Results of Mid-Winter Waterbird Counts in Iran in the Early 1970S

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Results of Mid-Winter Waterbird Counts in Iran in the Early 1970S Podoces, 2010, 5(1): 11–28 Results of Mid-winter Waterbird Counts in Iran in the Early 1970s DEREK A. SCOTT Castletownbere Post Office, Castletownbere, Co. Cork, IRELAND. Email: [email protected] Accepted 21 September 2010 Abstract: The mid-winter waterbird counts in Iran were initiated by the Department of the Environment in January 1967. The counts focused on pelicans, flamingos, swans, geese, ducks, cranes and coots, but some counts were also made of other species of waterbirds. By the early 1970s, the counts were sufficiently comprehensive to enable estimations to be made of the total numbers of many species of waterbirds present in Iran in the mid-winter period. The overall results of the counts and these population estimates are presented in a series of tables. It was estimated that in an ‘average’ year in the early 1970s, there were approximately 2,000–2,200 pelicans, 48,000–51,000 flamingos, 380–460 swans, 27,000– 32,000 geese, 2.0–2.4 million ducks, 2,300–2,800 cranes and 370,000–410,000 coots wintering in Iran. The number of birds reaching Iran in autumn and remaining throughout the winter was greatly affected by weather conditions both in Iran and in the north Caspian region. In mild winters, large numbers of the hardier species, notably the swans Cygnus spp., remained throughout the winter in the north Caspian, while in extremely severe winters, a large part of the Russian wintering populations moved south into northern Iran. In dry years, when many of the wetlands in Khuzestan, central Fars and Seistan remained dry throughout the winter, large numbers of waterbirds continued on south to winter in the Indian subcontinent or Mesopotamia. In the winter of 1969/70, when conditions were unusually mild in northwestern Iran, large numbers of birds overwintered in the wetlands of the Urumiyeh basin in Azarbaijan, but in most years these wetlands froze over in December, and most birds had left the area by the time of the mid-winter counts. Keywords: Iran, mid-winter, population estimation, waterbird count, waterfowl, wetland. INTRODUCTION wildfowl constitute a natural resource of considerable economic importance, it was The present note is intended as a brief summary evident that efforts should be made to manage of the results of the mid-winter waterbird counts the populations on a sustainable basis through carried out at wetlands throughout Iran during the rationalisation of hunting regulations and the five winters from 1970/71 to 1974/75. The creation of protected areas throughout the birds’ full results of these mid-winter counts were flyways. The first step was to estimate the total presented in a series of Department of the size of the wildfowl populations and to Environment Project Completion Reports determine if the populations were declining, as produced at the time, and the census data were was believed to be the case by many observers. submitted to the International Wildfowl Mid-winter counts of wildfowl had been going Research Bureau (IWRB – later to become the on in some European countries for a number of International Wetlands and Waterfowl Research years, but it was not until January 1967 that the Bureau and ultimately Wetlands International). IWRB began to co-ordinate these counts at an Annual mid-winter counts of waterbirds in international level and to encourage as many Iran were initiated by the Iran Game and Fish countries as possible in Europe and western Asia Department (later to become the Iran to participate. Iran was one of the first countries Department of the Environment) in the winter of to join in these counts (now known as the 1966/1967 as part of an international effort to International Waterbird Census (IWC)) and monitor populations of ‘wildfowl’ – species of submit its census data in the appropriate format ducks, geese, swans and coots – that were to IWRB for inclusion in an international subjected to heavy hunting pressure by sport database. hunters and market hunters throughout Europe In the early years of the IWC, the counts and western Asia. As the large populations of focused almost exclusively on species of 11 Results of mid-winter waterbird counts in Iran in the early 1970s – D.A. Scott Anatidae (ducks, geese and swans) and Eurasian 1970s were used extensively in the identification Coots Fulica atra, although participants were of sites for designation as Important Bird Areas also encouraged to count Greater Flamingos under the BirdLife International initiative (Evans Phoenicopterus (ruber) roseus and the two 1994), and also in the identification of wetlands species of pelican, Great White Pelican of international importance for inclusion in A Pelecanus onocrotalus and Dalmatian Pelican P. Directory of Wetlands in the Middle East (Scott crispus, as these were the subject of international 1995). conservation efforts and generally encountered in the same habitats as wintering