Commission of the European Communities

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Commission of the European Communities COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES Brussels, 08.11.2002 COM(2002) 612 final FIFTH COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE COUNCIL AND THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT on the application of Articles 4 and 5 of Directive 89/552/EEC “Television without Frontiers”, as amended by Directive 97/36/EC, for the period 1999–2000 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................................3 I. COMMISSION’S OPINION ON THE APPLICATION OF ARTICLES 4 AND 5 FOR THE PERIOD 1999/2000.................................................4 1. Application by the European Union Member States ....................................................4 1.1 Requirement to broadcast a majority proportion of European works...........................5 1.1.1 Assessment at Community level...................................................................................5 1.1.2. Assessment at national level .......................................................................................10 1.2 Works by independent producers ...............................................................................25 1.2.1 Assessment at Community level.................................................................................25 1.2.2 Assessment at Member State level .............................................................................29 1.3 General conclusion .....................................................................................................41 2.1 Requirement to broadcast a majority proportion of European works.........................42 2.2 European works by independent producers ................................................................42 2.1 Requirement to broadcast a majority proportion of European works.........................42 2.2 European works by independent producers ................................................................42 II. - SUMMARY OF THE REPORTS FROM THE MEMBER STATES ..............................44 III. – SUMMARY OF THE REPORTS FROM THE MEMBER STATES OF THE EUROPEAN FREE TRADE ASSOCIATION PARTICIPATING IN THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AREA.............................................................100 IV. ANNEXES........................................................................................................................103 ANNEX 1 LIST OF TELEVISION CHANNELS IN THE EUROPEAN UNION MEMBER STATES WHICH FAILED TO ACHIEVE THE MAJORITY PROPORTION OF EUROPEAN WORKS AND/OR THE MINIMUM PROPORTION OF 10% OF EUROPEAN WORKS BY INDEPENDENT PRODUCERS ........................................................................................104 ANNEX 2 PARAMETERS USED TO CALCULATE THE AVERAGE TRANSMISSION TIME OF EUROPEAN WORKS BY THE CHANNELS OF THE EUROPEAN UNION MEMBER STATES (TAKING AUDIENCE RATING INTO ACCOUNT) — ARTICLE 4 OF THE “TELEVISION WITHOUT FRONTIERS” DIRECTIVE.................................................111 2 INTRODUCTION This communication, drawn up pursuant to Article 4.3 of Council Directive 89/552/EEC1 of 3 October 1989 on the coordination of certain provisions laid down by law, regulation or administrative action in Member States concerning the pursuit of television broadcasting activities, as amended by Directive 97/36/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 June 19972 (hereinafter referred to as the “Television without Frontiers” Directive), constitutes the Commission’s fifth report on the implementation of Articles 4 and 5. This document includes a statistical statement on the achievement in 1999-2000 of the proportion referred to in Articles 4 and 5 for each of the television programmes falling within the jurisdiction of the European Union Member State concerned and those of the Member States of the European Free Trade Association participating in the European Economic Area (hereinafter referred to as EFTA). The Member States are under an obligation to provide the Commission with a report every two years on their application of Articles 4 and 5. Under the provisions of the Treaty, the Commission is responsible for ensuring compliance with this requirement. The purpose of this document is to bring these national reports, together