DOCSLIB.ORG

Archaeology of the American South Anthropology 550 Spring 2020

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Archaeology of the American South Anthropology 550 Spring 2020 Archaeology of the American South Anthropology 550 Spring 2020 Prof. Vin Steponaitis ([email protected]; tel. 919-962-7748) Office hours by appointment in AL-109 (email or call to set up a time) Course Description: This seminar will focus on current issues and interpretations in the archaeology of the American South. It is intended for anyone with a serious interest in the ancient Indian cultures of this region, as understood through the lens of archaeological research. Through weekly readings and discussions, students will explore the lifeways and changes that characterized each major period of the South’s ancient history, from 16,000 years ago to the beginnings of European colonization. This will be a challenging course, and students are expected to come to class prepared. Course Structure: The seminar meets Tuesdays and Thursdays from 2:00 to 3:15 pm in Alumni 203. In general, discussion topics and readings will be assigned on weekly basis, with final readings posted a full week before they’re due. Typically, the readings for each topic will include some titles that everyone reads, and others that are divided among the students in the class. Students must do the assigned readings before each class meets. In class, students will discuss the general readings, and also present brief reports and critiques on the readings specifically assigned to them. Brief written exercises may be assigned if needed. In addition, each student will be expected to write a 12-15 page term paper on a topic of their choosing; this topic must be discussed with the instructor as soon as possible, and certainly no later than February 6th. At the end of the semester, each student will briefly present the results of the term-paper project orally to the class, and will also hand in the full written version. Course Requirements: In addition to the assigned readings, requirements include class participation (30%, including the class discussions and written exercises), an end-of-semester oral report (10%), a term paper (30%, due 4/23), and a final exam (30%, 5/4 @ 12 pm). Note that regular class attendance is essential. It will be taken into account by reducing your grade 10% for each unexcused absence. If you must miss class, please discuss it with me in advance if possible. If this is not possible, then please contact me as soon as possible afterwards. In general, illness or unavoidable family obligations (like weddings) are the only valid reasons for an absence. Course Web Site: The syllabus, readings, and other relevant information will be posted on the course web site at <http://rla.unc.edu/courses/Anth550/>. I may also use Sakai. I reserve the right to change the assigned readings as the semester progresses (with at least a week’s notice). Honor Code: Students are expected to adhere to UNC's Honor Code <http://honor.unc.edu/>. Schedule (as of 1/9): 1/9 Introduction and overview 1/14-1/23 Paleoindian period 1/28-2/6 Archaic period 2/11-2/13 Student research (no class) 2/28-2/20 Poverty Point and early mounds 2/25-2/27 Eastern Agricultural Complex 3/3-3/19 Woodland period 3/24-4/2 Mississippi period: Cahokia and Moundville 4/7-4/9 Mississippian iconography 4/14-4/21 Student presentations (in class) Archaeology of the American South Anthropology 550 Week 1: Overviews Part 1. To start off, I'd like you to read a review article concerning Southern archaeology, in order to get a preliminary glimpse at the “big picture.” Please read the article below. As you read, keep the following questions in mind: * What are the major periods, and when do they date? * What are the major cultural features or innovations that mark each of these periods? Also, come to the next class prepared to answer the following question: * Looking at peoples’ overall way of life (economy, settlements, social organization, etc.) what are the most important trends and transformations that can be seen archaeologically? Pick at least three (not everyone needs to choose the same ones). In reading the article, don’t let yourself get bogged down in trying to remember and understand all the details. Just focus on understanding the big picture, with particular reference to the questions above. Also be thinking about potential paper topics! Also, if you see any terms or phrases that you don’t understand or don’t make sense, feel free to bring these questions to class. Steponaitis, Vincas P. (1986). Prehistoric archaeology in the southeastern United States, 1970-1985. Annual Review of Anthropology 15:363-404. Part 2. Now it’s time to get a sense of the lay of the land. It’s difficult to talk about or to understand the ancient history of the South without knowing something about its geography, physiography, and forests. Read the article below and then do Exercise 1, which will be handed out separately and due in class on 8/26. Gremillion, Kristen J. (2004). Environment. In Southeast, edited by Raymond D. Fogelson, pp. 53- 67. Handbook of North American Indians, vol. 14. Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C. [Focus on pp. 53-60.] More Readings (Optional): Smith, Bruce D. (1986). Archaeology of the southeastern United States: From Dalton to de Soto, 10,000-500 B.P. Advances in World Archaeology, vol. 5, edited by F. Wendorf and A. Close, pp. 1-92. Fenneman, Nevin M. (1917). Physiographic Subdivision of the United States. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 3(1): 17-22. <http://www.jstor.org/stable/83422> Archaeology of the American South Anthropology 550 Week 2: Paleoindian Arrival The Clovis culture, traditionally dated 11,500-11,000 14C years BP has long been recognized as the earliest well-documented occupation of North America. At the same time, the question of whether “pre- Clovis” cultures existed has for decades been one of the most hotly debated questions in American archaeology. Here we will discuss the questions of when and how the South was first colonized. Currently there are a handful of sites in the South (and nearby) for which claims of pre-Clovis antiquity are being made. These readings offer a sampling of what we know about these sites. (Note that, for better or worse, most of what we know about some of these sites comes from fund-raising newsletters, newspaper stories, TV documentaries, and press releases — in other words, not from the scientific literature.) The general readings (which everyone must read) provide the latest word on the dating of Clovis, and an overview of the sites that are allegedly pre-Clovis. The supplemental readings (which will be divided among the class participants) give additional details on these sites. Waters, Michael R., and Thomas W. Stafford Jr. (2007). Redefining the Age of Clovis: Implications for the Peopling of the Americas. Science 315: 1122-1126. Goodyear, Albert C. (2005). Evidence of Pre-Clovis Sites in the Eastern United States. In Paleoamerican Origins: Beyond Clovis, edited by R. Bonnichsen, B. Lepper, D. Stanford, M. Waters, pp. 103-112. Texas A&M University Press. Pringle, Heather (2011). Texas Site Confirms Pre-Clovis Settlement of the Americas. Science 331: 1512. Clausen, C. J., A. D. Cohen, Cesare Emiliani, J. A. Holman, J. J. Stipp (1979). Little Salt Spring, Florida. Science 203:609-614. [Focus on the earliest occupation.] Adovasio, J. M., J. D. Gunn, J. Donahue, R. Stuckenrath (1978). Meadowcroft Rockshelter, 1977: An Overview. American Antiquity 43(4): 632-651. [Focus on the pre-Clovis assemblage and dates.] Supplemental Readings: Waters, Michael R., et al. (2011). The Buttermilk Creek Complex and the Origins of Clovis at the Debra L. Friedkin Site, Texas. Science 331: 1599-1603. McDonald, Jerry N. (2000). An Outline of the Pre-Clovis Archeology of SV-2, Saltville, Virginia, with Special Attention to a Bone Tool Dated 14,510 yr BP. Jeffersoniana 9: 1- 59. Virginia Museum of Natural History, Martinsville. Michael R. Waters et al. (2009). Geoarchaeological investigations at the Topper and Big Pine Tree sites, Allendale County, South Carolina. Journal of Archaeological Science 36: 1300–1311 [Focus on sections 1-3, 8, and 12.] Macphail, Richard I., and Joseph M. McAvoy (2008). A Micromorphological Analysis of Stratigraphic Integrity and Site Formation at Cactus Hill, an EarlyPaleoindian and Hypothesized Pre-Clovis Occupation in South-Central Virginia, USA. Geoarchaeology 23(5): 675–694. [Focus on pp. 675-679, 691-692.] Optional Readings: Jennings, Thomas A., and Michael R. Waters (2014). Pre-Clovis Lithic Technology at the Debra L. Friedkin Site, Texas. American Antiquity 79(1): 25-44. Archaeology of the American South Anthropology 550 Week 3: Paleoindian Settlement and Chronology The conventional wisdom these days subdivides southern Paleoindian point styles into three chronological units: Early, Middle, and Late. In reading the first article, think about the basis for this classification, and whether any different arrangements are equally consistent with the evidence. The next three articles show how data on large-scale distributions of Paleoindian points have driven models for the initial colonization of the South, and the problems with assigning archaeological meaning to such data. Anderson, David G., Lisa D. O’Steen, and Kenneth E. Sassaman (1996). Environmental and Chronological Considerations. In The Paleoindian and Early Archaic Southeast, edited by David G. Anderson and Kenneth E. Sassaman, pp. 3-15. University of Alabama Press. [Focus on pp. 7-15.] Anderson, David G. (1996). Models of Paleoindian and Early Archaic Settlement in the Lower Southeast. In The Paleoindian and Early Archaic Southeast, edited by David G. Anderson and Kenneth E. Sassaman, pp. 29-57. University of Alabama Press. [Read pp. 29-39, 53-57.] Anderson, David G., et al.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Ohio History Lesson 1
