Chapter 2 Analysis of Existing Geologic Information
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Do Gssps Render Dual Time-Rock/Time Classification and Nomenclature Redundant?
Do GSSPs render dual time-rock/time classification and nomenclature redundant? Ismael Ferrusquía-Villafranca1 Robert M. Easton2 and Donald E. Owen3 1Instituto de Geología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Ciudad Universitaria, Coyoacán, México, DF, MEX, 45100, e-mail: [email protected] 2Ontario Geological Survey, Precambrian Geoscience Section, 933 Ramsey Lake Road, B7064 Sudbury, Ontario P3E 6B5, e-mail: [email protected] 3Department of Geology, Lamar University, Beaumont, Texas 77710, e-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT: The Geological Society of London Proposal for “…ending the distinction between the dual stratigraphic terminology of time-rock units (of chronostratigraphy) and geologic time units (of geochronology). The long held, but widely misunderstood distinc- tion between these two essentially parallel time scales has been rendered unnecessary by the adoption of the global stratotype sections and points (GSSP-golden spike) principle in defining intervals of geologic time within rock strata.” Our review of stratigraphic princi- ples, concepts, models and paradigms through history clearly shows that the GSL Proposal is flawed and if adopted will be of disservice to the stratigraphic community. We recommend the continued use of the dual stratigraphic terminology of chronostratigraphy and geochronology for the following reasons: (1) time-rock (chronostratigraphic) and geologic time (geochronologic) units are conceptually different; (2) the subtended time-rock’s unit space between its “golden spiked-marked” -
The Rio Ca~Ete Basin : Central Coastal Ranges of Peru
Third ISAG, St Malo (France), 17-1 9/91]996 STRATIGRAPHY, SEDIMENTOLOGY AND TECTONIC EVOLUTION OF THE RIO CA~ETEBASIN : CENTRAL COASTAL RANGES OF PERU Antenor M. Aleman Amoco Production CO Houston, Texas 77293 KEY WORDS: Lima stratigraphy, frontal arc, arc extension. Central Coastal Ranges evolution. ABSTRACT The Rio Caiiete Basin in the Central Coastal Ranges of Peru (C.C.R.P.) represents a fault-bounded frontal-arc Late Jurasic (Tithonian) to Albian sequence formed by aborted intra-arc spreading process during the early evolution of the Andes (Fig.1). The sequence, exposed in the Lima area, consists of more than 6000 meters of volcaniclastic sedimentary rocks, lava flows, lime mudstones, shales, quartz rich sandstones and subordinated fossiliferous limestones and evaporites. The stratigraphy records several episodes of volcanism and extension along and across the basin and provides new insight in the evolution and crustal growth of the Central Andes. INTRODUCTION Four widespread groups and one areally restricted formation mark important stages in the stratigraphic, sediimentologic and tectonic evolution of the Rio Caiiete Basin. The Puente Piedra Group consists of volcaniclastic debris, basaltic to andesitic lava flows, shales and subordinate limestones that document the presence of a Jurassic volcanic arc (Fig.2). The overlying quartz rich sandstones and shales of the Morro Solar Group (fig.3) records an abrupt change in sedimentation and tectonic style. Ensialic extension accompanied by subsidence of the volcanic arc and concomitant uplift of the Paleozoic (o Precambrian "Coastal Cordillera" (Paracas Block) explains the change of source and provenance. The areally restricted Pucusana Formation (Fig.4), made up of alkaline lavas, volcanic breccias and lapillistones, is interpreted (o represent a localized volcanic center perhaps related to subduction of oceanic fractures. -