with the Commission’s opinion on the implementation of Articles 4 and 5 of the “Television without Frontiers” Directive, to the attention of the Member States, the European Parliament and the Council. It comprises three parts and two annexes: S Part I – Commission’s opinion on the application of Articles 4 and 5 for the period 1999-2000; S Part II – National reports from the European Union Member States; S Part III – National reports from the Member States of the European Free Trade Association participating in the European Economic Area; S Annex 1: List of television channels in the European Union Member States which failed to achieve the majority proportion of European works (Article 4 of the Directive) and/or the minimum proportion of 10% of European works by independent producers (Article 5 of the Directive); S Annex 2: Parameters used to calculate the average transmission time of European works by the channels of the European Union Member States (taking audience rating into account) — Article 4 of the Directive. 1 OJEC L 298, 17.10.1989. 2 OJEC L 202, 30.07.1997. 3 I. COMMISSION’S OPINION ON THE APPLICATION OF ARTICLES 4 AND 5 FOR THE PERIOD 1999/2000 1. APPLICATION BY THE EUROPEAN UNION MEMBER STATES Under Article 4.3 of the “Television without Frontiers” Directive, the Commission is responsible for ensuring the application of Articles 4 and 5 in accordance with the provisions of the Treaty. The European Union Member States and the EFTA Member States participating in the European Economic Area are under an obligation to provide the Commission with a report every two years on application of Articles 4 and 5, including (i) a statistical statement on the achievement of the proportion referred to in these Articles for each of the television programmes falling within the jurisdiction of the Member State concerned, (ii) the reasons, in each case, for the failure to attain that proportion, (iii) and the measures adopted or envisaged in order to achieve it. Article 4.3 of the Directive provides that the Commission may take account in its opinion, in particular, of (non-exhaustive criteria): – progress achieved in relation to previous years; – the share of first broadcast works in the programming; – the particular circumstances of new television broadcasters; – the specific situation of countries with a low audiovisual production capacity or restricted language area. To assist the Member States with their monitoring responsibilities, guidelines drawn up by the Contact Committee3 have been suggested for the implementation of Articles 4 and 5. These guidelines, which are intended to clarify certain definitions so as to avoid differences of interpretation and application of the Directive4, entered into force on 1 January 1999 and therefore cover the reference period (1999-2000) of this report. This is the background against which the opinion set out in this document should be examined. For the first time, it shows the general trends observed both at Community level and in the individual Member States concerned. To this end, a series of indicators based on the criteria set out in Articles 4 and 5 of the Directive has been developed to provide an objective analysis grid. Article 4 (European works): S Indicator 1: average transmission time reserved for European works by the European channels with the highest audience ratings5 in each Member State concerned. S Indicator 2: compliance rate of channels (achieving or exceeding the majority proportion) of all types, in each Member State concerned6. 3 http://europa.eu.int/comm/avpolicy/regul/twf/art45/art45-intro_en.htm 4 By way of illustration, section 2.2 of the guidelines states that it is not necessary for national reports to include data on channels broadcasting exclusively “news, sports events, games, advertising, teletext services and teleshopping”. 5 For each year under consideration, the audience share is based on the most recent figures published by the European Audiovisual Observatory: Statistical Yearbook 2000 (Volume 2) “Household audiovisual equipment, transmission, television audience”. Except in specific cases, all channels with over 3% audience share (whole day) over each of the two years under consideration were taken into account. 