DOCSLIB.ORG

Rulings of Senate Speakers 1994 – 2005

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Rulings of Senate Speakers 1994 – 2005 Rulings of Senate Speakers 1994 – 2005 November 2008 Prepared by the Chamber Operations and Procedure Office Introduction According to section 34 of the Constitution Act, 1867, the Speaker of the Senate is appointed by the Governor General and shall serve as Speaker until another Senator is appointed. The Speaker is vested with certain authority for the purpose of assisting the Senate in managing its agenda during a sitting day. When points of order or questions of privilege are raised, either to seek clarification in relation to a proceeding or to bring to the attention of the Senate an occurrence which may have breached a parliamentary privilege or demeaned the dignity of the Senate, Senators can present the Speaker with their assessment of the particular situation. Having heard sufficient arguments, the Speaker will consider their merits and render a decision. Rules and practices obliged the Speaker to give reasons to explain the decision. The ruling of the Speaker, however, is not necessarily final. If a Senator wishes to challenge the Speaker, the Senate must vote to sustain the ruling. This collection of rulings from 1994-2005 covers the decisions that were made by three Speakers: the Honourable Senators Roméo LeBlanc, Gildas Molgat and Daniel Hays. Paul C. Bélisle Clerk of the Senate and Clerk of the Parliaments Table of Contents November 2008 First Session, Thirty-Fifth Parliament January 17, 1994 – February 2, 1996 .......................................................................................... 1 Question of privilege – Right of Senate to claim attendance and service of its members.......... 3 Inclusion of dissenting opinions in reprint of Special Joint Committee report .......................... 5 Motion – Acceptability (that the motion be not now adopted but referred to a committee) ...... 8 Bill – Admissibility (C-79)......................................................................................................... 9 Motion – Acceptability (motion in amendment) ...................................................................... 11 Motion – Acceptability (referring subject-matter of bill to committee and postponing 2nd reading until committee reports) ......................................................................................... 11 Motion – Acceptability (allowing standing committee to work with House of Commons committee) ................................................................................................................................ 13 Motion – Acceptability (Message from House of Commons).................................................. 14 Bill – Admissibility (C-69)....................................................................................................... 15 Divisions – Request for deferred divisions............................................................................... 16 Motion – Acceptability (constituting a special committee)...................................................... 16 Question of Privilege – Statements contained in newspaper article......................................... 20 Question of Privilege – Power of Speaker to adjudicate on competence of Senate to pass legislation.................................................................................................................................. 21 Bill – Admissibility (S-11) ....................................................................................................... 23 Motion – Acceptability (instructing committee to report by a certain date) ................................ 24 Motion – Acceptability (change of date) .................................................................................... 26 Second Session, Thirty-Fifth Parliament February 27, 1996 – April 27 1997 ............................................................................................ 29 Question of Privilege – Correspondence written to Members of Parliament by federal inmate at penitentiary ................................................................................................... 31 Bill – Admissibility (C-28) (Ruling appealed and sustained)................................................... 32 Written questions – Effect of prorogation on unanswered questions ....................................... 34 Bill – Admissibility (C-28) (Ruling appealed and sustained)................................................... 36 Bill – Admissibility (C-28)....................................................................................................... 38 Question Period (recognition of Senators)................................................................................ 39 Motion – Acceptability (government motion to allocate time) ................................................ 40 Committee Report – Acceptability (Ruling appealed and sustained)....................................... 41 Motion – Acceptability (amendment referring report back to committee)............................... 44 Bill – Admissibility (C-42)....................................................................................................... 44 Miscellaneous – Whether Speaker had said “adopté, carried” ................................................. 46 Orders of the Day (disposition of items) .................................................................................. 46 Motion – Acceptability (amendment to a motion to refer a bill to a committee)..................... 47 Bill – Admissibility (S-12) ....................................................................................................... 