Cocaine-Research-Report.Pdf
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Methylphenidate Hydrochloride
Application for Inclusion to the 22nd Expert Committee on the Selection and Use of Essential Medicines: METHYLPHENIDATE HYDROCHLORIDE December 7, 2018 Submitted by: Patricia Moscibrodzki, M.P.H., and Craig L. Katz, M.D. The Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai Graduate Program in Public Health New York NY, United States Contact: [email protected] TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 3 Summary Statement Page 4 Focal Point Person in WHO Page 5 Name of Organizations Consulted Page 6 International Nonproprietary Name Page 7 Formulations Proposed for Inclusion Page 8 International Availability Page 10 Listing Requested Page 11 Public Health Relevance Page 13 Treatment Details Page 19 Comparative Effectiveness Page 29 Comparative Safety Page 41 Comparative Cost and Cost-Effectiveness Page 45 Regulatory Status Page 48 Pharmacoepial Standards Page 49 Text for the WHO Model Formulary Page 52 References Page 61 Appendix – Letters of Support 2 1. Summary Statement of the Proposal for Inclusion of Methylphenidate Methylphenidate (MPH), a central nervous system (CNS) stimulant, of the phenethylamine class, is proposed for inclusion in the WHO Model List of Essential Medications (EML) & the Model List of Essential Medications for Children (EMLc) for treatment of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) under ICD-11, 6C9Z mental, behavioral or neurodevelopmental disorder, disruptive behavior or dissocial disorders. To date, the list of essential medications does not include stimulants, which play a critical role in the treatment of psychotic disorders. Methylphenidate is proposed for inclusion on the complimentary list for both children and adults. This application provides a systematic review of the use, efficacy, safety, availability, and cost-effectiveness of methylphenidate compared with other stimulant (first-line) and non-stimulant (second-line) medications. -
Brain Networks Underlying Vulnerability and Resilience to Drug Addiction
Brain networks underlying vulnerability and resilience to drug addiction Karen D. Erschea,b,1,2, Chun Menga,b,1,2, Hisham Ziauddeena,c, Jan Stochla,d, Guy B. Williamse, Edward T. Bullmorea,b,c, and Trevor W. Robbinsb,f aDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0SZ, United Kingdom; bBehavioural and Clinical Neuroscience Institute, Department of Psychology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3EB, United Kingdom; cCambridgeshire and Peterborough National Health Service Foundation Trust, Cambridge CB21 5EF, United Kingdom; dDepartment of Kinanthropology and Humanities, Charles University, 16252 Prague, Czech Republic; eDepartment of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3EB, United Kingdom; and fDepartment of Psychology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3EB, United Kingdom Edited by Joseph E. LeDoux, New York University, New York, NY, and approved May 8, 2020 (received for review February 11, 2020) Regular drug use can lead to addiction, but not everyone who Much of the neuroscientific research on resilience has been ex- takes drugs makes this transition. How exactly drugs of abuse amined in adolescence (10), which is a period of heightened interact with individual vulnerability is not fully understood, nor is vulnerability and neural plasticity (11). While studies of adoles- it clear how individuals defy the risks associated with drugs or cents are important to inform the development and imple- addiction vulnerability. We used resting-state functional MRI mentation of preventative strategies, we also need to understand (fMRI) in 162 participants to characterize risk- and resilience- how resilience operates in vulnerable adults as the compensatory related changes in corticostriatal functional circuits in individuals mechanisms that have been characterized in adolescents do not exposed to stimulant drugs both with and without clinically di- necessarily translate into adulthood. -
ALEX COLOMÉ (48) COLOMÉ ALEX Tommy Romero (Rhp), May 25, 2018
