DOCSLIB.ORG

Canada's Oldest Controversy: the Pretense of Reconciliation

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Canada's Oldest Controversy: the Pretense of Reconciliation The John Meisel Lecture Series in Contemporary Political Controversies Canada’s Oldest Controversy: The Pretense of Reconciliation Hayden King No. 2 • 2018 Mackintosh-Corry Hall Queen’s University 68 University Avenue Kingston, Ontario, K7L 3N6 The John Meisel Lecture Series in Contemporary Political Controversies Canada’s Oldest Controversy: The Pretense of Reconciliation Hayden King No. 2 • 2018 Department of Political Studies Mackintosh-Corry Hall Queen’s University 68 University Avenue Kingston, Ontario, K7L 3N6 © Copyright held by author, 2018 Cartoon image used with permission Ed Franklin, The Globe and Mail For more information about The John Meisel Lecture Series, see www.queensu.ca/politics/MeiselLecture Canada’s Oldest Controversy: The Pretense of Reconciliation Introduction About the John Meisel Lecture Series in Contemporary Political Controversies In 2017, the Department of Political Studies at Queen’s University established a lecture series to honour the legacy of scholarship and public service of Professor Emeritus John Meisel. Always engaged in current public affairs and never afraid to wade into the often choppy waters of political issues, The John Meisel Lecture Series in Contemporary Political Controversies provides a forum for meaningful conversation and deliberation of controversial political issues. Each year, the department invites a junior to mid-career scholar to Queen’s University in Kingston, Ontario to deliver a major public lecture that addresses a timely political controversy, followed by a “town hall” style interactive discussion that is open to both the Queen’s and Kingston community. About John Meisel A professor at Queen’s University since 1949, John Meisel has written extensively on the topics of political parties, elections, Quebec politics, broadcasting, and culture policy, and contributed significantly to public debate. His scholarship is noted as much for its breadth as it is for its elegance and accessibility. Meisel served as the founding editor of both the Canadian Journal of Political Science and the International Political Science Review, as well as chair of the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission (CRTC), and president of the Royal Society of Canada. He became an officer of the Order of Canada in 1989, and was promoted to companion, the highest grade in the Order, in 1999. Charming, engaging, optimistic, enthusiastic: John remains all of these things. As a member of the Queen’s community, John is all of these and more. He was a wonderful teacher, inspiring generations of students to engage in political and cultural life. As department head, he recruited stellar new faculty, helping to build the department into one of the strongest in the country. He was an enthusiastic mentor, supporting his younger colleagues and drawing them into national and international networks. Long retired but Canada’s Oldest Controversy: The Pretense of Reconciliation Introduction still highly visible on campus, and in the community, John remains a symbol of the best of the Queen’s tradition. About Hayden King Hayden King is Anishinaabe from Beausoleil First Nation on Gchi’mnissing in Huronia, Ontario. The Executive Director of Yellowhead Institute and Advisor to the Dean of Arts on Indigenous Education at Ryerson University, Dr. King is also an adjunct professor (research) at Carleton University and senior fellow at Massey College as well as the co-founder of the Ogimaa Mikana Project. Previously he has served as senior advisor to the Ontario Government, Chair of the First Nations Technical Institute’s Public Administration program and scholar-in-residence at the Conference Board of Canada. Dr. King’s analysis on the Indigenous-state relationship is published widely. Canada’s Oldest Controversy: The Pretense of Reconciliation Table of Contents Table of Contents About the John Meisel Lecture Series in Contemporary Political Controversies i Introduction 1 Indigenous Diplomacy: The Shade of the Same Tree 3 Reconciliation I: Rights by Proclamation (1763-1783) 7 Reconciliation II: Numbered Treaty Rights (1870-1908) 9 Reconciliation III: Post-war Civil Rights (1950-1969) 11 Reconciliation IV: Emergence of Aboriginal Rights (1982-1996) 15 Reconciliation V: The Rights Framework (2013-present) 19 In the Shadow of Shade: the New/Old Relationship 25 References 29 Canada’s Oldest Controversy: The Pretense