DOCSLIB.ORG

Saranac Lakes Wild Forest Proposed Final UMP Redline

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Saranac Lakes Wild Forest Proposed Final UMP Redline SARANAC LAKES WILD FOREST and Lake Placid Boat Launch Lake Flower Boat Launch Upper Saranac Lake Boat Launch Raquette River Boat Launches Proposed Final Unit Management Plan River Area Management Plans Saranac River, Ausable River, and Raquette River Final Environmental Impact Statement NYS DEC, REGION 5, DIVISION OF LANDS AND FORESTS P.O. Box 296, 1115 State Route 86, Ray Brook, NY 12997-0296 [email protected] Deleted: November Deleted: June www.dec.ny.gov December 2018 This page intentionally left blank Acknowledgements Planning Team: Kevin Burns, Forest Ranger Josh Clague, Natural Resources Planner Jon Fieroh, Fisheries Biologist Steven Guglielmi, Forester Lt. Julie Harjung, Forest Ranger Jeffery Hovey, Environmental Conservation Officer Paul Jensen, Wildlife Biologist Joe LaPierre, Forest Ranger Doug McCabe, Operations Megan McCone, Forest Ranger Nick McKay, Operations Kevin Prickett, Adirondack Park Agency Scott VanLaer, Forest Ranger David Winchell, Public Participation Specialist Contributors: Kristofer A. Alberga, Regional Forester Keith Bassage, Forest Ranger (retired) Bob Chatt, Environmental Conservation Officer (retired) Robert Daley, Supervising Forester Chad P. Dawson, Ph.D., SUNY ESF (retired) Phil Johnstone, Operations (retired) Walter Linck, Adirondack Park Agency Mark David Mink, SUNY ESF Rich Preall, Fisheries Biologist (retired) Zachary Odell, SUNY ESF Tierney Rosenstock, Natural Resource Panner Cindy Trummer, secretary Deleted: Nov Deleted: June Saranac Lakes Wild Forest – Proposed Final Unit Management Plan – Dec. 2018 i This page intentionally left blank Deleted: Nov Deleted: ember Deleted: June Saranac Lakes Wild Forest – Proposed Final Unit Management Plan – Dec. 2018 ii Contents Preface ............................................................................................................................ v I. Introduction .................................................................................................................. 1 II. Inventory, Use, and Capacity to Withstand Use ....................................................... 7 A. Natural Resources ................................................................................................... 7 B. Facilities ................................................................................................................ 48 Deleted: 4850 C. Past Influences ...................................................................................................... 48 Deleted: 4851 D. Public Use ............................................................................................................. 51 Deleted: 5153 E. Recreational Opportunities for Persons with Disabilities ....................................... 60 Deleted: 6163 F. Relationship between Public and Private Land ...................................................... 61 Deleted: 6163 G. Capacity to Withstand Use .................................................................................... 66 Deleted: 6768 H. Education, Interpretation and Research ................................................................ 74 Deleted: 7576 III. Management and Policy ......................................................................................... 77 Deleted: 7779 A. Past Management ................................................................................................. 77 Deleted: 7779 B. Management Guidelines ....................................................................................... 84 Deleted: 8486 C. Administration ....................................................................................................... 88 Deleted: 8890 D. Management Issues, Needs and Desires ............................................................. 89 Deleted: 8991 IV. Proposed Management Actions .......................................................................... 91 Deleted: 9193 A. Bio-Physical Resources ........................................................................................ 91 Deleted: 9193 B. Land and Water Protection .................................................................................... 96 Deleted: 9698 C. Facilities ............................................................................................................. 107 Deleted: 107108 D. Public Use and Access ....................................................................................... 148 Deleted: 148149 Deleted: 155156 E. Proposed Regulations ......................................................................................... 155 Deleted: 156157 F. Special Management Areas ................................................................................ 156 Deleted: Nov Deleted: June Saranac Lakes Wild Forest – Proposed Final Unit Management Plan – Dec. 2018 iii Table of Contents V. Schedule for Implementation and Estimated Budget ........................................... 