ALEX COLOMÉ (48) POSITION: Right-Handed Pitcher AGE: 29 BORN: 12-31-88 in Santo Domingo, DR BATS: Right THROWS: Right HEIGHT: 6-1 WEIGHT: 220 ML SERVICE: 3 years, 118 days CONTRACT STATUS: Signed through 2018 ACQUIRED: In trade with Tampa Bay along with Denard Span (of) 2018 MARINERS and cash considerations in exchange for Andrew Moore (rhp) and Tommy Romero (rhp), May 25, 2018. PRONUNCIATION: Colomé (COLE-uh-may) 2017: • The Totals – Went 2-3 with 47 saves COLOMÉ’s CAREER HIGHS and a 3.24 ERA (24 ER, 66.2 IP) with MOST STRIKEOUTS: 58 strikeouts and 23 walks in 65 relief STARTER: 7 – 5/30/13 at MIA w/TB appearances with Tampa Bay. RELIEVER: 4 — 7/26/15 vs. BAL w/TB • Leader – Became the first pitcher LOW-HIT GAME: None in club history to lead the Major LONGEST WINNING STREAK: Leagues in saves…his 47 saves were 4 – 6/27/14 – 5/6/15 w/TB one shy of the club record, set by LONGEST LOSING STREAK: Fernando Rodney in 2012 (48)…his 4 – 4/15 – 8/26/16 w/TB 47 saves were 6 more than any other pitcher in the Majors (Greg Holland- MOST INNINGS: COL and Kenley Jansen-LAD) and 8 STARTER: 7.0 – 2 times, more than any other pitcher in the AL last: 7/1/15 vs. CLE w/TB (Roberto Osuna-TOR). RELIEVER: 4.0 – 5/26/14 at TOR w/TB • Length – Led the American League with 6 saves of 4 outs or more. • Award Season – Named American League Reliever of the Month for August…was 10- for-10 in save opportunities while posting a 0.75 ERA (1 ER, 12.0 IP) with 13 strikeouts and 1 walk in 12 games. -
Supplement of Hydrol
Supplement of Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 25, 957–982, 2021 https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-25-957-2021-supplement © Author(s) 2021. This work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Supplement of Learning from satellite observations: increased understanding of catchment processes through stepwise model improvement Petra Hulsman et al. Correspondence to: Petra Hulsman ([email protected]) The copyright of individual parts of the supplement might differ from the CC BY 4.0 License. Supplements S1. Model performance with respect to all discharge signatures ............................................... 2 S2. Parameter sets selected based on discharge ......................................................................... 3 S2.1 Time series: Discharge ............................................................................................................................... 3 S2.2. Time series: Evaporation (Basin average) ................................................................................................. 4 S2.3 Time series: Evaporation (Wetland dominated areas) ................................................................................ 5 S2.4 Time series: Total water storage (Basin average) ....................................................................................... 6 S2.5. Spatial pattern: Evaporation (normalised, dry season) .............................................................................. 7 S2.6. Spatial pattern: Total water storage (normalised, dry season) .................................................................. -
Substance Abuse and Dependence
9 Substance Abuse and Dependence CHAPTER CHAPTER OUTLINE CLASSIFICATION OF SUBSTANCE-RELATED THEORETICAL PERSPECTIVES 310–316 Residential Approaches DISORDERS 291–296 Biological Perspectives Psychodynamic Approaches Substance Abuse and Dependence Learning Perspectives Behavioral Approaches Addiction and Other Forms of Compulsive Cognitive Perspectives Relapse-Prevention Training Behavior Psychodynamic Perspectives SUMMING UP 325–326 Racial and Ethnic Differences in Substance Sociocultural Perspectives Use Disorders TREATMENT OF SUBSTANCE ABUSE Pathways to Drug Dependence AND DEPENDENCE 316–325 DRUGS OF ABUSE 296–310 Biological Approaches Depressants Culturally Sensitive Treatment Stimulants of Alcoholism Hallucinogens Nonprofessional Support Groups TRUTH or FICTION T❑ F❑ Heroin accounts for more deaths “Nothing and Nobody Comes Before than any other drug. (p. 291) T❑ F❑ You cannot be psychologically My Coke” dependent on a drug without also being She had just caught me with cocaine again after I had managed to convince her that physically dependent on it. (p. 295) I hadn’t used in over a month. Of course I had been tooting (snorting) almost every T❑ F❑ More teenagers and young adults die day, but I had managed to cover my tracks a little better than usual. So she said to from alcohol-related motor vehicle accidents me that I was going to have to make a choice—either cocaine or her. Before she than from any other cause. (p. 297) finished the sentence, I knew what was coming, so I told her to think carefully about what she was going to say. It was clear to me that there wasn’t a choice. I love my T❑ F❑ It is safe to let someone who has wife, but I’m not going to choose anything over cocaine. -