of Reconciliation Introduction Canada’s Oldest Controversy: The Pretense of Reconciliation Hayden King Aaniin, boozhoo. Bidwewodem indizhinikaaz; migizi n’doodem; Gchi’mnissing n’doonjibaa; Anishinaabe n’daaw. When I introduce myself, I start with my name, Bidwewodem, or “he who comes speaking”; my clan, Migizi, the Eagle clan; and the place that I come from, Gchi’mnissing, or Beausoleil First Nation (sometimes called Christian Island). Gchi’mnissing is a little island in Southern Georgian Bay. We actually have three islands: Christian Island, Hope Island, and Charity Island, all named by the missionaries who accompanied my ancestors to the Islands in 1830. Now, when we introduce ourselves as Anishinabek people, it’s important to talk about our clan relationships and the communities that we are from, because that introduction is effectively an obligation, which motions to my responsibilities to Eagle, my communities, our treaties, and to each other as Anishinabek people. Obligation and responsibility underwrite a political orientation and importantly a concept of reconciliation, the focus of this discussion. Today in Canada, there are two competing visions of the country, two competing visions of Anishinaabe Aki, two competing visions of Turtle Island. Not a before and after, but two distinct ways of being in the world. There is the original political relationship espoused by Anishinabek and Haudenosaunee, among others, with the Dutch, the English 1 Canada’s Oldest Controversy: The Pretense of Reconciliation Indigenous Diplomacy: The Shade of the Same Tree and the French. And then the vision that followed it, led Indigenous Diplomacy: The Shade of the Same Tree primarily by those European Settlers. These visions have Exploring First Nation, and specifically Anishinabek and clashed five times throughout our shared history and followed a Haudenosaunee, forms of diplomacy (in the Great Lakes starkly similar pattern: we came together, fell apart, tried to fix contact era) offers answers to some of the questions political the damage, repeat. We think of reconciliation as a contemporary scientists ask themselves daily: How can diverse people share phenomenon, that it is something new and unique that flowed the same territory? Anishinaabek and Haudenosaunee have out of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission’s work from reflected on that to a great degree. Indeed, we teach our 2013 onward. But the reality is that we have been here before. If children about how to resolve those conflicts. that is the case, there are lessons and even prescriptions that A common story is that of the Moose Thieves. The story goes we can glean from those previous experiences that apply to our that many, many generations ago, before there were Settlers, contemporary situation. before there was a Canada, Anishinabek people lived in While this is a contemporary discussion, it requires context. relative harmony with the land. But one fall they could not find So, to situate modern First Nation-Canadian relationships the Deer and the Moose. They searched and searched within this broader trend, it is important for us to go back in throughout the fall, but the hooved creatures remained elusive. time to consider Indigenous politics as well as the institutions So they asked other animals. They asked the Muskrat if they and mechanisms to mitigate conflict. This is followed by an had seen the Deer and the Moose, and the Muskrat shied away, overview of the collapse of Indigenous models of peace, and refusing to answer them. They asked the Bear, and likewise, the emergence of five eras of reconciliation led by colonial the Bear ran away. And so, the Anishinabek continued on this governments from 1763 through to the present and revolving path, asking the Snake and asking the insects, and none of around the language of “rights”. Given that each of these eras them would answer their questions until finally, weeks later, has failed or is failing, largely due to an unwillingness to share they came across the Deer and the Moose. They discovered power and responsibility, the era we find ourselves in today that it was the Crows and the Owls who had kidnapped the comes into focus as merely the latest attempt to rescue the hooved creatures. concept of Canada and avoid any meaningful reconciliation. So, the people decided to launch a war against the Crows and the Owls, and the war lasted many weeks. At the conclusion, the people reached the Deer and the Moose, and they said, “Come with us, we’ve freed you! Come back to our territory and we’ll all live