DOCSLIB.ORG

Danish in Wikidata Lexemes

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Danish in Wikidata Lexemes Danish in Wikidata lexemes Finn Arup˚ Nielsen Cognitive Systems, DTU Compute, Technical University of Denmark Kongens Lyngby, Denmark Abstract 2 Wikidata lexemes Wikidata introduced support for lexico- Wikidata stores lexeme data on a new type of pages graphic data in 2018. Here we describe the prefixed with the letter `L' and further identified lexicographic part of Wikidata as well as with an integer, e.g., the Danish lexeme gentagelse experiences with setting up lexemes for the (repetition) has the identifier \L117" and available Danish language. We note various possible for view and edit at https://www.wikidata.org/ annotations for lexemes as well as discuss wiki/Lexeme:L117. On the same page, multiple various choices made. senses and forms for the lexeme may be defined. 1 Introduction They are identified by suffixes to the lexeme iden- tifier, e.g., the plural indefinite form gentagelser Wikipedia's structured sister Wikidata (Vrandeˇci´c would be identified as \L117-F3", while the first and Kr¨otzsch, 2014) at https://www.wikidata. sense|if it was defined|would have been identi- org/ supports interlinking different language ver- fied as \L117-S1". Forms and senses are defined sions of Wikipedia as well as several other Wikime- separately, so it is currently difficult to define a dia sites, such as Wikibooks and Wikimedia Com- specific sense for a specific form. Lexemes, forms mons. One wiki that has been missing from the list and senses may be associated with properties, and is Wiktionary, | the dictionary wiki. Wiktionary these properties are identified with integer prefixed has a structure different from the other wikis as with the letter `P'. multiple different words and concepts might be de- The Wikidata lexeme data maps to an RDF scribed on the same page, only connected through representation,2 and the RDF data is queryable the same orthographic representation. via the Wikidata Query Service SPARQL end- In 2018, Wikidata enabled support for lexico- point at https://query.wikidata.org/. The graphic data via special lexeme wiki pages. Com- mapping uses part of the Lexicon Model for On- pared to Wiktionary, Wikidata lexemes offer a so- tologies (LEMON) ontology (Cimiano et al., 2016; lution with directly machine-readable data: it is McCrae et al., 2012). The central OWL con- not necessary to write parsers to obtain the lex- cepts for the lexeme data are ontolex:LexicalEntry, eme data in a structured format. Wikidata lex- ontolex:Form and ontolex:LexicalSense for lex- emes also reduce the amount of redundant in- eme, form and sense respectively with the prefix put: In Wiktionary, each language edition sets http://www.w3.org/ns/lemon/ontolex#. Each up its own dictionary, and a word described in of these three OWL concepts has associated ba- one Wiktionary is not directly available in another sic data in Wikidata. Apart from the identifier, Wiktionary. Further issues with Wiktionary are the lexeme has the lemma, language and lexical the linkage to the Wikidata concept ontology and category, the form has its orthographic representa- the linkage to external resources such as WordNet tion and grammatical features while the sense may (Miller, 1995). Neither of these links is non-trivial have multiple glosses. This basic data cannot be to set up, though matching lexical entries between associated with qualifiers and references like nor- Wiktionary and WordNet may be done with good mal Wikidata properties. accuracy (McCrae et al., 2012). Links from Wikidata lexemes (L-pages) to Q- Below we will describe how lexemes are sup- items (i.e., the ordinary Wikidata items) are of two 1 ported on Wikidata, and list some of the Danish kinds: Either for the description of the lexical and resources relevant for Wikidata lexemes. Then we grammatical \metadata" for the lexeme or for the will detail how Danish lexemes have been anno- description of the meaning of a sense. In the latter tated and discuss some of the choices made. case, the Q-items function as the wordnet notion 1There is an introduction to Wikidata lexemes on Wikidata itself at https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/ 2https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension: Wikidata_talk:Lexicographical_data. WikibaseLexeme/RDF_mapping Danish Total Description SPARQL query fragment 1268 43816 Number of lexemes [] a ontolex:LexicalEntry 4826 118742 Number of forms [] a ontolex:Form 617 11194 Number of sense [] a ontolex:LexicalSense 8594 218803 Number of grammatical feature links [] wikibase:grammaticalFeature [] Table 1: Statistics for