GABAA Receptor Subtype- and Function-Selective Ligands: Key Issues in Translation to Humans

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

GABAA Receptor Subtype- and Function-Selective Ligands: Key Issues in Translation to Humans 1521-0081/70/4/836–878$35.00 https://doi.org/10.1124/pr.117.014449 PHARMACOLOGICAL REVIEWS Pharmacol Rev 70:836–878, October 2018 Copyright © 2018 by The American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics ASSOCIATE EDITOR: ELIOT H. OHLSTEIN International Union of Basic and Clinical Pharmacology. CVI: GABAA Receptor Subtype- and Function-selective Ligands: Key Issues in Translation to Humans Werner Sieghart and Miroslav M. Savic Center for Brain Research, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria (W.S.) and Department of Pharmacology, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia (M.M.S.) Abstract ....................................................................................838 I. Introduction . ..............................................................................838 A. g-Aminobutyric Acid Type A Receptors and Their Heterogeneity.........................838 B. g-Aminobutyric Acid Type A Receptor Structure and Pharmacology. ...................839 C. Aim of the Present Review. ............................................................840 Downloaded from II. Receptor Subtype-selective Binding Versus Subtype-selective Efficacy........................841 III. Receptor Subtype-selective Efficacy—Dependence on the Conditions of Measurements. .......841 IV. Importance of Concentration-response Relationships of “Receptor Subtype-selective Ligands”....................................................................................842 A. Referring Compound Actions to that of Standard Benzodiazepines Distorts Original by guest on September 26, 2021 Data ...................................................................................842 B. Maximal Efficacy Hides a Possible Subtype Selectivity at Lower Concentrations . .......843 C. Concentration of Compounds Eliciting In Vivo Effects ...................................843 V. Currently Available Compounds Claimed to Be g-Aminobutyric Acid Type A Receptor Subtype-Selective . ........................................................................843 A. Subtype-Selectivity Claimed for Incompletely Investigated Compounds ..................843 B. Compounds Claimed to Selectively Modulate a1bg2 Receptors . .........................844 1. Zolpidem............................................................................844 2. Indiplon ............................................................................845 3. Zaleplon, Zopiclone ..................................................................845 4. b-CCt . ..............................................................................846 5. Ro15-1788 (Flumazenil) . ............................................................846 C. Compounds Claimed to Selectively Modulate a2bg2, a3bg2, and a5bg2 Receptors. .......846 1. L-838,417 . ........................................................................847 2. TPA-023B. ........................................................................847 3. NS11394, NS16085..................................................................847 D. Compounds Claimed to Selectively Modulate a2bg2 and a3bg2 Receptors. .............848 1. Compound 4 ........................................................................848 2. Pyridazine Series of a2bg2- and a3bg2-selective Compounds .........................848 3. SL-651,498. ........................................................................848 4. TPA023 .............................................................................848 5. MRK-409 . ........................................................................849 6. SH-053-29-N (HZ166), MP-III-024, KRM-II-81. .....................................850 7. Baicalin.............................................................................851 8. 6-Hydroxyflavone . ..................................................................851 Address correspondence to: Werner Sieghart, Department of Molecular Neurosciences, Center for Brain Research, Medical University of Vienna, Spitalgasse 4, A-1090 Vienna, Austria. E-mail: [email protected] In part, financial support was provided by the Ministry of Education, Science and Technological Development, R. Serbia – Grant No. 175076 (MMS). https://doi.org/10.1124/pr.117.014449. 836 GABAA Receptor Subtype- and Function-selective Ligands 837 9. Fa131. ..............................................................................851 10. AZD7325............................................................................851 E. Compounds Claimed to Selectively Modulate a3bg2 Receptors . .........................852 1. TP003 ..............................................................................852 2. YT-III-31............................................................................853 3. a3IA................................................................................853 F. Compounds Claimed to Selectively Modulate a5bg2 Receptors . .........................853 1. SH-053-R-CH3-29F, MP-III-022 ......................................................854 2. a5IA................................................................................854 3. a5IA-II .............................................................................854 4. MRK-016 . ........................................................................855 5. L-655,708 . ........................................................................855 6. PWZ-029............................................................................856 