Benefits Management and Benefits Realisation Literature Report Benefits Management & Benefits Realisation – a Literature Report

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Benefits Management and Benefits Realisation Literature Report Benefits Management & Benefits Realisation – a Literature Report Benefits Management and Benefits Realisation Literature Report Benefits Management & Benefits Realisation – A Literature Report Benefits Management & Benefits Realisation A LITERATURE REVIEW Stelios Sapountzis Kathryn Harris Mike Kagioglou Health and Care Infrastructure Research and Innovation Centre School of the Built Environment The University of Salford United Kingdom April 2008 Working Paper. Do not cite or reproduce without the permission of the authors. © 2008 Benefits Management & Benefits Realisation – A Literature Report Working Paper. Do not cite or reproduce without the permission of the authors. © 2008 Benefits Management & Benefits Realisation – A Literature Report CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION ...........................................................................................7 2 BENEFITS TERMINOLOGY .......................................................................10 3 BENEFITS CLASSIFICATION....................................................................11 3.1 BENEFITS CLASSIFICATION BY VALUE TYPE....................................................................... 11 3.2 BENEFITS CLASSIFICATION BY ORGANISATIONAL OR BUSINESS IMPACT............................... 14 3.3 UNPLANNED OR EMERGENT BENEFITS............................................................................. 16 3.4 ACTOR ORIENTATED CLASSIFICATION............................................................................... 16 4 BENEFITS MANAGEMENT AND REALISATION ......................................18 4.1 BENEFITS REALISATION AND MANAGEMENT APPROACHES & MODELS ............................... 19 5 RESPONSIBILITY FOR BENEFITS REALISATION ..................................28 5.1 ROLES ........................................................................................................................... 28 5.2 GOVERNANCE ................................................................................................................ 29 6 BENEFITS MANAGEMENT TOOLS AND TECHNIQUES..........................30 6.1 BENEFITS IDENTIFICATION ............................................................................................... 32 6.2 BENEFITS PROFILE ......................................................................................................... 32 6.3 BENEFITS REALISATION PLAN & STRATEGY ..................................................................... 33 6.4 BENEFITS DEPENDENCY NETWORK AND MAPPING............................................................ 34 6.5 BENEFITS MEASUREMENT, RANKING AND PRIORITISATION ................................................. 36 6.6 BENEFITS MONITORING & REVIEW ................................................................................... 37 6.7 EVALUATION................................................................................................................... 39 6.7.1 A Value assessment technique in Benefits realisation............................................ 39 6.7.2 `Summative' evaluation or evaluation for accountability.......................................... 40 6.7.3 ‘Formative’ evaluation or Evaluation for informing the present and learning from the past; 41 6.7.4 Post Occupancy Evaluation (POE).......................................................................... 42 7 BENEFITS MANAGEMENT AND OTHER MANAGEMENT DISCIPLINES44 7.1 PROGRAMME & PROJECT MANAGEMENT ......................................................................... 44 7.2 CHANGE MANAGEMENT .................................................................................................. 48 7.3 COMPLEXITY AND MANAGEMENT BLIND SPOTS.................................................................. 50 7.4 CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT ........................................................................................... 51 7.5 PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT & MEASUREMENT ............................................................. 52 7.5.1 Performance Management ...................................................................................... 52 7.5.2 Performance Measurement ..................................................................................... 53 7.6 STAKEHOLDER MANAGEMENT ......................................................................................... 55 7.6.1 Stakeholder Definition.............................................................................................. 55 7.6.2 Stakeholders Management...................................................................................... 57 7.6.3 Stakeholders Requirements .................................................................................... 