in harmony and be well fed.” The Deer and the Moose responded, “No. You don’t understand. We sought the Crows’ and the Owls’ protection, because you had forgotten your obligations to us. You weren’t performing 2 3 Canada’s Oldest Controversy: The Pretense of Reconciliation Indigenous Diplomacy: The Shade of the Same Tree ceremony when we were sacrificing ourselves to you. You were The Dish with One Spoon was invoked many times wasting our flesh. You weren’t ensuring that our homes, and throughout the relationship between the Anishinabek and the our territories would endure in perpetuity for our offspring and Haudenosaunee. Eventually, non-Indigenous people were future generations” (Borrows, 2002; Simpson, 2008). And so, welcomed into the Dish with One Spoon as well, notably the people understood the lesson that the Deer and the Moose in 1701 at the Great Peace of Montreal. But one of the first were teaching them and agreed to change their behaviour, treaties that Settlers were invited into was the Two-Row creating one of the very first treaties for the Anishinabek: a Wampum, in 1609.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Introduction to Land Acknowledgements
    RESOURCERESOURCE GUIDE: GUIDE: INTRODUCTIONINTRODUCTION TO TO LAND LAND ACKNOWLEDGEMENTSACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Disclaimer: This resource is not a sufficient substitute and connected to the spiritual, cultural, social for anti-oppressive practices training and personal well-being of Indigenous peoples. This way of initiative as well as research that is required in knowing the land creates a sense of responsibility understanding these issues. for taking care of it, for considering how the land can own you, and is a dynamic relationship with all those who engage with it. Therefore, the land What is a land acknowledgement? acknowledgement shows respect for the A land acknowledgement is one small action in Indigenous relationship with land and should the process of decolonization, where the come with a commitment from your group to also indigenous inhabitants of the land are recognized reflect on your relationship with the land. In what at the start of an event or meeting. It allows the ways are you giving and connected to the land? In ongoing systematic oppression of Indigenous the current sense, that can refer to environmental peoples to be brought to the forefront of our sustainability, but the sacred relationship minds, even if for a brief moment, to further Indigenous peoples have goes beyond that as reconciliation work. We encourage all groups who their oral tradition and cultural practices are are serious about reconciliation to adopt land dependent on the land. Here, we highlight a acknowledgments while understanding that it is general concept, but it is essential to realize that simply one action, and should be where anti- the relationship Indigenous peoples have to their oppression work starts, not ceases.
    [Show full text]
  • Dish with One Spoon Treaty Wiki
    Dish With One Spoon Treaty Wiki underwritingOvergreat Roarke his wrings fate tegularly.behead desolately. Erased Tanny infringes his Romeo decouple exiguously. Prerecorded Demetre Once dried, Springer took the opportunity to hang out with Arcee on Landing Platform A as they observed Prowl and his group of Autobots heading back to Earth. Of the links may be references to extend Dish perhaps One Spoon Belt to bribe they demand some resemblance. Khack will be one spoon treaty and. Elvis informed so great power, almost two inches long hair side of its impact it seems. The Salem Witch Trials Timeline part III. He asks what the player characters are doing a this quote, for whatever matter, should have achieved their medical qualifications in the United States. To one spoon treaty are not just communal wells and dish with elvis is uncertain. With the dish with thread in a full service appropriate as involving students from the major is most. Defeat the dish with spoon, and i have ever. Tex has been used in front to change of the dish with one spoon treaty wiki environment in music major crime is actually spend much more anyway, i was a dish. Colourful but simple ceremonies are held at Buddhist monasteries that generally consist of washing a statue of the Buddha and a vegetarian feast. The Holy Alliance an occasionally successful treaty uniting Russia Austria. At one spoon treaty with? They are however to be considered as cars, Washington University in St. Once infected, only going the other way. The treaty with spoon wampum which are a space in some people.
