Integrative Paleobotany: Affirming the Role of Fossils in Modern Plant Biology—Introduction and Dedication

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Integrative Paleobotany: Affirming the Role of Fossils in Modern Plant Biology—Introduction and Dedication Int. J. Plant Sci. 180(6):459–463. 2019. SPECIAL ISSUE—ROTHWELL CELEBRATION q 2019 by The University of Chicago. All rights reserved. 1058-5893/2019/18006-0001$15.00 DOI: 10.1086/704242 INTEGRATIVE PALEOBOTANY: AFFIRMING THE ROLE OF FOSSILS IN MODERN PLANT BIOLOGY—INTRODUCTION AND DEDICATION Ignacio H. Escapa,* Alexandru M.F. Tomescu,1,† Michael T. Dunn,‡ and Ruth A. Stockey§ *Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas, Museo Paleontológico Egidio Feruglio, Trelew, Chubut 9100, Argentina; †Department of Biological Sciences, Humboldt State University, Arcata, California 95521, USA; ‡Department of Agriculture, Biology, and Health Sciences, Cameron University, Lawton, Oklahoma 73505, USA; and §Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon 97331, USA Gar Rothwell was named Distinguished Professor at Ohio University in 2004. Photo courtesy of Fred C. Tom of Lamborn’s Studio, Athens, Ohio. If you are interested in plant evolution, try this quick exercise: have evolved as a result of a long process in which failed attempts take a phylogenetic tree of the plant kingdom, close your eyes, are the rule, and as a result, the diversity of extinct forms accu- and point your finger randomly to a node of the phylogeny. Irre- mulated in the fossil record far exceeds that recorded in the ex- spective of the clade to which you are pointing, there is one thing tant flora. From this simple concept, Gar W. Rothwell made his you should know about it: the living representatives of that clade career. Because of that, here is a second thing you should know about the plant clade to which you pointed at random: Gar has, 1 Author for correspondence; email: [email protected]. more likely than not, contributed information about evolution 459 This content downloaded from 201.250.027.037 on June 07, 2020 15:47:03 PM All use subject to University of Chicago Press Terms and Conditions (http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/t-and-c). 460 INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PLANT SCIENCES in that clade at some point in his career. Gar was one of the prin- karyotes, fungi, liverworts, mosses, lycopsids, sphenopsids, ferns cipal contributors to the revival of paleobotany from a largely of a wide variety of lineages, pteridosperms, conifers and conif- descriptive discipline to a vibrant field of investigation at the erophytes, cycads, ginkgophytes, bennettitaleans, and angio- forefront of modern evolutionary sciences that contributes cru- sperms—nothing has escaped Gar’s inquisitive eye. These de- cial insights into plant evolution, equal in importance to those scriptions of fossil taxa, which led to the development of several provided by genetics and molecular biology. Because of this, now-classic whole-plant concepts, have always represented for the impact of Gar’s scientific contributions reaches far beyond Gar only the first step in understanding broader and deeper pro- the field of paleobotany, with important implications for wide cesses in plant evolution and development. Gar has also used areas of plant biology, including anatomy and morphology, de- these fossils to develop innovative ideas and approaches for doc- velopment, systematics, phylogeny, and evolution. umenting the natural history of species long extinct and to in- Gar earned a master’s degree in the laboratory of Thomas N. form some of the most vexing unanswered questions in plant Taylor (University of Illinois at Chicago, 1966) studying Paleo- evolution and phylogeny. Over the past few decades, no scientist zoic seeds in the genus Conostoma (Rothwell and Eggert 1970; has been more influential in affirming and expanding the poten- Rothwell 1971a). He subsequently earned his PhD degree in the tial of paleobotany as an integral contributor to evolutionary laboratory of Wilson N. Stewart (University of Alberta, 1973), plant biology than Gar. In terms of organismal biology and nat- where he reconstructed the plants in the seed fern genus Calli- ural history, in landmark studies Gar documented several as- stophyton (Rothwell 1972b, 1975, 1980, 1981). His work was pects of reproductive biology of the early seed plants, including instrumental in ushering in studies of fossil plants as whole liv- the hydrasperman reproductive syndrome (Rothwell 1971a, ingorganisms,lookingatbothstructureanddevelopment.These 1971b, 1986; Rothwell and Scheckler 1988; Serbet and Roth- early experiences launched Gar on a career in plant evolution- well 1995), pollination drops (Rothwell 1977) and pollen tubes ary biology that stretched over a half century, during which he (Rothwell 1972a) of Carboniferous seed ferns (pteridosperms), occupied positions at the University of Alberta, University of and seed dormancy in Paleozoic conifers (Mapes et al. 1989). London–Chelsea College, Ohio University, and Oregon State Together with collaborators, Gar described what is still the old- University. Throughout his career, Gar’s scholarly work and est seed plant reconstructed as a whole plant, the pteridosperm contributions have been recognized by numerous awards and Elkinsia (Rothwell et al. 1989; Rothwell and Serbet 1992; Ser- honors: theIsabel Cookson Award, the EdgarT. WherryAward, bet and Rothwell 1992). His studies of the apical organization the Michael A. Cichan Award, the Merit Award of the Botani- of lepidodendralean rooting structures (rhizomorphs; Rothwell cal Society of America, and honorary membership in the Inter- 1984; Rothwell and Pryor 1991), the lepidodendralean embryo national Organization of Palaeobotany, where he served for anatomy (Stubblefield and Rothwell 1981; Pigg and Rothwell 12 years as secretary-treasurer and president. 1983b), and the body plan of the Chaloneriaceae (Pigg and Gar is the author, with Wilson Stewart, of one of the most Rothwell 1979, 1983a) led to a paradigm shift in our under- impactful and widely used textbooks in the field of paleobotany standing of the structure and evolution of the body plan of iso- and plant evolution—Paleobotany and the Evolution of Plants. etalean lycopsids (Rothwell and Erwin 1985). Gar’s continued Published in 1993, this textbook explains in direct and engaging exploration of coal ball floras put on firm footing the idea that prose the crucial role of fossils, and of their anatomy and mor- the rise and the first major radiation of leptosporangiate ferns phology, in understanding the origin and evolution of all major occurred in the Carboniferous (Rothwell 1978, 1987a, 1996, plant groups. For more than a quarter century it has provided 1999; Trivett and Rothwell 1988; Rothwell and Good 2000; inspiration to numerous paleobotanists and structural botanists Tomescu et al. 2006; Rothwell and Stockey 2008). His studies worldwide. spanningseveraldecadesalsopainstakinglydocumentedtheevo- The results of the research program that Gar has led are re- lution of conifer reproductive structures, from the early conifers flected in the more than 250 peer-reviewed journal articles and of the Paleozoic (Rothwell 1982; Mapes and Rothwell 1984, book chapters published in more than 30 scientific journals that 1991, 1998; Rothwell et al. 1997, 2005, 2007; Hernandez- cover the fields of botany and paleobotany (e.g., International Castillo et al. 2001, 2009; Rothwell and Mapes 2001) to the Journal of Plant Sciences, American Journal of Botany, and Re- origins of modern conifer families (Falder et al. 1998; Ratzel view of Palaeobotany and Palynology) and the broader area of et al. 2001; Klymiuk et al. 2011; Rothwell et al. 2011, 2012; the natural sciences (e.g., Science and Nature). However, Gar’s Serbet et al. 2013; Atkinson et al. 2014a, 2014b; Rothwell and influence in the field of plant biology cannot be reduced to a num- Ohana 2016). In studies of broader scope, Gar surveyed the di- ber of publications—it is best reflected in the quality, relevance, versity of fossil and extant plants, contributing novel perspec- and impact of these contributions, which combine a classic per- tives on the evolution of sporophyte body plans and branching spective derived from detailed anatomical and morphological patterns across the entire embryophyte clade (Rothwell 1995; descriptions of fossil species with innovative methodologies and Tomescu et al. 2014) and on the diversity and evolution of stelar approaches. Gar conducted most of these studies in collabora- architecture across the tracheophyte clade (Rothwell 1976; Beck tion with his students and other fellow paleobotanists and plant et al. 1982). biologists. The inclusion of fossil plants in phylogenetic analyses ranks Gar is a time traveler: the species he has described belong to a among Gar’s most important contributions to evolutionary bi- time slice that spans more than 400 million years. His studies ology. Extinct species exhibiting novel combinations