Accessibility Planning – Strategy Document

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Accessibility Planning – Strategy Document Accessibility Planning – Strategy Document Study Results December 2007 City of Saskatoon – Planning Stage, Accessibility Plan for Persons in need of Accessibility Services Table of Contents Executive Summary .................................................................................. 5 1.0 Purpose of the Research.................................................................17 2.0 Significance of the Research ..........................................................18 2.1. Demographics - Canada.......................................................................................18 2.1.1. Aboriginals with Disabilities .............................................................................21 2.2. Demographics - Saskatchewan..............................................................................21 2.3. Demographics - Saskatoon...................................................................................22 2.4. Business Case.....................................................................................................23 2.4.1. Purchasing Power ...........................................................................................23 2.4.2. Labour Supply ................................................................................................23 2.4.3. Toursim.........................................................................................................24 3.0 Accessibility Planning ................................................................... 26 3.1. Definition of Disability........................................................................................26 3.2. Legislation .........................................................................................................27 3.2.1. Equal Rights...................................................................................................27 3.2.2. Building Codes ...............................................................................................28 3.2.3. Provincial Disability Acts .................................................................................28 3.2.4. Summary of the ODA 2001 and AODA 2005.....................................................34 3.3. Policy and Practice ..............................................................................................35 3.4. Municipal Accessibility Planning ...........................................................................37 3.4.1. Vancouver .....................................................................................................37 3.4.2. Toronto.........................................................................................................38 3.4.3. Mid-Size Cities ...............................................................................................38 3.4.4. City of London...............................................................................................39 3.5. Accessibility Committee Overview ........................................................................41 3.5.1. Stakeholders (Persons with Disabilities and Municipal Staff) .................................41 3.5.2. Roles and Responsibilities ................................................................................42 3.6. Accessibility Plan Overview..................................................................................44 3.7. Accessibility Awards............................................................................................45 4.0 Internal Review ............................................................................. 50 4.1. Leisure Services Department ................................................................................50 4.2. Communications Department...............................................................................51 4.3. Transit...............................................................................................................52 4.4. Urban Design.....................................................................................................53 4.5. Municipal Engineering.........................................................................................54 4.6. Clerk’s Office .....................................................................................................55 4.7. Public Works......................................................................................................56 4.8. Development Services Branch ..............................................................................57 4.9. Community Development....................................................................................57 4.10. Building Standards ..............................................................................................58 4.11. Human Resources...............................................................................................58 4.12. City Planning......................................................................................................60 4.13. Facilities Branch .................................................................................................61 4.14. Infrastructure Services Department .......................................................................61 4.15. Playground Accessibility ......................................................................................64 2 City of Saskatoon – Planning Stage, Accessibility Plan for Persons in need of Accessibility Services 4.16. A Few Notable Cities for their Efforts in Accessibility Planning ................................66 5.0 In-depth Interviews....................................................................... 73 5.1. The City of Guelph .............................................................................................73 5.2. The City of Brampton .........................................................................................76 5.3. The City of Kitchener..........................................................................................78 5.4. The City of London ............................................................................................79 5.5. The City of Regina ..............................................................................................80 5.6. The City of Calgary .............................................................................................81 5.7. The City of Winnipeg ..........................................................................................85 5.8. The City of Toronto............................................................................................92 5.9. The City of Chicago ............................................................................................95 5.10. The City of Berkeley..........................................................................................103 5.11. The City of Kelowa...........................................................................................106 5.12. The City of Kingston.........................................................................................109 6.0 Additional In-depth Interviews .................................................... 