Mineralogy and Geochemistry of Carbonaceous Mudstone As a Vector to Ore: a Case Study at the Lagunas Norte High-Sulfidation Gold Deposit, Peru
MINERALOGY AND GEOCHEMISTRY OF CARBONACEOUS MUDSTONE AS A VECTOR TO ORE: A CASE STUDY AT THE LAGUNAS NORTE HIGH-SULFIDATION GOLD DEPOSIT, PERU by Harry Hanneman A thesis submitted to the Faculty and Board of Trustees of the Colorado School of Mines in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science (Geology). Golden, Colorado Date ________________ Signed: ________________________ Harry Hanneman Signed: ________________________ Dr. Thomas Monecke Thesis Advisor Golden, Colorado Date ________________ Signed: ________________________ Dr. Paul Santi Professor and Head Department of Geology and Geological Engineering ii ABSTRACT The Lagunas Norte Au deposit in the Alto Chicama district of Peru is a ~14 Moz high- sulfidation epithermal deposit that is hosted by an atypical host-rock succession for this deposit type. Approximately 80% of the ore body is contained in the Lower Cretaceous Chimu Formation, which is composed of quartz arenite with interbedded carbonaceous mudstone, siltstone, and coal seams. The remainder of the ore is hosted by the Miocene volcanic rocks of the Calipuy Group, forming an irregular and thin veneer on the deformed sedimentary rocks of the basement. The host rock succession of the Lagunas Norte deposit has been affected by widespread hydrothermal alteration. The alteration is cryptic within most of sedimentary rocks as the quartz arenite was largely inert to alteration by the strongly acidic fluids. Vuggy textures associated with residual quartz alteration can only be recognized in the overlying Miocene volcanic rocks. However, the present study shows that mudstone of the Chimu Formation records acid-type alteration due to its originally high clay mineral content. -
International Chronostratigraphic Chart
INTERNATIONAL CHRONOSTRATIGRAPHIC CHART www.stratigraphy.org International Commission on Stratigraphy v 2015/01 numerical numerical numerical Eonothem numerical Series / Epoch Stage / Age Series / Epoch Stage / Age Series / Epoch Stage / Age Erathem / Era System / Period GSSP GSSP age (Ma) GSSP GSSA EonothemErathem / Eon System / Era / Period EonothemErathem / Eon System/ Era / Period age (Ma) EonothemErathem / Eon System/ Era / Period age (Ma) / Eon GSSP age (Ma) present ~ 145.0 358.9 ± 0.4 ~ 541.0 ±1.0 Holocene Ediacaran 0.0117 Tithonian Upper 152.1 ±0.9 Famennian ~ 635 0.126 Upper Kimmeridgian Neo- Cryogenian Middle 157.3 ±1.0 Upper proterozoic ~ 720 Pleistocene 0.781 372.2 ±1.6 Calabrian Oxfordian Tonian 1.80 163.5 ±1.0 Frasnian 1000 Callovian 166.1 ±1.2 Quaternary Gelasian 2.58 382.7 ±1.6 Stenian Bathonian 168.3 ±1.3 Piacenzian Middle Bajocian Givetian 1200 Pliocene 3.600 170.3 ±1.4 Middle 387.7 ±0.8 Meso- Zanclean Aalenian proterozoic Ectasian 5.333 174.1 ±1.0 Eifelian 1400 Messinian Jurassic 393.3 ±1.2 7.246 Toarcian Calymmian Tortonian 182.7 ±0.7 Emsian 1600 11.63 Pliensbachian Statherian Lower 407.6 ±2.6 Serravallian 13.82 190.8 ±1.0 Lower 1800 Miocene Pragian 410.8 ±2.8 Langhian Sinemurian Proterozoic Neogene 15.97 Orosirian 199.3 ±0.3 Lochkovian Paleo- Hettangian 2050 Burdigalian 201.3 ±0.2 419.2 ±3.2 proterozoic 20.44 Mesozoic Rhaetian Pridoli Rhyacian Aquitanian 423.0 ±2.3 23.03 ~ 208.5 Ludfordian 2300 Cenozoic Chattian Ludlow 425.6 ±0.9 Siderian 28.1 Gorstian Oligocene Upper Norian 427.4 ±0.5 2500 Rupelian Wenlock Homerian -