lexeme data in Wikidata. See also the statistics displayed on the Ordia website at https://tools.wmflabs.org/ordia/statistics/. of synsets. Wikidata has specific properties to link the Danish part of the Europarl corpus (Koehn, Q-items to synsets in external lexical resources, 2005). Fairy tales by Hans Christian Andersen can including BabelNet (Navigli and Ponzetto, 2010) be found with modern spelling. (P2581) and the Collaborative Interlingual Index Of the lexicographical resources, the standard (P5063)(Bond et al., 2016). Alternatively, the Danish dictionary, Retskrivningsordbogen, has a re- more generic property for Linked Open data URIs strictive license. Another large Danish dictionary (P2888) can be used. Wikidata has linked some with over 300'000 entries and used, e.g., with the WordNet synsets used in ImageNet. The corre- computer program aspell, is under the GNU Gen- spondence between the resources is not necessarily eral Public License and is not compatible with straightforward to establish (Nielsen, 2018). Wikidata's CC0. DanNet (Pedersen et al., 2009) Some statistics for the lexeme data in Wikidata has a WordNet-derived open license and a Wiki- are displayed in Table1. It displays, e.g., that the data property (P6140) for the DanNet words | number of forms is close to 120'000. In compari- corresponding to Wikidata lexemes|has been cre- son, the English Wiktionary has currently around ated in November 2018. DanNet is distributed as 5.9 million content pages, while the Danish Wik- OWL, so should fit well with Wikidata lexemes. tionary has around 38 thousand.3 The numbers NST Lexical database for Danish4 has Speech are not directly comparable as multiple forms may Assessment Methods Phonetic Alphabet (SAMPA) be listed on one Wiktionary content page. A count pronunciation specification for over 235'000 Danish on the distinct number of (monolingual) form rep- words and stated to have the CC0 license. resentations in Wikidata gives 89'728 on 27 March As of June 2019, we have used 160 sentences 2019 based on the following SPARQL query: from the Danish part of the Europarl corpus,5 and 6 SELECT linked to 1258 DanNet 2.2 word identifiers, while (COUNT(DISTINCT(?representation)) the NST phonetic data has hardly been used. AS ? count ) { [] ontolex:representation 4 Annotating lexemes, forms and ?representation . } senses 3 Danish resources Wikidata has a continuously growing number of properties that can be used to annotate lexemes, There are some Danish resources relevant for Wiki- forms and senses. General properties|that are rel- data lexemes, e.g., corpora for language usage ex- evant for lexemes of most word classes|are usage amples. As Wikidata is distributed under the Cre- example (P5831), word stem (P5187) and derived ative Commons Zero (CC0) license, the resources from (P5191), where the latter may indicate et- incorporated into Wikidata need to be compatible ymological origin or origin of derivations. Com- with that license. pound parts may be linked with a property (P5238) Old out-of-copyright Danish works are typically and the order of the parts may be specified with a with an antiquated spelling, e.g., where the first property used as a qualifier (P1545). The Wikidata letter of nouns has a capital letter. Wikipedia and property for DanNet words (P6140) are linked to Wiktionary may not be used because their content version 2.2 of the resource. As of March 2019, 844 is under an attribution and share-alike license, not lexemes with associated information about DanNet compatible with the CC0 license. Modern Dan- words are linked.7 The data model of Wikidata al- ish sentences can be retrieved from, e.g., Danish 4 https://www.nb.no/sprakbanken/show?serial= law texts at https://www.retsinformation.dk/, sbr-26 Danish translations of international treaties and 5See Ordia's statistics at https://tools.wmflabs. conventions, such as the Treaty of Lisbon, and org/ordia/reference/Q5412081 6The SPARQL query SELECT ?dannet f ?lexeme 3 https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/Special: wdt:P6140 ?dannet g on the Wikidata Query Service. Statistics and https://da.wiktionary.org/wiki/ 7https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Property_ Speciel:Statistik talk:P6140 displays the DanNet property statistics. lows for the specification of \no value", thus it is 4.3 Images and audio possible to specify that a lexeme cannot be found Senses may be associated with images by referenc- in the DanNet 2.2 resource. For instance, adverbs ing filenames in the free media archive Wikimedia and rare nouns, such as lommevogn (L40687), are Commons. The link may help language learners not in DanNet and indicated as such. The usage and possibly be a resource for training natural lan- example property (P5831) can store a short free- guage processing machine learning models in the form text and the qualifier stated in (P248) can same way that ImageNet has used WordNet, see point to a Q-item with metadata about a work (Nielsen, 2018; Nielsen and Hansen, 2018) for ap- where the text appears. A related property is at- plications of the use of Wikidata. Typically the tested in (P5323) which also can point to a Q-item. senses of nouns may be associated with images, Lexemes may also be associated with classes via while it may be difficult to identify good images the instance of property (P31).