48 Bill – Consideration of committee report prior to examination of interim report of committee (Ruling appealed and sustained)......................................................................... 51 Motions – Notice (Right of Acting Deputy Leader of Government to give Government Notice of Motion) ................................................................................................ 53 Motions – Acceptability (government motion to allocate time)............................................... 54 Bill – Admissibility (S-16) ....................................................................................................... 55 First Session, Thirty-Sixth Parliament September 22, 1997 – September 18, 1999................................................................................ 57 Adjournment of debate – Decision of Senate to refuse ............................................................ 59 Motion – Acceptability (motion in amendment) ...................................................................... 59 Bill – Admissibility (C-16)....................................................................................................... 59 Motion – Right of Speaker to decide the acceptability of a motion in amendment without point of order being raised........................................................................................... 60 Motion – Acceptability (motion in amendment) ...................................................................... 61 Motion – Acceptability of government notice of motion respecting time allocation............... 62 Bill – Amendment to a reasoned amendment........................................................................... 63 Emergency debate – Request (Ruling appealed and sustained) ............................................... 63 Routine of Business – Right to raise a point of order during ................................................... 64 Emergency debate – Request.................................................................................................... 65 Committees – Acceptability of report regarding Sen. Thompson ............................................ 65 Question of Privilege – Circulation of information concerning new tax rates prior to passage of enacting legislation (C-2)........................................................................................ 67 Bill – Admissibility (S-13) ....................................................................................................... 70 ii Question of Privilege – Circulation of petitions soliciting public support for the abolition of the Senate .............................................................................................................. 74 Orders of the Day – Government’s authority to determine priority of reports of committees............................................................................................................................ 75 Motion – Acceptability (motion in amendment) ...................................................................... 76 Bills – Committee Reports - Acceptability of an amendment.................................................. 77 Motion – Acceptability (“same question” rule)........................................................................ 80 Bill – Withdrawing (S-15) ........................................................................................................ 82 Question of Privilege – References to Minister of Canadian Heritage in Hustler magazine ... 82 Bill – Admissibility (S-26) ....................................................................................................... 85 Motion – Acceptability (endorsing a report of the House of Commons of which the Senate has no direct knowledge) .............................................................................................. 86 Bill – Preparing amendments in both languages - references
Load more

Recommended publications
  • THE LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY of MANITOBA 2: 30 O•Clock Thursday, March 11Th, 1965 Opening Prayer by Madam Speaker
    489 THE LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY OF MANITOBA 2: 30 o•clock Thursday, March 11th, 1965 Opening Prayer by Madam Speaker. MADAM SPEAKER: Presenting Petitions Reading and Receiving Petitions Presenting Reports by Standing and Special Committees The adjourned debate on the proposed motion of the Honourable the Attorney-General. The Honourable the Member for Rhineland. MR. J. M. FROESE (Rhineland): Madam Speaker, I adjourned debate yesterday on this motion in order to get a chance to look at the report that is in Votes and Proceedings of which we have a copy today, As you know, I was not a member of the committee that drew up the lists and therefore I had no knowledge as to what committees I would be put on. I have now looked at the list of the various committees and I would kindly request that my name be added to the Privileges and Elections Committee and to the Statutory Regulations and Orders Committee. MADAM SPEAKER: All those in favour please say aye. MR. FROESE: Madam Speaker, I would like an answer on this question. HON. STEW ART E. McLEAN (Attorney-General) (Dauphin): Madam Speaker, this is a matter which poses a difficult problem. I think that it would not be advisable to accede to the request made by the Honourable the Member for Rhineland. I would point out to him that as a Member of the Legislature he is entitled to attend any of the meetings of the committees of the House, to participate in the debates, although not to vote, if he is not a member of the committee.