    http://www.touring-ohio.com/ohio-history.html http://www.ohiohistorycentral.org/category.php?c=PH http://www.oplin.org/famousohioans/indians/links.html Benchmark • Describe the cultural patterns that are visible in North America today as a result of exploration, colonization & conflict Grade Level Indicator • Describe, the earliest settlements in Ohio including those of prehistoric peoples The students will be able to recognize and describe characteristics of the earliest settlers Assessment Lesson 2 Choose 2 of the 6 prehistoric groups (Paleo-indians, Archaic, Adena, Hopewell, Fort Ancients, Whittlesey). Give two examples of how these groups were similar and two examples of how these groups were different. Provide evidence from the text to support your answer. Bering Strait Stone Age Shawnee Paleo-Indian People Catfish •Pre-Clovis Culture Cave Art •Clovis Culture •Plano Culture Paleo-Indian People • First to come to North America • “Paleo” means “Ancient” • Paleo-Indians • Hunted huge wild animals for food • Gathered seeds, nuts and roots. • Used bone needles to sew animal hides • Used flint to make tools and weapons • Left after the Ice Age-disappeared from Ohio Archaic People Archaic People • Early/Middle Archaic Period • Late Archaic Period • Glacial Kame/Red Ocher Cultures Archaic People • Archaic means very old (2nd Ohio group) • Stone tools to chop down trees • Canoes from dugout trees • Archaic Indians were hunters: deer, wild turkeys, bears, ducks and geese • Antlers to hunt • All parts of the animal were used • Nets to fish
    [Show full text]
  • Visualizing Paleoindian and Archaic Mobility in the Ohio
    VISUALIZING PALEOINDIAN AND ARCHAIC MOBILITY IN THE OHIO REGION OF EASTERN NORTH AMERICA A dissertation submitted to Kent State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy by Amanda N. Colucci May 2017 ©Copyright All rights reserved Except for previously published materials Dissertation written by Amanda N. Colucci B.A., Western State Colorado University, 2007 M.A., Kent State University, 2009 Ph.D., Kent State University, 2017 Approved by Dr. Mandy Munro-Stasiuk, Ph.D., Co-Chair, Doctoral Dissertation Committee Dr. Mark Seeman, Ph.D., Co-Chair, Doctoral Dissertation Committee Dr. Eric Shook, Ph.D., Members, Doctoral Dissertation Committee Dr. James Tyner, Ph.D. Dr. Richard Meindl, Ph.D. Dr. Alison Smith, Ph.D. Accepted by Dr. Scott Sheridan, Ph.D., Chair, Department of Geography Dr. James Blank, Ph.D., Dean, College of Arts and Sciences TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS ……………………………………………………………………………..……...……. III LIST OF FIGURES ….………………………………………......………………………………..…….…..………iv LIST OF TABLES ……………………………………………………………….……………..……………………x ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS..………………………….……………………………..…………….………..………xi CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 STUDY AREA AND TIMEFRAME ........................................................................................................................ 3 1.1.1 Paleoindian Period ...............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Page/Ladson (8Je591) : Excavation of an Early Holocene Occupation Site
    PAGE/LADSON (8JE591): EXCAVATION OF AN EARLY HOLOCENE OCCUPATION SITE IN THE AUCILLA RIVER, FLORIDA By BRINNEN S. CARTER A DISSERTATION PRESENTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA 2003 ' r Copyright 2003 by Brinnen S. Carter This document is dedicated to my dead father, Brinly Stewart Carter. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS There are many people who deserve the largest measure of thanks for their patience and support. On the intellectual side, S. David Webb and James (Jim) Dunbar are first and foremost. The Florida Department of State Special Category grants, National Geographic grants, and numerous private donations of money, time, and equipment, to the Aucilla River Prehistory Project, lead by Drs. Webb and Milanich paid for the fieldwork. Grants and salary from the Aucilla River Prehistory Project and discussions with Jim Dunbar have been important in directing the work that follows. Discussions with David Anderson (modeling Paleoindian/Early Archaic American Indian bands and macrobands), Albert Goodyear (tool technology and chronology), Jerald Milanich (hypothesis generation and testing), Louis Tesar (overall Florida Paleoindian site distribution and nature) have also contributed to the quality of work. One could hardly ask for a better archaeology faculty than the University of Florida's for understanding the breadth of New World Archaeology. The archaeology faculty of Florida State University—and especially Rochelle Marrinan—helped me keep my dignity while completing the dissertation. Teaching at FSU added notches to my resume and gave me a better understanding of the pressures under which university-based researchers work.
