10_1029 Former Post Office Sorting Depot Cattle Market Road Bristol BS1 1BX BCC O10_878E Plot ND9 Temple Quay 2 Avon Street Bristol BCC O10_541 Huller House/South Warehouse, Redcliff Backs.
  • St George West Statistical Ward Profile 2021 May 2021

    St George West Statistical Ward Profile 2021 May 2021

    St George West Statistical Ward Profile 2021 May 2021 Insight, Performance and Intelligence Service, Bristol City Council www.bristol.gov.uk/statistics - email: [email protected] CONTENTS - HELP PAGE These 2021 Ward Profiles have been compiled for Bristol City Council wards using latest data as of May 2021. This update publishes new data on quality of life, life expectancy, premature mortality, child poverty, crime and social care. Please note due to the impact of the Coronavirus (Covid-19) it has not been possible to update data for the Public Health National Child Measurement Programme and some education data. This interactive tool provides data for each of the wards and for Bristol overall, highlighting any significant differences for the relevant ward compared to the Bristol average. The tool is designed to allow users to copy pages into other reports, to provide local evidence. There is also a suite of individual Ward Profile reports. See www.bristol.gov.uk/wardprofiles . Contents Page 3 Population - ONS 2019 Page 19 Mapping Tools Page 4 Deprivation - 2019 Page 20 Sources (p1) Page 5 Quality of Life (p1) - 2020-21 Page 21 Sources (p2) Page 6 Quality of Life (p2) - 2020-21 Page 22 Ward Names Page 7 Healthy Lifestyles - 2020-21 Page 23 Ward Boundary Map Page 8 Life Expectancy - 2018-2020 Page 9 Premature Mortality - 2018-2020 Page 10 Child Poverty 2019-20 Page 11 Crime - 2020-21 Page 12 Education - 2019 & 2020 Page 13 Social Care 2021 Page 14 Housing - Census 2011 Page 15 Household Size - Census 2011 Page 16 Car Availability - Census 2011 Page 17 Ethnicity - Census 2011 Help / Notes 1/ The 34 Bristol Wards (established in 2016) are listed in blue down the left hand margin.
  • An Evaluation of Bristol Rais

    An Evaluation of Bristol Rais

    An evaluation of Bristol RAiS Layla Skinns, Natasha Du Rose and Mike Hough ICPR, King’s College London 26 February 2009 DRAFT Acknowledgements With thanks to all the staff and pupils at Bedminster, Brislington, Hartcliffe and Hengrove who participated in the research. Their perspectives were vital to the success of the evaluation. We are grateful to the staff at the local authority, in particular, Graham Knight, but also Matt Dowse and Paul Taylor, for their invaluable assistance with collating the necessary data. We would also like to thank Janet Clark the RAiS Project Manager for the advice and information she provided throughout the life of the project. Thanks too, to Sir Charles Pollard, Graham Robb and Nigel Whiskin, of Restorative Solutions, for inviting us to mount the evaluation and for their support over its course. Finally we are very grateful to the Esmée Fairbairn Foundation and the Paul Hamlyn Foundation, who funded the evaluation through Restorative Solutions. ii DRAFT Key findings Implementation • Senior Mangers in all four RAiS schools thought that restorative approaches (RAs) provided their school with a framework, more direction and gave momentum to things they were already trying to do. • There were two different approaches to implementing RAiS (i) whole-school (ii) pockets of RAs. • The quality of RAs was higher in schools using the whole-school approach in that there was greater adherence to the programme. • The ‘triad’ model (involving three staff members of different ranks and roles, regularly meeting with the Champion) was an important part of the implementation process. • Full use of support staff in the delivery of RAiS could be used to address staff concerns about not having enough time to implement the programme.
  • Neighbourhood Partnership Consultation