59 8 SUMMARY ..................................................................................................61 Working Paper. Do not cite or reproduce without the permission of the authors. © 2008 3 Benefits Management & Benefits Realisation – A Literature Report 9 REFERENCES ............................................................................................65 LIST of FIGURES Figure 1 : Chain of benefits from output to objective (OGC 2007) ......................10 Figure 2 : Examples of direct and indirect benefits (CCTA, 2000) ......................13 Figure 3: Generic form of benefits (Farbey et al 1993) .......................................14 Figure 4: Active Benefits Management (Leyton, 1995) ......................................19 Figure 5: Cranfield Process Model of Benefits Management ( Ward 1996) .......20 Figure 6: Cornerstones of Benefits Realisation Approach (Thorp, 1998)............21 Figure 7: The process of ABR (Remenyi & Sherwood- Smith 1998)...................22 Figure 8: Conceptual model for BR developement (Ashurst, 2003)....................23 Figure 9: Benefits Management Process (OGC, 2007a, Bradley, 2006).............25 Figure 10: Benefits Management Framework – Gatewaytm Process (OGC 2004) .....................................................................................................26 Figure 11: Benefits Breakdown Hierarchy (Nogeste and Walker, 2005, Reiss et al., 2006) .................................................................................27 Figure 12: A typical organisational structure, showing how the various positions involved in Benefits management inter-relate (Reiss 2006) .....................................................................................................28 Figure 13: Governance Model for Benefits Management (Glynne 2006) ............30 Figure 14: Generic approach to Benefits Management (OGC, 2003) .................31 Figure 15: Critical elements of a benefits management environment (Payne, 2007) .....................................................................................................32 Figure 16 Best Practice Benefits Management Cycle (Glynne, 2007) ................34 Figure 17 Benefits Dependency Network (adapted from Ward et al 1999 by Crown 2007 & OGC 2007) ....................................................................35 Figure 18: Benefits dilution from planned benefits to realisation (Bartlett, 2006) .....................................................................................................38 Figure 19: The four AREs in value assessment (Thorp, 1998) ...........................40 Figure 20 : Choosing the right level of POE (Turpin-Brooks and Viccars, 2006) .....................................................................................................43 Figure 21 : Three main POE toolkits - The categories (Remenyi and Sherwood-Smith, 1998, Turpin-Brooks and Viccars, 2006)...................43 Figure 22: Relating benefit, change, and programme and project management (Reiss et al., 2006) ..........................................................45 Working Paper. Do not cite or reproduce without the permission of the authors. © 2008 4 Benefits Management & Benefits Realisation – A Literature Report Figure 23: High level Benefits Management Process Model- V2 (ProgM 2003) .....................................................................................................46 Figure 24: The importance of Project Mgt and Operations Mgt working together to deliver beneficial change from projects (Cooke-Davies 2002) .....................................................................................................47 Figure 25 What Benefits Management can achieve (NHS, 2007).......................50 Figure 26 the Strategic performance management development cycle (Waal, 2006)..........................................................................................53 LIST of Tables Table 1: Paradigm shift for benefits realisation (Truax, 1997)...............................8 Table 2 : Benefit Value Types (Bradley, 2006) ...................................................12 Table 3: Benefits classification by business impact using the Cranfield Grid / Boston Matrix (Bradley, 2006, OGC, 2007a)........................................15 Table 4: Taxonomy of healthcare actors (Mantzana and Themistocleous, 2004) .....................................................................................................17 Table 5: Stakeholder Types (Harris, 2008) .........................................................56 Working Paper. Do not cite or reproduce without the permission of the authors. © 2008 5 Benefits Management & Benefits Realisation – A Literature Report BENEFITS MANAGEMENT & BENEFITS REALISATION A LITERATURE REPORT Stelios Sapountzis, Kathryn Harris, Mike Kagioglou HaCIRIC, University of Salford, UK ABSTRACT During the past ten years in the UK,
Recommended publications
  • Towards Future SI Measurement Standards
    European Metrology Research Programme Towards future SI measurement standards A summary of the outputs and impact of the completed EMRP joint research projects in the SI Broader Scope theme and also projects from the Open Excellence theme. The aim of research in these themes is to develop the International System of measurement – the SI – to meet the future measurement needs of industry and society. The research is focused on the SI units for temperature, mass, electric current and time, and on technologies required by users for its implementation. EURAMET e.V. - the European Association of National Metrology Institutes Measurement matters Measurement underpins virtually every aspect of our daily lives, helping to ensure quality and safety, supporting technological innovation and keeping our economy competitive. Supported by the European Commission, EURAMET’s European Metrology Research Programme (EMRP) brings together National Measurement Institutes in 23 countries to pool scientific and financial resources to address key measurement challenges at a European level. The programme is designed to ensure that measurement science meets the future needs of industry and wider society. Research is structured around six themes – Energy, Environment, Health and Industry – as well as the measurement needs of emerging technologies and the fundamentals of the SI measurement units that form the basis of Europe’s measurement infrastructure. Contents Introduction: SI Broader Scope ............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Nexus Between Human Rights and Democracy