177 Deleted: 177179 Appendices ................................................................................................................. 183 Deleted: 183185 Appendix 1: Facilities .................................................................................................. 185 Deleted: 185187 Appendix 2: Justifications for Fishing and Waterway Access Sites ............................. 209 Deleted: 209211 Appendix 3: Saranac Lake Islands Campsite Photograph Comparison ...................... 213 Deleted: 213215 Appendix 4: Acronyms ................................................................................................ 219 Deleted: 219221 Appendix 5: Mammals and Birds ................................................................................. 221 Deleted: 221223 Appendix 6: Individual Pond Descriptions ................................................................... 235 Deleted: 235237 Appendix 7: Lakes and Ponded Water Survey Data ................................................... 311 Deleted: 311313 Appendix 8: Citizen Discussion Group ........................................................................ 325 Deleted: 325327 Appendix 9: Response to Public Comments ............................................................... 329 Deleted: 329331 Appendix 10: Open House Public Comments ............................................................. 383 Deleted: 383385 Appendix 11: Bibliography and References ................................................................ 391 Deleted: 391393 Appendix 12: Trail Register Information ...................................................................... 399 Deleted: 399401 Appendix 13: Maps ...................................................................................................... 401 Deleted: 401403 Formatted: Tab stops: Not at 1.72" Formatted: Normal Formatted: Tab stops: Not at 2.01" Deleted: Nov Deleted: ember Deleted: June Saranac Lakes Wild Forest – Proposed Final Unit Management Plan – Dec. 2018 iv Preface The Saranac Lakes Wild Forest (SLWF) Unit Management Plan (UMP) has been developed by the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (Department) pursuant to, and is consistent with, relevant provisions of the New York State Constitution, Environmental Conservation Law (ECL) and its implementing regulations, Executive Law, Adirondack Park State Land Master Plan (APSLMP), New York State Department policies and procedures and the State Environmental Quality Review Act. The State lands in this UMP are within the Forest Preserve and protected by Article XIV, Section 1 of the New York State Constitution. This Constitutional provision, which became effective on January 1, 1895 provides in relevant part: “The lands of the state, now owned or hereafter acquired, constituting the Forest Preserve as now fixed by law, shall be forever kept as wild forest lands. They shall not be leased, sold or exchanged, or be taken by any corporation, public or private, or shall the timber thereon be sold, removed or destroyed.” ECL §§3-0301(1)(d) and 9-0105(1) provide the Department with jurisdiction to manage Forest Preserve lands, including the Saranac Lakes Wild Forest. The APSLMP was initially adopted in 1972 by the Adirondack Park Agency (APA) with advice from, and in consultation with, the Department pursuant to Executive Law §807, now recodified as Executive Law §816. The APSLMP provides the overall general framework for the development and management of State lands in the Adirondack Park (Park), including those State lands which are the subject of this UMP. The APSLMP places State land within the Park into the following classifications: Wilderness, Primitive, Canoe, Wild Forest, Intensive Use, Historic, State Administrative, and Travel Corridors, and sets forth management guidelines for the lands falling within each major classification. The APSLMP classifies the lands which are the subject of this UMP as part of the Saranac Lakes Wild Forest. The APSLMP sets forth guidelines for such matters as: structures and improvements; ranger stations; the use of motor vehicles, motorized equipment and aircraft; public roads and administrative roads; flora and fauna; recreation use and overuse; boundary structures and improvements and boundary markings. Executive Law §816 requires the Department to develop, in consultation with the APA, individual UMPs for each unit of land under the Department’s jurisdiction. The UMPs must conform to the guidelines and criteria set forth in the APSLMP. Executive Law §816(1) provides in part that “(u)ntil amended, the APSLMP for Deleted: Nov management
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 2 Boxes ACCESS: Open to Research ACQUISITION: PROCESSED BY: Margie Amodeo
