DOCSLIB.ORG

Nixon Articles of Impeachment

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

House Calendar No. 426 93d2d Congressmm } HOUSE 01v REPRESENTATIVES { No.Rumm-934305 IMPEACHMENT OF RICHARD M. NIXON PRESIDENT ’OF THE UNITED STATES REPORT OFT“ COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES Pm W. Romxo, JIL, Chaim \ \w _; ~ __ AUGUST 20. 1974.—Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed v.3. aovmum PRINTING OPHOI 17-171 0 WASHINGTON : 19‘“ (19) AUTHENTICATED U.s. GOVERNMENT INFORMATION GPO COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY PMEB W. RODINO, IL, New Janey, BMW” HAROLD D. DONOHUE. Mmchusettl EDWARD HUTCHINSON, Michigan JACK BROOKS, Tom ROBERT MCCLORY, Illinois ROBERT W. KASTENHEIER, Wisconsin HENRY P. SMITH III, New York DON EDWARDS, Canton}. CHARLES W. SANDMAN, 13.. New Jersey WILLIAM L. HUNGATE, Mluourl TOM BAILSBACK, Illinoi- ' JOHN CONYERS, 11., menial: CHARLES E. WIGGINS. California JOSHUA EILBllnG, Penmylmh DAVID W. DENNIS. Indium JEROME R. WALDIE, Guntomm HAMXLTON FISH, 33., New York WALTER FLOWERS, Auburn. WILEY MAYNE, Iovn ' JAMES R. MANN, South Clrolinn LAWRENCE J. HOGAN, Maryland PAUL s. BARBANES, lhrylund M. CALDWELL BUTLER, Virginia JOHN F. SEIBEBLING, Ohio ' WILLIAM S. COEIN, Milne GEORGE E. DANIELSON, Canton“: TRENT LOTT. Mississippi BOBEBTF. DBINAN, Munchupettl HAROLD V. FBOEHLICH, Wisconlin CHARLES B. RANGEL, New York CARLOS J. MOOREEAD. Cnfltornh BARBARA JORDAN, Tens JOSEPH J. MARAZITI, New Jersey RAY THORNTON, Axum: DELBERT I4. LAMA, Ohio ELIZABMH BOWMAN, New York WAYNE OWENS, Utnh EDWARD HMVINSKY, low: Inrucnunnr mourn! 81m Joan Don. Spoon! counsel Amy: E. Jung, Jr., Special Oounnl to flu; lumruy Journ A. Woons, Jr., 5m Accounts Special Counsel menu.» Cu'u, Sandor Anocfim: Spoon! Counsel Baum w. Nunnuuu, Seulor Annotate spacial 0mm"! Ron“ D. SACK, 8mm" Anode“ Special Ooumol RonIn-r A. Salmon, Annotate Special Oounul Sum". Gammon III, Deputy Minority 0mm“! I . Fun H. Amsnuun. Oatmeal ALAN MARIE, Counsel Tnonna BILL, (Joanne! Bonn! P. MURPHY, Ooumol W. PAUL anor, Gounod Juan B. F. Omrnnu', Ooumcl Ronn- L. Bnowx, counsel Rxcnum H. Pom“, Counsel chnnu. M. Conwu, Oomuel Gnom- Rnnonn, Counsel Burn! Conn“, Special Autumn ' ‘Jnna Rum, (Joann! E. Ln DALI, Gonna! ‘ Human! D. Ronnnl. counsel Joan B. DAVIDSON, counts! Snrnlx A. Sam, Gounod EVAN A. DAVIS, Oouml Jinn STAIILL, Counsel Couluxemu: J. Guru, Conant Boscon B. 81'me III, Counsel Rxcnnn H. GILL, Owns! (in! W. Sumo", Ooumt DAGIAB Huumox, 00am! Ebwum s. Ssuxnuwxcz, Counsel DAVID HANII, Special Aamtant Tnnonou Tlflmll', Oatmeal Joan E. KmuunAn, Gonna! Ronn- J. Tumon, Counsel Tun! R. Knxmmcx. Counsel J. Surnln WALK“, Counsel Joan E. Lnovrrl. Oounul Bun A. WALLIS, .12., Ooumcl annncl Luccnmo, Counsel _ WILLIAI WILD, 0mm“! R. L. Sun‘n McKln'alm, Owns! WILLIAII A. Wmu, 0mm“! Counmu: Sun Jnoun F. Zln'unc, General Counsel ' Gnnn 1. Chill, Auoelate mural Como! Dunn. L. Count, Qomncl . muxmx G. POLK, Auociate Oouuol (m (20) House Calendar No. 426 93]) CONGRESS HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES REPORT 2d Session No. 93-1305 IMPEACHMENT OF RICHARD M. NIXON, PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES AUGUST 20, 1974¥Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed Mr. RODINO, from the Committee on the Judiciary, submitted the following R E P O R T together with SUPPLEMENTAL, ADDITIONAL, SEPARATE, DISSENT- ING, MINORITY, INDIVIDUAL AND CONCURRING VIEWS The Committee on the Judiciary, to Whom was referred the consid- eration of recommendations concerning the exercise of the constitu- tional power to impeach Richard M. Nixon, President of the United States, havin considered the same, reports thereon pursuant to H. Res. 803 as f0 lows and recommends that the House exercise its con- stitutional power to impeach Richard M. Nixon, President of the United States, and that articles of impeachment be exhibited to the Senate as follows: RESOLUTION Impeaching Richard M. Nixon, President of the United States, of hi h crimes and misdemeanors. ' esobved, That Richard M. Nixon, President of the United States, A is impeached for high crimes and misdemeanors, and that the follow- ' articles of impeachment be exhibited to the Senate: rticles of im achment exhibited by the House of Representatives of the United ~tetes of America. in the nametof itself and of 3:11 of the people of the United States of America, agamst Richard M. leon, President of the United States of America, in maintenance and support of its impeachment against him for high crimes and misdemeanors. Amen: I In his conduct of the oflice of President of the United_ States, Richard M. Nixon, in violation of his constitutional oath falthfully (1) (21) 22 2 to execute the oflice of President of the United States and, to the best of his ability, preserve, rotect, and defend the Constitution of the United States, and in vio ation of his constitutional duty to take care that the laws be faithfully executed, has prevented, obstructed, and im eded the administration of justice, in that : . 