Comparison of the Inhibitory and Excitatory Effects of ADHD Medications Methylphenidate and Atomoxetine on Motor Cortex
Neuropsychopharmacology (2006) 31, 442–449 & 2006 Nature Publishing Group All rights reserved 0893-133X/06 $30.00 www.neuropsychopharmacology.org Comparison of the Inhibitory and Excitatory Effects of ADHD Medications Methylphenidate and Atomoxetine on Motor Cortex ,1 2 3 1 1 4 Donald L Gilbert* , Keith R Ridel , Floyd R Sallee , Jie Zhang , Tara D Lipps and Eric M Wassermann 1 2 Division of Neurology, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA; University of Cincinnati 3 4 School of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA; Division of Psychiatry, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA; Brain Stimulation Unit, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, Bethesda, MD, USA Stimulant and norepinephrine (NE) reuptake inhibitor medications have different effects at the neuronal level, but both reduce symptoms of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). To understand their common physiologic effects and thereby gain insight into the neurobiology of ADHD treatment, we compared the effects of the stimulant methylphenidate (MPH) and NE uptake inhibitor atomoxetine (ATX) on inhibitory and excitatory processes in human cortex. Nine healthy, right-handed adults were given a single, oral dose of 30 mg MPH and 60 mg ATX at visits separated by 1 week in a randomized, double-blind crossover trial. We used paired and single transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) of motor cortex to measure conditioned and unconditioned motor-evoked potential amplitudes at inhibitory (3 ms) and facilitatory (10 ms) interstimulus intervals (ISI) before and after drug administration. Data were analyzed with repeated measures, mixed model regression. We also analyzed our findings and the published literature with meta-analysis software to estimate treatment effects of stimulants and NE reuptake inhibitors on these TMS measures. -
Methylphenidate Amplifies the Potency and Reinforcing Effects Of
ARTICLE Received 1 Aug 2013 | Accepted 7 Oct 2013 | Published 5 Nov 2013 DOI: 10.1038/ncomms3720 Methylphenidate amplifies the potency and reinforcing effects of amphetamines by increasing dopamine transporter expression Erin S. Calipari1, Mark J. Ferris1, Ali Salahpour2, Marc G. Caron3 & Sara R. Jones1 Methylphenidate (MPH) is commonly diverted for recreational use, but the neurobiological consequences of exposure to MPH at high, abused doses are not well defined. Here we show that MPH self-administration in rats increases dopamine transporter (DAT) levels and enhances the potency of MPH and amphetamine on dopamine responses and drug-seeking behaviours, without altering cocaine effects. Genetic overexpression of the DAT in mice mimics these effects, confirming that MPH self-administration-induced increases in DAT levels are sufficient to induce the changes. Further, this work outlines a basic mechanism by which increases in DAT levels, regardless of how they occur, are capable of increasing the rewarding and reinforcing effects of select psychostimulant drugs, and suggests that indivi- duals with elevated DAT levels, such as ADHD sufferers, may be more susceptible to the addictive effects of amphetamine-like drugs. 1 Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27157, USA. 2 Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5S1A8. 3 Department of Cell Biology, Medicine and Neurobiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 27710, USA. Correspondence and requests for materials should be addressed to S.R.J. (email: [email protected]). NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | 4:2720 | DOI: 10.1038/ncomms3720 | www.nature.com/naturecommunications 1 & 2013 Macmillan Publishers Limited. -
Interactions Between Ethanol and Cocaine, Amphetamine, Or MDMA in the Rat: Thermoregulatory and Locomotor Effects
