Enterprise and Culture Committee

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Enterprise and Culture Committee ENTERPRISE AND CULTURE COMMITTEE Tuesday 7 November 2006 Session 2 £5.00 Parliamentary copyright. Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body 2006. Applications for reproduction should be made in writing to the Licensing Division, Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, St Clements House, 2-16 Colegate, Norwich NR3 1BQ Fax 01603 723000, which is administering the copyright on behalf of the Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body. Produced and published in Scotland on behalf of the Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body by Astron. CONTENTS Tuesday 7 November 2006 Col. INTERESTS ......................................................................................................................................... 3435 BANKRUPTCY AND DILIGENCE ETC (SCOTLAND) BILL: STAGE 2.................................................................. 3436 ST ANDREW’S DAY BANK HOLIDAY (SCOTLAND) BILL .............................................................................. 3448 ST ANDREW’S DAY BANK HOLIDAY (SCOTLAND) BILL: STAGE 2 ................................................................ 3451 BUDGET PROCESS 2007-08.................................................................................................................. 3452 BUSINESS IN THE PARLIAMENT CONFERENCE 2006 .................................................................................. 3458 ENTERPRISE AND CULTURE COMMITTEE 26th Meeting 2006, Session 2 CONVENER *Alex Neil (Central Scotland) (SNP) DEPU TY CONVENER *Christine May (Central Fife) (Lab) COMMI TTEE MEMBERS *Shiona Baird (North East Scotland) (Green) *Richard Baker (North East Scotland) (Lab) Susan Deacon (Edinburgh East and Musselburgh) (Lab) *Murdo Fraser (Mid Scotland and Fife) (Con) *Karen Gillon (Clydesdale) (Lab) *Mr Stew art Maxw ell (West of Scotland) (SNP) *Mr Jamie Stone (Caithness, Sutherland and Easter Ross) (LD) COMMI TTEE SUBSTITU TES Mark Ballard (Lothians) (Green) Donald Gorrie (Central Scotland) (LD) Fiona Hyslop (Lothians) (SNP) Margaret Jamieson (Kilmarnock and Loudoun) (Lab) Dav id McLetchie (Edinburgh Pentlands) (Con) *attended THE FOLLOWING ALSO ATTENDED : Dennis Canavan (Falkirk West) (Ind) Tom McCabe (Minister for Finance and Public Service Reform) Allan Wilson (Deputy Minister for Enterprise and Lifelong Learning) CLERK TO THE COMMITTE E Stephen Imrie SENIOR ASSISTANT CLERK Douglas Thornton ASSISTANT CLERK Nick Haw thorne LOC ATION Committee Room 4 3435 7 NOVEMBER 2006 3436 Scottish Parliament Bankruptcy and Diligence etc (Scotland) Bill: Stage 2 Enterprise and Culture Committee 14:02 Tuesday 7 November 2006 The Convener: The second item on the agenda is what should be the final session of our stage 2 consideration of the Bankruptcy and Diligence etc [THE CONVENER opened the meeting at 14:01] (Scotland) Bill. I welcome to the meeting the Deputy Minister for Enterprise and Lifelong Interests Learning, Allan Wilson, and his team. We will go through the amendments as set out in the The Convener (Alex Neil): As it is now 1 marshalled list. minute past 2, I welcome everyone to the 26th meeting in 2006 of the Enterprise and Culture Section 193 agreed to. Committee and ask you all to switch off your mobile phones. We have received no apologies. Section 194—Abolition of sequestration for rent and restriction of landlord’s hypothec Item 1 is a declaration of interests. I welcome to the committee Stewart Maxwell, who replaces The Convener: Amendment 487, in the name of Michael Matheson. At this point, I should, on the the minister, is grouped with amendments 488 to committee’s behalf, pay tribute to Michael’s 491. valuable contribution to the committee’s work. The Deputy Minister for Enterprise and I ask Mr Maxwell to declare any interests. Lifelong Learning (Allan Wilson): The bill abolishes the common law diligence of Mr Stewart Maxwell (West of Scotland) (SNP): sequestration for rent. Such a diligence has Thank you for that welcome, convener. Although I nothing to do with bankruptcy. Indeed, it works in have no relevant interests to declare, I point much the same way as the old diligence of members to my declaration in the register of poinding, except that, in practice, it is much worse members’ interests. than poinding ever was. It is used by landlords to The Convener: I should also tell the committee recover unpaid rent by selling certain types of that one of our advisers from the Scottish goods kept in leased property. Parliament information centre, Stephen Herbert, Sequestration for rent allows landlords to get has been recovering from a serious stabbing into property without giving notice to tenants; to incident that happened while he was overseas for sell the goods that they find there, even if they a football match. I am sure that every member of belong to someone other than the tenant; and to the committee sends their best wishes to Stephen, have tenants ordered to refurnish the property so who is a very valued contributor to the committee’s that the whole process