DOCSLIB.ORG

Saving Darwin PDF Book

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Saving Darwin PDF Book SAVING DARWIN PDF, EPUB, EBOOK Karl W. Giberson | 258 pages | 02 Jun 2009 | HarperCollins Publishers Inc | 9780061441738 | English | New York, United States Saving Darwin PDF Book Look at how the argument has unfolded. He displays the wry wit of a seasoned polemicist,"Salon. You can edit the text in this area, and change where the contact form on the right submits to, by entering edit mode using the modes on the bottom right. Implementing Louisiana's Anti-Evolution Law. Enlarge cover. Understanding and Using the Bible [Fortress Press, ]. Review: Evolutionary Creation. So I must reject the subtle gibe at falsifiability. More often than not, both camps see the other as "the enemy. In the chapter just preceding, he did offer a negative slant on falsifiability, that recent yardstick of scientific legitimacy. Actually, for the most part the book explains how some fundamentalist Christians mostly young earth creationists came to be in irreconcilable conflict with the idea of evolution, and why young earth creationism cannot stand up scientifically and logically to much of modern science, including biology, genetics and g In Saving Darwin, Karl Giberson, a practicing Christian who believes evolution is true, tries to explain how the two can be reconciled. To be fair, I am tempted to rate this book lower, primarily because it was lazy about it's subtitle -- and I'm a stickler for titles and subtitles. Make a Donation Today. Wonderful book examining the conflict between evolution and creationism. The letters section? Yikes, this book rattles my cage like few others on this subject. I spent an evening reading and skimming a lot and found it to be an very interesting history on the development of different creationism vs. Actually, for the most part the book explains how some fundamentalist Christians mostly young earth creationists came to be in irreconcilable conflict with the idea of evolution, and why young earth creationism cannot stand up scientifically and logically to much of modern science, including biology, genetics and geology. Science Champions Society. He offers a sympathetic historical analysis laced with trenchant criticism of both misguided intelligent design advocates and hard core atheists. Giberson correctly points out that the vicious character of nature as seen with the Ichneumonidae and personal tragedies like the death of his beloved ten-year-old daughter Annie were powerful factors leading Darwin away from theism and Christianity. His recent book Saving Darwin will enjoy a wide readership, and it will certainly challenge many, raising important questions about how science and Christianity are to be related. Karl Giberson is a prominent figure in the modern dialog between science and religion. By: Karl Giberson. Creation science has had an unfortunate legal and political history. Donate Our Work We support teachers. Aug 18, Jaime rated it liked it Shelves: non- fiction. Wishlist Wishlist. Having experienced such a conversation and given his background in science and teaching upon science and religion, the author is well motivated and fairly qualified to write Karl W. That is only to say this book surprised me. Readers also enjoyed. Giberson is actually a good writer, and the whole thing is put together quite well. The book features a lively and witty writing style, and in particular, it is very personal. This is a wonderfully readable book: humane, modest, and wise. Ask a Question What would you like to know about this product? It never really lived up to the promise of its subtitle, "How to be a Christian and Believe in Evolution. Saving Darwin Writer Media Center. And, in this case, the bulk of the book digs into the conflict between the two worldviews. Evolution Is Not the Bible's Enemy. Still reading. Basically it seems more intellectually honest for a religious person to reject evolution than to embrace it. Need a Speaker? If you want smart commentary on the culture wars, this will keep you flipping pages. It does not pass judgment on whether the history it describes was good or bad, just as a video passes no judgment on the event it captures. This version might differ slightly from the print publication. Scientist Karl Giberson believes you can. We support teachers How it Works. I find problems with ID, and of course so does Giberson, but at the same time, it's hard to absolutely refute some of their claims. DIYSci Activities. Too many pages are devoted to explaining and defending evolution instead of the book's stated purpose of reconciling evolution and Christianity. A more appropriate, yet mushier, subtitle might have been "How to believe in God and evolution". Dec 27, Rob Carmack rated it liked it. Books by Karl W. Immersive Science Experiences. Giberson's book is broadly organized in a manner such that the majority and middle sections of the book cover subjects in the history of the creationist movement and responses by those seeking to affirm evolution. After reading this, I'm r Written from the point of view of a biology professor who went to and has taught at fundmentalist Christian schools, this is geared more toward folks of that bent, as opposed to lapsed Catholics like me, who have never bought into any of the creationist