Reference study of IFC software support: the GeoBIM benchmark 2019 — Part I Francesca Noardo1, Thomas Krijnen1, Ken Arroyo Ohori1, Filip Biljecki2,3, Claire Ellul4, Lars Harrie5, Helen Eriksson5, Lorenzo Polia6, Nebras Salheb1, Helga Tauscher7, Jordi van Liempt1, Hendrik Goerne8, Dean Hintz9, Tim Kaiser7, Cristina Leoni10, Artur Warchoł11 and Jantien Stoter1 13D Geoinformation, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands —
[email protected],
[email protected],
[email protected],
[email protected],
[email protected],
[email protected] 2Department of Architecture, National University of Singapore, Singapore — fi
[email protected] 3Department of Real Estate, National University of Singapore, Singapore 4Department of Civil, Environmental and Geomatic Engineering, University College London, London, UK —
[email protected] 5Department of Physical Geography and Ecosystem Science, Lund University, Sweden — (lars.harrie, helen.eriksson)@nateko.lu.se 6Architect —
[email protected] 7Faculty of Spatial Information, Dresden University of Applied Sciences, Dresden, Germany — (helga.tauscher, tim.kaiser)@htw-dresden.de 8GMX, Germany —
[email protected] 9Safe Software, Surrey, Canada —
[email protected] 10Department of Civil, Constructional and Environmental Engineering, Sapienza Univerisity of Rome, Rome —
[email protected] 11Institute of Technical Engineering, PWSTE Bronisław Markiewicz State University of Technology and Economics in Jarosław, Poland / ProGea 4D sp. z o.o. —
[email protected] January 8, 2021 arXiv:2007.10951v2 [cs.DB] 7 Jan 2021 This is the author’s version of the work. It is posted here only for personal use, not for redistribution and not for commercial use. The definitive version is published in the journal Transactions in GIS.