Pakistan-Iran Relations Since 2005-2015: Political Andeconomic Dimensions

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Pakistan-Iran Relations Since 2005-2015: Political Andeconomic Dimensions PAKISTAN-IRAN RELATIONS SINCE 2005-2015: POLITICAL ANDECONOMIC DIMENSIONS Submitted By MUHAMMAD NAVEED UL HASAN SHAH PhD Scholar DEPARTMENT OF POLITICAL SCIENCE UNIVERSITY OF PESHAWAR SESSION: 2011-12 DEDICATION This work is nicely dedicated to my parents; Especially to my father Syed Jaffar Hussain Shah (Late) & To my wife & dear sons Shabeeb Ul Hasan Syed & Muneeb ul Hasan Syed i TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of contents ............................................................................................................. i Acknowledgements ....................................................................................................... vi Abbreviations ............................................................................................................... vii Abstract .......................................................................................................................... x Chapter - 1 .................................................................................................................... 1 PAKISTAN-IRAN RELATIONS SINCE 2005-2015: POLITICAL AND ECONOMIC DIMENSIONS ...................................................................................... 1 1.1 Introduction ..................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Statement of the Problem ................................................................................ 3 1.3 Justification of the Study ................................................................................. 4 1.4 Aims and Objectives of the Study ................................................................... 5 5. To assess the possible outcomes of the significant challenges to Pak-Iran relations. ..................................................................................................................... 5 1.5 Research Questions ......................................................................................... 6 1.6 Methodology ................................................................................................... 6 Chapter-2 ...................................................................................................................... 7 AN OVERVIEW OF PAK-IRAN RELATIONS Brief History .............................. 7 2.1 Chapter Overview ......................................... Error! Bookmark not defined. 2.2 Introduction ..................................................................................................... 7 2.3 Foreign policy of Pakistan: An Overview ..................................................... 13 2.4 Foreign policy of Iran: An overview ............................................................. 17 2.5 Impacts Of Pak-Iran Foreign Policies Upon Each Other .............................. 19 2.6 Pak-Iran ties since 1947 to Islamic Revolution 1979 .................................... 21 2.7 Economic Conditions ofPakistan And Iran In Early Period ......................... 27 2.8 Pak-Iran relations from 1971 to the fall of shah............................................ 28 2.9 Pak-Iran relations post Islamic revolution in Iran 1979 ................................ 34 ii 2.10 Bilateral ties of Pak-Iran touched bottom line ever in 1990s ........................ 39 2.11 New beginning of Pak-Iran relations since Khatami regime ........................ 43 2.12 Fall of Taliban; a major hurdle erased in Pak-Iran relations ......................... 44 2.13 Post 9/11 Scenario and USA attack on Afghanistan. .................................... 45 2.14 Disagreement on Deployment of US allies forces in Afghanistan................ 48 2.15 Pakistan And Iran Reservations On Their Relations with India And US respectively............................................................................................................... 50 2.16 Conclusion ..................................................................................................... 51 Chapter-3 .................................................................................................................... 52 PAK-IRAN POLITICAL CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES ................. 52 3.1 A glance on the chapter ................................. Error! Bookmark not defined. 3.2 Background ................................................................................................... 52 3.3 Introduction ................................................................................................... 54 3.4 Pak-Iran Relations And Rise Of Taliban In Afghanistan .............................. 58 3.5 Pak-Iran relations under US pressure ............................................................ 59 3.6 Pak-Iran Relations And Role Of KSA .......................................................... 60 3.7 Joint Commission on Security: (2001) .......................................................... 62 3.8 Parvez Musharraf’s visit of Iran: (2008) ....................................................... 63 3.9 Different Major challenges in Pak-Iran relations .......................................... 65 3.10 Human Trafficking ........................................................................................ 65 3.11 Iran motivated for border fencing ................................................................. 66 3.12 Iran crosses border attacks on Pakistan ......................................................... 67 3.13 US Factor and foreign policy of Pakistan ..................................................... 69 3.14 Iran foreign policy in glance ......................................................................... 