110 6.1. The Accessible / Inclusive Cities and Communities Project ....................................110 6.2. Saskatchewan Abilities Council ...........................................................................112 7.0 Focus Group Results.................................................................... 114 7.1. Summary of Focus Groups ................................................................................122 8.0 Appendix A – Additional City Summaries ...................................125 9.0 Appendix B – City of Edmonton Accessibility Checklist ............ 131 10.0 Appendix C – City Accessibility Checklist...................................135 References ..............................................................................................140 3 City of Saskatoon – Planning Stage, Accessibility Plan for Persons in need of Accessibility Services List of Figures Figure 1 - Disability rates for Canada, 2001, 2006, and 2006 age standardized ............18 Figure 2 - Disability Rates by Age and Sex (Canada).....................................................19 Figure 3 - Prevalence of disability in adults 15 years of age or older, by type of disability and age group, Canada, .................................................................................................20 Figure 4 - Disability rate, by age and province,...............................................................22 List of Tables Table 1 - Type of Disability (PALS 2006)........................................................................19 Table 2 - Number of disabilities reported in adults 15 years of age or older with disabilities, Canada, 2006...............................................................................................20 Table 3- Disability rates for Canada, 2001, 2006 and 2006 age standardized ...............21 Table 4 - Saskatchewan Population by Age Group ........................................................22 4 City of Saskatoon – Planning Stage, Accessibility Plan for Persons in need of Accessibility Services Executive Summary Purpose The purpose of this research is to create a strategy document that will guide action towards achieving the mandate of the Accessibility Advisory Committee. This report includes information on existing initiatives that have been undertaken by the City and compares them
Recommended publications
  • Consat Telematics AB
    Consat Canada Inc. Introduction . Consat . Roger Sauve . Filip Stekovic . Timmins Transit . Jamie Millions . Fred Gerrior Consat Canada Customers Timmins Transit Sudbury Transit Milton Transit Thunder Bay Transit Kawartha Lakes North Bay Transit Timiskaming Shores STM Orillia Transit NYC Kingston Transit Sudbury Municipal solutions Sarnia Transit Orangeville Transit Simcoe Transit Three more to be added in 2019 Mandatory System – AODA | Additional Features . Mandatory system – AODA compliant . Automatic Next Stop Announcement (ANSA) . Calling out stop both audibly and visually . Internally for customers on board and externally for customers at stops and platforms . Additional Features . AVL tracking of vehicles . On time performance . Ridership counts . Real time customer information . Applications for all users . Expandable solution AODA | Automatic Next Stop Announcement (ANSA) . Visual ANSA using internal display . Recorded and/or synthetic announcement voice. Reliable, configurable triggering of announcement (distance/time to stop point). AODA | Automatic Next Stop Announcement (ANSA) . External announcement of vehicle destination when arriving at stop point. Scheduled audio volume setting – minimizes noise pollution at night. Quiet stop points/areas Real time schedule monitoring . Multiple tools to follow vehicles in real-time . Event-based system with continuous updates Tools | Event Monitor & Event History Data Analysis . Specialised reports . Timetable adherence . Route analysis . Ridership analysis . System performance analysis . Vehicle communication . Vehicle speed . Troubleshooting Driver Assistant . Provides the driver real-time timetable adherence, trip information, passenger counts Automatic Passenger Counter Two Way Messaging . Communication between traffic controller and drivers . Controllers can send to single vehicles, groups and even whole routes. Controllers can use and easily create templates, with response options. Controllers have access to a message log.
    [Show full text]
  • Cuta's 2006 Fall Conference
    February/février 2007 National Transit Employee Recognition Awards 2006 · Prix nationaux de reconnaissance des employés du secteur des transports en commun 2006 CANADIAN TRANSIT CANADIEN SUR LE TRANSPORT COLLECTIF CUTA’S 2006 FALL CONFERENCE COMMUNITIES IN TRANSIT CONGRÈS D’AUTOMNE DE L’ACTU 2006 COLLECTIVITÉS EN TRANSITION PLUS: 2006 Mid-Year Ridership Results Données semestrielles 2006 de l’achalandage Quick test fact: Q’Straint rear tie-down belts along with stainless steel floor pockets and fastening hardware are static pull tested with every shipment. www.qstraint.com 312983_Qstraint.indd 1 1/3/07 12:35:10 PM We Listen, You Drive Discover the new face of performance with the line of Nova Bus transit, suburban, and shuttle vehicles. Building on our reputation for quality, our bold new front styling reflects the sound engineering and unique design features you have come to expect from every vehicle we produce. At Nova Bus, the quality is built right in. We listen, You Drive. www.novabus.com 312983_Qstraint.indd 1 1/3/07 12:35:10 PM 311734_Nova.indd 1 12/11/06 10:35:40 AM Under 30' and 35' length 12 year/500,000 mile Altoona tested 102" wide Cummins ISB-02 engine 35" front door - Vapor Optional 42" centre door Allison B300 or B300R transmission 19 – 35 passenger capacity Meritor independent front suspension KIRKMAN BUS SALES LTD. BLUE BIRD PEARSON BUS 1-888-381-3010 COACHWORKS 1-877-794-7670 CALGARY, AB 1-800-486-7122 BRANTFORD, ON 4 WESTERN CANADA EASTERN CANADA February/février 2007 Vol. 17 No. 1 CANADIAN TRANSIT CANADIEN SUR LE TRANSPORT COLLECTIF February 2007/ février 2007 CUTA Editor • Rédactrice de l’ACTU : Maureen Shuell cover • couverture Executive Editor • Rédactrice en chef : Thanks to partnerships between the various orders of government, Janine Strom new funding is making significant improvements to public transit to Contributing Editor • meet the growing needs of Canadians.