of charac- have investigated plants and other organisms from the Paleozoic ters refashion our understanding of evolutionary relationships to the present and have addressed an incredibly large number of and are key to studies of deep phylogeny. Gar’s work has been lineages, many of them described as new species, genera, fami- at the forefront of the integration of fossils in studies of system- lies, and even classes. He has made detailed descriptions of pro- atics and phylogeny. He was one of the pioneering paleobota- This content downloaded from 201.250.027.037 on June 07, 2020 15:47:03 PM All use subject to University of Chicago Press Terms and Conditions (http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/t-and-c). ESCAPA ET AL.—INTEGRATIVE PALEOBOTANY 461 nists to empirically address
Recommended publications
  • Fossils and Plant Phylogeny1
    American Journal of Botany 91(10): 1683±1699. 2004. FOSSILS AND PLANT PHYLOGENY1 PETER R. CRANE,2,5 PATRICK HERENDEEN,3 AND ELSE MARIE FRIIS4 2Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, Surrey TW9 3AB, UK; 3Department of Biological Sciences, The George Washington University, Washington DC 20052 USA; 4Department of Palaeobotany, Swedish Museum of Natural History, Box 50007, S-104 05 Stockholm, Sweden Developing a detailed estimate of plant phylogeny is the key ®rst step toward a more sophisticated and particularized understanding of plant evolution. At many levels in the hierarchy of plant life, it will be impossible to develop an adequate understanding of plant phylogeny without taking into account the additional diversity provided by fossil plants. This is especially the case for relatively deep divergences among extant lineages that have a long evolutionary history and in which much of the relevant diversity has been lost by extinction. In such circumstances, attempts to integrate data and interpretations from extant and fossil plants stand the best chance of success. For this to be possible, what will be required is meticulous and thorough descriptions of fossil material, thoughtful and rigorous analysis of characters, and careful comparison of extant and fossil taxa, as a basis for determining their systematic relationships. Key words: angiosperms; fossils; paleobotany; phylogeny; spermatophytes; tracheophytes. Most biological processes, such as reproduction or growth distic context, neither fossils nor their stratigraphic position and development, can only be studied directly or manipulated have any special role in inferring phylogeny, and although experimentally using living organisms. Nevertheless, much of more complex models have been developed (see Fisher, 1994; what we have inferred about the large-scale processes of plant Huelsenbeck, 1994), these have not been widely adopted.
    [Show full text]
  • International Organisation of Palaeobotany IOP NEWSLETTER
    INTERNATIONAL UNION OF BIOLOGIC A L S C IENC ES S ECTION FOR P A L A EOBOTANY International Organisation of Palaeobotany IOP NEWSLETTER 110 August 2016 CONTENTS FROM THE SECRETARY/TREASURER IPC XIV/IOPC X 2016 IOPC 2020 IOP MEMBERSHIP IOP EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE ELECTIONS IOP WEBMASTER POSITION WHAT HAPPENED TO THE OUPH COLLECTIONS? THE PALAEOBOTANY OF ITALY UPCOMING MEETINGS CALL FOR NEWS and NOTES The views expressed in the newsletter are those of its correspondents, and do not necessarily reflect the policy of IOP. Please send us your contributions for the next edition of our newsletter (June 2016) by M ay 30th, 2016. President: Johanna Eder-Kovar (G ermany) Vice Presidents: Bob Spicer (Great Britain), Harufumi Nishida (Japan), M ihai Popa (Romania) M embers at Large: Jun W ang (China), Hans Kerp (Germany), Alexej Herman (Russia) Secretary/Treasurer/Newsletter editor: M ike Dunn (USA) Conference/Congress Chair: Francisco de Assis Ribeiro dos Santos IOP Logo: The evolution of plant architecture (© by A. R. Hemsley) I OP 110 2 August 2016 FROM THE In addition, please send any issues that you think need to be addressed at the Business SECRETARY/TREASURER meeting. I will add those to the Agenda. Dear IOP Members, Respectfully, Mike I am happy to report, that IOP seems to be on track and ready for a new Executive Council to take over. The elections are IPC XIV/IOPC X 2016 progressing nicely and I will report the results in the September/October Newsletter. The one area that is still problematic is the webmaster position. We really to talk amongst ourselves, and find someone who is willing and able to do the job.
