Financing Plan (In Us$)
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
PROJECT IDENTIFICATION FORM (PIF) PROJECT TYPE: FULL-SIZED PROJECT THE GEF TRUST FUND INDICATIVE CALENDAR Milestones Expected Dates Work Program (for FSP) April 2008 CEO Endorsement/Approval February 2009 GEF Agency Approval March 2009 Implementation Start May 2009 Mid-term Review (if planned) January 2011 Implementation Completion April 2012 Submission Date: 15 October 2007 Re-submission Date: PART I: PROJECT IDENTIFICATION GEFSEC PROJECT ID1: 3521 GEF AGENCY PROJECT ID: 3797 COUNTRY(IES): Russia, Mongolia PROJECT TITLE: Joint Actions to Reduce PTS and Nutrients Pollution in Lake Baikal through integrated basin management. GEF AGENCY(IES): UNDP OTHER EXECUTING PARTNER(S): UNOPS GEF FOCAL AREA (S): Full-sized ProjectInternational Waters GEF-4 STRATEGIC PROGRAM(S): SO-1, SP-4 NAME OF PARENT PROGRAM/UMBRELLA PROJECT: N/A A. PROJECT FRAMEWORK (Expand table as necessary) Project Objective: The development of a framework to reduce persistent toxic substances contamination and nutrient over- enrichment in the Baikal Lake Basin through a transboundary integrated water resource management regime. Indicate Indicative GEF Indicative Co- whether Expected Outcomes Expected Financing* financing* Total ($) Project Investme Outp ($) % ($) % Components nt, TA, uts or STA** 1. Transboundary TA Priority transboundary TDA; 300,000 35.3 550,000 64.7 850,000 diagnostic analysis issues, root and immediate Monitoring level (TDA) for BLB causes identified of PTS and nutrients releases at demonstration sites 2. Development and TA Multi-country agreement on Ministerially 232,000 34 450,000 66 682,000 endorsement of a legal, policy and institutional endorsed SAP; Strategic Action reforms to address priority IWRMP Programme (SAP) transboundary issues with including basin-wide the focus on reducing levels Integrated Water of PTS and nutrients. Resources Political and legal Management Plan commitments made to utilize 1 Project ID number will be assigned initially by GEFSEC. 1 PIF Template, August 30, 2007 (IWRMP) IWRM policies towards sustainable water use. 3. Strengthening the TA Institutions and reforms Effective 200,000 36.3 350,000 63.6 550,000 regional cooperation introduced to catalyze bilateral mechanisms between implementation of policies cooperation Russia and Mongolia for basin-scale IWRM. mechanism; Regional cooperation and data sharing on PTS and nutrients monitoring 4. Building TA National institutions in National 500,000 26.3 1,400,00 73,7 1,900,000 institutional capacities Russia and Mongolia are capacities for 0 for the national level equipped and committed to IWRM; SAP implementation implement SAP. National and promotion of Enforcement of IWRM capacities for integrated planning demonstrated by national monitoring PTS and management basin management agencies. and nutrients framework for BLB contamination; functioning interministerial national committees. 5. Demonstration of TA Reduction of nutrient and Nutrient 950,000 29.2 2,300,00 70.8 3,250,000 innovative IWRM PTS contamination from reduction demos, 0 techniques and land based sources in 4 sites. PTS reduction sustainable approaches Community partnerships demos, to BLB management demonstrated. Replication strategies 6. Public awareness, TA Stakeholders at all levels SAP 185,000 48 200,000 52 385,000 consultation and fully aware and involved in implementation coordination Lake Baikal IWRM. supported by a mechanisms for the Identification of best constituency of successful SAP practices and replicable stakeholders, implementation, lessons in effective and The Project capture and transfer of sustainable IWR would knowledge and best management that can be specifically aim practices captured and disseminated to deliver through IW:LEARN. pertinent Knowledge Products to the IW:LEARN 7. Project 263,000 30.8 590,000 69.2 853,000 management Total project costs 2,630,00 31 5,840,00 69 8,470,000 0 0 * List the $ by project components. The percentage is the share of GEF and Co-financing respectively to the total amount for the component. ** TA = Technical Assistance; STA = Scientific & technical analysis. B. INDICATIVE FINANCING PLAN SUMMARY FOR THE PROJECT ($) Project Preparation* Project Agency Fee Total GEF 120,000 2,630,000 275,000 3,025,000 Co-financing 140,000 5,840,000 5,980,000 Total 260,000 8,470,000 275,000 9,005,000 * Please include the previously approved PDFs and planned request for new PPG, if any. Indicate the amount already approved as footnote here and if the GEF funding is from GEF-3. C. INDICATIVE CO-FINANCING FOR THE PROJECT (including project preparation amount) BY SOURCE and BY NAME (in parenthesis) if available, ($) 2 PIF Template, August 30, 2007 Sources of Co-financing Type of Co-financing Amount Project Government Contribution Cash and