DOCSLIB.ORG

Environmental Assessment

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Environmental Assessment Environmental Assessment Federal Transit Administratio n TEMPE STREETCAR July 2015 TEMPE STREETCAR ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT Prepared in accordance with: • National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. § 4332 et seq.), as amended • Federal Transit Act (49 U.S.C. § 5301 et seq.), as amended • Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century (MAP-21) (Public Law 112-141) By the: Federal Transit Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, and Valley Metro Lead Agencies: Federal Transit Administration and Valley Metro For additional information concerning this document, contact: Robert Forrest Environmental Program Manager Valley Metro 101 N. 1st Avenue, Suite 1300 Phoenix, AZ 85003 (602) 322-4514 Dominique M. Paukowits Federal Transit Administration, Region IX 201 Mission Street, Suite 1650 San Francisco, CA 94105-1831 (415) 744-2735 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................... ES-1 ES.1 WHAT IS THE TEMPE STREETCAR AND WHERE IS IT LOCATED? .......................................................................................... ES-1 ES.2 WHY WAS THE ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT WRITTEN AND WHAT DOES IT INCLUDE? ........................................................ ES-4 ES.3 WHY IS THE PROJECT NEEDED AND WHAT ISSUES WOULD IT ADDRESS? ..................................................................................... ES-5 ES.4 WHAT ALTERNATIVES HAVE BEEN CONSIDERED AND HOW DID WE GET TO THE PROJECT NOW PROPOSED? ....................... ES-6 ES.5 WOULD THERE BE ANY ADVERSE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS? ........................................................................................... ES-8 ES.6 HOW MUCH WOULD THE PROJECT COST AND HOW WOULD IT BE FUNDED? ................................................................................ ES-19 ES.6.1 Capital Costs Funding Sources ............................................. ES-19 ES.6.2 Operating Costs Funding Sources ........................................ ES-20 1.0 INTRODUCTION AND PURPOSE AND NEED FOR THE PROPOSED PROJECT .......................................................................................................... 1-1 1.1 WHAT IS THE PROPOSED PROJECT AND WHY IS AN ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT BEING PREPARED? ..................... 1-1 1.2 WHY IS HIGH-CAPACITY TRANSIT SERVICE NEEDED IN THE STUDY AREA? ....................................................................................... 1-2 1.2.1 Accommodating the Travel Needs of a Growing Population and Employment Center ............................................................ 1-3 1.2.2 Improving Local and Regional Mobility, Especially during Peak Travel Times ..................................................................... 1-4 1.2.3 Enhancing Access to Regional Employment Centers and Activity Destinations ................................................................... 1-6 1.2.4 Supporting Current and Planned Economic and Transit- Oriented Development in the Project Corridors .......................... 1-6 1.3 WHAT IS THE PURPOSE OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT? ............... 1-8 1.4 WHAT ARE THE GOALS FOR THE PROPOSED PROJECT? .............. 1-9 Environmental Assessment Page i July 2015 Tempe Streetcar 2.0 ALTERNATIVES TO THE PROPOSED PROJECT ........................................... 2-1 2.1 WHAT ALTERNATIVES HAVE BEEN CONSIDERED AND HOW DID WE GET TO THE ALTERNATIVES SELECTED FOR EVALUATION IN THIS EA? .................................................................... 2-1 2.2 WHAT ALTERNATIVES ARE EVALUATED IN THIS EA? ..................... 2-5 2.2.1 No-Build Alternative ................................................................... 2-5 2.2.2 Build Alternative ......................................................................... 2-9 2.3 BUILD ALTERNATIVE TRANSIT NETWORK ...................................... 2-22 3.0 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS—WHAT IMPACTS ARE LIKELY TO OCCUR AND HOW WILL MAJOR ADVERSE IMPACTS BE AVOIDED OR MINIMIZED? ............................................................................................... 3-1 3.1 LAND ACQUISITION AND RELOCATION ............................................. 