Growing Hazelnuts in Ore;

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Growing Hazelnuts in Ore; O1EQN A 00 00 3 0 4 OLI297 I E Ci / E $1.00 41:49 I9S I121 Growing Hazelnuts in Ore;., DATE. OF OUT IS information: PUBLICATIONcurrent most THIS For http://extension.oregonstate.edu/catalogExtension Circular 1219 I May 1985 Oregon State University Extension Service Contents Economic importance 3 Managing a hazelnut orchard (continued) Cropvalue ....................................................... 3 Covercrops .........................................................11 Geographic distribution ...................................... 3 Training and pruning .............................................. 12 Marketingaids .................................................. 3 Wound dressings ................................................... 12 Production costs ................................................ 3 Sucker control ...................................................... 12 Locating the orchard ...............................................4 Orchard nutrition ...................................................... 13 Suitable soils .................................................... 4 Neworchards ....................................................... 13 Determining soil suitability ..................................4 Potassium (K) .................................................. 13 Magnesium (Mg) ..............................................DATE. 13 Hazelnut varieties .................................................. 4 Lime.............................................................13 1,3 Nut development ................................................... 5 Nitrogen(N) .................................................... Mature orchard nutrition ......................................... 13 Floral initiation and development........................... 5 Fertilizer needs OFand application ................................. 13 Pollination ...........................................................6 Nitrogen(N) ....................................................13 Pollinizer requirements ....................................... 6 Phosphorus (P) ................................................ 13 Pollinizer spacing and placement ........................... 6 Potassium (K) .................................................. 13 Boron(B) ........................................................ 14 Blanks, brownstain, and developmental dropouts........... 7 Insects....................................................................14 Blank formation ............................................... 7 OUT Brownstain ...................................................... 7 Diseases..................................................................14 Flower cluster losses ...........................................7 Orchard sanitation ................................................. 14 Growing and selecting planting stock ...........................7IS Bacterial blight ..................................................... 14 Eastern filbert blight ...............................................15 Method of propagating.......................................7 Control.......................................................... 15 Propagating from suckers .................................... 8 Graftedtrees ................................................ 8 Animals.................................................................. 15 Selecting planting stock ....................................... 8 Bluejays and squirrels .............................................15 15 Orchard design ...................................................... 8 Deerdamage ........................................................ Gophers and moles .................................................15 Intercropping with hazelnut trees ........................... 8 Meadowmice ....................................................... 16 Arrangement of permanent trees ............................information:9 Moss and lichen ......................................................... 16 Establishing a new orchard .......................................9 Staking out the orchard .......................................9 Harvesting ...............................................................16 Using a planting board ........................................10 Leaves and trash on the ground .................................. 17 Planting the trees ............................................... 10 Ground preparation for mechanical harvesting.............. 17 Pruning at time of planting ...................................10 Time of harvest ..................................................... 17 Protecting against sunburn ................................... 10 Ethephon to loosen nuts .......................................... 17 Mulching .................................................... 10 Windrowing........................................................17 Cleaning equipment on harvesters .............................. 18 Managing a hazelnut orchard....................................current 10 NontillagePUBLICATION ....................................................... 10 Washing, drying, and storage ........................................ 18 Cultivation ......................................................11 Washing .............................................................18 Intercropping ...................................................11 Drying ................................................................ 18 Storage ............................................................... 19 Weed competitionmost......................................... 