can start again. Such a work. mechanism has no part to play in a modern enforcement system, not least because a landlord is able to use other diligences to recover unpaid rent, such as attachment, which we have discussed at length. Sequestration for rent can be used to sell only goods that are secured by a right known as the landlord’s hypothec, which arises automatically whenever there is a qualifying lease. The bill makes some changes to the hypothec, even though it is not a diligence. For example, it completes the process of abolishing the hypothec over goods in dwelling-houses that was initiated by the Debt Arrangement and Attachment (Scotland) Act 2002. It also abolishes the hypothec over goods owned by a third party. The amendments in the group are intended to clarify the effect of abolishing sequestration for rent and restricting the application of the hypothec. Amendment 487 clarifies that the bill does not create any new preference for the landlord when 3437 7 NOVEMBER 2006 3438 competing claims are ranked, and has the effect of will need to be resolved if the principle of having giving landlords preference only in a bankruptcy or debt relief in the DAS is agreed. Amendment 492 a similar process that follows from the fact that the seeks to give the Scottish ministers a new power hypothec continues as a security. to provide for debt relief, which will supplement the existing regulation-making power in section 7 of Amendments 488 and 489 clarify the effect of the 2002 act. the transitional arrangements in sections 194(10) and 194(11) that are needed as a result of the Debt relief raises important issues, not least of changes made by the bill. Amendment 490 makes which is the impact on creditors’ rights, and the a small change that is needed to reflect the fact committee rightly has an interest in the detail of that the hypothec is not created by the parties to a what the Executive would do with this power. As a lease but arises by operation of law. Finally, result, amendment 492 provides for the use of the amendment 491 clarifies that the hypothec does power to be subject to affirmative procedure. If the not arise over any part of a dwelling-house, amendment is agreed to, I plan to use the new including a garage or any outbuildings. power and to come back to the committee next year to ask it to approve regulations that will I move amendment 487. enable interest and charges to be frozen. Amendment 487 agreed to. If the freezing of interest is successful—as I Amendments 488 to 491 moved—[Allan believe it will be—I will consider using the power to Wilson]—and agreed to. cancel debt. Any such move will need careful consideration, as one of the major advantages of Section 194, as amended, agreed to. the DAS for debtors is that they can keep their Section 195 agreed to. homes and other assets. Indeed, we have discussed that matter at length. I will therefore Before section 196 continue to work with stakeholders to ensure that the DAS is an effective debt tool. The Convener: Amendment 492, in the name of the minister, is grouped with amendment 493. Amendment 493 makes a minor change to section 196 that will be needed if amendment 492 Allan Wilson: The debt arrangement scheme is is agreed to and a new section is inserted before a groundbreaking new debt tool that was created section 196. As that new section will make the first by the Debt Arrangement and Attachment amendment to the 2002 act, section 196 should be (Scotland) Act 2002. At the moment, the Executive read as making further amendments to that act. supports 80 DAS-approved money advisers, who cover most of Scotland and help 190 people to I move amendment 492. manage debts amounting to £2,867,000. Christine May (Central Fife) (Lab): I am sure As we know that the DAS can work, I want to go that the committee welcomes these amendments. further and make it even better. One way to do After all, we recommended the same measures in that—and one way to address one of the money our stage 1 report and were particularly anxious advisers’ main concerns about the scheme—is to that the Executive should implement them. stipulate that the debts in a debt payment However, subsection (3) of the proposed new programme do not need to be paid in full. At section states: present, during a programme, creditors can apply “The Scottish Ministers may, by regulations, make such interest and charges to the debt. However, the further provision as they think fit”. debtor’s payments may not be enough to cover accrued interest and charges, which means that The word “may” expresses doubt—something may they can complete a programme and still be in happen only if somebody has the will to do it. Will debt. As that makes no sense, there is a strong you reassure us that regulations will, rather than argument for freezing interest when a programme may, be made? is approved. The Convener: We will need to refer the bill as We could go further and cancel part of the debt. amended to the Subordinate Legislation For example, someone with a debt of £10,000 who Committee, because a new power to make pays £150 a month over five years will repay a subordinate legislation is involved.
