Snps As Co-Morbid Factors for Drug Abuse and Ischemic Heart Disease

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Snps As Co-Morbid Factors for Drug Abuse and Ischemic Heart Disease Techno e lo en g y Al-Haggar, Gene Technology 2014, 3:1 G Gene Technology DOI: 10.4172/2329-6682.1000107 ISSN: 2329-6682 Review Article Open Access SNPs as Co-morbid Factors for Drug Abuse and Ischemic Heart Disease Mohammad Al-Haggar* Pediatrics and Genetics, Mansoura University Children's Hospital (MUCH), 35516 Mansoura, Egypt Abstract Drug abuse is a major health and social problem that may be associated with morbidity and mortality. It is considered by many societies as an antisocial or even criminal behavior. Susceptibility to addiction is multifactorial with complex genetic basis characterized by phenotypic and genetic heterogeneity. Candidate genes are those concerned with action and metabolism of abused drug or those that encode neurotransmitter systems. Comorbidity means the concomitance or sequential development of two disorders in one cohort. High prevalence of comorbidities does not mean that one condition caused the other, even if one appeared first. Neurocardiac involvement may be in the form of the heart’s effects on the brain as in embolic stroke as a sequel of cardiac disease, the brain’s effects on the heart as in neurogenic heart disease, and neurocardiac syndromes like Friedreich's ataxia. Recently, increasing evidences suggest genetic and epigenetic factors as a cause of comorbidity. Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) is the most interesting risk factor that could explain the personal variation in disease susceptibility especially the multifactorial comorbid disorders. In this article, we will review the role SNPs as a risk factor for the comorbidity of drug abuse and ischemic heart disease. Keywords: Substance abuse; Ischemicheart; SNPs these factors may influence the comorbidity, many studies are currently focusing on the role SNPs as risk factor. Introduction In this article, we are review the role SNPs as a risk factor for the Drug abuse is a major concern that impacts all levels of society [1]. comorbidity of drug abuse and ischemic heart disease whatever who Generally, drug abuse is considered by many societies, an antisocial or comes first. even criminal behavior. Drug abuse is a major health and social issue for its morbidity and mortality, individual and society cost, violence Biological components of substance abuse and legal problems involvement. It is widely known that dependence on Drug/substance abuse and dependence are complex phenomena drugs of abuse is moderately to strongly heritable but, the susceptibility that defy simple explanation or description. The abusive use of to addiction has a complex genetic basis characterized by phenotypic addictive drugs is a medical and social problem as old as recorded and genetic heterogeneity. Candidate genes are both specific genes, human history. Ancient references to drug abuse may be found in the related to action and metabolism of drug of abuse, and non-specific oral and written traditions of virtually all ethnic and cultural groups genes that encode neurotransmitter systems that could influence the on the planet [6]. One of the most striking features of drug addiction biological activity of the drug [2]. is how few chemicals are subject to abuse. Among all congeners of all When two disorders or illnesses occur simultaneously in the same known chemicals, approximately 30,000,000 chemical substances, yet, person, they are called comorbid. Surveys show that drug abuse and only approximately 100 (including nicotine, ethanol, psychostimulants, other mental illnesses are often comorbid. Six out of ten people with a opiates, barbiturates, benzodiazepines and cannabinoids) are addictive substance use disorder also suffer from another form of mental illness. which is a stunningly small subset of the overall chemicals [7]. Many But the high prevalence of these comorbidities does not mean that one contributing factors including the actions and effects the drug could condition caused the other, even if one appeared first. In fact, there are underlie the substance abuse and dependence. In order to understand at least three scenarios that should be considered; (1) drug abuse can substance abuse disorder one must first understand how drugs work in cause a mental illness,(2) mental illness can lead to drug abuse, and (3) the brain, why certain drugs have the potential for abuse, and what, if drug abuse and mental disorders are both caused by other common any, biological differences exist among individuals in their susceptibility risk factors. In reality, all three scenarios can contribute, in varying to abuse drugs [8]. degrees, to the establishment of specific comorbid mental disorders and The earlier onset of drug intake is associated with greater likelihood addiction [3]. Although a variety of diseases commonly co-occur with of development of substance use problems. However, there is debate drug abuse and addiction (e.g. HIV, hepatitis C, cancer, cardiovascular about whether early onset uniquely affects brain