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Dictionary Users Do Look up Frequent Words. a Logfile Analysis
    Erschienen in: Müller-Spitzer, Carolin (Hrsg.): Using Online Dictionaries. Berlin/ Boston: de Gruyter, 2014. (Lexicographica: Series Maior 145), S. 229-249. Alexander Koplenig, Peter Meyer, Carolin Müller-Spitzer Dictionary users do look up frequent words. A logfile analysis Abstract: In this paper, we use the 2012 log files of two German online dictionaries (Digital Dictionary of the German Language1 and the German Version of Wiktionary) and the 100,000 most frequent words in the Mannheim German Reference Corpus from 2009 to answer the question of whether dictionary users really do look up fre- quent words, first asked by de Schryver et al. (2006). By using an approach to the comparison of log files and corpus data which is completely different from that of the aforementioned authors, we provide empirical evidence that indicates - contra - ry to the results of de Schryver et al. and Verlinde/Binon (2010) - that the corpus frequency of a word can indeed be an important factor in determining what online dictionary users look up. Finally, we incorporate word dass Information readily available in Wiktionary into our analysis to improve our results considerably. Keywords: log file, frequency, corpus, headword list, monolingual dictionary, multi- lingual dictionary Alexander Koplenig: Institut für Deutsche Sprache, R 5, 6-13, 68161 Mannheim, +49-(0)621-1581- 435, [email protected] Peter Meyer: Institut für Deutsche Sprache, R 5, 6-13, 68161 Mannheim, +49-(0)621-1581-427, [email protected] Carolin Müller-Spitzer: Institut für Deutsche Sprache, R 5, 6-13, 68161 Mannheim, +49-(0)621-1581- 429, [email protected] Introduction We would like to Start this chapter by asking one of the most fundamental questions for any general lexicographical endeavour to describe the words of one (or more) language(s): which words should be included in a dictionary? At first glance, the answer seems rather simple (especially when the primary objective is to describe a language as completely as possible): it would be best to include every word in the dictionary.
    [Show full text]
  • Etytree: a Graphical and Interactive Etymology Dictionary Based on Wiktionary
    Etytree: A Graphical and Interactive Etymology Dictionary Based on Wiktionary Ester Pantaleo Vito Walter Anelli Wikimedia Foundation grantee Politecnico di Bari Italy Italy [email protected] [email protected] Tommaso Di Noia Gilles Sérasset Politecnico di Bari Univ. Grenoble Alpes, CNRS Italy Grenoble INP, LIG, F-38000 Grenoble, France [email protected] [email protected] ABSTRACT a new method1 that parses Etymology, Derived terms, De- We present etytree (from etymology + family tree): a scendants sections, the namespace for Reconstructed Terms, new on-line multilingual tool to extract and visualize et- and the etymtree template in Wiktionary. ymological relationships between words from the English With etytree, a RDF (Resource Description Framework) Wiktionary. A first version of etytree is available at http: lexical database of etymological relationships collecting all //tools.wmflabs.org/etytree/. the extracted relationships and lexical data attached to lex- With etytree users can search a word and interactively emes has also been released. The database consists of triples explore etymologically related words (ancestors, descendants, or data entities composed of subject-predicate-object where cognates) in many languages using a graphical interface. a possible statement can be (for example) a triple with a lex- The data is synchronised with the English Wiktionary dump eme as subject, a lexeme as object, and\derivesFrom"or\et- at every new release, and can be queried via SPARQL from a ymologicallyEquivalentTo" as predicate. The RDF database Virtuoso endpoint. has been exposed via a SPARQL endpoint and can be queried Etytree is the first graphical etymology dictionary, which at http://etytree-virtuoso.wmflabs.org/sparql.