    E-PAPER A Companion to Democracy #1 To be Equal and Free: The Nexus Between Human Rights and Democracy THANDIWE MATTHEWS A Publication of Heinrich Böll Foundation, December 2019 Preface to the E-Paper Series “A Companion to Democracy” Democracy is a fluid, ever evolving and adaptable concept. It is influenced by historical and social context, geopolitical characteristics of a country, its neighbors, allies and adversaries, the political climate, local and global trends. The e-papers series “A Companion to Democracy” examine the phenomena and concepts closely related to democracy and democratization – those which have both a positive and a negative influence upon it. Some, like autocratization, corruption, the loss of legitimacy for democratic institutions and parties, curtailing civic participation or the uncontrolled proliferation of misleading information can rock democracy to its core. Others like human rights, active civil society engagement and accountability strengthen its foundations and develop alongside it. Our e-paper series delves into the most recent global trends and debates regarding democracy and its interactions with society, politics, rights and freedom. To be Equal and Free: The Nexus Between Human Rights and Democracy 2/ 29 To be Equal and Free: The Nexus Between Human Rights and Democracy Thandiwe Matthews 3 Contents Introduction 4 The ambiguous relationship between democracy and human rights 6 The evolution of the international human rights system: achievements and shortcomings 9 The erosion of human rights and its
    [Show full text]
  • Standards and Units: a View from the President of the Royal Society of New South Wales
    Journal & Proceedings of the Royal Society of New South Wales, vol. 150, part 2, 2017, pp. 143–151. ISSN 0035-9173/17/020143-09 Standards and units: a view from the President of the Royal Society of New South Wales D. Brynn Hibbert The Royal Society of New South Wales, UNSW Sydney, and The International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry Email: [email protected] Abstract As the Royal Society of New South Wales continues to grow in numbers and influence, the retiring president reflects on the achievements of the Society in the 21st century and describes the impending changes in the International System of Units. Scientific debates that have far reaching social effects should be the province of an Enlightenment society such as the RSNSW. Introduction solved by science alone. Our own Society t may be a long bow, but the changes in embraces “science literature philosophy and Ithe definitions of units used across the art” and we see with increasing clarity that world that have been decades in the making, our business often spans all these fields. As might have resonances in the resurgence in we shall learn the choice of units with which the fortunes of the RSNSW in the 21st cen- to measure our world is driven by science, tury. First, we have a system of units tracing philosophy, history and a large measure of back to the nineteenth century that starts social acceptability, not to mention the occa- with little traction in the world but eventu- sional forearm of a Pharaoh. ally becomes the bedrock of science, trade, Measurement health, indeed any measurement-based activ- ity.
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis of an Optical Lattice Methodology for Detection of Atomic Parity Nonconservation
    S S symmetry Article Analysis of an Optical Lattice Methodology for Detection of Atomic Parity Nonconservation 1, ,† 2,† 3,† 4,† Anders Kastberg ∗ , Bijaya Kumar Sahoo , Takatoshi Aoki , Yasuhiro Sakemi and Bhanu Pratap Das 5,† 1 Institute de Physique de Nice, Université Côte d’Azur, CNRS, 06108 Nice, France 2 Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics Division, Physical Research Laboratory, Navrangpura, Ahmedabad 380009, India; [email protected] 3 Institute of Physics, Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo 153-8902, Japan; [email protected] 4 Center for Nuclear Study, The University of Tokyo, Wako 351-0198, Japan; [email protected] 5 International Education and Research Center of Science and Department of Physics, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Tokyo 152-8550, Japan; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] † These authors contributed equally to this work. Received: 9 May 2020; Accepted: 30 May 2020; Published: 8 June 2020 Abstract: We present an extension and a deepened analysis of a suggested experimental scheme for detecting atomic parity violation, previously published in Phys. Rev. A 2019, 100, 050101. The experimental concept is described in more detail and we compute new ab initio data necessary for assessing the plausibility of the approach. Original theoretical data for transition matrix elements 2 2 on the electric dipole forbidden transition in caesium 6s S1/2–5d D3/2 are reported, as are a range of electric dipole matrix elements connected to the ground state 6s. The latter is used for an analysis of the wavelength-dependent light shift in Cs.
