DOCSLIB.ORG

Paraíba State, Brazil

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Agriculture Global Practice TecHNICAL Assistance PAPER PARAÍBA STATE, BRAZIL AGRICULTURAL SECTOR RISK ASSESSMENT Diego Arias and Jorge Caballero WORLD BANK GROUP REPORT 100993-BR November 2015 THE WORLD BANK GROUP PARAÍBA STATE AGRICULTURE SECTOR RISK ANALYSIS Volume 1: Risk Assessment Volume 2: Risk Management Strategy © 2015 World Bank Group 1818 H Street NW Washington, DC 20433 Telephone: 202-473-1000 Internet: www.worldbank.org Email: [email protected] All rights reserved This volume is a product of the staff of the World Bank Group. The findings, interpretations, and conclusions expressed in this paper do not necessarily reflect the views of the Executive Directors of the World Bank Group or the governments they represent. The World Bank Group does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this work. The boundaries, colors, denominations, and other information shown on any map in this work do not imply any judgment on the part of the World Bank Group concerning the legal status of any territory or the endorsement or acceptance of such boundaries. Rights and Permissions The material in this publication is copyrighted. Copying and/or transmitting portions or all of this work without permission may be a violation of applicable law. World Bank Group encourages dissemination of its work and will normally grant permission to reproduce portions of the work promptly. For permission to photocopy or reprint any part of this work, please send a request with complete information to the Copyright Clearance Center, Inc., 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923, USA, telephone: 978-750-8400, fax: 978-750-4470, http://www.copyright.com/. All other queries on rights and licenses, including subsidiary rights, should be addressed to the Office of the Publisher, World Bank Group, 1818 H Street NW, Washington, DC 20433, USA, fax: 202-522-2422, e-mail: [email protected]. Cover images from left to right: Julio Pantoja, World Bank; Shell; Benjamin Thompson. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This report was prepared by the Team on Agriculture Sector Risk Management within the Agriculture Global Practice of the World Bank. The team was led by Diego Arias (GAGDR) and relied on technical support from Barbara Farinelli (GAGDR), Pablo Valdivia (GAGDR), and Sophie Storm (GAGDR). The international consultants that participated in the making of this report: Jorge Caballero (Main Consultant – GAGDR), Decio Gazzoni (Consultant - GAGDR), Jaime Estupiñan (Consultant - GAGDR) and Vitor Ozaki (Consultant - GAGDR). The Team would like to thank all those involved in the making of this report of the diverse sectors of the State Secretariat for Agriculture, Livestock and Aquiculture Development (SEDAP) for their invaluable contributions and enrichment of the document in their respective fields. The Team would also like to thank Mônica Alexandra Tavares de Melo and Ricardo Arlington from Project Cooperar, SEDAP, for their valuable on the ground field work that constantly contributed to creating a practical dimension of the technical discussions. Also, the team would like to express gratitude towards the different representatives of the value chains of the agriculture sector (producers, banks, processing firms, traders, exporters, amidst others), which contributed with their experience and knowledge regarding the sector, which allowed for a fuller and more comprehensive understanding of the reality of the diverse sectors. Asa Giertz (GAGDR) and David Tuschneider (GAGDR) met with the mission in various moments throughout the making and review of final version of this report. The Team extends their gratitude to them for their valuable contributions. This volume is product of the staff and consultants of the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank. The findings, interpretations, and conclusions expressed in this volume do not necessarily reflect the views of the Executive Directors of The World Bank or the governments they represent. The World Bank does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this work. The boundaries, colors, denominations, and other information shown on any map in this work do not imply any judgment on the part of The World Bank concerning the legal status of any territory or the endorsement or acceptance of such boundaries. ii CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ...................................................................................................................................... ii CONTENTS ............................................................................................................................................................. iii ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS ................................................................................................................. vi LIST OF TABLES ................................................................................................................................................... xi LIST OF FIGURES ................................................................................................................................................ xiii LIST OF TEXT BOXES ..........................................................................................................................................xv EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................................................ I INTRODUCTION AND CONTEXT .........................................................................................................................1 VOLUME 1: RISK ASSESSMENT ........................................................................................................................4 Chapter 1: PARAIBA’S AGRICULTURAL SYSTEM ............................................................................................5 Agriculture Sector Overview and Performance ......................................................................................................5 Agro-Climatic Conditions ......................................................................................................................................8 Agricultural Production and Market Trends .........................................................................................................10 Chapter 2: AGRICULTURE SECTOR RISKS ........................................................................................................12 Sugar Cane Supply Chain .....................................................................................................................................15 Overview of supply chain .................................................................................................................................15 Production risks – Climate risks .......................................................................................................................16 Production risks - Pests and diseases ................................................................................................................18 Price volatility risks. .........................................................................................................................................18 Enabling environment risks. .............................................................................................................................20 Fruticulture Sector ................................................................................................................................................20 Overview of Subsector .....................................................................................................................................20 Production Risks - Climate ...............................................................................................................................21 Production risks – Pests and diseases ...............................................................................................................22 Price volatility risk. ..........................................................................................................................................23 Family Agriculture in Semi-arid Zone .................................................................................................................25 Overview of Subsector .....................................................................................................................................25 Production risks - Climate ................................................................................................................................26 Production risks - Pests and diseases ................................................................................................................28 Price volatility risk. ..........................................................................................................................................29 iii Livestock Production Chains ................................................................................................................................31 Overview of Subsector and Supply Chain Profile ............................................................................................31 Production risks - Climate ................................................................................................................................33 Chapter 3: ADVERSE IMPACTS OF AGRICULTURAL RISKS .........................................................................37 Indicative
Recommended publications
  • Roraima State Site Profiling. Boa Vista and Pacaraima, Roraima State