    Constitutional Council for the Forest Preserve UC0055 1 of 1 Constitutional Council for the Forest Preserve 1966-1976 UC0055 QUANTITY: 2 boxes ACCESS: Open to research ACQUISITION: PROCESSED BY: Margie Amodeo Biographical Note: The Constitutional Council for the Forest Preserve formed in January 1966 as a coalition to be prepared challenges to Article XIV at the New York State Constitutional Convention. It was designed to serve as a liaison at the time of the Convention and in May 1968 elected to continue serving to alert organizations state-wide to a variety of concerns that related to the problems of the Forest Preserve. When the coalition was founded, officers from over fifty organizations joined along with the individual memberships were issued. Proposed changes to the constitution were bundled and voted on as a whole and rejected by every New York county. The CCFP continued to function as a group seeking to maintain Forest Preserve protection within the state constitution. As of January 1971, the Council consisted of 138 members. The officers included David Newhouse (who would also become an advisor to the TSCFA), David Sive, Arthur M. Crocker, R. Watson Pomeroy and William K. Verner. The consortium was dissolved in 1976 because as David Newhouse, CCFP Chairman, writes, “its function is now fulfilled by other organizations such as EPL and The Adirondack Council.” Any remaining funds were transferred to the Adirondack Council. Scope and Content Note: This Collection includes evidence of not only the internal discussion informing the opinions and decisions of this group of environmentalist leaders but letters and statements from members to political leaders.
    [Show full text]
  • Commission Update
    COMMISSIONERS: Benjy Cooke, Chair Lisa King Mattese Lecque, Vice Chair Wesley Lybrand Andy Thomas, Secretary-Treasurer Ravi Sanyal Tom O’Rourke, Executive Director Commission Update __________________________________________________________________________________ February 19, 2014 Commission Meeting – Monday, February 24th, 2014, 10:00am. – Bulow Plantation Commission Retreat Please NOTE : The retreat will start at 10:00am and will be completed prior to 2:00. Lunch will be served. Please NOTE: The location for the retreat is Bulow Plantation. Directions: Take US 17 South, At the Redtop area of Town, HUGHS RD. is on the right side of the road traveling south. (At the convenient store where Dodges Chicken is sold.) Go about 2 miles down the road and you will see Bulow Plantation on the right. If you are having trouble finding it, call my cell number 843-345-3915 Retreat Agenda: You will see on the agenda that we will be discussion some regular business items. We will need some time in Executive Session to discuss our contractual and legal issues with our repairs at the Folly Pier. We also will talk about the College of Charleston Lease at the property next to James Island County Park and Gina will be going over our exciting new “Branding” initiative for the agency. Most of the retreat will focus on the Agency Financial situation, the buget, and more efficient reporting of our information. 861 Riverland Drive Charleston, South Carolina 29412 (843) 762-2172 FAX (843) 762-2683 CHARLESTON COUNTY PARK AND RECREATION COMMISSION LAKE HOUSE AT BULOW REGULAR COMMISSION MEETING MONDAY, FEBRUARY 24, 2014 AGENDA I. Call To Order And Welcome Cooke A.
    [Show full text]
  • Guidelines for Constructing Local Roads in New York's Adirondack Park Edward J
    5 Guidelines for Constructing Local Roads in New York's Adirondack Park Edward J. Kearney, New York state Department of Transportation, Albany The Adirondack Park in upstate New York contains more than 23 000 phasize that aesthetics and engineering are mutually km2 (9000 rniles2) of public and private lands. Most stote·owned land is dependent and that roads can be built that will be designated by the state constitution to remain "forever wild", and de­ operationally safe and efficient and easier and cheaper velopment of private land is closely controlled by the Adirondack Park to maintain and yet will blend attractively into the sur­ Agency, which is part of the executive branch of the state government and also has jurisdiction over construction of new municipal roads and rounding landscape. Figures 1 and 2 show examples of expansions of existing ones. Guidelines that have been developed for use good construction practices in the park, a11d Figure 3 in lieu of review of individual local road projects by the Adirondack Park shows an example of what should be avoided. Agency are presented and discussed. The guidelines are presented in Many researchers have questioned the applicability seven categories: (a) planning, (b), alignment, (c) cross section, (d) road­ of the American Association of state Highway and bed construction, (e) riding surface, (f) bridges and culverts, and (g) gen­ Transportation Officials (AASHTO) Geometric Design eral construction. Their objective is to ensure that local roads are con­ Guide for Local Roads and streets (!) and Highway De­ structed or reconstructed so that they fit harmoniously into the natural surroundings and impart the feeling of being in a park.
