DOCSLIB.ORG

December 21, 2006 37-2-6-1; 10-64-0; Ccm 2006-000467

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
December 21, 2006 37-2-6-1; 10-64-0; Ccm 2006-000467 950729.tif December 21, 2006 37-2-6-1; 10-64-0; ccm 2006-000467 The Honourable Rona Ambrose, P.C., M.P. Minister of the Environment Les Terrasses de la Chaudière 10 Wellington Street, 28th Floor Gatineau, QC KIA OH3 Subject: Deep Geologic Repository Project - Environmental Assessment Recommendation Dear Minister: Ontario Power Generation Inc. (OPG) notified the Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission (Commission) on December 2, 2005, of its intent to seek the Commission’s approval to prepare a site, construct and operate a Deep Geologic Repository (DGR) on the Bruce Nuclear Site within the Municipality of Kincardine, Ontario. The DGR would be located approximately 1.5 km from the Lake Huron shoreline and would be constructed in the sedimentary rock approximately 500 to 700 meters below the ground surface. The purpose of the DGR would be for the long-term storage of low and intermediate level radioactive waste. The Commission’s authorization of OPG’s request would ultimately require the issuance of licences under the Nuclear Safety and Control Act (NSCA). Before considering OPG’s application for the necessary licences under the NSCA, the Commission must determine the results of an environmental assessment (EA). This determination includes making a decision on the potential for the project to cause adverse environmental effects, and determining a subsequent course of action under the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act (CEA Act). As OPG’s DGR Project falls within the Comprehensive Study List Regulations of the CEA Act and is subject to a comprehensive study, the Commission is required to submit an Environmental Assessment Track Report to you, as the federal Minister of the Environment, including a Recommendation on the proposed track for the EA to either continue the EA as a comprehensive study or refer the EA to a review panel or mediator. The Commission is the sole responsible authority for this EA. …/2 The Hon. Rona Ambrose, P.C., M.P. - 2 - ccm 2006-000467 In establishing the process to assist the Commission in making its recommendation, the Commission determined that it was appropriate to hold a public hearing on the matter. A hearing was held on October 23, 2006, in Kincardine, Ontario. The hearing was conducted in accordance with the Commission’s process for determining matters under the CEA Act and Rule 3 of the Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission Rules of Procedure. During the public hearing, the Commission received written submissions and heard oral presentations from Commission staff and OPG. The Commission also considered oral and written submissions from 57 intervenors. The Commission, in making its decision, considered all the information presented at the hearing. Its detailed Record of Proceedings, including Reasons for Decision, is enclosed for your information. It will be published today in both official languages. Pursuant to subsection 21 (2) of the CEA Act and following the public consultation on the Environmental Assessment Scoping Document and the public hearing of the Commission, the Commission prepared the Environmental Assessment Track Decision Report. The Report covers the following: the scope of the project; the factors to be considered in its assessment and the scope of those factors; public concerns in relation to the project; the potential of the project to cause adverse environmental effects; and the ability of the comprehensive study to address issues relating to the project. Finally, the Report includes the recommendation that the DGR Project EA be undertaken by means of a review panel. As the sole responsible authority, the Commission hereby submits to you the Environmental Assessment Track Decision Report for the DGR Project. Should you accept the recommendation that the proposed project be referred to a review panel, the Commission wishes to advise you that it is available to discuss process options to further assist in the effective conduct of this review, including the option of the Commission leading the review panel. This offer is based on the extensive expertise and experience of the Commission, and its Governor in Council (GiC) appointed members, in nuclear projects in Canada, its international network and its status as an independent agency and court of record under the NSCA. Yours truly, Original signed by Linda J. Keen c.c. The Honourable Gary Lunn, P.C., M.P., Minister of Natural Resources Mr. Jean-Claude Bouchard, President, Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency Mr. James Hankinson, President and CEO, Ontario Power Generation Enclosures: - Record of Proceedings, including Reasons for Decision - Environmental Assessment Track Decision Report Environmental Assessment Track Report Ontario Power Generation’s Proposed Deep Geologic Repository for Low and Intermediate Level Radioactive Waste December 2006 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 Introduction ___________________________________________________________ 1 2.0 Project Overview _______________________________________________________ 2 3.0 Scope of Assessment_____________________________________________________ 2 4.0 Public Consultation _____________________________________________________ 3 4.1 CNSC Staff Lead Consultation _______________________________________________ 3 4.1.1 Advertising for Public Comment _____________________________________________________3 4.1.2 Summary of Comments Received ____________________________________________________4 4.1.3 First Nations Consultation __________________________________________________________5 4.2 Public