DOCSLIB.ORG

Table of Contents

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Table of Contents FIFTH EDITION National Academy of Inventors, 3702 Spectrum Boulevard, Suite 165, Tampa, FL 33612-9445 USA www.academyonventors.org TABLE OF CONTENTS About the NAI Fellows Program ...............................................................2 Letter from the U.S. Commissioner for Patents ......................................3 Induction Ceremony Speakers ..................................................................4 2016 NAI Fellows Bios ..........................................................................5-48 NAI Fellows Selection Committee ....................................................49-53 In Memoriam .............................................................................................54 Complete List of All 757 NAI Fellows ..............................................55-61 Common Abbreviations ...........................................................................63 Photo: Denis Tangney, Jr. | Cover Photo: Jerry Hopman ABOUT THE NAI FELLOWS PROGRAM Election to NAI Fellow status is the highest professional distinction accorded solely to academic inventors who have demonstrated a prolific spirit of innovation in creating or facilitating outstanding inventions that have made a tangible impact on quality of life, economic development, and the welfare of society. Academic inventors and innovators elected to the rank of NAI Fellow are nominated by their peers for outstanding contributions to innovation in areas such as patents and licensing, innovative discovery and technology, significant impact on society, and support and enhancement of innovation. The nomination packets are reviewed by the NAI Fellows Selection Committee. The number of Fellows elected each year is dependent on the quality of the nominations submitted. Committee members may not vote on a nominee from their institution. Decisions of the Selection Committee are final. If a nominee is not elected to Fellow status, he or she will remain on record for committee review for three consecutive years. HOW TO NOMINATE FOR NAI FELLOWSHIP Nominees must be: • a named inventor on a patent(s) issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. The median for current Fellows is 20 patents. • affiliated with a university, non-profit research institute, governmental agency or other academic entity. The following information must be included with the online submission form: • Nominee’s CV • A full list of nominee’s U.S. patents • Letter of nomination Nominations open July 1 – October 1 annually Submit nominations online at: www.AcademyofInventors.com/Fellows.asp ABOUT OUR FELLOWS The NAI Fellows Program has 757 Fellows worldwide representing nearly 230 prestigious universities and governmental and non-profit research institutions. Collectively, the Fellows hold more than 26,000 issued U.S. patents. With the induction of the 2016 class, there are now 94 presidents and senior leaders of research universi- ties and non-profit research institutes, 382 members of the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine; 28 inductees of the National Inventors Hall of Fame, 45 recipients of the U.S. National Medal of Technology and Innovation and U.S. National Medal of Science, 28 Nobel Laureates, 216 AAAS Fellows, 126 IEEE Fellows, 102 AIMBE and 116 Fellows of the American Academy of Arts & Sciences, among other awards and distinctions. NAI Fellows’ inventions have resulted in over 8,500 licensed technologies, created more than 1.1 million jobs, and generated more than $100 billion in revenue. 2 | 2016 NAI Fellows United States Patent and Trademark Office Office of the Commissioner for Patents February 27, 2017 Dear Friends: On behalf of the United States Patent and Trademark Office, I congratulate the NAI's newly elected 2016 class of Fellows. The USPTO is privileged to participate in recognizing these 175 academic luminaries of innovation and invention, who have been bestowed this high professional distinction. I also want to congratulate the NAI, which continues to celebrate and honor the outstanding achievements of many of the top minds in academic research, both nationally and internationally. The USPTO recognizes the significant impact that NAI Fellows have made on our society and quality of life, and I am honored to serve on the Selection Committee for these distinguished individuals. The USPTO values collaboration with the NAI and the friendship which has developed through our shared mission to advance and protect innovation. Our work together, now and in the future, will continue to benefit the innovation community worldwide. Again, congratulations to the 2016 NAI Fellows. You are among the nation's top academic innovators and inventors and deserve much recognition for your outstanding achievements. Warmest regards, Andrew H. Hirshfeld Commissioner for Patents U.S. Patent and Trademark Office P.O. Box 1450, Alexandria, VA 22313-1450 • ww.uspto.gov 2016 NAI Fellows | 3 2016 FELLOWS CEREMONY