69 3.15 Pakistan foreign policy in glance .................................................................. 70 3.16 Iran-US rivalry .............................................................................................. 71 3.17 Politics Of Energy: Pak-Iran RelationsAnd Role Of India ........................... 73 iii 3.18 Gas pipeline from directly Iran to Pakistan via eastern border ..................... 74 3.19 Good relations of US, IRAN AND PAKISTAN .......................................... 77 3.20 Divergence of Pak-Iran interests: Chahbahar and Gawadar port .................. 77 3.21 Role of Baluchistan in Pak-Iran relations ..................................................... 77 3.22 Pak-Iran border situating in Baluchitsn (Pakistan) and Sistan-Baluchistan (Iran) region.............................................................................................................. 78 3.23 Baluchistan a doorway in between Pak-Iran ................................................. 80 3.24 Baluchistan-Sistan ......................................................................................... 80 3.25 Baluchistan opportunity or challenge for Pak-Iran neighbors ...................... 83 3.26 Iran’s view regarding Kashmir issue ............................................................. 87 3.27 Terrorism & Sectarianism a Major hurdle in Pak-Iran relations ................... 88 3.28 Balochistan Based Jundallah Organization ................................................... 89 3.29 Major assaults done by Jundullah ................................................................. 94 3.30 How Jondollah was highly developed? ......................................................... 96 3.31 Backing support of Jondollah ........................................................................ 97 3.32 Iranian Measures Against Jundullah’sActivities ........................................... 99 3.33 Concluding Remarks OnJondullah................................................................ 99 3.34 Sectarian Violence in Baluchistan and the Assassination of Hazara .......... 100 3.35 Terrorist organizations in Sistan-Baluchistan region of Iran ...................... 103 3.36 Jaish ul Adl .................................................................................................. 103 3.37 Harkate Ansar (HAI) ................................................................................... 105 3.38 Attack on Iran and issue of nuclear program .............................................. 105 3.39 Conclusion ................................................................................................... 107 Chapter - 4 ................................................................................................................ 109 PAKISTAN-IRAN RELATIONS: ECONOMIC CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES .................................................................................................. 109 4.1 Chapter Overview ......................................... Error! Bookmark not defined. 4.2 Economic Relations: Background ............................................................... 109 iv 4.3 Introduction Economic and Trade Relations ............................................... 112 4.4 Pak-Iran relations in energy context: Pakistan importing electricity .......... 115 4.5 Issues in Baluchistan For Economics of Both Countries ............................ 118 4.6 Pak-Iran Joint Venture in Baluchistan ........................................................ 119 4.7 IPI Project .................................................................................................... 119 4.8 Proposed Mutual Projects............................................................................ 120 4.10 Respective Institutional Economic Engagement ......................................... 121 4.11 Joint Economic Commission ......................................................................
Recommended publications
  • EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT Committee on Foreign Affairs
    EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT Committee on Foreign Affairs Brussels, 27 July 2004 REPORT OF AD HOC DELEGATION VISITS TO KASHMIR (8-11 DECEMBER 2003 AND 20-24 JUNE 2004) Introduction As part of the European Parliament's contribution to helping shape EU policy on the Kashmir issue, the Committee on Foreign Affairs, Human Rights, Common Security and Defence Policy decided to send a delegation to both parts of Kashmir, and to the respective national capitals of Pakistan and India. The delegation's objective was to meet with a wide spectrum of political and public opinion, to learn their views on current developments and hopes for the future, and to see the situation on the ground at first- hand. For timetabling and logistical reasons, it was decided that the visit to the two sides (Islamabad and Pakistan-administered Kashmir (known as Azaad Jammu and Kashmir - AJK - on the Pakistan side) -, and to New Delhi and Jammu and Kashmir - Indian- administered Kashmir, would have to take place separately. The first visit took place from 8-11 December 2003; the second, originally planned for the spring of 2004 was delayed because of the elections which were unexpectedly called in India, and finally took place from 20-25 June 2004. It was stressed throughout the preparatory phases that the two delegation visits should be undertaken by the same Members - which, with one exception, was the case - and that the two visits should aim to follow similar programmes in order to ensure continuity and for a balanced comparison to be made. The delegation was led by John Walls Cushnahan, and in December 2003 included Bob van den Bos, David Bowe, Glyn Ford, Jas Gawronski, Reinhold Messner and Luisa Morgantini.
