DOCSLIB.ORG

Elements of Framing, Stereotyping and Ethnic Categorisation in the Greek Media Discourse During the 1976 Greek-Turkish Crisis

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Elements of Framing, Stereotyping and Ethnic Categorisation in the Greek Media Discourse During the 1976 Greek-Turkish Crisis SECTION: JOURNALISM LDMD I ELEMENTS OF FRAMING, STEREOTYPING AND ETHNIC CATEGORISATION IN THE GREEK MEDIA DISCOURSE DURING THE 1976 GREEK-TURKISH CRISIS Oana-Camelia STROESCU, Researcher, PhD, “Romanian Diplomatic Institute” Abstract: The present paper details the elements contributing to the development of ethnic categorisation in the Greek daily political newspapers during the Greek-Turkish crisis of the summer of 1976. After the Cyprus operations of 1974, Greece and Turkey have lived short periods of détente and expressions of mutual sympathy, followed by tension and diplomatic and/or military posturing. The two NATO allies came often on a brink of an armed conflict due to a variety of issues linked to different interpretation of international law regarding national sovereignty in certain areas of the Aegean Sea. These states should act as lighthouses of stability in the volatile region of Eastern Mediterranean and exclude any possibility of renewed hostilities in the future, including the armed confrontation. The study analyses the position of the Greek national political dailies on the Aegean energy crisis and shows the Greek media behaviour towards the Turkish people during the 1976 crisis. What kind of nationalism is reconstructed in the Greek press discourse? Is it a kind of patriotism or do news discourse reproduce sentiments of national superiority by using framing, ethnic categorisation, stereotypes and negative images? Do they contribute to the peace process between the two countries or do they exaggerate the conflict? Our purpose is to argue that the Greek daily political press produces and promotes ethnic categorisation through textual messages for the duration of the crisis. The front page articles of the major national Greek dailies contain textual messages that stereotype Turks by their concentration, frequency or omission. The methodology applied for this study is the qualitative analysis of the content of certain Greek national newspapers’ front pages during the Aegean crisis of 1976. This paper contains original as well as previously published ideas, fragments and/or language constructions of the author. Keywords: stereotype, Aegean crisis, press discourse, public opinion, ethnic categorisation There is an old stereotype about the Turks, illustrating them as bogeyman: ‘Eat your food, child, or else the Turk will come and take you away’. Sayings like this one can be found in the Balkan region and date back from the Ottoman Empire. But why Greeks have this negative image of their eastern neighbours? The present study has its source of inspiration in a wider research we are currently undergoing, related to the Greek-Turkish relations in the second half of the 20th century and the stereotypes promoted by the Greek media. In this paper we aim at remonstrating that the Greek press reinforces ethnic categorisation and stereotypes during this bilateral crisis, thus cultivating a negative image of the neighbour. The Alterity we refer to is the Turkish people as it is described by the Greek daily newspapers after the Cyprus crisis of 1974. One may observe the revival of the categorisation of the Turks in the Greek newspapers in times of bilateral tensions during the second half of the 20th century. The language has a strong impact on the collective perception of Alterity by creating simplified, negative images of the ‘other’. This perception is induced to public and perpetuates negative feelings towards the neighbours. The methodology applied for this study is the content analysis of the front page articles of major Greek political newspapers for a period of three months: one ahead of the crisis, during the crisis and one month after it. 129 SECTION: JOURNALISM LDMD I Greece and Turkey are two neighbouring states with wide coastlines at the Aegean Sea. The bilateral dispute is related to oil exploration and exploitation rights and thus to the sovereignty over certain areas in the Aegean. After World War II, the diplomatic relations between the two states passed through a crisis almost every ten years, because of the interethnic conflict in Cyprus and the disagreement regarding the sovereign right over some areas in the Aegean Sea. After 1974, this dispute took the shape of an energy dispute and referred to the disagreement over the interpretation and application of international law. On the one hand, Turkey’s position was that the Greek islands in the Eastern Aegean