10 896 Zanatta 6.Indd
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Community Profile
Community Profile TOWN OF SPANISH, ONTARIO APM-REP-06144-0104 NOVEMBER 2014 This report has been prepared under contract to the NWMO. The report has been reviewed by the NWMO, but the views and conclusions are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of the NWMO. All copyright and intellectual property rights belong to the NWMO. For more information, please contact: Nuclear Waste Management Organization 22 St. Clair Avenue East, Sixth Floor Toronto, Ontario M4T 2S3 Canada Tel 416.934.9814 Toll Free 1.866.249.6966 Email [email protected] www.nwmo.ca Community Profile: Spanish, ON November 28, 2014 Document History Title: Community Well-Being Assessment – Community Profile – the Town of Spanish, ON Revision: 0 Date: June 29, 2012 Hardy Stevenson and Associates Limited Prepared By: Approved By: Dave Hardy Revision: 1 Date: August 3, 2012 Prepared By: Danya Braun and Dave Hardy Approved By: Dave Hardy Revision: 2 Date: September 21, 2012 Prepared By: Danya Braun and Dave Hardy Approved By: Dave Hardy Revision: 3 Date: August 30, 2013 Prepared By: Danya Braun, Andrzej Schreyer, Noah Brotman and Dave Hardy Approved By: Dave Hardy Revision: 4 Date: January 31, 2014 Prepared By: Danya Braun, Dave Hardy and Noah Brotman Approved By: Dave Hardy Revision: 5 Date: February 14, 2014 Prepared By: Danya Braun and Dave Hardy Approved By: Dave Hardy Revision: 6 Date: March 14, 2014 Prepared By: Danya Braun and Dave Hardy Approved By: Dave Hardy Revision: 7 Date: May 29, 2014 Prepared By: Danya Braun and Dave Hardy Approved By: Dave -
Iron Bridge Area District of Algoma
THESE TERMS GOVERN YOUR USE OF THIS DOCUMENT Your use of this Ontario Geological Survey document (the “Content”) is governed by the terms set out on this page (“Terms of Use”). By downloading this Content, you (the “User”) have accepted, and have agreed to be bound by, the Terms of Use. Content: This Content is offered by the Province of Ontario’s Ministry of Northern Development and Mines (MNDM) as a public service, on an “as-is” basis. Recommendations and statements of opinion expressed in the Content are those of the author or authors and are not to be construed as statement of government policy. You are solely responsible for your use of the Content. You should not rely on the Content for legal advice nor as authoritative in your particular circumstances. Users should verify the accuracy and applicability of any Content before acting on it. MNDM does not guarantee, or make any warranty express or implied, that the Content is current, accurate, complete or reliable. MNDM is not responsible for any damage however caused, which results, directly or indirectly, from your use of the Content. MNDM assumes no legal liability or responsibility for the Content whatsoever. Links to Other Web Sites: This Content may contain links, to Web sites that are not operated by MNDM. Linked Web sites may not be available in French. MNDM neither endorses nor assumes any responsibility for the safety, accuracy or availability of linked Web sites or the information contained on them. The linked Web sites, their operation and content are the responsibility of the person or entity for which they were created or maintained (the “Owner”). -
An Assessment of the Groundwater Resources of Northern Ontario
Hydrogeology of Ontario Series (Report 2) AN ASSESSMENT OF THE GROUNDWATER RESOURCES OF NORTHERN ONTARIO AREAS DRAINING INTO HUDSON BAY, JAMES BAY AND UPPER OTTAWA RIVER BY S. N. SINGER AND C. K. CHENG ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AND REPORTING BRANCH MINISTRY OF THE ENVIRONMENT TORONTO ONTARIO 2002 KK PREFACE This report provides a regional assessment of the groundwater resources of areas draining into Hudson Bay, James Bay, and the Upper Ottawa River in northern Ontario in terms of the geologic conditions under which the groundwater flow systems operate. A hydrologic budget approach was used to assess precipitation, streamflow, baseflow, and potential and actual evapotranspiration in seven major basins in the study area on a monthly, annual