    [Show full text]
  • Dushanbe-Kyrgyz Border Road Rehabilitation Project (Phase III)
    Technical Assistance Consultant’s Report Project Number: 37373 (TA 4784) July 2007 Republic of Tajikistan: Dushanbe-Kyrgyz Border Road Rehabilitation Project (Phase III) Prepared by Cardno ACIL-MBK, Australia This consultant’s report does not necessarily reflect the views of ADB or the Government concerned, and ADB and the Government cannot be held liable for its contents. Final Report Volume I Project Number: TA-4784-TAJ Republic of Tajikistan: Dushanbe-Kyrgyz Border Road Rehabilitation Project (Phase III) July 2007 Commercial in Confidence Republic of Tajikistan: TA-4784-TAJ Dushanbe-Kyrgyz Border Road Rehabilitation Project (Phase III) ABBREVIATIONS ADB ASIAN DEVELOPMENT BANK ATSS ADMINISTRATION FOR TRAFFIC SAFETY SUPERVISION UNIT CAR CENTRAL ASIA REPUBLIC CAREC CENTAL ASIA REGIONAL ECONOMIC COOPERATION CIS COMMONWEALTH OF INDEPENDENT STATES EBRD EUROPEAN BANK FOR RECONSTRUCTION & DEVELOPMENT EIRR ECONOMIC INTERNAL RATE OF RETURN EU EUROPEAN UNION FIDIC INTERNATIONAL FEDERATION OF NATIONAL ASSOCIATIONS OF INDEPENDENT CONSULTING ENGINEERS FMA FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT ASSESSMENT FSU FORMER SOVIET UNION GOT GOVERNMENT OF TAJIKISTAN HDI HUMAN DEVELOPMENT INDEX HH HOUSEHOLDS ICB INTERNATIONAL COMPETITIVE BIDDING IEE INITIAL ENVIRONMENTAL EXAMINATION JBIC JAPAN BANK FOR INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION JFPR JAPAN FUND FOR POVERTY REDUCTION MOTC MINISTRY OF TRANSPORT AND COMMUNICATION NCB NATIONAL COMPETITIVE BIDDING NGO NON-GOVERNMENT ORGANISATION OPEC ORGANISATION OF PETROLEUM EXPORTING COUNTRIES PIU PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION UNIT PPTA PROJECT PREPARATORY
    [Show full text]
  • Iran Nuclear Programme: Revisiting the Nuclear Debate
    Journal of Power, Politics & Governance June 2014, Vol. 2, No. 2, pp. 223-227 ISSN: 2372-4919 (Print), 2372-4927 (Online) Copyright © The Author(s). 2014. All Rights Reserved. Published by American Research Institute for Policy Development Iran Nuclear Programme: Revisiting the Nuclear Debate Khurshid Ahmad Mir1 The trajectory of the nuclear program of Iran dates back to the 1950s. The nuclear programme of Iran was assisted by the west in general and the United States of America in particular as part of the Atoms for Peace program (Roe, 2007). The United States and Western European governments continued to support the Iran's nuclear program continued until the 1979 Iranian Revolution. The revolution of 1979 toppled the Shah of Iran (Iran Affairs, 2006). It was 1957 when Iran and The United States of America signed a civil nuclear co-operation agreement. The agreement was signed as a part of the U.S. Atoms for Peace program. As a confidence building measure Iran signed the Partial nuclear test ban treaty (PTBT) on August 9, 1963: and ratified it on December 23, 1963. And more importantly, in July 1968 Iran signed the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) and latter ratified it. Therefore, there was a marriage between the West and Iran and under the Shah regime, Iran initiated a series of motivated nuclear projects that relied on assistance and backing from the United States of America and Europe. The support from the west made it possible for Iran to launch a nuclear programme which presently seems a global concern. The revolution of 1979 in Iran brought a tremendous change in the policies of the Iran.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Research Division Country Profile: Tajikistan, January 2007
    Library of Congress – Federal Research Division Country Profile: Tajikistan, January 2007 COUNTRY PROFILE: TAJIKISTAN January 2007 COUNTRY Formal Name: Republic of Tajikistan (Jumhurii Tojikiston). Short Form: Tajikistan. Term for Citizen(s): Tajikistani(s). Capital: Dushanbe. Other Major Cities: Istravshan, Khujand, Kulob, and Qurghonteppa. Independence: The official date of independence is September 9, 1991, the date on which Tajikistan withdrew from the Soviet Union. Public Holidays: New Year’s Day (January 1), International Women’s Day (March 8), Navruz (Persian New Year, March 20, 21, or 22), International Labor Day (May 1), Victory Day (May 9), Independence Day (September 9), Constitution Day (November 6), and National Reconciliation Day (November 9). Flag: The flag features three horizontal stripes: a wide middle white stripe with narrower red (top) and green stripes. Centered in the white stripe is a golden crown topped by seven gold, five-pointed stars. The red is taken from the flag of the Soviet Union; the green represents agriculture and the white, cotton. The crown and stars represent the Click to Enlarge Image country’s sovereignty and the friendship of nationalities. HISTORICAL BACKGROUND Early History: Iranian peoples such as the Soghdians and the Bactrians are the ethnic forbears of the modern Tajiks. They have inhabited parts of Central Asia for at least 2,500 years, assimilating with Turkic and Mongol groups. Between the sixth and fourth centuries B.C., present-day Tajikistan was part of the Persian Achaemenian Empire, which was conquered by Alexander the Great in the fourth century B.C. After that conquest, Tajikistan was part of the Greco-Bactrian Kingdom, a successor state to Alexander’s empire.