    [Show full text]
  • User Contributions to Online Dictionaries Andrea Abel and Christian M
    The dynamics outside the paper: User Contributions to Online Dictionaries Andrea Abel and Christian M. Meyer Electronic lexicography in the 21st century (eLex): Thinking outside the paper, Tallinn, Estonia, October 17–19, 2013. 18.10.2013 | European Academy of Bozen/Bolzano and Technische Universität Darmstadt | Andrea Abel and Christian M. Meyer | 1 Introduction Online dictionaries rely increasingly on their users and leverage methods for facilitating user contributions at basically any step of the lexicographic process. 18.10.2013 | European Academy of Bozen/Bolzano and Technische Universität Darmstadt | Andrea Abel and Christian M. Meyer | 2 Previous work . Mostly focused on specific type/dimension of user contribution . e.g., Carr (1997), Storrer (1998, 2010), Køhler Simonsen (2005), Fuertes-Olivera (2009), Melchior (2012), Lew (2011, 2013) . Ambiguous, partly overlapping terms: www.wordle.net/show/wrdl/7124863/User_contributions (02.10.2013) www.wordle.net/show/wrdl/7124863/User_contributions http:// 18.10.2013 | European Academy of Bozen/Bolzano and Technische Universität Darmstadt | Andrea Abel and Christian M. Meyer | 3 Research goals and contribution How to effectively plan the user contributions for new and established dictionaries? . Comprehensive and systematic classification is still missing . Mann (2010): analysis of 88 online dictionaries . User contributions roughly categorized as direct / indirect contributions and exchange with other dictionary users . Little detail given, since outside the scope of the analysis . We use this as a basis for our work We propose a novel classification of the different types of user contributions based on many practical examples 18.10.2013 | European Academy of Bozen/Bolzano and Technische Universität Darmstadt | Andrea Abel and Christian M.
    [Show full text]
  • Knowit VQA: Answering Knowledge-Based Questions About Videos
    The Thirty-Fourth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-20) KnowIT VQA: Answering Knowledge-Based Questions about Videos Noa Garcia,1 Mayu Otani,2 Chenhui Chu,1 Yuta Nakashima1 1Osaka University, Japan, 2CyberAgent, Inc., Japan {noagarcia, chu, n-yuta}@ids.osaka-u.ac.jp otani [email protected] Abstract We propose a novel video understanding task by fusing knowledge-based and video question answering. First, we in- troduce KnowIT VQA, a video dataset with 24,282 human- generated question-answer pairs about a popular sitcom. The dataset combines visual, textual and temporal coherence rea- /HRQDUG+DYH\RXQRWLFHGWKDW+RZDUGFDQWDNHDQ\WRSLFDQGXVHLWWRUHPLQG soning together with knowledge-based questions, which need \RXWKDWKHZHQWWRVSDFH" of the experience obtained from the viewing of the series to be 6KHOGRQ,QWHUHVWLQJK\SRWKHVLV/HW¶VDSSO\WKHVFLHQWLILFPHWKRG answered. Second, we propose a video understanding model /HRQDUG2ND\+H\+RZDUGDQ\WKRXJKWVRQZKHUHZHVKRXOGJHWGLQQHU" by combining the visual and textual video content with spe- +RZDUG$Q\ZKHUHEXWWKH6SDFH6WDWLRQ2QDJRRGGD\GLQQHUZDVDEDJIXOO cific knowledge about the show. Our main findings are: (i) the RIPHDWORDI%XWKH\\RXGRQ¶WJRWKHUHIRUWKHIRRG\RXJRWKHUHIRUWKHYLHZ incorporation of knowledge produces outstanding improve- ments for VQA in video, and (ii) the performance on KnowIT 9LVXDO +RZPDQ\SHRSOHDUHWKHUHZHDULQJJODVVHV"2QH VQA still lags well behind human accuracy, indicating its 7H[WXDO :KRKDVEHHQWRWKHV:KRKDVEHHQWRWKHVSDFH"SDFH" +R+RZDUGZDUG usefulness for studying current video modelling limitations. 7HPSRUDO +RZGRWKH\+RZGRWKH\ILQLVKWKHFRQYHUVDWLRQ" ILQLVKWKHFRQYHUVDWLRQ"66KDNLQJKDQGVKDNLQJKDQGV Introduction .QRZOHGJH :KRRZQVWKHSODFHZKHUHWKH:KRRZQVWKHSODFHZKHUHWKH\DUHVWDQGLQJ"\DUHVWDQGLQJ"66WXDUWWXDUW Visual question answering (VQA) was firstly introduced in (Malinowski and Fritz 2014) as a task for bringing to- Figure 1: Types of questions addressed in KnowIt VQA. gether advancements in natural language processing and image understanding.