Measurement of Radon in Soils of Lima City - Peru During the Period 2016-2017
EARTH SCIENCES RESEARCH JOURNAL Earth Sci. Res. J. Vol. 23, No. 3 (September, 2019): 171-183 ENVIRONMENTAL GEOLOGY ENVIRONMENTAL Measurement of radon in soils of Lima City - Peru during the period 2016-2017 Lázaro Luís Vilcapoma1, María Elena López Herrera1, Patrizia Pereyra1, Daniel Francisco Palacios1, Bertin Pérez1, Jhonny Rojas1, Laszlo Sajo-Bohus2 1Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú, Lima, Peru 2Universidad Simón Bolívar, Caracas, Venezuela * Corresponding author: [email protected] ABSTRACT Keywords: soil gas radon; emanation; Lima; LR- Lima City is situated on alluvial fan deposits of rivers flowing through geological formations that contain different 115 detector; Niño Costero; river floods; alluvial levels of uranium. In this paper, a study is made on the average spatial and temporal behavior of radon gas in soils of deposits; igneous rocks. Lima City. Radon concentration was determined using the LR-115 type 2 track detector during 36 periods, of 14 days each, in twenty holes distributed in the fifteen districts of Lima City. Radon concentration in soil pores ranged from 0.1 to 64.3 kBq/m3 with an average value of 5.6 kBq/m3. The average radon concentration in soil gas was about two times lower in winter than in the other seasons. High radon values during October/November 2017 were related to the earthquakes perceived in Lima City in that period. The highest radon concentrations were found in areas of alluvial deposits whose parental material has been removed from the Quilmaná and Huarangal volcanics by the Chillón and Huaycoloro Rivers. Soil gas radon concentrations were even higher in areas closer to volcanic and less distant from rivers. -
Geologic Time – Part I - Practice Questions and Answers Revised October 2007
Geologic Time – Part I - Practice Questions and Answers Revised October 2007 1. The study of the spatial and temporal relationships between bodies of rock is called ____________________. 2. The geological time scale is the ____________ framework in which geologists view Earth history. 3. Both _________________ and absolute scales are included in the geological time scale. 4. Beds represent a depositional event. They are _________ 1 cm in thickness. 5. Laminations are similar to beds but are ___________ 1 cm in thickness. 6. The idea that most beds are laid down horizontally or nearly so is called the (a) Principle of Original Continuity (b) Principle of Fossil Succession (c) Principle of Cross-Cutting Relationships (d) Principle of Original Horizontality (e) Principle of Superposition 7. The idea that beds extend laterally in three dimensions until they thin to zero thickness is called the (a) Principle of Cross-Cutting Relationships (b) Principle of Original Horizontality (c) Principle of Original Continuity (d) Principle of Fossil Succession (e) Principle of Superposition 8. The idea that younger beds are deposited on top of older beds is called the (a) Principle of Original Horizontality (b) Principle of Fossil Succession (c) Principle of Cross-Cutting Relationships (d) Principle of Original Continuity (e) Principle of Superposition 9. The idea that a dike transecting bedding must be younger than the bedding it crosses is called the (a) Principle of Original Horizontality (b) Principle of Original Continuity (c) Principle of Fossil Succession (d) Principle of Cross-Cutting Relationships (e) Principle of Superposition 10. The idea that fossil content will change upward within a formation is called the (a) Principle of Cross-Cutting Relationships (b) Principle of Original Horizontality (c) Principle of Fossil Succession (d) Principle of Original Continuity (e) Principle of Superposition 11. -