4 S Indicator 3: general trend, in terms of number of channels of all types, in the scheduling of European works over the reference period (1999-2000)7. Article 5 (European works by independent producers): S Indicator 1: average air time, or alternatively, depending on the choice made by the Member State when transposing the Directive, the average proportion of the programming budget allocated to European works by independent producers. S Indicator 2: compliance rate of channels of all types (achieving or exceeding the minimum of 10%) in the Member State concerned8. S Indicator 3: general trend, in terms of number of channels of all types, in the proportion of European works by independent producers broadcast in each Member State concerned over the reference period (1999-2000). S Indicator 4: average air time, or alternatively, depending on the choice made by the Member State when transposing the Directive, the proportion of the programming budget allocated to recent works by independent producers S Indicator 5: general trend, in terms of number of channels of all types, in the proportion
Recommended publications
  • Seguimiento De Accesibilidad a La
    SEGUIMIENTO DE ACCESIBILIDAD A LA TDT Informe de la CMT sobre accesibilidad de los contenidos televisivos Informe Económico Sectorial 2012 Comisión del Mercado de las Telecomunicaciones CMT Seguimiento de accesibilidad a la TDT ÍNDICE I. INTRODUCCIÓN ......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 4 Origen de los datos ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 4 Operadores y canales incluidos en el informe ......................................................................................................................................................................................... 4 Porcentajes y valores de los servicios de accesibilidad en la programación de los canales según la LGCA 7/2010 ................................................................................................................................................... 5 Canales de programación de nueva emisión .............................................................................................................................................................................................. 6 Información solicitada a los
    [Show full text]
  • A Natale E in Ocasione Della Campagna Mediaset
    OSSERVATORIO DI PAVIA - DONO E DINTORNI NELL’INFORMAZIONE IN ITALIA Analisi delle notizie di: TG1 20.00, TG2 20.30 TG319.00, TG4 18.55, TG5 20.00, Studio Aperto, 18.30, TG LA7 19.55 IN 12 MESI Notizie rilevate 0,34% del totale 56.823 NOTIZIE REGISTRATE 198 PERTINENTI PICCHI DI ATTENZIONE A NATALE E IN OCASIONE DELLA CAMPAGNA MEDIASET LA FABBRICA DEL SORRISO LUGLIO 2015 – GIUGNO 2016 Fonte: OSSERVATORIO DI PAVIA OSSERVATORIO DI PAVIA - DONO E DINTORNI NELL’INFORMAZIONE IN ITALIA Analisi delle notizie di: TG1 20.00, TG2 20.30 TG319.00, TG4 18.55, TG5 20.00, Studio Aperto, 18.30, TG LA7 19.55 14000 11896 L’AGENDA: 12000 56.823 NEWS GENERALI 198 NEWS SUL DONO IL DONO 10000 È TRASVERSALE 9100 AI VARI TEMI DELLA 8000 7691 AGENDA DEI TELEGIORNALI 6277 6000 5563 IL DONO 4999 SUPERA LA SOGLIA 140 D E L L A N O T I Z I A B I L I T À 120 4000 P R E V A L E N T E M E N T E 100 115 AL TRAINO DI: 80 2030 Totale 2000 60 QUESTIONI 40 1299 982 SOCIALI 20 21 29 12 SPETTACOLO, 0 0 CRONACA SCIENZE E SALUTE Cronaca Cronaca Economia LUGLIO 2015 – GIUGNO 2016 Politica interna Politica Scienza e Salute Fonte: OSSERVATORIO DI PAVIA Ambiente e natura Ambiente e natura Costume e società Costume Cultura, Spettacolo, Spettacolo, Cultura, Condizioni del tempo Condizioni Esteri e politica estera Esteri e politica estera Questioni Sociali e Legali Questioni Sociali e Legali OSSERVATORIO DI PAVIA - DONO E DINTORNI NELL’INFORMAZIONE IN ITALIA Analisi delle notizie di: TG1 20.00, TG2 20.30 TG319.00, TG4 18.55, TG5 20.00, Studio Aperto, 18.30, TG LA7 19.55 Distribuzione
    [Show full text]
  • La TV D'orange Par Le Satellite ASTRA En Un Clin D'œil
