Tlatoani and Tlatocayotl in the Sahagun Manuscripts 1
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
COPYRIGHTED MATERIAL NOT for DISTRIBUTION Figure 0.3
Contents Acknowledgments ix A Brief Note on Usage xiii Introduction: History and Tlaxilacalli 3 Chapter 1: The Rise of Tlaxilacalli, ca. 1272–1454 40 Chapter 2: Acolhua Imperialisms, ca. 1420s–1583 75 Chapter 3: Community and Change in Cuauhtepoztlan Tlaxilacalli, ca. 1544–1575 97 Chapter 4: Tlaxilacalli Religions, 1537–1587 123 COPYRIGHTED MATERIAL Chapter 5: TlaxilacalliNOT FOR Ascendant, DISTRIBUTION 1562–1613 151 Chapter 6: Communities Reborn, 1581–1692 174 Conclusion: Tlaxilacalli and Barrio 203 List of Acronyms Used Frequently in This Book 208 Bibliography 209 Index 247 vii introduction History and Tlaxilacalli This is the story of how poor, everyday central Mexicans built and rebuilt autono- mous communities over the course of four centuries and two empires. It is also the story of how these self-same commoners constructed the unequal bonds of compul- sion and difference that anchored these vigorous and often beloved communities. It is a story about certain face-to-face human networks, called tlaxilacalli in both singular and plural,1 and about how such networks molded the shape of both the Aztec and Spanish rule.2 Despite this influence, however, tlaxilacalli remain ignored, subordinated as they often were to wider political configurations and most often appearing unmarked—that is, noted by proper name only—in the sources. With care, however, COPYRIGHTEDthe deeper stories of tlaxilacalli canMATERIAL be uncovered. This, in turn, lays bare a root-level history of autonomy and colonialism in central Mexico, told through the powerfulNOT and transformative FOR DISTRIBUTION tlaxilacalli. The robustness of tlaxilacalli over thelongue durée casts new and surprising light on the structures of empire in central Mexico, revealing a counterpoint of weakness and fragmentation in the canonical histories of centralizing power in the region. -
The Myths of Mexico and Peru
THE MYTHS OF MEXICO AND PERU by Lewis Spence (1913) This material has been reconstructed from various unverified sources of very poor quality and reproduction by Campbell M Gold CMG Archives http://campbellmgold.com --()-- 1 Contents Contents .................................................................................................................................................. 2 Illustrations .............................................................................................................................................. 3 Map of the Valley of Mexico ................................................................................................................ 3 Ethnographic Map of Mexico ............................................................................................................... 4 Detail of Ethnographic Map of Mexico ................................................................................................. 5 Empire of the Incas .............................................................................................................................. 6 Preface .................................................................................................................................................... 7 Chapter 1 - The Civilisation of Mexico .................................................................................................... 9 Chapter 2 - Mexican Mythology ........................................................................................................... -
Truhanería Y Sexualidad:" Techalotl" Entre Los Nahuas Prehispánicos
Agnieszka Brylak (Universidad de Varsovia) TRUHANERÍA Y SEXUALIDAD: TECHALOTL ENTRE LOS NAHUAS PREHISPÁNICOS Resumen: El objetivo del presente trabajo es realizar un estudio preliminar del dios prehispánico nahua llamado Techalotl. En la primera parte se identifi ca al avatar animal de esta deidad, que en las fuentes coloniales oscila entre ardilla, zorrillo y topo, y que al mismo tiempo comparte muchas de sus características con el tlacuache. El siguiente paso consiste en cotejar los escasos datos acerca de Techalotl provenientes de los documentos pictográfi cos y alfabéticos del centro de México para determinar el campo de acción de dicho dios. Se observa que este a nivel iconográfi co se parece a los “dioses cinco” o macuiltonaleque, lo que le vincula con el ámbito de bailes, cantos, espectáculos, burlas (de ahí su descripción como “dios de los truhanes”) y excesos. Este último aspecto se traduce, entre otros, en su relación con la sexualidad y la transgresión, que se puede percibir a partir del contexto festivo en el que aparece la fi gura del representante de esta deidad, así como en el simbolismo de ardilla entre los nahuas y, más ampliamente, en Mesoamérica, que perdura hasta el día de hoy en varias comunidades indígenas. Palabras clave: ardilla, sexualidad, espectáculo, deidad, nahuas, cosmovisión Title: Buff oonery and Sexuality: Techalotl among the Pre-Hispanic Nahuas Abstract: Th e aim of the present paper is to carry out a preliminary study of the Nahua pre- Hispanic god called Techalotl. Th e fi rst part focuses on the animal avatar of this deity, whose identifi cation in colonial sources ranges from squirrel to skunk and mole, and which, at the same time, shares many characteristics with the opossum. -