wildfowl. In Iran, the Common Crane Grus grus was also DEVELOPMENT OF THE COUNTS included in the counts from the outset, as this was another species that was the subject of In mid-January 1967, the newly created Game international attention and was a conspicuous and Fish Department of Iran requested David element of the wintering waterbird populations Ferguson, an American Peace Corps Volunteer in several regions of Iran. Thus, throughout the attached to the organisation, to proceed to the late 1960s and 1970s, the primary objective of southwest Caspian region in Gilan Province and, the mid-winter counts in Iran was to count as in collaboration with two Provincial Department many as possible of the pelicans, flamingos, Officers, initiate a duck-ringing programme. At swans, geese, ducks, cranes and coots present in the same time, Ferguson made an attempt to Iran during the mid-winter period. census wildfowl in the Anzali Mordab area. The No special effort was made to count other results of this census were forwarded to the species of waterbirds, and only those wetlands Asiatic Wildfowl Survey in Pakistan and IWRB frequented by the target species were routinely in the U.K., and marked the first time that Iran visited by the teams of counters. Indeed, it was had participated in international wildfowl counts. not until the launch of the Asian Waterbird In the same winter, Lindon Cornwallis, a lecturer Census by IWRB in January 1987 that all at the University of Shiraz, was carrying out species of waterbirds were officially included in avifaunal surveys in the wetlands of central Fars, the counts. However, several of the experienced and provided counts of wildfowl at nine sites in ornithologists participating in the mid-winter this province. In the following winter (1967/68), counts in Iran in the late 1960s and early 1970s Ferguson counted wildfowl at 24 sites in Gilan kept records of all other species of waterbirds and also carried out a partial survey of Gorgan recorded during the wildfowl counts and in many Bay in Mazandaran, while Cornwallis again cases gave estimates of numbers. This was counted wildfowl at nine sites in central Fars. particularly the case during the period 1970/71 to The same sites were counted in the winter of 1975/76, when the author made a habit of 1968/69, along with the Dasht-e Moghan in counting all species of waterbirds present at each Azarbaijan and the lakes on the Turkman Steppe site, with the exception of some of the in Golestan. In the winter of 1969/70, a team led commoner gulls Larus spp. by Cornwallis carried out the first ever counts at Little information on the mid-winter wetlands in the Seistan basin and also visited the waterbird counts in Iran in the 1960s and 1970s Hamoun-e Jaz Murian, although this was has appeared in the published literature. completely dry at the time. This team also Ferguson (1972) summarised some of the early counted the wetlands in central Fars, while work in the south Caspian region in the late another team led by Hubert Kowalski and Alain 1960s, while Scott & Carp (1972) reported on Tamisier, two French ornithologists from the the first mid-winter wildfowl counts in Station Biologique de la Tour du Valat in Khuzestan Province in 1971. Summers et al. France, counted wetlands in Golestan, (1987) provided estimates for the wintering Mazandaran, Gilan, Azarbaijan, Kordestan, populations of waders in Iran, based very largely Kermanshah, Tehran and Esfahan. on the mid-winter counts in the 1970s, and Shortly after the arrival of the author at the Perennou et al. (1994) presented the annual Game and Fish Department in late 1970, a species totals for pelicans, flamingos, swans, permanent Ornithology Unit was established geese, ducks, cranes and coots for the period within the Department, and one of its primary 1967 to 1986. The mid-winter counts in the tasks was to organise the annual mid-winter 12 Podoces, 2010, 5(1): 11–28 wildfowl censuses and expand these to cover the that they observed. Because of the difficulties in entire country. Between the end of December identifying the pelicans, swans, geese and some 1970 and early March 1971, all major wetlands species of ducks to species level, especially in the south Caspian region, Azarbaijan, without the aid of binoculars, provincial Kordestan, Kermanshah, Esfahan, Khuzestan, personnel were requested to give only the total Fars and Seistan were visited by Ornithology figures for pelicans (both species), swans (all Unit personnel, and for the first time, counts species), geese (all species) and ducks (all were made at wetlands along the coast of the species except Ruddy Shelduck Tadorna Persian Gulf and Persian Baluchestan. ferruginea). The counts of Greater Flamingos, Thereafter, in each of the following four winters, Ruddy Shelducks, Common Cranes and efforts were made to cover all important sites in Eurasian Coots posed no problems as these were the five major wetland regions in Iran – the south well known birds and readily identifiable in the Caspian region (Gilan, Mazandaran and field.