    La TV d'Orange par le satellite ASTRA en un clin d'œil Légende 19 août au 06 octobre 2021 chaînes incluses F Bouquet Famille bIS beIN SPORTS Mc Bouquet Musique Classique AmX Bouquet Adulte Max(5) CS Bouquet Ciné Séries SpM Bouquet Sports Max C+ Offres CANAL+ G Bouquet Gay chaînes et bouquets en option CSM Bouquet Ciné Séries Max My Melody(4) A Bouquet Adulte [PKL] Pickle TV(6) R programmes disponibles en replay Chaînes de la TNT 52 R OCS Choc CS, CSM HD(1) 169 R Stingray Classica Mc HD(1) 1 R TF1 HD(1) 53 R OCS Géants CS, CSM HD(1) 2 R France 2 HD(1) 54 R OCS CS, CSM SD Sport 3 R France 3 National HD(1) 173 R Equidia HD(1) 4 CANAL+* C+ HD(1) Cinéma 176 R beIN SPORTS 1 bIS, SpM HD(1) 5 R France 5 HD(1) 177 R beIN SPORTS 2 bIS, SpM HD(1) 6 R M6 HD(1) 55 R TCM Cinéma CS, CSM HD(1) 178 R beIN SPORTS 3 bIS, SpM HD(1) 7 R ARTE HD(1) 56 R Paramount Channel CS, CSM HD(1) 179 beIN SPORTS MAX 4 bIS, SpM HD(1) 8 R C8 HD(1) 58 R Action CS, CSM HD(1) 180 beIN SPORTS MAX 5 bIS, SpM HD(1) 9 R W9 HD(1) 59 R Ciné+Premier CSM HD(1) 181 beIN SPORTS MAX 6 bIS, SpM HD(1) 10 R TMC HD(1) 60 R Ciné+Frisson CSM HD(1) 182 beIN SPORTS MAX 7 bIS, SpM HD(1) 11 R TFX HD(1) 61 R Ciné+Emotion CSM HD(1) 183 beIN SPORTS MAX 8 bIS, SpM HD(1) 12 R NRJ12 HD(1) 62 R Ciné+Famiz CSM HD(1) 184 beIN SPORTS MAX 9 bIS, SpM HD(1) 13 LCP/PS HD(1) 63 R Ciné+Club CSM HD(1) 185 beIN SPORTS MAX 10 bIS, SpM HD(1) 14 R France 4 HD(1) 64 R Ciné+Classic CSM HD(1) 196 Automoto la chaîne F, SpM HD(1) 15 BFM TV HD(1) 16 CNews HD(1) Divertissement Information française 17 R Cstar HD(1) 72 R
    [Show full text]
  • The Reinvention of Club RTL How RTL Belgium’S Number Two Channel Is Being Modernised
    24 February 2011 week 08 The reinvention of Club RTL How RTL Belgium’s number two channel is being modernised United Kingdom France FremantleMedia and Random Destination RTL heads House produce children’s formats for southern Spain Netherlands Belgium Radio 538 looks for RTL-TVI portrays Guus Meeuwis’ supporting act the ‘real’ Dr House the RTL Group intranet week 08 24 February 2011 week 08 Cover: Stéphane Rosenblatt, Director of Television, RTL Belgium The reinvention of Club RTL 2 How RTL Belgium’s number two channel is being modernised United Kingdom France FremantleMedia and Random Destination RTL heads House produce children’s formats for southern Spain Netherlands Belgium Radio 538 looks for RTL-TVI portrays Guus Meeuwis’ supporting act the ‘real’ Dr House the RTL Group intranet week 08 “As strong and diverse as possible” RTL Belgium’s Director of Television Stéphane Rosenblatt talks about the evolving Belgian family of channels. Club RTL’s new slogan: Make your choice! Belgium - 17 February 2011 What is the strategy of RTL Belgium? Over the years RTL Belgium has created a strong, tight-knit, complementary family. Strong, because it is the clear leader in the French-speaking market in Belgium, which may be small at 4 million people, but is fiercely competitive because it is also open to French channels. Consequently, the Belgian market poses a real challenge, but this did not prevent RTL Belgium from proudly attaining a combined prime time audience share of 34 per cent in 2010. Tight-knit because our family is full of team spirit. All our teams, whether involved in production or programming, have a transversal culture.
    [Show full text]
  • Euskaduna Naiz, Eta Zu? Espainia
    Euskaduna naiz, eta zu? Espainia CONTENIDOS DEL INFORME: § ANÁLISIS TÉCNICO DEL ESPACIO ‘EUSKALDUNA NAIZ, ETA ZU?’ § ANÁLISIS CUALITATIVO DEL PROGRAMA ‘EUSKALDUNA NAIZ, ETA ZU?’ § ¿QUÉ ES EITB? § LA POLITIZACIÓN DE EITB § ALGUNAS DENUNCIAS RELEVANTES SOBRE EL SESGO IDEOLÓGICO DE EITB § GESTIÓN DE LA CRISIS POR PARTE DE EITB Y GOBIERNO § ENCAJE DEL PROGRAMA EN EL CÓDIGO DEONTOLÓGICO DE EITB § LA REFORMA DE EITB 2 3 Análisis técnico del espacio ‘Euskalduna naiz, eta zu?’ El espacio ‘Euskalduna naiz, eta zu? Espainia’ fue emitido el miéRcoles 8 de febReRo de 2017 en la fRanja hoRaRia compRendida entRe las 22.25 y las 23.34 horas en ETB1. Después, su visionado fue posible a través de la página web eitb.eus. Según la consultoRa especializada Kantar Media, en su estreno obtuvo una audiencia de 27.000 espectadores, lo que representa un ‘share’ o cuota de pantalla del 2,8%. He aquí un pequeño desglose de la audiencia: 3.000 espectadoRes tenían menos de 25 años, 13.000 de 25 a 45 años y 10.000 eRan mayoRes de 45 años. 12.000 espectadoRes Residían en localidades de menos de 10.000 habitantes y sólo 1.000 espectadoRes en ciudades de más de 200.000, que en Euskadi son Vitoria y Bilbao. CompaRativamente, la dedicada a España fue la entRega más seguida de la media docena de capítulos de ‘Euskalduna naiz, eta zu?’. La siguiente emisión en espectadores de ‘Euskalduna naiz, eta zu?’ logró un 2,1% de ‘shaRe’. La semana anteRioR al capítulo sobRe España, el ‘shaRe’ fue apenas del 0,6% (solamente 6.000 televidentes).