Hearing of the Commission_____________________________________________ 6 4.2.1 Advertising for Public Hearing_______________________________________________________6 4.2.2 Summary of Public Concerns Voiced at the Public Hearing of the Commission _________________6 5.0 Potential of the Project to Cause Adverse Environmental Effects_________________ 7 5.1 Potential Adverse Effects during Site Preparation________________________________ 8 5.2 Potential Adverse Effects during Construction __________________________________ 8 5.3 Potential Adverse Effects during Operation _____________________________________ 9 5.4 Potential Adverse Effects in the Long Term _____________________________________ 9 6.0 Ability of the Comprehensive Study to Address Issues Relating to the Project______ 10 6.1 Public Concerns ___________________________________________________________ 10 6.2 Commission Concerns______________________________________________________ 13 7.0 Summary and Recommendation __________________________________________ 14 8.0 References ___________________________________________________________ 14 APPENDIX 1: Environmental Assessment Scoping Document APPENDIX 2: Notices Requesting Public Comment on the Scoping Document and for the Pubic Hearing APPENDIX 3: Table of Predicted Effects EA Track Report December 2006 1.0 Introduction In a letter dated December 2, 2005 (Ref. 1), Ontario Power Generation (OPG) indicated its intent to prepare a site and construct a Deep Geologic Repository (DGR) on the Bruce Nuclear Site that is located within the Municipality of Kincardine, Ontario. The proposal involves the preparation, construction and operation of the DGR. This is an undertaking in relation to a physical work and, as such, is a “project” as defined under Section 2 of the CEAA. The CNSC issues licences for activities involved in OPG’s proposal under the authority of Section 24(2) of the Nuclear Safety and Control Act (NSCA), which is prescribed on the Law List Regulations. Therefore there is a “trigger” for an EA pursuant to paragraph 5(1)(d) of the CEAA. There are no identified exclusions from environmental assessment for this project, pursuant to Section 7 of the CEAA and the Exclusion List Regulations of the CEAA. Accordingly, CNSC must conduct a federal EA in accordance with the provisions of the CEAA prior to consideration of an application to authorize the project under the NSCA. The CNSC is the only Responsible Authority for the project as defined under the CEAA. Environment Canada, Natural Resources Canada and Health Canada have identified themselves as federal authorities and will provide expert advice in relation to the environmental assessment upon request. The Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency (the Agency) is the federal environmental assessment coordinator (FEAC) for the proposed project and is responsible for coordinating the review activities of the responsible authority and expert federal authorities in accordance with Section 12 of the CEAA. The proposed project is subject to a comprehensive study under the CEAA, because the proposal would involve the construction of a new Class 1B facility on a site not within the boundaries of an existing licensed nuclear facility, and would be used for the management of radioactive nuclear substances. As such, under Part VI, Section 19(g)(iii) of the Comprehensive Study Regulations of the CEAA, and pursuant to Section 21 of the CEAA, the CNSC must ensure that a Comprehensive Study of the project is initiated, and that a report must be provided to the federal Minister of the Environment. This report has been prepared by the Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission for the Minister of the Environment under section 21 of the CEAA. The report describes and discusses: • the scope of the project; • the factors to be considered in its assessment and the scope of those factors; • public concerns in relation to the project; • the potential of the project to cause adverse environmental effects; and • the ability of the comprehensive study to address issues
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Paramedic Services 2020 Business Plan
    2020 Bruce County Business Plan Department: Paramedic Services Strategic Priorities: 1. Find creative ways to engage our public. Make the county fully accessible to people through access to information. Engage in cross-departmental streamlining – specialize in the solution, not the department. 2. Explore alternate options to improve efficiency and service. Develop a system for measuring our processes and their successful desired outcome. Look for economy of scale or shared services among our departments and our communities. Coordinate working with other agencies. 3. Develop Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) that are meaningful and report on them. Set measurable goals and evaluate against them. Build in accountability and evaluation mechanisms. 4. Eliminate our own red tape. Focus on the internal and the external customer / client needs first and eliminate all duplications of services and data. 2020 Bruce County Business Plan - Key Performance Indicators: 2015 2016 2017 2019 2020 to date Indicator 2018 2020 Budget Actual Actual Actual Actual (Q2) Actual Total paramedic responses per 1,000 population 97 98 102 103 104 47 106 Average length of time from crew notification to P 13:25 P 13:45 P 13:31 P: 13:26 P 13:35 P: 14:17 P 13:35 arrival for Code 3 and 4 calls. L 9:28 L 9:48 L 9:28 L: 9:40 L 9:30 L: 9:53 L 9:30 I 9:07 I 8:46 I 8:37 I: 9:20 I 8:30 I: 9:27 I 8:30 C 10:47 C10:40 C 10:25 C: 10:36 C 10:30 C: 11:03 C 10:30 Length of time from crew notification to arrival for P 24:41 P 24:23 P: 25:20 P: 24:37 P: 24:30 P: 26:06 P 24:30 the highest priority calls – 90th percentile.