Recommended publications
  • Review and Updated Checklist of Freshwater Fishes of Iran: Taxonomy, Distribution and Conservation Status
    Iran. J. Ichthyol. (March 2017), 4(Suppl. 1): 1–114 Received: October 18, 2016 © 2017 Iranian Society of Ichthyology Accepted: February 30, 2017 P-ISSN: 2383-1561; E-ISSN: 2383-0964 doi: 10.7508/iji.2017 http://www.ijichthyol.org Review and updated checklist of freshwater fishes of Iran: Taxonomy, distribution and conservation status Hamid Reza ESMAEILI1*, Hamidreza MEHRABAN1, Keivan ABBASI2, Yazdan KEIVANY3, Brian W. COAD4 1Ichthyology and Molecular Systematics Research Laboratory, Zoology Section, Department of Biology, College of Sciences, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran 2Inland Waters Aquaculture Research Center. Iranian Fisheries Sciences Research Institute. Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization, Bandar Anzali, Iran 3Department of Natural Resources (Fisheries Division), Isfahan University of Technology, Isfahan 84156-83111, Iran 4Canadian Museum of Nature, Ottawa, Ontario, K1P 6P4 Canada *Email: [email protected] Abstract: This checklist aims to reviews and summarize the results of the systematic and zoogeographical research on the Iranian inland ichthyofauna that has been carried out for more than 200 years. Since the work of J.J. Heckel (1846-1849), the number of valid species has increased significantly and the systematic status of many of the species has changed, and reorganization and updating of the published information has become essential. Here we take the opportunity to provide a new and updated checklist of freshwater fishes of Iran based on literature and taxon occurrence data obtained from natural history and new fish collections. This article lists 288 species in 107 genera, 28 families, 22 orders and 3 classes reported from different Iranian basins. However, presence of 23 reported species in Iranian waters needs confirmation by specimens.
    [Show full text]
  • Bulletin 2019
    Forum der Iranischen Demokrat*innen in Hannover 1. Mai Bulletin 2019 ßung, dann gegen eine Es sind schlechte Zeiten ebenso gravierende Privati- für iranische Arbei- sierung, deren Auswirkun- ter*innen gen seit 2014 verheerend sind. So schuften über 4.000 Arbeiter*innen für Geringe Löhne, lange Ar- die Profite ihrer Chefs, er- beitszeiten und unsichere hielten jedoch schon zum Arbeitsplätze: Auch im wiederholten Male keine Jahr 2019 kämpfen viele Löhne. iranische Arbeiter*innen um das nackte Überleben. Bereits 2017 beschwerten Und eine Besserung ist sich die Beschäftigten in nicht in Sicht. einem offenen Brief vom 8. Folglich vergeht kaum Oktober 2017, und beklag- Jahr 2008 gründeten die eine Woche, in der im ten konkret, dass Sie seit Arbeitnehmer nach einem 42-tägigen Streik eine un- Iran keine Arbeiterprotes- dem Verkauf des Zucker- abhängige Gewerkschaft, te stattfinden, wobei die rohrunternehmens an den die sich der IUL anschloss, Forderungen stets diesel- privaten Sektor im März und forderten daraufhin ben sind: Nicht bezahlte 2016 „mehr als ein Jahr langjährige Lohnrückstän- Löhne, mangelnde lang Leiden und Qualen de. Im Juni diesen Jahres, Rechtssicherheit und über sich ergehen lassen legten die Arbeiter erneut schlechte Arbeitsbedin- mussten, ferner wären Pro- ihre Arbeit nieder und hiel- gungen. teste und Versammlungen ten Demonstrationen ab, Schon seit über zehn Jah- die einzige Möglichkeit für um die Zahlung von Lohn- ren kämpft die Beleg- die Belegschaft, ihre recht- schaft der größten Zu- rückständen von bis zu vier mäßigen Löhne zu erkämp- ckerfabrik des Irans in Monaten zu fordern.“ fen. Haft-Tapeh. Zunächst ge- Der iranischen Arbeits- gen die komplette Schlie- Die Internationale Gewerk- schaft der Lebensmittel- rechtsaktivist Esmail Bakhs- branche, sowie verbündete hi und die Journalistin Sepi- Arbeitnehmer (IUL) äußer- deh Gholian, die am 20.