    [Show full text]
  • Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2020
    Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2020 Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2020 Nic Newman with Richard Fletcher, Anne Schulz, Simge Andı, and Rasmus Kleis Nielsen Supported by Surveyed by © Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism / Digital News Report 2020 4 Contents Foreword by Rasmus Kleis Nielsen 5 3.15 Netherlands 76 Methodology 6 3.16 Norway 77 Authorship and Research Acknowledgements 7 3.17 Poland 78 3.18 Portugal 79 SECTION 1 3.19 Romania 80 Executive Summary and Key Findings by Nic Newman 9 3.20 Slovakia 81 3.21 Spain 82 SECTION 2 3.22 Sweden 83 Further Analysis and International Comparison 33 3.23 Switzerland 84 2.1 How and Why People are Paying for Online News 34 3.24 Turkey 85 2.2 The Resurgence and Importance of Email Newsletters 38 AMERICAS 2.3 How Do People Want the Media to Cover Politics? 42 3.25 United States 88 2.4 Global Turmoil in the Neighbourhood: 3.26 Argentina 89 Problems Mount for Regional and Local News 47 3.27 Brazil 90 2.5 How People Access News about Climate Change 52 3.28 Canada 91 3.29 Chile 92 SECTION 3 3.30 Mexico 93 Country and Market Data 59 ASIA PACIFIC EUROPE 3.31 Australia 96 3.01 United Kingdom 62 3.32 Hong Kong 97 3.02 Austria 63 3.33 Japan 98 3.03 Belgium 64 3.34 Malaysia 99 3.04 Bulgaria 65 3.35 Philippines 100 3.05 Croatia 66 3.36 Singapore 101 3.06 Czech Republic 67 3.37 South Korea 102 3.07 Denmark 68 3.38 Taiwan 103 3.08 Finland 69 AFRICA 3.09 France 70 3.39 Kenya 106 3.10 Germany 71 3.40 South Africa 107 3.11 Greece 72 3.12 Hungary 73 SECTION 4 3.13 Ireland 74 References and Selected Publications 109 3.14 Italy 75 4 / 5 Foreword Professor Rasmus Kleis Nielsen Director, Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism (RISJ) The coronavirus crisis is having a profound impact not just on Our main survey this year covered respondents in 40 markets, our health and our communities, but also on the news media.
    [Show full text]
  • MTV Base“ Und „MTV Extra“
    Zulassungsantrag der MTV Networks GmbH für die bundesweiten digitalen Fernsehspartenprogramme „MTV Base“ und „MTV Extra“ Aktenzeichen: KEK 088 Beschluss In der Rundfunkangelegenheit der MTV Networks GmbH, Osterwaldstr. 10, Haus B, 80805 München, vertreten durch die Geschäftsführerin Christiane zu Salm, – Antragstellerin – wegen Zulassung zur Veranstaltung der bundesweiten Fernsehspartenprogramme „MTV Base“ und „MTV Extra“ hat die Kommission zur Ermittlung der Konzentration im Medienbereich (KEK) auf Vorlage der Landesanstalt für Rundfunk Nordrhein-Westfalen (LfR) vom 10.07.2000 aufgrund der Sitzung am 19.12.2000 unter Mitwirkung ihrer Mitglieder Prof. Dr. Dr. h. c. Mestmäcker (Vorsitzender), Prof. Dr. Dörr, Prof. Dr. Kübler, Prof. Dr. Lerche, Dr. Lübbert und Prof. Dr. Mailänder entschieden: Der von der MTV Networks GmbH mit Schreiben an die Landesanstalt für Rundfunk Nordrhein-Westfalen (LfR) vom 15.12.1999 beantragten Zulassung zur Veranstaltung der bundesweit verbreiteten digitalen Fernsehspartenprogramme „MTV Base“ und „MTV Extra“ stehen Gründe der Sicherung der Meinungsvielfalt im Fernsehen nicht entgegen. Unberührt bleibt die Überprüfung unter Berücksichtigung des Plattform- und Vermarktungsvertrages, dessen Vorlage die LfR der Antragstellerin zur Auflage machen wird. 2 Begründung I Sachverhalt 1 Zulassungsantrag Die Antragstellerin MTV Networks GmbH (nachfolgend MTV Networks) hat mit Schreiben vom 15.12.1999 bei der Landesanstalt für Rundfunk Nordrhein-Westfalen (LfR), dort eingegangen am 17.12.1999, die Zulassung zweier bundesweiter digitaler Musikspartenprogramme „MTV Base“ und „MTV Extra“ für die Dauer von zehn Jahren beantragt. 2 Programmstruktur Die geplanten Programme MTV Base und MTV Extra sind xxxxxxxxxxx, überwiegend deutschsprachige musikorientierte Spartenprogramme, die sich speziell an Zielgruppen unter den 16 - 24jährigen richten. Vorgesehen ist, dass MTV Base die Schwerpunkte Rhythm and Blues sowie Hip Hop und Dance setzt, redaktionell über Künstler berichtet und Interviews sendet.