    [Show full text]
  • A General Introduction on Metrology and Traceability
    A general introduction on metrology and traceability Paul Brewer LNG metrology workshop 15th June 2016 National Physical Laboratory • Develop and disseminate UK’s measurement standards, ensure international acceptance • Knowledge transfer and advice between industry, government and academia • Support Industry, trade, regulation, legislation, quality of life, science and innovation industrial environment energy Gas and Particle particles Metrology The Fundamentals of Metrology • What is metrology and what is it for? • What is an NMI and what is it for? • What is the mole and what is it for? What is ‘Metrology’? . Metrology is “the science of measurement, embracing both experimental and theoretical determinations at any level of uncertainty in any field of science and technology.” . Almost all of science and industry involves making and interpreting measurement – why is metrology special? The Proclamation Regarding Weights and Measures, 1556 by Ford Madox Brown (1889) The electrochemical characteristics of platinum phthalocyanine . Quantitative conclusions inferred; but what was the accuracy, repeatability, reproducibility and uncertainty of these measurements? . Would this have affected the conclusions? Metrology’s main activities . The definition of internationally accepted units of measurement, e.g. the kilogram . The realisation of units of measurement by scientific methods . The establishment of (metrological) traceability chains by disseminating and documenting the value and accuracy of a measurement . Traceability implies the calculation of an associated measurement uncertainty . These activities may be fundamental (scientific) or applied (practical, industrial, legal) International vocabulary of metrology The Results of Metrology . Generates systems and frameworks for quantification and through these underpins consistency and assurance in all measurement . Gives a quantified level of confidence in the measurement through an uncertainty statement .
    [Show full text]
  • Dynamics of Rydberg Atom Lattices in the Presence of Noise and Dissipation
    Dynamics of Rydberg atom lattices in the presence of noise and dissipation D zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades Doctor rerum naturalium (Dr. rer. nat.) vorgelegt der Fakultät Mathematik und Naturwissenschaften der Technischen Universität Dresden von Wildan Abdussalam M.Sc. Eingereicht am 19.1.2017 Verteidigt am 07.08.2017 Eingereicht am 19.1.2017 Verteidigt am 07.08.2017 1. Gutachter: Prof. Dr. Jan Michael Rost 2. Gutachter: Prof. Dr. Walter Strunz To my family and teachers Abstract The work presented in this dissertation concerns dynamics of Rydberg atom lattices in the presence of noise and dissipation. Rydberg atoms possess a number of exaggerated properties, such as a strong van der Waals interaction. The interplay of that interaction, coherent driving and decoherence leads to intriguing non-equilibrium phenomena. Here, we study the non-equilibrium physics of driven atom lattices in the pres- ence of decoherence caused by either laser phase noise or strong decay. In the Vrst case, we compare between global and local noise and explore their eUect on the number of ex- citations and the full counting statistics. We Vnd that both types of noise give rise to a characteristic distribution of the Rydberg excitation number. The main method employed is the Langevin equation but for the sake of eXciency in certain regimes, we use a Marko- vian master equation and Monte Carlo rate equations, respectively. In the second case, we consider dissipative systems with more general power- law interactions. We determine the phase diagram in the steady state and analyse its generation dynamics using Monte Carlo rate equations.