development in such disease), most researches in this era focus only on the comorbidity of a way as to promote pathological behavior or whether the same genetic drug use disorders and other mental illnesses [3]. Neurocardiology has and environmental factors that make an individual likely to develop many dimensions and can be divided into three major categories: the drug problems also make them likely to initiate early [9]. In the U.K. and heart’s eff ects on the brain e.g. cardiac source embolic stroke, the brain’s North America, the understanding of addiction has been dominated by effects on the heart e.g. neurogenic heart disease, and neurocardiac syndromes e.g. Friedreich's disease [4]. In recent years, increasing evidences suggest that genetic and *Corresponding author: Prof. Mohammad Al-Haggar, Pediatrics and Genetics, epigenetic factors could be involved in disease comorbidity. Given Mansoura University Children's Hospital (MUCH), 35516 Mansoura, Egypt, the central role of the genome and proteome in biology and patho- Tel: +20-50-2310661/+2-011117-15350; Fax: +20-50-2234092; E-mail: [email protected] biology, it is safe to predict that misregulation of specific gene(s) and gene expression defects could influence the disease state and hence play Received January 20, 2014; Accepted February 06, 2014; Published February 10, 2014 a role in co-morbid disorders. Genes and Gene expression products are essential for the development and function of the brain and heart. Citation: Al-Haggar M (2014) SNPs as Co-morbid Factors for Drug Abuse and Ischemic Heart Disease. Gene Technology 3: 107. doi: 10.4172/2329- DNA, SNPs, polymorphisms and changes in miRNA expression profiles 6682.1000107 leading to an increased risk for developing neurodegenerative disorders as well as heart failure [5]. Previous researches have demonstrated Copyright: © 2014 Al-Haggar M. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted genetic and environmental influences on drug use disorders and use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and cardiovascular risks separately, but there are less known about how source are credited. Gene Technology Volume 3 • Issue 1 • 1000107 ISSN: 2329-6682 GNT, an open access journal Citation: Al-Haggar M (2014) SNPs as Co-morbid Factors for Drug Abuse and Ischemic Heart Disease. Gene Technology 3: 107. doi: 10.4172/2329- 6682.1000107 Page 2 of 10 the disease theory and the social learning theory; implications of the Genetic components of substance abuse disease theory depend on the notion that addiction is caused by some irreversible deficiency or pathology and that treatment is, therefore, The abuse liability of a drug is a measure of the likelihood that primarily a medical concern. Certain conclusions inevitably follow its use will result in drug dependence. Many factors ultimately play a from such a premise: (1) abstinence is the only treatment goal, (2) loss role in an individual’s drug-taking behavior; nevertheless, the abuse of control is the hallmark feature, (3) patients are not responsible for potential of a drug is related to its intrinsic rewarding properties and/ their illness, (4) therapists tend to be medical practitioners, and, finally, or the neuroadaptive responses that result from its prolonged use. (5) community-based prevention will be ineffective [10]. Pharmacological drug criteria e.g. reinforcing effect, tolerance, and physical dependence are drug-related factors; reinforcing effect is There are 10 markers of substance dependence that translate the essential for significant abuse potential, whereas tolerance and physical biopsychosocial status of substance abuser; 1) Preoccupation with dependence are not absolutely required [14]. Liability is a measure drinking or taking drugs, 2) Salience of substance use behavior, 3) for the role genetic factor in multifactorial traits which is sometimes Compulsion to start using alcohol or drugs, 4) Planning alcohol- or drug- termed as heritability. There is no natural clear-cut gap between the related behaviors, 5) Maximizing the substance effect, 6) Narrowing of norm and pathology [15]. For instance, while the essence of addiction substance use repertoire, 7) Compulsion to continue using alcohol and is considered to be compulsive drug seeking and use [16], the diagnosis drugs, 8) Primacy of psychoactive effect, 9) Maintaining a constant of substance dependence is defined as the presence of any three or more state (of intoxication), 10) Expectations of need for substance use. Two of the seven symptoms, such as tolerance or taking substance often in biological factors contribute to substance abuse and addiction: the larger amounts than intended. None of the symptoms are necessary or effects drugs of abuse exert on the individual, and the biological status of sufficient for the diagnosis, which makes the definition of the threshold the individual taking drugs. The former relates to the acute mechanisms even more uncertain. This uncertainty is one of the reasons making of abused drug action in the brain and the long-term effects on chronic these disorders heterogeneous. Abuse liability is justified by the well exposure.