    Roraima State Site Profiling. Boa Vista and Pacaraima, Roraima State

    Roraima State Site Profiling October 2018 Boa Vista and Pacaraima, Roraima State, Brazil Background and Methodology Sites overview Demographics In support of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR), REACH Assessed sites: 8 53% male / 47% female 1+28+4+7+7 is conducting monthly assessments in managed sites in Roraima state, in order to assist 1+30+5+8+9 humanitarian planning and response. These factsheets present an overview of conditions in # of individuals: 3,872 1% 0ver 60 1% sites located in Boa Vista and Pacaraima towns in October 2018. A mixed methodology was Boa Vista: 3,444 used to gather information, with primary data collection conducted through direct observations Pacaraima: 428 30% 18 - 59 28% between 29 and 30 of October 2018 as well as 8 Key Informant (KI) interviews conducted with 5% 12 - 17 4% actors working on the sites. Further, secondary data provided by UNHCR KI and the Brazilian # of households: 1,527* Armed Forces were used to analyse selected key indicators. Given the dynamic situation in Avg household size: 3 8% 5 - 11 7% Boa Vista and Pacaraima, information should only be considered as relevant to the month of assessment using the most updated UNHCR data available as of the end of the month. Planned capacity: 4,172 9% 0 - 4 7% !(Pacaraima *Estimated by assuming an average household size, !( ¥Sites assessed in Boa Vista based on data from previous rounds in the same location. Boa Vista Cauamé Brazil Roraima State Cauamé União São Francisco Jardim Floresta ÔÆ Tancredo Neves Silvio Leite Nova Canaã ÔÆ ÔÆ Pintolândia São Vicente ÔÆ ÔÆ ÔÆ Centenário ÔÆ Rondon 1 Pintolândia Rondon 3 ¥Site assessed in Pacaraima Nova Cidade Venezuela Suapi Jardim Florestal Brazil Vila Nova Janokoida ÔÆ Das Orquídeas Vila Velha Ilzo Montenegro Da Balança ² ² km m 0 1,5 3 0 500 1.000 Fundo de População das Nações Unidas União Europeia Roraima site profiling October 2018 Jardim Floresta Boa Vista, Roraima State, Brazil Lat.
  • Baixar [137.07