Recommended publications
  • Enterprise and Culture Committee
    ENTERPRISE AND CULTURE COMMITTEE Tuesday 29 November 2005 Session 2 £5.00 Parliamentary copyright. Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body 2005. Applications for reproduction should be made in writing to the Licensing Division, Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, St Clements House, 2-16 Colegate, Norwich NR3 1BQ Fax 01603 723000, which is administering the copyright on behalf of the Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body. Produced and published in Scotland on behalf of the Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body by Astron. CONTENTS Tuesday 29 November 2005 Col. ITEM IN PRIVATE .................................................................................................................................. 2467 SUBORDINATE LEGISLATION.................................................................................................................. 2468 Fundable Bodies (Scotland) Order (draft) ......................................................................................... 2468 BBC (I NTERNAL REVIEWS) ................................................................................................................... 2471 PUBLIC SERVICE BROADCASTING (OFFICE OF COMMUNICATIONS REVIEW)................................................... 2494 ENERGY POLICY .................................................................................................................................. 2513 ENTERPRISE AND CULTURE COMMITTEE 25th Meeting 2005, Session 2 CONVENER *Alex Neil (Central Scotland) (SNP) DEPU TY CONVENER *Christine May (Central Fife) (Lab)
    [Show full text]
  • Scottish Parliament Elections: 1 May 2003 14.05.03
    RESEARCH PAPER 03/46 Scottish Parliament 14 MAY 2003 Elections: 1 May 2003 This paper provides summary and detailed results of the second elections to the Scottish Parliament which took place on 1 May 2003. The paper provides data on voting trends and electoral turnout for constituencies, electoral regions and for Scotland as a whole. This paper is a companion volume to Library Research Papers 03/45 Welsh Assembly Elections and 03/44 Local Elections 2003. Matthew Leeke & Richard Cracknell SOCIAL & GENERAL STATISTICS SECTION HOUSE OF COMMONS LIBRARY Recent Library Research Papers 03/32 Parliamentary Questions, Debate Contributions and Participation in 31.03.03 Commons Divisions 03/33 Economic Indicators [includes article: Changes to National Insurance 01.04.03 Contributions, April 2003] 03/34 The Anti-Social Behaviour Bill [Bill 83 of 2002-03] 04.04.03 03/35 Direct taxes: rates and allowances 2003-04-11 10.04.03 03/36 Unemployment by Constituency, March 2003 17.04.03 03/37 Economic Indicators [includes article: The current WTO trade round] 01.05.03 03/38 NHS Foundation Trusts in the Health and Social Care 01.05.03 (Community Health and Standards) Bill [Bill 70 of 2002-03] 03/39 Social Care Aspects of the Health and Social Care (Community Health 02.05.03 and Standards Bill) [Bill 70 of 2002-03] 03/40 Social Indicators 06.05.03 03/41 The Health and Social Care (Community Health and Standards) 06.05.03 Bill: Health aspects other than NHS Foundation Trusts [Bill 70 of 2002-03] 03/42 The Fire Services Bill [Bill 81 of 2002-03] 07.05.03 03/43
    [Show full text]
  • 2007 Manifesto a Manifesto for Green Government
    2007 Manifesto A Manifesto for Green Government > Act Now: Choose a Green Future www.scottishgreens.org.uk Table of Contents Foreword 1 Prevention better than cure 10 Section 4: Transport: moving Scotland Achievements 2003–2007 2 Public and community health 10 in the right direction 18 Pledges 2007–2011 2 NHS Reform 11 Road safety and social exclusion 18 Carers and caring 11 Walking 18 Section 1: An economy for Mental health 11 Cycling 19 people and planet 3 Sexual health 11 Buses and trams 19 Sustainable communities 3 Complementary and alternative Affordable, reliable rail services 19 Supporting local business 4 medicine 11 Freight and ferries 19 Businesses for good 4 Drugs, alcohol and tobacco 11 Roads 20 Measuring what matters 4 Children, young people and families 12 Air travel 20 Fair, clear and Green taxation 4 Pensioners 12 Poverty 4 Sport and