A Stranger's Utterance: Hilda Morley's Poetics of Self-Definition
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
A STRANGER'S UTTERANCE: HILDA MORLEY'S POETICS OF SELF-DEFINITION Matilde Mª Martín González Universidad de La Laguna American poet Hilda Morley (1919) has been recognized lately as one of the most suggestive writers associated with Black Mountain poetics. Highly admired by Denise Levertov and Robert Creeley, her poetic production, which has appeared widely since 1972, is being reassessed and revalorized by both critics and readers. In this essay I shall be concerned with delineating Morley's mode of conveying an uncertain and unstable sense of identity. While feminist scholars are currently addressing this very theme, Morley's poems articulate in a somewhat diffused manner her own conflictive relationship with the idea of subjectivity and how it may be poetically expressed. In the wake of her conception of poetry as an organic event, Morley problematizes in her texts a contingent notion of the Self which links language and identity inextricably but inconclusively. In the late 1960s Denise Levertov was supposed to introduce a book of Hilda Morley's called The Bird with the Long Neck that remained, however, unpublished. She included a slightly revised version of that introduction in her book Light Up the Cave (1981), which became the first essay focusing on the art of this relatively unknown but gifted woman poet1. In those introductory remarks, Levertov refers to Morley's unpublished poems as "each a perfect and separate pleasure" (1981: 265) and highlights the parallelisms between herself and Morley in terms of age, 1.Hilda Morley was born in New York (1919), and was educated there and in Haifa (Palestine), London, and at Wellesley College. In 1948 she met the composer Stefan Wolpe and soon after their marriage in 1952 they joined the faculty of Black Mountain. Her husband died in 1972 after a ten-year battle with Parkinson's disease. She died in London on March 23, 1998 at the age of seventy-nine. She received the Capricorn Prize for To Hold in My Hand: Selected Poems (1983). Her other collections of verse include the chapbook A Blessing Outside Us (1976), What Are Winds and What Are Waters (1983), Cloudless at First (1988) and The Turning (1998). Her poems have appeared in literary magazines such as Chicago Review, Harper's Magazine, APR, The Nation, Hudson Review, New Directions Annual, Poetry, Ironwood and Sulfur. However, her poetic output has received very little critical attention, despite having been highly praised by fellow poets such as Denise Levertov and Robert Creeley and by critics such as Stanley Kunitz. In fact she has been largely overlooked in the studies of Black Mountain poetics and ignored in women's poetry anthologies such as Florence Howe's 1993 No More Masks! or even in the popular Norton Anthology of Literature by Women. At any rate, her poetry is slowly but firmly beginning to attract critical attention; Paul Hoover, for instance, includes her in his 1994 Postmodern American Poetry anthology. ATLANTIS Vol. XXIV Núm. 2 (Diciembre 2002): 133-146. ISSN 0210-6124 134 Matilde Mª Martín González education and a life devoted to thinking about and writing poetry. She deplores, nonetheless, the fact that Morley's poems came to be published very late, for her first volume came out in 1976, making little or no impression on either critics or readers. Levertov places Morley in the tradition of Ezra Pound, William Carlos Williams, H.D., Charles Olson, Robert Duncan and Robert Creeley, in so far as the precision of structure and the nuances of rhythm, sound and diction make her poems truly organic pieces. In a later essay Denise Levertov made reference in passing to Morley's art when citing examples of women poets whose writing did not adhere to the "neurotically, excessively, self-indulgently [women's] poetry preoccupied with death or suicide" (1981: 267) so much in vogue during the seventies. Foremost among the qualities of Morley's style Levertov considers her "subtle sensibility" and a "rock-firm craft" (1981: 268). Similarly, in the preface to Morley's second book, What Are Winds and What Are Waters (1983), she eulogizes her poetry on the grounds that it manifests "the real meaning of the often-abused concept of 'composition by field'" (1983), thus assigning a place for Morley in the tradition of organicist poetry and implying that her work needs critical reevaluation. Morley's life experiences achieve supreme relevance when one attempts to account for the absence of her poetry in printed form until the late seventies. Additionally, it would be necessary to reassess the role played by her husband (German-born avant-garde composer Stefan Wolpe) in Morley's publishing career. During their stay at Black Mountain College in the 50s and in subsequent