    [Show full text]
  • Analoge Radio En TV
    Analoge Radio en TV Rapport uitgebracht aan OPTA Definitief Door Stratix Consulting BV Hilversum, juli 2008 Management samenvatting OPTA heeft, in het kader van de marktanalyse, behoefte aan informatie over de rol van analoge RTV-pakketten in de ontwikkeling van de omroepmarkt. OPTA is met name geïnteresseerd in de factoren die van invloed zijn op i) de vraag van eindgebruikers naar analoge RTV-pakketten en ii) het aanbod van analoge RTV-pakketten door kabelexploitanten, om daarmee inzicht te krijgen in de te verwachten ontwikkeling van deze factoren in de komende jaren. Dit rapport geeft antwoorden op vier vragen van OPTA: 1. Welke factoren zijn van invloed op de continuering van doorgifte en/of de omvang van een analoog RTV-pakket dat door kabelexploitanten (en exploitanten van een FttH netwerk) wordt aangeboden? 2. In welke richting ontwikkelen die factoren zich, en welke ontwikkelingen zijn als gevolg daarvan in de komende 3-5 jaar te verwachten op het gebied van doorgifte van analoge RTV-pakketten? 3. Welke rol speelt een analoog RTV-pakket in de komende 3-5 jaar in de RTV-markt? In hoeverre beïnvloedt de (on)mogelijkheid van een analoog RTV-pakket Nederlandse consumenten bij de keuze tussen RTV-dienstverlening via de verschillende RTV- transmissieplatforms (kabel, satelliet, DVB-T, xDSL en FTTH)? Indien nodig moet een nader onderscheid gemaakt worden tussen het belang van analoge radiopakketten en analoge televisiepakketten. 4. Op welke termijn verwacht uw onderzoeksbureau dat het merendeel van consumenten enkel nog digitale RTV-pakketten zal willen gebruiken? Welke aanwijzingen zijn er op dit moment te onderkennen binnen de geïdentificeerde factoren, die van doorslaggevend belang zijn voor het bereiken van die situatie? Op deze vragen zijn de volgende antwoorden gevonden: 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Stream Name Category Name Coronavirus (COVID-19) |EU| FRANCE TNTSAT ---TNT-SAT ---|EU| FRANCE TNTSAT TF1 SD |EU|
    stream_name category_name Coronavirus (COVID-19) |EU| FRANCE TNTSAT ---------- TNT-SAT ---------- |EU| FRANCE TNTSAT TF1 SD |EU| FRANCE TNTSAT TF1 HD |EU| FRANCE TNTSAT TF1 FULL HD |EU| FRANCE TNTSAT TF1 FULL HD 1 |EU| FRANCE TNTSAT FRANCE 2 SD |EU| FRANCE TNTSAT FRANCE 2 HD |EU| FRANCE TNTSAT FRANCE 2 FULL HD |EU| FRANCE TNTSAT FRANCE 3 SD |EU| FRANCE TNTSAT FRANCE 3 HD |EU| FRANCE TNTSAT FRANCE 3 FULL HD |EU| FRANCE TNTSAT FRANCE 4 SD |EU| FRANCE TNTSAT FRANCE 4 HD |EU| FRANCE TNTSAT FRANCE 4 FULL HD |EU| FRANCE TNTSAT FRANCE 5 SD |EU| FRANCE TNTSAT FRANCE 5 HD |EU| FRANCE TNTSAT FRANCE 5 FULL HD |EU| FRANCE TNTSAT FRANCE O SD |EU| FRANCE TNTSAT FRANCE O HD |EU| FRANCE TNTSAT FRANCE O FULL HD |EU| FRANCE TNTSAT M6 SD |EU| FRANCE TNTSAT M6 HD |EU| FRANCE TNTSAT M6 FHD |EU| FRANCE