    [Show full text]
  • Rare Birds in Iran in the Late 1960S and 1970S
    Podoces, 2008, 3(1/2): 1–30 Rare Birds in Iran in the Late 1960s and 1970s DEREK A. SCOTT Castletownbere Post Office, Castletownbere, Co. Cork, Ireland. Email: [email protected] Received 26 July 2008; accepted 14 September 2008 Abstract: The 12-year period from 1967 to 1978 was a period of intense ornithological activity in Iran. The Ornithology Unit in the Department of the Environment carried out numerous surveys throughout the country; several important international ornithological expeditions visited Iran and subsequently published their findings, and a number of resident and visiting bird-watchers kept detailed records of their observations and submitted these to the Ornithology Unit. These activities added greatly to our knowledge of the status and distribution of birds in Iran, and produced many records of birds which had rarely if ever been recorded in Iran before. This paper gives details of all records known to the author of 92 species that were recorded as rarities in Iran during the 12-year period under review. These include 18 species that had not previously been recorded in Iran, a further 67 species that were recorded on fewer than 13 occasions, and seven slightly commoner species for which there were very few records prior to 1967. All records of four distinctive subspecies are also included. The 29 species that were known from Iran prior to 1967 but not recorded during the period under review are listed in an Appendix. Keywords: Rare birds, rarities, 1970s, status, distribution, Iran. INTRODUCTION Eftekhar, E. Kahrom and J. Mansoori, several of whom quickly became keen ornithologists.
    [Show full text]
  • Ramsar Sites in Order of Addition to the Ramsar List of Wetlands of International Importance
    Ramsar sites in order of addition to the Ramsar List of Wetlands of International Importance RS# Country Site Name Desig’n Date 1 Australia Cobourg Peninsula 8-May-74 2 Finland Aspskär 28-May-74 3 Finland Söderskär and Långören 28-May-74 4 Finland Björkör and Lågskär 28-May-74 5 Finland Signilskär 28-May-74 6 Finland Valassaaret and Björkögrunden 28-May-74 7 Finland Krunnit 28-May-74 8 Finland Ruskis 28-May-74 9 Finland Viikki 28-May-74 10 Finland Suomujärvi - Patvinsuo 28-May-74 11 Finland Martimoaapa - Lumiaapa 28-May-74 12 Finland Koitilaiskaira 28-May-74 13 Norway Åkersvika 9-Jul-74 14 Sweden Falsterbo - Foteviken 5-Dec-74 15 Sweden Klingavälsån - Krankesjön 5-Dec-74 16 Sweden Helgeån 5-Dec-74 17 Sweden Ottenby 5-Dec-74 18 Sweden Öland, eastern coastal areas 5-Dec-74 19 Sweden Getterön 5-Dec-74 20 Sweden Store Mosse and Kävsjön 5-Dec-74 21 Sweden Gotland, east coast 5-Dec-74 22 Sweden Hornborgasjön 5-Dec-74 23 Sweden Tåkern 5-Dec-74 24 Sweden Kvismaren 5-Dec-74 25 Sweden Hjälstaviken 5-Dec-74 26 Sweden Ånnsjön 5-Dec-74 27 Sweden Gammelstadsviken 5-Dec-74 28 Sweden Persöfjärden 5-Dec-74 29 Sweden Tärnasjön 5-Dec-74 30 Sweden Tjålmejaure - Laisdalen 5-Dec-74 31 Sweden Laidaure 5-Dec-74 32 Sweden Sjaunja 5-Dec-74 33 Sweden Tavvavuoma 5-Dec-74 34 South Africa De Hoop Vlei 12-Mar-75 35 South Africa Barberspan 12-Mar-75 36 Iran, I. R.