Recommended publications
  • Brain Networks Underlying Vulnerability and Resilience to Drug Addiction
    Brain networks underlying vulnerability and resilience to drug addiction Karen D. Erschea,b,1,2, Chun Menga,b,1,2, Hisham Ziauddeena,c, Jan Stochla,d, Guy B. Williamse, Edward T. Bullmorea,b,c, and Trevor W. Robbinsb,f aDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0SZ, United Kingdom; bBehavioural and Clinical Neuroscience Institute, Department of Psychology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3EB, United Kingdom; cCambridgeshire and Peterborough National Health Service Foundation Trust, Cambridge CB21 5EF, United Kingdom; dDepartment of Kinanthropology and Humanities, Charles University, 16252 Prague, Czech Republic; eDepartment of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3EB, United Kingdom; and fDepartment of Psychology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3EB, United Kingdom Edited by Joseph E. LeDoux, New York University, New York, NY, and approved May 8, 2020 (received for review February 11, 2020) Regular drug use can lead to addiction, but not everyone who Much of the neuroscientific research on resilience has been ex- takes drugs makes this transition. How exactly drugs of abuse amined in adolescence (10), which is a period of heightened interact with individual vulnerability is not fully understood, nor is vulnerability and neural plasticity (11). While studies of adoles- it clear how individuals defy the risks associated with drugs or cents are important to inform the development and imple- addiction vulnerability. We used resting-state functional MRI mentation of preventative strategies, we also need to understand (fMRI) in 162 participants to characterize risk- and resilience- how resilience operates in vulnerable adults as the compensatory related changes in corticostriatal functional circuits in individuals mechanisms that have been characterized in adolescents do not exposed to stimulant drugs both with and without clinically di- necessarily translate into adulthood.
    [Show full text]
  • Effects of Stress-Induced Depression on Parkinson's Disease
    Effects of stress-induced depression on Parkinson’s disease symptomatology A dissertation submitted to the Division of Research and Advanced Studies of the University of Cincinnati in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Ph.D.) in the Graduate Program in Neuroscience of the College of Medicine 2011 By Ann Marie Hemmerle B.S., University of Dayton Advisor: Kim B. Seroogy, Ph.D. Committee Chair: Neil Richtand, M.D., Ph.D. James P. Herman, Ph.D. Kathy Steece-Collier, Ph.D. Aaron Johnson, Ph.D. Abstract Parkinson’s disease (PD) is a chronic neurodegenerative disorder that primarily affects dopaminergic neurons of the nigrostriatal pathway resulting in debilitating motor symptoms. Parkinson’s patients also have a high risk of comorbid depression, though this aspect of the disorder is less well studied. Understanding the underlying pathology of the comorbidity is important in improving clinical treatments and the quality of life for PD patients. To address this issue, we have developed a new model combining the unilateral striatal 6-hydroxydopamine lesion model of PD with the chronic variable stress model (CVS) of depression. Dysfunction of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis and its relationship to depression symptomatology is well established. Stress dysfunction may also have a role in the etiology of preclinical PD non- motor symptoms, and later in the course of the disease, may worsen motor symptoms. The combined model allows us to test the hypothesis that experimental depression exacerbates PD symptoms and to ascertain the mechanisms behind the increased neuronal loss. In the first study, we examined several temporal paradigms of the combined model.