were not entitled to a continental shelf region and the delimitation line of the continental shelf should pass, from North to South, through the middle of the Aegean. The Turkish Government believed that the Aegean should be shared in equal parts between the two states, in order to have equal economic and defence opportunities in the area. On the other hand, Greece’s position was in favour of the delimitation of the continental shelf using the median line between the Greek islands in Eastern Aegean and the western shores of Turkey. In the summer of 1976, the tension took the shape of a crisis when the Turkish research vessel ‘Sismik I’ was sent out in the Aegean Sea to conduct oil research in the disputed continental shelf – considered by the authorities in Athens to be Greek. Consequently, Turkey and Greece appealed to the United Nation Security Council and to the International Court of Justice at The Hague and both international bodies had urged the neighbouring states not to make use of violence in solving the Aegean Sea issues and to continue with bilateral negotiations in order to achieve a solution in the best interest of both countries. The perspectives of Greece and Turkey always differ on the distribution of the blame for the tensions in the Aegean. Leaders’ references to a “just and lasting solution” rarely accommodate any understanding of what constitutes a fair outcome according to the other side. After a brief historical background on the Greek-Turkish relations, we need to make some remarks on identity, stereotypes, framing and ethnic categorisation. The social groups that shape the identity are characterized by membership criteria and boundaries; in short, they include some people and exclude others. Although it is not necessary for these boundaries to imply tension between groups, in practice relations between groups are far more likely to be “antagonistic than complementary” (Stephan, Ybarra & Rios Morrison, 2009, p. 43). And even when a threat from an outgroup leads to nonhostile behavioural reactions (e.g. compromise, negotiation and deterrence), the emotional responses to threat are likely to be negative. Threats occur in the ongoing relations between groups and their antecedents and consequences are interactive and recursive. That is, a group’s behaviour affects the perceptions and reactions of the other group. A stereotype can be defined as a person’s “knowledge, beliefs and expectancies about a social group” (Hamilton & Trolier, 1986, p. 133). It is known that, once formed, stereotypes or in other words certain beliefs, are applied to all members of the group, regardless the variation they may show in many respects. So stereotyping involves the overgeneralization of attributes to group members (Hamilton, Sherman, Crump & Spencer-Rodgers, 2009, p. 179). Framing often refers to the social construction of a social phenomenon by mass media, political leaders or other actors. It can be described as a process of selective influence over the individual's perception of the meanings attributed to words or phrases. In the context of mass media communication, a frame defines the packaging of an element of rhetoric in such a way as to encourage specific interpretations and to discourage others. Framing techniques can be 130 SECTION: JOURNALISM LDMD I successfully used to reduce the ambiguity of topics by contextualizing the information in a way the recipient /receiver can connect to what he already knows. Michael Bilig argued that the distinction between ‘patriotism’ (rather positively valued) and ‘nationalism’ (presumably equated with extremism) can overlap the implied distinction of ‘us versus them’. He argued that nationalism is the discourse of the ‘others’ (Bilig, 1995, p.16). Therefore, nationalistic discourse engenders emotional responses in both the speaker and the audience. The aim of this research is to show the elements that describe the discourse of the Greek press during the crises. We acknowledge that some printed media texts are constructed to represent the other side negatively and indirectly maintain the Greek-Turkish tension by creating and promoting stereotypes about the Turks. The Greek daily political newspapers that we have selected for analysis are of national distribution: ‘Makedonia’, a non-tabloid paper published in Thesaloniki, ‘Kathimerini’, another non-tabloid newspaper, published in Athens and three tabloid newspapers, all published in Athens: ‘Eleftherotypia’, ‘Ta Nea’ and ‘Eleftheros Typos’. We have reviewed the front-pages of all published issues from July to September 1976, with an emphasis on certain analysis units as it follows: title of the text/article, object, attitude towards the object, subject, theme, place of events, length of the