green spaces 12 Section 5: A healthy and productive Public services in the public interest 5 The arts 12 natural environment 21 > A revolution in the food economy 5 Crime 13 Reconnecting people with the land 21 Tackling waste 6 Justice for young people 13 Farming 21 Green jobs – fair jobs 6 Liberty 14 Treating nature and wildlife Strengthening rural livelihoods 7 Equality and diversity 14 with respect 22 A sustainable tourism industry 7 Protecting the marine environment 22 Science and technology 7 Section 3: Stopping the Supertanker: Supporting sustainable fisheries 22 Energy and Climate Change 15 Ending animal cruelty 23 Section 2: Healthy communities Energy policy 15 and a good quality of
    [Show full text]
  • People, Planet, Peace Scottish Green Party Westminster Election Manifesto 2005 People, Planet, Peace
    People, Planet, Peace Scottish Green Party Westminster Election Manifesto 2005 People, Planet, Peace Shiona Baird MSP Co-Convenor of the Scottish Green Party I am proud to introduce the Scottish We spell out progressive Green Party manifesto for the solutions to promote Westminster election 2005: peace and co-operation in the world instead of a – a manifesto in the interests of people, climate of fear and paranoia. We set out not the profits of big business at any cost; a programme to help reduce global – a manifesto for the planet, offering real conflict and tackle poverty. action on climate change; Action on climate change forms a – a manifesto for peace and global justice. centrepiece of this manifesto. Because of the unsustainable actions of those who People want fresh, honest politics, an have been in power for generations, our optimistic vision of the future and the economy and communities face real practical steps to bring it about. Only the climate threats and future energy crises. Greens offer an alternative to the dinosaur politics of the other parties. We are standing in every region of Scotland, in five times as many seats as We’re about real quality of life. We we did in the last Westminster election. campaign for real progress and a fairer, This gives more people the chance to vote just society; for a safe environment and with their hearts and minds – not with for peace not war; for healthy, strong despair and lack of choice. communities. We stand up for people and the public interest, not private profit We are the only party that will implement above all else.
    [Show full text]
  • Towards a More Complex Language Identity? an Investigation of Opinions on Scots in a Sample of Policy Makers and Others∗
    Atina L.K. Nihtinen Towards a more complex language identity? An investigation of opinions on Scots in a sample of policy makers and others∗ Background to this survey In a recent study on language policy in Britain and Ireland in a book called “Multilingual Europe” (Battarbee 2005, 131–146), it is argued that the definition and status of Scots are still considered to be controversial in spite of recognition by the European Bureau for Lesser-Used Languages (EBLUL)1, the Scottish parliament and at a UK government level. Battarbee (2005, 140) points out that virtually nothing has been done to enhance the status of Scots apart from some cosmetic2 use in the Scottish Parliament. It has been stated several times that whether Scots is seen as a language or a dialect (or dialects for that matter) is dependent on a political point of view. Defining present-day Scots as a language has been difficult for both linguistic and historical reasons (See e.g. Leith 1983, 164 and McArthur 1998). In any case, it was only after the Union of the Crowns (and, even more markedly, after the Union of Parliaments) that Scots gradually came to be regarded as a corrupt form of English and the language lost its status as a result of political events. Had the political situation been different, it can be argued that Scots would have been a national language through the centuries in a similar fashion to many national languages in Europe. On the other hand, contemporary Scots is “certainly distinct enough to be dealt with separately” (Dossena 2005a, 9) and a terminological distinction between Scots and Scottish Standard English “has to be drawn very clearly and explicitly to avoid confusion” (Dossena 2005a, 13).