7. RY-024 .............................................................................856 8. RO4938581 . ........................................................................856 9. TB21007 ............................................................................857 10. S44819. .............................................................................857 11. XLi-093 .............................................................................857 G. Compounds Preferentially Modulating a4bg2 and/or a6bg2 Receptors ...................858 1. CMD-45.............................................................................858 2. XHe-III-74 . ........................................................................858 3. PZ-II-029 (Compound 6), LAU159, LAU463 ..........................................859 4. (+)ROD188. ........................................................................859 5. Amiloride . ........................................................................860 6. Furosemide . ........................................................................860 H. Benzodiazepine Site Antagonist Actions . ................................................860 I. Compounds Claimed to Selectively Modulate b1-containing GABAA Receptors ...........861 1. Salicylidene Salicylhydrazide . ......................................................861 2. Fragrant Dioxane Derivatives . ......................................................861 3. Pyrazoloquinolinones ................................................................862 J. Compounds Claimed to Selectively Modulate b2/3-containing GABAA Receptors. .......863 1. Loreclezole, Etomidate, and Others . ................................................863 2. Etifoxine and Polyacetylene Compounds . ..........................................864 3. b2/3-Selective Enaminones (Compound 2-261) . .....................................864 4. Function of b2orb3 Subunit-containing GABAA Receptors. .........................864 K. Compounds Claimed To Modulate Selectively d-Containing GABAA Receptors............864 1. g-Aminobutyric Acid Site Ligands . ................................................865 a. THIP (gaboxadol) ................................................................865 b. Thio-4-PIOL . ..................................................................865 c. Thio-THIP .......................................................................865 d. GABA site antagonists ...........................................................865 2. Neurosteroids and Tracazolate ......................................................866 3. Ketamine . ........................................................................866 4. DS2.................................................................................866 5. Methaqualone.......................................................................866 L. Compounds Modulating g1- or g3-Containing GABAA Receptors .........................867 M. Compounds Modulating «-, u-, or p-Containing GABAA Receptors........................867 N. Compounds Modulating r-Containing GABAA Receptors . ...............................868 VI. Discrepancy between the In Vivo Effects of Drugs in Rodent and Human Studies ............868 A. Receptors Containing b1-Subunits Might Contribute to the Sedative Action of Benzodiazepine Site Ligands............................................................869 B. Receptors Containing g1org3 Subunits, or Those Containing a4, a6, or d Subunits, Might Contribute to the In Vivo Effects of Benzodiazepine Site Ligands .................870 ABBREVIATIONS: DBI, diazepam binding inhibitor; GABA, g-aminobutyric acid; GABAA-receptor, GABA type A receptor; GABAB- receptor, GABA type B receptor; KCC2, K+-Cl2 cotransporter 2; NKCC1, Na+-K+-2Cl2 cotransporter 1; TSPO, translocator protein (18 kDa). 838 Sieghart and Savic C. Additional Interaction with Targets Different from GABAA Receptors Could Also Contribute to the Separation of Anxiolytic and Sedative Properties of Ligands ...........870
Recommended publications
  • (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2017/0020892 A1 Thompson Et Al
    US 20170020892A1 (19) United States (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2017/0020892 A1 Thompson et al. (43) Pub. Date: Jan. 26, 2017 (54) USE OF NEGATIVE MODULATORS OF Related U.S. Application Data GABA RECEPTORS CONTAINING ALPHAS SUBUNITS AS FAST ACTING (60) Provisional application No. 61/972,446, filed on Mar. ANTDEPRESSANTS 31, 2014. (71) Applicant: University of Maryland, Baltimore, Publication Classification Baltimore, MD (US) (51) Int. Cl. A 6LX 3/557 (2006.01) (72) Inventors: Scott Thompson, Baltimore, MD (US); A6II 3/53 (2006.01) Mark D. Kvarta, Ellicott City, MD A6II 45/06 (2006.01) (US); Adam Van Dyke, Baltimore, MD (52) U.S. Cl. (US) CPC ........... A61 K3I/55.17 (2013.01); A61K 45/06 (2013.01); A61 K3I/53 (2013.01) (73) Assignee: University of Maryland, Baltimore, Baltimore, MD (US) (57) ABSTRACT Embodiments of the disclosure include methods and com (21) Appl. No.: 15/300,984 positions related to treatment of one or more medical conditions with one or more negative modulators of GABA (22) PCT Filed: Mar. 31, 2015 receptors. In specific embodiments, depression and/or Sui cidability is treated or ameliorated or prevented with one or (86) PCT No.: PCT/US2O15/023667 more negative modulators of GABA receptors, such as a S 371 (c)(1), partial inverse agonist of a GABA receptor comprising an (2) Date: Sep. 30, 2016 alpha5 subunit. Patent Application Publication Jan. 26, 2017. Sheet 1 of 12 US 2017/002O892 A1 ×1/ /|\ Patent Application Publication Jan. 26, 2017. Sheet 3 of 12 US 2017/002O892 A1 & Patent Application Publication Jan.