8n June 17, 1972, and prior thereto, agents of the Commlttee for the Re-election of the President committed unlawful entry of the head uarters of the Democratic National Committee in Washington, Distrlct of Columbia, for the purpose of securing political intelligence. Subsequent thereto, Richard M. Nixon, using the powers of his high oflice, engaged personally and through his su ordinates and agents, 111 a course of conduct or plan designed to delay, impede, and obstruct the investigation of such unlawful entry; to cover up, conceal and protect those responsible; and to conceal the existence and scope of other uno lawful covert activities. The means used to implement this course of conduct or plan included one or more of the following: __ ( 1) makin or causmg to be made false or mlsleadmg state- ments to law ully authorized investigative officers and employees of the United States; (2) withholding relevant and material evidence or information from lawfully authorized investigative officers and employees of the United States; ‘ (3) approving, condoning, acquiescing in, and counseling wit~ messes With respect to the giving of false or misleading statements to lawfully authorized investi rative officers and employees of the United States and false or misfiading testimony in duly instituted judicial and congressional proceedings; (4) interfering or endeavoring to interfere with the conduct of investigations by the Department of Justice of the United States, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the Oflice 0f )Vatergate Spe~ cial Prosecution Force, and Congressional Committees; (5) approving, condoning, and acquieseing in, the surreptitious payment of substantial sums of money for the purpose of obtain~ in the silence 0r influencing the testimony of witnesses, potential Wltnesses or individuals who participated in such unlawful entry and other illegal activities; (6) endeavoring to misuse the (‘entral Intelligence Agency, an agency of the United States; (7) disseminating information received from ofiicers of the De— partment of Justice of the United States to subjects of iuvestiga~ tions conducted by lawfully authorized investigative officers and employees of the United States. for the purpose of aiding: and as- sisting such subjects in their attempts to avoid criminal liability; (8) making false or misleading publit- statements for the pur— pose of deceiving the people of the United States into believing that a thorough and complete investigation had been conducted With respect to allegations of misconduct on the pint of personnel of the executive branch of the United States and personnel of the Committee for the Re-election of the President and that there was no involvement of such personnel in such misconduct ; 0r ( 9) endeavoring to cause prospective defendants, and indi— viduals duly tried and cmwicted. to expect favored treatment and 23 3 consideration in return for their silence or false testimony, or rewarding individuals for their silence or false testimony. In all of this, Richard M. Nixon has acted in a manner contrary to his trust as President and subversive of constitutional government, to the great prejudice of the cause of law and justice and to the manl- fest injury of the people of the United States. Wherefore Richard M. Nixon, by such conduct, warrants impeach- ment and trial, and removal from office. ARTICLE II Using the powers of the oflice of President of the United States, Richard M. Nixon, in violation of his constitutional oath faithfully to execute the office of President of the United States and, to the best of his ability, preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States. and in disregard of his constitutional duty to take care that the lawsbo faithfully executed, has repeatedly engaged in conduct violating the constitutional rights of citizens, impairing the due and proper administration of justice and the conduct of lawful inquiries, or contravening the laws governing agencies of the execu- tive branch and the purposes of them agencies. This conduct has included one or more of the following: ( 1) He has, acting personally and through his subordinates and agents, endeavored to obtain from the Internal Revenue Service, in Violation of the constitutional rights of citizens; con- fidential information contained in income tax returns for pur- poses not authorized by law, and to cause, in violation of the constitutional rights of citizens, income tax audits or other in— come tax investigations to be initiated or conducted in a discrimi- natory manner. (2) He misused the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the Secret Service, and other executive personnel, in violation or disregard of the constitutional rights of citizens, by directing or authoriz- ing such agencies or personnel to conduct or continue electronic surveillance or other investigations for purposes unrelated to national security, the enforcement of laws, or any other lawful function of his office; he did direct, authorize, or permit the use of information obtained thereby for purposes unrelated to na- tional security, the enforcement of laws. or any other lawful function of hls oflice; and he did direct the concealment of cer- tain records made by the Federal Bureau of Investigation of electronic surveillance.
Recommended publications
  • Krogh & the Watergate Scandal