    [Show full text]
  • Karim Dahimi Place of Birth
    Page 1 of 15 Witness Statement of Karim Dahimi Witness Statement of Karim Dahimi Name: Karim Dahimi Place of Birth: Ahvaz, Iran Date of Birth: September 23, 1971 Occupation: Teacher Interviewing Organization: Iran Human Rights Documentation Center (IHRDC) Date of Interview: September 25, 2012 Interviewer: IHRDC Staff This statement was prepared pursuant to an interview with Karim Dahimi. It was approved by Karim Dahimi on September 25, 2013. There are 66 paragraphs in the statement. The views and opinions of the witness expressed herein do not necessarily reflect those of the Iran Human Rights Documentation Center. Page 2 of 15 Witness Statement of Karim Dahimi Statement Introduction 1. My name is Karim Dahimi. I was born in October, 1971. I was a schoolteacher and a resident of the Kuh Alavi neighborhood of Ahvaz. I am married and have three children. Initial Activities 2. My [cultural] activities began in 1989. I received my high school diploma in 1989-90 and from 1991-93, I was a university student majoring in education. Our activities at the time were limited to the distribution of statements and having connections with other groups in Mohammareh, Fallahiyeh1, Shush and other cities to hold cultural gatherings such as poetry readings. We did not engage in any other activities. Nevertheless, my file [with the security services] listed these activities as "intelligence-gathering" and "actions against national security." There was only one thing [that I did] that could have been considered very dangerous from the point of view of the Islamic Republic; my actions in relation to the sugarcane project.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation of Karun River Water Quality Scenarios Using Simulation Model Results
    Available online at http://www.ijabbr.com International journal of Advanced Biological and Biomedical Research Volume 2, Issue 2, 2014: 339-358 Evaluation of Karun River Water Quality Scenarios Using Simulation Model Results Mohammad Bagherian Marzouni a*, Ali Mohammad Akhoundalib, Hadi Moazedc, Nematollah Jaafarzadehd,e, Javad Ahadianf, Houshang Hasoonizadehg a Master Science of Civil & Environmental Eng, Faculty of Water Science Eng, Shahid Chamran University Of Ahwaz b Alimohammad Akhoondali, Professor of Water Eng, Faculty of Water Science Eng, Shahid Chamran University Of Ahwaz c Professor of Civil & Environmental Eng, Faculty of Water Science Eng, Shahid Chamran University Of Ahwaz d Environmental Technology Research Center, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran e School of Health, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran. f Assistant Professor of Water Eng, Faculty of Water Science Eng, Shahid Chamran University Of Ahwaz g Vice Basic Studies and Comprehensive Plans for Water Resources. Khuzestan Water and Power Authority. *Corresponding author: [email protected] ABSTRACT Karun River is the largest and most watery river in Iran. This river is the longest river which located just inside Iran and Ahvaz Metropolis drinking water supplied from Karun River as well (fa.alalam.ir). Karun River as the main source of water treatment plants in Ahvaz, like most surface waters affected by various contaminants which caused changes in water quality of the river (www.aww.co.ir). Causes such as constructing several dams at upstream river, withdrawal of water from the upstream to the needs of other regions of Iran, exposure of various industries along the river and discharge of industrial and urban sewage into the river, seen that today this river is deteriorating rapidly, qua today is the depth of river reach to 1 m with a high concentration of pollutants (www.tasnimnews.com).
    [Show full text]
  • IN IRAN Submitted to the Graduate College of Bowling Green Fulfillment
    HISTORY AND DEVELOPMENT OF BROADCASTING IN IRAN Bigan Kimiachi A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate College of Bowling Green State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY June 1978 © 1978 BI GAN KIMIACHI ALL RIGHTS RESERVED n iii ABSTRACT Geophysical and geopolitical pecularities of Iran have made it a land of international importance throughout recorded history, especially since its emergence in the twentieth century as a dominant power among the newly affluent oil-producing nations of the Middle East. Nearly one-fifth the size of the United States, with similar extremes of geography and climate, and a population approaching 35 million, Iran has been ruled since 1941 by His Majesty Shahanshah Aryamehr. While he has sought to restore and preserve the cultural heritage of ancient and Islamic Persia, he has also promoted the rapid westernization and modernization of Iran, including the establishment of a radio and television broadcasting system second only to that of Japan among the nations of Asia, a fact which is little known to Europeans or Americans. The purpose of this study was to amass and present a comprehensive body of knowledge concerning the development of broadcasting in Iran, as well as a review of current operations and plans for future development. A short survey of the political and spiritual history of pre-Islamic and Islamic Persia and a general survey of mass communication in Persia and Iran, especially from the Il iv advent of the telegraph is presented, so that the development of broadcasting might be seen in proper perspective and be more fully appreciated.
