DOCSLIB.ORG

Conversation Number 39-1 Portion of a Telephone Conversation Between

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Conversation Number 39-1 Portion of a Telephone Conversation Between Conversation Number 39-1 Portion of a telephone conversation between the President and Henry A. Kissinger. This portion was recorded on May 24, 1973 at an unknown time between 1:27 and 1:29 p.m. [This conversation is cross-referenced with conversation 440-35.] The National Archives and Records Administration prepared the following log of this conversation. Watergate -White House response -White Paper -National security Conversation Number 39-4 Portion of a telephone conversation between the President and Hugh Scott. This portion was recorded on May 24, 1973 between 1:36 and 1:38 p.m. [This conversation is cross-referenced with conversation 440-38.] The National Archives and Records Administration prepared the following log of this conversation. Watergate -Scott's actions, May 23 -Ronald L. Ziegler Scott's schedule Watergate -White House response -National security -Effect on United States foreign policy -Scott's possible statement -Scott's statement, May 23 Conversation Number 39-5 Portion of a telephone conversation between the President and Leslie C. Arends. This portion was recorded on May 24, 1973 between 1:39 and 1:40 p.m. [This conversation is cross- referenced with conversation 440-39.] The National Archives and Records Administration prepared the following log of this conversation. Watergate -Republican congressmen's morale -White House response -White Paper -National security -Effect on United States foreign policy Conversation Number 39-16 Portions of a telephone conversation between the President and Alexander M. Haig, Jr. These portions were recorded on May 25, 1973 at an unknown time between 12:58 and 1:25 a.m. The National Archives and Records Administration prepared the following log of this conversation. [Segment 1] Watergate -White House response -The President's possible resignation -Effect -Public support for the President -White Paper -Effect on stock market -Effect on the President -J. Fred Buzhardt, Jr.'s stories -John W. Dean, III's possible statements -Elliot L. Richardson -Richardson -Meeting with Haig -Rogers C. B. Morton -Suicide of unknown congressman -Congressional response -Hugh Scott -Haig's conversation with Leslie C. Arends -Meeting, May 23 -Kissinger -Forthcoming press briefing, May 29 -White House response -The President's speech, May 24 -Press response -Daniel Ellsberg [Segment 2] Watergate -Archibald Cox -Possible actions -White House response -Ronald L. Ziegler -Press -Kissinger's comments to Jerry L. Schecter -The President's opponents' goals Page 1 Conversation Number 39-16 (continued) [Segment 3] Watergate -Effect on administration -Soviet summit -Confidence in the President **************************************************************** ** BEGIN WITHDRAWN ITEM NO. 2 [Privacy] [Duration: 13 s ] END WITHDRAWN ITEM NO. 2 **************************************************************** *** -Claude S. Brinegar -Earl L. Butz and Morton -James R. Schlesinger -Richardson -Possible actions -Cox -Possible trials -The President's accomplishments [Segment 4] Watergate -Effect on the President -Possible resignation -The Vice President -Effect on nation -The President's opponents' goals -White House response -The President's foreign policy activities -Dean -Possible statement -White House response Page 2 Conversation Number 45-75 Portion of a telephone conversation between the President and Stephen B. Bull. This portion was recorded on May 1, 1973 between 12:59 and 1:00 p.m. [This conversation is cross- referenced with conversation 433-6.] The National Archives and Records Administration prepared the following log of this conversation. Watergate -Language of memo -William P. Rogers' review -Leonard Garment -Intent -Access to papers of H. R. Haldeman and John D. Ehrlichman -Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) -President's reaction Conversation Number 45-77 Portion of a telephone conversation between the President and Stephen B. Bull. This portion was recorded on May 1, 1973 between 1:04 and 1:06 p.m. [This conversation is cross- referenced with conversation 433-9.] The National Archives and Records Administration prepared the following log of this conversation. Watergate -Language of a memo -William P. Rogers -Leonard Garment -President's