Union Gov't Instructs Yangon Authorities to Prosecute Firebrand

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Union Gov't Instructs Yangon Authorities to Prosecute Firebrand Union Gov’t Instructs Yangon Authorities to Prosecute Firebrand Monk Page 1 of 5 Burma Union Gov’t Instructs Yangon Authorities to Prosecute Firebrand Monk U Wirathu addresses a pro-military rally in Yangon in October 2018. / Myo Min Soe / The Irrawaddy By THE IRRAWADDY 31 May 2019 YANGON—The government has ordered the Yangon regional government to prosecute ultranationalist Buddhist monk U Wirathu, according to Myanmar President’s Office spokesperson U Zaw Htay. Earlier this week Yangon Region Western District Court issued an arrest warrant against the monk, who is known for his anti-Muslim rhetoric. The warrant was issued after the chief of the General Administration Department’s district office, U San Min, filed a lawsuit accusing him of sedition under Article 124(a) of the Penal Code. The allegation stems from a speech U Wirathu made at an anti-constitutional amendment rally in Yangon on May 5, in which he attempted to incite disaffection with the government. https://www.irrawaddy.com/news/burma/union-govt-instructs-yangon-authorities-pro… 03/06/2019 Union Gov’t Instructs Yangon Authorities to Prosecute Firebrand Monk Page 2 of 5 Despite vowing to face arrest, the 50-year-old monk has been on the run since the warrant was issued. Police in Mandalay went to the monk’s monastery in Maha Aung Myay Township on Wednesday evening, but did not find him. On Friday, the President’s Office Spokesperson said the Yangon regional government was ordered by “the administration” to charge U Wirathu. “The prosecution was carried out by the regional government,” he said. When asked if the order came from the President’s Office or the Union government, the spokesperson declined to comment. Since Wednesday, the police have been combing Yangon in search of the monk. If he is prosecuted under the article, he faces seven to 20 years in prison, or a fine. His arrest will mark the government’s second legal move against U Wirathu. In 2017, he was banned from preaching for one year for his fiery sermons against Muslims. He has also been banned by Facebook for his anti-Muslim posts. Since the National League for Democracy (NLD) government came to power in 2016, the monk and other nationalists have staged pro-military campaigns across the country. They oppose the major constitutional amendments proposed by the NLD, though the changes are supported by a majority of the country’s population, who believe the current military-drafted charter is unfit for the democratic federal Union the country is transitioning to. At the same time, the nationalists praise the Myanmar military as the guardian of the country and of Buddhism, while condemning the West for its attempts to prosecute the military leadership on the Rohingya issue. Apart from his anti-Muslim sermons, U Wirathu has attracted public criticism recently for his fiery comments at a pro-military rally that the military-appointed representatives in Parliament “should be worshipped.” In another rally in southern Myanmar, the monk ridiculed the country’s de facto leader, Daw Aung San Suu Kyi, with personal and obscene comments. In Yangon, nationalist forces, including monks, held a rally at the Shwedagon Pagoda on Thursday and Friday to show solidarity with U Wirathu while condemning his prosecution as unfair. Asked about the latest development in U Wirathu’s case, the spokesperson said all necessary actions would be carried out “according to procedure.” https://www.irrawaddy.com/news/burma/union-govt-instructs-yangon-authorities-pro… 03/06/2019 Union Gov’t Instructs Yangon Authorities to Prosecute Firebrand Monk Page 3 of 5 Currently, he said, police and religious affairs officials are trying to clarify the procedure for prosecuting U Wirathu. Buddhist monks in Myanmar are solely supervised by the State Sangha [Clerical] Council known as the Sangha Maha Nayaka, which is chaired by the country’s senior and most influential monks. You may also like these stories: Yangon Police Search for Wanted Ultranationalist Monk Yangon Sangha Council Cancels Meeting with Firebrand Monk ‘I Will Face the Arrest’: U Wirathu Topics: Buddhism, Nationalism, Religion, sedition, U Wirathu The Irrawaddy ... Burma Myanmar Military Chief Pays Respects to Thai Statesman Gen. Prem https://www.irrawaddy.com/news/burma/union-govt-instructs-yangon-authorities-pro… 03/06/2019.