Psychopharmacology DOI 10.1007/s00213-007-1007-5 ORIGINAL INVESTIGATION Interactions between ethanol and cocaine, amphetamine, or MDMA in the rat: thermoregulatory and locomotor effects Sami Ben Hamida & Erin Plute & Brigitte Cosquer & Christian Kelche & Byron C. Jones & Jean-Christophe Cassel Received: 22 May 2007 /Accepted: 29 October 2007 # Springer-Verlag 2007 Abstract duced by EtOH alone. Conversely, EtOH attenuated Rationale (±)-3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine MDMA-related hyperthermia, an effect increasing across (MDMA, ecstasy) is often taken recreationally with ethanol treatment days. These results demonstrate that the interac- (EtOH). In rats, EtOH may potentiate MDMA-induced tion between MDMA and EtOH may be different from the hyperactivity, but attenuate hyperthermia. interaction between EtOH and AMPH or COCA. Objective Experiment 1 compared the interactions between Conclusion Because of potential health-related consequen- EtOH (1.5 g/kg) and MDMA (6.6 mg/kg) with EtOH + ces of such polydrug misuse, it is worth identifying the cocaine (COCA; 10 mg/kg) and EtOH + amphetamine mechanisms underlying these interactions, especially be- (AMPH; 1 mg/kg) on locomotor activity and thermoregu- tween EtOH and MDMA. Given the different affinity lation. Experiment 2 used a weaker dose of MDMA profiles of the three drugs for serotonin, dopamine, and (3.3 mg/kg) and larger doses of COCA (20 mg/kg) and norepinephrine transporters, our results appear compatible AMPH (2 mg/kg). with the possibility of an important role of serotonin in at Materials and methods Drug treatments were administered least the EtOH-induced potentiation of MDMA-induced on four occasions (2, 5, and 2 days apart, respectively; hyperlocomotion. -
A User's Guide to Methamphetamine
A USER’S GUIDE TO METHAMPHETAMINE A self-help guide to reduce harm for people who use methamphetamine 1st Edition, March 2017 Acknowledgements This booklet was adapted from an original publication created by The National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia. This information does not constitute medical advice. Please seek the immediate help of a qualified medical practitioner about any personal health concerns. This booklet is being distributed for information purposes only. In the current state of crisis related to crystal methamphetamine, this booklet is intended as a guide to reduce harm for people who use methamphetamine. It lists the most common features of methamphetamine use, ways to reduce harm associated with the use of meth, and strategies for cutting down and quitting. The best way to avoid problems with drugs is to not use them. We are grateful for the contributions of the Integrated Drug Strategies in Waterloo Region and Guelph Wellington, in particular the leadership of Adrienne Crowder and Lindsay Sprague. Don Roth, Kerry Manthenga, Shirley Hilton, and our community review team provided great support and helpful edits. Marcey Gray provided exemplary skill on the design, images and editing, with final expert assistance from Arkay Design and Print. We are thankful for the financial support to print copies from the Waterloo-Wellington Human Services and Justice Coordinating Committee. For more information please contact: Wellington Guelph Drug Strategy www.wgdrugstrategy.ca Waterloo Region Integrated Drugs Strategy www.waterlooregiondrugstrategy.ca Circulated with the support of: WaterlooRegion Integrated Drugs Strategy WaterlooRegion Integrated Drugs Strategy The best way to avoid problems with drugs is to not use them. -
The ICD-10 Classification of Mental and Behavioural Disorders: Clinical Descriptions and Diagnostic Guidelines
The ICD-10 Classification of Mental and Behavioural Disorders: Clinical descriptions and diagnostic guidelines World Health Organization F10 - F19 Mental and behavioural disorders due to psychoactive substance use Overview of this block F10. – Mental and behavioural disorders due to use of alcohol F11. – Mental and behavioural disorders due to use of opioids F12. – Mental and behavioural disorders due to use of cannabinoids F13. – Mental and behavioural disorders due to use of sedative hypnotics F14. – Mental and behavioural disorders due to use of cocaine F15. – Mental and behavioural disorders due to use of other stimulants, including caffeine F16. – Mental and behavioural disorders due to use of hallucinogens F17. – Mental and behavioural disorders due to use of tobacco F18. – Mental and behavioural disorders due to use of volatile solvents F19. – Mental and behavioural disorders due to multiple drug use and use of other psychoactive substances Four- and five-character codes may be used to specify the clinical conditions, as follows: F1x.0 Acute intoxication .00 Uncomplicated .01 With trauma or other bodily injury .02 With other medical complications .03 With delirium .04 With perceptual distortions .05 With coma .06 With convulsions .07 Pathological intoxication F1x.1 Harmful use F1x.2 Dependence syndrome .20 Currently abstinent .21 Currently abstinent, but in a protected environment .22 Currently on a clinically supervised maintenance or replacement regime [controlled dependence] .23 Currently abstinent, but receiving treatment with -