    [Show full text]
  • 2010 the Adirondack Park the Adirondack Park Is the Largest Park in the Contiguous Through Public Education and Advocacy for the United States
    State of the Park 2010 The Adirondack Park The Adirondack Park is the largest park in the contiguous Through public education and advocacy for the United States. It contains six million acres, covers one- protection of the Park’s ecological integrity and wild fifth of New York State and is equal in size to neighboring character, the Adirondack Council advises public and Vermont. The Adirondack Park is nearly three times the private policy makers on ways to safeguard this last size of Yellowstone National Park. remaining great expanse of open space. More than half of the Adirondack Park is private land, devoted principally to hamlets, forestry, agriculture and open-space recreation. The Park is home for 132,000 permanent and 110,000 seasonal residents, and hosts ten million visitors yearly. The remaining 45 percent of the Park is publicly owned Forest Preserve, protected as “Forever Wild” by the Lake Placid NYS Constitution since 1894. One Tupper Lake million acres of these public lands Elizabethtown are protected as Wilderness, where non-mechanized recreation may be enjoyed. The majority of the public land (more than 1.3 million acres) is Wild Forest, where motorized uses are permitted on designated waters, Indian Lake roads and trails. Old Forge Plants and wildlife abound in the Park. Old growth forests cover more than 100,000 acres of public land. The western and southern Adirondacks are gentle landscapes of Lake George hills, lakes, wetlands, ponds and streams. In the northeast are the High Peaks. Forty- three of them rise above 4,000 feet and 11 have alpine summits that rise above the timberline.
    [Show full text]
  • October 16, 2018 VIA E-FILING Kimberly D. Bose Secretary Federal
    October 16, 2018 VIA E-FILING Kimberly D. Bose Secretary Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 888 First Street, N.E. Washington, DC 20426 Alice Falls Hydroelectric Project (FERC No. 5867-053) Supplemental Information to the Pre-Application Document Dear Secretary Bose: Alice Falls Hydro, LLC (Alice Falls Hydro), a wholly owned subsidiary of Eagle Creek Renewable Energy, LLC (Eagle Creek), is the licensee and operator of the Alice Falls Hydroelectric Project, FERC No. 5867 (Project), located on the Ausable River in the Hamlet of Keeseville, Clinton and Essex Counties, New York. On September 28,2018, Alice Falls Hydro electronically filed with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC or Commission) the Notice of Intent to File a License Application (NOI) and accompanying Pre-Application Document (PAD) for the Project. Subsequent to filing the PAD, Alice Falls Hydro obtained, via a FERC eLibrary request, these additional documents available only on microfilm, which had not been available at the time of the PAD filing. Accordingly, Alice Falls Hydro is filing the following information to update and/or supplement information provided in the PAD, as follows: Attachment A provides the 1993 Exhibit F and replaces the 1992 Exhibit F documents provided in Appendix H (CEII) of the PAD. Attachment A also provides the Single Line Drawing which is the same as that provided in the PAD filing. Attachment B provides the 1993 Exhibit G and replaces the Exhibit G document provided in Appendix E of the PAD. Note the figures in the PAD denote the 1990 Exhibit G Project boundary. These figures will be updated in the draft and final license application filings to denote the 1993 Exhibit G project boundary.