    Krogh & the Watergate Scandal

    Krogh & the Watergate Scandal Egil “Bud” Krogh was a young lawyer who worked for the Nixon administration in the late 1960s and early 1970s as deputy assistant to the president. Military analyst Daniel Ellsberg leaked the “Pentagon Papers,” which contained sensitive information regarding the United States’ progress in the Vietnam War. President Nixon himself tasked Krogh with stopping leaks of top-secret information. And Nixon’s Assistant for Domestic Affairs, John Ehrlichman, instructed Krogh to investigate and discredit Ellsberg, telling Krogh that the leak was damaging to national security. Krogh and another staffer assembled a covert team that became known as the “plumbers” (to stop leaks), which was broadly supervised by Ehrlichman. In September 1971, the plumbers’ first break-in was at the office of Ellsberg’s psychiatrist; they were looking for documents that would discredit Ellsberg based on mental health. Reflecting on the meeting in which the break-in was proposed and approved, Krogh later wrote, “I listened intently. At no time did I or anyone else there question whether the operation was necessary, legal or moral. Convinced that we were responding legitimately to a national security crisis, we focused instead on the operational details: who would do what, when and where.” The break-in, which was illegal, was also unproductive. Nothing was found to discredit Ellsberg. Importantly, the ties between this break-in and Nixon were much more direct and easy to establish than the ties between Nixon and the Watergate break-in. Krogh later pled guilty to his role in the break-in and was sentenced to two-to-six years in prison.
  • John Mccone and the Assassination of President John F. Kennedy