3-2 3.1.1 Environmental Setting ................................................................ 3-2 3.1.2 No-Build Alternative ................................................................... 3-2 3.1.3 Build Alternative ......................................................................... 3-2 3.1.4 Mitigation.................................................................................... 3-5 3.2 EXISTING LAND USE ............................................................................ 3-6 3.2.1 Environmental Setting ................................................................ 3-6 3.2.2 No-Build Alternative ................................................................... 3-6 3.2.3 Build Alternative ......................................................................... 3-7 3.2.4 Mitigation.................................................................................... 3-7 3.3 CONSISTENCY WITH LOCAL PLANS .................................................. 3-8 3.3.1 Environmental Setting ................................................................ 3-8 3.3.2 No-Build Alternative ................................................................... 3-9 3.3.3 Build Alternative ......................................................................... 3-9 3.3.4 Mitigation.................................................................................... 3-9 3.4 ECONOMIC EFFECTS ........................................................................... 3-9 3.4.1 Environmental Setting ................................................................ 3-9 3.4.2 No-Build Alternative ................................................................. 3-10 3.4.3 Build Alternative ....................................................................... 3-10 3.4.4 Mitigation.................................................................................. 3-12 3.5 GROWTH AND GROWTH-INDUCED IMPACTS ................................. 3-12 3.5.1 Environmental Setting .............................................................. 3-12 3.5.2 No-Build Alternative ................................................................. 3-14 Environmental Assessment Page ii July 2015 Tempe Streetcar 3.5.3 Build Alternative ....................................................................... 3-14 3.5.4 Mitigation.................................................................................. 3-14 3.6 TRAFFIC/PARKING/PEDESTRIANS/BICYCLES/FREIGHT ROUTES/TRANSIT............................................................................... 3-14 3.6.1 Environmental Setting .............................................................. 3-14 3.6.2 No-Build Alternative ................................................................. 3-16 3.6.3 Build Alternative ....................................................................... 3-19 3.6.4 Mitigation.................................................................................. 3-27 3.7 AIR QUALITY AND GREENHOUSE GASES ....................................... 3-27 3.7.1 Environmental Setting .............................................................. 3-27 3.7.2 No-Build Alternative ................................................................. 3-28 3.7.3 Build Alternative ....................................................................... 3-29 3.7.4 Mitigation.................................................................................. 3-32 3.8 NOISE AND VIBRATION ...................................................................... 3-32 3.8.1 Environmental Setting .............................................................. 3-32 3.8.2 No-Build Alternative ................................................................. 3-39 3.8.3 Build Alternative ....................................................................... 3-39 3.8.4 Mitigation.................................................................................. 3-47 3.9 ENERGY REQUIREMENTS AND POTENTIAL FOR CONSERVATION ......................................................................... 3-48 3.9.1 Environmental Setting .............................................................. 3-48 3.9.2 No-Build Alternative ................................................................. 3-50 3.9.3 Build Alternative ....................................................................... 3-50 3.9.4 Mitigation.................................................................................. 3-52 3.10 HISTORIC, ARCHAEOLOGICAL AND CULTURAL PROPERTIES ..... 