    [Show full text]
  • Parliament of Canada / Parlement Du Canada
    PARLIAMENT OF CANADA / PARLEMENT DU CANADA The Dominion of Canada was created under the provisions of an Act of the Imperial Parliament (30 Victoria, Chapter III) passed in 1867, and formally cited as The British North America Act, 1867. This Act received Royal Assent, March 29th, 1867, and came into effect by virtue of Royal Proclamation, July 1st, 1867. The Constitution Act, 1867, provides: “There shall be one Parliament for Canada, consisting of the Queen, an Upper House styled the Senate, and the House of Commons.” (Clause 17) “There shall be a Session of the Parliament of Canada once at least in every year, so that twelve months shall not intervene between the last Sitting of the Parliament in one Session and its first Sitting in the next Session.” (Section 20) “Every House of Commons shall continue for five years from the Day of the Return of the Writs for choosing the House (subject to be sooner dissolved by the Governor General), and no longer.” (Section 50) “The Governor-General shall, from time to time, in the Queen's name, by instrument under the Great Seal of Canada, summon and call together the House of Commons.” (Section 38) “Either the English or the French language may be used by any person in the Debates of the House of the Parliament of Canada and of the House of the Legislation of Quebec, and both these languages are used in the respective records and Journals of those Houses; and either of those languages may be used by any person or in any Pleading or Process or in issuing from any Court of Canada established under the Constitution Act and in or from all or any of the Courts of Quebec.” (Section 133) “91.
    [Show full text]
  • Debates of the Senate
    CANADA Debates of the Senate 2nd SESSION . 40th PARLIAMENT . VOLUME 146 . NUMBER 22 OFFICIAL REPORT (HANSARD) Thursday, March 26, 2009 ^ THE HONOURABLE NOËL A. KINSELLA SPEAKER CONTENTS (Daily index of proceedings appears at back of this issue). Debates Service: D'Arcy McPherson, Chambers Building, Room 943, Tel. 613-995-5756 Publications Centre: David Reeves, Chambers Building, Room 969, Tel. 613-947-0609 Published by the Senate Available from PWGSC ± Publishing and Depository Services, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0S5. Also available on the Internet: http://www.parl.gc.ca 500 THE SENATE Thursday, March 26, 2009 The Senate met at 1:30 p.m., the Speaker in the chair. [Translation] Prayers. I know how devoted Paul is to the Senate and how proud he is of this institution. SENATORS' STATEMENTS [English] MR. PAUL C. BÉLISLE I ask honourable senators to join me in showing our appreciation to Mr. Bélisle on completing 15 years of service as CLERK OF THE SENATE AND CLERK Clerk of the Senate and Clerk of the Parliaments and to wish him OF THE PARLIAMENTS well as he continues to lead the Senate administration. Hon. George J. Furey: Honourable senators, I rise today to pay tribute to our Clerk, Mr. Paul Bélisle, who, 15 years ago, took on Hon. Senators: Hear, hear! the many challenges that come with the position of Clerk of the Senate and Clerk of the Parliaments. It has been quite a career for . (1340) a young man who first came to the Senate as a page in 1971. In fact, Paul is one of the longest-serving employees of the Senate Hon.
    [Show full text]
  • Mexico-Canada WEB.Pdf
    1 2 MÉXICO Y CANADÁ 3 44 AÑOS DE DIÁLOGO PARLAMENTARIO CONTENIDO 2010-2018: En medio del proceso de renegociación del Tratado de Libre Comercio de América del Norte, México y Canadá fortalecen su asociación estratégica. 107 - Ficha Informativa de la XVII Reunión Interparlamentaria (2010). 112 - Ficha Informativa de la XVIII Reunión Interparlamentaria (2011). 116 - Ficha Informativa de la XIX Reunión Interparlamentaria (2013). 121 Introducción. México y Canadá, Historia de una Amistad Parlamentaria. 6 - Ficha Informativa de la XX Reunión Interparlamentaria (2014). 124 Línea del Tiempo. Hitos en la Relación de la Amistad Diplomática y - Ficha Informativa de la XXI Reunión Interparlamentaria (2018). 128 Parlamentaria México-Canadá. 9 Formalización de Relaciones Diplomáticas México-Canadá. 10 Anexo de Declaraciones y Comunicados Conjuntos. 137 El Congreso Mexicano y la Diplomacia Parlamentaria. 24 - Comunicado Conjunto. I Reunión Interparlamentaria México - Canadá. Ciudad Parlamento Canadiense. 28 de México. 6 al 10 de enero de 1975. 138 - Senado de Canadá. 28 - Comunicado Conjunto. II Reunión Interparlamentaria México - Canadá. Ottawa, - Cámara de los Comunes de Canadá. 31 Canadá. 10 y 11 de febrero de 1976. 140 Sesiones Solemnes realizadas en el Senado de la República en Honor a - Comunicado Conjunto. III Reunión Interparlamentaria México - Canadá. Ciudad Visitantes Distinguidos del Parlamento y Gobierno Canadienses. 33 de México, México. 21 al 28 de marzo de 1977. 141 Balance General de las Reuniones Interparlamentarias México – Canadá - Declaración. IV Reunión Interparlamentaria México - Canadá. Ottawa, Canadá. 24 (1975-2018). 42 al 31 de mayo de 1983. 144 La Década de 1970: Las Tres Primeras Reuniones Interparlamentarias - Declaración de Querétaro. V Reunión Interparlamentaria México – Canadá.