Recommended publications
  • USAID/BURMA MONTHLY ATMOSPHERIC REPORT: May 2019
    USAID/BURMA MONTHLY ATMOSPHERIC REPORT: May 2019 Contract Number: 72048218C00004 Myanmar Analytical Activity Acknowledgement This report has been written by Kimetrica LLC (www.kimetrica.com) and Mekong Economics (www.mekongeconomics.com) as part of the Myanmar Analytical Activity, and is therefore the exclusive property of the United States Agency for International Development (USAID). Melissa Earl (Kimetrica) is the author of this report and reachable at [email protected] or at Kimetrica LLC, 80 Garden Center, Suite A-368, Broomfield, CO 80020. The author’s views in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views of USAID or the United States Government. 1 MAY 2019 AT A GLANCE The Tatmadaw extended its unilateral ceasefire in northern and northeastern Myanmar to June 30. The announcement came just after the Tatmadaw met with Northern Alliance members. Most analysts believe the Tatmadaw extended the ceasefire to concentrate on fighting the Arakan Army in Rakhine State. (Page 1) Fighting between the Arakan Army and the Tatmadaw moved further south to Ann Township in Rakhine State. While investment in the state is concentrated in southern Rakhine, fighting in central Rakhine is worrisome for the Government’s plans for development in the state. (Pages 2-4) The Shan State Progress Party (SSPP) and the Restoration Council of Shan State agreed to stop fighting and pursue a peace agreement. (Pages 4-5) The USDP submitted four additional proposals to amend the constitution. The proposed amendments focus on decentralization and will likely be sent to the Constitutional Amendment Committee for review. (Pages 7-8) Three agreements were signed by the Myanmar and Chinese governments following Aung San Suu Kyi’s attendance of the Belt and Road Initiative Forum in Beijing last month.
    [Show full text]
  • Hate Speech Ignited Understanding Hate Speech in Myanmar
    Hate Speech Ignited Understanding Hate Speech in Myanmar Hate Speech Ignited Understanding Hate Speech in Myanmar October 2020 About Us This report was written based on the information and data collection, monitoring, analytical insights and experiences with hate speech by civil society organizations working to reduce and/or directly af- fected by hate speech. The research for the report was coordinated by Burma Monitor (Research and Monitoring) and Progressive Voice and written with the assistance of the International Human Rights Clinic at Harvard Law School while it is co-authored by a total 19 organizations. Jointly published by: 1. Action Committee for Democracy Development 2. Athan (Freedom of Expression Activist Organization) 3. Burma Monitor (Research and Monitoring) 4. Generation Wave 5. International Human Rights Clinic at Harvard Law School 6. Kachin Women’s Association Thailand 7. Karen Human Rights Group 8. Mandalay Community Center 9. Myanmar Cultural Research Society 10. Myanmar People Alliance (Shan State) 11. Nyan Lynn Thit Analytica 12. Olive Organization 13. Pace on Peaceful Pluralism 14. Pon Yate 15. Progressive Voice 16. Reliable Organization 17. Synergy - Social Harmony Organization 18. Ta’ang Women’s Organization 19. Thint Myat Lo Thu Myar (Peace Seekers and Multiculturalist Movement) Contact Information Progressive Voice [email protected] www.progressivevoicemyanmar.org Burma Monitor [email protected] International Human Rights Clinic at Harvard Law School [email protected] https://hrp.law.harvard.edu Acknowledgments Firstly and most importantly, we would like to express our deepest appreciation to the activists, human rights defenders, civil society organizations, and commu- nity-based organizations that provided their valuable time, information, data, in- sights, and analysis for this report.