11 THIS For http://extension.oregonstate.edu/catalog 2 Hazelnuts have been cultivated for The tree may produce a few nuts The Northwest's production is 4 to many centuries. Pliny, in 60 A.D., when 2 or 3 years old, but it is not 6% of world hazelnut production and narrated, "Filberts and hazels... are a considered to be in commercial produc- 2 to 3% of U.S. domestic production kind of nut and were called heretofore tion until it is 6 years old. Mature of all tree nuts (including hazelnuts, Abellinae, of their native place... they orchards produce from less than 1,000 walnuts, almonds, and pecans). Hazel- come out of Pontus into Natolia and pounds of dry nuts per acre to better nut prices are, therefore, influenced by Greece and therefore they may be than a ton or more. A well-managed the world production and supply of called pontic nuts." The hazelnut is a orchard will produce about 1,500 hazelnutsas well as the supply of widely distributed species in Europe pounds of dry nuts per acre as an all other nuts. and into Asia. average. It should remain productive Some authorities believe that the up to 40 years or more. Marketing aids name filbert was originallyfull beard, The Filbert/Hazelnut Marketing referring to the fact that in some Board, created in 1949, administers a varieties the husk entirely covers the Federal Marketing Order. The board is nut. Others believe the name has been composed of five growers, three derived from St. Philibert because processors, and one nonindustry August 22, the date dedicated to him, Economic importance member. The marketing order provides corresponds to the ripening date of the for the marketingDATE. of inshell nuts earliest hazelnuts in England. Al- Crop value according to market demands. Produc- though growers in Oregon usually call The contribution hazelnuts make to tion beyond the demands of the inshell them filberts, most customers know Oregon's economy is considerable. market must be shelled. them as hazelnuts. Between 1979 and 1983, the crop OFThe Filbert Bargaining Association, While there is one species of varied from 7,500 to 18,400 tons, and formed in 1972, bargains for grower hazelnut (Corylus cornuta) native to price and delivery conditions with all Oregon, the cultivated varieties of cash farm receipts ranged from $3 to $17.4 million. The value added by packers of record. In 1980, the hazelnuts (Corylus avellana) were processing is about 43% of the cash association represented about 60% of introduced to the United States from receipts. Therefore, the hazelnutOUT indus- the total tonnage in Oregon. Europe by Felix Gillet, a nursery The Oregon Filbert Commission was manager in Nevada City, California. try contributes between $12.3 and $38.3 million annually to Oregon's established in 1951 for sales promotion Between 1885 and 1905, he intro- economy. IS and production research. Commission duced Barcelona, DuChilly, Daviana, members are growers. Commission Hall's Giant, Montebello, Nottingham, activities are financed by grower and others. Some of these varieties are Geographic distribution assessments. still grown in the Pacific Northwest Hazelnut orchards cover the Wil- In recent years, large nut-marketing today. lamette Valley of Oregon from Eugene organizations from California have The natural growth of the hazelnut to Portland and from the foothills of begun to sell Oregon hazelnuts. (filbert) is a bush or a multitrunked, the Coast Range to the foothills of the shrubby tree. In Turkey and southern Cascade Mountains.information: Hazelnut trees Europe, it has been grown in this grow best on deep river-bottom soils, Production costs manner for centuries. In Oregon, but they also thrive on a wide variety of Production costs usually are classi- however, hazelnuts usually are grown other soils. fied into four major categories: cul- as single-trunk trees that may attain a The dominant feature controlling tural operations, harvesting, drying height of 30 feet under proper
Recommended publications
  • The Role of Forage Availability on Diet Choice and Body Condition in American Beavers (Castor Canadensis)
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln U.S. National Park Service Publications and Papers National Park Service 2013 The oler of forage availability on diet choice and body condition in American beavers (Castor canadensis) William J. Severud Northern Michigan University Steve K. Windels National Park Service Jerrold L. Belant Mississippi State University John G. Bruggink Northern Michigan University Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/natlpark Severud, William J.; Windels, Steve K.; Belant, Jerrold L.; and Bruggink, John G., "The or le of forage availability on diet choice and body condition in American beavers (Castor canadensis)" (2013). U.S. National Park Service Publications and Papers. 124. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/natlpark/124 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the National Park Service at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in U.S. National Park Service Publications and Papers by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Mammalian Biology 78 (2013) 87–93 Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect Mammalian Biology journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/mambio Original Investigation The role of forage availability on diet choice and body condition in American beavers (Castor canadensis) William J. Severud a,∗, Steve K. Windels b, Jerrold L. Belant c, John G. Bruggink a a Northern Michigan University, Department of Biology, 1401 Presque Isle Avenue, Marquette, MI 49855, USA b National Park Service, Voyageurs National Park, 360 Highway 11 East, International Falls, MN 56649, USA c Carnivore Ecology Laboratory, Forest and Wildlife Research Center, Mississippi State University, Box 9690, Mississippi State, MS 39762, USA article info abstract Article history: Forage availability can affect body condition and reproduction in wildlife.