Wray Wind Energy Project Environmental Assessment for Pre-Approval Review DOE/EA - 1884
Wray Wind Energy Project Environmental Assessment For Pre-Approval Review DOE/EA - 1884 Yuma County, Colorado U. S. Department of Energy Western Area Power Administration February 2012 Wray Wind Energy Project Environmental Assessment For Pre-Approval Review DOE/EA - 1884 Yuma County, Colorado U. S. Department of Energy Western Area Power Administration February 2012 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY BLANK Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................. 1-1 1.1 BACKGROUND ................................................................................................................................. 1.1-1 1.2 PURPOSE AND NEED ........................................................................................................................ 1.2-1 1.2.1 Invenergy’s Purpose and Need .............................................................................................. 1.2-1 1.2.2 Western’s Purpose and Need ................................................................................................. 1.2-1 1.3 FEDERAL ENVIRONMENTAL PROCESS AND DECISIONS TO BE MADE ............................................... 1.3-2 1.4 PUBLIC PARTICIPATION ................................................................................................................... 1.4-2 1.5 OTHER AUTHORIZATIONS ................................................................................................................ 1.5-3 2.0 DESCRIPTION -
PHANEROZOIC and PRECAMBRIAN CHRONOSTRATIGRAPHY 2016
PHANEROZOIC and PRECAMBRIAN CHRONOSTRATIGRAPHY 2016 Series/ Age Series/ Age Erathem/ System/ Age Epoch Stage/Age Ma Epoch Stage/Age Ma Era Period Ma GSSP/ GSSA GSSP GSSP Eonothem Eon Eonothem Erathem Period Eonothem Period Eon Era System System Eon Erathem Era 237.0 541 Anthropocene * Ladinian Ediacaran Middle 241.5 Neo- 635 Upper Anisian Cryogenian 4.2 ka 246.8 proterozoic 720 Holocene Middle Olenekian Tonian 8.2 ka Triassic Lower 249.8 1000 Lower Mesozoic Induan Stenian 11.8 ka 251.9 Meso- 1200 Upper Changhsingian Ectasian 126 ka Lopingian 254.2 proterozoic 1400 “Ionian” Wuchiapingian Calymmian Quaternary Pleisto- 773 ka 259.8 1600 cene Calabrian Capitanian Statherian 1.80 Guada- 265.1 Proterozoic 1800 Gelasian Wordian Paleo- Orosirian 2.58 lupian 268.8 2050 Piacenzian Roadian proterozoic Rhyacian Pliocene 3.60 272.3 2300 Zanclean Kungurian Siderian 5.33 Permian 282.0 2500 Messinian Artinskian Neo- 7.25 Cisuralian 290.1 Tortonian Sakmarian archean 11.63 295.0 2800 Serravallian Asselian Meso- Miocene 13.82 298.9 r e c a m b i n P Neogene Langhian Gzhelian archean 15.97 Upper 303.4 3200 Burdigalian Kasimovian Paleo- C e n o z i c 20.44 306.7 Archean archean Aquitanian Penn- Middle Moscovian 23.03 sylvanian 314.6 3600 Chattian Lower Bashkirian Oligocene 28.1 323.2 Eoarchean Rupelian Upper Serpukhovian 33.9 330.9 4000 Priabonian Middle Visean 38.0 Carboniferous 346.7 Hadean (informal) Missis- Bartonian sippian Lower Tournaisian Eocene 41.0 358.9 ~4560 Lutetian Famennian 47.8 Upper 372.2 Ypresian Frasnian Units of the international Paleogene 56.0 382.7 Thanetian Givetian chronostratigraphic scale with 59.2 Middle 387.7 Paleocene Selandian Eifelian estimated numerical ages. -