    John Mccone and the Assassination of President John F. Kennedy

    C061B5413 Approved for Release: 2014/09/29 C06185413 •' •' , S&GRIH'!JNOFORN Death of a President (U) DCI John McCone and the Assassination of President John F. Kennedy David Robarge (U) In recognition ofthe .50th anniversary ofthe assassination ofPresident John F. Kennedy on 22 November 1963, Studies in Intelligence reprints the below, which originally appeared as a chajJter in ChiefHistorian Da\tld Robarge:S bookJohn McCone as Director ofCentral Intelligence, 1961-1?65, published by the Center for the Study ofIntelligence in 200.5. (U) Misconceptions abound regarding CIA~ connection to the assas· sination and its role in subsequent investigations, contributing to the foct that, according to a recent polltalrm by the History Chan· (U) Walter Elder dashed nel, 71 percent ofthe American public still believes that Kennedy's in and cried'' out, 'The del:lth reniltedfrom a conspiracy. president's been shot/' ·(U) Robarge tells a very different story about Cl.A!! immediDte response to the assassination, ils interaction wilh the FBI and War­ ren Commission, the surprise appearance ofKGB defector Htri Nosenko with troubling information about Lee Harvey Oswald, and DC/ McCone's involvement with later inquiries about Kennedy's '' murder. Nothing in tlie numerous books and articles about the ass~sination that have appeared since the publication ofMcCone has materially changed any ofRobarge~ conclusions. (S) Jolut McCone and Lyman K.irk7 leaving, over hu1th, wanted to talk patrick, the Agency's Executive about the PFIAB meeting with his Director-Comptroller, met with Presi· senior deputies. They were eating in dent's Foreign Intelligence Advisory the French Room, a smaJI space next Boanl (PFIAB) through the morning .to the director•s office, when of22 November 1963.
  • Page 1 of 3 Context of '1969: ITT Negotiates with Nixon Aides To

    Page 1 of 3 Context of '1969: ITT Negotiates with Nixon Aides To

    Context of '1969: ITT Negotiates with Nixon Aides to Avoid Antitrust Lawsuit' Page 1 of 3 !Donate Home | Contact UserName Login Not registered yet? About Timelines Blog Donate Volunteer Search Go !! History Commons Alert, Exciting News Home » Context of '1969: ITT Negotiates with Nixon Aides to Avoid Antitrust Lawsuit' Printer-Friendly View Email to Friend Context of '1969: ITT Negotiates with Nixon Aides to Avoid Antitrust Increase Text Size Lawsuit' Decrease Text Size Ordering Date ascending This is a scalable context timeline. It contains events related to the event 1969: ITT Negotiates with Nixon Aides to Avoid Antitrust Lawsuit. You can narrow or Time period broaden the context of this timeline by adjusting the zoom level. The lower the scale, the more relevant the items on average will be, while the higher the scale, Email Updates the less relevant the items, on average, will be. Receive weekly email updates 1 2 3 4 5 summarizing what contributors have added to the History Commons database Email Address Here Go 1969: ITT Negotiates with Nixon Aides to Avoid Antitrust Lawsuit Donate International Telephone and Telegraph (ITT) acquires three Developing and maintaining smaller corporations, prompting the US Justice Department to this site is very labor file suits against ITT charging that the mergers violate antitrust intensive. If you find it useful, laws. Between 1969 and April 1971, ITT officials meet with please give us a hand and donate what you can. several Nixon administration officials, including Vice President Donate Now Spiro Agnew; White House aides John Ehrlichman, Charles ITT logo. [Source: Colson, and Egil Krogh; Cabinet secretaries John Connally and Private Line.com] Maurice Stans; Justice Department officials John Mitchell and Volunteer Richard Kleindienst; and others, in attempts to persuade the If you would like to help us administration to drop the lawsuits.
  • A List of the Records That Petitioners Seek Is Attached to the Petition, Filed Concurrently Herewith