    [Show full text]
  • Filbert European Corylus Avellana Corylus Avellana Commonly Called
    Filbert European Corylus avellana Corylus avellana commonly called European Filbert, European hazel, cobnut and Harry Lauder’s walking stick is a deciduous, thicket-forming, multi-trunked suckering shrub. Common names of filbert and hazel are likely interchangeable. Hazel is more often used in reference to wild specimens and filbert is more likely to be used in reference to cultivated plants. The filbert nuts to be produced in commerce primarily come from plants (C. avellano x C. maxima). ‘Contorta’, commonly called contorted filbert, corkscrew hazel or Harry Lauder’s Walking Stick, is contorted version of the species plant. It was discovered growing as a sport in an English hedgerow In the mid-1800s by Victorian Gardner Cannon Ellacombe. This plant was given the common name of Harry Lauder’s walking stick in the 1900s in honor of the Scottish entertainer Harry Lauder. The European Filbert leaves are dark green, slightly covered with fine soft hairs above and beneath; alternate; 2-4” in length, somewhat circular to egg – shaped or heart – shaped, abruptly tapers to a point at apex, edge doubly toothed, often with lobes, petiole ¼” to ½” long. The twigs are brown, glandular – hairy. Buds green to brown, hairless with hairy scale; overlapping, egg shaped to round. Flowers/Fruit: Flowers monoecious; male flowers are large (2”to 3”) catkins, yellow – brown, late winter to early spring blooming; female flowers inconspicuous. Fruit a nut; nuts inside involucre, which is toothed or lubed and nearly the length of the nut; ¾” in length; edible fruit grown commercially as a crop. European Filbert bark is pale to gray – brown, smoother with age, not an ornamental feature.
    [Show full text]
  • Nutritive Value and Degradability of Leaves from Temperate Woody Resources for Feeding Ruminants in Summer
    3rd European Agroforestry Conference Montpellier, 23-25 May 2016 Silvopastoralism (poster) NUTRITIVE VALUE AND DEGRADABILITY OF LEAVES FROM TEMPERATE WOODY RESOURCES FOR FEEDING RUMINANTS IN SUMMER Emile JC 1*, Delagarde R 2, Barre P 3, Novak S 1 Corresponding author: [email protected] mailto:(1) INRA, UE 1373 FERLUS, 86600 Lusignan, France (2) INRA, UMR 1348 INRA-Agrocampus Ouest, 35590 Saint-Gilles, France (3) INRA, UR 4 URP3F, 86600 Lusignan, France 1/ Introduction Integrating agroforestry in livestock farming systems may be a real opportunity in the current climatic, social and economic conditions. Trees can contribute to improve welfare of grazing ruminants. The production of leaves from woody plants may also constitute a forage resource for livestock (Papanastasis et al. 2008) during periods of low grasslands production (summer and autumn). To know the potential of leaves from woody plants to be fed by ruminants, including dairy females, the nutritive value of these new forages has to be evaluated. References on nutritive values that already exist for woody plants come mainly from tropical or Mediterranean climatic conditions (http://www.feedipedia.org/) and very few data are currently available for the temperate regions. In the frame of a long term mixed crop-dairy system experiment integrating agroforestry (Novak et al. 2016), a large evaluation of leaves from woody resources has been initiated. The objective of this evaluation is to characterise leaves of woody forage resources potentially available for ruminants (hedgerows, coppices, shrubs, pollarded trees), either directly by browsing or fed after cutting. This paper presents the evaluation of a first set of 12 woody resources for which the feeding value is evaluated through their protein and fibre concentrations, in vitro digestibility (enzymatic method) and effective ruminal degradability.