Article Reference
Article Formation of intra-arc volcanosedimentary basins in the western flank of the central Peruvian Andes during Late Cretaceous oblique subduction: field evidence and constraints from U-Pb ages and Hf isotopes POLLIAND, Marc, et al. Reference POLLIAND, Marc, et al. Formation of intra-arc volcanosedimentary basins in the western flank of the central Peruvian Andes during Late Cretaceous oblique subduction: field evidence and constraints from U-Pb ages and Hf isotopes. International Journal of Earth Sciences, 2005, vol. 94, no. 2, p. 231-242 DOI : 10.1007/s00531-005-0464-5 Available at: http://archive-ouverte.unige.ch/unige:21629 Disclaimer: layout of this document may differ from the published version. 1 / 1 Int J Earth Sci (Geol Rundsch) (2005) 94: 231–242 DOI 10.1007/s00531-005-0464-5 ORIGINAL PAPER Marc Polliand Æ Urs Schaltegger Æ Martin Frank Lluis Fontbote´ Formation of intra-arc volcanosedimentary basins in the western flank of the central Peruvian Andes during Late Cretaceous oblique subduction: field evidence and constraints from U–Pb ages and Hf isotopes Received: 16 October 2003 / Accepted: 11 December 2004 / Published online: 16 February 2005 Ó Springer-Verlag 2005 Abstract During late Early to Late Cretaceous, the of old basement below the WPT, in agreement with Peruvian coastal margin underwent fast and oblique previous U–Pb and Sr isotopic data for batholithic rocks subduction and was characterized by important arc emplaced in the WPT area. This is supported by the plutonism (the Peruvian Coastal Batholith) and forma- presence of a most likely continuous block of dense tion of volcanosedimentary basins known as the Wes- (3.0 g/cm3) material observed beneath the WPT area tern Peruvian Trough (WPT). -
International Chronostratigraphic Chart
INTERNATIONAL CHRONOSTRATIGRAPHIC CHART www.stratigraphy.org International Commission on Stratigraphy v 2014/02 numerical numerical numerical Eonothem numerical Series / Epoch Stage / Age Series / Epoch Stage / Age Series / Epoch Stage / Age Erathem / Era System / Period GSSP GSSP age (Ma) GSSP GSSA EonothemErathem / Eon System / Era / Period EonothemErathem / Eon System/ Era / Period age (Ma) EonothemErathem / Eon System/ Era / Period age (Ma) / Eon GSSP age (Ma) present ~ 145.0 358.9 ± 0.4 ~ 541.0 ±1.0 Holocene Ediacaran 0.0117 Tithonian Upper 152.1 ±0.9 Famennian ~ 635 0.126 Upper Kimmeridgian Neo- Cryogenian Middle 157.3 ±1.0 Upper proterozoic Pleistocene 0.781 372.2 ±1.6 850 Calabrian Oxfordian Tonian 1.80 163.5 ±1.0 Frasnian 1000 Callovian 166.1 ±1.2 Quaternary Gelasian 2.58 382.7 ±1.6 Stenian Bathonian 168.3 ±1.3 Piacenzian Middle Bajocian Givetian 1200 Pliocene 3.600 170.3 ±1.4 Middle 387.7 ±0.8 Meso- Zanclean Aalenian proterozoic Ectasian 5.333 174.1 ±1.0 Eifelian 1400 Messinian Jurassic 393.3 ±1.2 7.246 Toarcian Calymmian Tortonian 182.7 ±0.7 Emsian 1600 11.62 Pliensbachian Statherian Lower 407.6 ±2.6 Serravallian 13.82 190.8 ±1.0 Lower 1800 Miocene Pragian 410.8 ±2.8 Langhian Sinemurian Proterozoic Neogene 15.97 Orosirian 199.3 ±0.3 Lochkovian Paleo- Hettangian 2050 Burdigalian 201.3 ±0.2 419.2 ±3.2 proterozoic 20.44 Mesozoic Rhaetian Pridoli Rhyacian Aquitanian 423.0 ±2.3 23.03 ~ 208.5 Ludfordian 2300 Cenozoic Chattian Ludlow 425.6 ±0.9 Siderian 28.1 Gorstian Oligocene Upper Norian 427.4 ±0.5 2500 Rupelian Wenlock Homerian -