SPEAKERS Welcome Remarks Paul R. Sanberg President, National Academy of Inventors Paul R. Sanberg, Ph.D., D.Sc., FNAI, is founder and president of the National Academy of Inventors, and senior vice president for research, innovation, and economic development at the University of South Florida. He trained at York University, University of British Columbia, Australian National University and Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, among others, and held academic positions at Ohio University, University of Cincinnati, and Brown University. He holds 43 U.S. and 110 foreign patents and has served on numerous scientific advisory boards for health-related foundations and companies. He is author of more than 600 scientific articles and 14 books, with over 27,000 citations to his work, co-editor-in-chief of Technology and Innovation, and serves on editorial boards for more than 30 scientific journals. He is a Charter Fellow of the NAI, and fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science and the American Institute for Medical and Biological Engineering, AAAS-Lemelson Invention Ambassador, Florida Inventors Hall of Fame inductee, Florida Academy of Sciences Medalist, and serves on the nomination eval- uation committee of the United States National Medal of Technology and Innovation. Introduction of the Keynote Speaker Randy E. Berridge Former President, Florida High Tech Corridor Council Randy E. Berridge held the position of president of the Florida High Tech Corridor Council since its inception in 1996. He recently announced his retirement but will continue to serve in a leadership and planning support role until June 30th. Berridge also serves as president of the Berridge Consulting Group, Inc. Previously he held management positions with AT&T includ- ing chair of its Central Florida Management Council, district manager of public relations for the Florida division and manager in the legal, HR and manufacturing divisions. Berridge cur- rently serves on the board of governors of the Florida Chamber of Commerce and chair of the 2017 Selection Committee for the Florida Inventors Hall of Fame. He is a past member of the Enterprise Florida Stakeholder Council, Florida Research Consortium, Foundation for Florida’s State Colleges and the National Center for Simulation. He is an Emeritus Board Member of the Astronauts Memorial Foundation. Keynote Speaker Andrew H. Hirshfeld Commissioner for Patents, United States Patent and Trademark Office U.S. Department of Commerce Andrew H. Hirshfeld, Esq., is commissioner for patents for the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). He was appointed to the position in July 2015. Hirshfeld leads and manages more than 10,000 employees as the patent organization’s chief operating officer, and manages and directs all aspects of patent operations, examination policy, patent quality management, interna- tional patent cooperation, resources and planning, and budget administration. In his previous role as deputy commissioner for patent examination policy, he served as an authority on pat- ent laws, rules, and examining practice and procedure, and provided oversight and direction for the Offices of Petitions, Patent Legal Administration, and the Manual of Patent Examining Procedure. Hirshfeld previously served as chief of staff to the Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the USPTO. He began his career at the USPTO in 1994 as a patent examiner, became a supervisory patent examiner in 2001, and was promoted to the Senior Executive Service in 2008 as a group director in Technology Center 2100, Computer Architecture and Software. Hirshfeld holds a bachelor’s degree from The University of Vermont, and a juris doctorate degree from Western New England College School of Law. Hirshfeld served as a mem- ber of the NAI Fellows Selection Committee. 4 | 2016 NAI Fellows FELLOWS | David Akopian The University of Texas at San Antonio David Akopian, Ph.D., is university professor of electrical and computer engineering at The University of Texas at San Antonio (UTSA). Akopian is an innovator in human-machine inter- action and guidance, including mobile applications, wireless sensing and location technologies. His first inventions were in the area of integration of GPS receivers and mobile devices. Akopian is the recipient of four inventor awards. He holds 25 U.S. and foreign patents and seven filed pat- ent applications, which were applied in Nokia products and UTSA testbed systems serving several federal and state projects. He has published nearly 200 articles, three book chapters,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Unrestricted Immigration and the Foreign Dominance Of