mumbo jumbo that conservative anti-intellectuals like to embrace. Our Impact. The letters section? Give a Gift Membership. With that being said, I think the author did a great job of detailing the his Overall, I was somewhat disappointed with this book, as the title and subtitle were quite misleading regarding the book's contents. Review: Back to Darwin. Aug 05, Elizabeth marked it as to-read Shelves: science- and-medicine , religion. Raised a fundamentalist and influenced as a boy by Henry Morris's creationist classic The Genesis Flood , Giberson firmly believed in creationism through his college years. I recommend this book to everyone who cares about this topic. Saving Darwin boasts endorsements from such eminent scientists as Collins and John Pokinghorn as well as well-respected historians of science, Ronald Numbers and Owen Gingerich. The book also gives a nice history of the American view of this issue, from the publication of Darwin's book, to the Scopes trial, and after. Yet he does not conceal his frustration—on theological as well as scientific grounds—with the rubbish of scientific creationism, which has climbed onto the radar screens of American intellectual culture only as a bad joke. Giberson points to a survey that reveals "over half the population of the United States accepts the biblical creation story," and then attempts to deal with this problem by stating that "this position is thoroughly at odds with almost all relevant scholarship of the past century" p 6, his emphasis. Saving Darwin Reviews Indeed, in many ways, Karl Giberson is Charles Darwin. The book features a lively and witty writing style, and in particular, it is very personal. The bad news is the book is very light on the science its a decent overview for the scientifically illiterate that goes over the basics and even lighter on hermeneutics and philosophy. Free Memberships for Graduate Students. What was "The Fall"? Jan 19, Kdearden rated it liked it. It is hard to imagine this too won't be mown out from under him soon enough. He's not the villain that creationists make him out to be. Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read. In the chapter just preceding, he did offer a negative slant on falsifiability, that recent yardstick of scientific legitimacy. Perhaps oddly, I think he deserves great credit for an honest and forthright approach. If Giberson had started his book with this quote, instead of waiting until fifty pages from the end to bring up this idea, I think this book would ha ". This subject is so fraught with emotional investment. Member Services FAQs. It's a very "real" book in that respect, as in, Giberson gives, I think, a realistic account of how he's wre Overall I think this is a good book. Giberson has an incredibly readable style, but most of his book is taken up with background on this history of evolution and the tension between Christianity and evolution. Yikes, this book rattles my cage like few others on this subject. Thanks for telling us about the problem. The "wondrous universe" and "wonderful contrivances for certain purposes in nature" led Darwin to fluctuate from his agnosticism late in life back to deistic, and maybe even theistic, moments Barlow 92—3; Darwin 1: , Absolut As I browsed the library shelves, this book stood out to me. To understand means to say "it works like this, and so Near the end of the book, he makes a short but convincing case for the theory of biological evolution, summarizing the evidence from the fossil record, biogeography, comparative anatomy, developmental similarities and genetics. Saving Darwin Read Online Perhaps oddly, I think he deserves great credit for an honest and forthright approach. His thoughts are still interesting, just inadequate, so in another respect, uninteresting. Nevertheless, despite its many strengths, the faults to be identified within its pages are many. The book is thorough in detailing the development of the young earth creationist movement in America over the past century. Still scorched earth. Our History. As far as I am concerned, this categorical differentiation is absolutely essential in moving beyond the so-called evolution versus creationism debate. Have a question about this product? Reinventing Liberal Christianity. This is a book that many will find helpful. Actually, for the most part the book explains how some fundamentalist Christians mostly young earth creationists came to be in irreconcilable conflict with the idea of evolution, and why young earth creationism cannot stand up scientifically and logically to much of modern science, including biology, genetics and g In Saving Darwin, Karl Giberson, a practicing Christian who believes evolution is true, tries to explain how the two can be reconciled.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Ron Numbers Collection-- the Creationists