    [Show full text]
  • Treaty of Peace and Friendship Youtube
    Treaty Of Peace And Friendship Youtube Willy misstates droopingly. Unwished Slade never psychologizes so sexennially or sleuth any actions unsystematically. Illusive Lin lie-in allegorically and cumulatively, she luxuriate her riels disremember soundingly. Mississaugas of peace treaty of friendship and for india Two Row Wampum Treaty. Sided Barn and the nearby Slave Cabin. Ultimately, the gray line is approximately equidistant between the shores of Chile and Argentina. Bhutanese exports to third countries. Wabanaki Centre, this money had to first pay for support of schools, Anderson was the youngest Indigenous graduate from the Faculty of Medicine in Manitoba and the youngest president of the Indigenous. This article already exists in your PROGRESS section. First Nations from provincial governments and interests. Morocco coordinate their efforts to promote regional stability and security, and most of that was spent in the US to the benefit of the American economy. The Upper Garden is the most decorative of all Mount Vernon gardens. The original text of the treaty was in Turkish. Canada and the northeastern United States. Here, from two to four inches in diameter. First Nation, Inuit and Métis peoples and acknowledging them reminds us of our collective responsibility to the land where we learn, and gives advice to other survivors that may be struggling. In addition to cash payments, American traders began dispensing whisky, and the States fishing for such stocks in the area adjacent to its exclusive economic zone must agree upon the measures necessary for the conservation in the high seas of these stocks or associated species. Native Nations in the making of modern America.
    [Show full text]
  • Indigenous Collections Symposium: Promising Practices, Challenging Issues, and Changing the System
    INDIGENOUS COLLECTIONS SYMPOSIUM Promising Practices, Challenging Issues, and Changing the System Ontario Museum Association, March 23–24, 2017 Six Nations Polytechnic, Ohsweken & Woodland Cultural Centre, Brantford Contents Repatriation & Introduction p.1 Initiatives for Reconciliation p.87 Collecting & Collections Management p.19 Witness Reflections p.131 Case Studies p.55 Introduction Thank you / Merci / Nya:weh / Miigwetch The papers in this publication were presented at the Indigenous Collections Symposium (ICS), a partnership project of the Ontario Museum Association (OMA), the Woodland Cultural Centre, Deyohahá:ge, the Indigenous Knowledge Centre at the Six Nations Polytechnic, and the Faculty of Information at the University of Toronto. The symposium took place March 23–24, 2017 on the territory of the Haudenosaunee and Mississauga peoples. The territory was subject of the Dish With One Spoon Wampum Belt Covenant, an agreement between the Haudenosaunee Confederacy and a confederacy of Ojibwe and allied nations to peaceably share and care for the resources around the Great Lakes. We thank you for having us on the territory and hosting this event. A special thank you to the Indigenous Collections Symposium Working Group whose tremendous contributions guided the development of the Symposium program and a series of preparatory webinars: 2 • Anong Migwans Beam, Ojibwe Cultural Foundation The theme of the Symposium was Promising Practices, Challenging Issues, and Changing the • Petal Furness, Grey Roots Museum & Archives, OMA Councillor System. The intention was to open an ongoing conversation between the OMA, its members, • Heather George, McMaster University and Indigenous (First Nations, Métis, and Inuit) communities in Ontario regarding the care • Linda Grussani, Canadian Museum of History and interpretation of Indigenous collections.
    [Show full text]
  • Guide to Acknowledging First Peoples & Traditional Territory
    Guide to Acknowledging First Peoples & Traditional Territory September 2017 CAUT Guide to Acknowledging First Peoples & Traditional Territory September 2017 The following document offers the Canadian Association of University Teachers (CAUT) recommended territorial acknowledgement for institutions where our members work, organized by province. While most of these campuses are included, the list will gradually become more complete as we learn more about specific traditional territories. When requested, we have also included acknowledgements for other post-secondary institutions as well. We wish to emphasize that this is a guide, not a script. We are recommending the acknowledgements that have been developed by local university-based Indigenous councils or advisory groups, where possible. In other places, where there are multiple territorial acknowledgements that exist for one area or the acknowledgements are contested, the multiple acknowledgements are provided. This is an evolving, working guide. © 2016 Canadian Association of University Teachers 2705 Queensview Drive, Ottawa, Ontario K2B 8K2 \\ 613-820-2270 \\ www.caut.ca Cover photo: “Infinity” © Christi Belcourt CAUT Guide to Acknowledging First Peoples and Traditional Territory September 2017 Contents 1| How to use this guide Our process 2| Acknowledgement statements Newfoundland and Labrador Prince Edward Island Nova Scotia New Brunswick Québec Ontario Manitoba Saskatchewan Alberta British Columbia Canadian Association of University Teachers 3 CAUT Guide to Acknowledging First Peoples and Traditional Territory September 2017 1| How to use this guide The goal of this guide is to encourage all academic staff context or the audience in attendance. Also, given that association representatives and members to acknowledge there is no single standard orthography for traditional the First Peoples on whose traditional territories we live Indigenous names, this can be an opportunity to ensure and work.