    [Show full text]
  • CLIMATE CHANGE and PUBLIC HEALTH in GREY BRUCE HEALTH UNIT Current Conditions and Future Projections
    CLIMATE CHANGE AND PUBLIC HEALTH IN GREY BRUCE HEALTH UNIT Current Conditions and Future Projections 2017 0 ABOUT THIS REPORT This report was completed as part of a Master of Public Health practicum placement by Gillian Jordan of Lakehead University during the summer of 2017 under the supervision of Robert Hart and Alanna Leffley of Grey Bruce Health Unit. Acknowledgements Much of this report was inspired by past work conducted by Stephen Lam, Krista Youngblood, and Dr. Ian Arra. This report is meant to build upon and accompany these previous reports to assist in furthering climate change-related understanding and planning of adaptation activities in Grey Bruce. Special thanks to Bob Hart and Alanna Leffley for their guidance and assistance throughout the report process; additional thanks to Virginia McFarland for her help with data analysis. Suggested Citation: Grey Bruce Health Unit. (2017). Climate Change and Public Health in Grey Bruce Health Unit: Current conditions and future projections. Owen Sound, Ontario. Grey Bruce Health Unit. 0 CONTENTS Table of Figures ............................................................................................................................................. ii Executive Summary ...................................................................................................................................... iii Introduction .................................................................................................................................................. 1 Climate Change
    [Show full text]
  • The Chippewas of Saugeen First Nation, Et Al V the Attorney General of Canada, Et Al Defendants (Court File No.: 94-CQ-50872 CM)
    The Chippewas of Saugeen First Nation, et al v The Attorney General of Canada, et al Defendants (Court File No.: 94-CQ-50872 CM) Chippewas of Nawash First Nation and Saugeen First Nation v Attorney General of Canada, et al (Court File No.: 03-CV-261134CM1) APPENDIX B – MAPS INDEX TAB TITLE EX 1 Exhibit P (annotated) - SON claims map with southeast corner removed P 2 Fishing Access Map Annotated by Jay Jones 3999 3 Copy of Exhibit Q, showing Grey and Bruce Counties, annotated by Doran 4000 Ritchie 4 Map of harvesting areas on the northern Peninsula, annotated by Doran Ritchie 4002 5 Map of harvesting areas in the central Peninsula, annotated by Doran Ritchie 4004 6 Map of harvesting areas on the southern Peninsula annotated by Doran Ritchie 4006 7 Map of harvesting areas in the eastern portion of SON Territory, to the south 4008 of the Peninsula, annotated by Doran Ritchie 8 Map of harvesting areas on the western portion of SON Territory annotated by 4010 Doran Ritchie 9 Aide Memoire Paul Nadjiwan 4013 10 Grey County annotated map annotated by Paul Nadjiwan 4014 11 Map of the Great Lakes posts, circa 1763 4023 12 ASF -Bluffs at Neyaashiinigmiing 4235 13 Location of Sites Discussed in Text within or near the SON Traditional 4241 (p.30) Territory 14 SON Commercial Fishery Harvest, 1995-2018 4320 2 - 15 Map of ASF Regarding Indian Presence on and use of Land South of the Visual Aid Indian Line after 1836 16 Map of hunting and harvesting locations used by SON community members Visual Aid Exhibit 3999 is a map of fishing access points, annotated by Jay Jones.