and long-term basis. The report is intended to provide basic information that can be used for the wise management of the groundwater resources in the study area. Toronto, July 2002. DISCLAIMER The Ontario Ministry of the Environment does not make any warranty, expressed or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed in this report. Reference therein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the ministry. KKK TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 2. INTRODUCTION 7 2.1 LOCATION OF THE STUDY AREA 7 2.2 IMPORTANCE OF SCALE IN HYDROGEOLOGIC STUDIES 7 2.3 PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF THE STUDY 8 2.4 THE SIGNIFICANCE OF THE GROUNDWATER RESOURCES 8 2.5 PREVIOUS INVESTIGATIONS 9 2.6 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 13 3. -
Petition to List US Populations of Lake Sturgeon (Acipenser Fulvescens)
Petition to List U.S. Populations of Lake Sturgeon (Acipenser fulvescens) as Endangered or Threatened under the Endangered Species Act May 14, 2018 NOTICE OF PETITION Submitted to U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service on May 14, 2018: Gary Frazer, USFWS Assistant Director, [email protected] Charles Traxler, Assistant Regional Director, Region 3, [email protected] Georgia Parham, Endangered Species, Region 3, [email protected] Mike Oetker, Deputy Regional Director, Region 4, [email protected] Allan Brown, Assistant Regional Director, Region 4, [email protected] Wendi Weber, Regional Director, Region 5, [email protected] Deborah Rocque, Deputy Regional Director, Region 5, [email protected] Noreen Walsh, Regional Director, Region 6, [email protected] Matt Hogan, Deputy Regional Director, Region 6, [email protected] Petitioner Center for Biological Diversity formally requests that the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (“USFWS”) list the lake sturgeon (Acipenser fulvescens) in the United States as a threatened species under the federal Endangered Species Act (“ESA”), 16 U.S.C. §§1531-1544. Alternatively, the Center requests that the USFWS define and list distinct population segments of lake sturgeon in the U.S. as threatened or endangered. Lake sturgeon populations in Minnesota, Lake Superior, Missouri River, Ohio River, Arkansas-White River and lower Mississippi River may warrant endangered status. Lake sturgeon populations in Lake Michigan and the upper Mississippi River basin may warrant threatened status. Lake sturgeon in the central and eastern Great Lakes (Lake Huron, Lake Erie, Lake Ontario and the St. Lawrence River basin) seem to be part of a larger population that is more widespread. -
Species Assessment for Fat Pocketbook
Species Status Assessment Class: Bivalvia Family: Unionidae Scientific Name: Potamilus capax Common Name: Fat pocketbook Species synopsis: Potamilus capax is thought to have been extirpated in New York State for over a century (Strayer and Jirka 1997), and has not been found at historical sites during recent surveys (Mahar & Landry 2013). P. capax is a member of the widely distributed genus Potamilus. P. capax belongs to the subfamily Ambleminae and the tribe Lampsilini, which includes 17 extant and 6 likely extirpated New York species of the genera Actinonaias, Epioblasma, Lampsilis, Leptodea, Ligumia, Obovaria, Potamilus, Ptychobranchus, Toxolasma, Truncilla, and Villosa (Haag 2012; Graf and Cummings 2011). This species is listed as state and federally endangered and is ranked by The Natural Heritage Program as historic in New York and as imperiled throughout its range. It is distributed in the Lower Ohio River system and Mississippi River drainages in Arkansas and Nebraska (Watters et al. 2009), where P. capax abundance is stable, with multiple reproductively viable sites. A current threat to the species is that populations are sporadic and disjunct, with the entire species only inhabiting approximately 20 sites (NatureServe 2013). 1 I. Status a. Current and Legal Protected Status i. Federal ____ Endangered_______________Candidate? ___________ ii. New York _____Endangered__________________________________________________ b. Natural Heritage Program Rank i. Global _____G2- Imperiled_______________________________________________ ii. New York _____SH - Historic_______ Tracked by NYNHP? ______Yes___ Other Rank: U.S. Endangered Species Act (USESA): LE: Listed endangered (1976) IUCN Red List Category: Critically endangered Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species Protection Status (CITES): Appendix I American Fisheries Society Status: Endangered (1993) Status Discussion: The peripheral range (where P. -