    A List of the Records That Petitioners Seek Is Attached to the Petition, Filed Concurrently Herewith

    UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA IN RE PETITION OF STANLEY KUTLER, ) AMERICAN HISTORICAL ASSOCIATION, ) AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR LEGAL HISTORY, ) Miscellaneous Action No. ORGANIZATION OF AMERICAN HISTORIANS, ) and SOCIETY OF AMERICAN ARCHIVISTS. ) ) MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF PETITION FOR ORDER DIRECTING RELEASE OF TRANSCRIPT OF RICHARD M. NIXON’S GRAND JURY TESTIMONY OF JUNE 23-24, 1975, AND ASSOCIATED MATERIALS OF THE WATERGATE SPECIAL PROSECUTION FORCE Professor Stanley Kutler, the American Historical Association, the American Society for Legal History, the Organization of American Historians, and the Society of American Archivists petition this Court for an order directing the release of President Richard M. Nixon’s thirty-five-year- old grand jury testimony and associated materials of the Watergate Special Prosecution Force.1 On June 23-24, 1975, President Nixon testified before two members of a federal grand jury who had traveled from Washington, DC, to San Clemente, California. The testimony was then presented in Washington, DC, to the full grand jury that had been convened to investigate political espionage, illegal campaign contributions, and other wrongdoing falling under the umbrella term Watergate. Watergate was the defining event of Richard Nixon’s presidency. In the early 1970s, as the Vietnam War raged and the civil rights movement in the United States continued its momentum, the Watergate scandal ignited a crisis of confidence in government leadership and a constitutional crisis that tested the limits of executive power and the mettle of the democratic process. “Watergate” was 1A list of the records that petitioners seek is attached to the Petition, filed concurrently herewith.
  • Conversation Number 39-1 Portion of a Telephone Conversation Between

    Conversation Number 39-1 Portion of a Telephone Conversation Between

    Conversation Number 39-1 Portion of a telephone conversation between the President and Henry A. Kissinger. This portion was recorded on May 24, 1973 at an unknown time between 1:27 and 1:29 p.m. [This conversation is cross-referenced with conversation 440-35.] The National Archives and Records Administration prepared the following log of this conversation. Watergate -White House response -White Paper -National security Conversation Number 39-4 Portion of a telephone conversation between the President and Hugh Scott. This portion was recorded on May 24, 1973 between 1:36 and 1:38 p.m. [This conversation is cross-referenced with conversation 440-38.] The National Archives and Records Administration prepared the following log of this conversation. Watergate -Scott's actions, May 23 -Ronald L. Ziegler Scott's schedule Watergate -White House response -National security -Effect on United States foreign policy -Scott's possible statement -Scott's statement, May 23 Conversation Number 39-5 Portion of a telephone conversation between the President and Leslie C. Arends. This portion was recorded on May 24, 1973 between 1:39 and 1:40 p.m. [This conversation is cross- referenced with conversation 440-39.] The National Archives and Records Administration prepared the following log of this conversation. Watergate -Republican congressmen's morale -White House response -White Paper -National security -Effect on United States foreign policy Conversation Number 39-16 Portions of a telephone conversation between the President and Alexander M. Haig, Jr. These portions were recorded on May 25, 1973 at an unknown time between 12:58 and 1:25 a.m.
  • Eisenhower, Dwight D.: Post-Presidential Papers, 1961-69