    [Show full text]
  • Brain Imaging
    Publications · Brochures Brain Imaging A Technologist’s Guide Produced with the kind Support of Editors Fragoso Costa, Pedro (Oldenburg) Santos, Andrea (Lisbon) Vidovič, Borut (Munich) Contributors Arbizu Lostao, Javier Pagani, Marco Barthel, Henryk Payoux, Pierre Boehm, Torsten Pepe, Giovanna Calapaquí-Terán, Adriana Peștean, Claudiu Delgado-Bolton, Roberto Sabri, Osama Garibotto, Valentina Sočan, Aljaž Grmek, Marko Sousa, Eva Hackett, Elizabeth Testanera, Giorgio Hoffmann, Karl Titus Tiepolt, Solveig Law, Ian van de Giessen, Elsmarieke Lucena, Filipa Vaz, Tânia Morbelli, Silvia Werner, Peter Contents Foreword 4 Introduction 5 Andrea Santos, Pedro Fragoso Costa Chapter 1 Anatomy, Physiology and Pathology 6 Elsmarieke van de Giessen, Silvia Morbelli and Pierre Payoux Chapter 2 Tracers for Brain Imaging 12 Aljaz Socan Chapter 3 SPECT and SPECT/CT in Oncological Brain Imaging (*) 26 Elizabeth C. Hackett Chapter 4 Imaging in Oncological Brain Diseases: PET/CT 33 EANM Giorgio Testanera and Giovanna Pepe Chapter 5 Imaging in Neurological and Vascular Brain Diseases (SPECT and SPECT/CT) 54 Filipa Lucena, Eva Sousa and Tânia F. Vaz Chapter 6 Imaging in Neurological and Vascular Brain Diseases (PET/CT) 72 Ian Law, Valentina Garibotto and Marco Pagani Chapter 7 PET/CT in Radiotherapy Planning of Brain Tumours 92 Roberto Delgado-Bolton, Adriana K. Calapaquí-Terán and Javier Arbizu Chapter 8 PET/MRI for Brain Imaging 100 Peter Werner, Torsten Boehm, Solveig Tiepolt, Henryk Barthel, Karl T. Hoffmann and Osama Sabri Chapter 9 Brain Death 110 Marko Grmek Chapter 10 Health Care in Patients with Neurological Disorders 116 Claudiu Peștean Imprint 126 n accordance with the Austrian Eco-Label for printed matters.
    [Show full text]
  • Personalized Treatment of Alcohol Dependence
    Curr Psychiatry Rep DOI 10.1007/s11920-012-0296-5 SUBSTANCE USE AND RELATED DISORDERS (JR MCKAY, SECTION EDITOR) Personalized Treatment of Alcohol Dependence Henry R. Kranzler & James R. McKay # Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012 Abstract Pharmacogenetic and adaptive treatment approaches Ondansetron . Sertraline . Adaptive trial designs . can be used to personalize care for alcohol-dependent patients. Adaptive protocol . Stepped care . Treatment algorithm Preliminary evidence shows that variation in the gene encoding the μ-opioid receptor moderates the response to naltrexone when used to treat alcohol dependence. Studies have also shown moderating effects of variation in the gene encoding Introduction the serotonin transporter on response to serotonergic treatment of alcohol dependence. Adaptive algorithms that modify alco- Traditionally, diagnostic tests and medical treatments have hol treatment based on patients’ progress have also shown been developed and evaluated using group data, a “one-size promise. Initial response to outpatient treatment appears to be fits all” approach that leaves little room for individual variation a particularly important in the selection of optimal continuing [1]. Personalized medicine, which uses individual features to care interventions. In addition, stepped-care algorithms can diagnose and treat disease, is of growing interest, having reduce the cost and burden of treatment while maintaining good produced notable successes in oncology and cardiology [2•, outcomes. Finally, matching treatment to specific problems 3]. To date, there have been fewer advances in the personalized present at intake or that emerge during treatment can also diagnosis and treatment of addictive disorders. However, on- improve outcomes. Although all of these effects require repli- going developments in genetics and pharmacogenetics and in cation and further refinement, the future of personalized care for the use of adaptive trial designs offer great potential to extend alcohol dependence appears bright.