    Baixar [137.07

    ESTADO DA PARAIBA SECRETARIA DE ESTADO DA SAÚDE 2º REGIÃO DE SAÚDE -GUARABIRA Data: 18/06/2019 Hora: 8:30 Local: Bananeiras PAUTA DA 5ª REUNIÃO DA ASSEMBLEIA ORDINÁRIA DA COMISSÃO INTERGETORES PIEMONT DA BORBOREMA -2019 1. ABERTURA 1.1 Acolhimento 2. APRESENTAÇÃO 2.1 Deliberar pela aprovação a ata da reunião de Maio 2019. 3. DELIBERAÇÕES 1. Deliberar para aprovação os ajustes para prevenir suspensão de recursos do Programa de Atenção Básica-PAB, devido a rotatividade de profissionais na 2ª Região de Saúde Encaminhamento:__________________________________________________________ 2. Deliberar para aprovação a adesão ao Sistema DigiSUS Gestor/ Módulo Planejamento – DGMP, conforme a Portaria 750 de 29 de abril de 2019 obedecendo os perfis para liberação de acesso (http://digisusgmp.saude.gov.br/) Encaminhamento:__________________________________________________________ 3. Deliberar para aprovação meios de acompanhamento da alimentação do SIOPS dos municípios da 2ª RS. Encaminhamento:__________________________________________________________ 4. Deliberar para aprovação a prestação de contas sobre a realização de cirurgias eletivas 2019 no HRG (Gilson Cândido) Encaminhamento:__________________________________________________________ 5. Deliberar para aprovação a prestação de contas sobre cirurgias de catarata realizadas em Areia (Alcione) Encaminhamento:__________________________________________________________ 6. Deliberar para aprovação a contrapartida dos municípios para a realização da Ação Rede Cuidar, em 18 de julho, na 2ª Região de Saúde. Encaminhamento:__________________________________________________________ 7. Deliberar para aprovação a mudança de modalidade NASF-AB, de 3 para modalidade 2, do Município de Borborema/PB. (Thalita) Encaminhamento:__________________________________________________________ 8. Deliberar para aprovação de prazo para atualização do sistema de informação hospitalar (SIHD) com fins de comprovação de execução da PPI de procedimentos de obstetrícia realizadas no município de Cacimba de Dentro como executor no período de 2018 e 2019.
  • Exploratory Temporal and Spatial Distribution Analysis of Dengue Notifications in Boa Vista, Roraima, Brazilian Amazon, 1999-2001†

    Exploratory Temporal and Spatial Distribution Analysis of Dengue Notifications in Boa Vista, Roraima, Brazilian Amazon, 1999-2001†

    Exploratory Temporal and Spatial Distribution Analysis of Dengue Notifications in Boa Vista, Roraima, Brazilian Amazon, 1999-2001† by Maria Goreti Rosa-Freitas*, Pantelis Tsouris**#, Alexander Sibajev***, Ellem Tatiani de Souza Weimann**, Alexandre Ubirajara Marques**, Rodrigo Lopes Ferreira** and José Francisco Luitgards-Moura*** *Laboratório de Transmissores de Hematozoários, Departamento de Entomologia, Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, Av. Brasil 4365, Manguinhos, 21045-900 Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil **Núcleo Avançado de Vetores – Convênio FIOCRUZ-UFRR BR 174 S/N - Boa Vista, RR, Brasil ***Centro de Ciências Biológicas e da Saúde, UFRR, BR 174 S/N - Boa Vista, RR, Brasil Abstract In Brazil, as in the rest of the world, dengue has become the most important arthropod-borne viral disease of public health significance. Roraima state presented the highest dengue incidence coefficient in Brazil in the last few years (224.9 and 164.2 per 10,000 inhabitants in 2000 and 2001, respectively). The capital, Boa Vista, reports the highest number of dengue cases in Roraima. This study examined the temporal and spatial distribution of dengue in Boa Vista during the years 1999- 2001, based on daily notifications as recorded by local health authorities. Temporally, dengue notifications were analysed by weekly and monthly averages and age distribution and correlated to meteorological variables. Spatially, dengue coefficients, premises infestation indices, population density and income levels were allocated in a geographical information system using, Boa Vista 49 neighbourhoods as units. Dengue outbreaks displayed distinct year-to-year distribution patterns that were neither periodical nor significantly correlated to any meteorological variable. There were no preferences for age and sex.
  • Um Estudo Sobre Amapá E Roraima