reaction -Access to papers -H. R. Haldeman, John D. Ehrlichman -Bull's conversation with Garment -Garment's reaction -President's ownership of papers -Personal communication -National security information -Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) -Instructions to Garment Conversation Number 45-79 Portion of a telephone conversation between the President and Stephen B. Bull. This portion was recorded on May 1, 1973 between 1:07 and 1:08 p.m. [This conversation is cross- referenced with conversation 433-11.] The National Archives and Records Administration prepared the following log of this conversation. Watergate -Staff member files -Ownership -National security -Watergate -Leonard Garment's memorandum -William P. Rogers Conversation Number 45-84 Portion of a telephone conversation between the President and Leslie C. Arends. This portion was recorded on May 1, 1973 between 1:18 and 1:20 p.m. [This conversation is cross-referenced with conversation 433-16.] The National Archives and Records Administration prepared the following log of this conversation. Watergate -Arends' conversation with Gerald R. Ford -President's April 30, 1973 speech -Resignations of John D. Ehrlichman and H. R. Haldeman -President Eisenhower and Sherman Adams -Congressional reaction -President's speech -Congressional reaction -Fred Schwengel -Need for Republican Congressional speeches -Samuel L. Devine -Charles H. Percy ***************************************************************** BEGIN WITHDRAWN ITEM NO. 2 [Privacy] [Duration: 2 s ] END WITHDRAWN ITEM NO. 2 ***************************************************************** -Special prosecutor -Elliot L. Richardson -Possible attacks by Congressmen Conversation Number 45-87 Portion of a telephone conversation between the President and Gerald R. Ford. This portion was recorded on May 1, 1973 between 1:24 and 1:26 p.m. [This conversation is cross-referenced with conversation 433-19.] The National Archives and Records Administration prepared the following log of this conversation. Watergate -Ford's note -Need for Republican counterattack -President's previous speech -President's Congressional supporters -Resignations of John D. Ehrlichman and H. R. Haldeman -Need for Republican counterattack -Charles H. Percy -Special prosecutor -Elliot L. Richardson -Hamilton Fish's conversation with Ford Conversation Number 45-91 Portion of a telephone conversation between the President and Stephen B. Bull. This portion was recorded on May 1, 1973 between 2:51 and 2:52 p.m. [This conversation is cross-referenced with conversation 433-24.] The National Archives and Records Administration prepared the following log of this conversation. Watergate -Leonard Garment's memo -William P. Rogers -President's ownership of papers -Purpose -Orders to Bull Conversation Number 45-93 Portion of a telephone conversation between the President and Ronald L. Ziegler. This portion was recorded on May 1, 1973 between 2:59 and 3:01 p.m. [This conversation is cross-referenced with conversation 433-27.] The National Archives and Records Administration prepared the following log of this conversation. Watergate -Ziegler's previous press briefing -Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) activities -H. R. Haldeman and John D. Ehrlichman -Leonard Garment's memo ***************************************************************** BEGIN WITHDRAWN ITEM NO. 1 [Privacy] [Duration: 3 s ] END WITHDRAWN ITEM NO. 1 ****************************************************************** -Ziegler's previous press briefing -Elliot L. Richardson's authority -Washington Post -Attitude of press Conversation Number 45-98 Portion of a telephone conversation between the President and Alexander M. Haig, Jr. This portion was recorded on May 1, 1973 between 5:43 and 5:44 p.m. [This conversation is cross-referenced with conversation 433-33.] The National Archives and Records Administration prepared the following log of this conversation. Watergate -President's previous speech -Reaction -President's conversation with Haig, April 30, 1973 -Morale Conversation Number 45-101 Portion of a telephone conversation between the President and Stephen B. Bull. This portion was recorded on May 1, 1973 between 5:53 and 5:54 p.m. [This conversation is cross-referenced with conversation 433-37.] The National Archives and Records Administration prepared the following log of this conversation. Watergate -Bull call to