    [Show full text]
  • See the Document
    IN THE NAME OF GOD IRAN NAMA RAILWAY TOURISM GUIDE OF IRAN List of Content Preamble ....................................................................... 6 History ............................................................................. 7 Tehran Station ................................................................ 8 Tehran - Mashhad Route .............................................. 12 IRAN NRAILWAYAMA TOURISM GUIDE OF IRAN Tehran - Jolfa Route ..................................................... 32 Collection and Edition: Public Relations (RAI) Tourism Content Collection: Abdollah Abbaszadeh Design and Graphics: Reza Hozzar Moghaddam Photos: Siamak Iman Pour, Benyamin Tehran - Bandarabbas Route 48 Khodadadi, Hatef Homaei, Saeed Mahmoodi Aznaveh, javad Najaf ...................................... Alizadeh, Caspian Makak, Ocean Zakarian, Davood Vakilzadeh, Arash Simaei, Abbas Jafari, Mohammadreza Baharnaz, Homayoun Amir yeganeh, Kianush Jafari Producer: Public Relations (RAI) Tehran - Goragn Route 64 Translation: Seyed Ebrahim Fazli Zenooz - ................................................ International Affairs Bureau (RAI) Address: Public Relations, Central Building of Railways, Africa Blvd., Argentina Sq., Tehran- Iran. www.rai.ir Tehran - Shiraz Route................................................... 80 First Edition January 2016 All rights reserved. Tehran - Khorramshahr Route .................................... 96 Tehran - Kerman Route .............................................114 Islamic Republic of Iran The Railways
    [Show full text]
  • Novel Hydraulic Structures and Water Management in Iran: a Historical Perspective
    Novel hydraulic structures and water management in Iran: A historical perspective Shahram Khora Sanizadeh Department of Water Resources Research, Water Research Institute������, Iran Summary. Iran is located in an arid, semi-arid region. Due to the unfavorable distribution of surface water, to fulfill water demands and fluctuation of yearly seasonal streams, Iranian people have tried to provide a better condition for utilization of water as a vital matter. This paper intends to acquaint the readers with some of the famous Iranian historical water monuments. Keywords. Historic – Water – Monuments – Iran – Qanat – Ab anbar – Dam. Structures hydrauliques et gestion de l’eau en Iran : une perspective historique Résumé. L’Iran est situé dans une région aride, semi-aride. La répartition défavorable des eaux de surface a conduit la population iranienne à créer de meilleures conditions d’utilisation d’une ressource aussi vitale que l’eau pour faire face à la demande et aux fluctuations des débits saisonniers annuels. Ce travail vise à faire connaître certains des monuments hydrauliques historiques parmi les plus fameux de l’Iran. Mots-clés. Historique – Eau – Monuments – Iran – Qanat – Ab anbar – Barrage. I - Introduction Iran is located in an arid, semi-arid region. Due to the unfavorable distribution of surface water, to fulfill water demands and fluctuation of yearly seasonal streams, Iranian people have tried to provide a better condition for utilization of water as a vital matter. Iran is located in the south of Asia between 44º 02´ and 63º 20´ eastern longitude and 25º 03´ to 39º 46´ northern latitude. The country covers an area of about 1.648 million km2.