    Um Estudo Sobre Amapá E Roraima

    ISSN 1415-4765 TEXTO PARA DISCUSSÃO NO 683 Federalismo, Repasses Federais e Crescimento Econômico: um Estudo sobre Amapá e Roraima Bruno de Oliveira Cruz Carlos Wagner de Albuquerque Oliveira Brasília, novembro de 1999 ISSN 1415-4765 TEXTO PARA DISCUSSÃO NO 683 Federalismo, Repasses Federais e Crescimento Econômico: um Estudo sobre Amapá e Roraima* Bruno de Oliveira Cruz** Carlos Wagner de Albuquerque Oliveira** Brasília, novembro de 1999 * Os autores agradecem a Mônica Mora, Antônio Carlos Galvão, Herton Araújo, Nelson Zackseski, Maria Cris- tina Macdowell, Luciana Mendes, Salvador Viana e Humberto Watson pelos comentários, sugestões e auxílio para o término desta pesquisa. ** Pesquisadores da Diretoria de Políticas Regionais e Urbanas do IPEA. MINISTÉRIO DO PLANEJAMENTO, ORÇAMENTO E GESTÃO Martus Tavares – Ministro Guilherme Dias – Secretário Executivo Instituto de Pesquisa Econômica Aplicada Presidente Roberto Borges Martins DIRETORIA Eustáquio J. Reis Gustavo Maia Gomes Hubimaier Cantuária Santiago Luís Fernando Tironi Murilo Lôbo Ricardo Paes de Barros Fundação pública vinculada ao Ministério do Planejamento, Orçamento e Gestão, o IPEA fornece suporte técnico e institucional às ações governamentais e torna disponíves, para a sociedade, elementos necessários ao conhecimento e à solução dos problemas econômicos e sociais do país. Inúmeras políticas públicas e programas de desenvolvimento brasileiro são formulados a partir dos estudos e pesquisas realizados pelas equipes de especialistas do IPEA. TEXTO PARA DISCUSSÃO tem o objetivo de divulgar resultados de estudos desenvolvidos direta ou indiretamente pelo IPEA, bem como trabalhos considerados de relevância para disseminação pelo Instituto, para informar profissionais especializados e colher sugestões. Tiragem: 115 exemplares COORDENAÇÃO DO EDITORIAL Brasília – DF: SBS Q. 1, Bl.
  • Diario Oficial 17-04-2021.Pdf