    Unrestricted Immigration and the Foreign Dominance of United States Nobel Prize Winners in Science: Irrefutable Data and Exemplary Family Narratives—Backup Data and Information Andrew A. Beveridge, Queens and Graduate Center CUNY and Social Explorer, Inc. Lynn Caporale, Strategic Scientific Advisor and Author The following slides were presented at the recent meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science. This project and paper is an outgrowth of that session, and will combine qualitative data on Nobel Prize Winners family histories along with analyses of the pattern of Nobel Winners. The first set of slides show some of the patterns so far found, and will be augmented for the formal paper. The second set of slides shows some examples of the Nobel families. The authors a developing a systematic data base of Nobel Winners (mainly US), their careers and their family histories. This turned out to be much more challenging than expected, since many winners do not emphasize their family origins in their own biographies or autobiographies or other commentary. Dr. Caporale has reached out to some laureates or their families to elicit that information. We plan to systematically compare the laureates to the population in the US at large, including immigrants and non‐immigrants at various periods. Outline of Presentation • A preliminary examination of the 609 Nobel Prize Winners, 291 of whom were at an American Institution when they received the Nobel in physics, chemistry or physiology and medicine • Will look at patterns of
    [Show full text]
  • Facebook Timeline
    Facebook Timeline 2003 October • Mark Zuckerberg releases Facemash, the predecessor to Facebook. It was described as a Harvard University version of Hot or Not. 2004 January • Zuckerberg begins writing Facebook. • Zuckerberg registers thefacebook.com domain. February • Zuckerberg launches Facebook on February 4. 650 Harvard students joined thefacebook.com in the first week of launch. March • Facebook expands to MIT, Boston University, Boston College, Northeastern University, Stanford University, Dartmouth College, Columbia University, and Yale University. April • Zuckerberg, Dustin Moskovitz, and Eduardo Saverin form Thefacebook.com LLC, a partnership. June • Facebook receives its first investment from PayPal co-founder Peter Thiel for US$500,000. • Facebook incorporates into a new company, and Napster co-founder Sean Parker becomes its president. • Facebook moves its base of operations to Palo Alto, California. N. Lee, Facebook Nation, DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4614-5308-6, 211 Ó Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013 212 Facebook Timeline August • To compete with growing campus-only service i2hub, Zuckerberg launches Wirehog. It is a precursor to Facebook Platform applications. September • ConnectU files a lawsuit against Zuckerberg and other Facebook founders, resulting in a $65 million settlement. October • Maurice Werdegar of WTI Partner provides Facebook a $300,000 three-year credit line. December • Facebook achieves its one millionth registered user. 2005 February • Maurice Werdegar of WTI Partner provides Facebook a second $300,000 credit line and a $25,000 equity investment. April • Venture capital firm Accel Partners invests $12.7 million into Facebook. Accel’s partner and President Jim Breyer also puts up $1 million of his own money.
    [Show full text]
  • Person of the Year" Covers for Time Magazine
    UNLV Theses, Dissertations, Professional Papers, and Capstones 12-1-2012 Where in the World are the Women of Time? Women and the "Person of the Year" Covers for Time Magazine Krystle Lynne Anttonelli University of Nevada, Las Vegas Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalscholarship.unlv.edu/thesesdissertations Part of the Gender, Race, Sexuality, and Ethnicity in Communication Commons, Mass Communication Commons, and the Women's Studies Commons Repository Citation Anttonelli, Krystle Lynne, "Where in the World are the Women of Time? Women and the "Person of the Year" Covers for Time Magazine" (2012). UNLV Theses, Dissertations, Professional Papers, and Capstones. 1704. http://dx.doi.org/10.34917/4332685 This Thesis is protected by copyright and/or related rights. It has been brought to you by Digital Scholarship@UNLV with permission from the rights-holder(s). You are free to use this Thesis in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s) directly, unless additional rights are indicated by a Creative Commons license in the record and/ or on the work itself. This Thesis has been accepted for inclusion in UNLV Theses, Dissertations, Professional Papers, and Capstones by an authorized administrator of Digital Scholarship@UNLV. For more information, please contact [email protected]. WHERE ARE THE WOMEN OF TIME? WOMEN AND THE “PERSON OF THE YEAR” COVERS FOR TIME MAGAZINE by Krystle Anttonelli Bachelor
    [Show full text]
  • Kirwan Update July/August 2010