    [Show full text]
  • Inventory and Analysis of Archaeological Site Occurrence on the Atlantic Outer Continental Shelf
    OCS Study BOEM 2012-008 Inventory and Analysis of Archaeological Site Occurrence on the Atlantic Outer Continental Shelf U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Ocean Energy Management Gulf of Mexico OCS Region OCS Study BOEM 2012-008 Inventory and Analysis of Archaeological Site Occurrence on the Atlantic Outer Continental Shelf Author TRC Environmental Corporation Prepared under BOEM Contract M08PD00024 by TRC Environmental Corporation 4155 Shackleford Road Suite 225 Norcross, Georgia 30093 Published by U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Ocean Energy Management New Orleans Gulf of Mexico OCS Region May 2012 DISCLAIMER This report was prepared under contract between the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM) and TRC Environmental Corporation. This report has been technically reviewed by BOEM, and it has been approved for publication. Approval does not signify that the contents necessarily reflect the views and policies of BOEM, nor does mention of trade names or commercial products constitute endoresements or recommendation for use. It is, however, exempt from review and compliance with BOEM editorial standards. REPORT AVAILABILITY This report is available only in compact disc format from the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, Gulf of Mexico OCS Region, at a charge of $15.00, by referencing OCS Study BOEM 2012-008. The report may be downloaded from the BOEM website through the Environmental Studies Program Information System (ESPIS). You will be able to obtain this report also from the National Technical Information Service in the near future. Here are the addresses. You may also inspect copies at selected Federal Depository Libraries. U.S. Department of the Interior U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • A North American Perspective on the Volg (PDF)
    Quaternary International xxx (xxxx) xxx–xxx Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Quaternary International journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/quaint A North American perspective on the Volgu Biface Cache from Upper Paleolithic France and its relationship to the “Solutrean Hypothesis” for Clovis origins J. David Kilby Department of Anthropology, Texas State University, San Marcos, TX, USA ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Keywords: The “Solutrean hypothesis” for the origins of the North American Clovis Culture posits that early North American Volgu colonizers were direct descendants of European populations that migrated across the North Atlantic during the Clovis European Upper Paleolithic. The evidential basis for this model rests largely on proposed technological and Solutrean behavioral similarities shared by the North American Clovis archaeological culture and the French and Iberian Cache Solutrean archaeological culture. The caching of stone tools by both cultures is one of the specific behavioral correlates put forth by proponents in support of the hypothesis. While more than two dozen Clovis caches have been identified, Volgu is the only Solutrean cache identified at this time. Volgu consists of at least 15 exquisitely manufactured bifacial stone tools interpreted as an artifact cache or ritual deposit, and the artifacts themselves have long been considered exemplary of the most refined Solutrean bifacial technology. This paper reports the results of applying methods developed for the comparative analysis of the relatively more abundant caches of Clovis materials in North America to this apparently singular Solutrean cache. In addition to providing a window into Solutrean technology and perhaps into Upper Paleolithic ritual behavior, this comparison of Clovis and Solutrean assemblages serves to test one of the tangible archaeological implications of the “Solutrean hypoth- esis” by evaluating the technological and behavioral equivalence of Solutrean and Clovis artifact caching.