    Diario Oficial 17-04-2021.Pdf

    DIÁRIOESTADO DA PARAÍBA OFICIAL Nº 17.347 João Pessoa - Sábado, 17 de Abril de 2021 R$ 2,00 confere o art. 86, inciso I, da Constituição do Estado, e tendo em vista o disposto no art. 9º, inciso II, ATOS DO PODER EXECUTIVO da Lei Complementar no 58, de 30 de dezembro de 2003, na Lei no 8.186, de 16 de março de 2007, e na Ato Governamental nº 1.853 João Pessoa, 16 de abril de 2021 Lei nº 9.332, de 25 de janeiro de 2011, R E S O L V E nomear LINDEMBERG GONCALVES LIMA para ocupar o O GOVERNADOR DO ESTADO DA PARAÍBA, no uso das atribuições que lhe cargo de provimento em comissão de DIRETOR DA CADEIA PUBLICA DE ESPERANCA, Símbolo conferem os incisos IV e VI do art. 86 da Constituição do Estado, CSP-5, da Secretaria de Estado da Administração Penitenciária. R E S O L V E nomear Isaias José Dantas Gualberto, como membro titular, em substituição a Agamenon Vieira da Silva, na vaga do Departamento Estadual de Trânsito da Paraíba Ato Governamental nº 1.860 João Pessoa, 16 de abril de 2021 - DETRAN-PB, até o término do atual mandato, biênio 2019/2021. O GOVERNADOR DO ESTADO DA PARAÍBA, no uso das atribuições que lhe Ato Governamental nº 1.854 João Pessoa, 16 de abril de 2021 confere o art. 86, inciso XX, da Constituição do Estado, e de acordo com artigo 33, inciso II, da Lei Complementar nº 58, de 30 de dezembro de 2003, O GOVERNADOR DO ESTADO DA PARAÍBA, no uso das atribuições que lhe R E S O L V E exonerar MARCELO CANDIDO DA COSTA, matrícula nº confere o art.
  • Chapter 3 the North- Lost in the Amazon

    Chapter 3 the North- Lost in the Amazon

    BRAZIL Chapter 3 The North- Lost in the Amazon Have you ever heard about Amazon rainforest? Let us learn together! The equatorial North, also known as the Amazon or Amazônia, is Brazil's largest region with total landmass of 3,869,638 square kilometers, covering 45.3 percent of the national territory. Way too big and enormous!! It is also the least inhabited part of the country. 31 BRAZIL The region has the largest rainforest of the world and is called Amazon. The word Amazon refers to the women warriors who once fought in inter-tribe in ancient times in this region of today's North Region of Brazil. It is also the name of one of the major river that passes through Brazil and flows eastward into South Atlantic. This river is also the largest of the world in terms of water carried in it. There are also numerous other rivers in the area. It is one fifth of all the earth's fresh water reserves. There are two main Amazonian cities: Manaus, capital of the State of Amazonas, and Belém, capital of the State of Pará. 32 BRAZIL Over half of the Amazon rainforest( more than 60 per cent) is located in Brazil but it is also located in other South American countries including Peru, Venezuela, Ecuador, Colombia, Guyana, Bolivia, Suriname and French Guiana. The Amazon is home to around two and a half million different insect species as well as over 40000 plant species. There are also a number of dangerous species living in the Amazon rainforest such as the “Onça Pintada” (Brazilian Puma) and anaconda.
  • From Roraima, Brazil: Species Composition, Distribution, and New Records

    From Roraima, Brazil: Species Composition, Distribution, and New Records

    14 1 21 ANNOTATED LIST OF SPECIES Check List 14 (1): 21–35 https://doi.org/10.15560/14.1.21 Freshwater shrimps (Crustacea, Decapoda, Caridea, Dendrobranchiata) from Roraima, Brazil: species composition, distribution, and new records Maria Aparecida Laurindo dos Santos,1 Patrícia Macedo de Castro,2, 3 Célio Magalhães4 1 Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Biologia de Água Doce e Pesca Interior. Av. André Araújo, 2936 - Petrópolis, 69067-375 Manaus, Amazonas, Brazil. 2 Universidade Estadual de Roraima, Pró-Reitoria de Pesquisa e Pós-Graduação. Rua Sete de Setembro, 231 - Canarinho, 69306-530, Boa Vista, RR, Brazil. 3 Museu Integrado de Roraima/IACTI-RR. Av. Brigadeiro Eduardo Gomes, 2868 – Pq. Anauá, 69305-010, Boa Vista, RR, Brazil. 4 Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia, Coordenação de Biodiversidade. Av. André Araújo, 2936 - Petrópolis, 69067-375, Manaus, AM, Brazil Corresponding author: Célio Magalhães, [email protected] Abstract This work provides an update on the species composition and distribution of freshwater shrimps from the state of Roraima, Brazil, based on material deposited in the Brazilian collections of the Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia (Manaus) and the Museu Integrado de Roraima (Boa Vista). A total of 12 species (1 Sergestidae, 3 Eury- rhynchidae, and 8 Palaemonidae) are listed, of which 7 (Acetes paraguayensis Hansen, 1919; Euryrhynchus ama- zoniensis Tiefenbacher, 1978; E. burchelli Calman, 1907; E. wrzesniowskii Miers, 1877; Palaemon yuna Carvalho, Magalhães & Mantelatto, 2014; Pseudopalaemon chryseus Kensley & Walker, 1982; and Ps. gouldingi Kensley & Walker, 1982) are recorded for the first time from the state of Roraima.
  • PARAÍBA Portaria Nº 1, De 31 De Março De 2021