Metáforas, Metonimias Y Digrafi Smos En La Parte Central
INSTITUTO DE ESTUDIOS IBÉRICOS E IBEROAMERICANOS UNIVERSIDAD DE VARSOVIA ITINERARIOS Revista de estudios lingüísticos, literarios, históricos y antropológicos Vol. 20 Varsovia 2014 Angélica Baena Ramírez METÁFORAS, METONIMIAS Y DIGRAFISMOS EN LA PARTE CENTRAL DEL CÓDICE BORGIA !29"32# Resumen: El Códice Borgia es un libro adivinatorio o tonalamatl . La parte central de este códice es única en su tipo, ya que no tiene ningún paralelo con ningún otro códice. A través del estudio de los difrasismos o digra% smos que aparecen en las imágenes (láminas 29-32), este artículo complementará el conocimiento que se tiene de la parte central de este códice, complementando o apartándose de las interpretaciones previas. El estudio de los digra% smos ayuda a entender, además, la con% guración del lenguaje visual en el México Antiguo. Palabras clave: difrasismo, digra% smo, Códice Borgia, imágenes, religión mesoamericana Title: Metaphors, Metonymies and Digraphisms in the Central Part of Codex Borgia (29-32) Abstract: * e Codex Borgia is a divinatory book or tonalamatl. * e central part of the Codex Borgia is unique because this information only appears in this tonalamatl. In order to understand better these images, I will explain the digraphisms in Codex Borgia (pages 29-32). * is work proposes that the study of diphrasisms and digraphisms will lead us a better understanding on how the visual language worked in the Ancient Mexico. Palabras clave: diphrasisms, digraphisms, Codex Borgia , images, mesoamerican religion ITINERARIOS VOL. 20 / 2014 200 Angélica Baena Ramírez INTRODUCCIÓN Las láminas centrales del Códice Borgia 1 han sido muy enigmáticas para los investiga- dores, debido a que no existen pasajes paralelos en otros códices con contenido similar 2. -
Early Peoples Activity Sheet: the Aztecs
Early Peoples Activity Sheet: The Aztecs Pre-Columbian life in the Americas: Social organisation, city life and beliefs 1. Where did the Aztec live? The Aztec lived in an area centred on the Valley of Mexico, which is a huge, oval region surrounded by mountains and volcanoes. The valley is the site of present-day Mexico City. 2. What was the name of the city at the centre of the Aztec empire? Tenochitilan was the city at the centre of the Aztec empire. 3. What did the Aztecs believe the gods needed to keep them strong? The Aztecs believed that the gods needed fresh blood to keep them strong. Many Aztec religious ceremonies included the killing of prisoners and other victims. Often, these ceremonies took place in temples at the top of pyramids. 4. Why did Montezuma I conquer new lands? A drought caused the crops to fail. Many thousands of the Aztec starved to death in the resulting famine. Montezuma was determined that that his people should not starve again so he set out to conquer lands to the south and east, where there was plenty of rain and crops grew well. 5. Under which ruler did the Aztec empire reach its height? The Aztec empire reached its height during the reign of Ahutizotl. He made the borders of the Aztec empire stronger and seized control of land to the north and west to protect his territory from the Tarascan. He also invaded areas to the south and east. Roles of key groups in society 6. Who was the Tlatoani? The tlatoani was a male member of the royal family who was chosen from a council of noblemen to rule all the land and people inside the Aztec empire. -
Land, Water, and Government in Santiago Tlatelolco
ABSTRACT This dissertation discusses conflicts over land and water in Santiago Tlatelolco, an indigenous community located in Mexico City, in the sixteenth and early seventeenth centuries. The specific purpose of this study is to analyze the strategies that the indigenous government and indigenous people in general followed in the defense of their natural resources in order to distinguish patterns of continuity and innovation. The analysis covers several topics; first, a comparison and contrast between Mesoamerican and colonial times of the adaptation to the lacustrine environment in which Santiago Tlatelolco was located. This is followed by an examination of the conflicts that Santiago Tlatelolco had with neighboring indigenous communities and individuals who allied themselves with Spaniards. The objective of this analysis is to discern how indigenous communities in the basin of central Mexico used the Spanish legal system to create a shift in power that benefitted their communities. The next part of the dissertation focuses on the conflicts over land and water experienced by a particular group: women. This perspective provides insight into the specific life experience of the inhabitants of Santiago Tlatelolco during Mesoamerican and colonial times. It also highlights the impact that indigenous people had in the Spanish colonial organization and the response of Spanish authorities to the increasing indigenous use of the legal system. The final part discusses the evolution of indigenous government in Santiago Tlatelolco from Mesoamerican to colonial rulership. This section focuses on the role of indigenous rulers in Mexico City public works, especially the hydraulic system, in the recollection of tribute, and, above all, in the legal conflicts over land and water. -