    [Show full text]
  • The Threat of Nuclear Proliferation: Perception and Reality Jacques E
    ROUNDTABLE: NONPROLIFERATION IN THE 21ST CENTURY The Threat of Nuclear Proliferation: Perception and Reality Jacques E. C. Hymans* uclear weapons proliferation is at the top of the news these days. Most recent reports have focused on the nuclear efforts of Iran and North N Korea, but they also typically warn that those two acute diplomatic headaches may merely be the harbingers of a much darker future. Indeed, foreign policy sages often claim that what worries them most is not the small arsenals that Tehran and Pyongyang could build for themselves, but rather the potential that their reckless behavior could catalyze a process of runaway nuclear proliferation, international disorder, and, ultimately, nuclear war. The United States is right to be vigilant against the threat of nuclear prolifer- ation. But such vigilance can all too easily lend itself to exaggeration and overreac- tion, as the invasion of Iraq painfully demonstrates. In this essay, I critique two intellectual assumptions that have contributed mightily to Washington’s puffed-up perceptions of the proliferation threat. I then spell out the policy impli- cations of a more appropriate analysis of that threat. The first standard assumption undergirding the anticipation of rampant pro- liferation is that states that abstain from nuclear weapons are resisting the dictates of their narrow self-interest—and that while this may be a laudable policy, it is also an unsustainable one. According to this line of thinking, sooner or later some external shock, such as an Iranian dash for the bomb, can be expected to jolt many states out of their nuclear self-restraint.
    [Show full text]
  • TAJIKISTAN Transport Sector Masterplan Asian Development Bank
    TAJIKISTAN Transport Sector Masterplan (Done under ADB TA 4926-TAJ) Asian Development Bank 4 November 2009 Dushanbe, Tajikistan 1 InvestmentInvestment Priorities:Priorities: EconomicsEconomics The Masterplan will require commitment to increased annual transport sector funding: For Roads: 1.8% of GDP For Rail: 0.6% of GDP For Civil Aviation: 0.2% of GDP 2 RegionalRegional Context:Context: Asian Highway Network 3 RegionalRegional Context:Context: AsianAsian HighwayHighway NetworkNetwork 4 InvestmentInvestment Priorities:Priorities: FinancialFinancial ConstraintsConstraints –– RoadRoad In the short to medium-term, the rehabilitation programme will need to be financed almost entirely of grants, or concessional loans, from international financing institutions. In the longer term, with dedicated ring-fenced domestic road user charges, funding can increasingly come from domestic sources. 5 InvestmentInvestment Priorities:Priorities: RoadRoad SectorSector iinn thethe shortshort termterm -- nnextext FiveFive YearsYears With 60 to 80% of the present road network described as “unmaintainable”, the needs of the road sector are critical and are as follows. In the short term (next five years) the MoTC should: • concentrate capital expenditure on a programme to work towards completion of the rehabilitation programme for International and Republican Roads – projects; • lobby and obtain from the MoF for a substantial increase in maintenance expenditure: at the same time, improve the efficiency of maintenance work with proper competitive tendering/
    [Show full text]
  • Conflict Between India and Pakistan Roots of Modern Conflict
    Conflict between India and Pakistan Roots of Modern Conflict Conflict between India and Pakistan Peter Lyon Conflict in Afghanistan Ludwig W. Adamec and Frank A. Clements Conflict in the Former Yugoslavia John B. Allcock, Marko Milivojevic, and John J. Horton, editors Conflict in Korea James E. Hoare and Susan Pares Conflict in Northern Ireland Sydney Elliott and W. D. Flackes Conflict between India and Pakistan An Encyclopedia Peter Lyon Santa Barbara, California Denver, Colorado Oxford, England Copyright 2008 by ABC-CLIO, Inc. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, except for the inclusion of brief quotations in a review, without prior permission in writing from the publishers. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Lyon, Peter, 1934– Conflict between India and Pakistan : an encyclopedia / Peter Lyon. p. cm. — (Roots of modern conflict) Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-1-57607-712-2 (hard copy : alk. paper) ISBN 978-1-57607-713-9 (ebook) 1. India—Foreign relations—Pakistan—Encyclopedias. 2. Pakistan-Foreign relations— India—Encyclopedias. 3. India—Politics and government—Encyclopedias. 4. Pakistan— Politics and government—Encyclopedias. I. Title. DS450.P18L86 2008 954.04-dc22 2008022193 12 11 10 9 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Production Editor: Anna A. Moore Production Manager: Don Schmidt Media Editor: Jason Kniser Media Resources Manager: Caroline Price File Management Coordinator: Paula Gerard This book is also available on the World Wide Web as an eBook.