text, genre, author, occasion of reporting and visual presentation. As a rule, the titles are informative, real, non-metaphoric; the only exception is made by ‘Eleftheros Typos’, which often publishes sensational titles. Generally, the articles are short to medium, they tackle themes related to the Turkish vessel itinerary and the bilateral crisis and they are referring to states, state representatives, organizations and public institutions of both countries, with a negative attitude towards the object (being a state, a public / private institution or a representative of a public institution). ‘Makedonia’ and ‘Kathimerini’ are more likely to have a neutral attitude towards the events. Stereotyping, ethnic categorisation and framing refer to the negative image of the other, either hostility or offensiveness. These publications display in their front page stories the Greek interests and criticise the other side. Turkey is perceived as a country that takes advantage of the Greek Government’s goodwill and considers the Aegean Sea a space of claims.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Armed Forces Intervention in Post-War Turkey: a Methodological Approach of Greek Newspapers Through Political Analyses
    PHOKION KOTZAGEORGIS ARMED FORCES INTERVENTION IN POST-WAR TURKEY: A METHODOLOGICAL APPROACH OF GREEK NEWSPAPERS THROUGH POLITICAL ANALYSES The Press as a political-social phenomenon may influence the forma­ tion of one’s conscience, make or break governments and influence public opinion in a decisive way. As an institution it may play an extremely important role in the writing of a countiy’s contemporary history. It is only recently that this last function of the Press has become the object of scientific research, resulting in the first attempts to write history using newspapers as the basic source. The present article aspires to contribute to the process of ‘deciphering’ the role played by the Press in the formulation or crystallisation of behaviours, political or other, vis-a-vis given facts or phenomena. The article aims at signposting the methodological principles in the presentation by the Greek newspapers of an external affairs event and its use by the political affairs editors of these newspapers. This article was con­ ceived in the course of study of the political game in Turkey as the prominence of the role of the army in that country became evident to the author. The actual cases of army intervention will not be dealt with here; what is of in­ terest is the reaction of the newspapers to the three military interventions in the political life of Turkey. In date order these took place on 27 May 1960, 12 March 1971 and 12 September 1980. The sources chosen are newspapers easily accessible to the public, of differing political persuasions; the time terminus of study is one month be­ fore and one after the date of intervention of the military.
    [Show full text]
  • Thesis Title
    To my parents, Athanassios Kravvas and Eleni Lioudi-Kravva To my children, Bigina and Thanassis Without them I feel that my accomplishments would be somehow incomplete… Acknowledgements There are some people who have contributed –one way or another– to this final product. I would like to thank my Ph.D. supervisors Pat Caplan and Victoria Goddard for their continuous support, guidance and trust in my project and myself. I am grateful to Rena Molho for her help and support through all these years. Stella Salem constantly enhanced my critical understanding and problematised many of my arguments. Of course, I should not forget to mention all my informants for sharing with me their ideas, their fears and who made me feel “at home” whenever they invited me to their homes. I would also like to thank Eleonora Skouteri–Didaskalou a gifted academic who tried to teach me more than ten years ago what anthropology is and why studying it entails a kind of magic. Last but not least I would like to express my gratitude to Ariadni Antonopoulou for helping me with the final version of the text. CONTENTS Introduction: What is to be “cooked” in this book? 1 1. Introducing the Jews of Thessaloniki: Views from within 9 About the present of the Community 9 Conceptualising Jewishness 13 “We are Sephardic Jews” 17 “We don‟t keep kosher but” 20 2. Conceptual “ingredients”: We are what we eat or we eat because we 24 want to belong Part A. Theories: Food as an indicator of social relationships 25 Food and the local-global interplay 29 Ethnicity and boundaries 32 Boundaries and communities 35 Eating food, constructing boundaries and making communities 42 Greece “through the looking glass” and the study of Macedonia 44 Part B.
    [Show full text]
  • The Prespa Agreement One Year After Ratification: from Enthusiasm to Uncertainty?