    Eisenhower, Dwight D.: Post-Presidential Papers, 1961-69

    EISENHOWER, DWIGHT D.: POST-PRESIDENTIAL PAPERS, 1961-69 1961 PRINCIPAL FILE Series Description Dwight D. Eisenhower’s Post-Presidential Papers reveal the wide range of contacts and the busy schedule which he maintained during the 1960s. A large volume of mail kept his small secretarial staff busy, and he was in great demand as a public speaker. Correspondence in the Post-Presidential Papers offers some interesting insights into Eisenhower’s thinking on numerous issues. No longer burdened by the responsibilities of public office, he felt freer, perhaps, to express himself on various topics. Among the issues discussed in documents found within the 1961 Principal File are the space program, the Berlin situation, Republican party politics, the U.S. economy and monetary policy, and the 1960 elections. Additional topics discussed include Cuba and the Bay of Pigs disaster, foreign aid, taxes, the alleged missile gap, the 1952 campaign, the U.S.I.A.’s mission, the Electoral College, Laos, Latin America, and public housing. Eisenhower’s correspondence in the 1961 Principal File reflects a virtual Who’s Who of both foreign leaders and prominent Americans. Konrad Adenauer of Germany, John Diefenbaker of Canada, Anthony Eden, Harold Macmillan, and Queen Elizabeth of Great Britain, Prime Minister Menzies of Australia, President Mateos of Mexico, and King Saud of Saudi Arabia are among the foreign leaders who stayed in touch with the ex-president. Many prominent Americans maintained contact with the former president as well. He corresponded with numerous former members of his administration, including Dillon Anderson, Ezra Taft Benson, Arthur F. Burns, Andrew Goodpaster, James Hagerty, Bryce Harlow, Gabriel Hauge, C.D.
  • John Mitchell and the Crimes of Watergate Reconsidered Gerald Caplan Pacific Cgem Orge School of Law

    John Mitchell and the Crimes of Watergate Reconsidered Gerald Caplan Pacific Cgem Orge School of Law

    University of the Pacific Scholarly Commons McGeorge School of Law Scholarly Articles McGeorge School of Law Faculty Scholarship 2010 The akM ing of the Attorney General: John Mitchell and the Crimes of Watergate Reconsidered Gerald Caplan Pacific cGeM orge School of Law Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.pacific.edu/facultyarticles Part of the Legal Biography Commons, and the President/Executive Department Commons Recommended Citation 41 McGeorge L. Rev. 311 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the McGeorge School of Law Faculty Scholarship at Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in McGeorge School of Law Scholarly Articles by an authorized administrator of Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Book Review Essay The Making of the Attorney General: John Mitchell and the Crimes of Watergate Reconsidered Gerald Caplan* I. INTRODUCTION Shortly after I resigned my position as General Counsel of the District of Columbia Metropolitan Police Department in 1971, I was startled to receive a two-page letter from Attorney General John Mitchell. I was not a Department of Justice employee, and Mitchell's acquaintance with me was largely second-hand. The contents were surprising. Mitchell generously lauded my rather modest role "in developing an effective and professional law enforcement program for the District of Columbia." Beyond this, he added, "Your thoughtful suggestions have been of considerable help to me and my colleagues at the Department of Justice." The salutation was, "Dear Jerry," and the signature, "John." I was elated. I framed the letter and hung it in my office.
  • To Set the Record Straight by Judge John J. Sirica Richard L

    To Set the Record Straight by Judge John J. Sirica Richard L

    The University of Akron IdeaExchange@UAkron Akron Law Review Akron Law Journals July 2015 Book Review: To Set The Record Straight By Judge John J. Sirica Richard L. Aynes Please take a moment to share how this work helps you through this survey. Your feedback will be important as we plan further development of our repository. Follow this and additional works at: https://ideaexchange.uakron.edu/akronlawreview Part of the Legal Biography Commons, and the Legal Profession Commons Recommended Citation Aynes, Richard L. (1981) "Book Review: To Set The Record Straight By Judge John J. Sirica," Akron Law Review: Vol. 14 : Iss. 2 , Article 6. Available at: https://ideaexchange.uakron.edu/akronlawreview/vol14/iss2/6 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Akron Law Journals at IdeaExchange@UAkron, the institutional repository of The nivU ersity of Akron in Akron, Ohio, USA. It has been accepted for inclusion in Akron Law Review by an authorized administrator of IdeaExchange@UAkron. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. Aynes: Book Review BOOK REVIEW To SET THE RECORD STRAIGHT: By Judge John J. Sirica W. W. Norton & Co., 1979. 303 pp. Reviewed by Richard L. Aynes* N MANY WAYS it seems almost impossible that eight years have passed since that night on June 17, 1972 when the Democratic National Head- quarters at the Watergate complex was burglarized. Yet, the fact that so much time has passed becomes evident when one recognizes that many of the principal characters, once prominent in the headlines, have now faded into obscurity.
  • Robert Mardian (Bress)