    Neighbourhood Partnership Consultation

    Neighbourhood Partnership Consultation DRAFT REPORT v2.0 Consultation Research and Intelligence Team April 2013 1 CONTENTS Introduction 2 Methodology 2 Analysis 2 Response 2 - 5 Main Findings 6 - 25 SUMMARY 6 - 7 Do you feel you know what’s going on in your area? 8 Do you attend local meetings about local issues? 9 If you don’t attend local meetings about local issues, what stops you? 10 Heard of Your local Neighbourhood Partnership? 11 Heard of Neighbourhood Forums? 12 Taken part in Neighbourhood Partnership / Forum 13 Taken part in other local meetings 14 What like if : Participation in ‘Neighbourhood Partnership / Forum’ or ‘Taken part in other local meetings’ combined 15 What Like if: Attend ‘Meetings on Local issues’ only 16 How could be improved if: If attend Neighbourhood Partnership / Forum or Other Local meetings 17 How could be improved if: Attend ‘Meetings on Local issues’ only 18 Aware NP make decisions on highways etc 19 Do you think it is a good idea for local people to be involved in these decisions 20 Do you think enough decisions about council services are made locally? 21 Would you like to be involved/continue to be involved in local decision-making? 22 How would you like to be involved in local decision-making? 23 What is the best time / day to have community meetings? 24 How do you find out information about your neighbourhood? 25 OPEN COMMENT ANALYSIS 'What do you think should be decided or influenced locally in the future? 26 If you attend neighbourhood partnership / neighbourhood forums/local meetings, how do you think that forums and other local meetings could be made better? 27 Equalities Profile 28 Appendix A ACORN Profile of Respondents by NP area and Overal l Appendix B Equality Analysis on selected questions 2 Neighbourhood Partnership Consultation Final Report Introduction The consultation was commissioned by the Neighbourhood Partnership Management Team and undertaken by BCC Research Consultation and Intelligence Team.
  • Verification Bristol East

    Verification Bristol East

    Verification Statement NO. OF PAPERS ISSUED NO. OF ACCORDING TO PAPERS OVER BALLOT PAPER FOUND IN OR Eligible Election of a Mayor for West of England Combined Authority Thursday 4th May 2017 ACCOUNT BOX UNDER Control Desk Supervisor/RO comments Electorate Turnout Brislington East Table 10 +/- % Station No. Poll Station C-40 St Anne's House, St Anne's Road, St Anne's Park 151 151 - 754 20.03% C-41 St Anne's House, St Anne's Road, St Anne's Park 265 265 - 1,537 17.24% C-42 St Anne's Park Children's Centre, Lichfield Road, Bristol 260 260 - 1,847 14.08% C-43 Wick Road Library, Wick Road 361 361 - 1,610 22.42% C-44 St Peter's Methodist Church Hall, Allison Road 321 321 - 1,685 19.05% C-45 St Peter's Methodist Church Hall, Allison Road 212 212 - 1,681 12.61% PV1-C-10 Postal Vote 600 600 - PV2-C-10 Postal Vote 200 200 - 2,370 2,370 - 0 Verification Statement NO. OF PAPERS ISSUED NO. OF ACCORDING TO PAPERS OVER BALLOT PAPER FOUND IN OR Eligible Election of a Mayor for West of England Combined Authority Thursday 4th May 2017 ACCOUNT BOX UNDER Control Desk Supervisor/RO comments Electorate Turnout Brislington West Table 12 +/- % Station No. Poll Station C-46 St Anne's Infants School Community Room, Bloomfield Road 357 357 - 1,733 20.60% C-47 St Cuthbert's Parish Church, Sandringham Road Entrance, Sandy Park Road 382 382 - 1,749 21.84% C-48 St Christopher's Parish Hall, Hampstead Road 414 414 - 1,403 29.51% C-49 Holymead Primary School, Rossall Road Entrance 401 401 - 1,667 24.06% C-50 Bristol School of Performing Arts, White Hart Lodge, Brislington Hill 144 144 - 851 16.92% C-51 Hungerford Community Centre, Hungerford Road 186 186 - 1,263 14.73% PV1-C-12 Postal Vote 600 600 - PV2-C-12 Postal Vote 200 200 - 2,684 2,684 - 0 Verification Statement NO.