North American Stratigraphic Code1
NORTH AMERICAN STRATIGRAPHIC CODE1 North American Commission on Stratigraphic Nomenclature FOREWORD TO THE REVISED EDITION FOREWORD TO THE 1983 CODE By design, the North American Stratigraphic Code is The 1983 Code of recommended procedures for clas- meant to be an evolving document, one that requires change sifying and naming stratigraphic and related units was pre- as the field of earth science evolves. The revisions to the pared during a four-year period, by and for North American Code that are included in this 2005 edition encompass a earth scientists, under the auspices of the North American broad spectrum of changes, ranging from a complete revision Commission on Stratigraphic Nomenclature. It represents of the section on Biostratigraphic Units (Articles 48 to 54), the thought and work of scores of persons, and thousands of several wording changes to Article 58 and its remarks con- hours of writing and editing. Opportunities to participate in cerning Allostratigraphic Units, updating of Article 4 to in- and review the work have been provided throughout its corporate changes in publishing methods over the last two development, as cited in the Preamble, to a degree unprece- decades, and a variety of minor wording changes to improve dented during preparation of earlier codes. clarity and self-consistency between different sections of the Publication of the International Stratigraphic Guide in Code. In addition, Figures 1, 4, 5, and 6, as well as Tables 1 1976 made evident some insufficiencies of the American and Tables 2 have been modified. Most of the changes Stratigraphic Codes of 1961 and 1970. The Commission adopted in this revision arose from Notes 60, 63, and 64 of considered whether to discard our codes, patch them over, the Commission, all of which were published in the AAPG or rewrite them fully, and chose the last. -
Aquifer List
ARKANSAS NATURAL RESOURCES COMMISSION 101 East Capitol Avenue, Suite 350; Little Rock, AR 72201 Phone: (501) 682-1611 Fax: (501) 682-3991 www.anrc.arkansas.gov T T Arkansas Aquifer Codes E This is a list of the identified underground aquifers and their code numbers in the state. E ALLUVIUM 112ALVM EVERTON FORMATION 364EVRN PENTERS CHERT 347PNRS ANNONA CHALK 211ANNN FAYETTEVILLE SHALE 332FTVL PIKE GRAVEL 217PIKE ARKADELPHIA MARL 211AKDP FERNVALE LIMESTONE 361FRVL PITKIN LIMESTONE 331PTKN E E ARKANSAS NOVACULITE 330ARKS GASCONADE DOLOMITE 367GSCK PLATTIN LIMESTONE 364PLTN ATOKA FORMATION 326ATOK GOODLAND LIMESTONE 218GDLD PLEISTOCENE SERIES 112PLSC ATOKAN SERIES 326ATKN GUNTER SANDSTONE 367GNTR PLIOCENE SERIES 121PLCN BATESVILLE SANDSTONE 331BSVL HALE FORMATION 328HALE POLK CREEK SHALE 361PKCK H H BIGFORK CHERT 364BGFK HARTSHORNE SANDSTONE 325HRSR PORTERS CREEK CLAY 125PRCK BLACK ROCK FORMATION 367PKRK HATTON TUFF LENTIL 330HNTF POTOSI DOLOMITE 371POTS BLAKELY SANDSTONE 367BLKL HINDSVILLE LIMESTONE 331HDVL POWELL DOLOMITE 368PWLL BLAYLOCK SANDSTONE 350BLCK HOLLY CREEK FORMATION 218HLCK PRAIRIE GROVE 328PRGV S S BLOYD SHALE 328BLVD HOLOCENE ALLUVIUM 111ALVM PRECAMBRIAN ERATHEM 400PCMB BOGGY SHALE 325BGGY HOLOCENE SERIES 111HLCN PRECAMBRIAN IGNEOUS ROCKS 400IGNS BONNETERRE DOLOMITE 371BNTR HOT SPRINGS SANDSTONE 330HSPG QUATERNARY ALLUVIUM 110ALVM BOONE FORMATION 330BOON JACKFORK SANDSTONE 328JKFK REDFIELD FORMATION 124RDFD BRASSFIELD LIMESTONE 357BFLD JACKSON GROUP 124JCKS ROUBIDOUX FORMATION 367RBDX T T BRENTWOOD LIMESTONE 328 BRND JEFFERSON