    [Show full text]
  • World Working Group on Storks, Ibises and Spoonbills
    World Working Group on Storks, Ibises and Spoonbills Jaribu Stork, Venezuela (photo: C. Luthin) International Council for Bird Preservation Vogelpark Walsrode Produced by: D-3030 Walsrode W. W. Brehm Fund for International Bird Conservation Fed. Rep. Germany In but several years, the communication network of the World RESEARCH AND CONSERVATION Working Group on Storks, Ibises, and Spoonbills has grown considerably, and a very large volume of information on this PRIORITIES: group of birds is beginning to surface. Over 120 individuals STORKS, ffiiSES, & SPOONBILLS from over 40 countries have contributed to this report. (A list of participants of the Working Group and their addresses is forthcoming.) In this, the second annual report of the Working AMERICAS Group, two types of summaries are presented: SPECIES STA­ TUS REPORTS and REGIONAL REPORTS. Unfortunately, 1. Determine status of JABIRU in all of Central America, and not all species and but several regions can be included in this establish critical habitat needs. Promote strict protection of report due to space and time limitations; those remaining shall all nest sites and frequently-used wetlands. be included in the next issue, however. There is a strong bias to­ wards tropical America and South and East Asia, for there 2. Monitor coastal breeding ciconiiforms in Central America exists less published material than what is available on and northern South America, including AMERICAN European/African species. Also, the greatest number of un­ WOOD STORK, ROSEATE SPOONBILL, WHITE IBIS, known and endangered species occur in these countries, and SCARLET IBIS, and protect significant wetlands which they are given priority by the Working Group.
    [Show full text]
  • Review of Rare Birds in Iran, 1860S–1960S
    Podoces, 2009, 4(1): 1–27 Review of Rare Birds in Iran, 1860s–1960s CEES S. ROSELAAR 1* & MANSOUR ALIABADIAN 2 1. Zoological Museum & Institute of Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics, University of Amsterdam PO Box 94766, 1090 GT Amsterdam, THE NETHERLANDS 2. Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, IRAN * Correspondence Author. Email: [email protected] Received 27 March 2009; accepted 7 October 2009 Abstract: Based on original literature reports covering the period 1860 –1969, details of 362 records of 102 bird species considered rare in Iran are presented. This fills a gap in knowledge of Iran’s birds from a period between research by Gmelin and Hablizl in the 1770s (reviewed by Mlikovsky 2008) and an overview of the observations of rare birds in Iran in the 1960s and 1970s (presented by Scott 2008). Attention is drawn to two new species for Iran (Eastern Marsh Harrier Circus spilonotus and Blue Whistling Thrush Myophonus caeruleus ). Published details validate the records of Light-bellied Brent Goose Branta hrota , Upland Buzzard Buteo hemilasius , Great Knot Calidris tenuirostris , and Oriental Cuckoo Cuculus saturatus , formerly considered as of dubious occurrence in Iran. Information on six species (Yellow-breasted Tit Cyanistes cyanus flavipectus , Falcated Duck Anas falcata , Indian Nightjar Caprimulgus asiaticus , Güldenstädt’s Redstart Phoenicurus erythrogaster , Cirl Bunting Emberiza cirlus and Eurasian Nutcracker Nucifraga caryocatactes) was considered insufficient or unreliable and the occurrence of these species in Iran has been rejected. We recommend that these species be omitted from the last revised checklist of the birds of Iran (Scott & Adhami 2006).
    [Show full text]
  • The Conservation of Iranian Wetlands Project
    The Conservation of Iranian Wetlands Project Foreword Working with numerous governmental and non-governmental institutions, and funded by the Global Environment Facility and the United Nations Development Programme, the Conservation of Iranian Wetlands project has helped create a model of integrated ecological management to preserve some of Iran’s most precious environmental resources. Initially based on the three pilot sites of Lake Urumieh Basin, Lake Parishan and Shadegan wetland, the multi-stakeholder management plan devised for these wetlands is to be rolled out to another 50 wetlands across the country. Begun in 2005, the project is now in its eighth and final year. It has succeeded in leveraging important governmental and civil society involvement for the management of wetlands, and mobilized over 2 trillion Iranian Rials (IRR) in national budget allocations for ecosystem management. Beyond its considerable institutional achievements at national, provincial and local levels, the project has supported some highly productive micro-initiatives in villages and communities surrounding wetlands to ease pressure on water resources. These include sustainable farming activities and village-led efforts for species conservation. It is through these initiatives that the wetlands project has successfully broadened the participation of women in community affairs and developed the capacity of locally- based non-governmental organizations to be part of the wetlands management process. In addition, the project has helped establish water rights due to Lake Urumieh by its surrounding provinces. Over the course of its eight years, the project has created solid institutional bases and secured significant political and financial commitments from the Iranian government to ensure that its achievements will be consolidated even after the project’s close at the end of 2012.
    [Show full text]