    [Show full text]
  • Reinforcement-Based Cognitive Biases As Vulnerability Factors
    Reinforcement-based cognitive biases as vulnerability factors in alcohol addiction: From humans to animal models Karolina Noworyta1, Agata Cieslik1, and Rafal Rygula1 1Maj Institute of Pharmacology Polish Academy of Sciences March 15, 2021 Abstract Alcohol use disorder (AUD) is one of the most common but still poorly treated psychiatric conditions. Developing new treatments requires a better understanding of the aetiology of symptoms and evaluation of novel therapeutic targets in preclinical studies. Recent developments in our understanding of the reinforcement-based cognitive biases (RBCBs) that contribute to the development of AUD and its treatment offer new opportunities for both clinical and preclinical research. In this review, we first briefly describe psychological and cognitive theories that implicate various aspects of reinforcement sensitivity in the development, maintenance, and recurrence of alcohol addiction. Furthermore, in separate sections, we describe studies investigating RBCBs and their neural, neurochemical, and pharmacological correlates, and we discuss possible interactions between RBCBs and trajectories of AUD. Finally, we describe how recent translational studies using state-of-the-art animal models can facilitate our understanding of the role of reinforcement sensitivity and RBCBs in various aspects of AUD. Introduction Alcohol addiction is one of the biggest problems of modern society through its impact on health, social cohesion, crime, and its comorbidity with other neuropsychiatric disorders. Major advances in genetics and molecular neurobiology have led to the identification of many of the primary targets of alcohol and revealed neuroadaptations that develop with its chronic consumption. However, understanding pre-existing cognitive deficits that serve as substrates compounding the initiation of alcohol use and the development of alcohol use disorder (AUD) remains a major challenge.
    [Show full text]
  • A Nonlinear Relationship Between Cerebral Serotonin Transporter And
    The Journal of Neuroscience, March 3, 2010 • 30(9):3391–3397 • 3391 Cellular/Molecular A Nonlinear Relationship between Cerebral Serotonin Transporter and 5-HT2A Receptor Binding: An In Vivo Molecular Imaging Study in Humans David Erritzoe,1,3 Klaus Holst,3,4 Vibe G. Frokjaer,1,3 Cecilie L. Licht,1,3 Jan Kalbitzer,1,3 Finn Å. Nielsen,3,5 Claus Svarer,1,3 Jacob Madsen,2 and Gitte M. Knudsen1,3 1Neurobiology Research Unit and 2PET and Cyclotron Unit, University Hospital Rigshospitalet, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark, 3Center for Integrated Molecular Brain Imaging, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark, 4Department of Biostatistics, University of Copenhagen, DK-2200 Copenhagen, Denmark, and 5DTU Informatics, Technical University of Denmark, DK-2800 Lyngby, Denmark Serotonergic neurotransmission is involved in the regulation of physiological functions such as mood, sleep, memory, and appetite. Withintheserotonintransmittersystem,boththepostsynapticallylocatedserotonin2A(5-HT2A )receptorandthepresynapticserotonin transporter (SERT) are sensitive to chronic changes in cerebral 5-HT levels. Additionally, experimental studies suggest that alterations in either the 5-HT2A receptor or SERT level can affect the protein level of the counterpart. The aim of this study was to explore the covariation betweencerebral5-HT2A receptorandSERT invivointhesamehealthyhumansubjects.Fifty-sixhealthyhumansubjectswithameanage of 36 Ϯ 19 years were investigated. The SERT binding was imaged with [ 11C]3-amino-4-(2-dimethylaminomethyl-phenylsulfanyl)- 18 benzonitrile (DASB) and 5-HT2A receptor binding with [ F]altanserin using positron emission tomography. Within each individual, a regionalintercorrelationforthevariousbrainregionswasseenwithbothmarkers,mostnotablyfor5-HT2A receptorbinding.Aninverted U-shaped relationship between the 5-HT2A receptor and the SERT binding was identified. The observed regional intercorrelation for both the 5-HT2A receptor and the SERT cerebral binding suggests that, within the single individual, each marker has a set point adjusted through a common regulator.