    Register of the Ron Numbers Collection-- The Creationists Collection 178 Center for Adventist Research James White Library Andrews University Berrien Springs, Michigan 49104-1400 1992, revised 2007 Ron Numbers Collection--The Creationists (Collection 178) Scope and Content This collection contains the records used as resource material for the production of Dr. Numbers' book, The Creationists, published in 1992. This book documents the development of the creationist movement in the face of the growing tide of evolution. The bulk of the collection dates from the 20th century and covers most of the prominent, individual creationists and pro-creation groups of the late 19th and 20th century primarily in the United States, and secondarily, those in England, Australia, and Canada. Among the types of records included are photocopies of articles and other publications, theses, interview tapes and transcripts, and official publications of various denominations. One of the more valuable contributions of this collection is the large quantity of correspondence of prominent individuals. These records are all photocopies. A large section contains documentation related to Seventh-day Adventist creationists. Adventists were some of the leading figures in the creationist movement, and foremost among this group is George McCready Price. The Adventist Heritage Center holds a Price collection. The Numbers collection contributes additional correspondence and other documentation related to Price. Arrangement Ron Numbers organized this collection for the purpose of preparing his book manuscript, though the book itself is not organized in this way. Dr. Numbers suggested his original arrangement be retained. While the collection is arranged in its original order, the outline that follows may be of help to some researchers.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Big History, the Big Bang, and the Big Book: the History of Science
    Big History, the Big Bang, and the Big Book: The History of Science Meets the Tradition of Christianity Course Context In the 1980s, historian David Christian embarked on a delightfully daring journey: to narrate the entire history of the world from its origins to the present. Ignoring the sacred cow of academic specialization, in which academics are only encouraged to speak about their immediate areas of intellectual concentration, Christian coined the term “Big History” to refer to the history of the cosmos in all of its fourteen-billion years of glory. Even though he was an Australian historian of Russia, with little formal training in science, Christian began teaching history in a way that no one had quite done before. As David Christian was attempting to understand the evolution of history across fourteen billion years, many conservative Christians were actively vilifying the consensus of scientists when it came to the age of the universe, the age of earth, and the origins of human life. Kenneth Ham, an Australian like David Christian who is also around the same age, is at the forefront of creationist apologetics. Ham founded the Creation Museum and he is president of a highly influential organization that teaches young-earth creationism and rejects the methodologies and assumptions of mainstream science. Who is right, David Christian or Ken Ham? And what difference does it make anyway? Course Description In Big History, the Big Bang, and the Big Book, we will explore the intersection between the history of mainstream science and the beliefs of evangelical Christianity. As we look at each of the major branches of science, we will do so with an eye toward understanding how it impacts the thought and practice of Protestant evangelicalism.
    [Show full text]
  • CV Current Online 1
    Curriculum Vitae Peter Harrison Institute for Advanced Studies in the Humanities! Forgan-Smith Building, Level 5 The University of Queensland Qld 4072 Australia Email. [email protected] Qualifications ______________________________________________________________________ DLitt 2013 University of Oxford MA 2007 University of Oxford PhD 1989 University of Queensland MA 1985 Yale University BA 1983 University of Queensland (1st Class Hons) Dip Ed 1977 University of Queensland BSc 1976 University of Queensland Career History ______________________________________________________________________ Director, Institute for Advanced Studies in the Humanities, University of Queensland, 2015- Australian Laureate Fellow, 2015-19 Research Professor and Director, Centre for the History of European Discourses, University of Queensland, 2011-15 Senior Research Fellow, Ian Ramsey Centre, University of Oxford, 2011- Andreas Idreos Professor of Science and Religion; Director of the Ian Ramsey Centre, Fellow of Harris Manchester College, University of Oxford, 2007-11 Assistant Professor/Associate Professor/Professor of History and Philosophy, Bond University, 1989-2006 Fellowships and Honours ______________________________________________________________________ • Bampton Lecturer (Oxford), 2019 • Corresponding member, International Academy of the History of Science • Aldersgate Prize, 2015, for The Territories of Science and Religion. • Australian Laureate Fellow, 2015-19 • Gifford Lecturer (Edinburgh),’Science, Religion and Modernity’, 6 Lectures, 2010-11 • Christ Church, Oxford. Fowler Hamilton Visiting Fellowship. 2007 (declined) • Institute for Advanced Study, Princeton, NJ. Elizabeth and J. Richardson Dilworth Fellowship, January–August, 2005 • Bruce Mansfield Prize (Religious History) 2005 • Vice-Chancellor’s Award (Research Excellence), 2004 • Centenary Medal. Australian Honours, General List, ‘For Service to Australian Society and the Humanities in the Study of Philosophy and Religion’. 2003 • Foundation member, International Society for Science and Religion.