Nahuatl Proverbs, Conundrums, and Metaphors, Collected by Sahagun
NAHUATL PROVERBS, CONUNDRUMS, AND METAPHORS, COLLECTED BY SAHAGUN Translated hy THELMA D. SULLIVAN. To give prudence to the simple, to the young knowledge and discretion; That the wise man may hear, and increase in learning, and the man of understanding may attam unto wise counsels; To understand a proverb and a figure, the words oí the wise and their dark sayings. (Old Testament, Book of Proverbs 1:4-7.) When 1 started studying Nahuatl with Dr. Garihay, a liule over two and a haH years ago, 1 hegan not merely the study of a fascinating language, hut also what has proved to he an inteHectual adventure. The translation 1 offer here of the N á huatl proverhs, conundrums, and metaphors, collected hy Sah agún, is part of the fruit of this adventure, and it is with the profoundest joy and profoundest humility that 1 dedicate it to Angel María Garihay K. in commemoration of his fifty years of distinguished scholarship. Dr. Garihay has done many things in the field of the Huma nities, not only in Náhuatl Lite rature , hut also in Greek and Latin, Hehrew and Aramaic. However, there is one thing that he has not done, and it is this one thing that has made his work outstanding. He has never taken the "human" out of the Hu manities. Dr. Garihay is not a "scholar's scholar," he is aH the world's scholar, and the knowledge that he has garnered in his lifetime he freely shares with all who are interested. He ahhors "deluxe editions" and fights against them, preferring to see his own work puhlished in less expensive editions or paper-hack so that they may he economicaHy accessihle to people. -
The Tonsured Maize God and Chicome-Xochitl As Maize Bringers and Culture Heroes: a Gulf Coast Perspective
f No. 32, 2009 WAYEB NOTES ISSN 1379-8286 THE TONSURED MAIZE GOD AND CHICOME-XOCHITL AS MAIZE BRINGERS AND CULTURE HEROES: A GULF COAST PERSPECTIVE H.E.M. Braakhuis Utrecht University “He [the Maize Hero] spoke words like water being scattered” (Alcorn et al. 2006: 601) It is now slightly more than twenty-five years ago that Taube identified the ‘Tonsured Maize God’, a youthful deity whose emergence from a turtle shell has since become an icon of Classic Maya culture. The presence of the Twin heroes of the Popol Vuh, Hunahpu and Xbalanque, at the maize deity’s emergence contributed much to this status. Taube’s conclusion that the episode represents the bringing back to life of the Twins’ father, who had died in the Underworld, has been widely accepted.1 M. D. Coe (1989: 167) was one of the first to adopt this interpretation, and it has slowly become the orthodox view. It has also become common practice to refer to the Twins’ father, Hun-Hunahpu, as ‘the Maize God’, notwithstanding the fact that a maize god is not mentioned in the Popol Vuh. Schele and Freidel (1993: 59-116, 272-286), in particular, have helped to popularize Taube’s viewpoint. They developed it into an astral maize mythology of their own, a critical evaluation of which, though much needed, lies beyond the scope of this essay. When, fourteen years after Taube’s initial study, Quenon and Le Fort (1997) presented an overview of the then available iconographic material, in which they distinguish five broad ‘episodes’, their focus remained on the interaction of the Twins with Hun-Hunahpu. -
The 52-Year Calendar of the Aztecs in the Postclassic Period 231 The
the 52-year calendar of the aztecs in the postclassic period 231 Chapter Four THE rITUAL PRACtICe oF tIMe oF THE 52-YEAR CaLeNDAR oF THE POStCLaSSIC aZTEC CIVILISATIoN It is from the Nahuatl-speaking Nahua culture called aztec, or Mexica1 as they called themselves; primary data of the ritual practice of time of the 52-year calendar are still in existence. I do not claim, however, that the Mesoamerican 52-year calendar or its associated ritual practices only ex- isted in aztec or Nahua society and culture. the term “aztec”2 derives from aztecatl,”person from aztlán”. aztlán— which can be paraphrased as “the white place” or “the place of the herons” in Nahuatl—was the designation for their place of origin. the aztecs con- stituted a part of the last Nahua faction whom invaded the Basin of Mexi- co after the decline of the toltecs (probably around 1100 AD) after leaving their place of origin (aztlán or Chicomoztoc).3 Not only their name but in addition their identity was hence transformed from chichimec4 when the aztecs founded the city tenochtitlan in 1325 AD (1 Calli according to their 52-year calendar), today known as Mexico City, on a few islands at the western part of the tetzcoco lake in the valley of Mexico. this became the capital of their transient realm in the northern and central part of Mexico from 1325 AD to 1521 AD (López austin 2001; Quiñones Keber 2002: 17). a triple alliance called excan tlatoloyan (“tribunal of three places”)—com- prising the cities tenochtitlan, tetzcoco and tlacopan—was established in 1428 AD by the regents Itzcoatl of tenochtitlan, Nezahualcóyotl of tetzco- co and totoquihuatzin of tlacopan. -