    [Show full text]
  • Nursery Price List
    Lincoln-Oakes Nurseries 3310 University Drive • Bismarck, ND 58504 Nursery Seed Price List 701-223-8575 • [email protected] The following seed is in stock or will be collected and available for 2010 or spring 2011 PENDING CROP, all climatic zone 3/4 collections from established plants in North Dakota except where noted. Acer ginnala - 18.00/lb d.w Cornus racemosa - 19.00/lb Amur Maple Gray dogwood Acer tataricum - 15.00/lb d.w Cornus alternifolia - 21.00/lb Tatarian Maple Pagoda dogwood Aesculus glabra (ND, NE) - 3.95/lb Cornus stolonifera (sericea) - 30.00/lb Ohio Buckeye – collected from large well performing Redosier dogwood Trees in upper midwest Amorpha canescens - 90.00/lb Leadplant 7.50/oz Amorpha fruiticosa - 10.50/lb False Indigo – native wetland restoration shrub Aronia melanocarpa ‘McKenzie” - 52.00/lb Black chokeberry - taller form reaching 6-8 ft in height, glossy foliage, heavy fruit production, Corylus cornuta (partial husks) - 16.00/lb NRCS release Beaked hazelnut/Native hazelnut (Inquire) Caragana arborescens - 16.00/lb Cotoneaster integerrimus ‘Centennial’ - 32.00/lb Siberian peashrub European cotoneaster – NRCS release, 6-10’ in height, bright red fruit Celastrus scandens (true) (Inquire) - 58.00/lb American bittersweet, no other contaminating species in area Crataegus crus-galli - 22.00/lb Cockspur hawthorn, seed from inermis Crataegus mollis ‘Homestead’ arnoldiana-24.00/lb Arnold hawthorn – NRCS release Crataegus mollis - 19.50/lb Downy hawthorn Elaeagnus angustifolia - 9.00/lb Russian olive Elaeagnus commutata
    [Show full text]
  • Descriptors for Hazelnut (Corylus Avellana L.)
    Descriptors for Hazelnut(Corylus avellana L.) List of Descriptors Allium (E, S) 2001 Pearl millet (E/F) 1993 Almond (revised)* (E) 1985 Pepino (E) 2004 Apple* (E) 1982 Phaseolus acutifolius (E) 1985 Apricot* (E) 1984 Phaseolus coccineus* (E) 1983 Avocado (E/S) 1995 Phaseolus lunatus (P) 2001 Bambara groundnut (E, F) 2000 Phaseolus vulgaris* (E, P) 1982 Banana (E, S, F) 1996 Pigeonpea (E) 1993 Barley (E) 1994 Pineapple (E) 1991 Beta (E) 1991 Pistachio (A, R, E, F) 1997 Black pepper (E/S) 1995 Pistacia (excluding Pistacia vera) (E) 1998 Brassica and Raphanus (E) 1990 Plum* (E) 1985 Brassica campestris L. (E) 1987 Potato variety* (E) 1985 Buckwheat (E) 1994 Quinua* (E) 1981 Cañahua (S) 2005 Rambutan 2003 Capsicum (E/S) 1995 Rice* (E) 2007 Cardamom (E) 1994 Rocket (E, I) 1999 Carrot (E, S, F) 1998 Rye and Triticale* (E) 1985 Cashew* (E) 1986 Safflower* (E) 1983 Cherry* (E) 1985 Sesame (E) 2004 Chickpea (E) 1993 Setaria italica and S. pumilia (E) 1985 Citrus (E, F, S) 1999 Shea tree (E) 2006 Coconut (E) 1995 Sorghum (E/F) 1993 Coffee (E, S, F) 1996 Soyabean* (E/C) 1984 Cotton (revised)* (E) 1985 Strawberry (E) 1986 Cowpea (E, P)* 1983 Sunflower* (E) 1985 Cultivated potato* (E) 1977 Sweet potato (E/S/F) 1991 Date Palm (F) 2005 Taro (E, F, S) 1999 Durian (E) 2007 Tea (E, S, F) 1997 Echinochloa millet* (E) 1983 Tomato (E, S, F) 1996 Eggplant (E/F) 1990 Tropical fruit (revised)* (E) 1980 Faba bean* (E) 1985 Ulluco (S) 2003 Fig (E) 2003 Vigna aconitifolia and V.