H. R. Haldeman -President's meeting with Cabinet -Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) -Memorandum -William P. Rogers -Invitation to Haldeman, Ehrlichman and families Conversation Number 45-102 Portion of a telephone conversation between the President and Hobart D. Lewis. This portion was recorded on May 1, 1973 between 5:57 and 5:58 p.m. [This conversation is cross-referenced with conversation 433-38, segment 2.] The National Archives and Records Administration prepared the following log of this conversation. Lewis' location -Richard A. Moore's office Lewis' call to President, April 30, 1973 Watergate -President's previous speech -Reaction President's activities Conversation Number 45-106 Portion of a telephone conversation between the President and Robert H. Finch. This portion was recorded on May 1, 1973 between 6:44 and 6:47 p.m. [This conversation is cross-referenced with conversation 433-44.] The National Archives
Load more

  1089
Copy Link
Recommended publications
  • Krogh & the Watergate Scandal
    Krogh & the Watergate Scandal Egil “Bud” Krogh was a young lawyer who worked for the Nixon administration in the late 1960s and early 1970s as deputy assistant to the president. Military analyst Daniel Ellsberg leaked the “Pentagon Papers,” which contained sensitive information regarding the United States’ progress in the Vietnam War. President Nixon himself tasked Krogh with stopping leaks of top-secret information. And Nixon’s Assistant for Domestic Affairs, John Ehrlichman, instructed Krogh to investigate and discredit Ellsberg, telling Krogh that the leak was damaging to national security. Krogh and another staffer assembled a covert team that became known as the “plumbers” (to stop leaks), which was broadly supervised by Ehrlichman. In September 1971, the plumbers’ first break-in was at the office of Ellsberg’s psychiatrist; they were looking for documents that would discredit Ellsberg based on mental health. Reflecting on the meeting in which the break-in was proposed and approved, Krogh later wrote, “I listened intently. At no time did I or anyone else there question whether the operation was necessary, legal or moral. Convinced that we were responding legitimately to a national security crisis, we focused instead on the operational details: who would do what, when and where.” The break-in, which was illegal, was also unproductive. Nothing was found to discredit Ellsberg. Importantly, the ties between this break-in and Nixon were much more direct and easy to establish than the ties between Nixon and the Watergate break-in. Krogh later pled guilty to his role in the break-in and was sentenced to two-to-six years in prison.
    [Show full text]
  • Presidents Worksheet 43 Secretaries of State (#1-24)
    PRESIDENTS WORKSHEET 43 NAME SOLUTION KEY SECRETARIES OF STATE (#1-24) Write the number of each president who matches each Secretary of State on the left. Some entries in each column will match more than one in the other column. Each president will be matched at least once. 9,10,13 Daniel Webster 1 George Washington 2 John Adams 14 William Marcy 3 Thomas Jefferson 18 Hamilton Fish 4 James Madison 5 James Monroe 5 John Quincy Adams 6 John Quincy Adams 12,13 John Clayton 7 Andrew Jackson 8 Martin Van Buren 7 Martin Van Buren 9 William Henry Harrison 21 Frederick Frelinghuysen 10 John Tyler 11 James Polk 6 Henry Clay (pictured) 12 Zachary Taylor 15 Lewis Cass 13 Millard Fillmore 14 Franklin Pierce 1 John Jay 15 James Buchanan 19 William Evarts 16 Abraham Lincoln 17 Andrew Johnson 7, 8 John Forsyth 18 Ulysses S. Grant 11 James Buchanan 19 Rutherford B. Hayes 20 James Garfield 3 James Madison 21 Chester Arthur 22/24 Grover Cleveland 20,21,23James Blaine 23 Benjamin Harrison 10 John Calhoun 18 Elihu Washburne 1 Thomas Jefferson 22/24 Thomas Bayard 4 James Monroe 23 John Foster 2 John Marshall 16,17 William Seward PRESIDENTS WORKSHEET 44 NAME SOLUTION KEY SECRETARIES OF STATE (#25-43) Write the number of each president who matches each Secretary of State on the left. Some entries in each column will match more than one in the other column. Each president will be matched at least once. 32 Cordell Hull 25 William McKinley 28 William Jennings Bryan 26 Theodore Roosevelt 40 Alexander Haig 27 William Howard Taft 30 Frank Kellogg 28 Woodrow Wilson 29 Warren Harding 34 John Foster Dulles 30 Calvin Coolidge 42 Madeleine Albright 31 Herbert Hoover 25 John Sherman 32 Franklin D.