    [Show full text]
  • Evidence of Pre-Clovis Sites in the Eastern United States Albert C
    University of South Carolina Scholar Commons Archaeology and Anthropology, South Carolina Faculty & Staff ubP lications Institute of 2005 Evidence of Pre-Clovis Sites in the Eastern United States Albert C. Goodyear University of South Carolina - Columbia, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarcommons.sc.edu/sciaa_staffpub Part of the Anthropology Commons Publication Info Published in Paleoamerican Origins: Beyond Clovis, 2005, pages 103-112. http://csfa.tamu.edu/ © 2005 by Center for the Study of the First Americans This Book Chapter is brought to you by the Archaeology and Anthropology, South Carolina Institute of at Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty & Staff ubP lications by an authorized administrator of Scholar Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Paleoamerican Origins: Beyond Clovis A Peopling of the Americas Publication Evidence for Pre-Clovis Sites in the Eastern United States Albert C. Goodyear is believed that they sufficiently meet these criteria and thus con- stitute evidence. Truth is the daughter of time. –John Trapp, 17th-century Puritan writer Meadowcroft Rockshelter, Pennsylvania Abstract The most long-standing case for archaeological evidence of pre- Over the past 25 years, a number of archaeological sites in east- Clovis (earlier than 11,500 RCYBP) humans in the eastern United ern North America have manifested evidence of human occupa- States is the famous Meadowcroft Rockshelter, located about 48 tions dating earlier than 11,500 RCYBP. These sites include km southwest of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania (Figure 1). Meadowcroft Meadowcroft Rockshelter, Penn.; Cactus Hill, Va.; Saltville-2, Va.; Rockshelter is within the Cross Creek drainage, a tributary of the and Topper, S.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Archaeological Survey of the Chesapeake Bay Shorelines Associated with Accomack County and Northampton County, Virginia
    ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF THE ATLANTIC COAST SHORELINES ASSOCIATED WITH ACCOMACK COUNTY AND NORTHAMPTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA Survey and Planning Report Series No. 7 Virginia Department of Historic Resources 2801 Kensington Avenue Richmond, VA 23221 2003 ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF THE ATLANTIC COAST SHORELINES ASSOCIATED WITH ACCOMACK COUNTY AND NORTHAMPTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA Virginia Department of Historic Resources Survey and Planning Report Series No. 7 Author: Darrin L. Lowery Chesapeake Bay Watershed Archaeological Research Foundation 5264 Blackwalnut Point Road, P.O. Box 180 Tilghman, MD 21671 2003 ii ABSTRACT This report summarizes the results of an archaeological survey conducted along the Atlantic shorelines of both Accomack County and Northampton County, Virginia. Accomack and Northampton Counties represent the southernmost extension of the Delmarva Peninsula. The study area encompasses all of the lands adjacent to the Atlantic Ocean and shorelines associated with the back barrier island bays. A shoreline survey was conducted along the Atlantic Ocean to gauge the erosion threat to the archaeological resources situated along the shoreline. Archaeological sites along shorelines are subjected to numerous natural processes which hinder site visibility and limit archaeological interpretations. Summaries of these natural processes are presented in this report. The primary goal of the project was to locate, identify, and record any archaeological sites or remains along the Atlantic seashore that are threatened by shoreline erosion. The project also served as a test of a prehistoric site predictive/settlement model that has been utilized during other archaeological surveys along the Chesapeake Bay shorelines and within the interior sections of the Delmarva Peninsula. The prehistoric site predictive/settlement model is presented in detail using archaeological examples from Maryland and Virginia’s Eastern Shore.