    [Show full text]
  • Hpcandvmwfpubliccomments
    This is an example of a mass email letter sent to NYSDEC. Dear Boreal UMP Comments, Thank you for the chance to comment on the High Peaks Wilderness Complex and the Vanderwhacker Mountain Wild Forest Draft Unit Management Plan Amendments. The following are my recommendations to the DEC: (1) The DEC comment period should be 90 days, not 45 days; and the hearings should be scheduled all around the state not just in Albany and Newcomb (on May 23). There are many critical management issues in these areas that require thoughtful review. (2) The parking lot proposed at the end of Gulf Brook Road, at the end of the Wild Forest corridor, 500 feet from Boreas Ponds, should be for disabled access only, through the DEC CP-3 program. The potential for "keg rolls", as occurred at Marcy Dam, is too high to allow general public parking (referred to as "universal access" in the UMP) in this area, which is surrounded by lands and waters which are to be managed as Wilderness. (3) The historic log cabin at 4 Corners should be retained, and maintained, with historic interpretive signage, and also for possible use for DEC forest ranger administrative purposes. The area surrounding the cabin should also be managed with historic interpretive signage reflecting the other structures that were there, and the rich logging history of the area. (4) There should be no parking area created at the 4 Corners. Parking should be limited to the existing lot (referred to as the Fly Brook Lot in the UMP); automobiles and other motorized vehicles should not pass beyond the gate at this lot, except for those with valid CP-3 disabled permits, accompanied by a forest ranger.
    [Show full text]
  • Adirondack Park Agency Letterhead
    NOTE: The attachments referred to herein are on file at the Agency and are on the Agency's website. Copies are also available for inspection on request. DRAFT AGENCY MINUTES AUGUST 12-13, 2010 THURSDAY, AUGUST 12, 2010 AGENCY MEMBERS, DESIGNEES AND EXECUTIVE STAFF PRESENT Curt Stiles, Chairman Richard Booth, Member Arthur Lussi, Member Frank Mezzano, Member William Thomas, Member Leilani Ulrich, Member F. William Valentino, Member Cecil Wray, Member James Fayle, Designee, NYS Department of Economic Development Elizabeth Lowe, Designee, NYS Department of Environmental Conservation Terry Martino, Executive Director John Banta, Counsel Note: Riele Morgiewicz, Designee, NYS Department of State, monitored the meeting from her office via live webcast. LOCAL GOVERNMENT REVIEW BOARD PRESENT Frederick Monroe, Executive Director AGENCY STAFF PRESENT Holly Kneeshaw, Assistant Director, Regulatory Programs Keith McKeever, Public Information Director Robert Kreider, Information Technology Specialist 2 Kathleen Regan, Associate Natural Resources Planner Mary Reardon, Secretary 1 Paul Van Cott, Associate Attorney Stephen Erman, Special Assistant for Economic Affairs Rita Quinn, Environmental Program Specialist 2 Deborah Lester, Secretary to Executive Director P.O. Box 99 • NYS Route 86 • Ray Brook, NY 12977 • 518 891-4050 • 518 891-3938 fax • www.apa.state.ny.us DRAFT AGENCY MINUTES August 12-13, 2010 Page 2 Chairman Stiles called the meeting to order at 9:02 a.m. He noted this meeting marked the first anniversary of Executive Director Terry Martino joining the Agency. He noted the absence of Department of State Designee Morgiewicz, who would be monitoring Thursday's meetings from her office via live webcast and attending Friday's meeting in person.