    [Show full text]
  • Diversity of Wisconsin Rosids
    Diversity of Wisconsin Rosids . oaks, birches, evening primroses . a major group of the woody plants (trees/shrubs) present at your sites The Wind Pollinated Trees • Alternate leaved tree families • Wind pollinated with ament/catkin inflorescences • Nut fruits = 1 seeded, unilocular, indehiscent (example - acorn) *Juglandaceae - walnut family Well known family containing walnuts, hickories, and pecans Only 7 genera and ca. 50 species worldwide, with only 2 genera and 4 species in Wisconsin Carya ovata Juglans cinera shagbark hickory Butternut, white walnut *Juglandaceae - walnut family Leaves pinnately compound, alternate (walnuts have smallest leaflets at tip) Leaves often aromatic from resinous peltate glands; allelopathic to other plants Carya ovata Juglans cinera shagbark hickory Butternut, white walnut *Juglandaceae - walnut family The chambered pith in center of young stems in Juglans (walnuts) separates it from un- chambered pith in Carya (hickories) Juglans regia English walnut *Juglandaceae - walnut family Trees are monoecious Wind pollinated Female flower Male inflorescence Juglans nigra Black walnut *Juglandaceae - walnut family Male flowers apetalous and arranged in pendulous (drooping) catkins or aments on last year’s woody growth Calyx small; each flower with a bract CA 3-6 CO 0 A 3-∞ G 0 Juglans cinera Butternut, white walnut *Juglandaceae - walnut family Female flowers apetalous and terminal Calyx cup-shaped and persistant; 2 stigma feathery; bracted CA (4) CO 0 A 0 G (2-3) Juglans cinera Juglans nigra Butternut, white
    [Show full text]
  • Effects of Processing Treatments on Nutritional Quality of Raw Almond (Terminalia Catappa Linn.) Kernels
    Available online a t www.pelagiaresearchlibrary.com Pelagia Research Library Advances in Applied Science Research, 2016, 7(1):1-7 ISSN: 0976-8610 CODEN (USA): AASRFC Effects of processing treatments on nutritional quality of raw almond (Terminalia catappa Linn.) kernels *Makinde Folasade M. and Oladunni Subomi S. Department of Food Science and Technology, Bowen University, Iwo, Osun State, Nigeria _____________________________________________________________________________________________ ABSTRACT Almond (Terminalia catappa Linn) is one of the lesser utilized oil kernel distributed throughout the tropics including Nigeria ecosystem. In this research work, the effects of soaking, blanching, autoclaving and roasting on the proximate, mineral, vitamin and anti-nutritional concentrations of almond kernel were determined. The result of chemical composition revealed that raw almond kernel contained 11.93% moisture, 23.0% crude protein, 48.1% crude fat, 2.43% crude fiber, 2.69% ash, 12.0% carbohydrate, 0.35mg/100g thiamine, 0.15mg/100g riboflavin, 0.19mg/100g niacin and minerals among which the most important are potassium (9.87 mg/100g), calcium (4.66 mg/100g) and magnesium (4.45 mg/100g). Tannin, phytate and oxalate concentration in raw almond kernel were 0.15, 0.13 and 0.15mg/100g respectively. Increase in ash and fiber was noted for treated samples with time compared to raw almond. Compared to untreated kernels, soaking, blanching and autoclaving decreased fat content but there was increase during roasting of the kernels. Mineral concentrations were significantly increased by various treatments compared to raw kernel. However, roasting for 15 min resulted in highest increase in potassium (41.2 percent), calcium (45.1 percent), phosphorus (43.3 percent) and magnesium (43.6 percent).
    [Show full text]
  • Hazelnuts Resistant to Eastern Filbert Blight: Are We There Yet?
    Hazelnuts Resistant to Eastern Filbert Blight: Are We There Yet? Thomas J. Molnar, Ph.D. Plant Biology and Pathology Dept. Rutgers University The American Chestnut Society Annual Meeting October 22, 2011 Nut Tree Breeding at Rutgers Based on the tremendous genetic improvements demonstrated in several previously underutilized turf species, Dr. C. Reed Funk strongly believed similar work could be done with nut trees Title of project started in 1996: Underutilized Perennial Food Crops Genetic Improvement Tom Molnar and Reed Funk Program Adelphia Research Farm August 2001 Nut Breeding at Rutgers Starting in 1996, species of interest included – black walnuts, Persian walnuts and heartnuts – pecans, hickories Pecan shade trial – chestnuts, Adelphia 2000 – almonds, – hazelnuts We built a germplasm collection of over 25,000 trees planted across five Rutgers research farms – Cream Ridge Fruit Research Farm (Cream Ridge, NJ) – Adelphia Research Farm (Freehold, NJ) Pecan shade trial Adelphia 2008 – HF1, HF2, HF3 (North Brunswick, NJ) Nut Breeding at Rutgers Goals – Identify species that show the greatest potential for New Jersey and Mid- Atlantic region – Develop breeding program to create superior well- adapted cultivars that reliably produce high- quality, high-value crops • while requiring reduced inputs of pesticides, fungicides, management, etc. Nut Breeding at Rutgers While most species showed great promise for substantial improvement, we had to narrow our focus to be most effective Hazelnuts stood out as the species where we could make significant contributions in a relatively short period of time – Major focus since 2000 Hazelnuts at Rutgers Why we chose to focus on hazelnuts: – success of initial plantings made in 1996/1997 with few pests and diseases – short generation time and small plant size (4 years from seed to seed) – wide genetic diversity and the ability to hybridize different species – ease of making controlled crosses – backlog of information and breeding advances – existing technologies and markets for nuts Hazelnuts: Corylus spp.