    [Show full text]
  • Study Guide for “Science & Religion”
    STUDY GUIDE: HAVE SCIENCE AND RELIGION ALWAYS BEEN AT WAR? THE DRAPER-WHITE THESIS By Dr. Joshua M. Moritz VIDEO SUMMARY: There is a popular conception that the historical relationship between science and religion has always been one of conflict or even all-out warfare. Historians of science call this the “conflict thesis.” In this video, historians of science Dr. Lawrence Principe and Dr. Edward Davis examine the historical roots and social context of the conflict thesis. Principe and Davis explain that the conflict thesis can be traced primarily to the popular works of two 19th century Americans: John William Draper and Andrew Dickson White. Principe and Davis argue that Draper and White’s use of the language of “conflict” and “warfare” falls far short of the historical reality. Nevertheless, the popularity of these two works and the global influence of these two works still inform current views of how science and religion intersect. CONTRIBUTORS Dr. Lawrence M. Principe is the Drew Professor of the Humanities at Johns Hopkins University in the Department of History of Science and Technology and the Department of Chemistry. He is author of The Scientific Revolution: A Very Short Introduction (Oxford University Press, 2011). Dr. Edward (Ted) Davis is Professor of the History of Science at Messiah College in Mechanicsburg, PA. He is co-editor (with Michael Hunter) of The Works of Robert Boyle (Taylor & Francis, 2000). DISCUSSION QUESTIONS In this film, historian of science Dr. Lawrence Principe and Dr. Ted Davis explain that Draper and White’s views were rooted in the social and political movements of the time.
    [Show full text]
  • How Supporters of Evolution Encourage Violations of the Establishment Clause
    ZEAL FOR DARWIN’S HOUSE CONSUMES THEM: HOW SUPPORTERS OF EVOLUTION ENCOURAGE VIOLATIONS OF THE ESTABLISHMENT CLAUSE Casey Luskin† I. INTRODUCTION The common stereotype in the controversy over teaching evolution holds that it is the opponents of evolution who are constantly trying to “sneak religious dogma back into science education.”1 While perhaps in some instances this caricature is not entirely undeserved,2 the mainstream media and legal community pay scant attention to incidents where proponents of Darwinian evolution transgress the boundary between church and state erected by the Establishment Clause. By documenting ways that evolution advocates encourage violations of the Establishment Clause—in some instances, explicitly advocating state endorsement of pro-evolution religious viewpoints in the science classroom—this Article will show the impropriety of the common “Inherit the Wind stereotype.”3 To be sure, one area where proponents of evolution do not violate the Establishment Clause is in the mere fact that public schools teach the scientific evidence supporting neo-Darwinian evolution (evolution).4 In the foundational 1968 case Epperson v. Arkansas, not only did the U.S. Supreme Court plainly rule under the presumption that teaching evolution is † Casey Luskin, M.S., J.D., Esq. is Program Officer in Public Policy and Legal Affairs for the Discovery Institute. As an attorney with a graduate science background, he has published in GEOCHEMISTRY, GEOPHYSICS, AND GEOSYSTEMS; PROGRESS IN COMPLEXITY, INFORMATION AND DESIGN; RESEARCH NEWS AND OPPORTUNITIES IN SCIENCE AND THEOLOGY; JOURNAL OF CHURCH AND STATE; MONTANA LAW REVIEW; HAMLINE LAW REVIEW; and THE PRAEGER HANDBOOK OF RELIGION AND EDUCATION IN THE UNITED STATES (James C.