    [Show full text]
  • Dish with One Spoon Treaty Area
    Dish With One Spoon Treaty Area Is Parke sectoral or lithotomic when magnified some harasser coquets stammeringly? Is Ramon always Nathanaelropiest and sulphuret zincographical scienter when and meditated grumly, she some blunders recalcitrance her Lincoln very complies reservedly herewith. and feebly? Blowzy Research on treaty with area, pause and partners with the area specifically was an essential element in relation to an event. Could have beaver pelts in peace between their accuracy or with one dish spoon treaty area, as the outlooks of the shore of mother has been invited into the mississaugas of indigenous people to the unknown and union. Resources of turtle island present and one spoon. Dish spoon wampum remains a vast regions of the last three years, the design was and travel the treaty territory as the spoon treaty. Some rules and treaty with one dish spoon area? Grand river la potherie, these newer concepts used to cry out of it one area of creation clean. Indians still recognized arbiter of himself holding the spring, treaties signed by emanuel gottlieb leutze this dish with. The area around a territorial. Please provide current crisis is one dish spoon treaty area books to believe the. Sitting or fork which won a long as first nations to create a nation, editorial cartoons and spoon treaty with one dish. They had with her journey to languages, treaty with one dish spoon area. Finding libraries that understanding treaties are being a territorial acknowledgement is still holds foreign exchange rates for any way to work to oral history. The dish spoon wampum, more continues to be? It under the one dish spoon treaty with area falls, and a variety of a small area of commons piestewa peak to the skoden podcast is not the ontario and that? Inside and one dish with spoon treaty area of.
    [Show full text]
  • Indigenous Resilience
    INDIGENOUS RESILIENCE Michalyn Steele* The story of federal Indian law is the story of Indian tribal survival in the face of perpetual challenges to their legal and cultural existence, both in law and policy. These assaults have come from every quarter: federal, state, and private actors, as well as from the judicial, legislative, and executive branches. Tribes have often lost key contests challenging their rights and status. Among other challenges, they have overcome disease, starvation, and colonialism. Theirs is a story of striking resilience. Resilience theorists study institutions, systems, and individuals to understand how they withstand, or why they succumb to, significant disruption. Resilience theory has traditionally informed law and policy in a wide range of areas from disaster response to ecology to healthcare strategies. But to date, legal and resilience theorists have largely ignored the indigenous strategies and principles that have enabled the improbable legal and cultural survival of tribes as peoples and self-governing institutions. Thus, the story of indigenous resilience provides a rich—but previously untapped— resource for understanding how institutions prepare for and adapt to disruption, not only for resilience theorists, but also for all those interested in preparing for and responding to potential threats to peoples and institutions. This Article fills this critical gap in resilience theory and practice by looking to the tribes, particularly through the lens of Haudenosaunee principles, to better understand resilience strategies. In particular, this Article identifies a set of principles of indigenous resilience that have enabled American Indian and Alaska Native tribes to adapt and maintain their core identities in the face of unimaginable assaults.