years, her poetry remained unpublished: her texts did not appear either in Origin or in Black Mountain Review, the emblematic magazines of the Black Mountain group. Donald Allen did not include her poems in the famous anthology of new American poetry he edited in 1960. I do not believe the reason for this silence, voluntary or not, is to be attributed solely to Morley's feeling, in Stanley Kunitz's words, "that there was room for only one genius in the family, and that one had to be her husband" (1983). That only partially explains why she had her first book published twenty years after she had actually begun writing. A different perspective emerges when one analyses the male attitude toward female art prevalent in Black Mountain, at least during Olson's rectorship from 1951 to 1956, precisely the period of Morley's stay. Brian Conniff has pointed out that the central role traditionally ascribed to Olson has precluded the critical consideration due to other writers. Specifically he believes that "to restore some of Black Mountain's kinetic energy ... it is helpful ... to try to establish some kind of legitimate poetic distance from Olson's writing and from that work of Duncan and Creeley most often associated with him" (1993: 119). Reconsidering the poetry of Hilda Morley is, I believe, an indispensable move in that direction. It is significant that Creeley himself, in the preface to Morley's 1998 book The Turning, readily pays tribute to her patience with "the male machismo of the college, which gave such small room if any to a poet like [herself]" (1998). He adds that the men in the college, "tramping about with our big ideas" felt probably "threatened" by this woman's talents (1998). In no way is this assessment by Creeley intended merely as a friendly gesture toward Morley but as a conscious validation of her work despite the ostracism she faced in that male-dominated milieu. While it is not my intention to resort to facile reasons to explain why Hilda Morley's work received such delayed ATLANTIS XXIV.2 (2002) A Stranger’s Utterance: Hilda Morley’s Poetics of Self-Definition 135 publication, it is nevertheless quite obvious that gender played a central role in Black Mountain College, as Creeley's remarks suggest. In her work The Arts at Black Mountain College Emma Harris documents evidence of the hostile sexual politics of Black Mountain and remarks that Hilda Morley felt unappreciated due to her poetic interests as much as to her gender. She, in turn, came to understand the attitude of the faculty wives as a rather submissive one. Indeed, in her poem "For Constance Olson", dedicated to the poet's first wife, Morley records Constance's "movement/ of a Kore still/ (Charles celebrated/ it)" and her "thoughtfulness/ always of a maiden bringing/ offerings on a Greek vase,/ these & the assenting/ voice — spirals of pensiveness" (1983b: 40). Lines such as these reveal Morley's subtle critique of both the men's and the women's assumption of gendered values at Black Mountain college and although there is not the slightest trace of feminist vindictiveness in the text I do believe the tone of the commentary is overtly critical. And yet Hilda Morley can hardly be considered a feminist. After so many years, the experience at Black Mountain provoked in her only a "spark of anguish" which "blasts the remembered images to ashes" at the same time that "the heat of her body shelters them" and yields a language of re-connection, "thread onto thread" (1983b: 40). In "For Robert Duncan", written on the occasion of the poet's death, Morley begins to problematize that initial gendered exclusion which she saw embodied in Duncan's person, who "didn't look at me/ but always/ past me, not wishing/ to talk to me, but moving/ toward someone else & preferably/ a man" (1998: 52). She makes clear, however, that Duncan's homosexuality didn't prevent her feeling compensated by his immensely suggestive poetry, for the poems really "broke out of the mist ... a vast embrace" between them (1998: 52). Robert Creeley, her lifelong friend, was perhaps the only exception as far as the male treatment of women in Black Mountain is concerned. In a poem dedicated to Creeley, whom she calls a "wandering minstrel", Morley foregrounds the different attitude of this poet toward her and highlights his "extreme courtesy/ so little/ seen in that particular place" (1998: 98). At any rate, whether or not Morley was indeed influenced by the biased stance of the main male figures of Black Mountain, it remains beyond dispute that readers were deprived of her poetry for a long time. In an effort to explain her peculiar publishing career, Stanley Kunitz describes Morley as "unaggressive about her work", implying that she preferred to keep the poems out of the public eye, with the purpose of providing a resting period that would do them much good.