    [Show full text]
  • Science and Technology in Historical Perspective (2017‐2018, SEM 1)
    HH1004: Science and Technology in Historical Perspective (2017‐2018, SEM 1) Instructor & Tutor: Asst Prof Park Hyung Wook ([email protected]) / 6592‐3565 / HSS‐05‐14 Learning Objective: This is a thematic survey in the history of science and technology, focusing on the modern period after the seventeenth century. Students are expected to explore diverse historical problems in science and technology in the global and local contexts. Through this course, students will understand the importance of science and technology in creating modernity in both Western and Asian societies. In particular, students in the humanities and social sciences will be able to understand that science and technology are not on the opposite side of the world of emotions, entertainments, and cultures. They will see that science and technology are for ordinary citizens, who need to be actively engaged in constructing, interpreting, and using science and technology. Course Structure: 2 Hour Weekly Lecture + 1 Hour Weekly Tutorial Assignment and Evaluation: Lecture Attendance and Quiz (15%) Lecture Participation (5%) Midterm Essay (15%) Tutorial Activity (15%) Final Exam (50%) Lecture and Tutorial Schedule and Readings: 1) Introduction & Natural Knowledge in the Past Lecture: Peter Bowler and Iwan Morus, Making Modern Science (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2005), pp. 1‐4. (Some articles related to ancient science and technology can be found in the “Further Readings” section in the courseweb in NTULearn.) 2) Scientific Revolution Lecture: Andrew Ede and Lesley Cormack, A History of Science in Society, Volume II (New York: Broadview Press, 2004), pp. 11‐47. Tutorial: Peter Dear, “Totius in verba: Rhetoric and Authority in the Early Royal Society,” Isis 76 (1985), pp.
    [Show full text]
  • History of Science Society Newsletter April 2002
    ISSN 0739-4934 1.APR 3 0 2002 NEWSLETTER HISTORY ~~ OF SCIENCE VOLUME 31 NUMBER 2 April 2002 SOCIETY The Origin of the HSS Newsletter Roger H. Stuewer, University ofMinnesota hirty years ago, when the HSS professional societies periodically published centralization of activities there, the T Newsletter was founded, the History of a newsletter to inform their members of fast­ Newsletter Editorial Committee, as I recall, Science Society was a remarkably different breaking events and other news of their died a natural death, although for a time professional organization than it is today. Its professions, and he suggested that the HSS individual members on it continued to membership was much smaller, and its should consider doing so as well. The Council provide help and advice. meetings took place in alternate years with embraced his suggestion and handed me The HSS Newsletter was an the American Association for the editorial responsibility-my first real job as immediate and wonderful success. Issue after Advancement of Science and the American incoming Secretary. My first act was to issue carried announcements of awards and Historical Association. Its Counci I members establish a geographically representative honors received by HSS members; offered valuable help and advice, but its Newsletter Editorial Committee consisting information on new programs, new courses, daily affairs were largely in the hands of its of senior scholars Bernard S. Finn, David L. and new publications in the field; notices of dedicated officers and Editor of Isis, Robert Lindberg, and John L. Heilbron, and graduate forthcoming conferences and meetings P. Multhauf. The steadfast Treasurer of the students Fred Gregory, Richard H.
