DOCSLIB.ORG

The Current State of BIM in Organisations in Russia

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Current State of BIM in Organisations in Russia The current state of BIM in organisations in Russia Ph.D., Associate Professor Iurii Stolbikhin Saint Petersburg State University of Architecture and Civil Engineering Current state in Russia .Reports based on open sources 1) Standards and regulations - I. Ivanov 2) Examples of projects realised (organisation of the process) - I. Ivanov 3) Use of BIM in design and building companies - I. Evsikov 4) Use of BIM in AEC universities – S. Fedorov, Iu. Stolbikhin 5) BIM Software and hardware – Iu. Zgoda, E.Kozlova .Questionnaires: . Use of BIM in design and building companies . Use of BIM in AEC universities .Companies Questionnaire by SPbGASU Questionnaires Answers 2017, 2019 122 answers to full 19 answers to ‘light’ Reports 2020 80% - Saint Petersburg 5% - Moscow 15% - Other regions Full questionnaire ‘Lite’ questionnaire For specialists in any For owners of large company companies 13-27 questions 7-11 questions Profile of your company (it was possible to select a number of positions) Full questionnaire ‘Lite’ questionnaire Full questionnaire: Do you use BIM-technologies in your work? Full questionnaire ‘Lite’ questionnaire Yes, but No Benefits: not in all projects Common free-accessible data Better understanding of projects 3D, 4D visualisation No Better quality of projects Expectations: Yes, in all projects Why? Why? - The company is quite effective without BIM (46%) - The company is quite effective without BIM (50%) - It is expensive to implement BIM (48%) - It is expensive to implement BIM (100%) - Lack of personnel with BIM-competences (75%) YES, Full questionnaire Number of projects made with BIM-technologies 10-30 More than 30 5-10 For how many years does your company use BIM? More than 5 1-5 3-5 <1 1-3 Type of projects / objects made with BIM: Public buildings Residential buildings Industrial buildings Comparison with Pipelines and networks дорожное строительствоRoads +2% 2017 Reconstruction and renovation 2019 Residentialиндивидуальный buildings (individual) жилой дом +11% Hospitals административныеOffices здания +25% Objects of increased danger Residential areasжилой (quarters) квартал +5% Objects of cultural heritage объекты соц.-культурногоPublic назначения buildings +7% Roads производственныеIndustrial здания и сооружения buildings +8% Railways Residentialмногоквартирный buildings (blocks жилой of flats) дом -5% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Buildings > Infra Software for working with models Autodesk Revit 86% Autodesk Navisworks 54% Autodesk Civil 3D 35% Tekla 29% Comparison with ArchiCAD 18% SketchUP 14% Autodesk Advance Steel 14% Navisworks -3% Autodesk Infraworks 13% AVEVA -3% 2017 Autodesk Robot 11% AutoCAD -2% Renga 5% 2019 Intergraph +1% Solibri 4% Advance Steel +1% Grasshoper 2% САПФИР +3% AVEVA 2% Bentley +4% Сапфир 3D 2% Allplan +2% Bentley MicroStation 2% InfraWorks +8% Bentley OpenBuildings Designer 2% Renga +11% Allplan 2% Tekla Structure +10% NanoCAD Конструкторский BIM 1,5% ARCHICAD NanoCAD Инженерный BIM 1,5% Autodesk Revit -10% BricsCAD 1,5% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% Dlubal RFEM 1,5% SCIA Engineer 1,5% Bentley SITEOPS 0% Bentley Staad.PRO 0% Software for viewing BIM models Data exchange in the company Local network E-mail Cloud systems Common Data Environment Special platforms for data exchange (Ex: BIM 360) Flash drives Do you use this in your work? IFC format Common Data Environment Second popular format after *.