    [Show full text]
  • B U R M a B U L L E T
    B U R M A B U L L E T I N A month-in-review of events in Burma A L T E R N A T I V E A S E A N N E T W O R K O N B U R M A campaigns, advocacy & capacity - building for human rights & democracy Issue 130 October 2017 OHCHR report confirms that the Tatmadaw IN THIS ISSUE committed well-organized, coordinated and systematic attacks against Rohingya. UN: ATTACKS ON ROHINGYA “WELL- ORGANISED AND COORDINATED” Medical staff corroborate evidence of 3.603,000 refugees: deprivation, drownings widespread rape and sexual violence against 4.Trapped in Arakan State Rohingya women and girls as young as 5. 4.Government takes new steps Rohingya villagers trapped in Arakan state told 5.Yes to repatriation, no to return of land to accept national verification cards that deny 5.International actions their identity or "face actions”. HUMAN RIGHTS 6 Arakan activist sentenced for documenting Over 603,000 Rohingya are estimated to have military abuses, 2 Kachin priests convicted of fled into Bangladesh as of 31 October. ‘supporting rebels’ Bangladesh plans to build refugee camp for 7 Update on the detention of journalists 800,000 people. 7.Kachin IDP land granted to government, KIA and BGF officials President’s Office spokesperson Zaw Htay says ETHNIC AFFAIRS AND CONFLICT that Rohingya refugees “are plotting against the 7.Child killed as fighting continues in government by misleading [the international northern Shan State community] that there is a mass migration”. 8.Second anniversary of the NCA’s signing Burma and Bangladesh reach agreement on 8.Other NCA updates Rohingya; Burma will take back refugees if they HUMANITARIAN have evidence of previous residence in Burma.
    [Show full text]
  • Myanmar Update August 2018 Report
    STATUS OF HUMAN RIGHTS & SANCTIONS IN MYANMAR AUGUST 2018 REPORT Summary. This report reviews the August 2018 developments relating to human rights in Myanmar. Relatedly, it addresses the interchange between Myanmar’s reform efforts and the responses of the international community. I. Political Developments......................................................................................................2 A. Rohingya Refugee Crisis................................................................................................2 B. Corruption.......................................................................................................................3 C. International Community / Sanctions...........................................................................4 II. Civil and Political Rights...................................................................................................5 A. Freedom of Speech, Assembly and Association............................................................5 B. Freedom of the Press and Censorship...........................................................................7 III. Economic Development.....................................................................................................8 A. Economic Development—Legal Framework, Foreign Investment............................8 B. Economic Development—Infrastructure, Major Projects..........................................8 IV. Peace Talks and Ethnic Violence....................................................................................11
    [Show full text]
  • AUGUST CHRONOLOGY 2018 ACRONYMS June
    June AUGUST CHRONOLOGY 2018 Summary of the Karreni Youth Activist faces trial from inside prison for Aung San Current Situation: statue protest 273 individuals are oppressed in Burma due to political activity: 19 political prisoners are serving sentences, 53 are awaiting trial inside prison, Accessed August 2018 © Union of Karreni State Youth 201 are awaiting trial outside prison. WEBSITE | TWITTER | FACEBOOK ACRONYMS AUGUST 2018 1 ABFSU All Burma Federation of Student Unions CAT Conservation Alliance Tanawthari CNPC China National Petroleum Corporation EAO Ethnic Armed Organization GEF Global Environment Facility ICRC International Committee of the Red Cross IDP Internally Displaced Person KHRG Karen Human Rights Group KIA Kachin Independence Army KNU Karen National Union MFU Myanmar Farmers’ Union MNHRC Myanmar National Human Rights Commission MOGE Myanmar Oil and Gas Enterprise NLD National League for Democracy NNC Naga National Council PAPPL Peaceful Assembly and Peaceful Procession Law RCSS Restoration Council of Shan State RCSS/SSA Restoration Council of Shan State/Shan State Army – South SHRF Shan Human Rights Foundation TNLA Ta’ang National Liberation Army YUSU Yangon University Students’ Union TABLE OF CONTENTS AUGUST 2018 2 POLITICAL PRISONERS .................................................................. 