    [Show full text]
  • Page 1 of 3 Context of '1969: ITT Negotiates with Nixon Aides To
    Context of '1969: ITT Negotiates with Nixon Aides to Avoid Antitrust Lawsuit' Page 1 of 3 !Donate Home | Contact UserName Login Not registered yet? About Timelines Blog Donate Volunteer Search Go !! History Commons Alert, Exciting News Home » Context of '1969: ITT Negotiates with Nixon Aides to Avoid Antitrust Lawsuit' Printer-Friendly View Email to Friend Context of '1969: ITT Negotiates with Nixon Aides to Avoid Antitrust Increase Text Size Lawsuit' Decrease Text Size Ordering Date ascending This is a scalable context timeline. It contains events related to the event 1969: ITT Negotiates with Nixon Aides to Avoid Antitrust Lawsuit. You can narrow or Time period broaden the context of this timeline by adjusting the zoom level. The lower the scale, the more relevant the items on average will be, while the higher the scale, Email Updates the less relevant the items, on average, will be. Receive weekly email updates 1 2 3 4 5 summarizing what contributors have added to the History Commons database Email Address Here Go 1969: ITT Negotiates with Nixon Aides to Avoid Antitrust Lawsuit Donate International Telephone and Telegraph (ITT) acquires three Developing and maintaining smaller corporations, prompting the US Justice Department to this site is very labor file suits against ITT charging that the mergers violate antitrust intensive. If you find it useful, laws. Between 1969 and April 1971, ITT officials meet with please give us a hand and donate what you can. several Nixon administration officials, including Vice President Donate Now Spiro Agnew; White House aides John Ehrlichman, Charles ITT logo. [Source: Colson, and Egil Krogh; Cabinet secretaries John Connally and Private Line.com] Maurice Stans; Justice Department officials John Mitchell and Volunteer Richard Kleindienst; and others, in attempts to persuade the If you would like to help us administration to drop the lawsuits.
    [Show full text]
  • Notes and Sources for Evil Geniuses: the Unmaking of America: a Recent History
    Notes and Sources for Evil Geniuses: The Unmaking of America: A Recent History Introduction xiv “If infectious greed is the virus” Kurt Andersen, “City of Schemes,” The New York Times, Oct. 6, 2002. xvi “run of pedal-to-the-medal hypercapitalism” Kurt Andersen, “American Roulette,” New York, December 22, 2006. xx “People of the same trade” Adam Smith, The Wealth of Nations, ed. Andrew Skinner, 1776 (London: Penguin, 1999) Book I, Chapter X. Chapter 1 4 “The discovery of America offered” Alexis de Tocqueville, Democracy In America, trans. Arthur Goldhammer (New York: Library of America, 2012), Book One, Introductory Chapter. 4 “A new science of politics” Tocqueville, Democracy In America, Book One, Introductory Chapter. 4 “The inhabitants of the United States” Tocqueville, Democracy In America, Book One, Chapter XVIII. 5 “there was virtually no economic growth” Robert J Gordon. “Is US economic growth over? Faltering innovation confronts the six headwinds.” Policy Insight No. 63. Centre for Economic Policy Research, September, 2012. --Thomas Piketty, “World Growth from the Antiquity (growth rate per period),” Quandl. 6 each citizen’s share of the economy Richard H. Steckel, “A History of the Standard of Living in the United States,” in EH.net (Economic History Association, 2020). --Andrew McAfee and Erik Brynjolfsson, The Second Machine Age: Work, Progress, and Prosperity in a Time of Brilliant Technologies (New York: W.W. Norton, 2016), p. 98. 6 “Constant revolutionizing of production” Friedrich Engels and Karl Marx, Manifesto of the Communist Party (Moscow: Progress Publishers, 1969), Chapter I. 7 from the early 1840s to 1860 Tomas Nonnenmacher, “History of the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Madeleine Albright, Gender, and Foreign Policy-Making
    Journal of Political Science Volume 33 Number 1 Article 2 November 2005 Madeleine Albright, Gender, and Foreign Policy-Making Kevin J. Lasher Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.coastal.edu/jops Part of the Political Science Commons Recommended Citation Lasher, Kevin J. (2005) "Madeleine Albright, Gender, and Foreign Policy-Making," Journal of Political Science: Vol. 33 : No. 1 , Article 2. Available at: https://digitalcommons.coastal.edu/jops/vol33/iss1/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Politics at CCU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of Political Science by an authorized editor of CCU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Madeleine