Lake Huron North Channel : Section 3
Lake Huron North Channel : Section 3 Glendale i Kirkpatrick r Kirbys Corner g e a Lake iv R sland Lake R s n s Legend / Légende eyden de i Little Whi r s te Ri a s v G i River White Waterfront Trail - On-road / Sur la route Washrooms / Washrooms 65 aaultult CCanalanal M Miss de S Wakomata al Garden River Poplar Lake Waterfront Trail - Off-road / Hors route an 546 639 $ Commercial Area / Zone commerciale Dale Mississagi C Echo L. Waterfront Trail - Gravel road / arys 17B M River Echo Bay Tunnel Route en gravier Railway Crossing / Passage à niveau Payment Leeburn Ophir Lake Little Blind Waterfront Trail - Proposed / Proposée ault 638 Dunns Valley ovincial A Roofed Accommodation / Hébergement avec toiture HCR Rock River Parc pr Alerts / Alertes Marie 17 670 554 Matinenda El * Lake 638 Wharncliffe Commercial Area / Zone commerciale Provincial Park 5.0 Distance / Distance (km) $ Plummer Rydal 108 osedale 86 Little 31 Parkinson 4 Bruce Bank Rapids Matinenda Other Trails - Routes / Desbarats Sta. Day 546 Chiblow Lake D'autres pistes - Routes Wifi / Wifi 29 Mills Lake Richards Bruce Mines Sowerby Iron Bridge Lake Superior Water Trail / Landing Nestorville 557 Sentier maritime du lac Supérieur Restaurants / Restaurants 6W 5 Pronto 548 Hospital / Hôpital -RVHSK Hilton Beach Mississagi River East Kentvale Thessalon6 57 Liquor Control Board of Ontario / Régie des alcools de l'Ontario ,VODQG 548 Sprag Attraction / Attraction LCBO North Channel ord RNOM St. Joseph’s I. NMBS Blind 538 Inshore Mississagi Algoma Beach / Plage Border Crossing / Poste de frontière Lieu historique national Ft. St. River Stalwart Delta Mills Joseph National Historic Site Campground / Camping 48 Potagannissing Conservation Area / Zone de protection de la nature Bay oetzville Information / Renseignements De Tour ? Provincial Park / Parc provincial de l’Ontario rville Village Drummond North Channel 134 Viewpoint / Vue panoramique Caribou FFy.y. -
Sea Lamprey Control in the Great Lakes 2016
SEA LAMPREY CONTROL IN THE GREAT LAKES 2016 ANNUAL REPORT TO THE GREAT LAKES FISHERY COMMISSION Katherine Mullett U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Marquette, Michigan United States Paul Sullivan Fisheries and Oceans Canada Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario Canada GLFC Annual Meeting Duluth, Minnesota June 7-8, 2017 Cover: Larval Sea Lampreys being captured by USFWS Larval Assessment personnel with the use of backpack electroshocking units to determine population densities, age structure and larval distribution. (Photo USFWS) Patrick Wick (Physical Science Technician, USFWS) preparing a TFM application site on Stony Creek, a tributary to the East Branch Ontonagon River, during the Ontonagon River lampricide treatment in October 2016 (Photo by Chris Gagnon, USFWS). Table of Contents INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................................................... 7 FISH-COMMUNITY OBJECTIVES ............................................................................................................ 8 Lake Superior .................................................................................................................................... 8 Lake Michigan .................................................................................................................................. 8 Lake Huron ....................................................................................................................................... 9 Lake Erie .......................................................................................................................................... -