    [Show full text]
  • Metrobus Market Assessment and Strategic Direc Ons Study
    Metrobus Market Assessment and Strategic Direcons Study FINAL REPORT 2011 St. John’s Transportation Commission (Metrobus) 2011 Market Assessment and Strategic Directions Study – Executive Summary EXECUTIVE SUMMARY STUDY PROCESS Metrobus engaged Dillon Consulting Limited to provide a Market Assessment and Strategic Directions Study for the St. John’s transit system. The need for this study was precipitated by the decline in reported transit ridership since the major service changes in 2007. Both the accuracy of ridership reporting and the integrity of the revenue collection and handling systems were reviewed. As well, a major onboard passenger survey was conducted on March 23rd, 2010 to understand the characteristics of current transit users and to probe their reactions to the recent service changes. Additional surveys were conducted with post secondary students, local businesses and the general public (through the Metrobus web site). Individual stakeholder meetings and focus groups with system personnel and transit users also contributed valuable input to the study. The current services were reviewed by an experienced team of consultants and suggestions offered for system enhancements and productivity improvements. Future transit market opportunities were identified for their potential to generate ridership growth and assessed for the resulting implications on Metrobus. Finally, the material gathered and analyzed was used to assist Metrobus management staff in updating their existing Five Year Strategic Plan for the period 2011 to 2015. KEY FINDINGS Concerning the integrity of the revenue collection and handling systems, the review indicated that there is no cause for concern. Duties are clear and separated, secure processes are in place and revenue is protected.
    [Show full text]
  • A Unified Health Transportation Service in Sarnia/Lambton Appendix
    A Report by the Sarnia/Lambton Health Transportation Working Group to The Erie St. Clair Local Health Integration Network for A Unified Health Transportation Service in Sarnia/Lambton Appendix November 2013 Appendices Planning Documents 1. Sarnia/Lambton Transportation Working Group Terms of Reference 2. Sarnia/Lambton Transportation Working Group Work Plan 3. Sarnia/Lambton Transportation Working Group Communication Plan 4. Sarnia/Lambton Transportation Working Group Contact List 5. Erie St. Clair LHIN Vehicle Replacement Policy 6. Transportation for Health Services in Sarnia Lambton - Constitution Presentations 7. Lambton Elderly Outreach 8. Lambton County Developmental Services 9. Canadian Red Cross 10. Family Services Kent 11. Easy Ride 12. Cancer Society 13. MetroLinx Reports 14. Dillon Report 15. Lambton Lift 16. Toronto Ride 17. Toronto Ride Memorandum of Understanding 18. South West Proposal 19. County of Simcoe Survey Results 20. NSM LHIN Transportation project 21. Eric Marr Thesis 22. OTN Listing 23. The Road Ahead 24. Canadian Red Cross and Lambton Elderly Outreach Memorandum of Understanding 25. Transportation Survey 59 DRAFT Terms of Reference for a Sarnia/Lambton Health Services Transportation Working Group Vision The Sarnia/Lambton Transportation Working Group will establish an integrated transportation system for health services in Sarnia/Lambton. The working group will strive to achieve this goal through a process that: 1. Brings together those agencies providing transportation services for medical, health, and social services in Sarnia/Lambton. 2. Unifies advertising and promotion, nature of service, fee structures, dispatching, software, fleet operations, routes, revenue/costs, client profiles (health/social) and other information that is required to provide an integrated service.