3-52 3.10.1 Environmental Setting .............................................................. 3-52 3.10.2 No-Build Alternative ................................................................. 3-63 3.10.3 Build Alternative ....................................................................... 3-63 3.10.4 Measures to Minimize and Avoid Effects ................................. 3-67 3.11 SECTION 4(F)/6(F) EVALUATION ....................................................... 3-69 3.11.1 Environmental Setting .............................................................. 3-69 3.11.2 No-Build Alternative ................................................................. 3-72 3.11.3 Build Alternative ....................................................................... 3-72 3.11.4 Measures to Minimize Harm ...................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • FROM BULLDOGS to SUN DEVILS the EARLY YEARS ASU BASEBALL 1907-1958 Year ...Record
    THE TRADITION CONTINUES ASUBASEBALL 2005 2005 SUN DEVIL BASEBALL 2 There comes a time in a little boy’s life when baseball is introduced to him. Thus begins the long journey for those meant to play the game at a higher level, for those who love the game so much they strive to be a part of its history. Sun Devil Baseball! NCAA NATIONAL CHAMPIONS: 1965, 1967, 1969, 1977, 1981 2005 SUN DEVIL BASEBALL 3 ASU AND THE GOLDEN SPIKES AWARD > For the past 26 years, USA Baseball has honored the top amateur baseball player in the country with the Golden Spikes Award. (See winners box.) The award is presented each year to the player who exhibits exceptional athletic ability and exemplary sportsmanship. Past winners of this prestigious award include current Major League Baseball stars J. D. Drew, Pat Burrell, Jason Varitek, Jason Jennings and Mark Prior. > Arizona State’s Bob Horner won the inaugural award in 1978 after hitting .412 with 20 doubles and 25 RBI. Oddibe McDowell (1984) and Mike Kelly (1991) also won the award. > Dustin Pedroia was named one of five finalists for the 2004 Golden Spikes Award. He became the seventh all-time final- ist from ASU, including Horner (1978), McDowell (1984), Kelly (1990), Kelly (1991), Paul Lo Duca (1993) and Jacob Cruz (1994). ODDIBE MCDOWELL > With three Golden Spikes winners, ASU ranks tied for first with Florida State and Cal State Fullerton as the schools with the most players to have earned college baseball’s top honor. BOB HORNER GOLDEN SPIKES AWARD WINNERS 2004 Jered Weaver Long Beach State 2003 Rickie Weeks Southern 2002 Khalil Greene Clemson 2001 Mark Prior Southern California 2000 Kip Bouknight South Carolina 1999 Jason Jennings Baylor 1998 Pat Burrell Miami 1997 J.D.
    [Show full text]
  • OH-279 NARRATOR: James Yeater INTERVIEWER: Aaron Monson DATE: July 1, 2008
    TEMPE HISTORICAL MUSEUM ORAL HISTORY PROJECT INTERVIEW #: OH-279 NARRATOR: James Yeater INTERVIEWER: Aaron Monson DATE: July 1, 2008 JY = James Yeater INT = Interviewer _______ = Unintelligible (Italics) = Transcriber’s notes Side A INT: Today is July 1, 2008. This is the Tempe Historical Museum’s renovation interview with James Yeater, former Theater department head at Arizona State University. Let’s begin. Can you tell me please when you first came to ASU, and what made you choose ASU as an employer? JY: I came in 1958. At that time, I had two choices, I guess. One with a college in northern Michigan, almost to Canada, and the other one was Arizona State College. No particular choice too much, but it seemed like climate-wise, this would be a little better choice. It also seemed . In those days, we did not have interviews. You didn’t go to the campus to be interviewed. You were lucky to get a phone call and learn a little bit about it. And the Theater program here seemed rather similar to one I had had as an undergraduate; that is, with about four or five courses, and it was still called Drama then rather than Theater, and with doing plays with the student body as a whole rather than a part of any professionally-developed system. I was familiar with that, so it seemed like a good choice. But I guess, basically, it was sort of an opportunity. INT: Can you tell me just a little bit about what brought you into the drama and theater career path? What initially sparked your interest in it? JY: Actually, I think I started out in other things, but began to—I’m sure this is the common pattern of many—began to work, to be in plays and dramatic presentations and debate and so forth.