    [Show full text]
  • BMC Pharmacology Biomed Central
    CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by Springer - Publisher Connector BMC Pharmacology BioMed Central Research article Open Access Pharmacological Properties of DOV 315,090, an ocinaplon metabolite Dmytro Berezhnoy†1, Maria C Gravielle†1, Scott Downing1, Emmanuel Kostakis1, Anthony S Basile2, Phil Skolnick2, Terrell T Gibbs1 and David H Farb*1 Address: 1Laboratory of Molecular Neurobiology, Department of Pharmacology & Experimental Therapeutics, Boston University School of Medicine, 715 Albany St., Boston, MA 02118, USA and 2DOV Pharmaceutical, Inc, 150 Pierce St., Somerset, NJ 08873-4185, USA Email: Dmytro Berezhnoy - [email protected]; Maria C Gravielle - [email protected]; Scott Downing - [email protected]; Emmanuel Kostakis - [email protected]; Anthony S Basile - [email protected]; Phil Skolnick - [email protected]; Terrell T Gibbs - [email protected]; David H Farb* - [email protected] * Corresponding author †Equal contributors Published: 13 June 2008 Received: 20 December 2007 Accepted: 13 June 2008 BMC Pharmacology 2008, 8:11 doi:10.1186/1471-2210-8-11 This article is available from: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2210/8/11 © 2008 Berezhnoy et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Background: Compounds targeting the benzodiazepine binding site of the GABAA-R are widely prescribed for the treatment of anxiety disorders, epilepsy, and insomnia as well as for pre- anesthetic sedation and muscle relaxation. It has been hypothesized that these various pharmacological effects are mediated by different GABAA-R subtypes.
    [Show full text]
  • 18 December 2020 – to Date)
    (18 December 2020 – to date) MEDICINES AND RELATED SUBSTANCES ACT 101 OF 1965 (Gazette No. 1171, Notice No. 1002 dated 7 July 1965. Commencement date: 1 April 1966 [Proc. No. 94, Gazette No. 1413] SCHEDULES Government Notice 935 in Government Gazette 31387 dated 5 September 2008. Commencement date: 5 September 2008. As amended by: Government Notice R1230 in Government Gazette 32838 dated 31 December 2009. Commencement date: 31 December 2009. Government Notice R227 in Government Gazette 35149 dated 15 March 2012. Commencement date: 15 March 2012. Government Notice R674 in Government Gazette 36827 dated 13 September 2013. Commencement date: 13 September 2013. Government Notice R690 in Government Gazette 36850 dated 20 September 2013. Commencement date: 20 September 2013. Government Notice R104 in Government Gazette 37318 dated 11 February 2014. Commencement date: 11 February 2014. Government Notice R352 in Government Gazette 37622 dated 8 May 2014. Commencement date: 8 May 2014. Government Notice R234 in Government Gazette 38586 dated 20 March 2015. Commencement date: 20 March 2015. Government Notice 254 in Government Gazette 39815 dated 15 March 2016. Commencement date: 15 March 2016. Government Notice 620 in Government Gazette 40041 dated 3 June 2016. Commencement date: 3 June 2016. Prepared by: Page 2 of 199 Government Notice 748 in Government Gazette 41009 dated 28 July 2017. Commencement date: 28 July 2017. Government Notice 1261 in Government Gazette 41256 dated 17 November 2017. Commencement date: 17 November 2017. Government Notice R1098 in Government Gazette 41971 dated 12 October 2018. Commencement date: 12 October 2018. Government Notice R1262 in Government Gazette 42052 dated 23 November 2018.