    [Show full text]
  • Archived Content Contenu Archivé
    ARCHIVED - Archiving Content ARCHIVÉE - Contenu archivé Archived Content Contenu archivé Information identified as archived is provided for L’information dont il est indiqué qu’elle est archivée reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. It est fournie à des fins de référence, de recherche is not subject to the Government of Canada Web ou de tenue de documents. Elle n’est pas Standards and has not been altered or updated assujettie aux normes Web du gouvernement du since it was archived. Please contact us to request Canada et elle n’a pas été modifiée ou mise à jour a format other than those available. depuis son archivage. Pour obtenir cette information dans un autre format, veuillez communiquer avec nous. This document is archival in nature and is intended Le présent document a une valeur archivistique et for those who wish to consult archival documents fait partie des documents d’archives rendus made available from the collection of Public Safety disponibles par Sécurité publique Canada à ceux Canada. qui souhaitent consulter ces documents issus de sa collection. Some of these documents are available in only one official language. Translation, to be provided Certains de ces documents ne sont disponibles by Public Safety Canada, is available upon que dans une langue officielle. Sécurité publique request. Canada fournira une traduction sur demande. The Geeng Out He ndboo red 78 1 , .05 G4 c . 3 •0 00 0 11 118 0 0 011 0 0 00110 0 11 1100 000 8011110011 •11 0011 811011 The Getting Out Hancil2ook 10 111 • Gptt 11 Table of Contents •
    [Show full text]
  • Improving Cleanliness and Customer Satisfaction by Reducing Bacterial Exposure on Public Transit “Don’T Touch That, Its Dirty”
    Improving Cleanliness and Customer Satisfaction by Reducing Bacterial Exposure on Public Transit “Don’t touch that, its dirty” • A common perception is that public surfaces are dirty or covered in germs and it is a top reason for people NOT to ride public transit • There is truth, in fact, that the surfaces around us are covered in germs and often exposed to potentially harmful bacteria including Coronavirus, Staphylococcus infections, MRSA, VRE, Clostridium difficile, H1N1 and so on • Reducing the risk on public transit can increase customer satisfaction and ridership 2 Technologies • Protect Technologies executive has an extensive healthcare background and have a deep understanding of infection control and bacteria Exclusive • Our technical advisor has worked with the AEGIS molecule for over 20 years. distributor of • Microban has authorized Protect as the exclusive distributor of AEGIS in Canada • AEGIS is the only durable antimicrobial approved by health Canada (PMRA PCP # 15133) • Green technology US EPA #64881-2 • With Protect technologies and our partners, you will be assured that the product being applied is the Aegis Microbe Shield, which is the only chemistry approved for application on surfaces such as those at risk in the TTC. Our product is backed by Microban so you can be assured of product performance. 3 Surface Modification • Improve customer satisfaction through Surface modification that protects all surfaces from germs with AEGIS Microbe Shield. • Protect employees and customers by protecting surfaces from harmful microorganisms and related odours. • AEGIS stops bacteria from surviving on surfaces preventing person to surface to person transmission. • Application lasts two years on hard and soft surfaces.
    [Show full text]
  • 042518Vii1.Pdf
    Staff Report #1 April 25, 2018 To All Commissioners Re: Industrial Service Strategy Update Recommendation That the Commission ENDORSE the following service delivery models as options for discussion at the May 15, 2018 meeting with Industrial Service stakeholders: • Fixed Route • Trippers • Branch Route • Employment/Industrial Shuttle • On-Demand Service • Dynamic Service Delivery Options including: o First Mile / Last Mile o Micro Transit o Flex Routes o Specialized Integration o Guaranteed Ride Home o Trip Planning Integration Background At the January 25, 2017 meeting, the Commission requested a review and update of the data used to inform the Industrial Service Strategy, including an assessment of the areas where Londoners currently are unable to access employment opportunities in industrial areas via regular public transit due to gaps in either service coverage or time of day. Further, the request was to involve the London Economic Development Corporation as well as the London Chamber of Commerce in the review, noting opportunities for new delivery models may be identified, including but not limited to partnering with businesses in the area to cost-share the service delivery. The focus of the industrial service review are lands zoned industrial, which currently have transit service provided during limited times of the day or are without nearby transit service. The areas identified are: the Airport Industrial area, Sovereign Road, Veteran’s Memorial Parkway (VMP/401), Wilton Grove and Exeter/White Oaks Road. Transit services to modern industrial areas are a complex issue influenced by a number of challenges, many of which are competing in nature. The complexities and challenges associated with providing transit service to industrial areas are not limited or unique to London.