    [Show full text]
  • Journal of Irish and Scottish Studies
    Journal of Irish and Scottish Studies Volume 4: Issue 2 The Spaces of the Nation: Strategic Spatial Planning in Scotland and the Island of Ireland AHRC Centre for Irish and Scottish Studies, University of Aberdeen JOURNAL OF IRISH AND SCOTTISH STUDIES Volume 4, Issue 2 Spring 2011 The Spaces of the Nation: Strategic Spatial Planning in Scotland and the Island of Ireland Published by the AHRC Centre for Irish and Scottish Studies at the University of Aberdeen in association with The universities of the The Irish-Scottish Academic Initiative ISSN 1753-2396 Printed and bound in Great Britain by CPI Antony Rowe, Chippenham and Eastbourne Journal of Irish and Scottish Studies General Editor: Cairns Craig Issue Editor: William J.V. Neill Associate Editor: Michael Brown Editorial Advisory Board: Fran Brearton, Queen’s University, Belfast Eleanor Bell, University of Strathclyde Ewen Cameron, University of Edinburgh Sean Connolly, Queen’s University, Belfast Patrick Crotty, University of Aberdeen David Dickson, Trinity College, Dublin T. M. Devine, University of Edinburgh David Dumville, University of Aberdeen Aaron Kelly, University of Edinburgh Edna Longley, Queen’s University, Belfast Peter Mackay, Queen’s University, Belfast Shane Alcobia-Murphy, University of Aberdeen Ian Campbell Ross, Trinity College, Dublin Graham Walker, Queen’s University, Belfast International Advisory Board: Don Akenson, Queen’s University, Kingston Tom Brooking, University of Otago Keith Dixon, Université Lumière Lyon 2 Luke Gibbons, Notre Dame Marjorie Howes, Boston College H. Gustav Klaus, University of Rostock Peter Kuch, University of Otago Graeme Morton, University of Guelph Brad Patterson, Victoria University, Wellington Matthew Wickman, Brigham Young David Wilson, University of Toronto The Journal of Irish and Scottish Studies is a peer reviewed journal published twice yearly in autumn and spring by the AHRC Centre for Irish and Scottish Studies at the University of Aberdeen.
    [Show full text]
  • Official Report to Be Forwarded to Them Should Give Notice at the Document Supply Centre
    ENTERPRISE AND CULTURE COMMITTEE Tuesday 22 November 2005 Session 2 £5.00 Parliamentary copyright. Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body 2005. Applications for reproduction should be made in writing to the Licensing Division, Her Majesty‟s Stationery Office, St Clements House, 2-16 Colegate, Norwich NR3 1BQ Fax 01603 723000, which is administering the copyright on behalf of the Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body. Produced and published in Scotland on behalf of the Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body by Astron. CONTENTS Tuesday 22 November 2005 Col. ITEMS IN PRIVATE ................................................................................................................................ 2433 BUSINESS GROWTH INQUIRY ................................................................................................................. 2434 SUBORDINATE LEGISLATION.................................................................................................................. 2463 Glasgow School of Art (Scotland) Amendment Order of Council 2005 (SSI 2005/525) ......................... 2463 Education (Graduate Endowment, Student Fees and Support) (Scotland) Amendment (No 2) Regulations 2005 (SSI 2005/545).................................................................................................. 2463 Electricity from Non-Fossil Fuel Sources (Scotland) Saving Arrangements Order 2005 (SSI 2005/549) 2464 BUSINESS IN THE PARLIAMENT .............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Spice Briefing