*DWG for exchange data Nothing from the list between different software VR and AR 1) Import / export with IFC – 50 (68%) Digital twin 2) Import / export with DWG – 54 (74%) BCF format 3) Import / export with DXF – 24 (33%) Internet of things 4) Import / export with DWF – 14 (19%) Have you used laser scanning & point cloud? No, we haven’t Used point cloud it as one of the sources of initial data Used point cloud for model improvement when going from project stage to ‘as-built’ stage Used point cloud for a constructional site modelling Used point cloud for renovation Used point cloud for quantitative control Used automatic modelling based on point cloud Please give your mark to the level of BIM-competence of AEC universities alumni They are I don’t know They have no They know Good enough, They are prepared even competences basics of BIM need some prepared better than in BIM software extra quite well, company’s stuff (one or few education ready for work programs) but badly need extra education! Universities that have been assessed: .Universities - Teaching - Research - Contractual activities Association of construction universities Teaching Student competitions BIM lessons Theses Additional BIM courses Research: Number of publications 4 categories: VAK RSCI Other VAK - Higher Attestation Commission list of science journals RSCI - Russian Science Citation Index Total number of publications: ~3000 (2016-2020) Scopus, Web of science VAK VAK - Higher Attestation Commission list of science journals RSCI Other RSCI - Russian Science Citation Index Research: conferences Contractual activities Lack of information!.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Date Created Size MB . تماس بگیر ید 09353344788
    Name Software ( Search List Ctrl+F ) Date created Size MB برای سفارش هر یک از نرم افزارها با شماره 09123125449 - 09353344788 تماس بگ ریید . \1\ Simulia Abaqus 6.6.3 2013-06-10 435.07 Files: 1 Size: 456,200,192 Bytes (435.07 MB) \2\ Simulia Abaqus 6.7 EF 2013-06-10 1451.76 Files: 1 Size: 1,522,278,400 Bytes (1451.76 MB) \3\ Simulia Abaqus 6.7.1 2013-06-10 584.92 Files: 1 Size: 613,330,944 Bytes (584.92 MB) \4\ Simulia Abaqus 6.8.1 2013-06-10 3732.38 Files: 1 Size: 3,913,689,088 Bytes (3732.38 MB) \5\ Simulia Abaqus 6.9 EF1 2017-09-28 3411.59 Files: 1 Size: 3,577,307,136 Bytes (3411.59 MB) \6\ Simulia Abaqus 6.9 2013-06-10 2462.25 Simulia Abaqus Doc 6.9 2013-06-10 1853.34 Files: 2 Size: 4,525,230,080 Bytes (4315.60 MB) \7\ Simulia Abaqus 6.9.3 DVD 1 2013-06-11 2463.45 Simulia Abaqus 6.9.3 DVD 2 2013-06-11 1852.51 Files: 2 Size: 4,525,611,008 Bytes (4315.96 MB) \8\ Simulia Abaqus 6.10.1 With Documation 2017-09-28 3310.64 Files: 1 Size: 3,471,454,208 Bytes (3310.64 MB) \9\ Simulia Abaqus 6.10.1.5 2013-06-13 2197.95 Files: 1 Size: 2,304,712,704 Bytes (2197.95 MB) \10\ Simulia Abaqus 6.11 32BIT 2013-06-18 1162.57 Files: 1 Size: 1,219,045,376 Bytes (1162.57 MB) \11\ Simulia Abaqus 6.11 For CATIA V5-6R2012 2013-06-09 759.02 Files: 1 Size: 795,893,760 Bytes (759.02 MB) \12\ Simulia Abaqus 6.11.1 PR3 32-64BIT 2013-06-10 3514.38 Files: 1 Size: 3,685,099,520 Bytes (3514.38 MB) \13\ Simulia Abaqus 6.11.3 2013-06-09 3529.41 Files: 1 Size: 3,700,856,832 Bytes (3529.41 MB) \14\ Simulia Abaqus 6.12.1 2013-06-10 3166.30 Files: 1 Size: 3,320,102,912 Bytes
    [Show full text]
  • D2.1-BIM-Models V2.Pdf
    03-2019 BIMy D2.1 v1.01 BIMy Project: D2.1 BIM Model Document metadata Date 2021-03-23 Status Draft Version 2.01 Authors Hashmat Wahid – Willemen Dieter Froyen – Willemen Lise Bibert - Willemen Stijn Goedertier – GIM Steven Smolders - GIM Stijn Van Thienen – GeoIT Elena Pajares – Assar Architects Thomas Goossens – Assar Architects Niki Cauberg – BBRI François Robberts – BBRI Jens Lathouwers – Geo-IT Erick Vasquez - LetsBuild Coordinator Franky Declercq – GeoIT Reviewed by Thomas Goossens – Assar Architects Jens Lathouwers – Geo-IT Version history Version Date Author Change 0.01 2019-04-09 SGO Introduction and scope 0.02 2019-05-03 EPA Overview of model data used 0.03 2019-05-14 SGO/SS Stability of object identifiers through time and scale 0.04 2019-06-04 HWA Modelling conventions to filter by time & IFC use 0.05 2019-06-05 