    Kirwan Update July/August 2010 The Changing Face of Black America Executive Notes Charisma S. Acey number of reasons, including increasingly The immigration issue Assistant Professor of restrictive immigration policies among City and Regional Planning has exploded again with a joint appointment European countries. Moreover, changes into the national spot- at the Kirwan Institute to U.S. immigration policy have directly light with Arizona’s affected the rates of legal migration to the draconian law. Given Most of the increase in scholarship United States: The 1965 act eliminated the the issue’s complexity, on immigration following the 1965 quota system, and refugee policies in the I would like to touch Immigration and Naturalization Act has 1980s also facilitated immigration. The most on four key points. Professor john a. powell followed the dramatic rise in non-European dramatic jump in African immigrant popu- Rather than looking at immigrant diversity, but has been heavily lation was between 2000 and 2005, accord- the immigration issue focused on Latino, Asian, and European ing to the 2007 report by Mary Mederios in isolation, we should socioeconomic attainment and assimila- Kent, “Immigration and America’s Black recognize the effect of our current socio- tion. According to the last U.S. Census, Population,” when 40 percent of the current political situation as the country deals African immigrants to the United States African immigrant population arrived. with a deep recession in the Obama era. from the mid-20th century now num- How do Black Caribbean and Black African Secondly, we should consider the role of ber approximately one million persons, migration differ? Studies of Black Caribbean immigration in Anglo-American global- mostly from West, East, and North Africa, migration have found evidence of assimila- ization, which has become the received with smaller numbers from Southern and tion with Black America, in terms of resi- wisdom for elites.
    [Show full text]
  • Andrew Grove 3: Mastering Change
    Robert Heller’s Masterclasses Andrew Grove 3 Mastering Change Mastering change Anticipating and exploiting change is the key to success in the twenty-first century. You need to recognize the signs of change early and then develop a timely strategy to cope with it. You must also make sure you carry people with you in the transformation of the organization. PROFITING FROM PARANOIA Whether or not you agree with Andy Grove’s maxim “only the paranoid survive”, the thought is a powerful tool for effective management of change. Strictly speaking, paranoia is a delusion: but the existence of competitive and other threats, whatever your industry, is likely to be only too real. Take your guide from what is happening in the present and forget what has happened in the past in your business, which may be wholly irrelevant. Fight against the tendency to stick to the business and the methods that have sustained your fortunes for so long. AVOIDING DENIAL The opposite of healthy paranoia is unhealthy denial. Change that comes in the form of bad news tends to be denied. To avoid the denial trap, analyze your response honestly and rationally. DEALING WITH BAD NEWS – Do I want this news to be wrong? – Is that why I am denying it? – Or have I conducted a thorough, dispassionate analysis that shows it to be wrong? – Either way, what will be the worst possible result if the news is right and I have done nothing? – What action can and should I take if the news is right? – What is the worst possible result of that action? – What is the best possible result of that action? Rational evaluation of a possible threat as soon as it appears will undermine false optimism and demonstrate what risks you are running through denial and inaction.
    [Show full text]
  • Iron, Steel and Swords Script - Page 1 Johannes (Jan) Martinus Burgers
    Heroes of Dislocation Science Here are some notes about some of the (early) "Heroes" of Dislocation Science. It is a purely subjective collection and does not pretend to do justice to the history of the field or the people involved. I will not even remotely try to establish a "ranking", and that's why names appear in alphabetical order. To put things in perspective, let's start with a short history of the invention of the dislocation, followed by their actual discovery. Dislocations were invented long before they were discovered. They came into being in 1934 by hard thinking and not by observation. As ever so often, three people came up with the concept independently and pretty much at the same time. The three inventors were Egon Orowan, Michael Polanyi and Geoffrey Taylor. What they invented was the edge dislocation; the general concept of dislocations had to wait a little longer. Of course, they all knew a few things that gave them the right idea. They knew about atoms and crystals since X- ray diffraction was already in place since 1912. They also knew that plastic deformation occurred by slip on special lattice planes if some shear stress was large enough, and they knew that the stress needed for slip was Advanced far lower than what one would need if complete planes would be slipping on top of each other. They were also aware of the work of others. Guys with big names then and still today, like T. v. Kármán, Jakow Iljitsch Frenkel, or Ludwig Prandtl, had put considerable effort into theories dealing, in modern parlor, with the collective movements of atoms in crystals.