4 CHARGES ............................................................................................................................................ 4 ARRESTS ...........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Monthly Chronology of Burma Political Prisoners for March 2009
    Chronology of Political Prisoners in Burma for March 2009 Summary of current situation There are a total of 2,146 political prisoners in Burma. 1 These include: CATEGORY NUMBER Monks 220 Members of Parliament 15 Students 2722 Women 18 7 NLD members 458 Members of the Human Rights Defenders and Promoters 43 network Ethnic nationalities 203 Cyclone Nargis volunteers 21 Teachers 26 Media a ctivists 46 Lawyers 12 In poor health 113 Since the protests in August 2007 leading to last September’s Saffron Revolution, a total of 1,070 activists have been arrested and are still in detention. Monthly trend analysis During the month of March 2009, at least 22 arrested and still detained, 42 250 sentenced and 11 transferred, 7 released, 200 and 8 in bad health show the Burmese 150 Arrested regime continues to inflict human rights 100 Sentenced abuses. The UN Working Group on 50 Released Arbitrary Detention issued an opinion 0 S N Jan- Ma report which declared the detention of ep- ov- 09 r- Daw Aung San Su Kyi to be illegal and 08 08 09 in violation of the regime’s own laws. This is the first time the UNWG AD has declared that it violates the regime’s own laws. The UN Working Group on Arbitrary Detention also ruled that the imprisonment of Min Ko Naing, Pyone Cho, Ko Jimmy and Min Zayar violates minimum standards of international Flaw. The Special Rapporteur on Human Rights in Burma released his report following his visit in February. The report recommendations call for the progressive release of all political prisoners.
    [Show full text]
  • Asymmetric Bargaining Between Myanmar and China in the Myitsone Dam Controversy: Social Opposition As David’S Stone Against Goliath Sze Wan Debby CHAN 1
    Asymmetric Bargaining between Myanmar and China in the Myitsone Dam Controversy: Social Opposition as David’s Stone against Goliath Sze Wan Debby CHAN 1 In May 2011, the Sino-Myanmar relations was elevated to a ‘comprehensive strategic cooperative partnership’. Soon after that, the unilateral suspension the China-backed Myitsone Dam by President Thein Sein has redefined the bilateral ties. What made Myanmar renege on its commitment which could entail innumerable compensation? This research employs the two-level game theory in analysing the Myitsone Dam controversy. Based on dozens of interviews conducted in Myanmar, I argue that the halt of the project was not entirely a voluntary defection of the Myanmar government. Amid democratisation in the country, the ‘Save the Ayeyarwady’ campaign against the dam was able to galvanise nationwide support through a series of awareness raising activities in 2011. With the rise of audience cost in Myanmar, China gradually conceded that the quasi-civilian government could no longer ignore societal actors in relation to foreign investment projects. Since 2012, China has been actively engaging with the opposition and civil society organisations in Myanmar. China’s new diplomatic approach reflects the importance of social opposition in the international dispute. The Myitsone Dam case may have a wider application of using social opposition as bargaining resources in asymmetric international negotiations outside the China-Myanmar context. Introduction In face of the popular ‘Save the Ayeyarwady’ campaign against the construction of the China- backed Myitsone hydropower dam, then Myanmar’s 2 President Thein Sein suspended the project during his tenure on 30 September 2011.