    [Show full text]
  • The Community Well-Being (CWB) Index, 2016
    e r è Lac i v i 93° W 90° W 87° W 84° W 81° W 78° W Guillaume-Delisle 75° W 72° W 69° W R N ° 4 5 Well-Being in First Nation: N ° 7 5 The Community Well-Being (CWB) Index, 2016 Ontario Hudson Bay Fort Severn 89 !¸ Fort Severn r e iv R n r e v e Peawanuck S ·! MANITOBA CWB Index Score Range, 2016 ¸ 0 - 49 Little ¸ Sachigo Lake Severn 50 - 59 Lake Kitchenuhmaykoosib Higher scores N Aaki 84 ° ¸ ¸ 1 Sachigo Bearskin Lake indicate a greater 5 N (Big Trout La¸ ke) ° La¸ ke 1 ·! 4 ! Wapekeka 2 60 - 69 5 Big Trout Lake ! Kasabonika level of socio-economic La¸ ke NUNAVUT Sachigo Big Trout well-being. Lake Lake Kasabonika Attawapiskat ¸ Lake ^ 70 - 79 91A !P ^ r ive t R ka James Bay pis Attawapiskat wa ^ 80 - 100 tta ^ Muskrat A Dam Lake ·! Muskrat Dam Wapikopa Fort Albany Lake ¸ Kingfisher Lake Webequie (Part) 67 ¸ ¸ La¸ ke 1 Kingfisher Wunnummin Winisk Lake Sandy¸ Lake 88 Weagamow Lake Nibinamik Lake ¸ Lake !P Fort Albany La¸ ke 87 Wunnumin 1 Fort Albany ¸ !P Kee-Way-Win Su¸ mmer Beaver (Part) 67 Sandy Lake Sandy Lake North Caribou Mameigwess Lake Lake Weagamow De¸ er Lake Lake North Spirit Deer La¸ ke Lake ¸ Attawapiskat Lake ONTARIO North Spirit Factory Lake Kabania Neskantaga Lake Island 1 r e v !P Moosonee i ·! R y n a MacDowell Marten lb McInnis A Lake Lake Fa¸ lls 65 Stout Po¸ plar Hill Lake Fo¸ rt Hope 64 Eabamet Ca¸ t Lake 63C Lake Cat Lake Pickle Lake ! r e Kesagami iv R Lake i ib ¸ a Osnaburgh 63B in s is M Slate F¸ alls Bamaji Lake ¸ Ogoki Lake Lake St.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Report Draft
    SAUGEEN FIRST NATION COMMUNITY ENERGY PLAN FINAL REPORT DRAFT NOVEMBER 6, 2017 4 Beechwood Crescent, Toronto, ON, M4K 2KB Telephone: 647-479-4104 FINAL REPORT DRAFT Saugeen First Nation November 6, 2017 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Brad Ritchie Economic Development Manager Melissa Snowdon Project Coordinator for the community Victoria Serda Josh Mitchell (former Housing Director) Darlene Root Finance department – Ningwakwe Shirley John 60 members who participated in the community survey 8 members who participated in the walkthroughs Band employees who participated in the walkthroughs of the band buildings Youth Council Elder’s Council All those who attended the community meetings, and those who shared with us in person. 2 4 Beechwood Crescent, Toronto, ON, M4K 2KB Telephone: 647-479-4104 FINAL REPORT DRAFT Saugeen First Nation November 6, 2017 Table of Contents ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS .................................................................................................................... 2 Executive Summary ................................................................................................................ 5 1.0 WHAT IS A COMMUNITY ENERGY PLAN? ..................................................................... 6 1.1 THE IESO ABORIGINAL COMMUNITY ENERGY PLAN PROGRAM ............................................ 6 2.0 SAUGEEN FIRST NATION .............................................................................................. 7 2.1 COMMUNITY PROFILE ........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Bruce County Council Agenda
    Bruce County Council Agenda Date: February 7, 2019 Time: 9:30 a.m. Location: Council Chambers County Administration Centre, Walkerton Chair: Mitch Twolan, Warden 1. Call to Order 2. Declaration of Pecuniary Interest 3. Confirmation of Council Minutes January 3, 2019 4. Communications Please contact the Clerk if you wish a copy of any of the communications listed. a. Municipality of Mattice-Valcote Resolution Re: Oath of Office b. City of Niagara Falls - Re: Resolution Opting in to Allow Retail Cannabis Stores c. Town of Orangeville Resolution opposing planned changes to the Planning Act in the proposed Bill 66 that may allow for an "open for business" planning by-law d. Correspondence from Mr. Keith Stelling Re: 254 High Street, Southampton e. Correspondence from Mr. Peter Storck RE: 254 High Street, Southampton f. Board of Health for the Grey Bruce Health Unit Announcing the appointment of Dr. Ian Arra to the position of Medical Officer of Health g. Grey Bruce Health Unit Approach to Cannabis h. Correspondence from David and Sheila Latham Re: 254 High Street, Southampton i. AMO President Re: Joint and Several Liability Review j. Correspondence from Ms. Jill Taylor Re: 254 High Street, Southampton 5. Delegations a. Ms. Jill Taylor RE: Bruce County Museum and 254 High Street in Southampton 6. Reports from Staff a. June 2019 Council and Committee Meeting Date Change 7. Inquiries and Announcements 8. Minutes January 3, 2019 ● Corporate Services Committee ● Executive Committee ● Human Resources Committee ● Human Services Committee ● Museum Committee January 10, 2019 ● Corporate Services Committee Page 2 of 245 ● Executive Committee January 11, 2019 ● Corporate Services Committee January 17, 2019 ● Executive Committee ● Human Services Committee ● Planning and Development Committee ● Transportation & Environmental Services Committee January 24, 2019 ● Corporate Services Committee 9.