    PARAÍBA Portaria Nº 1, De 31 De Março De 2021

    Estimativa Fundeb 2021 PARAÍBA Portaria nº 1, de 31 de março de 2021 Estimativa Total Complementação da União VAAF - 2021 (repasse mensal) Coef. de Receita Fundeb Janeiro a Março Abril Maio Junho a Julho Agosto a Dezembro Janeiro Complementação Municípios UF Distribuição 2021 2021 2021 2021 2021 2021 2022 Total (Port. 1/2021) (imp+compl.) Água Branca/PB PB 0,002561718083 8.353.007,59 26.748,26 76.851,54 87.430,95 76.851,54 65.236,26 127.837,35 852.248,99 Aguiar/PB PB 0,000986631846 3.217.115,64 10.301,95 29.598,96 33.673,56 29.598,96 25.125,39 49.235,86 328.239,08 Alagoa Grande/PB PB 0,005191041394 16.926.455,91 54.202,42 155.731,24 177.169,26 155.731,24 132.194,13 259.048,40 1.726.989,33 Alagoa Nova/PB PB 0,003319358890 10.823.450,95 34.659,19 99.580,77 113.289,09 99.580,77 84.530,20 165.645,88 1.104.305,85 Alagoinha/PB PB 0,002987688799 9.741.972,54 31.196,05 89.630,66 101.969,25 89.630,66 76.083,95 149.094,55 993.963,69 Alcantil/PB PB 0,001382266883 4.507.164,88 14.432,98 41.468,01 47.176,51 41.468,01 35.200,56 68.979,23 459.861,51 Algodão de Jandaíra/PB PB 0,000771566328 2.515.850,37 8.056,33 23.146,99 26.333,41 23.146,99 19.648,57 38.503,45 256.689,69 Alhandra/PB PB 0,003725568077 12.147.979,38 38.900,64 111.767,04 127.152,93 111.767,04 94.874,65 185.916,92 1.239.446,16 Amparo/PB PB 0,000645485467 2.104.737,85 6.739,86 19.364,56 22.030,30 19.364,56 16.437,82 32.211,64 214.744,29 Aparecida/PB PB 0,001404339701 4.579.137,83 14.663,46 42.130,19 47.929,85 42.130,19 35.762,66 70.080,73 467.204,84 Araçagi/PB PB 0,003380030248 11.021.282,36
  • Valor Destinado Aos Municípios Da Repatriação De Recursos Do Exterior