    [Show full text]
  • Improving Cleanliness and Customer Satisfaction by Reducing Bacterial Exposure on Locomotives “Don’T Touch That, Its Dirty”
    Improving Cleanliness and Customer Satisfaction by Reducing Bacterial Exposure on Locomotives “Don’t touch that, its dirty” • Hand sanitizers and disinfecting wipes are at best temporary solutions. They can kill germs if used properly. But even when used properly, the minute they dry their effect is over. The next cough, sneeze, or touch by someone’s hand and those unprotected surfaces are at risk for recontamination. • There is truth, in fact, that the surfaces around us are covered in germs and often exposed to potentially harmful bacteria including Coronavirus, Staphylococcus infections, MRSA, VRE, Clostridium difficile, H1N1 and so on. • AEGIS Microbe Shield has demonstrated long term effect protecting surfaces from microbes. 2 Technologies • Protect Technologies executive has an extensive healthcare background and have a deep understanding of infection control and bacteria Exclusive • Our technical advisor has worked with the AEGIS molecule for over 20 years. distributor of • Microban has authorized Protect as the exclusive distributor of AEGIS in Canada • AEGIS is the only durable antimicrobial approved by health Canada (PMRA PCP # 15133) • Green technology US EPA #64881-2 • With Protect technologies and our partners, you will be assured that the product being applied is the Aegis Microbe Shield, which is the only chemistry approved for application on surfaces such as those at risk in the locomotive. Our product is backed by Microban so you can be assured of product performance. 3 Surface Modification • Improve customer satisfaction through Surface modification that protects all surfaces from germs with AEGIS Microbe Shield • Protect employees and customers by protecting surfaces from harmful microorganisms and related odours • AEGIS stops bacteria from surviving on surfaces preventing person to surface to person transmission.
    [Show full text]
  • TPI ANNUAL REPORT Transit Procurement Made Easy
    2017 – 2018 TPI ANNUAL REPORT Transit Procurement Made Easy TABLE OF CONTENTS MESSAGE FROM THE PRESIDENT & CEO .................................................................... 3 MESSAGE FROM THE MANAGER OF TPI ..................................................................... 3 TPI’S GOVERNANCE STRUCTURE ................................................................................. 4 TPI STRATEGIC ADVISORY COMMITTEE ...................................................................... 4 OUR VALUED PARTNERS .............................................................................................. 5 KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS ............................................................................... 6 OTHER TANGIBLE BENEFITS ........................................................................................ 9 2017 – 2018 ACTIVE CONTRACTS .............................................................................. 10 TPI FACT SHEET .......................................................................................................... 14 UPCOMING INITIATIVES IN 2018 – 2019 .................................................................... 15 TPI TEAM NEWS .......................................................................................................... 15 2017 – 2018 HIGHLIGHTS • 5 new Municipal Partners joining the program (page 6) • 93% average client satisfaction (page 7) TPI • 18.4% growth in bus order intake (page 8) • Overall program savings/cost avoidance est. $25.9 million (page 8) • Supplier
    [Show full text]
  • SPECIALIZED TRANSIT ELIGIBILITY CERTIFICATION PROGRAMS Overview of Canadian and U.S
    Canadian Specialized Transit Eligibility Certification Program Overview of U.S. and Canadian Experience Canadian Urban Transit Association Canadian Urban Transit Association SPECIALIZED TRANSIT ELIGIBILITY CERTIFICATION PROGRAMS Overview of Canadian and U.S. Experience 2013 i Canadian Specialized Transit Eligibility Certification Program Overview of U.S. and Canadian Experience Canadian Urban Transit Association ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This research was coordinated and managed through the CUTA Strategic Research Program. This project has been made possible through the financial contributions of the following organizations: Calgary Transit Edmonton Transit System - DATS Fredericton Transit Grand River Transit HSR (Hamilton) OC Transpo (Ottawa) Q-Straint Red Deer Transit Regina Transit Rocky View Regional Handibus Sarnia Transit Saskatoon Transit St. Albert