    [Show full text]
  • Wiktionary Matcher
    Wiktionary Matcher Jan Portisch1;2[0000−0001−5420−0663], Michael Hladik2[0000−0002−2204−3138], and Heiko Paulheim1[0000−0003−4386−8195] 1 Data and Web Science Group, University of Mannheim, Germany fjan, [email protected] 2 SAP SE Product Engineering Financial Services, Walldorf, Germany fjan.portisch, [email protected] Abstract. In this paper, we introduce Wiktionary Matcher, an ontology matching tool that exploits Wiktionary as external background knowl- edge source. Wiktionary is a large lexical knowledge resource that is collaboratively built online. Multiple current language versions of Wik- tionary are merged and used for monolingual ontology matching by ex- ploiting synonymy relations and for multilingual matching by exploiting the translations given in the resource. We show that Wiktionary can be used as external background knowledge source for the task of ontology matching with reasonable matching and runtime performance.3 Keywords: Ontology Matching · Ontology Alignment · External Re- sources · Background Knowledge · Wiktionary 1 Presentation of the System 1.1 State, Purpose, General Statement The Wiktionary Matcher is an element-level, label-based matcher which uses an online lexical resource, namely Wiktionary. The latter is "[a] collaborative project run by the Wikimedia Foundation to produce a free and complete dic- tionary in every language"4. The dictionary is organized similarly to Wikipedia: Everybody can contribute to the project and the content is reviewed in a com- munity process. Compared to WordNet [4], Wiktionary is significantly larger and also available in other languages than English. This matcher uses DBnary [15], an RDF version of Wiktionary that is publicly available5. The DBnary data set makes use of an extended LEMON model [11] to describe the data.
    [Show full text]
  • Extracting an Etymological Database from Wiktionary Benoît Sagot
    Extracting an Etymological Database from Wiktionary Benoît Sagot To cite this version: Benoît Sagot. Extracting an Etymological Database from Wiktionary. Electronic Lexicography in the 21st century (eLex 2017), Sep 2017, Leiden, Netherlands. pp.716-728. hal-01592061 HAL Id: hal-01592061 https://hal.inria.fr/hal-01592061 Submitted on 22 Sep 2017 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Extracting an Etymological Database from Wiktionary Benoît Sagot Inria 2 rue Simone Iff, 75012 Paris, France E-mail: [email protected] Abstract Electronic lexical resources almost never contain etymological information. The availability of such information, if properly formalised, could open up the possibility of developing automatic tools targeted towards historical and comparative linguistics, as well as significantly improving the automatic processing of ancient languages. We describe here the process we implemented for extracting etymological data from the etymological notices found in Wiktionary. We have produced a multilingual database of nearly one million lexemes and a database of more than half a million etymological relations between lexemes. Keywords: Lexical resource development; etymology; Wiktionary 1. Introduction Electronic lexical resources used in the fields of natural language processing and com- putational linguistics are almost exclusively synchronic resources; they mostly include information about inflectional, derivational, syntactic, semantic or even pragmatic prop- erties of their entries.