Albright , Gender, and Foreign Policy-Making Kevin J. Lashe r Francis Marion University Women are finally becoming major participants in the U.S. foreign policy-making establishment . I seek to un­ derstand how th e arrival of women foreign policy-makers might influence the outcome of U.S. foreign polic y by fo­ cusi ng 011 th e activities of Mad elei n e A !bright , the first wo man to hold the position of Secretary of State . I con­ clude that A !bright 's gender did hav e some modest im­ pact. Gender helped Albright gain her position , it affected the manner in which she carried out her duties , and it facilitated her working relationship with a Repub­ lican Congress. But A !bright 's gender seemed to have had relatively little effect on her ideology and policy recom­ mendations . ver the past few decades more and more women have won election to public office and obtained high-level Oappointive positions in government, and this trend is likely to continue well into the 21st century.
    [Show full text]
  • Intelligence Legalism and the National Security Agency's Civil Liberties
    112 Harvard National Security Journal / Vol. 6 ARTICLE Intelligence Legalism and the National Security Agency’s Civil Liberties Gap __________________________ Margo Schlanger* * Henry M. Butzel Professor of Law, University of Michigan. I have greatly benefited from conversations with John DeLong, Mort Halperin, Alex Joel, David Kris, Marty Lederman, Nancy Libin, Rick Perlstein, Becky Richards, and several officials who prefer not to be named, all of whom generously spent time with me, discussing the issues in this article, and many of whom also helped again after reading the piece in draft. I would also like to extend thanks to Sam Bagenstos, Rick Lempert, Daphna Renan, Alex Rossmiller, Adrian Vermeule, Steve Vladeck, Marcy Wheeler, Shirin Sinnar and other participants in the 7th Annual National Security Law Workshop, participants at the University of Iowa law faculty workshop, and my colleagues at the University of Michigan Legal Theory Workshop and governance group lunch, who offered me extremely helpful feedback. Jennifer Gitter and Lauren Dayton provided able research assistance. All errors are, of course, my responsibility. Copyright © 2015 by the Presidents and Fellows of Harvard College and Margo Schlanger. 2015 / Intelligence Legalism and the NSA’s Civil Liberties Gaps 113 Abstract Since June 2013, we have seen unprecedented security breaches and disclosures relating to American electronic surveillance. The nearly daily drip, and occasional gush, of once-secret policy and operational information makes it possible to analyze and understand National Security Agency activities, including the organizations and processes inside and outside the NSA that are supposed to safeguard American’s civil liberties as the agency goes about its intelligence gathering business.
    [Show full text]
  • Daniel Ellsberg
    This document is made available through the declassification efforts and research of John Greenewald, Jr., creator of: The Black Vault The Black Vault is the largest online Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) document clearinghouse in the world. The research efforts here are responsible for the declassification of hundreds of thousands of pages released by the U.S. Government & Military. Discover the Truth at: http://www.theblackvault.com NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY CENTRAL SECURITY SERVICE FORT GEORGE G. MEADE, MARYLAND 20755-6000 FOIA Case: 101038A 10 July 2017 JOHN GREENEWALD Dear Mr. Greenewald: This is our final response to your Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request of 6 March 2017 for Intellipedia entries on "PENTAGON PAPERS" and/ or "Daniel Ells berg" and/ or "Daniel Sheehan" as well as any search results pages. A copy of your request is enclosed. As stated in our initial response to you, dated 7 March 20 17, your request was assigned Case Number 101038. For purposes of this request and based on the information you provided in your letter, you are considered an "all other" requester. As such, you are allowed 2 hours of search and the duplication of 100 pages at no cost. There are no assessable fees for this request. Your request has been processed under the provisions of the FOIA. For your information, NSA provides a service of common concern for the Intelligence Community (IC) by serving as the executive agent for Intelink. As such, NSA provides technical services that enable users to access and share information with peers and stakeholders across the IC and DoD.