    [Show full text]
  • Drugs, Brains, and Behavior: the Science of Addiction
    Drugs, Brains, and Behavior: The Science of Addiction A Research Update from the National Institute on Drug Abuse — January 2007 Is drug addiction a disease? Yes. Addiction is a chronic, relapsing disease that affects the brain and causes compulsive drug seeking and use despite harmful consequences. ¾ How is addiction a disease? Addiction is considered a brain disease because drugs change the brain—in structure and in function. It’s true that for most people, the initial decision to take drugs is voluntary. Over time, however, drug abuse can cause changes to the brain that erode a person’s self control and ability to make sound decisions, while sending intense impulses to take drugs. Many people today do not understand why individuals become addicted to drugs, or how drugs change the brain to foster ¾ What is its course? Drug addiction is a compulsive drug abuse. This new NIDA booklet aims to fill that chronic, relapsing disease––like diabetes, knowledge gap by providing scientific information about the asthma, or heart disease––and it can be disease of drug addiction, including the many harmful consequences and basic approaches to prevent and treat the managed successfully. Treatment helps people disease. http://www.drugabuse.gov/scienceofaddiction to counteract addiction’s powerful disruptive effects and regain control of their lives. And just as with other chronic diseases, relapses are not uncommon. But relapse does not signal failure—rather, it indicates that treatment should be reinstated or adjusted to help the addict fully recover. Why do some people become addicted, while others do not? No single factor can predict whether or not a person will become addicted to drugs.
    [Show full text]
  • [18F] Altanserin Bolus Injection in the Canine Brain Using PET Imaging
    Pauwelyn et al. BMC Veterinary Research (2019) 15:415 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12917-019-2165-5 RESEARCH ARTICLE Open Access Kinetic analysis of [18F] altanserin bolus injection in the canine brain using PET imaging Glenn Pauwelyn1*† , Lise Vlerick2†, Robrecht Dockx2,3, Jeroen Verhoeven1, Andre Dobbeleir2,5, Tim Bosmans2, Kathelijne Peremans2, Christian Vanhove4, Ingeborgh Polis2 and Filip De Vos1 Abstract 18 Background: Currently, [ F] altanserin is the most frequently used PET-radioligand for serotonin2A (5-HT2A) receptor imaging in the human brain but has never been validated in dogs. In vivo imaging of this receptor in the canine brain could improve diagnosis and therapy of several behavioural disorders in dogs. Furthermore, since dogs are considered as a valuable animal model for human psychiatric disorders, the ability to image this receptor in dogs could help to increase our understanding of the pathophysiology of these diseases. Therefore, five healthy laboratory beagles underwent a 90-min dynamic PET scan with arterial blood sampling after [18F] altanserin bolus injection. Compartmental modelling using metabolite corrected arterial input functions was compared with reference tissue modelling with the cerebellum as reference region. 18 Results: The distribution of [ F] altanserin in the canine brain corresponded well to the distribution of 5-HT2A receptors in human and rodent studies. The kinetics could be best described by a 2-Tissue compartment (2-TC) model. All reference tissue models were highly correlated with the 2-TC model, indicating compartmental modelling can be replaced by reference tissue models to avoid arterial blood sampling. Conclusions: This study demonstrates that [18F] altanserin PET is a reliable tool to visualize and quantify the 5- HT2A receptor in the canine brain.