    [Show full text]
  • Wiktionary Matcher Results for OAEI 2020
    Wiktionary Matcher Results for OAEI 2020 Jan Portisch1;2[0000−0001−5420−0663] and Heiko Paulheim1[0000−0003−4386−8195] 1 Data and Web Science Group, University of Mannheim, Germany fjan, [email protected] 2 SAP SE Product Engineering Financial Services, Walldorf, Germany [email protected] Abstract. This paper presents the results of the Wiktionary Matcher in the Ontology Alignment Evaluation Initiative (OAEI) 2020. Wiktionary Matcher is an ontology matching tool that exploits Wiktionary as exter- nal background knowledge source. Wiktionary is a large lexical knowl- edge resource that is collaboratively built online. Multiple current lan- guage versions of Wiktionary are merged and used for monolingual on- tology matching by exploiting synonymy relations and for multilingual matching by exploiting the translations given in the resource. This is the second OAEI participation of the matching system. Wiktionary Matcher has been improved and is the best performing system on the knowledge graph track this year.3 Keywords: Ontology Matching · Ontology Alignment · External Re- sources · Background Knowledge · Wiktionary 1 Presentation of the System 1.1 State, Purpose, General Statement The Wiktionary Matcher is an element-level, label-based matcher which uses an online lexical resource, namely Wiktionary. The latter is "[a] collaborative project run by the Wikimedia Foundation to produce a free and complete dic- tionary in every language"4. The dictionary is organized similarly to Wikipedia: Everybody can contribute to the project and the content is reviewed in a com- munity process. Compared to WordNet [2], Wiktionary is significantly larger and also available in other languages than English. This matcher uses DBnary [13], an RDF version of Wiktionary that is publicly available5.
    [Show full text]
  • S Wiktionary Wikisource Wikibooks Wikiquote Wikimedia Commons
    SCHWESTERPROJEKTE Wiktionary S Das Wiktionary ist der lexikalische Partner der freien Enzyklopädie Wikipedia: ein Projekt zur Erstellung freier Wörterbücher und Thesau- ri. Während die Wikipedia inhaltliche Konzepte beschreibt, geht es in ihrem ältesten Schwester- projekt, dem 2002 gegründeten Wiktionary um Wörter, ihre Grammatik und Etymologie, Homo- nyme und Synonyme und Übersetzungen. Wikisource Wikisource ist eine Sammlung von Texten, die entweder urheberrechtsfrei sind oder unter ei- ner freien Lizenz stehen. Das Projekt wurde am 24. November 2003 gestartet. Der Wiktionary-EIntrag zum Wort Schnee: Das Wörterbuch präsen- Zunächst mehrsprachig auf einer gemeinsamen tiert Bedeutung, Deklination, Synonyme und Übersetzungen. Plattform angelegt, wurde es später in einzel- ne Sprachversionen aufgesplittet. Das deutsche Teilprojekt zählte im März 2006 über 2000 Texte Wikisource-Mitarbeiter arbeiten an einer digitalen, korrekturge- und über 100 registrierte Benutzer. lesenen und annotierten Ausgabe der Zimmerischen Chronik. Wikibooks Das im Juli 2003 aus der Taufe gehobene Projekt Wikibooks dient der gemeinschaftlichen Schaf- fung freier Lehrmaterialien – vom Schulbuch über den Sprachkurs bis zum praktischen Klet- terhandbuch oder der Go-Spielanleitung Wikiquote Wikiquote zielt darauf ab, auf Wiki-Basis ein freies Kompendium von Zitaten und Das Wikibooks-Handbuch Go enthält eine ausführliche Spielanleitung Sprichwörtern in jeder Sprache zu schaffen. Die des japanischen Strategiespiels. Artikel über Zitate bieten (soweit bekannt) eine Quellenangabe und werden gegebenenfalls in die deutsche Sprache übersetzt. Für zusätzliche Das Wikimedia-Projekt Wikiquote sammelt Sprichwörter und Informationen sorgen Links in die Wikipedia. Zitate, hier die Seite zum Schauspieler Woody Allen Wikimedia Commons Wikimedia Commons wurde im September 2004 zur zentralen Aufbewahrung von Multime- dia-Material – Bilder, Videos, Musik – für alle Wi- kimedia-Projekte gegründet.