    [Show full text]
  • Political Monitor No.11
    Euro-Burma Office 15 to 21 April 2012 Political Monitor POLITICAL MONITOR NO. 11 OFFICIAL MEDIA PRESIDENT MAKES OFFICIAL VISIT TO JAPAN President Thein Sein arrived in Tokyo on 19 April to attend the 4th Japan-Mekong Summit and for a goodwill visit to Japan.1 The President met Japan’s Prime Minister Yoshihiko Noda for a Japan – Myanmar summit meeting on 21 April and discussed a range of bilateral and regional issues. PM Noda welcomed the measures taken by the Burmese leader towards democratization and working to achieve national reconciliation with the ethnic groups. He also praised his counterpart for successfully holding the 1 April by-elections well as the various political and economic reforms being undertaken in Burma and expressed Japan’s commitment in continuing to support these efforts. PM Noda announced that the Government of Japan reviewed its assistance policy toward Burma and to restart new ODA loans for the sustainable economic development in Burma. The key areas in which Japan would provide economic cooperation would be focussed on improvement of people's livelihood (including assistance for ethnic minorities and poverty groups as well as agricultural and rural development), capacity building, development of systems and institutions to sustain economy and society (including those for promotion of democratization), and development of infrastructure and related systems necessary for the sustainable economic development". The Burmese President welcomed the commitment and support of the Japanese government and expressed his strong
    [Show full text]
  • Myanmar's Investigative Commissions
    Myanmar’s Investigative Commissions: A History of Shielding Abusers September 2018 As the United Nations Human Rights Council debates steps to provide accountability for grave human rights abuses in Myanmar, it is crucial to recognize that the Myanmar government has a long history of creating mechanisms that aimed to dilute or deflect international calls for action rather than to prosecute those responsible. Since violence broke out in Rakhine State in 2012, successive governments have created no fewer than eight commissions to investigate the violence in the state or to make recommendations for resolving the crisis. Not one of them could be considered credible or impartial, and none have led to more than token accountability for serious crimes against the ethnic Rohingya minority. For there to be any chance of genuine accountability for what Human Rights Watch and others have found to be crimes against humanity, and the Independent International Fact-Finding Mission on Myanmar called possible genocide, this historical record of failed domestic commissions makes clear that the international community cannot rely on mechanisms created by the Myanmar government. Whether or not the UN Security Council refers the situation in Myanmar to the International Criminal Court (ICC) or the ICC acts on its own, the need to preserve evidence of serious crimes across Myanmar that could one day be used in prosecutions is urgent. It is critical that the Human Rights Council establish an independent international mechanism to collect, consolidate, preserve, and analyze evidence of serious international crimes and international law violations committed in Myanmar and to prepare files to facilitate and expedite fair and independent criminal proceedings in accordance with international legal standards.
    [Show full text]
  • Myanmar's Presidential Transition
    ISSUE: 2016 NO. 6 ISSN 2335-6677 RESEARCHERS AT ISEAS – YUSOF ISHAK INSTITUTE SHARE THEIR UNDERSTANDING OF CURRENT EVENTS Singapore | 15 February 2016 Myanmar’s Presidential Transition: There May (or May Not) Be Trouble Ahead By Robert Taylor* EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Now that Myanmar has a free press, many rumours are spread via the international media. The latest spate is over whether or not there is a move afoot to name as president, Daw Aung San Suu Kyi, the leader of the victorious National League for Democracy (NLD) in last November’s election, as she and her supporters wish. Under Clause 59(f), she is ineligible for the role because of her two sons’ foreign nationality. Army sources have insisted that this cannot be changed, at least for now, if not for ever. However, persons in and close to the NLD still insist that there is a way to nominate Daw Aung San Suu Kyi as president on 17 March so that she can take up the post on 1 April. It is alleged that negotiations between the NLD and the army are underway to that effect. Others deny this to be the case. The rumours may just be rumours, and wrong at that. However, if some of them are true, a constitutional crisis could be looming. Only Daw Aung San Suu Kyi and the Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces, Senior General Min Aung Hlaing, would know for certain. 1 ISSUE: 2016 NO. 6 ISSN 2335-6677 The NLD has in the past refused to accept army conditions such as those in the current constitution, but in more recent years has accepted grudgingly the army’s terms for power.