    [Show full text]
  • (Voltziales) from the Triassic of Antarctica
    Int. J. Plant Sci. 174(3):425–444. 2013. Ó 2013 by The University of Chicago. All rights reserved. 1058-5893/2013/17403-0014$15.00 DOI: 10.1086/668686 WHOLE-PLANT CONCEPT AND ENVIRONMENT RECONSTRUCTION OF A TELEMACHUS CONIFER (VOLTZIALES) FROM THE TRIASSIC OF ANTARCTICA Benjamin Bomfleur,1,* Anne-Laure Decombeix,y Ignacio H. Escapa,z Andrew B. Schwendemann,* and Brian Axsmith§ *Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas 66045, U.S.A., and Natural History Museum and Biodiversity Institute, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas 66045, U.S.A.; yUniversite´ Montpellier 2, Unite´ Mixte de Recherche Botanique et Bioinformatique de l’Architecture des Plantes (UMR AMAP), Montpellier, F-34000, France, and Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, UMR AMAP, Montpellier, F-34000, France; zConsejo Nacional de Investigaciones Cientı´ficas y Te´cnicas—Museo Paleontologico Egidio Feruglio, Trelew, Chubut 9100, Argentina; and §Department of Biological Sciences, LSCB 124, University of South Alabama, Mobile, Alabama 36688, U.S.A. We present a whole-plant concept for a genus of voltzialean conifers on the basis of compression/impression and permineralized material from the Triassic of Antarctica. The reconstruction of the individual organs is based on a combination of organic connections, structural correspondences, similarities in cuticles and epidermal morphologies, co-occurrence data, and ex situ palynology. The affiliated genera of organs include trunks, branches, and roots (Notophytum); strap-shaped leaves with parallel venation (Heidiphyllum compressions and permineralized Notophytum leaves); seed cones (Telemachus and Parasciadopitys); pollen cones (Switzianthus); and bisaccate pollen of Alisporites type. Structural similarities lead us to suggest that Parasciadopitys is the permineralized state of a Telemachus cone and should be treated as a junior synonym.
    [Show full text]
  • The Possible Pollen Cone of the Late Triassic Conifer Heidiphyllum/Telemachus (Voltziales) from Antarctica
    KU ScholarWorks | http://kuscholarworks.ku.edu Please share your stories about how Open Access to this article benefits you. The Possible Pollen Cone of the Late Triassic Conifer Heidiphyllum/ Telemachus (Voltziales) From Antarctica by Benjamin Bomfleur, Rudolph Serbet, Edith L. Taylor, and Thomas N. Taylor 2011 This is the published version of the article, made available with the permission of the publisher. The original published version can be found at the link below. Bomfleur, B., Serbet, R., Taylor, E., and Taylor, N. 2011. The Possible Pollen Cone of the Late Triassic Conifer Heidiphyllum/Telemachus (Voltziales) From Antarctica. Antarctic Science 23(4): 379-385. Published version: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0954102011000241 Terms of Use: http://www2.ku.edu/~scholar/docs/license.shtml This work has been made available by the University of Kansas Libraries’ Office of Scholarly Communication and Copyright. Antarctic Science 23(4), 379–385 (2011) & Antarctic Science Ltd 2011 doi:10.1017/S0954102011000241 The possible pollen cone of the Late Triassic conifer Heidiphyllum/Telemachus (Voltziales) from Antarctica BENJAMIN BOMFLEUR, RUDOLPH SERBET, EDITH L. TAYLOR and THOMAS N. TAYLOR Division of Paleobotany at the Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, and Natural History Museum and Biodiversity Institute, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS 66045, USA bbomfl[email protected] Abstract: Fossil leaves of the Voltziales, an ancestral group of conifers, rank among the most common plant fossils in the Triassic of Gondwana. Even though the foliage taxon Heidiphyllum has been known for more than 150 years, our knowledge of the reproductive organs of these conifers still remains very incomplete. Seed cones assigned to Telemachus have become increasingly well understood in recent decades, but the pollen cones belonging to these Mesozoic conifers are rare.