    [Show full text]
  • Surface Realisation from Knowledge Bases Bikash Gyawali
    Surface Realisation from Knowledge Bases Bikash Gyawali To cite this version: Bikash Gyawali. Surface Realisation from Knowledge Bases. Computation and Language [cs.CL]. Universite de Lorraine, 2016. English. NNT : 2016LORR0004. tel-01754499v2 HAL Id: tel-01754499 https://hal.inria.fr/tel-01754499v2 Submitted on 18 Feb 2016 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Ecole´ doctorale IAEM Lorraine Surface Realisation from Knowledge Bases THESE` pr´esent´ee et soutenue publiquement le 20 Janvier 2016 pour l’obtention du Doctorat de l’Universit´ede Lorraine (Mention Informatique) par Bikash Gyawali Composition du jury Directrice : Claire Gardent Directrice de recherche, CNRS, LORIA, France Rapporteurs : Karin Harbush Professor, Universit¨at Koblenz-Landau, Germany Albert Gatt Senior Lecturer, University of Malta, Malta Examinateurs : Christophe Cerisara Charg´ede recherche, CNRS, LORIA, France Guy Perrier Professor Emerite, Universit´ede Lorraine, France Patrick Saint-Dizier Directeur de recherche, CNRS, IRIT, France (Pr´esident) Laboratoire Lorrain de Recherche en Informatique et ses Applications — UMR 7503 Mis en page avec la classe thloria. Acknowledgements I take this opportunity to express my sincere thanks to everyone who directly or indirectly contributed to the success of my PhD studies.
    [Show full text]
  • Publishable Summary for 18SIB07 GIQS Graphene Impedance Quantum Standard
    18SIB07 GIQS Publishable Summary for 18SIB07 GIQS Graphene impedance quantum standard Overview The aim of this project is to enable an economically efficient traceability of impedance quantities to the defining constants of the revised International System of Units (SI). This will simplify the calibration support which European and other National Metrology Institutes (NMIs) provide to the electronics industries. New and easier to operate measurement bridges, convenient and easier to use graphene quantum standards, and methods to combine them will be developed. Cryogenic system components for operating the quantum devices will be developed for the challenging requirements of impedance measurements. Need Electronic components rely, for their international competitiveness, on the application of mutually agreed measurements during their production and use. Electrical impedance (capacitance, inductance) is a quantity in this field that is practically of equal importance to voltage and resistance. It is more important than current, as the sensors, which are used in numerous contexts either rely on resistance or, more often, on contactless capacitive methods. For voltage and resistance, the “gold standards” of traceability, namely the Josephson effect (JE) and the quantum Hall effect (QHE), have been used in major NMIs for a long time. Impedance standards on the other hand still require many calibration steps with complicated measurement setups to trace them to the QHE. At present, only a very few quantum standards are in use outside of the NMIs due to the high investment, high operational costs, and complexity of use. The quantum traceability of the impedance unit, the farad, would clearly benefit if an economically viable route was established.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Full Text (Pdf)
    http://www.diva-portal.org This is the published version of a paper published in Journal of Geodesy. Citation for the original published paper (version of record): Sánchez, L., Ågren, J., Huang, J., Wang, Y M., Mäkinen, J. et al. (2021) Strategy for the realisation of the International Height Reference System (IHRS) Journal of Geodesy, 95: 33 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-021-01481-0 Access to the published version may require subscription. N.B. When citing this work, cite the original published paper. Permanent link to this version: http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:hig:diva-35326 Journal of Geodesy (2021) 95:33 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-021-01481-0 ORIGINAL ARTICLE Strategy for the realisation of the International Height Reference System (IHRS) Laura Sánchez1 · Jonas Ågren2,3,4 · Jianliang Huang5 · Yan Ming Wang6 · Jaakko Mäkinen7 · Roland Pail8 · Riccardo Barzaghi9 · Georgios S. Vergos10 · Kevin Ahlgren6 · Qing Liu1 Received: 30 May 2020 / Accepted: 17 January 2021 © The Author(s) 2021 Abstract In 2015, the International Association of Geodesy defned the International Height Reference System (IHRS) as the con- ventional gravity feld-related global height system. The IHRS is a geopotential reference system co-rotating with the Earth. Coordinates of points or objects close to or on the Earth’s surface are given by geopotential numbers C(P) referring to an 2 −2 equipotential surface defned by the conventional value W0 = 62,636,853.4 m s , and geocentric Cartesian coordinates X referring to the International Terrestrial Reference System (ITRS). Current eforts concentrate on an accurate, consistent, and well-defned realisation of the IHRS to provide an international standard for the precise determination of physical coor- dinates worldwide.