    [Show full text]
  • Benzodiazepines: Uses and Risks Charlie Reznikoff, MD Hennepin Healthcare
    Benzodiazepines: Uses and Risks Charlie Reznikoff, MD Hennepin healthcare 4/22/2020 Overview benzodiazepines • Examples of benzos and benzo like drugs • Indications for benzos • Pharmacology of benzos • Side effects and contraindications • Benzo withdrawal • Benzo tapers 12/06/2018 Sedative/Hypnotics • Benzodiazepines • Alcohol • Z-drugs (Benzo-like sleeping aids) • Barbiturates • GHB • Propofol • Some inhalants • Gabapentin? Pregabalin? 12/06/2018 Examples of benzodiazepines • Midazolam (Versed) • Triazolam (Halcion) • Alprazolam (Xanax) • Lorazepam (Ativan) • Temazepam (Restoril) • Oxazepam (Serax) • Clonazepam (Klonopin) • Diazepam (Valium) • Chlordiazepoxide (Librium) 4/22/2020 Sedatives: gaba stimulating drugs have incomplete “cross tolerance” 12/06/2018 Effects from sedative (Benzo) use • Euphoria/bliss • Suppresses seizures • Amnesia • Muscle relaxation • Clumsiness, visio-spatial impairment • Sleep inducing • Respiratory suppression • Anxiolysis/disinhibition 12/06/2018 Tolerance to benzo effects? • Effects quickly diminish with repeated use (weeks) • Euphoria/bliss • Suppresses seizures • Effects incompletely diminish with repeated use • Amnesia • Muscle relaxation • Clumsiness, visio-spatial impairment • Seep inducing • Durable effects with repeated use • Respiratory suppression • Anxiolysis/disinhibition 12/06/2018 If you understand this pharmacology you can figure out the rest... • Potency • 1 mg diazepam <<< 1 mg alprazolam • Duration of action • Half life differences • Onset of action • Euphoria, clinical utility in acute
    [Show full text]
  • Pexion, Imepitoin
    ANNEX I SUMMARY OF PRODUCT CHARACTERISTICS 1 1. NAME OF THE VETERINARY MEDICINAL PRODUCT Pexion 100 mg tablets for dogs Pexion 400 mg tablets for dogs 2. QUALITATIVE AND QUANTITATIVE COMPOSITION One tablet contains: Active substance: Imepitoin 100 mg Imepitoin 400 mg For the full list of excipients, see section 6.1. 3. PHARMACEUTICAL FORM Tablets White, oblong, half-scored tablets with embedded logo “I 01” (100 mg) or “I 02” (400 mg) on one side. The tablet can be divided into equal halves. 4. CLINICAL PARTICULARS 4.1 Target species Dog 4.2 Indications for use, specifying the target species For the reduction of the frequency of generalised seizures due to idiopathic epilepsy in dogs for use after careful evaluation of alternative treatment options. 4.3 Contraindications Do not use in case of hypersensitivity to the active substance or to any of the excipients. Do not use in dogs with severely impaired hepatic function, severe renal or severe cardiovascular disorders (see section 4.7). 4.4 Special warnings The pharmacological response to imepitoin may vary and efficacy may not be complete. Nevertheless imepitoin is considered to be a suitable treatment option in some dogs because of its safety profile (see section 5.1). On treatment, some dogs will be free of seizures, in other dogs a reduction of the number of seizures will be observed, whilst others may be non-responders. In non-responders, an increase in seizure frequency may be observed. Should seizures not be adequately controlled, further diagnostic measures and other antiepileptic treatment should be considered. The benefit/risk assessment for the individual dog should take into account the details in the product literature.