    [Show full text]
  • Bibliography of Isoetes
    BIBLIOGRAPHY OF ISOETES ALLEN, B.M. 1975. A note on the distribution of Isoetes in the Cadiz Province, Spain. Fern Gaz. (U.K.) 11 (2-3): 163-164 (1975). ALONSO, PAZ, E. 1989. Notas sobre plantas nuevas o interesantes para la flora Uruguaya: 1. (Notes on new or interesting plants for the Uruguayan flora: 1.) Comun. Bot. Mus. Hist. Nat. Montevideo 5 (91): 1-4 (1989) - Isoetes pp.2-3 ALSTON, A.H.G. 1982. Isoetaceae: 1. In Steenis, C.G.G.J. van, Holttum, R. E., eds. Flora Malesiana, series 2. Pteridophytes, volume 1. The Hague, Martinus Nijhoff, Dr. W. Junk Publ. 62-64 (1982)- illus., chrom. nos., key. ANDREIS, C., RODONDI, G. 1987. Alcune stazioni di Isoetes echinospora Dur. nel Bresciano e osservazioni al SEM delle spore delle Isoetes della flora Italica. Natura Bresciana no.23: 119-130 (1986 publ. 1987) - illus., maps. 4, ANTHONY, N.C., & E.A. SCHELPE, 1985. Two new taxa and a new combination in southern African Pteridophyta. Bothalia, 15 (3 & 4): 554-555 (1985) ARREGUIN-SANCHEZ, M., 1986. Nuevos registros y taxa interesantes de pteridofitas del Valle de Mexico. (Isoetaceae, Psilotaceae y Selaginellaceae) Phytologia 59 (7): 451-453 (1986) ASH, S., & K.B. PIGG. 1991. A new Jurassic Isoetites (Isoetales) from the Wallowa Terrane in Hells Canyon Oregon and Idaho. Amer. J. Bot. 78: 1636-1642. BAJPAI, U., & H.K. MAHESHWARI,1985. EM studies on the megaspores of Isoetes coromandelina. Phytomorphology, 34 (1-4): 226-231 (1984 publ. 1985) - illus. BALDWIN, W.K.W. 1933. The organization of the young sporophyte of Isoetes engelmanni, A.
    [Show full text]
  • Seed Plant Phylogeny: Demise of the Anthophyte Hypothesis? Michael J
    bb10c06.qxd 02/29/2000 04:18 Page R106 R106 Dispatch Seed plant phylogeny: Demise of the anthophyte hypothesis? Michael J. Donoghue* and James A. Doyle† Recent molecular phylogenetic studies indicate, The first suggestions that Gnetales are related to surprisingly, that Gnetales are related to conifers, or angiosperms were based on several obvious morphological even derived from them, and that no other extant seed similarities — vessels in the wood, net-veined leaves in plants are closely related to angiosperms. Are these Gnetum, and reproductive organs made up of simple, results believable? Is this a clash between molecules unisexual, flower-like structures, which some considered and morphology? evolutionary precursors of the flowers of wind-pollinated Amentiferae, but others viewed as being reduced from Addresses: *Harvard University Herbaria, 22 Divinity Avenue, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138, USA. †Section of Evolution and more complex flowers in the common ancestor of Ecology, University of California, Davis, California 95616, USA. angiosperms, Gnetales and Mesozoic Bennettitales [1]. E-mail: [email protected] These ideas went into eclipse with evidence that simple [email protected] flowers really are a derived, rather than primitive, feature Current Biology 2000, 10:R106–R109 of the Amentiferae, and that vessels arose independently in angiosperms and Gnetales. Vessels in angiosperms 0960-9822/00/$ – see front matter seem derived from tracheids with scalariform pits, whereas © 2000 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved. in Gnetales they resemble tracheids with circular bor- dered pits, as in conifers. Gnetales are also like conifers in These are exciting times for those interested in plant lacking scalariform pitting in the primary xylem, and in evolution.