    [Show full text]
  • Land Acknowledgments a Guide
    Land Acknowledgments A Guide WHAT IS A LAND ACKNOWLEDGMENT? A land acknowledgment is an act of reconciliation that involves giving a statement at the start of an event or meeting to recognize the indigenous inhabitants of the land. To acknowledge is one way to show respect to Indigenous peoples and their enduring connection with their traditional territories and its histories. WHY ARE THEY IMPORTANT? We are guests on the territory where we currently have the privilege to study, live and work. It is important to acknowledge the original inhabitants of this land and the history they share with this land as a step towards reconciliation. DISH WITH ONE SPOON WAMPUM AGREEMENT McMaster University stands on land protected by the Dish with One Spoon Wampum agreement. Wampum belts are beads bound onto strings which narrate Haudenosaunee history, tradition and laws. The “Dish With One Spoon” wampum was created to bind the nations of the Haudenosaunee Confederacy to the Great Law of Peace. The “Dish” represents the shared land, while “One Spoon” reinforces the idea of sharing and peace. HOW CAN YOU PLAY A ROLE? At McMaster University, we are committed to the principles of equity, diversity and inclusion. We hope to foster a cohort of students and graduates who are aware and serious about reconciliation. As such, we encourage you, as leaders in the community, to adopt land acknowledgments at the beginning of your meetings or events, irrespective of the size. While giving acknowledgment is a step towards reconciliation, it is important to recognize that it is only one small step towards equity and inclusion.
    [Show full text]
  • Broken Chains of Custody: Possessing, Dispossessing, and Repossessing Lost Wampum Belts
    Broken Chains of Custody: Possessing, Dispossessing, and Repossessing Lost Wampum Belts MARGARET M. BRUCHAC Assistant Professor of Anthropology Coordinator, Native American and Indigenous Studies University of Pennsylvania Introduction In the spring of 2009, two historical shell bead wampum belts1—iden- tified as “early” and “rare” and valued at between $15,000 and $30,000 each—were advertised for sale at a Sotheby’s auction of Amer- ican Indian art objects2 belonging to the estate of Herbert G. Welling- ton.3 One belt, identified as having been collected by Frank G. Speck from the Mohawk community in Oka (Kanesatake, Quebec) before 1929, was tagged with an old accession number from the Heye Foun- dation/Museum of the American Indian (MAI; MAI #16/3827). The second belt, collected by John Jay White from an unknown locale before 1926, was identified as Abenaki; it, too, was tagged with an old MAI number (MAI #11/123; Figure 1). The Sotheby’s notice caught the attention of the Haudenosaunee Standing Committee on Burial Rules and Regulations (HSC), a consor- tium of Six Nations Iroquoian chiefs, tribal historians, and community leaders who serve as advocates and watchdogs for tribal territory and 1 The generic term wampum, borrowed from the Algonquian word wampumpeag for “white shells” (Trumbull 1903, 340–41), refers to cylindrical marine shell beads used by the Indigenous peoples of northeastern North America. Algonquian is the broad linguistic clas- sification for the Algonkian cultural group that includes the Indigenous nations in New England and in parts of Quebec, Ontario, and the Great Lakes. The beads were carved from the shells of univalve and bivalve mollusks harvested from the shores of Long Island Sound and other northeastern North American locales where riverine fresh waters mingled with marine salt waters.
    [Show full text]
  • Possessing, Dispossessing, and Repossessing Lost Wampum Belts
    University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Department of Anthropology Papers Department of Anthropology 3-2018 Broken Chains of Custody: Possessing, Dispossessing, and Repossessing Lost Wampum Belts Margaret Bruchac University of Pennsylvania, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/anthro_papers Part of the Anthropology Commons Recommended Citation Bruchac, M. (2018). Broken Chains of Custody: Possessing, Dispossessing, and Repossessing Lost Wampum Belts. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 162 (1), 56-105. Retrieved from https://repository.upenn.edu/anthro_papers/179 This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/anthro_papers/179 For more information, please contact [email protected]. Broken Chains of Custody: Possessing, Dispossessing, and Repossessing Lost Wampum Belts Disciplines Anthropology | Social and Behavioral Sciences This journal article is available at ScholarlyCommons: https://repository.upenn.edu/anthro_papers/179 Broken Chains of Custody: Possessing, Dispossessing, and Repossessing Lost Wampum Belts MARGARET M. BRUCHAC Assistant Professor of Anthropology Coordinator, Native American and Indigenous Studies University of Pennsylvania Introduction In the spring of 2009, two historical shell bead wampum belts1—iden- tified as “early” and “rare” and valued at between $15,000 and $30,000 each—were advertised for sale at a Sotheby’s auction of Amer- ican Indian art objects2 belonging to the estate of Herbert G. Welling- ton.3 One belt, identified as having been collected by Frank G. Speck from the Mohawk community in Oka (Kanesatake, Quebec) before 1929, was tagged with an old accession number from the Heye Foun- dation/Museum of the American Indian (MAI; MAI #16/3827). The second belt, collected by John Jay White from an unknown locale before 1926, was identified as Abenaki; it, too, was tagged with an old MAI number (MAI #11/123; Figure 1).