    [Show full text]
  • NIH Public Access Author Manuscript Synapse
    NIH Public Access Author Manuscript Synapse. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2010 May 4. NIH-PA Author ManuscriptPublished NIH-PA Author Manuscript in final edited NIH-PA Author Manuscript form as: Synapse. 2006 November ; 60(6): 411±419. doi:10.1002/syn.20314. GABAA Receptor Regulation of Voluntary Ethanol Drinking Requires PKCε Joyce Besheer, Veronique Lepoutre, Beth Mole, and Clyde W. Hodge* Bowles Center for Alcohol Studies, Department of Psychiatry, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599 Abstract Protein kinase C (PKC) regulates a variety of neural functions, including ion channel activity, neurotransmitter release, receptor desensitization and differentiation. We have shown previously that mice lacking the ε-isoform of PKC (PKCε) self-administer 75% less ethanol and exhibit supersensitivity to acute ethanol and allosteric positive modulators of GABAA receptors when compared with wild-type controls. The purpose of the present study was to examine involvement of PKCε in GABAA receptor regulation of voluntary ethanol drinking. To address this question, PKCε null-mutant and wild-type control mice were allowed to drink ethanol (10% v/v) vs. water on a two-bottle continuous access protocol. The effects of diazepam (nonselective GABAA BZ positive modulator), zolpidem (GABAA α1 agonist), L-655,708 (BZ-sensitive GABAA α5 inverse agonist), and flumazenil (BZ antagonist) were then tested on ethanol drinking. Ethanol intake (grams/kg/day) by wild-type mice decreased significantly after diazepam or zolpidem but increased after L-655,708 administration. Flumazenil antagonized diazepam-induced reductions in ethanol drinking in wild- type mice. However, ethanol intake by PKCε null mice was not altered by any of the GABAergic compounds even though effects were seen on water drinking in these mice.
    [Show full text]
  • Valerenic Acid Potentiates and Inhibits GABAA Receptors: Molecular Mechanism and Subunit Specificity
    ARTICLE IN PRESS + MODEL Neuropharmacology xx (2007) 1e10 www.elsevier.com/locate/neuropharm Valerenic acid potentiates and inhibits GABAA receptors: Molecular mechanism and subunit specificity S. Khom a, I. Baburin a, E. Timin a, A. Hohaus a, G. Trauner b, B. Kopp b, S. Hering a,* a Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Vienna, Althanstrasse 14, A-1090 Vienna, Austria b Department of Pharmacognosy, University of Vienna, Althanstrasse 14, A-1090 Vienna, Austria Received 8 December 2006; received in revised form 11 April 2007; accepted 30 April 2007 Abstract Valerian is a commonly used herbal medicinal product for the treatment of anxiety and insomnia. Here we report the stimulation of chloride currents through GABAA receptors (IGABA) by valerenic acid (VA), a constituent of Valerian. To analyse the molecular basis of VA action, we expressed GABAA receptors with 13 different subunit compositions in Xenopus oocytes and measured IGABA using the two-microelectrode voltage-clamp technique. We report a subtype-dependent stimulation of IGABA by VA. Only channels incorporating b2 or b3 subunits were stimulated by VA. Replacing b2/3 by b1 drastically reduced the sensitivity of the resulting GABAA channels. The stimulatory effect of VA on a1b2 receptors was substantially reduced by the point mutation b2N265S (known to inhibit loreclezole action). Mutating the corresponding residue of b1 (b1S290N) induced VA sensitivity in a1b1S290N comparable to a1b2 receptors. Modulation of IGABA was not significantly dependent on incorporation of a1, a2, a3 or a5 subunits. VA displayed a significantly lower efficiency on channels incorporating a4 subunits. IGABA modulation by VA was not g subunit dependent and not inhibited by flumazenil (1 mM).