Aztec Empire JCC Background Guide
Aztec Empire JCC Background Guide April 13th Kutztown University of Pennsylvania Table of Contents 1 | Page Welcoming Letter from Chair……………………..………………………………. 3 Background ……………. ………………………………………………………………. 4-10 Topic at Hand………………………………………………………………………….. 11 What is Crisis ………………….…………………………………………….……… 12-14 Character List ………………….…………………………………………….……… 14-16 Welcoming Letter From Chair 2 | Page Staff Welcome Letter Dear Delegates, Welcome to KUMUNC XI! My name is Angel Rodriguez and I’m a junior from Reading, PA, majoring in Criminal Justice with a minor in Forensic Science. I have been part of Model UN since September 2017 and this is my first time as a chair. From 2017 until now I have been part of big conferences such as NMUN, McMUN and several others. In my spare time, I love playing basketball and recording myself playing my guitar too, later on, submit it to social media. I have a passion for Forensic Sciences and CSI fascinates me (not the TV show though). Fun facts about me, I cannot do horror movies under any circumstances, I speak two languages, English and Spanish, and a third one but partially which is Italian. The Aztecs culture is best known for the chocolate, amazing architecture, and their sometimes questionable religious ceremonies. Get ready to learn more this April… it is going to be amazing! I want everyone here to have a good time and a fun experience at KUMUNC XI. Although I am a first-time Chair, I know we will have a great time. Feel free to reach out to me with any questions that come to mind. Best of luck, Angel Rodriguez ([email protected]) 3 | Page History Early Mexica The Mexica or Aztlan migrants arrived in the basin area of central Mexico in the mid 13th century. -
The City on the Lake 1470–1518
3 The City on the Lake 1470–1518 Outside, the bright sun seared the stones of the patio; inside the thick adobe walls, all was coolness and shadow. One afternoon in 1479, Quecholcohuatl (Ke-chol- CO-wat), a young Chalcan nobleman, paused on the threshold of the Mexican tlatoani’s palace, letting his eyes adjust. “He was considering what judgment would come forth from the king,” a man from his altepetl explained many years later.1 Never had Quecholcohuatl felt such fear in his very gut, for he could tell from the looks passing between his compatriots that they thought he had been sum- moned inside to face a brutal punishment. They thought he would be escorted to one of the dreaded wooden cages the capital city was famous for; from there he would be taken to be burned to death. “Will we all be burned to death?” his friends wondered. Quecholcohuatl found it almost impossible to move forward, following the signals of the servants. But he did so. His name meant “Flamingo Snake”; it was a chosen name, in keeping with the gorgeously colored, finely embroidered clothing he wore when giving a musical performance before the king, as he had just dared to do.2 The tassels swayed as he walked. Here in Tenochtitlan, he rep- resented the greater altepetl of Chalco. He did not want these Mexica people to see his fear, only his pride. He steeled his nerves and put one foot in front of the other. *** Copyright © 2019. Oxford University Press, Incorporated. All rights reserved. All rights Press, Incorporated. -
Deities Portrayed on Censers at Mayapan
Mesoweb Publications CURRENT REPORTS CARNEGIE INSTITUTION OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ARCHAEOLOGY No. 40 July 1957 DEITIES PORTRAYED ON CENSERS AT MAYAPAN J. Eric S. Thompson DESCRIPTION OF VESSELS An excellent description of the effigy incense burners of Mayapan has been published by R. M. Adams, Jr. (1953, pp. 146-68), and supplementary information by H. D. Winters (1955, pp. 385-88). Accordingly, it is sufficient here to give an outline of their material and to refer readers to those sources. Full technical information will appear in R. E. Smith’s forthcoming study of the pottery of Mayapan. Effigy censers are made of coarse, unslipped pottery. The effigy is attached to the front of a thick-walled vase which stands on a high pedestal base, both slightly flaring. The headdress of the effigy usually rises 10 to 15 cm. above the rim of the vase. The tallest censer found at Mayapan is 68 cm. high, but the more usual height seems to have been some 10 cm. less. Some censers, although none of this class is complete, are of medium size, perhaps about 40 cm. high, and an occasional speci- men is diminutive; Ruppert and Smith (1954, fig. 7,k) illustrate one only 13 cm. high. Vase diameters are about 18 cm. There may be a lime wash on the exterior of the vessel; interiors, particularly the bases, of many are fire blackened. Small vent holes in the pedestals and in the bases of bowls are further evi- dence that burning took place in these vessels. The effigy figure is attached to the front of the vessel, in an upright position.