Twps. of Gladstone & Bright
\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ ! MUNICIPALITY ! OF HUR PARKINSON TWP ! ON SHORE \ S ! ! \ ! MUNICIPALITY OF HURON SHORES Ralph Lake ! \ ! ! ! \ ! Eaket Lake ! \ MELWEL ROAD ! ! ! \ ! ! \ ! Upper Slate Rapids ! \ ! ! \ ! \ \ ! \ ! ! ! \ ! IL ! ! \ RA ARTR T ! ! P I D M Slate Rapids \ G R ! E T RAIL FA \ N ! DUN ! \ ! \ ! ! \ ! ! ! ! \ ! ! ! \ ! ! ! \ O ! ! A ! K Basswood Lake Conservation Reserve ! \ R Red Rock Lake ! ID ! GE ! \ TR ! AI L ! \ ! \ ! Gladstone Lake ! \ ! \ ! ! \ ! ! \ ! ! \ ! ! ! \ Day ! ! P ! ! ! S \ ! W ! E SEE SCHEDULE 'A2' ! T ! \ P R ! ! ! E ! O ! ! ! ! ! ! W ! F \ RA ! N IR ! S OA T Potomac River H B AY R D ! ! O ! S Y P ! RE T D ! R \ ! O Basswood Lake A C K N ! S ! ! ! R W ! ! ! ! D ! ! D ! ! ! O T D ! ! ! ! ! \ ! R A ! ! Y ! ! U L ! ! R \ ! Gladstone ! \ H G ! E Shino Rapids ! ! ! \ ! F ! M ! ! ! ! O ! O \ ! ! ! 6 Y ! Foot Lake G 4 ! ! ! 5 ! T M ! T C \ M Y I ILLA ! ! A N ! N ! ! ! L ! W L ! ! H O A A ! ! \ N G ! ! I P E M H ! I ! ! ! C \ ! I SOWERBY ! ! ! N ! \ Clear Lake U ! Sowerby ! Harris Creek ! ! M ! ! \ Day Mills ! T ! E E D ! \ R ! R C ! ! ! ! ! ! ! T M ! U S A A HIG ! \ C HW ! D KA P AY 17 Warnock Lake Y R D N ! A R ad E ! IVE o R R E ! O D R R I ! R L E O ! \ A r R O B L O E ! e A ! R R D A Y R p D T ! S O B a E ! O CHIB ! N L r OW LAKE ROAD \ A R N ! M O D ! D E R ! T O ! ! O W Y A ! N D \ A ! O Y D S E ! P D A ! \ Huron -
Rare Animals Tracking List
Louisiana's Animal Species of Greatest Conservation Need (SGCN) ‐ Rare, Threatened, and Endangered Animals ‐ 2020 MOLLUSKS Common Name Scientific Name G‐Rank S‐Rank Federal Status State Status Mucket Actinonaias ligamentina G5 S1 Rayed Creekshell Anodontoides radiatus G3 S2 Western Fanshell Cyprogenia aberti G2G3Q SH Butterfly Ellipsaria lineolata G4G5 S1 Elephant‐ear Elliptio crassidens G5 S3 Spike Elliptio dilatata G5 S2S3 Texas Pigtoe Fusconaia askewi G2G3 S3 Ebonyshell Fusconaia ebena G4G5 S3 Round Pearlshell Glebula rotundata G4G5 S4 Pink Mucket Lampsilis abrupta G2 S1 Endangered Endangered Plain Pocketbook Lampsilis cardium G5 S1 Southern Pocketbook Lampsilis ornata G5 S3 Sandbank Pocketbook Lampsilis satura G2 S2 Fatmucket Lampsilis siliquoidea G5 S2 White Heelsplitter Lasmigona complanata G5 S1 Black Sandshell Ligumia recta G4G5 S1 Louisiana Pearlshell Margaritifera hembeli G1 S1 Threatened Threatened Southern Hickorynut Obovaria jacksoniana G2 S1S2 Hickorynut Obovaria olivaria G4 S1 Alabama Hickorynut Obovaria unicolor G3 S1 Mississippi Pigtoe Pleurobema beadleianum G3 S2 Louisiana Pigtoe Pleurobema riddellii G1G2 S1S2 Pyramid Pigtoe Pleurobema rubrum G2G3 S2 Texas Heelsplitter Potamilus amphichaenus G1G2 SH Fat Pocketbook Potamilus capax G2 S1 Endangered Endangered Inflated Heelsplitter Potamilus inflatus G1G2Q S1 Threatened Threatened Ouachita Kidneyshell Ptychobranchus occidentalis G3G4 S1 Rabbitsfoot Quadrula cylindrica G3G4 S1 Threatened Threatened Monkeyface Quadrula metanevra G4 S1 Southern Creekmussel Strophitus subvexus -
The Expansion of Ojibway and French Place Œ Names Into the Lake
The Expansion of Ojibway and French Place-names into the Lake Superior Region in the Seventeenth Century! ALAN H. HARTLEY DESPITE ITS LOCATION in the remote interior of North Amer- ica, Lake Superior has a written history of almost 350 years. It owes its early exploration and settlement to its position on the ancient trans- continental water-route which extends from the Gulf of S1. Lawrence, through the Ottawa River, Lake Winnipeg and the Saskatchewan River, to the Rocky Mountains. It was the westward expansion of Ojibway-speaking Indians2 and the French, their customers in the fur trade, which made this vast area known to Europe. The early to- ponymy of Lake Superior and its eastern approaches reflects this partnership in its mixture of Ojibway and French names. For the purposes of this study, the westward expansion of the French can be considered to have occurred in three stages. I. 1608-1641, from Samuel de Champlain's establishment of a trading post at Quebec, through Jean Nicolet's explorations around Green Bay in 1634, to the visit