    The Prespa Agreement one year after ratification: from enthusiasm to uncertainty? Ioannis ARMAKOLAS Ljupcho PETKOVSKI Alexandra VOUDOURI The Prespa Agreement one year after ratification: from enthusiasm to uncertainty? 1 The Prespa Agreement one year after ratification: from enthusiasm to uncertainty? This report was produced as part of the project “Harmonization of Bilateral Relations between North Macedonia and Greece through Monitoring the Implementation of the Prespa Agreement”, funded by the Canadian Fund for Local Initiatives, supported by the Canadian Embassy in Belgrade and implemented by EUROTHINK. The views expressed here do not necessarily reflect the views of the donor. 2 The Prespa Agreement one year after ratification: from enthusiasm to uncertainty? The Prespa Agreement one year after ratification: from enthusiasm to uncertainty? Contents 1 Introduction 4 2 North Macedonia – from Enthusiasm to Realpolitik 5 2.1 The Nascent Golden age: Time of Enthusiasm 5 2.2 It’s Is not About Personalities, It’s is about National Interests:Political realism 6 2.3 Mismanaging Expectations, Well Managing Political Damage – the Period of Disappointment 8 3 The implementation of the Prespa Agreement under New Democracy government in Greece: Progress, Challenges, Prospects 10 3.1 Fierce Opposition: New Democracy in opposition and the Prespa Agreement 10 3.2 Initial Reluctance: New Democracy in office and the ‘hot potato’ of the Prespa Agreement 11 3.3 Turning Point: Greece’s diplomatic reactivation 12 3.4 Foreign Policy Blues: Difficult re-adjustment and Greek policy dilemmas 13 3.5 Bumpy Road Ahead? Uncertain prospects at home and abroad 15 4 Conclusions and key takeaways 18 5 Appendix – List of Official Documents Signed 20 6 Endnotes 21 7 Biography of the Authors 24 The Prespa Agreement one year after ratification: from enthusiasm to uncertainty? 3 1 Introduction n February 2019, the name Macedonia was replaced from boards in border crossings, in the Government web- I site and the signs in various governmental buildings.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Reforms and Collective Action in a Clientelist Party System: Greece
    Reforms and collective action in a clientelist party system: Greece during the Mitsotakis administration (1990-1993)* Aris Trantidis ABSTRACT: Economic reforms face a collective action problem: they trigger the reaction of groups that expect significant losses, while the anticipated gains are often dispersed across the population and too uncertain to animate strong popular support. This pattern may exhibit different characteristics in a clientelist economy where the affected groups are client groups under the protection of political parties. The reform agenda of the Mitsotakis government in Greece (1990-1993) illustrates that the collective action problem affects primarily the internal structure of the clientelist parties and thereby their capacity for political mobilisation. Reforms that depart from the established political equilibrium on economic policy will undermine the internal cohesion of the government party and will offer the opposition party the opportunity to strengthen its own unity and political mobilisation capacity. * This is a draft earlier version of the eponymous article, published in the Journal of South European Society and Politics, 2014, Volume 19, Issue 2, pp. 215-243. Key words: economic reforms, clientelism, political cost, collective action, crisis, Greece Interest groups compete and lobby around the allocation of the benefits and costs of reforms initiated by the government (Alesina and Drazen 1991; Geddes 1994; Heller, Keefer and McCubbins, 1998; Schamis 1999). These groups often act as veto players effectively delaying or blocking reform initiatives (Haggard 2000:28; Tsebelis 2002). Depending on the institutional setting, the government may enjoy a degree of autonomy from group pressures and some room for manoeuvre around the options of co-optation, re-alignment, compromise and compensation (C.f.
    [Show full text]
  • The Far Right in Greece. Paramilitarism, Organized Crime and the Rise of ‘Golden Dawn’
    Südosteuropa 66 (2018), no. 4, pp. 503-531 SPYRIDON TSOUTSOUMPIS The Far Right in Greece. Paramilitarism, Organized Crime and the Rise of ‘Golden Dawn’ Abstract. The article unravels the ties between conservatism, the state, and the far right in Greece. It explores the complex social and political reasons which facilitated the emergence of far-right groups in Greece during the civil war and have allowed them to survive for seven decades and to flourish from time to time. The author pays particular attention to paramilita- rism as a distinct component of the Greek far right. He follows the activities of ‘Golden Dawn’ and other far-right groups, in particular their paramilitary branches. To the wider public, among the most shocking aspects of the rise of ‘Golden Dawn’ was the use of violence by its paramilitary branch, tagmata efodou. The article examines the far right’s relationship to the state and the security services, and explores its overall role in Greek politics and society. He demonstrates how an understanding of the decades following the civil war are indispensable to making sense of recent developments. Spyridon Tsoutsoumpis is a Visiting Research Fellow at Wolverhampton University’s School of Social Historical and Political Studies and an Honorary Research Fellow at the University of Manchester’s School of Arts, Languages and Cultures. In Greece’s national elections of 2012 the openly neofascist ‘Golden Dawn’ party (Xrysi Avgi) won an unprecedented 7% of the vote and sent a total of 18 of its members to parliament (MPs). That success created a flurry among scholars, experts, and politicians who rushed to explain the meteoric rise of the far right in Greece.