    [Show full text]
  • The Israeli Strategy Vis-À-Vis the Us Foreign Policy in the Iran Nuclear Deal
    ULB- LUISS Double Degree Master’s Degree in International Relations, Major in: Political violence and Security Practices ( ULB) Geopolitical Scenarios and Political risk (LUISS) Master’s dissertation: THE ISRAELI STRATEGY VIS-À-VIS THE US FOREIGN POLICY IN THE IRAN NUCLEAR DEAL SUPERVISORS Prof. Christian Olsson (ULB) Prof. Giuseppe Scognamiglio (LUISS) CANDIDATE Michela Muscau (638382) CO-SUPERVISOR Prof. Gregory Alegi (LUISS) 0 1 Alla mia famiglia, A Davide e a mio Padre, a chi non smette di credere. 2 TABLE OF CONTENT ACKNOWLEDGMENT .......................................................................................................................................................... II ACRONYMS/ LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS. ........................................................................................................................... III SUMMARY. ............................................................................................................................................................................. I INTRODUCTION. .................................................................................................................................................................. 1 THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK: PREMISES AND THEORY. .......................................................................................... 5 METHODOLOGY. ................................................................................................................................................................. 8 OPERATIONAL CONCEPTS.
    [Show full text]
  • Highlights of Iran's Perilous Pursuit of Nuclear Weapons
    INSTITUTE FOR SCIENCE AND INTERNATIONAL SECURITY REPORT Highlights of Iran’s Perilous Pursuit of Nuclear Weapons By David Albright with Sarah Burkhard and the Good ISIS Team August 25, 2021 Iran’s Perilous Pursuit of Nuclear Weapons chronicles the Islamic Republic of Iran’s effort to acquire nuclear weapons. It started slowly, building to a crash nuclear weapons program in the early 2000s to create five nuclear weapons and an industrial complex to produce many more. Under international pressure, fearful of military attack, the program was driven to downsize and deeper secrecy. Nonetheless, Iran remains on the brink of becoming a nuclear weapons power; its nuclear material production capabilities stronger than ever, its weaponization capabilities lurking under the surface. But just how close did Iran get to nuclear weapons during its crash program and how close is it today? Up until the events of a cold, clear night in January 2018, the world could only guess. In a dramatic nighttime raid, the Israeli Foreign Intelligence Service Mossad broke into a warehouse in Tehran and seized a large cache of documents detailing Iran’s darkest and long- denied secret. The Amad Plan, the codename for its crash nuclear weapons program, was far larger and made much more progress than previously known. Containing many top secret details, the seized documents offer unprecedented insights into Iran’s progress—and the hurdles it faced in building nuclear weapons. With what Iran learned about building nuclear weapons during the Amad Plan, combined with its subsequent accomplishments, the Islamic Republic has developed a sophisticated capability to make nuclear weapons.