    [Show full text]
  • System Klasyfikacji Organizmów
    1 SYSTEM KLASYFIKACJI ORGANIZMÓW Nie ma dziś ogólnie przyjętego systemu klasyfikacji organizmów. Nie udaje się osiągnąć zgodności nie tylko w odniesieniu do zakresów i rang poszczególnych taksonów, ale nawet co do zasad metodologicznych, na których klasyfikacja powinna być oparta. Zespołowe dzieła przeglądowe z reguły prezentują odmienne i wzajemnie sprzeczne podejścia poszczególnych autorów, bez nadziei na consensus. Nie ma więc mowy o skompilowaniu jednolitego schematu klasyfikacji z literatury i system przedstawiony poniżej nie daje nadziei na zaakceptowanie przez kogokolwiek poza kompilatorem. Przygotowany został w oparciu o kilka zasad (skądinąd bardzo kontrowersyjnych): (1) Identyfikowanie ga- tunków i ich klasyfikowanie w jednostki rodzajowe, rodzinowe czy rzędy jest zadaniem specjalistów i bez szcze- gółowych samodzielnych studiów nie można kwestionować wyników takich badań. (2) Podział świata żywego na królestwa, typy, gromady i rzędy jest natomiast domeną ewolucjonistów i dydaktyków. Powody, które posłużyły do wydzielenia jednostek powinny być jasno przedstawialne i zrozumiałe również dla niespecjalistów, albowiem (3) podstawowym zadaniem systematyki jest ułatwianie laikom i początkującym badaczom poruszanie się w obezwładniającej złożoności świata żywego. Wątpliwe jednak, by wystarczyło to do stworzenia zadowalającej klasyfikacji. W takiej sytuacji można jedynie przypomnieć, że lepszy ułomny system, niż żaden. Królestwo PROKARYOTA Chatton, 1938 DNA wyłącznie w postaci kolistej (genoforów), transkrypcja nie rozdzielona przestrzennie od translacji – rybosomy w tym samym przedzia- le komórki, co DNA. Oddział CYANOPHYTA Smith, 1938 (Myxophyta Cohn, 1875, Cyanobacteria Stanier, 1973) Stosunkowo duże komórki, dwuwarstwowa błona (Gram-ujemne), wewnętrzna warstwa mureinowa. Klasa CYANOPHYCEAE Sachs, 1874 Rząd Stigonematales Geitler, 1925; zigen – dziś Chlorofil a na pojedynczych tylakoidach. Nitkowate, rozgałęziające się, cytoplazmatyczne połączenia mię- Rząd Chroococcales Wettstein, 1924; 2,1 Ga – dziś dzy komórkami, miewają heterocysty.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecological Sorting of Vascular Plant Classes During the Paleozoic Evolutionary Radiation
    i1 Ecological Sorting of Vascular Plant Classes During the Paleozoic Evolutionary Radiation William A. DiMichele, William E. Stein, and Richard M. Bateman DiMichele, W.A., Stein, W.E., and Bateman, R.M. 2001. Ecological sorting of vascular plant classes during the Paleozoic evolutionary radiation. In: W.D. Allmon and D.J. Bottjer, eds. Evolutionary Paleoecology: The Ecological Context of Macroevolutionary Change. Columbia University Press, New York. pp. 285-335 THE DISTINCTIVE BODY PLANS of vascular plants (lycopsids, ferns, sphenopsids, seed plants), corresponding roughly to traditional Linnean classes, originated in a radiation that began in the late Middle Devonian and ended in the Early Carboniferous. This relatively brief radiation followed a long period in the Silurian and Early Devonian during wrhich morphological complexity accrued slowly and preceded evolutionary diversifications con- fined within major body-plan themes during the Carboniferous. During the Middle Devonian-Early Carboniferous morphological radiation, the major class-level clades also became differentiated ecologically: Lycopsids were cen- tered in wetlands, seed plants in terra firma environments, sphenopsids in aggradational habitats, and ferns in disturbed environments. The strong con- gruence of phylogenetic pattern, morphological differentiation, and clade- level ecological distributions characterizes plant ecological and evolutionary dynamics throughout much of the late Paleozoic. In this study, we explore the phylogenetic relationships and realized ecomorphospace of reconstructed whole plants (or composite whole plants), representing each of the major body-plan clades, and examine the degree of overlap of these patterns with each other and with patterns of environmental distribution. We conclude that 285 286 EVOLUTIONARY PALEOECOLOGY ecological incumbency was a major factor circumscribing and channeling the course of early diversification events: events that profoundly affected the structure and composition of modern plant communities.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Supplementary Materials and Methods 1 S1 Expanded