of Fathers Jogues and Raymbault to Sault Ste. Marie. Lake Superior lay in unexplored country. II. 1659-1684, from Radisson and Des Groseillers' explorations in western Lake Superior and the Sioux country, to Sieur Dulhut's establishment of posts on Lake Nipigon, Thunder Bay and possibly the headwaters of the St. Croix River in Wisconsin. This was the period during which the Lake Superior basin 1 I am grateful to the following for their constructive reviews of this paper: Alan Rayburn, Secretariat of Geographical Names, Ottawa; William Cowan, Carleton University, Ottawa; Edith Hols, University of Minnesota, Duluth; Donald Lawrence, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis. -
Its Name Is a French Translation of "Chengwatana" (Pine Town), Originally an Ojibwe Village Located Just East of Pine City, Along the Snake River
Its name is a French translation of "Chengwatana" (Pine Town), originally an Ojibwe village located just east of Pine City, along the Snake River. The Ojibwe name for the city is Ne-zhingwaakokaag (on a land-point full of white pines). Chengwatana was an Ojibwa village, located along the lower course of the Snake River, Minnesota. Its name in Ojibwe was Zhingwaadena, a contraction of Zhingwaak-oodena or "White-Pine Town". After statehood of Wisconsin in 1848, the transient village became a permanent village located at the outlet of Cross Lake, on its south eastern shore, at the beginning of the lower course of the Snake River, named Snake River Dam. Elam Greeley, a lumberman whom Greeley is named after, owned the Chengwatana toll dam at the outlet of Cross Lake. On March 1, 1856, with very informal ceremony, the village was officially named as the County Seat of Pine County and the village was renamed Alhambra by Judd, Walker and Company and Daniel G. Robertson; however, this name was not very well accepted. In 1857, Alhambra was renamed as Chengwatana. When the Military Road, also known as "Douglas Highway," was constructed between the modern cities of Hastings, Minnesota and Superior, Wisconsin to replace the Kettle River Trail that connected the modern cities of Fridley, Minnesota with Moose Lake, Minnesota, the new road was designed to pass through Chengwatana. The village was garrisoned as a frontier military post, 1862-1863. A post office operated in the village until 1873. When the railroad was constructed on the western shore of Cross Lake, a new village, Pine City, was platted — Pine City's name being a loose English translation of Chengwatana. -
Ontario's Great Lakes Strategy
Ontario’s Great Lakes Strategy 2012 Prepared by: The Government of Ontario December 2012 For more information on Ontario’s Great Lakes Strategy, visit the Ministry of the Environment at: Ontario.ca/environment or call 1-800-565-4923 © Queen’s Printer for Ontario, 2012 Disponible en francais PIBS 9198e Ontario’s Great Lakes Strategy TABLE OF CONTENTS Ontario’s Great Lakes Strategy ..............................................................................................1 Overview ................................................................................................................................2 Why We Need Action to Protect the Great Lakes ..................................................................5 Why The Great Lakes Matter to the People of Ontario ..........................................................9 Building On Ontario’s Great Lakes Accomplishments .........................................................13 Where We Are Headed: A Great Lakes Strategy for Action .................................................30 The Vision ..........................................................................................................................30 Great Lakes Goals .............................................................................................................30 Principles ...........................................................................................................................31 Ontario’s Great Lakes Goals 1: Engaging and Empowering Communities .....................................................................32