    [Show full text]
  • GABA Receptors
    D Reviews • BIOTREND Reviews • BIOTREND Reviews • BIOTREND Reviews • BIOTREND Reviews Review No.7 / 1-2011 GABA receptors Wolfgang Froestl , CNS & Chemistry Expert, AC Immune SA, PSE Building B - EPFL, CH-1015 Lausanne, Phone: +41 21 693 91 43, FAX: +41 21 693 91 20, E-mail: [email protected] GABA Activation of the GABA A receptor leads to an influx of chloride GABA ( -aminobutyric acid; Figure 1) is the most important and ions and to a hyperpolarization of the membrane. 16 subunits with γ most abundant inhibitory neurotransmitter in the mammalian molecular weights between 50 and 65 kD have been identified brain 1,2 , where it was first discovered in 1950 3-5 . It is a small achiral so far, 6 subunits, 3 subunits, 3 subunits, and the , , α β γ δ ε θ molecule with molecular weight of 103 g/mol and high water solu - and subunits 8,9 . π bility. At 25°C one gram of water can dissolve 1.3 grams of GABA. 2 Such a hydrophilic molecule (log P = -2.13, PSA = 63.3 Å ) cannot In the meantime all GABA A receptor binding sites have been eluci - cross the blood brain barrier. It is produced in the brain by decarb- dated in great detail. The GABA site is located at the interface oxylation of L-glutamic acid by the enzyme glutamic acid decarb- between and subunits. Benzodiazepines interact with subunit α β oxylase (GAD, EC 4.1.1.15). It is a neutral amino acid with pK = combinations ( ) ( ) , which is the most abundant combi - 1 α1 2 β2 2 γ2 4.23 and pK = 10.43.
    [Show full text]
  • Dynamic Regulation of the GABAA Receptor Function by Redox Mechanisms S
    Supplemental material to this article can be found at: http://molpharm.aspetjournals.org/content/suppl/2016/07/20/mol.116.105205.DC1 1521-0111/90/3/326–333$25.00 http://dx.doi.org/10.1124/mol.116.105205 MOLECULAR PHARMACOLOGY Mol Pharmacol 90:326–333, September 2016 Copyright ª 2016 by The American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics MINIREVIEW—A LATIN AMERICAN PERSPECTIVE ON ION CHANNELS Dynamic Regulation of the GABAA Receptor Function by Redox Mechanisms s Daniel J. Calvo and Andrea N. Beltrán González Laboratorio de Neurobiología Celular y Molecular, Instituto de Investigaciones en Ingeniería Genética y Biología Molecular Downloaded from ¨Dr. Héctor N. Torres¨ (INGEBI), Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Argentina (D.J.C., A.N.B.G.) Received May 15, 2016; accepted July 14, 2016 ABSTRACT molpharm.aspetjournals.org Oxidizing and reducing agents, which are currently involved normally present in neurons and glia or are endogenously in cell metabolism and signaling pathways, can regulate fast generated in these cells under physiologic states or during inhibitory neurotransmission mediated by GABA receptors in the oxidative stress (e.g., hydrogen peroxide, superoxide and hy- nervous system. A number of in vitro studies have shown that droxyl radicals, nitric oxide, ascorbic acid, and glutathione), diverse redox compounds, including redox metabolites and induce potentiating or inhibiting actions on different native and reactive oxygen and nitrogen species, modulate phasic and recombinant GABAA receptor subtypes. Based on these results, it tonic responses mediated by neuronal GABAA receptors through is thought that redox signaling might represent a homeostatic both presynaptic and postsynaptic mechanisms.
    [Show full text]
  • Anxiety Disorders and GABA Neurotransmission: a Disturbance of Modulation
    Journal name: Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment Article Designation: REVIEW Year: 2015 Volume: 11 Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment Dovepress Running head verso: Nuss Running head recto: Anxiety and modulation open access to scientific and medical research DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/NDT.S58841 Open Access Full Text Article REVIEW Anxiety disorders and GABA neurotransmission: a disturbance of modulation Philippe Nuss1,2 Abstract: Lines of evidence coming from many branches of neuroscience indicate that anxiety 1Department of Psychiatry, Hôpital St disorders arise from a dysfunction in the modulation of brain circuits which regulate emotional Antoine, AP-HP, 2UMR 7203, INSERM responses to potentially threatening stimuli. The concept of anxiety disorders as a disturbance ERL 1057 – Bioactive Molecules of emotional response regulation is a useful one as it allows anxiety to be explained in terms Laboratory, Pierre and Marie Curie University, Paris, France of a more general model of aberrant salience and also because it identifies avenues for devel- oping psychological, behavioral, and pharmacological strategies for the treatment of anxiety disorder. These circuits involve bottom-up activity from the amygdala, indicating the presence of potentially threatening stimuli, and top-down control mechanisms originating in the prefron- tal cortex, signaling the emotional salience of stimuli. Understanding the factors that control cortical mechanisms may open the way to identification of more effective cognitive behavioral strategies for managing anxiety disorders. The brain circuits in the amygdala are thought to For personal use only. comprise inhibitory networks of γ-aminobutyric acid-ergic (GABAergic) interneurons and this neurotransmitter thus plays a key role in the modulation of anxiety responses both in the normal and pathological state.