    [Show full text]
  • Neurotrophic Factor Expression After CNS Viral Injury Produces Enhanced Sensitivity to Psychostimulants: Potential Mechanism for Addiction Vulnerability
    The Journal of Neuroscience, 2000, Vol. 20 RC104 1of5 Neurotrophic Factor Expression After CNS Viral Injury Produces Enhanced Sensitivity to Psychostimulants: Potential Mechanism for Addiction Vulnerability Marylou V. Solbrig,1 George F. Koob,2 Loren H. Parsons,2 Tomoko Kadota,3 Nigel Horscroft,1 Thomas Briese,1 and W. Ian Lipkin1 1Departments of Neurology, Microbiology, and Molecular Genetics, University of California-Irvine, Irvine, California 92697- 4292, 2Department of Neuropharmacology, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, California 92037, and 3Department of Anatomy, Chiba University School of Medicine, Chiba 260, Japan Hypothesized risk factors for psychostimulant, amphetamine, specific neurotrophin expression pattern triggered by striatal and cocaine abuse include dopamine (DA) receptor polymor- viral injury that increases tyrosine hydroxylase activity, an early phisms, HIV infection, schizophrenia, drug-induced paranoias, step in DA synthesis, to produce a phenotype of enhanced and movement disorders; however, the molecular, cellular, and amphetamine sensitivity. The reactive neurotrophin pattern pro- biochemical mechanisms that predispose to drug sensitivity or vides a molecular framework for understanding how CNS viral drive the development of addiction are incompletely under- injury, as well as other CNS adaptations producing similar stood. Using the Borna disease rat, an animal model of viral- growth factor activation profiles, may influence psychostimu- induced encephalopathy wherein sensitivity to the locomotor lant sensitivity. and stereotypic behavioral effects of D-amphetamine and co- Key words: virus; encephalitis; neurotrophin; Borna disease; caine is enhanced (Solbrig et al., 1994, 1998), we identify a rat; cocaine; amphetamine; dopamine There is increasing experimental evidence to support a role for with BDV are sensitive to the locomotor and stereotypic behav- neuronal growth factors in the CNS response to drug exposure ioral effects of D-amphetamine and cocaine (Solbrig et al., 1994, that outlasts the acute effects of drug.
    [Show full text]
  • A Unified Framework for Addiction: Vulnerabilities in the Decision Process
    BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES (2008) 31, 415–487 Printed in the United States of America doi:10.1017/S0140525X0800472X A unified framework for addiction: Vulnerabilities in the decision process A. David Redish Department of Neuroscience, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455 [email protected] http://umn.edu/~redish/ Steve Jensen Graduate Program in Computer Science, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455 [email protected] Adam Johnson Graduate Program in Neuroscience and Center for Cognitive Sciences, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455 [email protected] Abstract: The understanding of decision-making systems has come together in recent years to form a unified theory of decision-making in the mammalian brain as arising from multiple, interacting systems (a planning system, a habit system, and a situation-recognition system). This unified decision-making system has multiple potential access points through which it can be driven to make maladaptive choices, particularly choices that entail seeking of certain drugs or behaviors. We identify 10 key vulnerabilities in the system: (1) moving away from homeostasis, (2) changing allostatic set points, (3) euphorigenic “reward-like” signals, (4) overvaluation in the planning system, (5) incorrect search of situation-action-outcome relationships, (6) misclassification of situations, (7) overvaluation in the habit system, (8) a mismatch in the balance of the two decision systems, (9) over-fast discounting processes, and (10) changed learning rates. These vulnerabilities provide a taxonomy of potential problems with decision-making systems. Although each vulnerability can drive an agent to return to the addictive choice, each vulnerability also implies a characteristic symptomology. Different drugs, different behaviors, and different individuals are likely to access different vulnerabilities.