    [Show full text]
  • Masaryk University, Brno
    MASARYK UNIVERSITY, BRNO Faculty of Social Studies Department of International Relations and European Studies Political influence of Iran in the Middle East after 2003 Bachelor‟s thesis Author: Oleg Kuznetsov (UČO 330969) MVZ-EVS 2013 Supervisor: PhDr. Pavel Pšeja, Ph.D. Brno 2013 I hereby declare that this thesis I submit for assessment is entirely my own work and has not been taken from the work of others save to the extent that such work has been cited and acknowledged within the text of my work. Date: Signature 2 Acknowledgment: As the author of this thesis, first of all I would like to thank my supervisor PhDr. Pavel Pšeja Ph.D. for his patience, help, and advices during writing this work. I would like to acknowledge my family for giving me moral support during writing the thesis. I also would like to acknowledge Ms. Shahira Amin and Rohit Jobanputra for their support, kindness and friendship. 3 Contents Abstract ............................................................................................................................................................... 5 Introduction ........................................................................................................................................................ 6 I) Iran’s overview ................................................................................................................................................. 7 Iran’s political system and overview of the country ......................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION A. Major
    CAREC Corridors 3 and 5 Enhancement Project (RRP TAJ 46543) DEVELOPMENT COORDINATION A. Major Development Partners: Strategic Foci and Key Activities 1. External funds, either from multilateral or from bilateral, have been essential for the development of the Tajikistan transport sector. The Asian Development Bank (ADB) is the lead agency in transport, customs cooperation, and trade facilitation activities of the Central Asia Regional Economic Cooperation (CAREC) program; the People’s Republic of China is the lead investor in the road subsector. Other development partners including the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) Fund for International Development; the Islamic Development Bank; Kuwait Fund for Arab Economic Development; the Aga Khan Foundation; the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development; the Japan International Cooperation Agency; the governments of Japan and Iran, have also been focusing their assistance on the road subsector in Tajikistan. Additionally, the World Bank is planning to finance a road project to commence in/about end of 2013. Major Development Partners in Transport Development Amount Partner Project Name Duration ($ million) ADB Institutional Strengthening of the Transport and Energy Sectors 1998–2004 1.5 Preparing the Road Rehabilitation Project 1999–2004 0.8 Regional Railway Improvement 2000–2001 0.2 Institutional and Policy Support in Road Sector 2000–2006 0.5 Preparing the Second Road Rehabilitation Project 2001–2003 0.6 Strengthening Implementation of Road Maintenance 2003–2008
    [Show full text]
  • Mapping Pakistan's Internal Dynamics
    the national bureau of asian research nbr special report #55 | february 2016 mapping pakistan’s internal dynamics Implications for State Stability and Regional Security By Mumtaz Ahmad, Dipankar Banerjee, Aryaman Bhatnagar, C. Christine Fair, Vanda Felbab-Brown, Husain Haqqani, Mahin Karim, Tariq A. Karim, Vivek Katju, C. Raja Mohan, Matthew J. Nelson, and Jayadeva Ranade cover 2 NBR Board of Directors Charles W. Brady George Davidson Tom Robertson (Chairman) Vice Chairman, M&A, Asia-Pacific Vice President and Chairman Emeritus HSBC Holdings plc Deputy General Counsel Invesco LLC Microsoft Corporation Norman D. Dicks John V. Rindlaub Senior Policy Advisor Gordon Smith (Vice Chairman and Treasurer) Van Ness Feldman LLP Chief Operating Officer President, Asia Pacific Exact Staff, Inc. Wells Fargo Richard J. Ellings President Scott Stoll George F. Russell Jr. NBR Partner (Chairman Emeritus) Ernst & Young LLP Chairman Emeritus R. Michael Gadbaw Russell Investments Distinguished Visiting Fellow David K.Y. Tang Institute of International Economic Law, Managing Partner, Asia Karan Bhatia Georgetown University Law Center K&L Gates LLP Vice President & Senior Counsel International Law & Policy Ryo Kubota Tadataka Yamada General Electric Chairman, President, and CEO Venture Partner Acucela Inc. Frazier Healthcare Dennis Blair Chairman Melody Meyer President Sasakawa Peace Foundation USA Honorary Directors U.S. Navy (Ret.) Chevron Asia Pacific Exploration and Production Company Maria Livanos Cattaui Chevron Corporation Lawrence W. Clarkson Secretary General (Ret.) Senior Vice President International Chamber of Commerce Pamela S. Passman The Boeing Company (Ret.) President and CEO William M. Colton Center for Responsible Enterprise Thomas E. Fisher Vice President and Trade (CREATe) Senior Vice President Corporate Strategic Planning Unocal Corporation (Ret.) Exxon Mobil Corporation C.
    [Show full text]