    [Show full text]
  • June, 1976 ,'THE TRANSFER of ELECTORAL ALLEGIANCE in ETHNIC POLITICS: A
    THE UNIVERSITY OF MÀNITOBÀ THE TRÀNSFER OF ELECTORÀL ÀLLEGIÀNCE IN ETHNIC POLIT]CS: À STUDY OF THE VOTING BEHÀVTOUR OF FRÀNCO-MÀNTTOBÀNS 1969-1974 by PÀUL BEÀULTEU À THESTS SUBMTTTED TO THE FÀCULTY OF GRÀDUÀTE STUDIES IN PÀRTTÀ], FULFTLLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF }4ÀSTER OF ÀRTS DEPÀRTMENT OF POLTT]CÀL STIJDIES I^IINNIPEG, MÀNITOBÀ June, 1976 ,'THE TRANSFER OF ELECTORAL ALLEGIANCE IN ETHNIC POLITICS: A STUDY OF THE VOTING BEHAVIOUR OF FRANCO.MANITOBANS I969-1974'' by PAUL BEAULIEU A dissertation submitted to the Faculty of Graduate Studies of the U¡riversity of Munitoba in purtial fultìllment ol'the requirements of the tlegrce of MASTER OF ARTS @ tgl6 Pernrissio¡r ltas bccu gratrtcd to tlte LIBRARY OIr TllU UN¡VüR- SITY Olì MANITOBA to lcnd or sclt copies of this tlissertatio¡r, to thc NATIONAL LIBRAIì,Y OF Cr\NADA to ¡nicrolilm (ltis rlissertatiort and to lend or sell copies of the filnl, und UNIVURSITY MICROFTLMS to publish n¡l lbstruct of this dissertution. The ¿t¡tlrr¡r rescrves other publicatio¡¡ rights, and neitl¡er the dissertation nor extensive cxtracts t'ronr it ttray be printed or other- wise reproclucecl without thc ¿tutl¡or's writtcn perntissiun. ÀCKNOI^ILEDGEMENTS I am índebted to those f intervíewed who gave so freely of their valuable tíme to ans\Á¡er my many questíons. Their corffnents broadened my understandíng and stimulated my ínterest. Àbove all, a grateful thanks must be extended to Professor Tom Peterson for hís continued advícer encouragement and persistence. Hís skillful red pen brought a much needed cl-arity and cohesion to the ma terial.