    [Show full text]
  • Marginalia Spring 08.Indd
    THE MAGAZINE OF THE PIPER CENTER FOR CREATIVE WRITING | COLLEGE OF LIBERAL ARTS AND SCIENCES ON PLACE WRITERS IN THE WORLD AIMEE NEZHUKUMATATHIL ON THIS WRITER’S LIFE PREVIEW: 2008 WRITERS CONFERENCE PROFILES OF LOUISE GLÜCK C.D. WRIGHT SPECIAL REPORT: MFA STUDENTS VISIT CHINA ALSOINSIDE DENISEDUHAMEL | DINTYWMOORE | LAURATOHE IN THIS ISSUE VOL 3, ISS 1 SPRING 2008 FEATURES EDITOR CONVERGING VOICES ..............................................................................................................4 Beth Staples Brian Diamond previews the 2008 Desert Nights, Rising Stars converence. COPYEDITOR DISCOVERING “MANY INDIAS” ..............................................................................................6 Veronica Lucero Liz Wimberly reflects on her trip to India. CONTRIBUTORS THE REAL WORLD ....................................................................................................................9 Aimée Baker Dinty W. Moore Charles Jensen explains why the work of Louise Glück matters. Matthew Brennan Aimee Nezhukumatathil Katie Cortese Arijit Sen Denise Duhamel AREA CODE ............................................................................................................................ 11 Leah Soderburg Robby Taylor considers what it means to write from the Southwest. Brian Diamond Rose Swartz Charles Jensen Robby Taylor Brian Lee Dinh Vong CREATIVE WRITING GOES TO CHINA .................................................................................. 17 Beth Staples travels from Tempe to Tibet. Nadine
    [Show full text]
  • Your Future Campus
    Published October 2016. XX. Photo credit: Scott Troyanos. 2694 Troyanos. Scott credit: Photo XX. 2016. October Published alternative formats, contact Admission Services at 480-965-7788 or fax 480-965-3610. 480-965-3610. fax or 480-965-7788 at Services Admission contact formats, alternative Information is subject to change. © 2014 ABOR for ASU. To request this publication in in publication this request To ASU. for ABOR 2014 © change. to subject is Information @FutureSunDevils @FutureSunDevils instagram.com download the ASU app ASU the download @FutureSunDevils /FutureSunDevils twitter.com facebook.com Connect with us: us: with Connect Tempe campus | Self-guided tour Self-guided | campus Tempe asu.edu/apply asu.edu/mydegree campus Apply for admission admission for Apply degrees Explore Sun Devil journey journey Devil Sun future Your Take the next step on your your on step next the Take Join us Join ASU has emerged as a leader in higher education. Nationally recognized by The Wall Street Journal for preparing the most-qualified college graduates, it consistently ranks as the top ASU rankings school in Arizona for innovation, affordability, quality of students and academic programs. title source AZ ranking U.S. ranking best bang for the buck Washington Monthly 1 24 best-qualified graduates The Wall Street Journal 1 5 top scholars Fulbright Scholar Awards 1 5 most innovative U.S. News & World Report 1 1 public good Washington Monthly 1 34 best colleges for the money Fox Business 1 Top 10 international choice Institute of International Education 1 4 best graduate education school U.S. News & World Report 1 14 best colleges for veterans College Factual 1 2 1st St Welcome to Arizona State University’se Tempe campus v A Rio Salado Pwky Maple 2nd St 1 College Ave.
    [Show full text]
  • Capital Improvement Plan 2018-2020 FISCAL YEARS 2018-2020 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN
    Capital Improvement Plan 2018-2020 FISCAL YEARS 2018-2020 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN SUBMITTED FOR APPROVAL BY THE ARIZONA BOARD OF REGENTS SEPTEMBER 2016 Dear Members of the Arizona Board of Regents: On behalf of Arizona State University, I am pleased to present the ASU FY 2018-2020 Capital Improvement Plan (CIP). ASU continues to make meaningful progress in its evolution as a model for 21st century higher education, dedicated to access, excellence and impact. In keeping with the ambitious trajectory reflected in the ASU Strategic Enterprise Framework and the ASU Campus Master Plan, the projects proposed in this CIP focus on addressing the need for sustainable facilities that support the achievement of our institutional objectives. For this CIP, ASU has set as an FY 2018 priority a new, energy-efficient parking structure that will be located adjacent to the core of the Tempe campus and downtown Tempe. The multi-tiered structure will replace existing surface parking that will be displaced by planned new development on this site. This project is intended to provide students, faculty and staff with a high-quality facility that will enable their success and support the key elements of ASU’S Strategic Enterprise Framework, including: - Achieving a 57 percent increase in degree production - Establishing national standing in academic quality and the impact of colleges and schools in every field - Enhancing local impact and social embeddedness - Expanding research performance to $815 million in annual research expenditures by 2025 Details regarding this proposed project can be found in the Three-Year Capital Improvement Plan and the FY 2018 Project Description tab.