    Robert Mardian (Bress)

    REPRODUCED AT THE I~ATIONAL ARCHIVES ¯ 2466 MR. BRESS : l.iay~ it please ti~e Cou~’to, counsel, ladies and gentl~:aen.of the jury. ~ly n~me is David Bress. I am app.-e~a~ing before you on behalf of defendapt Robert C. Mardian. As you understand fron~ ~qhat the C~t has already stated, the defendants do not ]]ave to make ~m opening state,_-:~ent they have the right to reserve. So~,~e have reserved, and some have: ~hos.en to make an opening statement. I have chosen to make one to you -~/: this ti:.::e for t%,;o re.aSOl~S . First, Robert i.iardian is very mi=fmal!l~ involved in the evidence in this case i.~; a very perfLrlieral ~.:ay and it would be a long time before %:e are able to l~u~ on our evidence on our case. It may be t~o or three months from, aow before he / has the oppontunity to offer evidence in hi~ o%-;n behalf. Therefore, it would make your- function a lot easier if you kne~; ~;ho ~e ~.:e~.-u si~ting at the table and ~hat are we doing her~-~ ~’.nd \.~hat U~ -,-.~,s,-, do ~,;e have, so that you can ~ore I REPRODUCED AT THE NAT;ONAL ARCHIVES ¯ 2467 twelve-count indictn, ent against five defendants. Robert [.:ardian is mentioned only in the first count. He is ti~e¯ only defendant before you who is ntentlo;.e~" ~ ~ only in the first count. I kno%, m~%y of you have not had previous experience as jurors and ~’un~s ’ must be some~.~hat of a novel experience for you, unique, but the Govez’~ent files an indic~r~ent, a charge, ~,hich is not evidence and it stahes t-~hat it expects to prove in support of the charge, what the charge is.
  • Watergate, Multiple Conspiracies, and the White House Tapes

    Watergate, Multiple Conspiracies, and the White House Tapes

    Do Not Delete 8/1/2012 8:26 PM Watergate, Multiple Conspiracies, and the White House Tapes Arnold Rochvarg* On January 1, 1975, John Mitchell, former United States Attorney General, John Ehrlichman, former Chief White House Assistant for Domestic Affairs, H.R. Haldeman, former White House Chief of Staff, and Robert Mardian, former Assistant Attorney General, were convicted of conspiracy1 for their involvement in what is generally known as “Watergate.”2 The Watergate conspiracy trial, presided over by Judge John Sirica, had run from October 1, 1974 until December 27, 1974.3 The trial included the in-court testimony of most of the figures involved in the Watergate scandal,4 and the playing of thirty of the “White House tapes.”5 The purpose of this Symposium article is to discuss whether the evidence presented at the Watergate trial is better understood as evidence of multiple conspiracies, as argued by two of the defendants,6 or as a single conspiracy as argued by the prosecution. The article first will set forth the law on multiple conspiracies and apply that law to the evidence presented at the Watergate conspiracy trial. The article will then discuss whether the admission into evidence of certain White House tapes premised on the single conspiracy view may have prejudiced any of the convicted defendants. I. THE LAW OF MULTIPLE CONSPIRACIES It is not uncommon at a criminal conspiracy trial, or on appeal from a conviction of conspiracy, for a defendant to argue that a guilty verdict for * Professor, University of Baltimore School of Law. Professor Rochvarg was a member of the legal defense team that represented Robert Mardian in the appeal of his conviction of conspiracy at the Watergate conspiracy trial.
  • Character/Person Role/Job the PRESIDENT and ALL of HIS MEN