    [Show full text]
  • 119Opn17-Decision.Pdf
    This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the New York Reports. ----------------------------------------------------------------- No. 119 In the Matter of World Trade Center Lower Manhattan Disaster Site Litigation. --------------------------------- Stanislaw Faltynowicz, et al., Appellants, State of New York, Intervenor-Appellant, v. Battery Park City Authority, et al., Respondents. --------------------------------- Santiago Alvear, Appellant, State of New York, Intervenor-Appellant, v. Battery Park City Authority, Respondent. --------------------------------- Peter Curley et al., Appellants, State of New York, Intervenor-Appellant, v. Battery Park City Authority, Respondent. Andrew W. Amend, for intervenor-appellant. Luke W. Nikas, for appellants Alvear, et al. Daniel S. Connolly, for respondents. FEINMAN, J.: This matter comes to us from an order of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit certifying the following questions pursuant to Rule 500.27 of this Court: - 1 - - 2 - No. 119 "(1) Before New York State's capacity-to-sue doctrine may be applied to determine whether a State-created public benefit corporation has the capacity to challenge a State statute, must it first be determined whether the public benefit corporation 'should be treated like the State,' [(Clark-Fitzpatrick, Inc. v Long Island R.R. Co., 70 NY2d 382 [1987])], based on a 'particularized inquiry into the nature of the instrumentality and the statute claimed to be applicable to it,' [(John Grace & Co. v State Univ. Constr. Fund, 44 NY2d 84 [1978])], and if so, what considerations are relevant to that inquiry?; and "(2) Does the 'serious injustice' standard articulated in [Gallewski v H. Hentz & Co. (301 NY 164 [1950])], or the less stringent 'reasonableness' standard articulated in [Robinson v Robins Dry Dock & Repair Co.
    [Show full text]
  • Saranac Lakes Wild Forest Draft Unit Management Plan
    SARANAC LAKES WILD FOREST and Lake Placid Boat Launch Lake Flower Boat Launch Upper Saranac Lake Boat Launch Raquette River Boat Launches Draft Unit Management Plan Draft River Area Management Plans Saranac River, Ausable River, and Raquette River Draft Environmental Impact Statement NYS DEC, REGION 5, DIVISION OF LANDS AND FORESTS P.O. Box 296, 1115 State Route 86, Ray Brook, NY 12997-0296 [email protected] www.dec.ny.gov June 2017 This page intentionally left blank Acknowledgements Planning Team: Kevin Burns, Forest Ranger Josh Clague, Natural Resources Planner Jon Fieroh, Fisheries Biologist Steven Guglielmi, Forester Lt. Julie Harjung, Forest Ranger Jeffery Hovey, Environmental Conservation Officer Paul Jensen, Wildlife Biologist Joe Lapierre, Forest Ranger Megan McCone, Forest Ranger Doug McCabe, Operations Nick McKay, Operations Kevin Prickett, Adirondack Park Agency Scott VanLaer, Forest Ranger David Winchell, Public Participation Specialist Contributors: Kristofer A. Alberga, Regional Forester Keith Bassage, Forest Ranger (retired) Bob Chatt, Environmental Conservation Officer (retired) Robert Daley, Supervising Forester Chad P. Dawson, Ph.D., SUNY ESF (retired) Phil Johnstone, Operations (retired) Walter Linck, Adirondack Park Agency Mark David Mink, SUNY ESF Rich Preall, Fisheries Biologist (retired) Zachary Odell, SUNY ESF Cindy Trummer, secretary Saranac Lakes Wild Forest – Draft Unit Management Plan – June 2017 i Acknowledgments This page intentionally left blank Saranac Lakes Wild Forest – Draft Unit Management Plan – June
    [Show full text]
  • The Adirondack Park at a Crossroad: a Road Map for Action
    The Adirondack Park at a Crossroad: A Road Map for Action www.AdirondackWild.org The Adirondack Park at a Crossroad: A Road Map for Action by Adirondack Wild: Friends of the Forest Preserve Part 1 – New Threats Emerge: State Government Strays from its Park Mission Copyright: Adirondack Wild: Friends of the Forest Preserve, 2015. Primary authors of Part 1 of this report are Adirondack Wild’s Staff Partners David Gibson and Dan Plumley and Consultant Dr. Michael Klemens. This team works with an editorial committee comprised of Chris Amato, Peter Brinkley, John Johanson and Ken Rimany. Particular thanks are also owed to Adelaide Camillo and Carl George for their careful reading and helpful editing. We also thank our entire Board of Directors and Advisory Council and a number of other people outside the organization for their advice and comments. We are thankful for the design talents of Jack Graber, and the production talents of Miller Printing, Amsterdam, New York. We thank Steve Signell and Frontier Spatial for the concept of the front cover design, and illustrator David Kiphuth for the inside illustration of the Park at a Crossroad. FUNDING SUPPORT The Adirondack Park at a Crossroad: A Road Map for Action is made possible by the generous financial support of the following organizations and individuals: The Bay and Paul Foundations Artwork by David Kiphuth Overhills Foundation Adirondack Wild: Friends of the Forest Preserve builds upon The Camp Fire Conservation Fund the work of hundreds of spirited men and women who have Furthermore: A program of the J.M. Kaplan Fund stood up for wilderness and the forest preserve − against tremendous odds − since 1885.