    [Show full text]
  • Buddhism from Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia Jump To: Navigation, Search
    Buddhism From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to: navigation, search A statue of Gautama Buddha in Bodhgaya, India. Bodhgaya is traditionally considered the place of his awakening[1] Part of a series on Buddhism Outline · Portal History Timeline · Councils Gautama Buddha Disciples Later Buddhists Dharma or Concepts Four Noble Truths Dependent Origination Impermanence Suffering · Middle Way Non-self · Emptiness Five Aggregates Karma · Rebirth Samsara · Cosmology Practices Three Jewels Precepts · Perfections Meditation · Wisdom Noble Eightfold Path Wings to Awakening Monasticism · Laity Nirvāṇa Four Stages · Arhat Buddha · Bodhisattva Schools · Canons Theravāda · Pali Mahāyāna · Chinese Vajrayāna · Tibetan Countries and Regions Related topics Comparative studies Cultural elements Criticism v • d • e Buddhism (Pali/Sanskrit: बौद धमर Buddh Dharma) is a religion and philosophy encompassing a variety of traditions, beliefs and practices, largely based on teachings attributed to Siddhartha Gautama, commonly known as the Buddha (Pāli/Sanskrit "the awakened one"). The Buddha lived and taught in the northeastern Indian subcontinent some time between the 6th and 4th centuries BCE.[2] He is recognized by adherents as an awakened teacher who shared his insights to help sentient beings end suffering (or dukkha), achieve nirvana, and escape what is seen as a cycle of suffering and rebirth. Two major branches of Buddhism are recognized: Theravada ("The School of the Elders") and Mahayana ("The Great Vehicle"). Theravada—the oldest surviving branch—has a widespread following in Sri Lanka and Southeast Asia, and Mahayana is found throughout East Asia and includes the traditions of Pure Land, Zen, Nichiren Buddhism, Tibetan Buddhism, Shingon, Tendai and Shinnyo-en. In some classifications Vajrayana, a subcategory of Mahayana, is recognized as a third branch.
    [Show full text]
  • University of California Is One of the World’S Leading Academic He University of California Is One of the World’S Institutions
    UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA CAL STUDENT POPULATION Fall 2001 No. of Students ....... 32,128 Undergraduates .... 23,269 Graduate Students . 8,859 Gender Distribution Male ..................... 15,690 Female .................. 16,438 STUDENT COMPOSITION Fall 2001 A multi-cultural and multi- ethnic campus. No ethnic group forms a majority. Native American ........... 178 Asian/Asian American 10,786 African American ...... 1,131 Hispanic .................... 2,666 Caucasian ................. 11,489 Other ............................. 556 International .............. 2,627 he University of California is one of the world’s leading academic The undergraduate student body No Ethnic Data .......... 2,695 institutions. The school, known throughout the world as “Cal,” can best be characterized by its Tis truly a prototype of a contemporary university. It attracts what diversity; there is no one racial or ethnic majority. Students reflect all age many consider the finest applicant pool in the country, generates an groups, and economic, cultural and geographic backgrounds. This dynamic ethnically and culturally diverse student population on campus, and mix produces the wide range of opinion and perspective essential to a great provides one of the finest learning experiences in the world today. university. WORLD-CLASS FACULTY THE BAY AREA AND STUDENTS Overlooking San Francisco Bay, the campus is a lush and tranquil 1,232-acre oasis in an urban setting. The grounds have retained much of The Berkeley campus is renowned for the size and quality of its libraries and laboratories, the scope of its research and publications, and the distinction of its faculty and students. National rankings consistently place Cal’s undergraduate and graduate programs among the very best. The faculty includes eight Nobel Laureates, 122 members of the National Academy of Sciences, 19 MacArthur Fellows, 81 Fulbright Scholars, three Pulitzer Prize winners and more Guggenheim Fellows (137) than any other university in the country.