    [Show full text]
  • OSL Ages of the Clovis, Late Paleoindian, and Archaic Components at Area 15 of the Gault Site, Central Texas, U.S.A
    Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports 7 (2016) 94–103 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/jasrep OSL ages of the Clovis, Late Paleoindian, and Archaic components at Area 15 of the Gault Site, Central Texas, U.S.A. K. Rodrigues a,⁎, W.J. Rink b,M.B.Collinsc,T.J.Williamsc, A. Keen-Zebert d,G.I.Lόpez e a Department of Geological Sciences and Engineering, University of Nevada, Reno, 1664 N Virginia St, Reno, NV 89557, United States b School of Geography and Earth Sciences, McMaster University, 1280 Main St. W., Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4K1, Canada c Department of Anthropology, Texas State University, 601 University Drive, San Marcos, TX 78666, United States d Division of Earth and Ecosystem Sciences, Desert Research Institute, 2215 Raggio Parkway, Reno, NV 89503, United States e Luminescence Dating Laboratory, CENIEH (Centro Nacional de Investigación sobre la Evolución Humana), Paseo Sierra de Atapuerca 3, Burgos 09002, Spain article info abstract Article history: The Gault Site, Texas, U.S.A., affords a near-complete regional prehistoric sequence from an ~2 m-thick alluvial Received 31 August 2015 sedimentary interval. Age estimates on Clovis, Late Paleoindian, and Archaic components were obtained using Received in revised form 10 March 2016 optically stimulated luminescence (OSL) dating of silt-sized quartz grains. The luminescence characteristics of Accepted 11 March 2016 the quartz are favorable, showing normal equivalent dose distributions and no evidence of incomplete zeroing. Available online 12 April 2016 The artifacts span Clovis to Archaic forms, and their ages are generally in excellent agreement with independent radiocarbon ages from five other Texas sites.
    [Show full text]
  • Anderson 2005 Paleo
    Paleoamerican Origins: Beyond Clovis A Peopling of the Americas Publication Pleistocene Human Occupation of the Southeastern United States: Research Directions for the Early 21st Century David G. Anderson 1993a; Ellis et al. 1998; Goodyear 1999a; Lepper and Meltzer 1991; Mason 1962; Morse et al. 1996; Williams and Stoltman 1965). In this paper, rather than repeat this existing informa- tion, I look at the state of current research and offer suggestions Abstract about what we should be doing to better understand the initial Paleoindian research effort in the Southeast and beyond in the years human occupation of the region. These suggestions are intended to come should be directed, as much as possible, to primary data to guide and not straitjacket or constrain research in the South- collection, both through fieldwork and laboratory analyses; absolute east in years to come. I have no doubt that exciting discoveries and relative dating of artifacts and assemblages; the use of calibrated will occur and that new models and approaches will be devel- or calendar dates; the increasing adoption of multidisciplinary re- oped that are completely unanticipated here. That is as it should search approaches; the development of well-grounded models; and be, and is, after all, what makes archaeology such an exciting the full publication of the results of current and past fieldwork. The field. Just as we often don’t know what we will find when we dig, reward structure of the archaeological profession, in academia and so too are we frequently surprised at where our analyses and beyond, should be refocused to emphasize the production of compre- modeling take us.