    [Show full text]
  • Neonatal Clonazepam Administration Induced Long-Lasting Changes in GABAA and GABAB Receptors
    International Journal of Molecular Sciences Article Neonatal Clonazepam Administration Induced Long-Lasting Changes in GABAA and GABAB Receptors Hana Kubová 1,* , Zde ˇnkaBendová 2,3 , Simona Moravcová 2,3 , Dominika Paˇcesová 2,3, Luisa Rocha 4 and Pavel Mareš 1 1 Institute of Physiology, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, 14220 Prague, Czech Republic; [email protected] 2 Faculty of Science, Charles University, 12800 Prague, Czech Republic; [email protected] (Z.B.); [email protected] (S.M.); [email protected] (D.P.) 3 National Institute of Mental Health, 25067 Klecany, Czech Republic 4 Pharmacobiology Department, Center of Research and Advanced Studies, Mexico City 14330, Mexico; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +420-2-4106-2565 Received: 31 March 2020; Accepted: 28 April 2020; Published: 30 April 2020 Abstract: Benzodiazepines (BZDs) are widely used in patients of all ages. Unlike adults, neonatal animals treated with BZDs exhibit a variety of behavioral deficits later in life; however, the mechanisms underlying these deficits are poorly understood. This study aims to examine whether administration of clonazepam (CZP; 1 mg/kg/day) in 7–11-day-old rats affects Gama aminobutyric acid (GABA)ergic receptors in both the short and long terms. Using RT-PCR and quantitative autoradiography, we examined the expression of the selected GABAA receptor subunits (α1, α2, α4, γ2, and δ) and the GABAB B2 subunit, and GABAA, benzodiazepine, and GABAB receptor binding 48 h, 1 week, and 2 months after treatment discontinuation. Within one week after CZP cessation, the expression of the α2 subunit was upregulated, whereas that of the δ subunit was downregulated in both the hippocampus and cortex.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation of Pexion® (Imepitoin) for Treatment of Storm Anxiety in Dogs: a Randomised, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial
    Received: 20 July 2020 Revised: 7 October 2020 Accepted: 3 December 2020 DOI: 10.1002/vetr.18 ORIGINAL RESEARCH Evaluation of Pexion® (imepitoin) for treatment of storm anxiety in dogs: A randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial Irina Perdew1 Carrie Emke1 Brianna Johnson1 Vaidehi Dixit2 Yukun Song2 Emily H. Griffith2 Philip Watson3 Margaret E. Gruen1 1 Department of Clinical Sciences, North Abstract Carolina State University College of Background: While often grouped with other noise aversions, fearful Veterinary Medicine, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA behaviour during storms is considered more complex than noise aversion 2 Department of Statistics, North Carolina alone. The objective here was to assess the effect of imepitoin for the treat- State University College of Sciences, Raleigh, ment of storm anxiety in dogs. North Carolina, USA Methods: In this double-blind, placebo-controlled randomised study, eligible 3 Ingelheim am Rhein, Boehringer-Ingelheim dogs completed a baseline then were randomised to receive either imepitoin Vetmedica GmbH, Ludwigshafen am Rhein, (n = 30; 30 mg/kg BID) or placebo (n = 15) for 28 days. During storms, owners Germany rated their dog’s intensity for 16 behaviours using a Likert scale. Weekly, own- Correspondence ers rated intensity and frequency of these behaviours. Summary scores were Margaret E. Gruen, Department of Clinical compared to baseline and between groups. Sciences, North Carolina State University Results and Conclusions: Imepitoin was significantly superior to placebo in College of Veterinary Medicine, 1060 William Moore Drive, Raleigh NC 27607, USA. storm logs and weekly surveys for weeks 2 and 4, and in the end-of-study sur- Email: [email protected] vey.
    [Show full text]