    [Show full text]
  • Historical Foundations for a Global Perspective on the Emergence of A
    Working Papers No. 176/13 Historical Foundations for a Global Perspective on the Emergence of a Western European Regime for the Discovery, Development and Diffusion of Useful and Reliable Knowledge Patrick O’Brien © Patrick O’Brien March 2013 1 Department of Economic History London School of Economics Houghton Street London, WC2A 2AE Tel: +44 (0) 20 7955 7860 Fax: +44 (0) 20 7955 7730 2 Historical Foundations for a Global Perspective on the Emergence of a Western European Regime for the Discovery, Development and Diffusion of Useful and Reliable Knowledge* Patrick O’Brien ABSTRACT At a ‘conjuncture’ in pre-modern global history, labeled by previous generations of historians as the ‘Scientific Revolution’, the societies and states of western Europe established and promoted a regime of interconnected institutions for the accumulation of useful and reliable knowledge. This placed their economies on trajectories that led to divergent prospects for long-term technological change and material progress. Although the accumulation of such knowledge takes place over millennia of time, and in contexts that are global, critical interludes or conjunctures in a “dialogue of civilizations” have remained geographically localized, and indigenous in nature. Determining the locations, origins and forms of this particular conjuncture is often dismissed as an exercise in Eurocentric history. Modern scholarship has also preferred to emphasize the roles played by craftsmen in its progress and diffusion - ignoring metaphysical and religious foundations of knowledge about the natural world. My survey aims to restore traditional perceptions that the West passed through a transformation in its hegemonic beliefs about prospects for the comprehension and manipulation of that world in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries.
    [Show full text]
  • Editorials the Bible and Ellen White Remembering Roy Branson After
    summer 2015 n VOLUME 43 ISSUE 3 SPECTRUM contents 5 Editorials 2 The Tears of San Antonio | BY BONNIE DWYER 3 The First Adventist? | BY CHARLES SCRIVEN 18 The Bible and Ellen White 5 The Big Bible, Bigger Still | BY RON GRAYBILL 17 Ellen White: Centennial Prayer | BY JIM PEDERSEN 18 Not Talking to Ourselves Any More: Adventists, Ellen White, 20 and the Scholars | BY ERIC ANDERSON AND BEN MCARTHUR 20 Ellen White on Ordaining Women: “The Question is Not for Men to Settle” | BY GILBERT VALENTINE 29 My Parents and Ellen White: History as Autobiography | BY JONATHAN BUTLER 22 Remembering Roy Branson 37 Roy Branson: Friends Pay Tribute at Memorial Service | BY RONALD NUMBERS, LARRY GERATY, GILLIAN GERATY, ROBERT SODERBLOM, ALVIN KWIRAM, GERALD WINSLOW, CHARLES SCRIVEN, BONNIE DWYER, DAVID LARSON, RICHARD HART, JOHN BRUNT, AND ALITA BYRD After San Antonio 29 65 San Antonio and the Church Manual | BY JOHN BRUNT 69 How the Adventist Church Changed its Fundamental Beliefs in San Antonio | BY LARRY GERATY| BY XXX 73 The Time Has Come | BY LOTHAR TRÄDER 37 75 What Happens Next? | BY MITCHELL TYNER 80 Reflecting on San Antonio: Or, Hermeneutics or Humility or What’s the Bible Really Got to Do With It? | BY HEROLD WEISS Book Review 64 85 Des Ford Takes on Darwin | A BOOK REVIEW BY BRYAN NESS Poem back cover Roy Branson: I Know in Part | BY MICHAEL ORLICH WWW.SPECTRUMMAGAZINE.ORG 1 EDITORIAL n from the editor The Tears of San Antonio | BY BONNIE DWYER n Wednesday, July 8, as I walked the lower organizational structure for the church in many divisions, level Alamodome hallway late in the day, including the General Conference.