    [Show full text]
  • Discover Illinois Archaeology
    Discover Illinois Archaeology ILLINOIS ASSOCIATION FOR ADVANCEMENT OF ARCHAEOLOGY ILLINOIS ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY Discover Illinois Archaeology Illinois’ rich cultural heritage began more collaborative effort by 18 archaeologists from than 12,000 years ago with the arrival of the across the state, with a major contribution by ancestors of today’s Native Americans. We learn Design Editor Kelvin Sampson. Along with sum- about them through investigations of the remains maries of each cultural period and highlights of they left behind, which range from monumental regional archaeological research, we include a earthworks with large river-valley settlements to short list of internet and print resources. A more a fragment of an ancient stone tool. After the extensive reading list can be found at the Illinois arrival of European explorers in the late 1600s, a Association for Advancement of Archaeology succession of diverse settlers added to our cul- web site www.museum.state.il.us/iaaa/DIA.pdf. tural heritage, leading to our modern urban com- We hope that by reading this summary of munities and the landscape we see today. Ar- Illinois archaeology, visiting a nearby archaeo- chaeological studies allow us to reconstruct past logical site or museum exhibit, and participating environments and ways of life, study the rela- in Illinois Archaeology Awareness Month pro- tionship between people of various cultures, and grams each September, you will become actively investigate how and why cultures rise and fall. engaged in Illinois’ diverse past and DISCOVER DISCOVER ILLINOIS ARCHAEOLOGY, ILLINOIS ARCHAEOLOGY. summarizing Illinois culture history, is truly a Alice Berkson Michael D. Wiant IIILLINOIS AAASSOCIATION FOR CONTENTS AAADVANCEMENT OF INTRODUCTION.
    [Show full text]
  • Olde New Mexico
    Olde New Mexico Olde New Mexico By Robert D. Morritt Olde New Mexico, by Robert D. Morritt This book first published 2011 Cambridge Scholars Publishing 12 Back Chapman Street, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE6 2XX, UK British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library Copyright © 2011 by Robert D. Morritt All rights for this book reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of the copyright owner. ISBN (10): 1-4438-2709-6, ISBN (13): 978-1-4438-2709-6 TABLE OF CONTENTS Foreword ................................................................................................... vii Preface........................................................................................................ ix Sources ....................................................................................................... xi The Clovis Culture ...................................................................................... 1 Timeline of New Mexico History................................................................ 5 Pueblo People.............................................................................................. 7 Coronado ................................................................................................... 11 Early El Paso ............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • National Register of Historic Places Multiple Property Documentation
    NPS Form 10-900-b OMB .vo ion-0018 (Jan 1987) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places JUH151990' Multiple Property Documentation Form NATIONAL REGISTER This form is for use in documenting multiple property groups relating to one or several historic contexts. See instructions in Guidelines for Completing National Register Forms (National Register Bulletin 16). Complete each item by marking "x" in the appropriate box or by entering the requested information. For additional space use continuation sheets (Form 10-900-a). Type all entries. A. Name of Multiple Property Listing___________________________________________ Prehistoric Paleo-Indian Cultures of the Colorado Plains, ca. 11,500-7500 BP B. Associated Historic Contexts_____________________________________________ Sub-context; Clovis Culture; 11,500-11,000 B.P.____________ sub-context: Folsom Culture; 11,000-10,000 B.P. Sub-context; Piano Culture: 10,000-7500 B.P. C. Geographical Data___________________________________________________ The Plains Region of Colorado is that area of the state within the Great Plains Physiographic Province, comprising most of the eastern half of the state (Figure 1). The Colorado Plains is bounded on the north, east and south by the Colorado State Line. On the west, it is bounded by the foothills of the Rocky Mountains. [_]See continuation sheet D. Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended, I hereby certify that this documentation form meets the National Register documentation standards and sets forth requirements for the listing of relaje«kproperties consistent with the National Register criteria. This submission meets the procedural and professional renuirifiaejits set forth in 36 CFSKPaV 60 and.
    [Show full text]