    [Show full text]
  • Tuesday, February 5, 2002
    CANADA 1st SESSION • 37th PARLIAMENT • VOLUME 139 • NUMBER 86 OFFICIAL REPORT (HANSARD) Tuesday, February 5, 2002 THE HONOURABLE DAN HAYS SPEAKER This issue contains the latest listing of Senators, Officers of the Senate, the Ministry, and Senators serving on Standing, Special and Joint Committees. CONTENTS (Daily index of proceedings appears at back of this issue.) Debates and Publications: Chambers Building, Room 943, Tel. 996-0193 Published by the Senate Available from Canada Communication Group — Publishing, Public Works and Government Services Canada, Ottawa K1A 0S9, Also available on the Internet: http://www.parl.gc.ca 2182 THE SENATE Tuesday, February 5, 2002 The Senate met at 2:00 p.m., the Speaker in the Chair. Senator Duhamel is well known for his exceptional service to the people of St. Boniface, Winnipeg and Manitoba as a whole. Prayers. In 1994, he was made a chevalier, or knight, of the Ordre de la Pléiade, and in 2000, appointed an officer of the Assemblée parlementaire de la Francophonie, Canadian division. We are NEW SENATOR certain that his senatorial duties will have no effect whatsoever on his devotion to his province. The Hon. the Speaker: Honourable senators, I have the honour to inform the Senate that the Clerk has received a [English] certificate from the Registrar General of Canada showing that the Honourable Ronald J. Duhamel, P.C., has been summoned to the Honourable senators, Senator Duhamel and I have had some Senate. interesting experiences together — I as a critic of education in the province of Manitoba, and he as the deputy minister of that INTRODUCTION same department.
    [Show full text]
  • The Senate (Hansard) 2Nd Session, 35Th Parliament, Volume 135, Issue 45 Monday, October 28, 1996 the Honourable Gildas L
    7/22/2018 Debates Download as PDF Debates of the Senate (Hansard) 2nd Session, 35th Parliament, Volume 135, Issue 45 Monday, October 28, 1996 The Honourable Gildas L. Molgat, Speaker The Late Honourable Arthur Tremblay, O.C., B.A., M.A., M. Ed. Tributes ROUTINE PROCEEDINGS Employment Insurance (Fishing) Regulations Report of Social Affairs, Science and Technology Committee Presented ORDERS OF THE DAY Judges Act Bill to Amend-Third Reading-motion in amendment-Debate Continued Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act Companies' Creditors Arrangement Act Income Tax Act Bill to Amend-Second Reading-Debate Adjourned Criminal Code Bill to Amend-Second Reading Referred to Committee THE SENATE Monday, October 28, 1996 The Senate met at 8 p.m., the Speaker in the Chair. Prayers. [Translation] The Late Honourable Arthur Tremblay, O.C., B.A., M.A., M. Ed. Tributes Hon. John Lynch-Staunton (Leader of the Opposition): Honourable senators, one of the first new colleagues I had the honour to meet shortly after being appointed to the Senate was the Honourable Arthur Tremblay, whose passing, yesterday, has deeply saddened us all. I already knew him by name, of course. I knew he was one of the great mandarins who shaped Quebec during the 1960s. I knew of his insight and expertise in all constitutional matters. I was not without knowing that he had been involved in the intellectual community and the education field before taking up a career in the public arena, and that he had been granted honourary doctorates by many universities. What I did not know and soon learned was that, first and foremost, the Honourable Arthur Tremblay was a man of great simplicity, who was nice to everyone he encountered along his way.