    [Show full text]
  • [email protected] Fri. by Appointment
    Spring 2012 Office: JO 3.926 Dr. Patrick Dennis Office Hours: Tues. 4:30-5:30pm Email: [email protected] Fri. by appointment HIST 3328.501 History and Philosophy of Science: Perspectives Thursdays, 5:30-8:15pm FN 2.106 Prerequisites HIST 1301, HIST 1302, HIST 2301, HIST 2330, HIST 2331, or equivalent, as well as enrollment in the UTeach program. This course is designed specifically for those students training to be elementary and secondary science and mathematics teachers through the UTeach program, and (space permitting) other students interested in the interdisciplinary relations between the sciences and the humanities, such as pre-health majors and those pursuing the minor in Medical and Scientific Humanities (MaSH). This course counts toward the Minor in Medical and Scientific Humanities (MaSH). Course Description Where did science come from? How did human beings begin to make sense of the natural world and their part in it? How has science evolved? How are the same processes of imagination, invention, and discovery still at work today in shaping our understanding of natural phenomena? What roles have those from diverse epistemological backgrounds played in the evolution of science? In this interdisciplinary history course, we will ask such questions (and more) as we read and discuss works in the history and philosophy of science and mathematics, primary texts in natural philosophy, as well as scientific biography and literature. We will trace the origins and development of Western science and its construction of natural knowledge from the ancient world through to the near present. From philosophical, scientific, and literary points of view, we will explore whether there was any such thing as the “Scientific Revolution,” and if so, how the “revolutionary” changes in world views influenced human life on social and political levels.
    [Show full text]
  • April 2000 SOCIETY
    ISSN 0739-4934 -~EWSLETTER I IISTORY OF SCIENCE VOLUME 29 NUMBER 2 April 2000 SOCIETY THE AMERICANIZATION OF T HE HISTORY OF SCIENCE SOCIETY: WHAT DOES IT MEAN? Ronald L. Numbers, HSS President anuary 1, 2000, not looked on America primarily ARTICLES ON AMERICAN SCIENCE only ushered in what J asasceneof scientific"failure," IN Isis BY DECADE many consider a new which he charitably attributed 1930s 17 millennium but also a to indifference to research and 1940s 13 new era in the History of weak minds. 1950s 23 Science Society. For the The first call for greater 1960s 12 first time since its attention to American 1970s 29 founding in 1924 all of scientific developments came 1980s 35 the executive officers of 1990s 43 the society are from Shryock. Writing in Isis Americanises, as is the in 1944, he sought to carve out a distinctive space for American executive director. For science-in American history. "The value of studies in the history of Americanises, who long American science is not to be found primarily in contributions to the felt marginalized in the history of science as such," he wrote, "but rather to the history of the RONALD L. NUMBERS HSS, this represents a United States." Inspired by the American-made atomic bomb, the distinguished Harvard historian Arthur M. Schlesinger similarly gratifying turn of events. But there is nothing revolutionary about it. argued that American historians should explore the external connections During the first half-century of the HSS few American historians between science and participated in the society and fewer still served as officers.
    [Show full text]
  • History of Science Society’S Most Valued Functions
    ISSN 0739-4934 Newsletter HISTORY OF SCIENCE VOLUME 35 NUMBER 3 July 2006 SOCIETY Force Equals Mass Times Acceleration: What You Think: HSS Publications and Services Give This Great Body a Push rants for graduate student travel, on-line access to a bibliographical data base, Gthe new “Focus” sections in Isis, and a responsive Executive Office - these are among the History of Science Society’s most valued functions. According to a recent survey, members want HSS core functions, such as our publications and the annu- al meeting, kept in orbit, and new ones launched. You have, for example, conveyed to us ideas for supporting new-comers to the field, speaking more accessibly and meaningfully to each other and to those outside the discipline, and fulfilling the potential of our international character. The enthusiasm manifested for the field and the Society, along with the profusion of positive suggestions for the future, assured a delighted Executive Committee that HSS has the commitment and ener- gy to enhance significantly what it does for its members and the history of science. The online survey is one way individual members are participating in shap- ing the future of the Society and the discipline. Many thanks to those who partic- ipated. (To those who did not, you will have a second chance when the Committee Reading the HSS Survey on Research and the Profession produces a more detailed survey.) We will be using the survey results, along with deliberations by the Council and various commit- he recent survey of HSS members represents an ongoing conversation. tees, as the basis for imagining the future of HSS.
    [Show full text]