    [Show full text]
  • Alexandrou Promotion & Advertising
    ALEXANDROU PROMOTION & ADVERTISING TO : Thessaloniki 4-10-2006 Marketing of Real Estates in Greece and Abroad Direct Marketing & Advertisements in newspapers , magazines and the Web in Greece (500 mass media) and abroad Cooperation and Franchising Madam, Sir, We have specialized in newspaper & magazine advertisements all over Greece. Due to our longstanding experience with a wide range of clients from technical and real estate branches we decided to launch our own real estate marketing programme in 2006 to sell Greek estates abroad. In detail: Looking for clients in GREECE? Looking for clients ABROAD? Commercial adverts-announcements in daily and We market real estates in 28 countries! weekly newspapers (Athens/Thessaloniki/rest of Greece) ASK FOR OUR SPECIAL OFFERS! 1. With Direct Marketing REBATES POSSIBLE! • Only 290 € per 300 real estate brokers examples: special offers for realtors: in any country of your choice! (480 • 9 adverts in every Sunday edition of the daily €/500 real estate brokers & 960 €/ 1000 newspaper MAKEDONIA for one year– 54 € /month brokers) • 1 advert in the AGGELIOFOROS 3,99 € • 20% discount on the price given above • adverts in “ Metro-Advertisements” = 1,14 € per advert & special price packages until 30/03/2006 Ask for our offers! We select the newspaper, create adverts etc. to 1. Advertisements in foreign newspapers help you to save time and trouble – adverts in any from 01/01/07 Greek newspaper (e.g. Ta Nea, To Vima, Kathimerini, ( in many countries all over the world!! ) Aggelioforos, Makedonia, Ethnos, Eleftheros
    [Show full text]
  • Macedonia in Greek Administration
    Preface When in 1821 Greeks started their revolt against the Ottoman Empire and fought for an independent state they had two major ideological issues to deal with: the identity of the new state and its future borders. If Hellas (Ελλάς) was the appropriate name for Modern Greece and ancient glory the most valuable argument for Greek independence, then how could Macedonia been kept apart? After all it was an integral part of Greek ancient history, which had nourished every single generation of educated people—not only Greeks—even before the war of Greek independence. The legendary figure of Alexander the Great had surfed smoothly over centuries of ignorance escorted by powerful myths and tales to find its appropriate position in the last part of 19th century, ancient history textbooks. They were the chapters of the Macedonian Hegemony and the Hellenistic period (4th and 3rd centuries B.C.), which had brought Greek culture to the frontiers of the then known world. Ancient History proved a very solid and enduring foundation for the modern Greek state. In this context, in the last quarter of the 19th century the case of Macedonia, this ill-defined region, was regarded as the final frontier of Hellenism, which Greece had to defend against the Slavs, if it was to survive as a state and not to end up as a sad caricature of Ancient Hellas. The romantic fight of the Greeks for Macedonia—in fact for the littoral part of it—created its own legend, which was shaped through a series of declared and undeclared wars from the 1878 Eastern Crisis to World War II.