    [Show full text]
  • Class of 1944 Class of 1945 Class of 1946 Class of 1947 Class of 1948
    2016-2017 Honor Roll of Donors (June 1, 2016 to May 31, 2017) Alumni Donors are listed by class year, followed by Friends of UIW, and Corporations and Foundations. Class of 1944 Magdalene Flannery† Nancy Ann Wilson† Class of 1945 Sr. Margaret Rose Palmer, CCVI Class of 1946 Ellen Frances Crenan Class of 1947 Hazel M. Coughran Ruth Aimee Martin Ottenweller Class of 1948 Nell Mueller Kothmann Mary Helen Mueller Betty Scott Rabalais Class of 1950 Sara Elizabeth Dyer† Gladys Henke Niemann Mary Caldeira Wade Class of 1952 Helen Loraine Bloomfield M. Maxine Buhler Burns Gladys C. Kallus Dolores M. Mitchell Mary Small Nichols Theresa Ann Zaldivar Class of 1953 Patricia J. Bartosh Katherine Cazamias Catsifas Dorothy P. Ferrell Mildred Jean Klecka Hovenden Patricia A. Nelson Crane Class of 1954 Lily Lee Chinn Mary C. Flores Ann Rita Foelker Graham Yolanda Cavazos Hall Rose Lorelle Hoffman Jacobs Teresa Clem Nicholson Class of 1955 Mary Elizabeth Boening Margaret Barrera Davis Carmen Frances Vivas McNease Capt. Bettye G. Nagy, USN (Ret.) Maria Nora Olivarez Margaret A. Schubert Bundren Helen Miles Shelton Julane Dugger Smith Class of 1956 Margaret Wright Clint Vivian Wood Donahoe Juliette Insaustegui Barbara Cattan Klauer Margaret E. Kloza Pellek Joyce E. Wright Nikolai Peggy Marie Penshorn Dixie Dianne Smith Emma C. Torralva Mary A. Pesek Tymrak Class of 1957 Mary Heck Aschenbrener Rose Mary Lozano Boldt Betty Jean Moos Ferrero Maria Luisa Lopez Glenn Mary "Petesie" Lee Peggy Schott Nickel Dr. Anita Kay Ochsner Class of 1958 Adriana Barrera Naomi Herrera Bourgeois Dorothy Maxine Cadena Marjory A. Fodor Imelda T.
    [Show full text]
  • Spring 2019 Spring Plus: AFP Risk Survey of the 2019 Results New Ctps New
    Treasury and Finance Treasury Spring 2019 ExchangeAssociation for Financial Professionals’ Quarterly Magazine Enhanced LEARNING Treasury and Finance Professionals AFP Exchange Leverage New Skills and Tools Better Business and Sales Forecasting Applying Cost and Capital APIs and Connectivity New CTPs Plus: Results of the 2019 AFP Risk Survey Spring 2019 We’ll focus on the day-to-day so you can focus on the days to come Prioritizing your organization’s key strategic objectives can be challenging while managing its daily banking activities. That’s why trusted partners are critical. Rely on MUFG, one of the largest global inancial groups, to support your organization’s treasury, trust, and trade inance needs. Backed by a 360-year history and a commitment to innovation and long-term client relationships, we can help optimize your working capital and provide best-in-class asset servicing solutions. Let us focus on the details so you can focus on the vision. Your trust, your future, our commitment Learn more at mufgamericas.com/partner MUFG Union Bank, N.A. A member of MUFG, a global inancial group ©2019 Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc. All rights reserved. The MUFG logo and name is a service mark of Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc., and is used by MUFG Union Bank, N.A., with permission. Member FDIC. SPRING 2019 CONTENTS VOLUME 39 NUMBER 1 26 37 51 AFP Research Financial Planning & Analysis Blockchain Results of the 2019 AFP Improving data analysis skills New blockchain applications for We’ll focus on the day-to-day Risk Survey Dr. Bill Hu, FP&A, CTP corporate treasury AFP Research Department Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Building the Second Mind, 1961-1980: from the Ascendancy of ARPA to the Advent of Commercial Expert Systems Copyright 2013 Rebecca E