    1 Supplementary Materials and Methods 2 S1 Expanded Geologic and Paleogeographic Information 3 The carbonate nodules from Montañez et al., (2007) utilized in this study were collected from well-developed and 4 drained paleosols from: 1) the Eastern Shelf of the Midland Basin (N.C. Texas), 2) Paradox Basin (S.E. Utah), 3) Pedregosa 5 Basin (S.C. New Mexico), 4) Anadarko Basin (S.C. Oklahoma), and 5) the Grand Canyon Embayment (N.C. Arizona) (Fig. 6 1a; Richey et al., (2020)). The plant cuticle fossils come from localities in: 1) N.C. Texas (Lower Pease River [LPR], Lake 7 Kemp Dam [LKD], Parkey’s Oil Patch [POP], and Mitchell Creek [MC]; all representing localities that also provided 8 carbonate nodules or plant organic matter [POM] for Montañez et al., (2007), 2) N.C. New Mexico (Kinney Brick Quarry 9 [KB]), 3) S.E. Kansas (Hamilton Quarry [HQ]), 4) S.E. Illinois (Lake Sara Limestone [LSL]), and 5) S.W. Indiana (sub- 10 Minshall [SM]) (Fig. 1a, S2–4; Richey et al., (2020)). These localities span a wide portion of the western equatorial portion 11 of Euramerica during the latest Pennsylvanian through middle Permian (Fig. 1b). 12 13 S2 Biostratigraphic Correlations and Age Model 14 N.C. Texas stratigraphy and the position of pedogenic carbonate samples from Montañez et al., (2007) and cuticle were 15 inferred from N.C. Texas conodont biostratigraphy and its relation to Permian global conodont biostratigraphy (Tabor and 16 Montañez, 2004; Wardlaw, 2005; Henderson, 2018). The specific correlations used are (C. Henderson, personal 17 communication, August 2019): (1) The Stockwether Limestone Member of the Pueblo Formation contains Idiognathodus 18 isolatus, indicating that the Carboniferous-Permian boundary (298.9 Ma) and base of the Asselian resides in the Stockwether 19 Limestone (Wardlaw, 2005).
    [Show full text]
  • Fundamentals of Palaeobotany Fundamentals of Palaeobotany
    Fundamentals of Palaeobotany Fundamentals of Palaeobotany cuGU .叮 v FimditLU'φL-EjAA ρummmm 吋 eαymGfr 伊拉ddd仇側向iep M d、 況 O C O W Illustrations by the author uc削 ∞叩N Nn凹創 刊,叫MH h 咀 可 白 a aEE-- EEA First published in 1987 by Chapman αndHallLtd 11 New Fetter Lane, London EC4P 4EE Published in the USA by Chα~pman and H all 29 West 35th Street: New Yo地 NY 10001 。 1987 S. V. M秒len Softcover reprint of the hardcover 1st edition 1987 ISBN-13: 978-94-010-7916-7 e-ISBN-13: 978-94-009-3151-0 DO1: 10.1007/978-94-009-3151-0 All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reprinted, or reproduced or utilized in any form or by any electronic, mechanical or other means, now known or hereafter invented, including photocopying and recording, or in any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data Mey凹, Sergei V. Fundamentals of palaeobotany. 1. Palaeobotany I. Title 11. Osnovy paleobotaniki. English 561 QE905 Library 01 Congress Catα loging in Publication Data Mey凹, Sergei Viktorovich. Fundamentals of palaeobotany. Bibliography: p. Includes index. 1. Paleobotany. I. Title. QE904.AIM45 561 8ι13000 Contents Foreword page xi Introduction xvii Acknowledgements xx Abbreviations xxi 1. Preservation 抄'pes αnd techniques of study of fossil plants 1 2. Principles of typology and of nomenclature of fossil plants 5 Parataxa and eutaxa S Taxa and characters 8 Peculiarity of the taxonomy and nomenclature of fossil plants 11 The binary (dual) system of fossil plants 12 The reasons for the inflation of generic na,mes 13 The species problem in palaeobotany lS The polytypic concept of the species 17 Assemblage-genera and assemblage-species 17 The cladistic methods 18 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Ancient Noeggerathialean Reveals the Seed Plant Sister Group Diversified Alongside the Primary Seed Plant Radiation