    [Show full text]
  • The Quantum Hall Effect As an Electrical Resistance Standard∗
    S´eminaire Poincar´e 2 (2004) 39 { 51 S´eminaire Poincar´e The Quantum Hall Effect as an Electrical Resistance Standard∗ B. Jeckelmann and B. Jeanneret Swiss Federal Office of Metrology and Accreditation Lindenweg 50 CH-3003 Bern-Wabern Switzerland Abstract. The quantum Hall effect (QHE) provides an invariant reference for resistance linked to natural constants. It is used worldwide to maintain and compare the unit of resistance. The reproducibility reached today is almost two orders of magnitude better than the uncertainty of the determination of the ohm in the International System of Units SI. This article is a summary of a recently published review article which focuses mainly on the aspects of the QHE relevant for its metrological application. 1 Introduction Parallel to the progress made in the physical sciences and in technology, the International System of Units SI has evolved from an artefact based system to a system mainly based on fundamental constants and atomic processes during the last century. The modern units have major advantages over their artefact counterparts: they do not depend on any external parameters like the ambient conditions and, most important, they do not drift with time. In addition they can be simultaneously realized in laboratories all over the world which strongly simplifies and improves the traceability of any measurements to the primary standards. With the discovery of the Josephson and the quantum Hall effects (QHE), two electrical quantum standards became available. As a first consequence, the worldwide consistency in the realization and maintenance of the electrical units and the electrical measurements based on them has improved hundredfold in the last decade.
    [Show full text]
  • What Is Metrication?
    What is metrication? Pat Naughtin Metrication is the process of upgrading from any of the many and various old pre-metric measurement methods to the modern metric system, which is technically known as The International System of Units (SI). Metrication began in France in the 1790s and then spread rapidly to all other nations in the world. Gradually, through the 1800s, the metric system replaced all of the numerous old historical weighing and measuring methods. By 1900, almost all nations had passed laws that accepted the metric system for use in trade, and during the late 1800s this usually translated into widespread use of the metric system by the public. The metric system is now used by all of the world's people in all nations. The philosopher, Condorcet, proved to be correct when, in 1791, he described the original metric system as: For all people; for all time. As examples, the USA has allowed metric measuring units since 1866, and the UK since 1873. Liberia and Myanmar are the only nations that have not yet passed specific metric laws but the metric system is used in both of those countries every day. Only in France, Japan, the United Kingdom, and the United States of America has there been any significant opposition to metrication, the main objections being based on history, tradition, aesthetics, economic conjecture, and a personal distaste for foreign ideas. In France and Japan the opposition faded as soon as people regularly used the metric system. This left only two nations, the UK and the USA, with citizens who have difficulty accepting the reality of worldwide metrication.
    [Show full text]
  • Realisation of the Metre by Using a Femtosecond Laser Frequency Comb: Applications in Optical Frequency Metrology
    Int. J. Metrol. Qual. Eng. 8, 16 (2017) International Journal of © B. Samoudi, published by EDP Sciences, 2017 Metrology and Quality Engineering DOI: 10.1051/ijmqe/2017008 Available online at: www.metrology-journal.org RESEARCH ARTICLE Realisation of the metre by using a femtosecond laser frequency comb: applications in optical frequency metrology Bousselham Samoudi* National School of Applied Sciences of Safi, Cadi Ayyad University, Sidi Bouzid’s Road, BP 63, Safi 46000, Morocco Received: 18 September 2016 / Accepted: 2 May 2017 Abstract. The appearance of the frequency comb technology, awarded the Nobel Prize in Physics 2005, has enormously revolutionized the metrology of optical frequencies, eliminating the need for complicated frequency chains. By direct linking to the unit of time, the second, through frequency standards (Cs, Rb), by using femtosecond mode-locked lasers and frequency comb technology, the Spanish Centre of Metrology (CEM) has established a new way of practical realisation of the National Standard of Length, the metre. By stabilising and characterising two free parameters – the repetition frequency fr and the offset frequency f0, the frequency comb generator thereby was successfully put into operation. After such realization, the accuracy of the length unit will be increased in two orders of magnitude, that is 2 Â 10À13 instead of 2.1 Â 10À11. In this paper we present the results of applying comb generator to the absolute measurement of the three Zeeman stabilized He–Ne lasers operating at 633 nm with a nominal frequency of 473.612 THz. A comparison of these results with those obtained by the current system based on standard iodine stabilized lasers is in good compatibility.
    [Show full text]