    Valor Destinado Aos Municípios Da Repatriação De Recursos Do Exterior

    Valor destinado aos Municípios da Repatriação de recursos do exterior Município UF Capital Região Valor Água Branca/PB PB . Nordeste 493.337,38 Aguiar/PB PB . Nordeste 493.337,38 Alagoa Grande/PB PB . Nordeste 1.151.120,54 Alagoa Nova/PB PB . Nordeste 986.674,75 Alagoinha/PB PB . Nordeste 822.228,96 Alcantil/PB PB . Nordeste 493.337,38 Algodão de Jandaíra/PB PB . Nordeste 493.337,38 Alhandra/PB PB . Nordeste 986.674,75 Amparo/PB PB . Nordeste 493.337,38 Aparecida/PB PB . Nordeste 493.337,38 Araçagi/PB PB . Nordeste 986.674,75 Arara/PB PB . Nordeste 657.783,17 Araruna/PB PB . Nordeste 986.674,75 Areia de Baraúnas/PB PB . Nordeste 493.337,38 Areia/PB PB . Nordeste 986.674,75 Areial/PB PB . Nordeste 493.337,38 Aroeiras/PB PB . Nordeste 986.674,75 Assunção/PB PB . Nordeste 493.337,38 Baía da Traição/PB PB . Nordeste 493.337,38 Bananeiras/PB PB . Nordeste 986.674,75 Baraúna/PB PB . Nordeste 493.337,38 Barra de Santa Rosa/PB PB . Nordeste 822.228,96 Barra de Santana/PB PB . Nordeste 493.337,38 Barra de São Miguel/PB PB . Nordeste 493.337,38 Bayeux/PB PB . Nordeste 2.466.686,88 Belém do Brejo do Cruz/PB PB . Nordeste 493.337,38 Belém/PB PB . Nordeste 986.674,75 Bernardino Batista/PB PB . Nordeste 493.337,38 Boa Ventura/PB PB . Nordeste 493.337,38 Boa Vista/PB PB . Nordeste 493.337,38 Bom Jesus/PB PB . Nordeste 493.337,38 Bom Sucesso/PB PB .
  • Indigenous Protagonism in Roraima and Environment Guardianship Inside the São Marcos Indigenous Land

    Indigenous Protagonism in Roraima and Environment Guardianship Inside the São Marcos Indigenous Land

    http://dx.doi.org/10.18623/rvd.v13i26.671 INDIGENOUS PROTAGONISM IN RORAIMA AND ENVIRONMENT GUARDIANSHIP INSIDE THE SÃO MARCOS INDIGENOUS LAND Serguei Aily Franco de Camargo Doctor of Aquaculture at the São Paulo State University of Júlio de Mesquita Filho (UNESP). Master of Resource Conservation and Management at the São Paulo State University of Júlio de Mesquita Filho (UNESP). Law Professor at Estácio Atual Faculty (Boa Vista, RR). Professor at the Post Graduation Program in Fishing Sciences in the Tropics at the Federal University of Amazonas. Email: [email protected] Edson Damas da Silveira Doctor of Economic and Social-environmental Law at the Pontifical Catholic University of Paraná (PUCPR). Master of Anthropology at the Federal University of Pernambuco (UFPE) and of Economic and Social Law at the Pontifical Catholic University of Paraná (PUCPR). Law Professor at Estácio Atual Faculty in the Amazon. Professor of Indigenous Law in the Law Course at Cathedral Faculty in Boa Vista. Public Prosecutor at the Public Prosecution Office of the State of Roraima. Email: [email protected] ABSTRACT This paper presents a case study about an environmental lawsuit proposed by an indigenous citizen and signed by an indigenous lawyer aiming at preserving the environment inside the Indigenous Land of São Marcos, near Pacaraima city seat, at the border of the Indigenous Community of Ouro Preto. The case is about the irregular disposal of solid waste by the city seat inside the indigenous land and within the limits of the community where the tuxaua author of lawsuit lives. The objective of the paper is to check whether the judicialization of this environmental claim resulted in the maturation of the indigenous movement pointed out by the exercise of the full protagonism in solving problems arising from the relationship with the Brazilian State.
  • FOOD ASSISTANCE FACT SHEET BRAZIL Updated April 20, 2020