    Ancient noeggerathialean reveals the seed plant sister group diversified alongside the primary seed plant radiation Jun Wanga,b,c,1, Jason Hiltond,e, Hermann W. Pfefferkornf, Shijun Wangg, Yi Zhangh, Jiri Beki, Josef Pšenickaˇ j, Leyla J. Seyfullahk, and David Dilcherl,m,1 aState Key Laboratory of Palaeobiology and Stratigraphy, Nanjing Institute of Geology and Palaeontology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing 210008, China; bCenter for Excellence in Life and Paleoenvironment, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing 210008, China; cUniversity of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shijingshan District, Beijing 100049, China; dSchool of Geography, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2TT, United Kingdom; eBirmingham Institute of Forest Research, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2TT, United Kingdom; fDepartment of Earth and Environmental Science, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104-6316; gState Key Laboratory of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany, Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xiangshan, Beijing 100093, China; hCollege of Paleontology, Shenyang Normal University, Key Laboratory for Evolution of Past Life in Northeast Asia, Ministry of Natural Resources, Shenyang 110034, China; iDepartment of Palaeobiology and Palaeoecology, Institute of Geology v.v.i., Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, 165 00 Praha 6, Czech Republic; jCentre of Palaeobiodiversity, West Bohemian Museum in Plzen, 301 36 Plzen, Czech Republic; kDepartment of Paleontology, Geozentrum, University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria; lIndiana Geological and Water Survey, Bloomington, IN 47404; and mDepartment of Geology and Atmospheric Science, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405 Contributed by David Dilcher, September 10, 2020 (sent for review July 2, 2020; reviewed by Melanie Devore and Gregory J.
    [Show full text]
  • Syllabus M.Sc. Botany (Choice Based Credit System)
    Syllabus M.Sc. Botany (Choice Based Credit System) (To be implemented from the Academic Year 2017-18) DEPARTMENT OF BOTANY UNIVERSITY OF ALLAHABAD Page 1 of 21 DEPARTMENT OF BOTANY UNIVERSITY OF ALLAHABAD M.Sc. Syllabus (Choice Based Credit System) (To be implemented from the Academic Year 2017-18) Semester – I Course Code Marks Course Title Credits BOT501 100 Phycology and Limnology 3 BOT502 100 Mycology and Plant Pathology 3 BOT503 100 Bryology and Pteridology 3 BOT504 100 Gymnosperm and Palaeobotany 3 BOT531 100 Lab Work I (based on Course BOT501 and BOT502) 4 (Excursion/field work/ Project) BOT532 100 Lab Work II (based on Course BOT503 and BOT504) 4 (Excursion/field work/Project) Total credits 20 Semester – II Course Code Marks Course Title Credits BOT505 100 Plant Morphology and Anatomy 3 BOT506 100 Reproductive Biology, Morphogenesis and Tissue culture 3 BOT507 100 Taxonomy of Angiosperm and Economic Botany 3 BOT508 100 Ecology and Phytogeography 3 BOT533 100 Lab Work III (based on Course BOT505 and BOT506) 4 (Field work/ Project) BOT534 100 Lab Work IV (based on Course BOT507 and BOT508) 4 (Field work/ Project) Total credits 20 Semester – III Course Code Marks Course Title Credits BOT601 100 Plant Physiology 3 BOT602 100 Plant Biochemistry and Biochemical Techniques 3 BOT603 100 Cytogenetics, Plant Breeding and Biostatistics 3 BOT604 100 Microbiology 3 BOT631 100 Lab Work V (based on Course BOT601 and BOT602) 4 BOT632 100 Lab Work VI (based on Course BOT603 and BOT604) 4 Total credits 20 Semester – IV Course Code Marks Course
    [Show full text]