    [Show full text]
  • A Forever Green Agriculture Initiative
    Developing High-efficiency Agricultural Systems: A Forever Green Agriculture Initiative Donald Wyse, University of Minnesota How did agricultural landscapes lose their diversity? Hansen, MN Exp Sta Protein efficiency 14% 1lb Pork 1,630 gal water 1lb Potatoes 24 gal water ETHANOL FROM CORN Dry Milling Process Grain Grind, Enzyme Digestion Distillers Grains Sugars Yeast, Distillation ETHANOL Conceptual framework for comparing land use and trade-offs of ecosystem services J. A. Foley et al., Science 309, 570 -574 (2005) Published by AAAS What are some of the consequences resulting from the loss of landscape diversity and continuous living soil covers? GGasper, USDA, NRCS Hypoxia in the Gulf of Mexico 30.0 L. Calcasieu Atchafalaya R. Sabine L. Mississippi R. 29.5 Terrebonne Bay 29.0 latitude (deg.) 28.5 50 km 93.5 92.5 91.5 90.5 89.5 longitude (deg.) bottom dissolved oxygen less than 2.0 mg/L, July 1999 Rabalais et al. 2000 Satellite images of vegetative activity. Areas of annual row cropping April 20 – May 3 Areas of perennial vegetation May 4 – 17 Satellite images of vegetative activity. May 18 - 31 June 15 - 28 Satellite images of vegetative activity. July 13 - 26 October 5 - 18 Annual Tile Drainage Loss in Corn-Soybean Rotation Waseca, 1987-2001 July-March April, May, 29% June 71% Gyles Randall, 2003 Nitrogen Loads long-term average million lbs per year Statewide nitrogen sources to surface waters Urban Septic Feedlot runoff Stormwater 2% <1% 1% Forests 7% Atmospheric Cropland 9% groundwater Point 30% sources 9% Cropland runoff Cropland tile 5% drainage 37% Long Term Nitrogen Reductions 40% Veg.
    [Show full text]
  • This Article Appeared in a Journal Published by Elsevier. the Attached Copy Is Furnished to the Author for Internal Non-Commerci
    This article appeared in a journal published by Elsevier. The attached copy is furnished to the author for internal non-commercial research and education use, including for instruction at the authors institution and sharing with colleagues. Other uses, including reproduction and distribution, or selling or licensing copies, or posting to personal, institutional or third party websites are prohibited. In most cases authors are permitted to post their version of the article (e.g. in Word or Tex form) to their personal website or institutional repository. Authors requiring further information regarding Elsevier’s archiving and manuscript policies are encouraged to visit: http://www.elsevier.com/authorsrights Author's personal copy Scientia Horticulturae 171 (2014) 91–94 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Scientia Horticulturae journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/scihorti Short communication Effect of coconut water and growth regulator supplements on in vitro propagation of Corylus avellana L ∗ M.A. Sandoval Prando, P. Chiavazza, A. Faggio, C. Contessa Dipartimento di Scienze Agrarie Forestali e Alimentari (DISAFA), Università degli Studi di Torino, Largo Paolo Braccini, 2-10095 Grugliasco, TO, Italy a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t Article history: Corylus avellana L. represents an economically important crop in the European Union. Several protocols of Received 3 February 2014 hazelnut micropropagation have been tested but have not yet provided effective methods to allow large- Received in revised form 27 March 2014 scale propagation for commercial purposes, due to poor proliferation and yield. The aim of this work Accepted 31 March 2014 was to study the in vitro effects of coconut water (CW) in combinations with gibberellins and cytokinins Available online 19 April 2014 on proliferation and growth of hazelnut in vitro and the effect of explants orientation on shoot growth.