    Building the Second Mind, 1961-1980: From the Ascendancy of ARPA to the Advent of Commercial Expert Systems copyright 2013 Rebecca E. Skinner ISBN 978 09894543-4-6 Forward Part I. Introduction Preface Chapter 1. Introduction: The Status Quo of AI in 1961 Part II. Twin Bolts of Lightning Chapter 2. The Integrated Circuit Chapter 3. The Advanced Research Projects Agency and the Foundation of the IPTO Chapter 4. Hardware, Systems and Applications in the 1960s Part II. The Belle Epoque of the 1960s Chapter 5. MIT: Work in AI in the Early and Mid-1960s Chapter 6. CMU: From the General Problem Solver to the Physical Symbol System and Production Systems Chapter 7. Stanford University and SRI Part III. The Challenges of 1970 Chapter 8. The Mansfield Amendment, “The Heilmeier Era”, and the Crisis in Research Funding Chapter 9. The AI Culture Wars: the War Inside AI and Academia Chapter 10. The AI Culture Wars: Popular Culture Part IV. Big Ideas and Hardware Improvements in the 1970s invert these and put the hardware chapter first Chapter 11. AI at MIT in the 1970s: The Semantic Fallout of NLR and Vision Chapter 12. Hardware, Software, and Applications in the 1970s Chapter 13. Big Ideas in the 1970s Chapter 14. Conclusion: the Status Quo in 1980 Chapter 15. Acknowledgements Bibliography Endnotes Forward to the Beta Edition This book continues the story initiated in Building the Second Mind: 1956 and the Origins of Artificial Intelligence Computing. Building the Second Mind, 1961-1980: From the Establishment of ARPA to the Advent of Commercial Expert Systems continues this story, through to the fortunate phase of the second decade of AI computing.
    [Show full text]
  • Coalition of Urban Serving Universities (USU) 2021 Annual Report 1 Year in Highlights
    Annual Report August 2021 BY THE NUMBERS located across . The Coalition of Urban 39 25 Serving Universities States Universities Enrolling a total of (USU) is a president-led network of 39 1,110,622 public urban research Students universities, located across 25 states, working to drive 44% 54% 19% impact at their institutions Pell Recipients Students of Color Adult Learners and the communities they *Asian, Black, Hispanic/Lantinx, and 2 + (>25) serve. Coalition of Urban Serving Universities (USU) 2021 Annual Report 1 Year In Highlights USU has raised $14,175,705 in multi-year grant funding from seven funding agencies supporting seven current initiatives. • Funders: American Association of Community Colleges (through the support of Ascendium/ECMC), Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Lumina Foundation, Executive Department of Education, Raikes Foundation, Kresge Foundation, and Michael and Summary Susan Dell Foundation • Initiatives:21st Century Workforce, Advancing Racial Justice and Equity, Collaborative Opportunity Grant, Completion Grants, Equity Transfer Initiative, Frontier Set, Despite the challenges of the Partnerships for Adult Learner Success, and Student Experience Project COVID-19 pandemic, The Coalition • Reach: We have worked with more than 29 institutions (74% of our current of Urban Serving Universities (USU) membership) on our six grant-funded initiatives over the last year. has experienced an impactful Drawing on the experience of students, faculty, and public university administrators at five public urban universities during the pandemic, USU released the Food Insecurity at Urban Universities: year. Our projects continued, we Perspectives During the Pandemic examining the magnitude of the pandemic’s impact on food organized consistent presidents/ insecurity on college students and outlining steps institutions can take to better address food insecurity.
    [Show full text]