    [Show full text]
  • Thank You - Wiktionary 4/24/11 9:56 PM Thank You
    thank you - Wiktionary 4/24/11 9:56 PM thank you Definition from Wiktionary, the free dictionary See also thankyou and thank-you Contents 1 English 1.1 Etymology 1.2 Pronunciation 1.3 Interjection 1.3.1 Synonyms 1.3.2 Translations 1.4 Noun 1.5 References 1.6 See also English Etymology Thank you is a shortened expression for I thank you; it is attested since c. 1400.[1] Pronunciation Audio (UK) (file) Interjection thank you 1. An expression of gratitude or politeness, in response to something done or given. http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/thank_you Page 1 of 5 thank you - Wiktionary 4/24/11 9:56 PM Synonyms cheers (informal), thanks, thanks very much, thank you very much, thanks a lot, ta (UK, Australia), thanks a bunch (informal), thanks a million (informal), much obliged Translations an expression of gratitude [hide ▲] Select targeted languages ﺳﻮﭘﺎﺱ ,Afar: gadda ge Kurdish: spas Afrikaans: dankie, baie dankie Ladin: giulan Albanian: faleminderit, ju falem nderit Lao: (kööp cai) Gheg: falimineres Latin: benignē dīcis (la), tibi gratiās agō (la) Latvian: paldies (lv) Aleut: qaĝaasakuq (Atkan), qaĝaalakux̂ Lithuanian: ačiū (lt) (Eastern) Luo: erokamano Alutiiq: quyanaa Macedonian: благодарам (mk) (blagódaram) American Sign Language: OpenB@Chin- (formal), фала (mk) (fála) (informal) PalmBack OpenB@FromChin-PalmUp Malagasy: misaotra (mg) Amharic: (am) (amesegenallo) Malay: terima kasih (ms) (ar) (mersii) Malayalam: (ml) (nandhi) ﻣﻴﺮﺳﻲ ,(ar) (shúkran) ﺷﻜﺮًﺍ :Arabic (informal) Maltese: grazzi (mt) Armenian: Maori: kia ora (mi) շնորհակալություն
    [Show full text]
  • Detecting Non-Compositional MWE Components Using Wiktionary
    Detecting Non-compositional MWE Components using Wiktionary Bahar Salehi,♣♥ Paul Cook♥ and Timothy Baldwin♣♥ NICTA Victoria Research Laboratory Department♣ of Computing and Information Systems ♥ The University of Melbourne Victoria 3010, Australia [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] Abstract components of a given MWE have a composi- tional usage. Experiments over two widely-used We propose a simple unsupervised ap- datasets show that our approach outperforms state- proach to detecting non-compositional of-the-art methods. components in multiword expressions based on Wiktionary. The approach makes 2 Related Work use of the definitions, synonyms and trans- Previous studies which have considered MWE lations in Wiktionary, and is applicable to compositionality have focused on either the iden- any type of MWE in any language, assum- tification of non-compositional MWE token in- ing the MWE is contained in Wiktionary. stances (Kim and Baldwin, 2007; Fazly et al., Our experiments show that the proposed 2009; Forthergill and Baldwin, 2011; Muzny and approach achieves higher F-score than Zettlemoyer, 2013), or the prediction of the com- state-of-the-art methods. positionality of MWE types (Reddy et al., 2011; 1 Introduction Salehi and Cook, 2013; Salehi et al., 2014). The identification of non-compositional MWE tokens A multiword expression (MWE) is a combina- is an important task when a word combination tion of words with lexical, syntactic or seman- such as kick the bucket or saw logs is ambiguous tic idiosyncrasy (Sag et al., 2002; Baldwin and between a compositional (generally non-MWE) Kim, 2009). An MWE is considered (semanti- and non-compositional MWE usage.