    [Show full text]
  • Historic Properties Treatment Plan for Monitoring and Phased Data
    Historic Properties Treatment Plan for Monitoring and Phased Data Recovery at AZ U:9:165(ASM) for the 8th Street Multi-use Path and Streetscape Improvements (Rural Road to McClintock Drive), Tempe, Maricopa County, Arizona Prepared for: City of Tempe Prepared by: Sara C. Ferland Submitted by: Mark Hackbarth, M.A., RPA 51 West Third Street, Suite 450 Tempe, AZ 85281 April 2018 (Submittal 2) Logan Simpson Technical Report No. 175186b ABSTRACT AND MANAGEMENT SUMMARY Report Title Historic Properties Treatment Plan for Monitoring and Phased Data Recovery at AZ U:9:165(ASM) for the 8th Street Multi-use Path and Streetscape Improvements (Rural Road to McClintock Drive), Tempe, Maricopa County, Arizona Report Date April 4, 2018 (Submittal 2) Agencies Involved Federal Highways Administration (FHWA), Arizona Department of Transportation (ADOT), State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO), Arizona State Museum (ASM), City of Tempe (COT) Land Ownership COT Funding Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement Program though the FHWA ASM Permits Arizona Antiquities Act project-specific permit (to be obtained) Burial Agreement, in accordance with A.R.S. §41-844 (to be obtained) Repository A Curation Agreement will be obtained from the Tempe History Museum Logan Simpson 175186 Project No. Project Description The COT, in conjunction with the ADOT and FHWA, is planning to construct a multi-use path (MUP) and streetscape improvement project along 8th Street between Rural Road and McClintock Drive in Tempe. The area of potential effects (APE) consists of approximately one mile of the existing 73.0 ft to 90.5 ft. This includes the COT-owned property on the north side of 8th Street from Rural Road to Dorsey Lane (a former railroad ROW measuring 33 feet wide by 2,640 feet long), and a Salt River Project easement at the southeast corner of 8th Street and Rural Road.
    [Show full text]
  • Joseph Wytko Saxophone Quartet Joseph Wytko Chapman University
    Chapman University Chapman University Digital Commons Printed Performance Programs (PDF Format) Music Performances 9-28-2010 Joseph Wytko Saxophone Quartet Joseph Wytko Chapman University Anna Marie Wytko Chapman University Matthew aP tnode Chapman University Kevin Gorman Chapman University Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.chapman.edu/music_programs Recommended Citation Wytko, Joseph; Wytko, Anna Marie; Patnode, Matthew; and Gorman, Kevin, "Joseph Wytko Saxophone Quartet" (2010). Printed Performance Programs (PDF Format). Paper 613. http://digitalcommons.chapman.edu/music_programs/613 This Guest Recital is brought to you for free and open access by the Music Performances at Chapman University Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Printed Performance Programs (PDF Format) by an authorized administrator of Chapman University Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. •• CHAPMAN•• UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF PERFORMING ARTS CHAPMAN UNIVERSITY Fall 2010 Event Highlights Conservatory ofMusic THEATRE: Godspell by Stephen Schwartz and John-Michael Tebelak ... Sept. 30-0ct. 2, 6-9 presents the If All the Sky Were Paper (World Premiere) by Andrew Carroll.............................................................. Nov. 11-13, 18-20 MUSIC: Chapman University Wind Symphony................................................. Oct. 16 Opera Chapman presents: "If Music Be the Food of Love" ...... Oct. 22-31 JOSEPH WYTKO SAXOPHONE QUARTET University Chofrs in Concert ................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Desert Aesthetic of Frank Lloyd Wright: a Comparison of Taliesin West and Grady Gammage Auditorium
    1 The Desert Aesthetic of Frank Lloyd Wright: A Comparison of Taliesin West and Grady Gammage Auditorium The city of Phoenix Arizona is famously named for the legendary bird that died and was regenerated from its ashes. It is here that Frank Lloyd Wright traveled in February 1928 to assist in the planning of the Biltmore Hotel. Already Wright’s life seemed to parallel the myth of the Phoenix with its tale of fiery death followed by glorious rebirth. In 1914 Wright had endured the destruction by fire of his Wisconsin residence, Taliesin, and the murder of his companion and her children during that same disastrous event. He had weathered a failed first marriage, social ostracism brought on by his subsequent affair with his client ((Mamah Borthwick, the murder