    [Show full text]
  • Radioactive Isotope* in Clinical Medicine and Research Final Programme & Abstracts Book
    AT0200334 Radioactive Isotope* in Clinical Medicine and Research ESHS-AT--0031 25th International Symposium 8-11 January, 2002 Bad Gasiein, Austria Final Programme & Abstracts Book Organized by The Austrian Society of Nuclear Medicine and the Departments of Nuclear Medicine and Biomedical Engineering & Physics, University of Vienna http://www. akh-wien. ac. at/bg2002 Merck - kompetent in der Schilddri Euthyrox Jodthyrox Novothyral •« Jodid Merck Fachinformation siehe Innenteil PLEASE BE AWARE THAT ALL OF THE MISSING PAGES IN THIS DOCUMENT WERE ORIGINALLY BLANK Mi^Jx-T^aoM iiiiiiiiii RADIOACTIVE ISOTOPES in Clinical Medicine and Research 25th International Symposium Bad Gastein Austria 8 to 11 January 2002 Organized by The Austrian Society of Nuclear Medicine (ÖGN) and the Departments of Nuclear Medicine and Biomedical Engineering & Physics, University of Vienna Final Programme & Abstracts Book JODID MERCK 100 ng-Tabletten • Zusammensetzung: 1 Tablette enthält 130,8 ng Kaliumjodid, entsprechend 100 (ig Jod. 84 mg Laktose, Magnesiumstearat Cellulose. Maisstärke. Anwen- dungsgebiete: Behandlung des Jodmangelkropfes bei Neugeborenen und Kindern. Gegenanzeigen: Überempfindlichkeit gegen Jod. Manifeste Schilddrüsenüberfunktion. Latente Schilddrüsen- Überfunktion bei Joddosen über 150 ug/Tag. Schwangerschaft und Stillperiode: Wählend der Schwangerschaft und Stillperiode soll die Jodzufuhr fortgesetzt werden. EUTHYROX 50 u.g, 75 ug, 100 ug, 125 ug. 150 ug-Tabletten • Zusammensetzung: 1 Euthyrox 50ng/75ug/100ug/125ug/150ug-Tablette enthält 50
    [Show full text]
  • Individual Differences in Nucleus Accumbens Dopamine Receptors Predict Development of Addiction-Like Behavior: a Computational Approach
    LETTER Communicated by A. David Redish Individual Differences in Nucleus Accumbens Dopamine Receptors Predict Development of Addiction-Like Behavior: A Computational Approach Payam Piray [email protected] Control and Intelligent Processing Center of Excellence, School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran Mohammad Mahdi Keramati keramati [email protected] School of Management and Economics, Sharif University of Technology, Tehran, Iran Amir Dezfouli [email protected] Caro Lucas [email protected] Control and Intelligent Processing Center of Excellence, School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran Azarakhsh Mokri [email protected] Department of Psychiatry, Roozbeh Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran, and Department of Clinical Sciences, Iranian National Center for Addiction Studies, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran Clinical and experimental observations show individual differences in the development of addiction. Increasing evidence supports the hy- pothesis that dopamine receptor availability in the nucleus accumbens (NAc) predisposes drug reinforcement. Here, modeling striatal-midbrain dopaminergic circuit, we propose a reinforcement learning model for ad- diction based on the actor-critic model of striatum. Modeling dopamine receptors in the NAc as modulators of learning rate for appetitive—but not aversive—stimuli in the critic—but not the actor—we define vulner- ability to addiction as a relatively lower learning rate for the appetitive stimuli, compared to aversive stimuli, in the critic. We hypothesize that an imbalance in this learning parameter used by appetitive and aversive learning systems can result in addiction. We elucidate that the interaction Mohammad Mahdi Keramati and Amir Dezfouli contributed equally to this work.
    [Show full text]