TNTSAT PARIS PREMIERE |EU| FRANCE TNTSAT PARIS PREMIERE FULL HD |EU| FRANCE TNTSAT TMC SD |EU| FRANCE TNTSAT TMC HD |EU| FRANCE TNTSAT TMC FULL HD |EU| FRANCE TNTSAT TMC 1 FULL HD |EU| FRANCE TNTSAT 6TER SD |EU| FRANCE TNTSAT 6TER HD |EU| FRANCE TNTSAT 6TER FULL HD |EU| FRANCE TNTSAT CHERIE 25 SD |EU| FRANCE TNTSAT CHERIE 25 |EU| FRANCE TNTSAT CHERIE 25 FULL HD |EU| FRANCE TNTSAT ARTE SD |EU| FRANCE TNTSAT ARTE FR |EU| FRANCE TNTSAT RMC STORY |EU| FRANCE TNTSAT RMC STORY SD |EU| FRANCE TNTSAT ---------- Information ---------- |EU| FRANCE TNTSAT TV5 |EU| FRANCE TNTSAT TV5 MONDE FBS HD |EU| FRANCE TNTSAT CNEWS SD |EU| FRANCE TNTSAT CNEWS |EU| FRANCE TNTSAT CNEWS HD |EU| FRANCE TNTSAT France 24 |EU| FRANCE TNTSAT FRANCE INFO SD |EU| FRANCE TNTSAT FRANCE INFO HD
    [Show full text]
  • 0884 Future Reflections 2
    Future Reflections Four scenarios for television in 2012 A scenario analysis study of the television industry Led by Bournemouth Media School With research support from The Independent Television Commission and The British Screen Advisory Council FUTURE REFLECTIONS: FOUR SCENARIOS FOR TELEVISION IN 2012. A scenario analysis study of the television industry Written by Robin Foster and Christine Daymon of Bournemouth Media School with Sam Tewungwa of the Independent Television Commission The Future Reflections project was coordinated by: Robin Foster, Dr Christine Daymon, Professor John Ellis, Roger Laughton, Professor Barry Richards and Sam Tewungwa. Dr Mark Wheeler provided additional research support. November 2002 Participants Main panel: Dawn Airey Tess Alps Sly Bailey Daniel Ballin David Bergg David Brook Ajay Chowdhury Mike Darcey David Docherty John Egan Sue Farr Alex Graham Andrew Harrison Ashley Highfield Alison Hopkins Mathew Horsman Roly Keating Phil Kirby Matt Peacock Simon Rees Jamie Reeve Ed Richards Paul Robinson Mark Rowland Matthew Stibbe Damian Tambini Simon Terrington Second panel: Tom Box Danny Cohen Andy Culpin Lianne Daly Liz Faber Miles Jarvis Olly Lambert Matthew Stibbe (also on main panel) 2 INDEX Participants 2 Part I: The Project Introduction and Overview 4 Chapter 1: Towards 2012: Exploring the future of television 6 Chapter 2: The four scenarios 13 Chapter 3: Issues and challenges 36 Part II: The Wider Context Chapter 4: Society and consumers 50 Chapter 5: The economic and political/regulatory context 54 Chapter 6: Industry structure and competition 57 Chapter 7: Technology, content and services 60 Chapter 8: The European context 65 Part III: The Methodology Chapter 9: Research design 72 Appendices Appendix 1: Interview protocol 77 Appendix 2: Industry variables 79 3 PART ONE: THE PROJECT Introduction and Overview There is no doubt that the television industry in Britain has entered a period of fundamental and unpredictable change.