victim), another fire in 1925, and professional and financial setbacks. Yet, at over sixty years of age, newly married to a woman thirty years younger than himself, he would begin his encounter with the Arizona desert, a love affair that, like that with Olgivanna, would last the rest of his life. It took ten years for Wright to establish roots near Phoenix and he did so just in time to witness its transformation from a sleepy farming center surrounded by pristine desert to the burgeoning metropolis it showed signs of becoming by the time he died in 1959. When Wright first visited in late 1928, Phoenix had a population of just under 50,000 inhabitants. By 1960, that number had more than doubled and Phoenix was well on its way to status as a major American city.
    [Show full text]
  • April 19, 2017 REQUEST for PROPOSAL UNARMED
    April 19, 2017 REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL UNARMED SECURITY GUARD SERVICES RFP 341707 DUE: 3:00 P.M., MST, 05/12/17 Time and Date of Pre-Proposal Conference 8:30 A.M., MST, 04/24/17 Deadline for Inquiries 5:00 P.M., MST, 04/28/17 Time and Date Set for Closing 3:00 P.M., MST, 05/12/17 TABLE OF CONTENTS TITLE PAGE SECTION I – REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL .................................................................... 4 SECTION II – PURPOSE OF THE RFP .......................................................................... 5 SECTION III – PRE-PROPOSAL CONFERENCE .......................................................... 9 SECTION IV – INSTRUCTIONS TO PROPOSERS ...................................................... 10 SECTION V – SPECIFICATIONS/SCOPE OF WORK .................................................. 17 SECTION VII – PROPOSER QUALIFICATIONS .......................................................... 26 SECTION VIII – EVALUATION CRITERIA ................................................................... 28 SECTION IX – PRICING SCHEDULE ........................................................................... 29 SECTION X – FORM OF PROPOSAL/SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS ............................. 31 SECTION XI – PROPOSER INQUIRY FORM ............................................................... 32 SECTION XII – TERMS & CONDITIONS ...................................................................... 33 SECTION XIII – MANDATORY CERTIFICATIONS ...................................................... 44 APPENDIX A - ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY POLICE
    [Show full text]
  • Arizona State University Is One of the Premier Metropolitan Public Research Universities in the Nation
    AArizonarizona StateState UniversityUniversity AArizonarizona StateState UniversityUniversity Arizona State University is one of the premier metropolitan public research universities in the nation. Enrolling more than 57,000 undergradu- ate, graduate, and professional students on four campuses in metropolitan Phoenix, ASU main- tains a tradition of academic excellence in core disciplines, and has become an important global center for innovative interdisciplinary teaching and research. Arizona State offers outstanding resources for study and research, including libraries and museums with important collec- tions, studios and performing arts spaces for creative endeavor, and unsurpassed state-of-the- art scientific and technological laboratories and research facilities. In addition to the historic campus in Tempe, a college town in the midst of a dynamic metropoli- tan region, the university comprises two newer campuses with more specialized missions: ASU’s West campus, in northwest Phoenix adjacent to Glendale, and ASU’s Polytechnic campus, in Mesa. The conceptualization and design of a new Downtown Phoenix campus is presently under- way, with plans for a vibrant cultural, creative and education center. The vision for an expanded ACADEMIC HIGHLIGHTS AT ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY ASU presence in Downtown Phoenix is part of an ongoing comprehensive development planning • ASU is a Doctoral/Research-Extensive I Institution, the highest distinction 0f the prestigious Carnegie • ASU ranks fourth among public universities in process that will involve detailed analysis of all of Foundation classification system. the US in the number of freshman National Merit Scholars enrolling last year (162). There are • ASU's Tempe campus offers more than 100 currently 482 National Merit Scholars currently majors through eight colleges and schools, 94 studying at ASU.