Transit TransHelp (Peel Region) TransLink Trapeze Group Whitehorse Transit York Region Transit The following individuals generously volunteered their time and wisdom as part of the project steering committee: AJ Ryland (Ottawa), Dave Smith (Grand River Transit), Karim Rayani (Calgary), Lorna Stewart (Edmonton), Lynette Griffin (Regina), Mark Castro (Peel Region), Meaghan Wilkinson (Trapeze), Owen Quinn (Hamilton), Peter Hill/Sarah Chung and Merrilee Ashworth (Translink), Renaud Drolet (STM), Sharon Doyle (York Region). Thank you to the following Transit Systems who were interviewed for this report: TTC Wheel Trans (Toronto), TransLink HandyDART (Vancouver), Montréal STM Transport adpaté, TransHelp (Peel Region), Access Calgary, Para Transpo (Ottawa), Handi-Transit (Winnipeg), Accessible Transportation Services (Hamilton), CIT Laurentides, Société de transport de Laval, Access-a-Bus (Halifax), London Transit Commission, handyDART (Victoria), Regina Paratransit Service, Independence Plus/Handi-Bus (St. John’s), Milton Transit, Red Deer Transit / Transit Action Bus, MRC Les Maskoutains, Peterborough Transit, and Whitehorse Transit i Canadian Specialized Transit Eligibility Certification Program Overview of U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Canadian Code of Practice for Determining Eligibility for Specialized Transit
    Canadian Specialized Transit Eligibility Certification Program Overview of U.S. and Canadian Experience Canadian Urban Transit Association Canadian Urban Transit Association Canadian Code of Practice for Determining Eligibility for Specialized Transit 2013 Nelson\Nygaard Consulting Associates Inc. | i ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This research was coordinated and managed through the CUTA Strategic Research Program. This project has been made possible through the financial contributions of the following organizations: Calgary Transit Edmonton Transit System - DATS Fredericton Transit Grand River Transit HSR (Hamilton) OC Transpo (Ottawa) Q-Straint Red Deer Transit Regina Transit Rocky View Regional Handibus Sarnia Transit Saskatoon Transit St. Albert Transit TransHelp (Peel Region) TransLink Trapeze Group Whitehorse Transit York Region Transit The following individuals generously volunteered their time and wisdom as part of the project steering committee: AJ Ryland (Ottawa), Dave Smith (Grand River Transit), Karim Rayani (Calgary), Lorna Stewart (Edmonton), Lynette Griffin (Regina), Mark Castro (Peel Region), Meaghan Wilkinson (Trapeze), Owen Quinn (Hamilton), Peter Hill/Sarah Chung and Merrilee Ashworth (Translink), Renaud Drolet (STM), Sharon Doyle (York Region). Thank you to the following Transit Systems who were interviewed for this report: TTC Wheel Trans (Toronto), TransLink HandyDART (Vancouver), Montréal STM Transport adpaté, TransHelp (Peel Region), Access Calgary, Para Transpo (Ottawa), Handi-Transit (Winnipeg), Accessible Transportation
    [Show full text]
  • The Municipality of Lambton Shores Transit System Feasibility Study Final Draft Report
    The Municipality of Lambton Shores Transit System Feasibility Study Final Draft Report December 10, 2019 Transit Consulting Network 2019 The Municipality of Lambton Shores Transit System Feasibility Study Municipality of Lambton Shores Project Team Project Team Glen Baillie, Chair, Huron Shores Transit Steering Committee Kevin Williams, CAO, Municipality of Lambton Shores Transit Consulting Network Project Team Principal & Project Manager Wally Beck, C.E.T. Project Team Charles Fitzsimmons, Senior Consultant, Specialized Transit Kim Laursen, Technical and Administrative Support ii | P a g e 2019 The Municipality of Lambton Shores Transit System Feasibility Study TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Introduction and Background .............................................................................................1 1.1 Background ....................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Understanding ................................................................................................................... 1 1.3 Study Objectives ................................................................................................................ 2 1.4 The Case to Support Transit .............................................................................................. 3 1.5 Study Work Plan ................................................................................................................ 4 2. Community Engagement ....................................................................................................5
    [Show full text]