    [Show full text]
  • Annex 4: Report from the States of the European Free Trade Association Participating in the European Economic Area
    ANNEX 4: REPORT FROM THE STATES OF THE EUROPEAN FREE TRADE ASSOCIATION PARTICIPATING IN THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AREA 1. Application by the EFTA States participating in the EEA 1.1 Iceland European works The seven covered channels broadcast an average of 39.6% European works in 2007 and 42.2% in 2008. This represents a 2.6 percentage point increase over the reference period. For 2007 and 2008, of the total of seven covered channels, three channels achieved the majority proportion specified in Article 4 of the Directive (Omega Television, RUV and Syn - Vision TV), while four channels didn't meet this target (Sirkus, Skjár 1, Stöð 2 and Stöð 2 Bio). The compliance rate, in terms of numbers of channels, was 42.9%. European works made by independent producers The average proportion of European works by independent producers on all reported channels was 10.7% in 2007 and 12.6% in 2008, representing a 1.9 percentage points increase over the reference period. In 2007, of the total of seven identified channels, two channels exceeded the minimum proportion under Article 5 of the Directive, while three channels remained below the target. One channel was exempted (Syn - Vision TV) and no data was communicated for another one (Omega Television). The compliance rate, in terms of number of channels, was 33.3%. For 2008, of the total of seven covered channels, three exceeded the minimum proportion specified in Article 5 of the Directive, while two channels were below the target (Skjár 1 and Stöð 2 Bio). No data were communicated for two channels.
    [Show full text]
  • LISTA KANALOW LCN 01-07-17 -Korbank
    LISTA KANAŁÓW I N T E R N E T T E L E W I Z J A T E L E F O N obowiązuje od 01.07.2017r. NAZWA NR STANDARD HD MEDIUM HD EXTRA HD NAZWA NR STANDARD HD MEDIUM HD EXTRA HD (124) (166) (193) (124) (166) (193) OGÓLNE 17 17 17 Russia Today Doc 314 ETV 315 TVP 1 001 Polsat DOKU 316 TVP 2 002 TVN 003 ROZRYWKA 11 16 19 Polsat 004 TVP Rozrywka 400 TV4 005 TVN Turbo 401 TV 6 006 TVN Style 402 TVN Siedem 007 Domo+ HD 403 TV PULS 008 Kuchnia+ 404 TV PULS 2 009 BBC Brit 405 TV TRWAM 011 BBC Lifestyle 406 TTV 012 Discovery Life 407 TVP Polonia 013 TLC 408 Polonia 1 014 Polsat Cafe 409 Polsat 2 015 Polsat Play 410 Tele 5 016 Food Network 411 Zoom TV 022 ATM Rozrywka 412 WP1 023 TO!TV 413 INFORMACJE 13 16 16 Adventure 414 Wellbeing 416 TVN 24 Biznes i Świat 017 Nowa TV 417 HGTV 018 Metro 418 TVP Info 100 Super Polsat 419 TVN 24 101 Polsat News 104 SPORT 7 7 Polsat News 2 105 Eurosport 1 500 TVS HD 106 Eurosport 2 501 BBC World News 108 nSport 502 CNBC 109 Polsat Sport 503 Russia Today 110 Polsat Sport Extra 504 France 24 ENG 111 Polsat Sport News 505 Biełsat TV 112 TVP Sport 506 UA TV 113 Polsat Sport Fight 507 Kazakh TV 114 DLA DZIECI 1 9 12 Press TV 115 Arirang 116 TVP ABC 600 MiniMini+ 601 FILMY I SERIALE 3 10 19 Teletoon+ 602 Stopklatka.tv 200 Disney Channel 603 ale kino+ 201 Disney Junior 604 Romance TV 202 Disney XD 605 AMC 203 Nickelodeon 606 FOX 204 Nickelodeon Polska 607 FOX Comedy 205 Nick Jr 608 Kino Polska 206 Cbeebies 609 Polsat Film 207 Polsat JimJam 610 Polsat Romans 208 Top Kids 611 TVP Seriale 209 MUZYKA 17 18 25 Comedy Central 210 Comedy
    [Show full text]