Reinforcement-Based Cognitive Biases As Vulnerability Factors
Reinforcement-based cognitive biases as vulnerability factors in alcohol addiction: From humans to animal models Karolina Noworyta1, Agata Cieslik1, and Rafal Rygula1 1Maj Institute of Pharmacology Polish Academy of Sciences March 15, 2021 Abstract Alcohol use disorder (AUD) is one of the most common but still poorly treated psychiatric conditions. Developing new treatments requires a better understanding of the aetiology of symptoms and evaluation of novel therapeutic targets in preclinical studies. Recent developments in our understanding of the reinforcement-based cognitive biases (RBCBs) that contribute to the development of AUD and its treatment offer new opportunities for both clinical and preclinical research. In this review, we first briefly describe psychological and cognitive theories that implicate various aspects of reinforcement sensitivity in the development, maintenance, and recurrence of alcohol addiction. Furthermore, in separate sections, we describe studies investigating RBCBs and their neural, neurochemical, and pharmacological correlates, and we discuss possible interactions between RBCBs and trajectories of AUD. Finally, we describe how recent translational studies using state-of-the-art animal models can facilitate our understanding of the role of reinforcement sensitivity and RBCBs in various aspects of AUD. Introduction Alcohol addiction is one of the biggest problems of modern society through its impact on health, social cohesion, crime, and its comorbidity with other neuropsychiatric disorders. Major advances in genetics and molecular neurobiology have led to the identification of many of the primary targets of alcohol and revealed neuroadaptations that develop with its chronic consumption. However, understanding pre-existing cognitive deficits that serve as substrates compounding the initiation of alcohol use and the development of alcohol use disorder (AUD) remains a major challenge. -
Lidocaine Infusion for Analgesia MOA Pharmacology 1
Lidocaine Infusion for Analgesia MOA Pharmacology 1. Attenuation of proinflammatory effects: Ø Hepatic metabolism with high extraction ratio; Ø Blocks polymorphonuclear granulocyte priming, plasma clearance is 10 ml/kg/min13 reducing release of cytokines & reactive oxygen species1 Ø Adjust dose based on hepatic function and 2. Diminish nociceptive signaling to central nervous system: blood flow Ø Inhibition of G-protein-mediated effects2 Ø Renal clearance of metabolites Ø Reduces sensitivity & activity of spinal cord neurons Ø Context-sensitive half-time after a 3-day infusion is (glycine and NMDA receptor mediated)3,4 ∼20–40 min Ø Clinical effect of lidocaine tends to exceed the 5 3. Reduces ectopic activity of injured afferent nerves duration of the infusion by 5.5 times the half-life, supporting the putative preventive analgesia effect14 Perioperative Use Dosing Ø IV local anesthetic infusions have been used safely for pain control in the perioperative setting since the early 1950’s6,7 Infusion: 2mg/kg/hr (range 1.5-3 mg/kg/hr) Ø Reduce pain, nausea, ileus duration, opioid requirement, Loading dose: 1.5mg/kg (range 1-2 mg/kg) and length of hospital stay Ø Strongly consider bolus to rapidly achieve therapeutic concentration, otherwise steady state 9-12 Evidence for Specific Surgeries: reached in 4-8 hr Ø Strong: Open & laparoscopic abdominal; Reduces Max dose: 4.5 mg/kg postoperative pain, speeds return of bowel function, Ø Consider total dose from other local anesthetics reduces PONV, reduces length of hospital stay (e.g. regional anesthesia, periarticular injections, & Ø Moderate: Open prostatectomy, thoracic procedures, local infiltration) ambulatory surgery, and major spine; Reduces Continuous infusions up to 3 mg/kg/hr have been postoperative pain and opioid consumption shown to be safe Ø Moderate: Breast; Prevention of chronic postsurgical pain Ø Reduce infusion rate in patients with impaired Ø No benefit: Total abdominal hysterectomy, total hip drug metabolism & clearance (i.e.