SVT Scope: Parameters within Revit, Methodology: fire parameters 0.06 2019-06-06 HWA 0.07 2019-06-07 SGO Modelling time and scale: notes from the workshop 0.08 2019-06-19 SVT, TGO Modelling fire 0.09 2019-06-20 HWA Modelling time and scale 0.10 2019-09-23 HWA,LBI Document structure, modelling geometry, information, time & scale, export & filtering 0.11 2019-11-27 HWA,LBI How to model Circular Economy data 1.01 2019-12-19 TGO Reviewed – Submitted to ITEA 1 | P a g e 03-2019 BIMy D2.1 v1.01 1.02 2020-09-21 JLA Checking in native software, Path of travel functionality (Revit) 2.0 2021-03-22 All Final review 2.01 2021-03-23 JLA Reviewed – Submitted to ITEA 2 | P a g e 03-2019 BIMy D2.1 v1.01 Table of Contents Table of Contents ....................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 02 Příklady Využití a Přínosy Bim
    NWA014 STAVEBNĚ TECHNOLOGICKÉ PROJEKTOVÁNÍ INFORMAČNÍ MANAGEMENT BUDOV (BIM) 02 PŘÍKLADY VYUŽITÍ A PŘÍNOSY BIM 3. 12. 2020 + 10. 12. 2020 ING. VÁCLAV VENKRBEC OBSAH 02 Odlišné vnímání BIM Příklady využití BIM - Architektura Příklady využití BIM – Stavební část Příklady využití BIM – Statika Další využití Přínosy BIM ODLIŠNÉ VNÍMÁNÍ BIM BIM lZe růZně vnímat: - BIM jako produkt (model / dílo) - BIM jako metoda (nástroje, procesy) - BIM jako nástroj - softwarové nástroje - technologie, vybavení - BIM jako proces - zajištění interoperability - spolupráce - změna - BIM jako metodika (zavádění, dodávka projektu) ODLIŠNÉ VNÍMÁNÍ BIM BIM lZe růZně vnímat: - BIM jako produkt (model / dílo) - BIM jako metoda (nástroje, procesy) - BIM jako nástroj - softwarové nástroje - technologie, vybavení - BIM jako proces - zajištění interoperability - spolupráce - změna - BIM jako metodika (zavádění, dodávka projektu) ODLIŠNÉ VNÍMÁNÍ BIM BIM jako produkt (model) Druhy moDelování: - Objektové modelování – založeno na logické struktuře 3D moDelu, která Definuje objekty budov, konstrukcí, zařízení apoD. - Parametrické modelování – pro vytvoření moDelu využívá parametrů (např. matematických funkcí) - Procedurální modelování - využívá programovací jazyky k automatickému generování komplexních moDelů bez nutnosti velkého množství vstupních Dat - Informační modelování – je modelování komplexně propojeného systému ODLIŠNÉ VNÍMÁNÍ BIM BIM jako produkt (model) Agregované modely Distribuovaný moDel Aktivní model Pasivní moDel Není jeden správný typ moDelu ! Závisí na
    [Show full text]
  • Reference Study of IFC Software Support: the Geobim Benchmark 2019 — Part I
    Reference study of IFC software support: the GeoBIM benchmark 2019 — Part I Francesca Noardo1, Thomas Krijnen1, Ken Arroyo Ohori1, Filip Biljecki2,3, Claire Ellul4, Lars Harrie5, Helen Eriksson5, Lorenzo Polia6, Nebras Salheb1, Helga Tauscher7, Jordi van Liempt1, Hendrik Goerne8, Dean Hintz9, Tim Kaiser7, Cristina Leoni10, Artur Warchoł11 and Jantien Stoter1 13D Geoinformation, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands — [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] 2Department of Architecture, National University of Singapore, Singapore — fi[email protected] 3Department of Real Estate, National University of Singapore, Singapore 4Department of Civil, Environmental and Geomatic Engineering, University College London, London, UK — [email protected] 5Department of Physical Geography and Ecosystem Science, Lund University, Sweden — (lars.harrie, helen.eriksson)@nateko.lu.se 6Architect — [email protected] 7Faculty of Spatial Information, Dresden University of Applied Sciences, Dresden, Germany — (helga.tauscher, tim.kaiser)@htw-dresden.de 8GMX, Germany — [email protected] 9Safe Software, Surrey, Canada — [email protected] 10Department of Civil, Constructional and Environmental Engineering, Sapienza Univerisity of Rome, Rome — [email protected] 11Institute of Technical Engineering, PWSTE Bronisław Markiewicz State University of Technology and Economics in Jarosław, Poland / ProGea 4D sp. z o.o. — [email protected] January 8, 2021 arXiv:2007.10951v2 [cs.DB] 7 Jan 2021 This is the author’s version of the work. It is posted here only for personal use, not for redistribution and not for commercial use. The definitive version is published in the journal Transactions in GIS.