    [Show full text]
  • Arizona Board of Regents Past President, Navajo Nation Olympian, Track & Field Security and Non-Proliferation, U.S
    ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY Arizona State University is one of the premier metro- politan public research universities in the nation. Enrolling more than 64,000 undergraduate, graduate, and profes- sional students on four campuses in metropolitan Phoenix, ASU maintains a tradition of academic excellence in core disciplines, and has become an important global center for innovative interdisciplinary teaching and research. Arizona State offers outstanding resources for study and research, including libraries and museums with important collections, studios and performing arts spaces for creative endeavor, and unsurpassed state-of-the-art scientific and technological laboratories and research facilities. ASU’s historic campus in Tempe, which serves more than 51,000 students, offers the feel of a college town in the midst of a dynamic metropolitan region. The West campus, in northwest Phoenix, and Polytechnic campus, in Mesa, which each serve more than 8,500 students, offer more specialized missions. The Downtown Phoenix campus opened in fall 2006 as part of a larger plan to revitalize the city’s urban core. Nestled in the heart of downtown Phoenix, the campus provides an academically rigorous university experience in a modern, urban atmosphere. The campus serves more than 6,500 students and is expected to ultimately grow to 15,000 by 2020. ASU is research-driven but focused on learning – the United States. ASU has the most undergraduates (11) The university is international in scope, welcoming teaching is carried out in a context that encourages the named to USA Today’s Academic First Team of any public students from all 50 states and nations across the globe, creation of new knowledge.
    [Show full text]
  • Arizona Centennial Legacy Projects
    Arizona Centennial Legacy Projects What is a Legacy Project? An Arizona Centennial Legacy Project accurately portrays a significant aspect of Arizona history, is educational and lasting. 100 Years 100 Ranchers Project Number: AHAC09-09 Type: State Budget: $217,264 Website: http://www.100years100ranchers.com/ This black and white photographic project will document 100 Arizona ranchers whose families have been ranching in the state in 1912 or earlier. Each rancher will be interviewed to obtain information about the family's history and their ranch operations. The culmination of the project will coincide with the Arizona Centennial in 2012. An exhibit is tentatively scheduled to open in January 2012 at the Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport Terminal Four Gallery. In addition, a limited edition fine-art book and a short documentary film are planned. 100 Years of Arizona Press Women Project Number: AHAC08-09 Type: State Budget: $60,000 Website: http://www.azpw.org/ This history book, presented as a book of short stories, will be written to capture the emotions of the people and times in which they lived. Each story, researched and written by current members of the Arizona Press Women (APW) organization, will chronicle the contribution of a woman in Arizona who made a significant contribution to the history of the state through her writing. 100 Years of Arizona Sports Project Number: AHAC48-11 Type: State Budget: $198,126 Website: http://www.phoenixsports.org/ 1 The Phoenix Regional Sports Commission is embarking on a publication that will celebrate the history of Arizona sports. Authored by several influential contributors in Arizona, the "100 Years of Arizona Sports" is dedicated to athletes in the Grand Canyon State.
    [Show full text]