    [Show full text]
  • The Hugo Valentin Centre
    The Hugo Valentin Centre Master Thesis in Holocaust and Genocide Studies Making Room for the Holocaust? Entangled Memory Regimes and Polarized Contestation about the Greek 1940s in Thessaloniki Student: Dimitrios Tziogkas Term and year: Spring 2021 Credits: 45 Supervisor: Tomislav Dulić Word count: 31.011 Contents Abstract .................................................................................................................... 2 Acknowledgements .................................................................................................. 3 Introduction .............................................................................................................. 4 Research Overview .................................................................................................. 5 Research Design..................................................................................................... 14 Theory .................................................................................................................... 14 Research Questions ................................................................................................ 24 Method ................................................................................................................... 25 Empirical Analysis ................................................................................................. 31 Renaming the Chrysochoou Street......................................................................... 31 Left-Right Cleavage and Political
    [Show full text]
  • Sia Kyriakakos E-Mail: Siakyriakakos@Yahoo.Com
    Sia Kyriakakos e-mail: siakyriakakos@yahoo.com EDUCATION: MFA The School of the Art Institute of Chicago; Chicago, IL. Full Tuition Merit Scholarship. 2000. CT Certification Central Connecticut State University; New Britain, CT, Major: Art Education, K – 12. 1994 BFA Maryland Institute, College of Art; Baltimore, MD. Major: Sculpture. 1991 Studio Arts Center International; Florence, Italy, Concentration: Renaissance Art. 1988 SELECTED AWARDS & SCHOLARSHIPS: UNESCO Foundation. First Prize Award. The 4th Citenje Biennale, Montenegro 2002 Fulbright. Student award to Greece. 2000-2001. J.F. Costopoulos Foundation. Artist’s Grant. 2002 Full Tuition Merit Scholarship, $ 40,000. School of the Art Institute of Chicago, (1998 - 2000) H.B. Harvey Merit Scholarship (1989) $5,000 Maryland Institute Scholarship (1987) Four Year Tuition Merit Based Scholarship TEACHER CERTIFICATION: State of Maryland: Art Education Pre –K to 12, pending State of Connecticut: Art Education Pre – K to 12 WORK EXPERIENCE: Artist in Residence, Orebro Art School, Orebro, Sweden. 2007 and 2008 Art Educator, Green Hill International School. American High School. Athens, Greece 2001 – 2004 Art Educator, Colchester Intermediate School, Jack Jackter Elementary School, Colchester, CT 1994 - 1998 Head of Art Department at Colchester Intermediate School and art teacher at Jack Jackter Elementary School. -Developed an art education curriculum for CIS -Collaborated with colleagues in developing a district wide art education program Videographer. Educational video (1 hr ) Ecological and environmental studies for Gourlandri, Museum of Natural History, Athens, GR in collaboration with Aegean University, Mitilini, GR Professor’s Assistant, School of the Art Institute of Chicago, Chicago IL. Sept. 1999 – May 2000. Sculpture First Year Program, and Fiber Department RESIDENCIES: KIBLA.
    [Show full text]
  • LEGAL ENTITY / NAME of INDIVIDUAL AMOUNTS (Pre Taxes
    INFORMATION EUROBANK GROUP FOR THE PERIOD 01/01 - 31/03/2021 PURSUANT TO ARTICLE 6 OF L.4374 / 2016 PAYMENTS ON CONSOLIDATED BASIS PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH 1 OF ARTICLE 6 OF L.4374/2016 REGARDING LEGAL ENTITIES AMOUNTS LEGAL ENTITY / NAME OF INDIVIDUAL (pre taxes and charges) 1984 PRODUCTIONS S.A. 2.400,00 ABP PUBLISHING PRIVATE COMPANY 1.500,00 AIRLINK S.A. 5.951,90 ALLIANCE FOR GREECE 2.000,00 ALPHA 989 S.A. 7.499,97 ALPHA SATELLITE TV S.A. 76.463,34 ALTER EGO MEDIA S.A. 86.443,94 AMOS INTERNATIONAL PRIVATE COMPANY 1.000,00 APE-MPE S.A. 8.400,00 ASLANIDIS GEORG. ANASTASIOS 3.000,00 ATHENS VOICE S.A. 6.956,00 AUTOTRITI S.A. 1.350,00 BANKINGNEWS S.A. 32.000,00 BEHLIVANOS I. CHRISTOS 5.000,00 BOULEVARD FRΕΕ PRESS PRIVATE COMPANY 1.530,00 BOUSSIAS COMMUNICATIONS LLC 350,00 BROADCASTING PROMOTION S.A. SPORT TV 5.975,02 CAPITAL.GR S.A. 43.999,99 CRETAPOST PRIVATE COMPANY 1.200,00 D. KONSTANTOPOULOS & CO LIMITED PARNTERSHIP 1.000,00 DAM PRODUCTIONS S.A. 4.296,50 DESMI S.A. 5.834,00 DG NEWSAGENCY S.A. 1.555,00 DIMERA PUBLISHING S.A. 1.115,00 DIO DEKA PUBLISHING S.A. 6.560,00 DIONISIOS MPOURAS & CO LIMITED PARTNERSHIP 4.000,00 DITIONE LIMITED INTERNET ENTERPRISES 1.750,00 DPG DIGITAL MEDIA S.A. 4.445,00 DYADIKI ENIMEROSI LIMITED PARTNERSHIP 6.000,00 ELEYTHERIA TOY TYPOU PUBLISHING S.A. 628,00 ENIKOS S.A.