    FOOD ASSISTANCE FACT SHEET BRAZIL Updated April 20, 2020

    FOOD ASSISTANCE FACT SHEET BRAZIL Updated April 20, 2020 The ongoing political and economic crisis in Venezuela has driven more than five million Venezuelans to flee the country since 2014, including approximately 250,000 Venezuelans who are sheltering in Brazil. SITUATION • Deteriorating political and economic conditions in Venezuela— characterized by extreme hyperinflation and a severe lack of financial means to access food and medicine—have contributed to increasing humanitarian needs, triggering an influx of Venezuelans into Brazil, as well as other countries in the region. • As of November 2019, more than 250,000 Venezuelans—many of whom remain in need of food assistance—were sheltering in Brazil, according to the Regional Interagency Coordination Platform for Refugees and Migrants from Venezuela (R4V). The population influx is straining the capacity of the Government of Brazil (GoB) to provide services in areas of the country bordering Venezuela, particularly in Roraima and Amazonas states. • In 2018, the GoB established a voluntary relocation program for Venezuelans intending to remain in Brazil. The GoB—with support from relief actors—facilitates the voluntary resettlement of Venezuelans from Amazonas and Roraima to other areas across Brazil FOOD FOR PEACE CONTRIBUTIONS to reduce the impact of population flows on the border regions and TOTAL CONTRIBUTIONS PER FISCAL YEAR (FY) provide better socioeconomic opportunities for refugees and migrants. U.S. DOLLARS METRIC TONS* FY 2019 $5.8 million — FY 2018 $2.0 million — FY 2017 — — *Metric tonnage does not reflect funding for vouchers or cash transfers RESPONSE USAID’s Office of Food for Peace (FFP) partners with the Adventist Food Vouchers 85% Development and Relief Agency (ADRA) to provide food vouchers and locally procured food aid to approximately 21,450 vulnerable Venezuelans and host community members sheltering in Amaz onas, Local, Regional, and International Bahia, Minas Gerais, Paraná, Rio Grande do Sul, and Roraima states.
  • PARAÍBA População (Fonte: Participação Código Seq UF Município IBGE, Ref

    PARAÍBA População (Fonte: Participação Código Seq UF Município IBGE, Ref

    PL 5478/2019 - DISTRIBUIÇÃO DOS BÔNUS AOS MUNICÍPIOS COM BASE NOS COEFICIENTES DO FPM (Art 1º, Inciso III) Estado: PB - PARAÍBA População (fonte: Participação Código Seq UF Município IBGE, ref. Relativa no Total Distribuição IBGE 01/07/2018) Geral 1 250010 PB Água Branca (*) 10.161 0,01142770% 607.031,02 2 250020 PB Aguiar 5.571 0,00857077% 455.273,26 3 250030 PB Alagoa Grande 28.623 0,01999847% 1.062.304,28 4 250040 PB Alagoa Nova 20.589 0,01714155% 910.546,53 5 250050 PB Alagoinha 14.367 0,01428462% 758.788,77 6 250053 PB Alcantil 5.473 0,00857077% 455.273,26 7 250057 PB Algodão de Jandaíra 2.488 0,00857077% 455.273,26 8 250060 PB Alhandra 19.391 0,01714155% 910.546,53 9 250073 PB Amparo 2.227 0,00857077% 455.273,26 10 250077 PB Aparecida 8.337 0,00857077% 455.273,26 11 250080 PB Araçagi 17.079 0,01714155% 910.546,53 12 250090 PB Arara 13.438 0,01142770% 607.031,02 13 250100 PB Araruna 20.215 0,01714155% 910.546,53 14 250110 PB Areia 22.978 0,01714155% 910.546,53 15 250115 PB Areia de Baraúnas 2.140 0,00857077% 455.273,26 16 250120 PB Areial 6.935 0,00857077% 455.273,26 17 250130 PB Aroeiras 19.190 0,01714155% 910.546,53 18 250135 PB Assunção 3.870 0,00857077% 455.273,26 19 250140 PB Baía da Traição 8.933 0,00857077% 455.273,26 20 250150 PB Bananeiras 21.210 0,01714155% 910.546,53 21 250153 PB Baraúna 4.831 0,00857077% 455.273,26 22 250160 PB Barra de Santa Rosa 15.268 0,01428462% 758.788,77 23 250157 PB Barra de Santana 8.249 0,00857077% 455.273,26 24 250170 PB Barra de São Miguel 5.939 0,00857077% 455.273,26 25 250180 PB Bayeux 96.550