    [Show full text]
  • The Wiki Family of Web Sites
    The Federal Lawyer In Cyberia MICHAEL J. TONSING The Wiki Family of Web Sites he growth in the number of informative Web set of resources. Much of what follows is drawn from the sites seems exponential. It is increasingly hard self-descriptions on the Wiki Web sites themselves. Tto keep up with them. If you’re not using the “Wiki” family of sites, you’re missing some sources that Wiktionary are almost stupefying in their scope. A “wiki” is essen- Wiktionary (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wiktionary) is tially a Web site in which contributors can add their a sister site to Wikipedia. Wiktionary is not an online own copy. (I capitalize the word in most instances in encyclopedia but an online dictionary, and its entries this column to make it clear that I am referring to a par- are about words. A Wiktionary entry focuses on mat- ticular family of wikis. There are many other wikis out ters of language and wordsmithery, spelling, pronun- there. You may decide to start your own someday.) ciation, etymology, translation, usage, quotations, and links to related words and concepts. Because Wiktion- Wikipedia ary is not written on paper, it has no size limits, it can Wikipedia (www.wikipedia.org), then, is an online include links, and its information can be more timely encyclopedia in which visitors can read infor- than that found in a written dictionary. mation on the topics they visit, then edit the information on the site itself if they choose Wikisource to do so. (The name “Wikipedia” is a meld- Wikisource (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikisource), which ing of the works “wiki” and “encyclopedia.”) dubs itself “the free library,” collects and stores previ- Out of what might at first have seemed like ously published texts in digital format; contents include online chaos has come semirespectability and novels, nonfiction works, letters, speeches, constitutional order.
    [Show full text]
  • Wikidata As a Knowledge Graph for the Life Sciences
    Washington University School of Medicine Digital Commons@Becker Open Access Publications 2020 Wikidata as a knowledge graph for the life sciences Andra Waagmeester Malachi Griffith Obi L. Griffith et al. Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.wustl.edu/open_access_pubs FEATURE ARTICLE SCIENCE FORUM Wikidata as a knowledge graph for the life sciences Abstract Wikidata is a community-maintained knowledge base that has been assembled from repositories in the fields of genomics, proteomics, genetic variants, pathways, chemical compounds, and diseases, and that adheres to the FAIR principles of findability, accessibility, interoperability and reusability. Here we describe the breadth and depth of the biomedical knowledge contained within Wikidata, and discuss the open-source tools we have built to add information to Wikidata and to synchronize it with source databases. We also demonstrate several use cases for Wikidata, including the crowdsourced curation of biomedical ontologies, phenotype-based diagnosis of disease, and drug repurposing. ANDRA WAAGMEESTER†, GREGORY STUPP†, SEBASTIAN BURGSTALLER- MUEHLBACHER, BENJAMIN M GOOD, MALACHI GRIFFITH, OBI L GRIFFITH, KRISTINA HANSPERS, HENNING HERMJAKOB, TOBY S HUDSON, KEVIN HYBISKE, SARAH M KEATING, MAGNUS MANSKE, MICHAEL MAYERS, DANIEL MIETCHEN, ELVIRA MITRAKA, ALEXANDER R PICO, TIMOTHY PUTMAN, ANDERS RIUTTA, NURIA QUERALT-ROSINACH, LYNN M SCHRIML, THOMAS SHAFEE, DENISE SLENTER, RALF STEPHAN, KATHERINE THORNTON, GINGER TSUENG, ROGER TU, SABAH UL-HASAN, EGON WILLIGHAGEN, CHUNLEI WU AND ANDREW I SU* Introduction advance efforts by the open-data community to Integrating data and knowledge is a formidable build a rich and heterogeneous network of scien- challenge in biomedical research. Although new tific knowledge. That knowledge network could, scientific findings are being discovered at a in turn, be the foundation for many computa- *For correspondence: asu@ rapid pace, a large proportion of that knowl- tional tools, applications and analyses.
    [Show full text]