    Character/Person Role/Job the PRESIDENT and ALL of HIS MEN

    Actor Character/Person Role/Job THE PRESIDENT AND ALL OF HIS MEN Richard Nixon 37th US President 39th VP under Nixon until 1973; resigned amid charges of extortion, tax fraud, bribery & Spiro Agnew conspiracy (replaced by Gerald Ford, who was the House Minority Leader) VP replacing Agnew, later became 38th US Gerald Ford President Special counsel to Nixon; set up the Charles Colson "plumbers" unit to investigate info leaks from White House Nixon's domestic policy adviser; directed the John Ehrlichman "plumbers" unit H.R. “Bob” Haldeman Nixon’s chief of staff Haldeman's right-hand man; was the deputy Jeb Stuart Magruder director of Nixon's re-election campaign when the break-in occurred at his urging Nixon’s 1972 midwest campaign manager; Kenneth Dahlberg his check for $25k to Maurice Stans wound up in bank acct of a Watergate burglar Attorney General; then quit AG to be John Randolph John Mitchell chairman of CREEP; linked to a slush fund that funded the burglary Replaced Mitchell as chairman of CREEP Clark MacGregor (July to Nov 1972) Became Attorney General in 1972 (5 days before Watergate break-in) when Mitchell Richard Kleindienst resigned as AG to go work for CREEP; resigned in 1973 Former CIA agent and mastermind of the break-in; Member of the White House E. Howard Hunt "plumbers"; his phone # was found on a WG burglar, linking break-in to WH Former FBI agent who helped plan the break- G. Gordon Liddy in at DNC offices; spent over 4 years in prison; now an actor, author & talk-show host Commerce secretary & later the finance chairman for CREEP; raised nearly $60 Maurice Stans million for Nixon's re-election; insisted that he had no knowledge how some of the money he raised wound up in the cover-up.
  • The Inventory of the Edward Jay Epstein Collection #818

    The Inventory of the Edward Jay Epstein Collection #818

    The Inventory of the Edward Jay Epstein Collection #818 Howard Gotlieb Archival Research Center ... , EPSTEIN, EDWARD JAY (1935- ) Deposit May 1979 The Edward Jay Epstein Collection consists primarily of research material for three of Mr. Epstein's more prominent works: LEGEND: THE SECRET WORLD OF LEE HARVEY OSWALD, a study of the activ­ ities of the assassin of President John F. Kennedy prior to the assas­ sination; AGENCY OF FEAR: OPIATES AND POLITICAL POWER IN AMERICA, an investigation of the Nixon Admi.nistration's war on drugs in the early 197Os; and NEWS FROM NOWHERE: TELEVISION AND THE NEWS, a report on electronic journalism and the television industry•. The·~_Epstein Col­ lection also contains galleys and some notes pertaining to BETWEEN FACT AND FICTION: THE PROBLEM OF JOURNALISM as well as drafts of some of Mr. Epstein's articles and reviews. In addition, there are small amounts of personal material including correspondence and syllabi and student papers from college courses taught by Mr. Epstein and bits and pieces of various research projects. The extensive research material for LEGEND includes FBI, CIA, Secret Service and State Department files on Lee Harvey Oswald and Marina.·. Oswald, reports and interviews with Marines who served with Oswald and other persons who knew him and had contact with him prior to the Kennedy assassination. The AGENCY OF FEAR material contains a lengthy transcript of an interview with Egil Krogh, Deputy Assistant to the President for Domestic Affairs in the Nixon White House, and the White House files of Krogh and Jeffrey Donfeld, Staff Assistant to President Nixon, per­ taining to the Administration's war on drugs.