    LIST OF ALL MSPS A-Z: SESSION 2 Scottish Parliament The Fact sheet provides an alphabetical list of all Members of the Scottish Parliament (MSPs) who served during the second Fact sheet parliamentary session, 7 May 2003 – 2 April 2007. It also lists the party for which each MSP was elected as well as the constituency or region that they represented. MSPs: Historical The abbreviation (C) has been used to indicate a constituency seat Series and (R) to indicate a regional seat. 12 March 2009 1 MSP Party Constituency or Region Brian Adam Scottish National Party Aberdeen North (C) Bill Aitken Conservative Glasgow (R) Wendy Alexander Labour Paisley North (C) Andrew Arbuckle1 Liberal Democrat Mid Scotland and Fife (R) Jackie Baillie Labour Dumbarton (C) Shiona Baird Green North East Scotland (R) Richard Baker Labour North East Scotland (R) Chris Ballance Green South of Scotland (R) Mark Ballard Green Lothians (R) Scott Barrie Labour Dunfermline West (C) Sarah Boyack Labour Edinburgh Central (C) Rhona Brankin Labour Midlothian (C) Ted Brocklebank Conservative Mid Scotland and Fife (R) Robert Brown Liberal Democrat Glasgow (R) Derek Brownlee2 Conservative South of Scotland (R) Bill Butler Labour Glasgow Anniesland (C) Rosemary Byrne3 Scottish Socialist Party South of Scotland (R) Dennis Canavan Independent Falkirk West (C) Malcolm Chisholm Labour Edinburgh North and Leith (C) Cathie Craigie Labour Cumbernauld and Kilsyth (C) Bruce Crawford Scottish National Party Mid Scotland and Fife (R) Roseanna Cunningham Scottish National Party Perth (C) Frances Curran Scottish Socialist Party West of Scotland (R) Margaret Curran Labour Glasgow Baillieston (C) David Davidson Conservative North East Scotland (R) Susan Deacon Labour Edinburgh East and Mussleburgh (C) James Douglas-Hamilton Conservative Lothians (R) Helen Eadie Labour Dunfermline East (C) Fergus Ewing Scottish National Party Inverness East, Nairn and Lochaber (C) 1 Andrew Arbuckle became the regional member for Mid Scotland and Fife on 10 January 2005.
    [Show full text]
  • The Scottish Green Party
    People, Planet, Peace Scottish Green Party Westminster Election Manifesto 2005 People, Planet, Peace Shiona Baird MSP Co-Convenor of the Scottish Green Party I am proud to introduce the Scottish We spell out progressive Green Party manifesto for the solutions to promote Westminster election 2005: peace and co-operation in the world instead of a – a manifesto in the interests of people, climate of fear and paranoia. We set out not the profits of big business at any cost; a programme to help reduce global – a manifesto for the planet, offering real conflict and tackle poverty. action on climate change; Action on climate change forms a – a manifesto for peace and global justice. centrepiece of this manifesto. Because of the unsustainable actions of those who People want fresh, honest politics, an have been in power for generations, our optimistic vision of the future and the economy and communities face real practical steps to bring it about. Only the climate threats and future energy crises. Greens offer an alternative to the dinosaur politics of the other parties. We are standing in every region of Scotland, in five times as many seats as We’re about real quality of life. We we did in the last Westminster election. campaign for real progress and a fairer, This gives more people the chance to vote just society; for a safe environment and with their hearts and minds – not with for peace not war; for healthy, strong despair and lack of choice. communities. We stand up for people and the public interest, not private profit We are the only party that will implement above all else.