    [Show full text]
  • OPG's Deep Geologic Repository Project Communications and Consultation Report
    OPG’s Deep Geologic Repository Project Communications and Consultation Report: Community Open HousesSAFE, RESPONSIBLE MANAGEMENT OF NUCLEAR WASTE December 2008 NATURAL BARRIERS TO PROVIDE LONG TERM MANAGEMENT TO SAFELY ISOLATE LOW & INTERMEDIATE LEVEL WASTE Prepared by: AECOM Canada Ltd. KEEPING YOU INFORMED Date: DecemberWELCOME 2008 ABOUT THE DEEP GEOLOGIC REPOSITORY PROJECT OPG’s Deep Geologic Repository Project Communications & Consultation Report: Community Open Houses November 2008 Prepared for Ontario Power Generation (OPG) December 2008 Reference: 60743 Distribution: • Ontario Power Generation • AECOM Canada Ltd. Table of Contents Page 1. Introduction ................................................................................................... 1 OPG’s Deep Geologic 2. Community Open House Topics .................................................................. 2 Repository Project 3. Notification .................................................................................................... 3 4. Dates and Venues ......................................................................................... 4 Communications & 5. Number of Participants ................................................................................ 5 Consultation Report: 6. Community Open House Format ................................................................. 6 Community Open Houses 7. Opportunities for Input................................................................................. 9 November 2008 8. Key Areas of Discussion ...........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Bruce Grey Huron Perth Elgin Middlesex Oxford-Norfolk
    South West Local Health Integration Network Legend Tobermory Ü Ü Cities/Towns NORTHERN BRUCE PENINSULA First Nations X Local Health Integration Network office location u" Hospitals Major Highway Highway Lions Head Sub-LHIN boundaries u" Census Subdivisions South West LHIN boundary NEYAASHIINIGMIING 27 0 12.5 25 50 KM Pike Bay Ü Last Updated: 8/29/2014 SOUTH BRUCE PENINSULA Ü Big Bay North Simcoe Muskoka OliphantÜ u"Ü Chippewas of Nawash Unceded First Nation Ü Wiarton Kemble Ü Ü Sauble Falls Clavering Ü LindenwoodHogg Ü Sauble Beach North Ü GEORGIAN BLUFFS Sauble Beach Ü East Linton Ü Ü Ü Balmy Beach Leith Ü Ü Park Head Annan Meafor"d Ü Saugeen First Nation OWEN SOUND u Springmount Ü " SAUGEEN 29 Ü u Ü Jackson MEAFORD Ü Allenford Ü Ü Alvanley Rockford Clarksburg Elsinore Ü Ü Kilsyth Ü Bognor u" Southampton Walters Falls Ü Keady Ü THE BLUE MOUNTAINS Port Elgin Ü SAUGEEN SHORES Grimston Ü G rr e y ARRAN-ELDERSLIE Holland Centre CHATSWORTH Ü Berkeley Ü Mooresburg Ü Chesley Markdale B r u c e Ü Ü B r u c e Inverhuron u" Scone u" GREY HIGHLANDS Ü Kinhuron KINCARDINE WEST GREY Ü Ü Irish Lake Ü Ü Elmwood Slade Ceylon Ü Huron Ridge Ü Ü" u Cargill Ü Kincardine Priceville Ü Allan Park Millarton Ü Ü Durha"m BROCKTON u Ü HANOVER Ü Bervie Walkerton Ü " Pine River " u Ü u Lurgan Beach Carlsruhe Ü Ü Point Clark Ü Ripley HURON-KINLOSS Ayton Ü SOUTH BRUCE Central Belmore Ü Central West Ü HOWICK ASHFIELD-COLBORNE-WAWANOSH u"Wingham Ü Ü Wroxeter Fordwich Nile Ü NORTH HURON MORRIS-TURNBERRY Ü Carlow Ü Kurtzville Ü Ü Molesworth " Saltford Gowanstown Ü GODuERICH Ü EthelÜ Listoweu"l H u rr o n NORTH PERTH Waterloo Wellington CENTRAL HURON Ü Holmesville Ü Atwood Ü Clintou"n DonegalÜ Toronto Central HURON EAST Monkton Ü Newton Ü Harpurhey Ü Ü Seaforth Ü Brodhagen Ü Ü " Millbank Egmondville u Ü Bornholm Poole Ü BrunnerÜ Mississauga Halton Rostock Ü Ü BLUEWATER WEST PERTH PERTH EAST MitchelWl artburg Ü Gads Hill Ü Amulree Ü P e rr tt h Sebringville Ü Ü SOUTH HURON Ü Dashwood Ü STRu"ATFORD Exeteu"r Shakespeare Woodham Ü Ü Huron Park Ü St.