    [Show full text]
  • John Mitchell and the Crimes of Watergate Reconsidered Gerald Caplan Pacific Cgem Orge School of Law
    University of the Pacific Scholarly Commons McGeorge School of Law Scholarly Articles McGeorge School of Law Faculty Scholarship 2010 The akM ing of the Attorney General: John Mitchell and the Crimes of Watergate Reconsidered Gerald Caplan Pacific cGeM orge School of Law Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.pacific.edu/facultyarticles Part of the Legal Biography Commons, and the President/Executive Department Commons Recommended Citation 41 McGeorge L. Rev. 311 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the McGeorge School of Law Faculty Scholarship at Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in McGeorge School of Law Scholarly Articles by an authorized administrator of Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Book Review Essay The Making of the Attorney General: John Mitchell and the Crimes of Watergate Reconsidered Gerald Caplan* I. INTRODUCTION Shortly after I resigned my position as General Counsel of the District of Columbia Metropolitan Police Department in 1971, I was startled to receive a two-page letter from Attorney General John Mitchell. I was not a Department of Justice employee, and Mitchell's acquaintance with me was largely second-hand. The contents were surprising. Mitchell generously lauded my rather modest role "in developing an effective and professional law enforcement program for the District of Columbia." Beyond this, he added, "Your thoughtful suggestions have been of considerable help to me and my colleagues at the Department of Justice." The salutation was, "Dear Jerry," and the signature, "John." I was elated. I framed the letter and hung it in my office.
    [Show full text]
  • Nuclear Notes
    a report of the csis project on nuclear issues Nuclear Notes Volume 2, Issue 1 1800 K Street, NW | Washington, DC 20006 Editors Tel: (202) 887-0200 | Fax: (202) 775-3199 Stephanie Spies E-mail: [email protected] | Web: www.csis.org Mark Jansson Authors Jonah Friedman Eli Jacobs Yogesh Joshi Henry Philippens Alankrita Sinha Stephanie Spies Heather Williams June 2012 CHARTING our future Blank a report of the csis project on nuclear issues Nuclear Notes Volume 2, Issue 1 Editors Stephanie Spies Mark Jansson Authors Jonah Friedman Eli Jacobs Yogesh Joshi Henry Philippens Alankrita Sinha Stephanie Spies Heather Williams June 2012 CHARTING our future About CSIS—50th Anniversary Year For 50 years, the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) has developed practical solutions to the world’s greatest challenges. As we celebrate this milestone, CSIS scholars continue to provide strategic insights and bipartisan policy solutions to help decisionmakers chart a course toward a better world. CSIS is a bipartisan, nonprofit organization headquartered in Washington, D.C. The Center’s 220 full- time staff and large network of affiliated scholars conduct research and analysis and develop policy initia- tives that look into the future and anticipate change. Since 1962, CSIS has been dedicated to finding ways to sustain American prominence and prosperity as a force for good in the world. After 50 years, CSIS has become one of the world’s preeminent international policy institutions focused on defense and security; regional stability; and transnational challenges ranging from energy and climate to global development and economic integration. Former U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • TRACING the DISCOURSE of AMERICAN EXCEPTIONALISM by Aron Tabor
    DOES EXCEPTION PROVE THE RULE? TRACING THE DISCOURSE OF AMERICAN EXCEPTIONALISM By Aron Tabor Submitted to Central European University Doctoral School of Political Science, Public Policy and International Relations In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Political Science Supervisor: Alexander Astrov Word Count: 91,719 Budapest, Hungary 2019 ii Declaration I hereby declare that no parts of this thesis have been accepted for any other degrees in any other institutions. This thesis contains no material previously written and/or published by another person, except where appropriate acknowledgement is made in the form of bibliographical reference. Aron Tabor April 26, 2019 iii iv Abstract The first two decades of the twenty-first century saw an unprecedented proliferation of the discourse of American exceptionalism both in scholarly works and in the world of politics; several recent contributions have characterized this notion in the context of a set of beliefs that create, construct, (re-)define and reproduce a particular foreign policy identity. At the same time, some authors also note that the term “American exceptionalism” itself was born in a specific discourse within U.S. Communism, and, for a period, it was primarily understood with reference to the peculiar causes behind the absence of a strong socialist movement in the United States. The connection between this original meaning and the later usage is not fully explored; often it is assumed that “exceptionalism” existed before the label was created as the idea is traced back to the founding of the American nation or even to the colonial period.