    [Show full text]
  • Myanmar's Annihilation of the Rohingya
    GENOCIDE ACHIEVED, GENOCIDE CONTINUES: MYANMAR’S ANNIHILATION OF THE ROHINGYA ANNIHILATION MYANMAR’S GENOCIDE CONTINUES: GENOCIDE ACHIEVED, Pen ny Green / Thomas MacManus / Alicia de la Cour Venning de la Cour / Thomas MacManus Alicia Green ny Published by: International State Crime Initiative School of Law Queen Mary University of London GENOCIDE ACHIEVED, GENOCIDE CONTINUES: MYANMAR’S ANNIHILATION OF THE ROHINGYA Penny Green / Thomas MacManus / Alicia de la Cour Venning School of Law (CC) International State Crime Initiative 2018 This publication is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial‐ NoDerivatives 4.0 International license: you may copy and distribute the document, only in its entirety, as long as it is attributed to the authors and used for non‐commercial, educational, or public policy purposes. ISBN: 978‐0‐9934574‐6‐3 (Paperback) and 978‐0‐9934574‐7‐0 (eBook‐PDF) Published by: International State Crime Initiative School of Law Queen Mary University of London Mile End Road London E1 4NS United Kingdom www.statecrime.org Authors: Professor Penny Green, Queen Mary University of London Dr Thomas MacManus, Queen Mary University of London Alicia de la Cour Venning, Queen Mary University of London Recommended citation: Green, P., MacManus, T. and de la Cour Venning, A. (2018) Genocide Achieved, Genocide Continues: Myanmar’s Annihilation of the Rohingya. London: International State Crime Initiative. All photographs, unless otherwise stated, taken by ISCI researchers. Front page image: A group of Rohingya refugees, who had recently arrived in the Bangladesh camp of Kutupalong, waiting for humanitarian assistance, October 2017 Layout and design: Paul Jacobs, QMUL CopyShop Printing: QMUL CopyShop School of Law GENOCIDE ACHIEVED, GENOCIDE CONTINUES: MYANMAR’S ANNIHILATION OF THE ROHINGYA Penny Green / Thomas MacManus / Alicia de la Cour Venning CONTENTS MAPS 5 TIMELINE OF GENOCIDE 7 ABBREVIATIONS 9 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 11 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 13 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Special Report No
    SPECIAL REPORT NO. 486 | NOVEMBER 2020 UNITED STATES INSTITUTE OF PEACE www.usip.org The Arakan Army in Myanmar: Deadly Conflict Rises in Rakhine State By David Scott Mathieson Contents Introduction: A Deadly Conflict Rises in Rakhine State .................3 Background and Rise of the Arakan Army ......................4 The Nature of Arakan Army Warfare and Strategy ...................7 Attitudes toward Rohingya and Muslim Minorities ................ 15 Conclusions and Recommendations ...................... 17 Kyaw Han, general secretary of United League of Arakan/Arakan Army, attends a March 2019 meeting with government, military, and ethnic armed organizations. (Photo by Aung Shine Oo/AP) Summary • Myanmar’s most serious conflict Tatmadaw and compounding the narrowing possibilities for political in many decades has emerged human and physical damage. solutions. This conflict will continue in Rakhine State between the • The AA’s sophisticated communi- to escalate absent the AA’s inclu- Myanmar armed forces (Tatmad- cations strategies use social me- sion in the peace process, send- aw) and the Arakan Army (AA), de- dia to swell its recruitment base, ing Rakhine State into a downward manding self-determination for the build civilian support, trade insults spiral that could seriously damage Buddhist Rakhine ethnic minority. It with the Tatmadaw, and reach an the rest of the country. leaves Rohingya refugees with lit- international audience. • With strategic investments to pro- tle chance of a safe return. • Government efforts to marginalize tect in Rakhine’s Kyaukphyu port, • The AA’s guerrilla tactics have and demonize the AA are counter- influence on other armed groups, caused many military and civil- productive with the Rakhine pop- and an interest in the peace pro- ian casualties, evoking a typically ulation, hardening attitudes and cess, China is the only external fierce armed response from the player that can influence the AA.
    [Show full text]