    [Show full text]
  • Food Is My Medicine-Climate Change FN.Pdf
    “My Food is My Medicine, My Medicine is My Food” First Nations and Metis People of Grey and Bruce: a forage into traditional food use, climate change and health. Grey Bruce Health Unit Acknowledgements This report was prepared for the Grey Bruce Health Unit by Krista Youngblood, Master of Public Health Graduate Student, University of Waterloo, Ontario, Canada. The practicum placement was supported by a grant from the Canadian Institute of Health Research. The views expressed in this report are those of the Author and not necessarily represent those of the Grey Bruce Health Unit, the University of Waterloo or the Canadian Institute of Health Research. This project developed under the guidance of Alanna Leffley, Sr. Epidemiologist at the Grey Bruce Health Unit. Alanna was a valuable sounding board and provided thoughtful criticism that assisted my work greatly. Instrumental to this investigation were the people who were willing to share their stories with me. I thank you all, and look forward to seeing you again as I truly hope our paths will cross again. I have learned a great deal about the First People of this land, and the Metis Nation that was born from the merging of two worlds. I simply cannot express the gratitude I feel for the opportunity to learn so much and for feeling so welcome in your midst. Thank you to everyone who shared your stories with me. I simply do not have the words to express my gratitude and how much it meant to me personally. A special thank you to Victoria Serda, Lori Kewaquom, Lenore Keshig, Mary Miller, Michelle Desjardine, and Dee Miller for assisting me so willingly in this endeavor.
    [Show full text]
  • Disunity and Dispossession: Nawash Ojibwa and Potawatomi in the Saugeen Territory, 1836-1865
    University of Calgary PRISM: University of Calgary's Digital Repository Graduate Studies Legacy Theses 1997 Disunity and dispossession: Nawash Ojibwa and Potawatomi in the Saugeen Territory, 1836-1865 McMullen, Stephanie McMullen, S. (1997). Disunity and dispossession: Nawash Ojibwa and Potawatomi in the Saugeen Territory, 1836-1865 (Unpublished master's thesis). University of Calgary, Calgary, AB. doi:10.11575/PRISM/16532 http://hdl.handle.net/1880/26741 master thesis University of Calgary graduate students retain copyright ownership and moral rights for their thesis. You may use this material in any way that is permitted by the Copyright Act or through licensing that has been assigned to the document. For uses that are not allowable under copyright legislation or licensing, you are required to seek permission. Downloaded from PRISM: https://prism.ucalgary.ca THE UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY DiSunity and Dispossession: Nawash Ojibwa and Potawatomi in the Saugeen Territory, 1836-1865 by Stephanie McMden A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES IN PARTIAL FULFILMENT OF THE REQWIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS DEPARTMENT OF HISTORY CALGARY, ALBERTA JLME, 1997 @ Stephanie McMullen 1997 National Library Biblbthéque nationale 191 ofCanada du Canada Acquisitions and Acquisitions et Bibliographie Services services bibliographiques 395 Wellington Street 395. nie Wellington OttawaON KiA ON4 ûttawa ON KIA ON4 Canada Canada The author has granted a non- L'auteur a accordé une licence non exclusive licence allowing the exclusive permettant a la National Library of Canada to Bibliothéque nationale du Canada de reproduce, loan, distribute or selI reproduire, prêter, distribuer ou copies of this thesis ui microfonn, vendre des copies de cette thèse sous paper or electronic formats.