    [Show full text]
  • Gaede to Be Law Alumni Association President
    VOLUME 7 Contents 2 Editor's Column 3 Forum 4 Francois-Xavier Martin: Printer, Lawyer, Jurist/ Michael C. Chiorazzi 14 W7.ry the Candidates Still Use FDR as Their Measure/ William E. Leuchtenburg 25 Conference Report: Empirical Studies of Civil Procedure 27 About the School 28 A Perspective on Placement DEAN EDITOR ASSOCIATE EDITOR Pamela B. Gann Evelyn M. Pursley Janse Conover Haywood NUMBER 1 35 The Docket 36 In the Public Interest 46 Alumna Profile: Pamela B. Gann 73 50 Book Review: 1999: Victory Without War by Richard M. Nixon '37 52 Specially Noted 56 Alumni Activities 64 Upcoming Events Duke Law Magazine is published under the auspices of the Office of the Dean, Duke University School of Law, Durham, North Carolina 27706 © Duke University 1989 BUSINESS MANAGER SUPPORT SERVICE PRODUCTION Mary Jane Flowers Evelyn Holt-Fuller Graphic Arts Services DUKE LAW MAGAZINE 12 Editor '5 Column The American legal world has pirical Studies of Civil Procedure article focuses on some our alumni changed greatly since the beginnings discusses the thought and efforts involved in such practice in a variety of our republic and continues to of some legal scholars who see em­ of ways and also reports on some change at a rapid rate. Though much pirical study as a method for effect­ law School programs designed to in the scene on our cover would ing possible changes in the legal encourage such interest. Our alum­ still be familiar in a modern law system. na proftle reports on our new dean, office (most lawyers I visit have The About the School section Pamela Gann '73.
    [Show full text]
  • The Inventory of the Edward Jay Epstein Collection #818
    The Inventory of the Edward Jay Epstein Collection #818 Howard Gotlieb Archival Research Center ... , EPSTEIN, EDWARD JAY (1935- ) Deposit May 1979 The Edward Jay Epstein Collection consists primarily of research material for three of Mr. Epstein's more prominent works: LEGEND: THE SECRET WORLD OF LEE HARVEY OSWALD, a study of the activ­ ities of the assassin of President John F. Kennedy prior to the assas­ sination; AGENCY OF FEAR: OPIATES AND POLITICAL POWER IN AMERICA, an investigation of the Nixon Admi.nistration's war on drugs in the early 197Os; and NEWS FROM NOWHERE: TELEVISION AND THE NEWS, a report on electronic journalism and the television industry•. The·~_Epstein Col­ lection also contains galleys and some notes pertaining to BETWEEN FACT AND FICTION: THE PROBLEM OF JOURNALISM as well as drafts of some of Mr. Epstein's articles and reviews. In addition, there are small amounts of personal material including correspondence and syllabi and student papers from college courses taught by Mr. Epstein and bits and pieces of various research projects. The extensive research material for LEGEND includes FBI, CIA, Secret Service and State Department files on Lee Harvey Oswald and Marina.·. Oswald, reports and interviews with Marines who served with Oswald and other persons who knew him and had contact with him prior to the Kennedy assassination. The AGENCY OF FEAR material contains a lengthy transcript of an interview with Egil Krogh, Deputy Assistant to the President for Domestic Affairs in the Nixon White House, and the White House files of Krogh and Jeffrey Donfeld, Staff Assistant to President Nixon, per­ taining to the Administration's war on drugs.
    [Show full text]