    [Show full text]
  • Women and Parliaments in the UK
    Women and Parliaments in the UK Revised July 2011 by Catriona Burness © The support of the JRSST Charitable Trust in producing this Handbook is gratefully acknowledged. The JRSST Charitable Trust is endowed by The Joseph Rowntree Reform Trust Ltd. Front cover illustration Scottish Parliament Chamber Image © Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body – 2010 Sincere thanks to Brenda Graham for her help with proofreading and to Dr Françoise Barlet and to Kate Phillips for their comments on handbook drafts. Notes on the Author Dr Catriona Burness is an independent writer and consultant on politics. She has published many articles on the subject of women and politics and has worked at the universities of Dundee, Durham, Edinburgh, Glasgow, and St Andrews. She has held study fellowships in Finland, New Zealand and Sweden and worked at the European Parliament in Brussels for ten years. Catriona Burness asserts her moral right to be identified as the author of this book. The work is available on the basis that it may be used and circulated for non-commercial purposes and may not be adapted. ISBN: 978-0-9565140-3-5 Contents 4. Foreword 5. Introduction 6. House of Commons 9. Female Candidates and Elected MPs, October 1974-2010 10. Summary of Female MPs Elected 2010 11. Former Female Members of Parliament (MPs) 1918-2011 17. Current Female MPs, England 2011 21. Current Female MPs, Northern Ireland 2011 22. Current Female MPs, Scotland 2011 23. Current Female MPs, Wales 2011 24. National Assembly for Wales 27. Summary of Female Assembly Members (AMs) 1999-2011 28. Current Female Assembly Members (AMs) 2011 29.
    [Show full text]
  • First Minister's Questions on 9 October 2003
    MEETING OF THE PARLIAMENT Thursday 9 October 2003 Session 2 £5.00 Parliamentary copyright. Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body 2003. Applications for reproduction should be made in writing to the Licensing Division, Her Majesty‟s Stationery Office, St Clements House, 2-16 Colegate, Norwich NR3 1BQ Fax 01603 723000, which is administering the copyright on behalf of the Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body. Produced and published in Scotland on behalf of the Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body by The Stationery Office Ltd. Her Majesty‟s Stationery Office is independent of and separate from the company now trading as The Stationery Office Ltd, which is responsible for printing and publishing Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body publications. CONTENTS Thursday 9 October 2003 Debates Col. SCHOOLS (ENTERPRISE CULTURE) .................................................................................................................. 2479 Motion moved—[Mr Jim Wallace]. Amendment moved—[Jim Mather]. Amendment moved—[Murdo Fraser]. Amendment moved—[Shiona Baird]. The Deputy First Minister and Minister for Enterprise and Lifelong Learning (Mr Jim Wallace) ............... 2479 Jim Mather (Highlands and Islands) (SNP) ............................................................................................... 2485 Murdo Fraser (Mid Scotland and Fife) (Con) ............................................................................................. 2489 Shiona Baird (North East Scotland) (Green) ............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 2. the Scottish Parliament 25
    DEVOLUTION MONITORING PROGRAMME 2006-08 Scotland Devolution Monitoring Report January 2007 Peter Jones (ed.) Honorary Senior Research Fellow The Constitution Unit www.ucl.ac.uk/constitution-unit ISSN 1751-3855 The Devolution Monitoring Programme From 1999 to 2005 the Constitution Unit at University College London managed a major research project monitoring devolution across the UK through a network of research teams. 103 reports were produced during this project, which was funded by the Economic and Social Research Council (grant number L 219 252 016) and the Leverhulme Nations and Regions Programme. Now, with further funding from the Economic and social research council and support from several government departments, the monitoring programme is continuing for a further three years from 2006 until the end of 2008. Three times per year, the research network produces detailed reports covering developments in devolution in five areas: Scotland, Wales, Northern Ireland, the Englsh Regions, and Devolution and the Centre. The overall monitoring project is managed by Professor Robert Hazell and Akash Paun at the Constitution Unit, UCL and the team leaders are as follows: Scotland: Peter Jones Honorary Senior Research Fellow, The Constitution Unit, UCL Former political correspondent for The Economist Wales: Dr Richard Wyn Jones & Dr Roger Scully Institute of Welsh Politics, University of Wales, Aberystwyth Northern Ireland: Professor Rick Wilford & Robin Wilson Queen’s University, Belfast English Regions: Martin Burch & James Rees, IPEG, University of Manchester Alan Harding, SURF, University of Salford The Centre: Professor Robert Hazell, The Constitution Unit, UCL Akash Paun, The Constitution Unit, UCL The Constitution Unit and the rest of the research network is grateful to all the funders of the devolution monitoring programme.
    [Show full text]