    [Show full text]
  • Central & Eastern Europe Market & Mediafact 2009 Edition
    Central & Eastern Europe Market & MediaFact 2009 Edition Compiled by: Anne Austin, Nicola Hutcheon Produced by: David Parry © 2010 ZenithOptimedia All rights reserved. This publication is protected by copyright. No part of it may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form, or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying or otherwise, without written permission from the copyright owners. ISSN 1469-6622 Every effort has been made in the preparation of this book to ensure accuracy of the contents, but the publishers and copyright owners cannot accept liability in respect of errors or omissions. Readers will appreciate that the data is only as up-to-date as printing schedules will allow and is subject to change. ZENITHOPTIMEDIA ZenithOptimedia is one of the world's leading ZenithOptimedia is committed to delivering to global media services agencies with 218 offices clients the best possible return on their in 72 countries. advertising investment. Key clients include AlcatelLucent, Beam Global This approach is supported by a unique system Spirits & Wine, British Airways, Darden for strategy development and implementation, Restaurants, Electrolux, General Mills, Giorgio The ROI Blueprint. At each stage, proprietary Armani Parfums, Kingfisher, Mars, Nestlé, ZOOM (ZenithOptimedia Optimisation of Media) L'Oréal, Puma, Polo Ralph Lauren, Qantas, tools have been designed to add value and Richemont Group, Sanofi-Aventis, Siemens, insight. Thomson Multimedia, Toyota/Lexus, Verizon, Whirlpool and Wyeth. The ZenithOptimedia
    [Show full text]
  • Macedonia: the Conflict and the Media
    MACEDONIA: THE CONFLICT AND THE MEDIA SEENPM / BHRN Macedonian Institute for Media, Skopje, Macedonia 1 This book is published under the cross-cutting project Media coverage of the Macedonian Conflict of the South East European Network for Professionalization of the Media (SEENPM) and Balkan Human Rights Network (BHRN) with the kind support of FRESTA SEE Program of the Danish Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Foundation Press Now, Netherlands We would like to thanks to all contributors and partners who assist us in putting together and publishing this book: authors, editor, copy editors, interpreters, collaborators, our partner organizations from SEE region, members of SEENPM and all others involved in the execution of the project. This book is published in the following languages: Macedonian, Albanian and English. 2 MACEDONIA: THE CONFLICT AND THE MEDIA Macedonian Institute for Media Skopje, 2003 3 MACEDONIA: The Conflict and The Media Publisher: Macedonian Institute for Media Porta Bunjakovec A2/1, 1000 Skopje R.Macedonia www.mim.org.mk mim@mim.org.mk Copyright @ 2003 by Macedonian Institute for Media, Macedonia All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of the Publisher. Editor: Alistair Crighton Copy editors: Annabel Egan & Bronwyn Jones CIP - Katalogizacija vo publikacija narodna i univerzitetska biblioteka “Sv. Kliment Ohridski”, Skopje 316.774:355.48(497.7)”2001” 355.48(497.7):316.774”2001” MACEDONIA: the conflict and the media / [editor: Alistair Crighton]. - Skopje: Macedonian Institute for Media, 2003.
    [Show full text]