    [Show full text]
  • Paramedic Services 2019 Business Plan Q3 Update.Docx
    2019 Bruce County Business Plan Department: Paramedic Services Strategic Priorities: 1. Find creative ways to engage our public. Make the county fully accessible to people through access to information. Engage in cross- departmental streamlining – specialize in the solution, not the department. 2. Explore alternate options to improve efficiency and service. Develop a system for measuring our processes and their successful desired outcome. Look for economy of scale or shared services among our departments and our communities. Coordinate working with other agencies. 3. Develop Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) that are meaningful and report on them. Set measurable goals and evaluate against them. Build in accountability and evaluation mechanisms. 4. Eliminate our own red tape. Focus on the internal and the external customer / client needs first and eliminate all duplications of services and data. 2019 Bruce County Business Plan - Key Performance Indicators: 2015 2016 2017 2018 2018 2019 2019 Indicator Actual Actual Actual Actual Budget Q3 Budget Total paramedic responses per 1,000 population 97 98 102 103 100 80 104 Average length of time from crew notification to P 13:25 P 13:45 P 13:31 P: 13:26 P 13:35 P: 14:00 P 13:35 arrival for Code 3 and 4 calls. L 9:28 L 9:48 L 9:28 L: 9:40 L 9:30 L: 10:00 L 9:30 I 9:07 I 8:46 I 8:37 I: 9:20 I 8:30 I: 9:28 I 8:30 C 10:47 C10:40 C 10:25 C: 10:36 C 10:30 C: 10:57 C 10:30 Length of time from crew notification to arrival for P 24:41 P 24:23 P: 25:20 P: 24:37 P: 24:30 P: 25:54 P 24:30 the highest priority calls – 90th percentile.
    [Show full text]
  • Formal Document Starter Template
    REPORT, GENERAL INDIGENOUS ENGAGEMENT REPORT DOUGLAS POINT WASTE FACILITY 22-513130-REPT-001 Revision 2 Prepared by: 2020/10/13 Margot Thompson Date Communications Specialist Reviewed by: 2020/10/15 Julie Therrien Date Manager, Operations, Douglas Point Decommissioning Approved by: 2020/10/15 Mitch MacKay Date Manager, Stakeholder Relations, Environmental Remediation Management Effective date: 2020/10/15 UNRESTRICTED © Canadian Nuclear Laboratories REPORT, GENERAL UNRESTRICTED INDIGENOUS ENGAGEMENT REPORT 22-513130-REPT-001 REV. 2 REVISION HISTORY Rev. Date Details of Rev. Prepared Reviewed By Approved By No. By 1 2020/04/13 Issued as “Approved for Use” Margot Ian Bainbridge Mitch MacKay Thompson 1D1 2020/01/13 Issued for “Review and Comment” Margot Ian Bainbridge Mitch MacKay Thompson Mitch MacKay 0 2019/11/21 Issued as “Approved for Use” Margot Ian Bainbridge Mitch MacKay Thompson D1 2019/11/06 Issued for “Review and Comment” Margot Ian Bainbridge Mitch MacKay Thompson Mitch MacKay 1 2020/04/13 Issued as “Approved for Use” Margot Ian Bainbridge Mitch Mackay Thompson 2D1 2020/10/13 Issued for “Review and Comment” Margot Mitch MacKay Mitch MacKay Thompson 2 2020/10/15 Issued as “Approved for Use” Margot Julie Therrien Mitch Mackay Thompson REPORT, GENERAL UNRESTRICTED INDIGENOUS ENGAGEMENT REPORT 22-513130-REPT-001 REV. 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION PAGE 1. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................... 5 1.1 Purpose ..................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]