    [Show full text]
  • Peddisubx Inch.Pdf
    A Letter from the CEO Welcome to the World of Peddinghaus - The World of “BETTER”. In the world of Peddinghaus we aim to be better. Take a look at any of our 5,000+ installations throughout the globe. These fabricators experience reduced costs and higher production using our equipment. Why? Because with Peddinghaus they receive better technology, better service, and better quality than anyone else can provide. These things aren’t easy to do, and not every company can guarantee what Peddinghaus does. I am proud that I can say these things because at Peddinghaus we work harder than anyone to give our customers the best. Whether they are located in New York, Los Angeles, or Chicago; they all receive the very same service, spare parts, and support that is second to none. Welcome to Partnerships – From Software to Service to Sales. At Peddinghaus we maintain strong partnerships with industry leaders to ensure your success. Whether this is our relationship with leading software providers (such as Shop Data Systems, Sigmanest, Steel Office, AceCad, Tekla, FabTrol, Design Data, and more) or our partnership with regional sales and support organizations - our goal is to work together to serve you better. Welcome to the PeddiSubX-1120 – The Fastest Drill Line in the Steel Industry. At long last my dream has come true, the Peddinghaus team has designed the fastest drill line in the steel industry. The last drill line you will ever need is now at your doorstep with the all new PeddiSubX-1120. Drilling and milling processes have been re-revolutionized and fabricators’ profits have been re-energized! This drill line has the ability to simultaneously drill holes, mill copes, rat holes, flange thins and ArcWrite.
    [Show full text]
  • BIM 4 PROJECTS Jyrki Keinänen, CEO, D.Sc
    BIM 4 PROJECTS Jyrki Keinänen, CEO, D.Sc. A-Insinöörit – a skillful and reliable partner since 1959 Constant growth 45 41,2 40 36,5 33,7 35 30 28,0 2009 25,8 25 2010 20 Combining people and technology 15 2011 10 2012 5 Better built 2013 0 environment Turnover, EUR million with human Integrated service offering touch 450 436 400 400 370 350 Building 350 297 2009 Information Structural 300 Management 2010 engineering 250 provider 200 2011 150 100 2012 Construction 50 management Infrastructure 0 2013 design Personnel Wide-ranging international experience in over 50 countries Extension of Helsinki Inter- Extension of Museum ”Gösta”. The Open Innovation House at Aalto Music hall ”NyaPaviljongen” - national Airport Terminal. Awarded with International Science Institute. Modern facilitywith multi-faceted wood building offers Modelling and co-operation ArhitecturalPrize. ”Simlab” virtual workingspacefor modern spaces for cultural events were the keys to the project’s large groups. and music institutes. success. Campus Arena in Tampere, a Outokumpu F3 Steel Mill, Tornio. Helsinki Music Centre is the home for P-Hämppi – the new generation’s hub of science, research and The ferrochrome plant is the world’s the Helsinki Philharmonic Orchestra, innovative car park in a special cave technology. most integrated stainless steel the Finnish Radio Symphony environment. The best new car park production unit. Orchestra and the Sibelius Academy. in Europe 2013 with it’s 972 parking spaces. Western Metro – new 14 km Modern land reclamation: Highway E18 project comprises Road project no. 11746 long metroline with 8 bridge over a highway and supplement to the current road for comprised construction of three stations.