    [Show full text]
  • The Process for Amending the Constitution of Canada
    THE PROCESS FOR AMENDING THE CONSTITUTION OF CANADA The Report of the Special Joint Committee of the Senate and the House of Commons Joint Chairmen: Hon. Gerald Beaudoin, Senator Jim Edwards, M.P. June 20,1991 SENA'I'E SENKI' HOUSE OF COMMONS CHAMHRE DES COMMUNES Issue No. 1 Tuesday, May 21, 1991 Le mardi 21 mai 1991 Thursday, May 23, 1991 Le jeudi 23 mai 1991 Tuesday, May 28, 1991 Le mardi 28 mai 1991 Wednesday, May 29, 1991 Le mercredi 29 mai 1991 Thursday, May 30, 1991 Le jeudi 30 mai 1991 Tuesday, June 4, 1991 Le mardi 4 juin 1991 Wednesday, June 5, 1991 Le mercredi 5 juin 1991 Thursday, June 6, 1991 Le jcudi 6 juin 1991 Monday, June 10, 1991 Le lundi 10 juin 1991 Tuesday, June 11, 1991 Le mardi 11 juin 1991 Wednesday, June 12, 1991 Le mercredi 12 juin 1991 Tuesday, June 18, 1991 Le mardi 18 juin 1991 Joint Chairmen: Copresidents: Hon. GCrald Beaudoin, Senator L'hon. GCrald Beaudoin, sCnateur Jim Edwards, M.P. Jim Edwards, d6putC Minutes of Proceedings and Evidence of the Special Joint Proc2s-verbaux et timoignages du Comite' mixte spdcial du Committee of the Senate and the House of Commons on Sinat et de la Chambre des communes sur le Process for amending Processus de the Constitution of modification de la Canada Constitution du Canada RESPECTING: CONCERNANT: A study of the process for amending the Constitution of Une Ctude du processus de modification de la Canada Constitution du Canada INCLUDING: Y COMPRIS: The Report to the Senate and to the House of Commons Le Rapport au SCnat et A la Chambre des communes Third Session of the Thirty-fourth Parliament, Troisikme session de la trente-quatrikrne lkgislature, 1991 1991 SPECIAL JOINT COMMITI'EE OF THE SENATE AND COMITE MIXTE SPECIAL DU S~NATET DE LA OF THE HOUSE OF COMMONS ON THE PROCESS CHAMBRE DES COMMUNES SUR LE PROCESSUS DE FOR AMENDING THE CONSTITUTION OF CANADA MODIFICATION DE LA CONSTITUTION DU CANADA Joint Chairmen: Coprhideients : Hon.
    [Show full text]
  • UK Parliament Tour О.В
    UK Parliament Tour О.В. Корецкая Краткое знакомство с парламентом Великобритании Е.Н. Добросклонская О.В. Корецкая Е.Н. Добросклонская UK Parliament Tour Краткое знакомство с парламентом Великобритании Учебное пособие по лингвострановедению Москва 2020 http://izd-mn.com/ 1 UK Parliament Tour О.В. Корецкая Краткое знакомство с парламентом Великобритании Е.Н. Добросклонская УДК 811.111 ББК 81.432.1 К 664 Корецкая, Ольга Владимировна Добросклонская, Екатерина Николаевна К 664 UK Parliament Tour. Краткое знакомство с парламентом Великобритании. Учебное пособие по лингвострановедению. – М.: Мир науки, 2020. – Сетевое издание. Режим доступа: https://izd-mn.com/PDF/33MNNPU20.pdf – Загл. с экрана. ISBN 978-5-6044812-8-8 Учебное пособие служит дополнительным материалом к курсу лингвострановедения Великобритании и представляет основную информацию о политическом устройстве страны – парламенте, партиях, всеобщих выборах, функциях премьер-министра, кабинета и полномочиях монарха. Отличительной особенностью пособия являются специально подобранные к каждой теме видеосюжеты на английском языке, просмотр которых не только знакомит учащихся с британским парламентом, но и значительно развивает навыки восприятия аутентичной звучащей речи. Все видеофрагменты сопровождаются текстовой версией с иллюстрациями и культурно-исторической справкой, дающей более подробные сведения о становлении и функционировании политической системы Британии. Вопросы к тексту нацелены на понимание и обсуждение темы раздела, а послетекстовые задания – на отработку и усвоение активной лексики. Пособие предназначено для студентов ВУЗов, углубленно изучающих английский язык, а также всех, интересующихся политической жизнью Соединенного Королевства. ISBN 978-5-6044812-8-8 © Корецкая Ольга Владимировна, 2020 © Добросклонская Екатерина Николаевна, 2020 © ООО Издательство «Мир науки», 2020 http://izd-mn.com/ 2 UK Parliament Tour О.В. Корецкая Краткое знакомство с парламентом Великобритании Е.Н.