    [Show full text]
  • Silver Lake Wilderness Unit Management Plan Resolution March 9, 2006 Page 2
    New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Division of Lands and Forests SILVER LAKE WILDERNESS AREA Silver Lake Wilderness Sacandaga Primitive Area Cathead Mountain Primitive Area UNIT MANAGEMENT PLAN April 2006 GEORGE E. PATAKI, Governor DENISE M. SHEEHAN, Commissioner THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Silver Lake Wilderness Area Silver Lake Wilderness Sacandaga Primitive Area Cathead Mountain Primitive Area Unit Management Plan April 2006 New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Division of Lands & Forests 625 Broadway Albany, NY 12233-4254 (518) 473-9518 www.dec.state.ny.us THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK MEMORANDUM TO: The Record FROM: Denise M. Sheehan SUBJECT: Silver Lake Wilderness Area Final Unit Management Plan (Final UMP) The Final UMP for the Silver Lake Wilderness Area Final Unit Management Plan (Final UMP) has been completed. The Final UMP is consistent with the guidelines and criteria of the Adirondack Park State Land Master Plan, the State Constitution, Environmental Conservation Law, and Department rules, regulations and policies. The Final UMP/FEIS includes management objectives and a five year budget and is hereby approved and adopted. RESOLUTION ADOPTED BY THE ADIRONDACK PARK AGENCY WITH RESPECT TO SILVER LAKE WILDERNESS, SACANDAGA PRIMITIVE AND CATHEAD MOUNTAIN PRIMITIVE AREAS UNIT MANAGEMENT PLAN March 9, 2006 WHEREAS, Section 816 of the Adirondack Park Agency Act directs the Department of Environmental Conservation to develop, in consultation with the Adirondack Park Agency, individual
    [Show full text]
  • China Protected Areas Leadership Alliance Project
    China Protected Areas Leadership Alliance Project Strengthening Leadership Capacity for Effective Management of China’s Protected Areas YEAR III A partnership of the China State Forestry Administration The Nature Conservancy China Program East-West Center 10 May—8 June 2010 Table of Contents Executive Summary………………………………………………………………………………….…..…1 Map of China Model National Nature Reserves ………………………………………………………...…5 Descriptions of China’s 51 Model National Nature Reserves…………………………………..….………7 Training Needs for Protected Area Managers……………………………………………………….….…..20 Year III Participants……………….…………..………………………………………………….………...22 Participant Contact Information………………………………………………..…………….…….…….....31 Classroom Training Schedule, Beijing Forestry University ….……………………………………...…….34 Overview of Field Study and Collaborative Learning Component………......……………….……..…..….36 Map of U.S. Study Tour……………………….………………………………………………………..…..41 U.S. Field Study Agenda………………………………………………………………………...….………43 U.S. Field Study Organizations & Speakers……………………………………………….………..……...58 U.S. Field Study Speaker Contact Information……………………………………………………………..81 Project Staff ……………………………………….……………………………………………………......87 Project Staff Contact Information……………………………………………………………………….......90 Executive Summary Protection of the natural and cultural heritage of China depends on the effective management of the nation’s protected areas. The Government of China has set aside fifteen percent of its land as “protected areas,” including nature reserves and national parks. These protected
    [Show full text]