in-kind 5,430,000 GEF Agency(ies) Cash and in-kind 200,000 Bilateral Aid Agency(ies) Multilateral Agency(ies) Private Sector Cash 200,000 NGO Cash 50,000 Others Unknown at this stage 100,000 Total co-financing 5,980,000 D. GEF RESOURCES REQUESTED BY FOCAL AREA(S), AGENCY (IES) SHARE AND COUNTRY(IES)* (in $) GEF Country Name/ Focal Area Agency Global Project Agency Preparation Project Fee Total UNDP International Waters Regional 120,000 2,630,000 275,000 3,025,000 Russia, Mongolia Total GEF Resources 120,000 2,630,000 275,000 3,025,000 * No need to provide information for this table if it is a single focal area, single country and single GEF Agency project. PART II: PROJECT JUSTIFICATION A. STATE THE ISSUE, HOW THE PROJECT SEEKS TO ADDRESS IT, AND THE EXPECTED GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL BENEFITS TO BE DELIVERED: Lake Baikal, situated in eastern Siberia on the Russian border with Mongolia, is the world’s oldest (>25 million years old) and deepest lake (1,637 m). It contains 20 percent of the Earth’s fresh surface water and supports a diverse and highly endemic flora and fauna. Although the lake is in Russia, the catchment around this vast freshwater reservoir (Baikal Lake Basin) is a transboundary resource extending over a 500,000 km2 area shared between Russia and Mongolia, with over 300 rivers and streams. Ongoing pressure to expand the economy in both countries is driving the largely uncontrolled expansion of industrial, agricultural and urban developments within the watershed on both sides of the lake. These developments have increased the number and types of inputs and the release of nutrients and persistent toxic substances. While the lake waters remain relatively clean (due to mixing and the sheer volume of the lake) localized contamination and eutrophication events have reportedly increased, particularly within certain heavily impacted areas. Continuation of this pressure on the watershed has serious implications for the local indigenous population and the wildlife supported by this once pristine lacustrine ecosystem. In recognition of their shared responsibility for this preservation of this globally important ecosystem, the countries have attempted to establish joint monitoring and management programmes. The intention of the proposed Project is to assist the countries to revitalize these agreements, harmonize policies and facilitate the establishment of an effective transboundary integrated water resource management regime to reduce land-based sources of contamination and ensure the sustainable use of this vast, ancient and unique fresh water reservoir for the benefit of future generations. The Baikal Lake Basin and the rich biological resources it hosts are of critical importance to both countries and to the indigenous peoples (Evenks and Buryats) whose origin and identity are highly connected with the lake. The lake supports more than 1,200 species of fauna and over 1,000 species of flora, 80 percent of which are endemic. Among these are the Baikal seal or Nerpa (Phoca sibirica) which is the only freshwater seal on earth, and a rare sub-species of the Omul fish (Coregonus autumnalis migratorius). In recognition of the global importance of the Baikal Lake Basin, the Selenga Delta, Lake Baikal’s largest wetland area, was added to the RAMSAR list of international wetlands in 1994, and the lake and the adjoining Russian territory were declared a UNESCO World Natural Heritage Site in 1996. However, alongside the rich biodiversity found within the Baikal Lake Basin, the region also has a wealth of commercially important mineral deposits (e.g. gold, coal, oil and gas, rare metals) and these form the basis of a highly intensive mining industry in both Russia and Mongolia, and the expansion of associated industrial and urban developments that presently threaten this fragile ecosystem. 3 PIF Template, August 30, 2007 Over the past decade mining activities around the lake have grown rapidly, particularly in Mongolia. The most heavily mined region is in the Selenga River Basin, in north-eastern Mongolia. The Selenga River is the main input to Lake Baikal responsible for almost one-half of Baikal's water supply. Contaminants related to the use of inefficient and outdated mining technologies (e.g. cyanide, mercury, cadmium, lead, zinc, fluorine, chloride) are released into the river and pose a serious threat to the lake ecosystem. Other land-based activities that threaten the watershed include: municipal and industrial waste water from the major conurbations, steel works and wood works and pulp and paper mills. The agricultural sector in the Basin has also expanded and this result in the diffuse release of a range of substances (pesticides, fertilizers, fuel and oil). Coal powered plants generate air-borne pollutants that enter the system via