    [Show full text]
  • Divisions in the House of Commons
    BRIEFING PAPER Number 06401, 17 September 2019 Divisions in the House of By Edward Hicks Commons Contents: 1 How divisions work 2 Procedural matters 3. Pairing 4 Proxy Voting 5 Historical development www.parliament.uk/commons-library | intranet.parliament.uk/commons-library | [email protected] | @commonslibrary 2 Divisions in the House of Commons Contents Introduction 3 1 How divisions work 4 1.1 What does the House vote on? 4 1.2 The administration of divisions 4 1.3 An example of a division 6 1.4 Nodding through 6 1.5 Members not voting 7 1.6 Announcing the result 7 1.7 Divisions in Bill Committees 7 1.8 Westminster Hall debates 8 2 Procedural matters 9 2.1 Quorum 9 2.2 Division lists 9 2.3 Division Bells and Annunciators 9 2.4 Procedure if votes are equal 10 2.5 Deferred Divisions 10 2.6 Indicative Votes 11 2.7 Electronic voting 11 3. Pairing 13 3.1 What is pairing? 13 3.2 Pairing over time 13 4 Proxy Voting 15 5 Historical development 16 5.1 Non-Members voting 17 5.2 Time for divisions 17 CRI-7801 by UK Parliament/Mark Crick image. Licensed under CC BY 2.0 / image cropped. 3 Commons Library Briefing, 17 September 2019 Introduction The main form of voting in the House of Commons is known as a ‘division’. Members vote by walking through either an Aye (yes) or a No lobby. Their names are recorded as they file past the clerks and are then counted by the Tellers.
    [Show full text]
  • Henry Kalen Fonds (Mss 256, Pc 219, Tc 128 (A.05-100))
    University of Manitoba Archives & Special Collections Finding Aid - Henry Kalen fonds (Mss 256, Pc 219, Tc 128 (A.05-100)) Generated by Access to Memory (AtoM) 2.3.1 Printed: August 24, 2017 Language of description: English University of Manitoba Archives & Special Collections 330 Elizabeth Dafoe Library Winnipeg Manitoba Canada R3T 2N2 Telephone: 204-474-9986 Fax: 204-474-7913 Email: [email protected] http://umanitoba.ca/libraries/archives/ http://umlarchives.lib.umanitoba.ca/index.php/henry-kalen-fonds Henry Kalen fonds Table of contents Summary information ...................................................................................................................................... 4 Administrative history / Biographical sketch .................................................................................................. 4 Scope and content ........................................................................................................................................... 5 Notes ................................................................................................................................................................ 5 Access points ................................................................................................................................................... 6 Series descriptions ........................................................................................................................................... 6 , Reference and Correspondence, ................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Social Movements Ln Canadian Constitutional Politics, 1938-1992
    MISRECOGNIZED MATERIALISTS: SOCIAL MOVEMENTS LN CANADIAN CONSTITUTIONAL POLITICS, 1938-1992 by MATT JAMES B.A. (Hons), Queen's University, 1993 M.A., The University of British Columbia, 1994 A THESIS SUBMITTED LN PARTIAL FULFILMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES (Department of Political Science) We accept this thesis as conforming to the required standard THE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA July 2000 © Matt James, 2000 In presenting this thesis in partial fulfilment of the requirements for an advanced degree at the University of British Columbia, I agree that the Library shall make it freely available for reference and study. I further agree that permission for extensive copying of this thesis for scholarly purposes may be granted by the head of my department or by his or her representatives. It is understood that copying or publication of this thesis for financial gain shall not be allowed without my written permission. Department of ftli'iiaI Science The University of British Columbia Vancouver, Canada Date cd II DE-6 (2788) Abstract MISRECOGNIZED MATERIALISTS: SOCIAL MOVEMENTS IN CANADIAN CONSTITUTIONAL POLITICS, 1938-1992 Although Ronald Inglehart's New Politics theory has attracted criticism, its influential distinction between materialist and postmaterialist values tends to go unquestioned. The influence of this distinction is particularly apparent when analysts interpret the "new" social movement emphasis on esteem and belonging as a "postmaterialist" departure from a traditional, or "materialist" focus on security. This way of understanding contemporary feminist and ethnocultural-minority movements is misleading because it rests on a one- dimensional view of esteem and belonging.
    [Show full text]