    [Show full text]
  • Native Trees of Massachusetts
    Native Trees of Massachusetts Common Name Latin Name Eastern White Pine Pinus strobus Common Name Latin Name Mountain Pine Pinus mugo Pin Oak Quercus palustris Pitch Pine Pinus rigida White Oak Quercus alba Red Pine Pinus resinosa Swamp White Oak Quercus bicolor Scots Pine Pinus sylvestris Chestnut Oak Quercus montana Jack Pine Pinus banksiana Eastern Cottonwood Populus deltoides Eastern Hemlock Tsuga canadensis https://plants.usda.gov/ Tamarack Larix laricina core/profile?symbol=P Black Spruce Picea mariana ODE3 White Spruce Picea glauca black willow Salix nigra Red Spruce Picea rubens Red Mulberry Morus rubra Norway Spruce Picea abies American Plum Prunus americana Northern White cedar Thuja occidentalis Canada Plum Prunus nigra Eastern Juniper Juniperus virginiana Black Cherry Prunus serotina Balsam Fir Abies balsamea Canadian Amelanchier canadensis American Sycamore Platanus occidentalis Serviceberry or Witchhazel Hamamelis virginiana Shadbush Honey Locust Gleditsia triacanthos American Mountain Sorbus americana Eastern Redbud Cercis canadensis Ash Yellow-Wood Cladrastis kentukea American Elm Ulmus americana Gray Birch Betula populifolia Slippery Elm Ulmus rubra Grey Alder Alnus incana Basswood Tilia americana Sweet Birch Betula lenta Smooth Sumac Rhus glabra Yellow Birch Betula alleghaniensis Red Maple Acer rubrum Heartleaf Paper Birch Betula cordifolia Horse-Chestnut Aesculus hippocastanum River Birch Betula nigra Staghorn Sumac Rhus typhina Smooth Alder Alnus serrulata Silver Maple Acer saccharinum American Ostrya virginiana Sugar Maple Acer saccharum Hophornbeam Boxelder Acer negundo American Hornbeam Carpinus caroliniana Black Tupelo Nyssa sylvatica Green Alder Alnus viridis Flowering Dogwood Cornus florida Beaked Hazelnut Corylus cornuta Northern Catalpa Catalpa speciosa American Beech Fagus grandifolia Black Ash Fraxinus nigra Black Oak Quercus velutina Devil's Walkingstick Aralia spinosa Downy Hawthorn Crataegus mollis.
    [Show full text]
  • Short-Term Fate of Rehabilitated Orphan Black Bears Released in New Hampshire
    Human–Wildlife Interactions 10(2): 258–267, Fall 2016 Short-term fate of rehabilitated orphan black bears released in New Hampshire Wˎ˜˕ˎˢ E. S˖˒˝ˑ1, Department of Natural Resources and the Environment, University of New Hampshire, 56 College Road, Durham, NH 03824, USA [email protected] Pˎ˝ˎ˛ J. Pˎ˔˒˗˜, Department of Natural Resources and the Environment, University of New Hampshire, 56 College Road, Durham, NH 03824, USA A˗ˍ˛ˎˠ A. T˒˖˖˒˗˜, New Hampshire Fish and Game Department, 629B Main Street, Lancaster, NH 03584, USA Bˎ˗˓ˊ˖˒˗ K˒˕ˑˊ˖, P.O. Box 37, Lyme, NH 03768, USA Abstract: We evaluated the release of rehabilitated, orphan black bears (Ursus americanus) in northern New Hampshire. Eleven bears (9 males, 2 females; 40–45 kg) were outfi tted with GPS radio-collars and released during May and June of 2011 and 2012. Bears released in 2011 had higher apparent survival and were not observed or reported in any nuisance behavior, whereas no bears released in 2012 survived, and all were involved in minor nuisance behavior. Analysis of GPS locations indicated that bears in 2011 had access to and used abundant natural forages or habitat. Conversely, abundance of soft and hard mast was lower in 2012, suggesting that nuisance behavior, and consequently survival, was inversely related to availability of natural forage. Dispersal from the release site ranged from 3.4–73 km across both years, and no bear returned to the rehabilitation facility (117 km distance). Rehabilitation appears to be a valid method for addressing certain orphan bear issues in New Hampshire.
    [Show full text]