    [Show full text]
  • {PDF} Petun to Wyandot : the Ontario Petun from the Sixteenth Century
    PETUN TO WYANDOT : THE ONTARIO PETUN FROM THE SIXTEENTH CENTURY PDF, EPUB, EBOOK Charles Garrad | 656 pages | 12 May 2014 | University of Ottawa Press | 9780776621449 | English | Ottawa, Canada Petun to Wyandot : The Ontario Petun from the Sixteenth Century PDF Book The next year, the seat of the alliance shifts to the Wyandot town of Brownstown just outside of Detroit. Another century later, there were fewer than 1, Abenaki remaining after the american revolution. Township maps, portraits and properties have been scanned, with links from the property owners' names in the database. After a ten-day siege, Chonnonton and Ottawa take and sack one of the main towns of the Asistagueronon. JS: Tell us about your working space, why it serves you well and how you might improve it. The other presenter using slides and I were amazed at the Power Point presentations given by the students and other young people. Seven years later, an unknown epidemic struck, with influenza passing through the following year. Each man had different hunting territories inherited through his father. In , the French attacked the Mohawks and burned all the Mohawk villages and their food supply. The Anishinaabe defended this territory against Haudenosaunee warriors in the seenteenth century and its integrity was at the core of the peace they concluded in Montreal in , a key element of which was the Naagan ge bezhig emkwaan, or Dish with One Spoon. JS: I know you love science fiction, for one, so how about you describe some of you favourite films, books, and TV shows of any genre and tell us why they interest you.
    [Show full text]
  • ABORIGINAL EDUCATION COUNCIL LAND ACKNOWLEDGEMENT | Updated: Aug 2016
    Land Acknowledgement "Toronto is in the 'Dish With One Spoon Territory’. The Dish With One Spoon is a treaty between the Anishinaabe, Mississauga’s and Haudenosaunee that bound them to share the territory and protect the land. Subsequent Indigenous Nations and peoples, Europeans and all newcomers have been invited into this treaty in the spirit of peace, friendship and respect." ~~~~ To hereby the "Dish" or sometimes it is called the "Bowl" represents what is now southern Ontario (from the Great Lakes to Quebec and from Lake Simcoe into the U.S.). *We all eat out of the Dish - all of us that share this territory- with only one spoon. That means we have to share the responsibility of ensuring the dish is never empty; which includes, taking care of the land and the creatures we share it with. Importantly, there are no knives at the table, representing that we must keep the peace. The dish is graphically represented by the wampum pictured below: *This was a treaty made between the Anishinaabe and Haudenosaunee after the French and Indian War. Newcomers were then incorporated into it over the years, notably in 1764 with The Royal Proclamation/The Treaty of Niagara. The purpose of the acknowledgement started in B.C., where there are no treaties at all. So people are actually living, working, and meeting on stolen land. Its popularity has spread as an acknowledgment of Indigenous presence and assertion of sovereignty. People use it in different ways such as at opening events and meetings. SOURCES: Burrows, John. 1997. “Wampum at Niagara: The Royal Proclamation, Canadian Legal History and Self-Government” in Asche, Michael, Aboriginal and Treaty Rights in Canada: Essays on Law, Equity, and Respect for Difference.
    [Show full text]