    [Show full text]
  • Master Thesis
    Faculty of Civil Engineering Institute of Construction Informatics MASTER THESIS Investigation and Characterization of Building Information Modeling Data (Untersuchung und Charakterisierung von Daten des Building Information Modeling) Maamoun, Mostafa Matriculation number: 4573138 Technische Universität Dresden, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Institute of Construction Informatics Supervisor: Prof. Dr.-Ing. Raimar J. Scherer External Supervisor: Univ.-Prof. Dr.-Ing. habil. Michael Kaliske Advisors: Dipl.-Medieninf. Michael Polter, Dipl.-Ing. Ngoc Trung Luu Submission: Dresden, 24.08.2018 TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents .............................................................................................................................. I Table of Abbreviations ..................................................................................................................... III Declaration of Originality ................................................................................................................. IV Acknowledgement ........................................................................................................................... V 1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Motivation .......................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Objective ..........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Get Started As a Tekla Structures Administrator
    Tekla Structures 2020 Manage Tekla Structures March 2020 ©2020 Trimble Solutions Corporation Contents 1 Get started as a Tekla Structures administrator.......................9 1.1 Information sources for administrators ....................................................... 9 2 Tekla Structures installation for administrators.................... 11 2.1 Installation requirements..............................................................................11 2.2 Installing Tekla Structures.............................................................................12 2.3 Folder structure...............................................................................................13 2.4 Tekla Structures settings in the Windows registry.....................................14 2.5 Centralized installation of Tekla Structures................................................14 2.6 Installation in a virtual environment........................................................... 15 2.7 Installing the license server...........................................................................15 2.8 Installing .tsep packages................................................................................ 15 2.9 Collaborative modeling.................................................................................. 18 2.10 Upgrading Tekla Structures........................................................................... 18 2.11 Create start-up shortcuts with customized initializations........................ 19 Create a start-up shortcut with customized
    [Show full text]
  • Structural BIM Modelling Using Tekla Structures
    Aman Oli Structural BIM Modelling Using Tekla Structures Focus on a Modelling Process of an Office building Helsinki Metropolia University of Applied Sciences Bachelor of Engineering Civil Engineering Bachelor’s Thesis April 2017 Abstract Author Aman Oli Title Structural BIM Modelling using Tekla Structures Number of Pages 34 pages + 5 appendices Date 11 April 2017 Degree Bachelor of Engineering Degree Programme Civil Engineering Specialisation option Sustainable Building Engineering Instructors Sunil Suwal, Senior Lecturer Jorma Säteri, Head of the Degree Programme The main objective of this thesis was to explore the utilization and benefits of BIM with a focus on the structural modelling process and clash detection. Structural BIM tools Tekla Structures (2016) and Solibri Model Checker v9.7 were used for developing a structural model and clash detection, respectively, of an office building. The purpose was to find various underlying benefits of BIM in generating a structural model. Systematic use of different structural tools for the BIM application which focused on modelling and documentation phases were emphasized. BIM was studied from vari- ous perspectives. To test the various tools, an office building was modelled, and an IFC (Industry Foundation Class) file made of it for Tekla Structures. For clash checking, Solibri model checker was used. A step by step guideline for modelling an office building and checking clashes was pre- sented. This thesis can be used for educational purposes and for new Tekla Structures users as a guideline. In addition, engineers working with the Solibri model checker can use this thesis as a reference document. Keywords BIM, structural modelling, Tekla Structures, Solibri Model Checker, COBIM Acknowledgements First, I would like to thank Helsinki Metropolia University of Applied Sciences for giving me an opportunity to pursue this degree program.
    [Show full text]
  • Manage Tekla Structures
    Tekla Structures 2018 Manage Tekla Structures March 2018 ©2018 Trimble Solutions Corporation Contents 1 Get started as a Tekla Structures administrator....................... 9 1.1 Information sources for administrators ....................................................... 9 2 Tekla Structures installation for administrators.....................11 2.1 Installation requirements.............................................................................. 11 2.2 Installing Tekla Structures............................................................................. 12 2.3 Centralized installation of Tekla Structures................................................ 12 2.4 Installation in a virtual environment........................................................... 13 2.5 Installing the license server...........................................................................13 2.6 Tekla Structures multi-user server............................................................... 16 2.7 Installing .tsep packages................................................................................ 18 2.8 Upgrading Tekla Structures........................................................................... 20 2.9 Folder structure...............................................................................................21 2.10 Create startup shortcuts with customized initializations......................... 21 Create a startup shortcut with customized initialization..................................................22 Available parameters in shortcuts.......................................................................................23
    [Show full text]
  • Navisworks® 2016 Supported File Formats
    Navisworks® 2016 Supported File Formats Autodesk Navisworks 2016 Solutions This document details support provided by the current release of Autodesk Navisworks 2016 solutions (including Autodesk Navisworks Simulate and Autodesk Navisworks Manage) for: CAD file formats. Laser scan formats. CAD applications. Scheduling software. NOTE: When referring to Navisworks or Autodesk Navisworks 2016 solutions in this document this does NOT include Autodesk Navisworks Freedom 2016, which only reads NWD or DWF files. Product Release Version: 2016 Document version: 2.3 March 2015 © 2014 Autodesk, Inc. All rights reserved. Except as otherwise permitted by Autodesk, Inc., this publication, or parts thereof, may not be reproduced in any form, by any method, for any purpose. Autodesk, AutoCAD, Civil 3D, DWF, DWG, DXF, Inventor, Maya, Navisworks, Revit, and 3ds Max are registered trademarks or trademarks of Autodesk, Inc., in the USA and other countries. All other brand names, product names, or trademarks belong to their respective holders. Autodesk reserves the right to alter product offerings and specifications at any time without notice, and is not responsible for typographical or graphical errors that may appear in this document. Disclaimer Certain information included in this publication is based on technical information provided by third parties. THIS PUBLICATION AND WARRANTIES, EITHER EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE REGARDING THESE MATERIALS. Autodesk
    [Show full text]
  • Economic Upturn for Building Industry
    Special Section Engineering Software Economic Upturn for Building Industry® Software Companies Address Construction Rise with Innovations, Interoperability, Better Graphics and Mobile Apps By Larry Kahaner Copyright s the economy improves and more construction projects into that market. All of a sudden, they [TEKLA users] don’t have to get underway, software developers are meeting the increas- learn a new software. They’re doing everything within Tekla Structures, ing number of projects with new products and services, since they’re basically using RISAConnection to design it.” as well as updating current offerings. Software companies As for trends, Freund notes: “Definitely, I think it’s interoperability. Aare also responding to the needs and interests of their customers: a Everybody’s talking about BIM – and has been for a while. I think need to continue to run lean and interests in interoperability, more you’re going to see more implementation of that. I think the trend over sophisticated graphics, flexibility and mobile apps. the next five years is going to be that people are going to start using it “There’s a lot more work out there,” says Amber Freund, Director more. With that, it’s going to require the software to change a bit, too.” of Marketing for RISA Technologies, LLC (www.risatech.com) in To meet its customer needs, CSi recently released the latest in their Foothill Ranch, California. “People are still workingmagazine pretty lean. ETABS product line, ETABS 2013. “It’s an innovative and revolu- Even companies that had beenS slow areT now gettingR more Uwork; they Ctionary Tintegrated U software Rpackage forE the structural analysis and haven’t really increased their staff – a lot of them – or at least not design of buildings,” says Corson.
    [Show full text]